Printer Friendly

Effect of fibrous diets on chemical composition and odours from pig slurry.


Modern pig production systems are criticized for their negative impact on the environment due to nitrogenous gas excretions and odor emission from barns [1]. This is due to large quantities of excreta being produced from pig operations, resulting in loss of gaseous emissions such as ammonia, methane and odors [2]. Although nutrient losses are inevitable, nutritional manipulation can reduce the level of ammonia and odor that is lost in pig facilities by shift partitioning of nitrogen excretion from urea and uric acid in the urine to microbial protein in the feces and lowering the pH of feces by including fermentable carbohydrates in the diet [1,3].

Odor production results from the anaerobic breakdown of nutrients, especially proteins in the gut and in slurry [4,5]. Ingredient composition of the diet affects odors from pig slurry Incorporating dietary fiber influences the chemical composition and reduces odor emissions [1], hence promoting environmentally friendly pig production. Feeding high fibre diets induces fermentation and consequently increases the excretion of short- chain fatty acids in faeces which decreases the pH value in slurries [6]. Dietary fiber also reduces nutrient loss through pig manure by shifting excretion of nitrogen to feces where it is bound to less volatile bacterial nitrogen. Moreover, the excretion of environmental harmful ammonia is mostly through urine from the urea [1].

Characterization of pig excreta, feces and urine from pigs fed diets diluted with various dietary fiber sources such as Lucerne hay (LH), maize cobs (MC), and sunflower husks (SH) have been explored [7]. The influence of such dietary fiber sources on the changes that occur in the chemical composition and odors from slurry over time is poorly documented. Incubating the slurry, where about half of nitrogen excreted through urine and feces is assumed to be emitted during storage and surface application of the manure, requires a clear understanding of the odors and the changes in chemical characteristics that occur in slurry over standard incubation periods. The breakdown of materials present in manure including protein, which produces the odor might take weeks or longer [1].

The LH, MC, and SH are widely available and are abundant in the tropical region. These fibrous sources do not impose adverse effects on the performance of growing pigs fed fiber inclusion levels below 160 g/kg inclusion levels [5,8,9]. Understanding their effects on odor offensiveness assists in reducing pollution from pig enterprises. Therefore, the objective of the study was to determine the effect of incorporating different fiber sources of varying levels to pig diets on the composition and odors emitted from slurry storage over a 16 day incubation period.


Animal care

The care and use of the pigs was performed following the Certificate of Authorization to experiment on Living Animals from UKZN Animal Ethics Committee (Reference Number: 096/11/Animal).

Study site and ethical consideration

The experiment was conducted at Ukulinga Research farm, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. The farm is located at 29[degrees]40' S, 30[degrees]24' E with the latitude of about 775 m above sea level. Daily temperatures average 29[degrees]C, with variation ranging from 28.2[degrees]C to 43[degrees]C. Mean annual rainfall is 735 mm, mostly received in summer, with light to moderate frost occurring occasionally in winter [10].

Pig management, diets and design

Twenty eight health clinically weaner (male, Pig Improvement Company) pigs weighing an average of 18[+ or -]2.3 kg were used over a 4-week experimental period including 10 day of adaptation period. They were housed in a room with artificial lighting, heating and ventilation systems. The pigs were confined individually in pens measuring 1.5x1.0 [m.sup.2], containing plastic self-feeders trough and a low-pressure nipple drinker (Big Dutchman Lean Machine, Vechta, Lower Saxony, Germany). The ambient temperature and relative humidity were recorded throughout the experiment at 15 minute intervals using a HOBO TE MPERATURE, RH, 1996 ONSET logger (Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne, MA, USA). The house conditions were kept at a temperature of 21.9[degrees]C[+ or -]2.24[degrees]C, 45.2% [+ or -]6.85% relative humidity and a 12 h dark-12 h artificial light cycle. The feed and water were provided ad libitum. The three fiber sources were chosen based on the availability in the tropics, and to dilute the basal diet. The LH, MC, and SH were ground to pass through a 2 mm screen. The fiber sources were then included at different inclusion levels of 0, 80, and 160 g/kg dry matter (DM) in diet of pigs. It was assumed that the incorporation of fiber would influence the physico-chemical characteristics excreta of pigs.

The conventional diet (Express Weaner) was purchased from a local feed manufacturing company (Meadow Feeds Limited, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa) with a low level of dietary fiber of 50 g/kg DM of total dietary fiber. Ingredients used in the formulation of basal diet were; yellow maize (426 g/kg), soya bean (176 g/kg), soybean oil cake (83 g/kg), wheat bran (100 g/kg), whole wheat (100 g/kg), Oil-sunflower (75 g/kg), cape fish (20 g/kg), and additives (20 g/kg). Table 1 shows chemical analysis of diet containing different fiber sources used in the study. The diet was designed to meet all the nutrient requirements of the pigs. Each pig, representing an experimental unit, was used in completely randomized design. All the four randomly selected pigs per treatment were fed into each of the seven diets including a control.

Excreta collection, storage and analyses

An amount of 250 g of feces was collected from each pig immediately after defecation. Urine collection was done through placing plastic trays underneath each pen to allow collection of urine that would have oozed through a 1 mm. To reduce the volatilization of nitrogenous compounds in the urine collected, 2 mL of 25% sulphuric acid was added to each tray within 5 minutes of collection. Collected feces and urine samples were stored at 4[degrees]C, pending analyses.

The excreta from each pig receiving the same treatment was mixed in 3 L buckets to make slurry for all the samples collected. Slurry was made by mixing feces and urine in a ratio of 1:2.3 (w/w basis of feces and urine) according to Canh et al [11]. Amounts of 200 g of feces and 460 g of urine per pig were sampled on day 1 and 16 of the incubation period of slurry. The slurry was left to stand and ferment at room temperature for a 16 d period in their respective buckets. Sampling for chemical analyses was done on day 1 and 16 of the incubation period of the slurry.


The weight of the experimental pigs was recorded weekly. Feed intake was determined weekly to compute the average daily feed intake (ADFI). The pigs were being weighed once a week to estimate average daily gain (ADG), by weighing feed supplied in and feed left each week. Then feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated by dividing feed intake by weight gain. The nitrogen content of the slurry was analyzed using the diffusion technique for soil nitrogen fractionation described by Mulvaney et al [12]. The pH of the slurry was measured on a pH meter, calibrated with certified pH 4 and 7 buffer solutions according to procedures by Lynch et al [13]. Concentrations of acetate, propionate, iso-butyrate, butyrate, and valerate were done following procedures described by Otto et al [14]. The chemical oxygen absorbencies were determined according to Quayle et al [15]. Odor offensiveness was determined using 18 panelists from day 1 and day 16 of incubation period at the Discipline of Animal and Poultry Science at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. Hedonic tone was used to evaluate the odor offensiveness, which was defined as the character of odor (unpleasantness or pleasantness) observed above the odor detection threshold, as described by Otto et al [14].

Statistical analyses

The effect of dietary fibre source and the fibre inclusion level on the chemical composition of the slurry for two incubation periods was analysed using PROC general linear model of SAS [16]. The PDIFF procedure of SAS [16] was used to separate and compare treatment means. Pair-wise comparisons of means were performed using the PDIFF option. Effects could be considered significant when probabilities were below 0.05. The model used was:

[mathematical expression not reproducible]

Where, [Y.sub.ijk] = dependent variable (pH, chemical oxygen demand [COD], nitrogen, acetate, propionate, iso-butyrate, butyrate, valerate and odour),

[mu] = the overall mean,

[F.sub.i] = the effect of the type of dietary fibre (i = LH, MC, and SH),

[L.sub.j] = inclusion level (j = 0, 80, and 160 g/kg),

[P.sub.k] = incubation period, (k = Day 1 and Day 16),

[(FxL).sub.ij] = interaction of fibre type and fibre inclusion level,

[(FxP).sub.ik] = interaction of fibre type and the incubation period,

[(LxP).sub.jk] = interaction of fibre inclusion level and the incubation period,

[(FxLxP).sub.ijk] = interaction of fibre type, fibre inclusion level and incubation periods tested, and;

[E.sub.ijkl] = residual error.

Data on odour offensiveness were square-root transformed before analyses. Pearson's correlation test was run to cater for the relationship that could exist between the chemical composition of the slurry and the odour offensiveness numerical scales obtained by olfactory sensory evaluation.


Effect of feeding fibrous diets on average daily feed intake, daily gain, and feed conversion ratio of pigs

Table 2 gives the impact of LH, MC, and SH incorporation on ADFI, ADG, and FCR of pigs. The ADFI decreased linearly with inclusion level of all fibre based diets (p<0.05). There was an effect of SH in ADG (p<0.05). There was a non-significant relationship between inclusion level of LH, MC, and SH. Increasing levels of all fibre diets illustrated a non-significant effect on FCR (p>0.05).

Effect of fibre source, inclusion level and incubation period on chemical composition of slurry

The levels of significance for the chemical composition of pig slurry fed different fibre sources at varying inclusion levels and incubation periods are portrayed in Table 3. Fibre source affected pH, propionate, iso-butyrate, butyrate (p<0.05), COD and nitrogen content (p<0.01). Their inclusion level, on the other side, had an impact on total short chain fatty acid (TSCFA) concentrations (p<0.05) particularly butyrate (p<0.05) and valerate (p<0.01). The pH, COD, TSCFA concentrations were influenced by period of incubation (p<0.01). An interaction between fibre source and fibre inclusion level on content of nitrogen and pH was observed (p<0.05). Interaction between fibre source and incubation period had effect on the pH, nitrogen content, the TSCFAs (p<0.05), including iso-butyrate and butyrate (p<0.01). Interaction among fibre sources, fibre inclusion level and the incubation period affected valerate (p< 0.05) and butyrate (p<0.01).

The pH of the slurry was different across all fibre sources during day 1 of incubation period (Table 4). The slurry from pigs fed MC and SH, was, however similar on day 16. The COD was also similar across all fibre sources on the first day of incubation (p>0.05). On day 16, the slurry of pigs fed into SH had a high concentration of COD as compared to the slurry of LH. Nitrogen concentration of slurry from LH tended to be significant (p>0.05). The concentration of TSCFAs were high for SH during day 1, but were highest and the same across all fibre sources during day 16 compared to day 1. The similarity of acetate, propionate and valerate concentration were observed across fibre sources (p>0.05). Isobutyrate and butyrate were the same on day 1, but was largest for MC on day 16 (p< 0.05).

Odor offensiveness

Figure 1, illustrates the effects of dietary fibre inclusion on odour offensiveness. Odour offensiveness of the slurry varied amongst all fibre sources tested (p<0.01). Slurry from pigs fed on diets containing MC had a high odour offensiveness scores than pigs fed into SH. On day 1, the slurry from pigs fed MC was less offensive than the slurry on day 16. The offensiveness of the slurries from pigs fed diets containing LH and SH was similar for both days.


The correlation coefficients are shown in Table 5. There was a positive correlation amongst all chemical parameters tested, except for pH which was negatively correlated to all the chemical parameters tested (p<0.05).


The differences in physico-chemical properties and extent f lignification lead to fibres to be utilised differently in the gut of growing pigs and have variable effects on feed intake and performance [17,8]. Microbial fiber fermentation in the large intestine results in acidification of digesta due to SCFA production, resulting in the reduction of the pH of faeces and manure [18,2,1]. The decrease in pH is partly attributed to the decrease in the ammonium content of the slurry and increased SCFA concentration of the slurry following high fibre fermentation [11]. Likewise, a decline in slurry pH from chickens fed on diets containing molasses when the slurry was incubated for 14 days was reported [19]. In a separate study, it has been highlighted a reduction of pH of faeces and manure when pigs were fed on high fibre diets [20]. Lowering the pH of faeces and manure reduces ammonia emission since ammonia is soluble under its protonated form (N[H.sub.4.sup.+]) [1]. Low pH give rise to efficient retention of nitrogen in the faeces when urine and faeces combine, minimizing volatilization [20,21].

The COD is a measure of water capacity to absorb oxygen during the decomposition of organic matter and the oxidation of inorganic chemicals such as ammonia and nitrite. The findings that fibre source affected COD is in contrast with Gralapp et al [22] who reported no effect on COD in slurry of pigs fed on distillers dried grains. An increase in the COD content of the slurry with time accelerates the de-nitrification process of animal effluents.

Fibre source did not affect nitrogen content of the slurry in the present study. When high fibre diet is fermented, high SCFA concentrations are produced, which contribute to the decrease of pH content of slurry [11,23]. The pH ranges, though statistically different, but were narrow range on Day 1 (7.9 to 8.7) and Day 16 (7.73 to 8.04). The high buffering capacity of the slurries circumvented acidification during incubation even if an accumulation of SCFA occurred [24]. The higher concentration of TSCFA on Day 1 compared to Day 16 for all fibre sources agree with Vedrenne et al [24] who reported a presence of high levels of TSCFA at the start of the incubation and increased at Day 16. The increment of SCFA concentrations in slurry as the incubation time is prolonged could be attributed to the decrease in pH content of pig slurry, as also reported by Hankins et al [21]. The reduction in the microbial activities over time is due to fewer nutrients available in the slurry and a continuous drop of the pH of the slurry.

As fibre content increased in the diet, the malodour emissions are reduced. This can be attributed to an increase in the change of ammonia to nitrate by chemical oxidation, minimizing nutrient volatilization when pigs are fed on fibrous diets [22,13]. In the current study, the slurries from different fibre sources exhibited different pH values. The different fibre sources also have different physical properties and chemical composition [8]. High fibre diets promote microbial synthesis in the hindgut of pigs that yield high levels of SCFA concentrations. A similar process takes place during incubation. Hankins et al [21] and Ziemer et al [25] also highlighted that pH content of slurry also influences nitrogen, SCFAs and microbe activities in pig effluents.

The slurry offensiveness can be explained by the COD, nitrogen and the SCFAs. The COD of the slurry is an important factor in determining odour assessment from the stored slurry [22]. Low COD values and an increase production of isobutyrate and butyrate may indicate the increased in odour strength. The highest odour scale that resulted from MC-based diets on Days 1 and 16 reflect that maize cobs is relatively digestible and fermentable and producing high concentration of SCFAs such as iso-butyric and butyric acids. High iso-butyric and butyric acid concentration highlights an increase in the level of malodours produced from the slurry [26]. These SCFA concentrations increase odour strength that the slurry from pigs fed on high fibre diets. These fatty acids are one of the leading contributors to odour formation. Low slurry pH values might also have influenced the balance between the volatile and the non-volatile compounds. Odour is a combination of various unpleasant compounds that from animal effluents such as pig slurry [20,27].


The COD varied greatly with fibre source on Day 16 of incubation period. Sunflower husk had highest COD than other fibre source-based diets on Day 16 of incubation. The pH values were different among the fibre- based diets on Day 1. On Day 16, the pH changed except for sunflower husk. Maize cobs-based diet yielded high concentrations of butyrate and isobutyrate than other fibre sources. LH-based diet yielded high concentrations of acetate on Day 16 of incubation. Maize cobs-based diet produced more odours as compared to other fibre-based diets. Sunflower husk was the least offensive. Fibre source, therefore, need to be considered as nutritional strategy to reduce gaseous emission and odour of pig slurry.


We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.


The Authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Research Foundation of South Africa and the UKZN Competitive Research Grant (Funding code: P530).


[1.] Jha R, Berrocoso JF. Dietary fiber and protein fermentation in the intestine of swine and their interactive effects on gut health and on the environment: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;212:18-26.

[2.] Bundy JW, Carter SD, Lachmann ML, Jenkins SK, Marable Z. Effects of fiber addition to a low excretion diet on swine growth performance and slurry characteristics during the finishing phase. Oklahoma Agricultural Experimental Station, United States; 2007.

[3.] Aarnink AJA, Verstegen MWA. Nutrition, key factor to reduce environmental load from pig production. Livest Sci 2007;109: 194-203.

[4.] Bindelle J, Leterme P, Buldgen A. Nutritional and environmental consequences of dietary fibre in pig nutrition: a review. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 2008;12:69-80.

[5.] Kanengoni AT, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, Kusina J, Maswaure SM. Growth performance and carcass traits of Large White, Mukota and Large White x Mukota F1 crosses given graded levels of maize cob meal. Anim Sci 2004;78:61-6.

[6.] Galassi G, Colombini S, Malagutti L, Crovetto GM, Rapetti L. Effects of high fibre and low protein diets on performance, digestibility, nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission in the heavy pig. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2010;161:140-8.

[7.] Mpendulo CT, Chimonyo M, Ndou SP, Bakare AG. Fiber source and inclusion level affects characteristics of excreta from growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:755-62.

[8.] Ndou, SP, Gous RM, Chimonyo M. Prediction of scaled feed intake in weaner pigs using physico-chemical properties of fibrous feeds. Br J Nutr 2013;110:774-80.

[9.] Bakare AG, Ndou SP, Madzimure J, Chimonyo M. Nutritionally related blood metabolites and performance of finishing pigs fed on graded levels of dietary fibre. Trop Anim Health Prod 2016;48:1-5.

[10.] Bengaly K, Mhlongo S, Nsahlai IV The effect of wattle tannin on intake, digestibility, nitrogen retention and growth performance of goats in South Africa. Livest Res Rural Dev 2007; 19:Article#50.

[11.] Canh TT, Sutton AL, Aarnink AJA, Verstegen MWA. Dietary carbohydrates alter the faecal composition and ph and the ammonia emission from slurry of growing pigs. J Anim Sci 1998;76:1887-95.

[12.] Mulvaney RL, Khan SA. Diffusion methods to determine different forms of nitrogen in soil hydrolysates. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2001;65:1284-95.

[13.] Lynch MB, Sweeney T, Callan JJ, O'Doherty JV The effect of dietary barley level on volatile fatty acid concentration and manure ammonia emissions in finishing pigs. Livest Sci 2007; 109:236-9.

[14.] Otto ER, Yokoyama M, Hengemuehle S, et al. Ammonia, volatile fatty acids, phenolics, and odour offensiveness in manure from growing pigs fed diets reduced in protein concentration. J Anim Sci 2003;81:1754-63.

[15.] Statistical Analysis System. SAS/STAT Software Release 9.2. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 2008.

[16.] Shriver JA, Carter SD, Sutton AL, et al. Effects of adding fiber sources to reduced-crude protein, amino acid-supplemented diets on nitrogen excretion, growth performance, and carcass traits of finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2003;81:492-502.

[17.] Nagadi S, Herrero M, Jessop NS. The influence of diet of the donor animal on the initial bacterial concentration of ruminal fluid and in-vitro gas production degradability parameters. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2000;87:231-9.

[18.] Salminen E, Rintala J. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste, a review. Bioresour Technol 2002;83:13-26.

[19.] Galassi G, Colombini S, Malagutti L, Crovetto GM, Rapetti L. Effects of high fibre and low protein diets on performance, digestibility, nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission in the heavy pig. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2010;161:140-8.

[20.] Canh TT, Verstegen MWA, Aarnink AJA, Schrama JW Influence of dietary factors on nitrogen partitioning and composition of urine and faeces of fattening pigs. J Anim Sci 1997; 75:700-6.

[21.] Hankins SL, DeCamp SA, Richert BT, Anderson DB, Sutton AL. The effect of pay lean and dietary crude protein level on odour production and nutrient concentration in anaerobically stored pig manure. West Lafayette, IN, USA: Purdue University; 2008.

[22.] Gralapp AK, Powers WJ, Faust MA, Bundy DS. Effects of dietary ingredients on manure characteristics and odorous emissions from swine. J Anim Sci 2002;80:1512-9.

[23.] Le PD, Aarnink AJA, Jongbloed AW. Odour and ammonia emissions as affected by dietary crude protein level. Livest Sci 2009;21:267-74.

[24.] Vedrenne F, Beline F, Dabert P, Bernet N. The effect of incubation conditions on the laboratory measurement of the methane producing capacity of livestock wastes. Bioresour Technol 2008;99:146-55.

[25.] Ziemer CJ, Kerr BJ, Trabue SL, et al. Dietary protein and cellulose effects on chemical and microbial characteristics of swine faeces and stored manure. J Environ Qual 2009;38:2138-46.

[26.] Masse DI, Croteau F, Masse L, et al. Effect of dietary fiber incorporation on the characteristics of pregnant sows slurry. Can Biosyst Eng 2003;45:6.7-12.

[27.] Hernandez F, Martinez S, Lopez C, et al. Effect of dietary crude protein levels in a commercial range, on the nitrogen balance, ammonia emission and pollutant characteristics of slurry in fattening pigs. Animal 2011;8:1290-8.

Conference Thando Mpendulo (1), Vuyisa Andries Hlatini (1), Cypril Ndumiso Ncobela (1), and Michael Chimonyo (1),*

* Corresponding Author: Michael Chimonyo Tel: +27-33-260-5477, Fax: +27-33-260-5067, E-mail:

(1) Animal and Poultry Science, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P Bag X01 Scottsville 3209, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa


Conference Thando Mpendulo

Michael Chimonyo

Submitted Feb 15, 2016; Revised Mar 16, 2016; Accepted Sept 6, 2016

Caption: Figure 1. Odour offensiveness from slurry treated with lucerne hay (LH), maize cob (MC), and sunflower husk (SH) over an incubation period of 16 days.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the conventional ration and diluted
rations (lucerne hay, maize cob, and sunflower husk) used, as fed
basis at different inclusion levels

Composition                       Inclusion   Lucerne hay   Maize cob

Dry matter (g/kg)                    80         989.31       989.32
                                     160        990.07       990.40
Gross energy (kJ)                    80          18.14        18.03
                                     160         18.00        17.94
Crude protein (g/kg)                 80         192.64       181.75
                                     160        187.02       168.11
Ether extracts (g/kg)                80          49.22        51.25
                                     160         45.27        45.92
Ash (g/kg)                           80          63.19        59.08
                                     160         65.10        54.91
Crude fibre (g/kg)                   80          46.08        36.46
                                     160         67.09        47.91
Neutral detergent fibre (g/kg)       80         228.13       210.65
                                     160        261.16       234.42
Acid detergent fibre (g/kg)          80         101.23       101.57
                                     160        126.02       127.48
Nitrogen (g/kg)                      80          30.85        29.74
                                     160         29.92        26.90

Composition                       Inclusion   Sunflower   Control
                                   level        husk       diet

Dry matter (g/kg)                    80        989.32     989.39
                                     160       989.43
Gross energy (kJ)                    80         18.20      18.12
                                     160        18.31
Crude protein (g/kg)                 80        184.90     195.73
                                     160       166.70
Ether extracts (g/kg)                80         54.13      52.94
                                     160        55.48
Ash (g/kg)                           80         56.62      61.19
                                     160        53.85
Crude fibre (g/kg)                   80         55.61      26.15
                                     160        86.34
Neutral detergent fibre (g/kg)       80        243.14     192.38
                                     160       269.82
Acid detergent fibre (g/kg)          80         94.56      88.45
                                     160       110.71
Nitrogen (g/kg)                      80         26.76      31.36
                                     160        23.34

Table 2. Effect of fibre source and inclusion level on average
daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed
conversion ratio (fCR)

                          Inclusion (g/kg)

Item          source    0      80    160     SEM     Significance

ADFI (kg/d)
                LH     3.60   2.92   3.66   0.231         **
                MC     3.58   3.31   2.98   0.231         *
                SH     3.41   3.26   3.43   0.231         *
ADG (kg/d)
                LH     0.84   1.08   1.14   0.137         NS
                MC     0.91   0.93   0.81   0.137         NS
                SH     0.98   0.92   0.95   0.137         *
                LH     0.23   0.39   0.32   0.0808        NS
                MC     0.26   0.30   0.27   0.0808        NS
                SH     0.28   0.30   0.28   0.0808        NS

SEM, standard error of the mean; ADF, average daily gain;
MC, maize cob; SH, sunflower hulls; LH, lucerne hay; ADG, average
daily gain; FCR, feed conversion ratio.
* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; NS, not significant (p>0.05).

Table 3. Significance levels for fibre source, fibre inclusion
level, and the incubation period on pH, chemical oxygen demand,
nitrogen and short chain fatty acids


Fixed effects                  pH        COD          Nitrogen
                                    (mg[O.sub.2]/L)    (g/kg)

Fibre source                   *          **             **
Fibre inclusion level          NS         NS             NS
Incubation period              **         **             NS
Fibre sourcexfibre inclusion
  level                        **         NS             *
Fibre source x incubation
  period                       *          NS             *
Fibre source x fibre
  inclusion level x
  incubation period            NS         NS             NS


Fixed effects                  TSCFAs    Ac (g/kg)   Pr (g/kg)

Fibre source                     NS         NS           *
Fibre inclusion level             *         NS          NS
Incubation period                **         **          **
Fibre sourcexfibre inclusion
  level                          NS         NS          NS
Fibre source x incubation
  period                          *         NS          NS
Fibre source x fibre
  inclusion level x
  incubation period              NS         NS          NS


Fixed effects                  i-But (g/kg)   n-But (g/kg)

Fibre source                        *              *
Fibre inclusion level               NS             *
Incubation period                   **             **
Fibre sourcexfibre inclusion
  level                             NS             NS
Fibre source x incubation
  period                            **             **
Fibre source x fibre
  inclusion level x
  incubation period                 NS             **


Fixed effects                  Val (g/kg)

Fibre source                       NS
Fibre inclusion level              **
Incubation period                  **
Fibre sourcexfibre inclusion
  level                            NS
Fibre source x incubation
  period                           NS
Fibre source x fibre
  inclusion level x
  incubation period                *

COD, chemical oxygen demand; TSCFAs, total short chain fatty acids;
Ac, acetate; Pr, propionate; i-But, iso-butyrate; n-But, butyrate;
Val, Valerate.

** Indicates the level of significance at p <0.01; * indicates the
level of significance at p < 0.05; NS, indicates insignificance at
p >0.05.

Table 4. Least square means ([+ or -]SE) for the effects of period
of incubation and fibre type on the pH, chemical oxygen demand,
nitrogen and short chain fatty acid concentrations, on wet basis

                                                Day 1

Parameter                           LH            MC           SH

pH                               7.99 (c)     8.77 (b)      8.32 (e)
Chemical oxygen demand
  (mg [O.sub.2]/L)               366 (a)       348 (a)      362 (a)
Nitrogen (g/kg)                 5.03 (bcc)    4.70 (ab)    4.90 (abc)
Total short chain fatty acids
  (g/kg)                        10.3 (ab)     9.58 (a)      11.3 (b)
Acetate (g/kg)                   6.80 (a)     6.80 (a)      7.36 (a)
Propionate (g/kg)               1.70 (ab)     1.43 (a)     2.34 (bc)
Iso-butyrate (g/kg)              0.20 (a)     0.16 (a)      0.20 (a)
Butyrate (g/kg)                  1.41 (a)     0.98 (a)      1.29 (a)
Valerate (g/kg)                  0.19 (a)      0.21 (a)     0.15 (a)

                                              Day 16

Parameter                           LH          MC           SH

pH                              7.73 (a)     8.03 (d)    8.04 (de)
Chemical oxygen demand
  (mg [O.sub.2]/L)               369 (a)     425 (b)      512 (c)
Nitrogen (g/kg)                 5.60 (d)     4.40 (a)    5.40 (cd)
Total short chain fatty acids
  (g/kg)                        33.1 (c)     33.1 (c)    32.0 (c)
Acetate (g/kg)                  25.9 (c)     24.0 (b)    23.9 (b)
Propionate (g/kg)               2.97 (cd)    3.37 (e)    3.65 (d)
Iso-butyrate (g/kg)             0.87 (b)     1.22 (c)    0.96 (b)
Butyrate (g/kg)                 2.50 (b)     3.53 (c)    2.32 (b)
Valerate (g/kg)                  0.84 (b)    1.00 (bc)    1.14 (c)

Parameter                        SEM    p-value

pH                              0.117   0.0318
Chemical oxygen demand
  (mg [O.sub.2]/L)              21.43   0.0001
Nitrogen (g/kg)                 0.200   0.0551
Total short chain fatty acids
  (g/kg)                        0.422   0.0117
Acetate (g/kg)                  0.585   0.0006
Propionate (g/kg)               0.266   0.3770
Iso-butyrate (g/kg)             0.057   0.0065
Butyrate (g/kg)                 0.197   0.0015
Valerate (g/kg)                 0.085   0.1483

SEM, standard error of the mean; LH, lucerne hay; MC, maize cob;
SH, sunflower husk.

(a,b,c,d,e) Within a row, means with the different superscripts
differ (p < 0.05).

Table 5. Pearson's correlation coefficients among slurry

Measure     pH        COD         N          Ac         Pr

Odour     0.12 **      NS      -0.28 **    0.09 *       NS
pH          --      -0.19 **   -0.41 **   -0.51 **   -0.38 **
COD         --         --      0.13 **    0.51 **    0.57 **
N           --         --         --      0.23 **    0.20 **
Ac          --         --         --         --      0.75 **
Pr          --         --         --         --         --
i-But       --         --         --         --         --
n-But       --         --         --         --         --
Val         --         --         --         --         --

Measure    i-But      n-But       Val       TSCFA

Odour     0.21 **    0.20 **     0.09 *    0.10 **
pH        -0.44 **   -0.37 **   -0.41 **   -0.53 **
COD       0.41 **    0.15 **    0.42 **    0.49 **
N            NS         NS      0.16 **    0.17 **
Ac        0.91 **    0.66 **    0.79 **    0.99 **
Pr        0.69 **    0.53 **    0.67 **    0.73 **
i-But        --      0.83 **    0.77 **    0.92 **
n-But        --         --      0.59 **    0.70 **
Val          --         --         --      0.81 **

COD, chemical oxygen demand; N, nitrogen; Ac, acetate;
Pr, propionate; i-But, iso-butyrate; n-But, butyrate;
Val, Valerate; TSCFA, total short chain fatty acids; Odour, odour

Significance level: ** p<0.01; * p<0.05;
NS, not significant (p>0.05).
COPYRIGHT 2018 Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Mpendulo, Conference Thando; Hlatini, Vuyisa Andries; Ncobela, Cypril Ndumiso; Chimonyo, Michael
Publication:Asian - Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Article Type:Report
Date:Nov 1, 2018
Previous Article:The change of sleeping and lying posture of Japanese black cows after moving into new environment.
Next Article:Title: Opportunities and challenges for research on food and nutrition security and agriculture in Asia.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |