Effect of different storage temperatures on enzyme-antibody conjugate used in immunohistochemistry.
To get the quality of staining the antibody-enzyme conjugate which is the backbone of all the results produced, its storage conditions must be of great attention. So, far no attempts have been known to see storage conditions in order to obtain a maximal stability and activity. Most authors treat the stability of the conjugates casually, given no specific data. (6) In this paper, our purpose is to compare the staining efficiency of Horseradish peroxidase- Antibody conjugation prepared by two step glutaraldeyde method (7,8) and kept at three different temperatures. The conjugates kept at different temperatures were tested by Immunohistochemical staining (Direct method) on the tissue sections obtained from routine reports.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preparation of Conjugate: Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) was employed because enzyme is commercially available in relatively pure form and is mostly used in all the IHC purposes. (9,10) The monoclonal antibody which was prepared by known hybridoma technique against Hela cells (Human Carcinoma Cervix)-AntiHela was linked by the enzyme HRP by two-step glutaraldeyde method. (11,12)
The reactivity of the antibody-conjugate was assessed by testing with Hela cells and also tested against the paraffin embedded tissue sections obtained from routine histological reports.
Storage of Conjugate: The conjugate was separately kept in sterilized glassware vials (one ml per vial) at room temperature (between 18[degrees] to 40[degrees]C), 4 and -70[degrees]C. Conjugates stored were tested after ever three months for their contaminations and positivity. Storage conditions have been tested for 24 months. Repeated freezing and thawing was avoided. No preservative was added in any of the vial.
Testing of Conjugates: The conjugate was tested by Immunohistochemical staining (Direct method). (13,14) Because this method utilizes only one antibody, it can be completed quickly, and nonspecific reactions are limited. The tissue sections obtained from routine histological reports were assessed (a) Carcinoma cervix sections grade I to III, (b). Non-Malignant Cervix and (c) Hela Cells against the conjugates. Diamine-benzidine (DAB) was used as substrate. A yellow-brown colour was developed. Protein content estimation of each conjugate was done by Lowry method. (15,16)
DISCUSSION: IHC staining methods are so widely used today that they are referred as just another special stain. Reagent and procedure used in these procedures using the Horseradish peroxidase (HRP), the Peroxidase-anti-peroxidase (PAP), the Avidin-biotin complex (ABC), or the Alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline-phosphatase (APAAP) for detection of antigen-specific antibodies in frozen or paraffin sections are necessary for the validation of the staining results. (17,18) Correct reagents contribute to the quality of staining if they are not prepared accurately and handled properly. They are often unstable when not in their native environment. (19) Each conjugate may have specific requirements once it is made and purified. If these requirements are not satisfied, the conjugate rapidly lose its ability to perform specific functions.
Several important practical steps are recognized in the process and many compounds are found to be added to lengthen shelf life, which are not satisfying and leads to inactivation in some cases or instability in others.
In most of the conjugates commercially prepared for IHC sodium azide, an antibacterial agent is present which can prevent binding of the peroxidase enzyme to its substrate and inhibit colour development. Thus the use of sodium azide is not recommended. Cryoprotectants such as glycerol or ethylene glycol are added to help to stabilize by preventing the formation of ice crystals at -20[degrees] C that also destroy structure of the combining antibody. (3) Protease inhibitors stops proteolytic cleavage of antibody while reducing agents like dithiothreitol (DTT) and 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) also prevents oxidation in the conjugate. Drying, lypolization and freezing of conjugates are also criteria in some IHC manufactured kits. (20) Since in the antibody-enzyme conjugates, the antibody comprise both hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids and are flexible polymeric molecules which results in the antibody spontaneous folding in aqueous solution. (21, 22, 23) These phase changes (repeatedly freezing and thawing) also effect interaction forces like electrostatic, H-bond, Vander Waals, chelation and disulfide bonds. (24,25)
Some of the IHC kits assembled and shipped also uses stabilizing diluent or solution for stabilization for conjugates. While aqueous solution is the natural functioning state for conjugates, this is not their state of greatest stability. Antibody becomes more flexible and prone to conformational changes.
The frequency of collision with other molecules and /or the cotainer surface increases. The possibility of microbial contamination increases and antibody used to conjugate becomes more susceptible to oxidation.
This study insures consistently high levels of activity for both the enzyme and the antibody following long-term storage. This storage at 4[degrees]C greatly improves the signal to noise ratios which increases the sensitivity and offers significantly increase of shelf life. This condition also provides resistance to various shipping conditions and storage temperatures for the groups who provide conjugates as well as improve day-to-day IHC work.
CONCLUSIONS/RESULTS: The usefulness of an enzyme-antibody conjugate in detecting antigen or antibody depends upon the degree to which that conjugate can be bind quantitatively to the antigen or can exhibit proportional loss of binding to fixed antigen by known amounts of free antigen. The success of staining depends on the quality of the conjugate, which, in turn, is a function of (1) the coupling process, (2) particular enzyme used, (3) purity of antibody and (4) the stability of the linkage. Since the quality and quantity of the antibody to be used are identical, so the conjugate is very useful and needs extra attention. Each antibody-enzyme conjugate suggest that it is important to check storage conditions specificity before making interpretations of immunohistochemical results.
Immunohistochemical methods acts as a valuable tools for both routine biochemical and research permanence of the reaction product and usefulness in fixed tissue sections, together with the facility for simultaneous pathological diagnosis, make the immunoperoxidase method the technique of choice in laboratory at the present time.
Our work emphasizes the importance of IHC of selecting the appropriate antibody-enzyme conjugate storage conditions before drawing conclusions about the specificity of new conjugate and the distribution of unknown antigens and suggests the conjugate of HRP prepared by two-step glutaraldeyde method kept at 4[degrees]C gave best result uptill two years. The cojugate showed positive reaction with Hela cells. The amount of protein in freshly prepared conjugate was 6.9 mg/dl and decreases with time. The presence or absence of specific immunostaining due to the storage conditions of antibody-conjugate are shown in Tables-I and II. Intensity of immunoreactivity was scored semi-quantitatively by classifying the sections as not detectable expression (-), very low ([+ or -]), low (+), moderate (++) or high staining intensity (+++).
Freezing and thawing of the conjugate also proved to affect stability. After multiple freezing and thawing cycles antibody activity was decreased in conjugate produced in the laboratory.
(1.) Coons AH, Leduc EH, Conolly JM: Studies on antibody production I: A method for the histochemical demonstration of specific antibody and its application to a study of the hyperimmune rabbit, J Expt Med: 102:49-60, 1955.
(2.) Fiets WC, Blankenstein MA, Struikmans H, Ruitenberg HM, Nortier JW: The prognostic value of hormone receptor detection by enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemistry: a prospective study in patients with early brast cancer. Int J Biol Markers, 17(1): 24-32, 2002.
(3.) Newton SS, Dow A Terwillinger R, Duman R: A simplified method for combined immunohistochemistry and insitu hybridization in fresh-frozen, cryo cut mouse brain sections. Brain Res Protoc, 9 (3): 214-219, 2002.
(4.) Boorsma. DM, Stree F Kerk and Kors Nal: Peroxidase and Fluorescein isothiochanate as antibody marker. J Histochem. Cytochem, 24: 1017-1025, 1976.
(5.) Advances S: Enzyme markers: Their linkage with proteins and use in immunohistochemistry. Histochem J, 4:321-330, 1972.
(6.) Asghar SS, Van Joost Th, Cormane RH: Comparison of immuno flurescence and immunoperoxidase technique for detection of tissue antigen. Arch. Dermatol. Res, 248:99-105, 1973.
(7.) Direksin K, Joo H, Goyal SM: An Immunoperoxidase monolayer assay for the detection of antibodies against swine influenza virus. J Vet Diagn Invest, (14)2: 169-171, 2002.
(8.) Nakane PK, Kawaoi A: Peroxidase labeled antibody: a new method for conjugation. J. Histochem. Cytochem, 22:1084-1089, 1974.
(9.) Avrameas S: Coupling of enzymes to protein with glutaraldehyde. Immunochemistry, 6:43-52, 1969.
(10.) Nakane PK: Recent progress in the peroxidase labeled antibody method. Ann NY Acad. Sci: 254: 203-209, 1975.
(11.) Goding JW: Antibody production by Hybridomas. J Immunol Meth, 39: 285-294 1980.
(12.) Mi L: Continuous perfusion culture Hybridoma cells for production of monoclonal antibody. Cheng Xu Bao 18 (3): 360-364, 2002. (English version).
(13.) Heyderman E: Immunoperoxidase technique in Histopathology-application methods and controls, J. Clin Pathol, 32: 971-978, 1979.
(14.) Jaskowski TD, Martins TB, Litwin CM, Hill HR: Comparison of four enzyme immunoasays for the detection of immunoglobulin G antibody against glomerular basement membrane. J Clin Lab Anal, 16(3): 143-145, 2002
(15.) Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Chem, 72: 248-252, 1976.
(16.) Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with folin-phenol reagent, J Biol Chem: 193:265-275, 1951.
(17.) Bergroth V, Reifama S, Konttinen YT, Lalla M: Sensitivity and non-specific staining of various immunoperoxidase techniques. Histochemistry, 68:17-25, 1980.
(18.) Bergroth V, Reitamo S, Konttinen Y Tk, Lalla M: Sensitivity and nonspecific staining of various Immunoperoxidase techniques. Histochemistry, 68:17-25, 1980.
(19.) Ciocca DR, Adams DJ, Bjercke RJ, Sledge GW Jr, Edwards DP, Chamness GC, McGuire WL: Monoclonal antibody storage conditions, and concentration effects on immunohistochemical specificity, J Histochem Cytochem: 31(5): 691-6, 1983.
(20.) Sali A, Shakhnovich E, Karplus M: How Does a Protein Fold? Nature, 369: 248-251, 1984.
(21.) Asakura T, Adachi K, Schwartz E: Stabilizing Effect of Various Organic Solvents on Protein, Journal of Biological Chemistry. 253: 6423-6425, 1978.
(22.) Klotz IM: Protein Conformation: Autoplastic and Alloplastic Effects, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 116: 92-96, 1966.
(23.) Torchilin VP: Enzyme Stabilization without Carriers, Enzyme and Microbiological Technology, 1:74-82 1979.
(24.) Burley SK, Petsko GA: Aromatic-Aromatic Interaction: A Mechanism of Protein Structure Stabilization, Science, 229: 23-28, 1985.
(25.) Kanehisa MI Tsong TY:Local Hydrophobicity Stabilizes Secondary Structures in Proteins, Biopolymers, 19: 1617-1628, 1980.
(26.) Arnold FH, Zhang JH: Metal-Medicated Protein Stabilization, Trends in Biotechnology, 12: 189192, 1994.
(27.) Bergmeyer HU ed: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 3rd ed. (Deerfield Beach, FL: Verlag Chemie, 1983).
(28.) Dawson EC, Homan JDH, Van Weemen BK: Stabilization of Peroxidase, U.S. Pat. 4:228, 240, October 14, 1980.
(29.) Nygren H, Kaijser B, Lange S: Effect of the properties of enzyme-antibody conjugates on the quantitation of serum antibodies to Escherichia coli 02 antigen by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent, Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol: 63 (4): 455-61, 1980.
(30.) Sali A, Shakhnovich E, Karplus M: How Does a Protein Fold? Nature, 369: 248-251, 1984.
(31.) Torchilin VP: Enzyme Stabilization without Carriers, Enzyme and Microbiological Technology, 1: 74-82 1979.
V. Mehrotra , A. Sharma , V. L. Lahiri , S. Sharma , S. Dube 
[1.] V. Mehrotra
[2.] A. Sharma
[3.] V. L. Lahiri
[4.] S. Sharma
[5.] S. Dube
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
[1.] Professor, Department of Biochemistry, HIHT, Dehradun.
[2.] Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, MAMC, Agroha, Hisar.
[3.] Professor, Department of Pathology, SNMC, Agra, U. P.
[4.] Junior Resident, MAMC, Agroha, Hisar.
[5.] Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, MAMC, Agroha, Hisar.
FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None
NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Ashutosh Sharma, Department of Biochemistry, MAMC, Agroha, Hisar, Haryana.
Date of Submission: 10/02/2015.
Date of Peer Review: 11/02/2015.
Date of Acceptance: 26/02/2015.
Date of Publishing: 06/03/2015.
Table I: Intensity and activity of antibody-conjugate Temp 0 3 6 9 [degrees]C day months months months RT +++ ++ ++ ++ 4 +++ +++ ++ ++ -70 +++ +++ ++ + Temp 12 15 18 24 [degrees]C months months months months RT + [+ or -] - - 4 ++ ++ ++ + -70 [+ or -] [+ or -] - - Table II: Protein Contents of antibody-conjugate in mg/dl Temp 0 3 6 9 day months months months RT 6.9 6.2 6.2 4.5 4 6.9 6.5 6.2 5.9 -70 6.9 6.6 6.0 5.6 Temp 12 15 18 24 months months months months RT 3.2 Contaminated 4 5.6 4.2 3.1 2.8 -70 3.8 3.0 2.5 1.6
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||ORIGINAL ARTICLE|
|Author:||Mehrotra, V.; Sharma, A.; Lahiri, V.L.; Sharma, S.; Dube, S.|
|Publication:||Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences|
|Date:||Mar 9, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Comparitive study of local steroid injection versus autologous blood injection therapy for the management of lateral epicondylitis.|
|Next Article:||Causes of divorce: a descriptive study from Central Kerala.|