Printer Friendly

Effect of different diets on the development, mortality, survival, food uptake and fecundity of Tupiocoris cucurbitaceus (Hemiptera: Miridae).

The greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) and the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) are serious pests in protected culture as well as in outdoor crops (Bi et al. 2002; Byrne & Bellows 1991; Ellsworth & Martinez-Carrillo 2001; Naranjo & Ellsworth 2001; Park et al. 2004, 1998; Stansly et al. 2004). These whiteflies cause economic damage to crops by feeding on phloem sap, contaminating leaves and fruits with honeydew, which supports the growth of sooty mold, and by transmitting plant viral diseases (Arno et al. 2006; Bi et al. 2002; Byrne & Bellows 1991; Hodges & Evans 2005; Park et al. 1998; van Lenteren & Noldus 1990).

The use of Aphelinidae parasitoids (Hymenoptera) has yielded satisfactory results in numerous examples of biological control of whiteflies such as Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hoddle 2004; Pilkington et al. 2010; van Lenteren et al. 1996) and Eretmocerus mundus Mercet (De Barro et al. 2000; Stansly et al. 2005, 2004). Nonetheless, several pests are often present on crops at the same time and may survive due to the host specificity of some parasitoid species. To complement this effect it would be of interest to use a natural enemy that is not only attack whiteflies but also will attack other harmful species on the crop such as aphids, thrips, and mites (Fauvel et al. 1987).

Among the various generalist predators, Miridae (Hemiptera) species are being researched and commercialized to control whiteflies, especially the Palearctic species Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) (Miridae), incorrectly identified as M. caliginosus Wagner (Faten Hamdi et al. 2012; Perdikis et al. 2003). This species has been successfully used in Europe against T. vaporariorum (Bonato et al. 2006; Gabarra et al. 2004; Lucas & Alomar 2002; Malezieux et al. 1995; TrottinCaudal & Millot 1994; van Schelter et al. 1995) and B. tabaci (Alomar et al. 2006; Bonato et al. 2006; Jazzar & Hammad 2004; Lucas & Alomar 2002; Pasini et al. 1998, Sampson & King 1996).

Spinola (1852) described the mirid Tupiocoris cucurbitaceus (Spinola) from Chile. It was identified in Uruguay by Carvalho (1947) and later reported in Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Brazil (Carvalho & Afonso 1977) and Argentina (Carpintero & Carvalho 1993). Like M. caliginosus (Bonato et al. 2006; Lucas & Alomar 2001), it is a zoophytophagous species (Bado et al. 2005; Ohashi & Urdanpilleta 2003), which exploits both plant and animal food sources. The insects live in a competitive system, because the omnivore (predatory species) and its prey (whiteflies species) feed on the same plant. It is an apparent competitive system, because both plant and herbivore are consumed by the same omnivore. This case is a special (or "degenerate") case of intraguild predation (IGP), namely when a plant provides food to an intraguild (IG) predator (Arim & Marquet 2004; Coll & Guershon 2002; Garay et al. 2012; Holt & Polis 1997; Polis & Holt 1992). IGP gained major interest in biological control, not only for conservation purposes but also for pest control in open-field and greenhouse crops (Brodeur & Boivin 2006).

The capacity of M. pygmaeus to go in and out of greenhouses may regulate the density of the predator on the crop which would explain why this facultative predator does not cause damage in the open Mediterranean greenhouses in comparison with that reported for northern latitudes (Sampson & Jacobson 1999), where the use of M. pygmaeus for biological control is considered risky because of its capacity to damage certain ornamental and tomato varieties (Gabarra et al. 2004). Greenhouses in Uruguay, and in many other South American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia), are open like in the Mediterranean, so the predatory activity of T cucurbitaceus could be of great importance in the implementation of biological control.

In the case of Miridae, many studies have focused on the advantages and limitations of a strictly phytophagous diet (Perdikis & Lykouressis 1997, 2000, 2004; Lykouressis et al. 2008; Ingegno et al. 2011; Portillo et al. 2012) or, alternatively, a strictly zoophagus diet (Iriarte & Castane 2001; Castane & Zapata 2005; Castane et al. 2011). It is observed in omnivore predators that when the usual prey diet is supplemented with plant food, their development rate generally increases and so do the other biological parameters such as survive rate, longevity and/or fecundity of adults (Eubanks & Styrsky 2005). These observations confirm that, the food intake has a strong effect on the growth rate of omnivore and its prey.

The aim of the current study is to determine the developmental times of the immature instars, longevity, fecundity, nymphal mortality, adult survival and prey consumption of T. cucurbitaceus on different host plants in the presence and absence of insect prey. Given the limited knowledge available about this predator, characterizing the effect of different trophic regimes on its biology could contribute both to the knowledge of trophic connections, a central element in the structure of ecosystems, and also to improved management of these pests and the utilization of this species as a biological control agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Insect Colony and Experimental Conditions

Specimens of Tupiocoris cucurbitaceus, T. vaporariorum and Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) used in the experiments were mass-reared in the Faculty of Agronomy (Montevideo, Uruguay) laboratory. Tupiocoris cucurbitaceus was collected in 2008 at the Faculty of Agronomy park (S34[degrees] 54'-W 56[degrees] 12') on yacon (Smallanthus connatus (Spreng.) H. Robinson) (Asterales: Asteraceae) and mass-reared on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L, Virginia, cv. K-326; Solanales: Solanaceae). Experiments were carried out in controlled environmental conditions (26 [+ or -] 1[degrees]C, 83 [+ or -] 10% RH and a photoperiod of 16:8 h L:D.

Determination of Embryonic Development

Twenty-five fertilized T. cucurbitaceus females were placed for 24 h on a tobacco plant 'sprinkled' with eggs of E. kuehniella as a food supplement. This plant was placed in a 35 x 15 x 30 cm (length x width x height) glass box covered by fine muslin to prevent high humidity accumulation (Perdikis & Lykouressis 2000). Given the difficulty of observing the eggs, because, as in other Miridae species, the females insert these into the plant tissue leaving only the operculum visible (Fauvel et al. 1987; Gemeno et al. 2007), once the mirids were placed on the plants, daily observations were conducted to determine the occurrence of first nymphal instars in order to determine the duration of embryo development.

Effect of Diet on Nymphal Development

First nymphal instars individuals of Tupiocoris cucurbitaceus were placed individually in 9 x 1.5 cm (diam x height) plastic dishes and fed on host plants of tomato or tobacco in presence or absence of prey (T vaporariorum or E. kuehniella), resulting in 6 experimental treatments: 1) one piece of tobacco leaf 1 x 8 cm, 2) one piece of tobacco leaf 1 x 8 cm + E. kuehniella eggs (ad libitum), 3) one tomato leaflet, 4) one tomato leaflet + E. kuehniella eggs (ad libitum), 5) one piece of tobacco leaf 1 x 8 cm + T. vaporariorum eggs (ad libitum) and 6) one tomato leaflet + T. vaporariorum eggs (ad libitum).

A ball of wet paper towel was placed on each dish to keep the vegetable material hydrated and as water source for the mirids. The paper towel was wetted daily. The plates were placed in a glass cage 21 x 34 x 14 cm (length x width x height) that held a container with salt-saturated water in order to maintain moisture conditions (65 [+ or -] 5% RH). Food was offered on a daily basis and the presence of exuvia from molting was looked for at the same time.

Effect of Diet on Adult Longevity

The effect of diet on longevity (length of adult life) of T. cucurbitaceus was determined from individuals that reached the adult stage for each of the 6 diets detailed above. The adults were kept on the same diet which they had been given during preimaginal development, and the number of days which the mirids lived as adults were counted.

Effect of Diet on T. cucurbitaceus Nymph Mortality and Adult Survival

Mirid nymph mortality was determined in each of the 6 treatments as the percentage of individuals that did not reach the adult stage. The mortality of adult mirids was daily verified in all 6 treatments, in order to establish the number of surviving individuals. Observations were finished when all individuals died.

Adult Fecundity of T. cucurbitaceus

Ten fertilized T. cucurbitaceus females from a mass breeding facility were placed on tobacco plants 'sprinkled' with E. kuehniella eggs. One hundred T. cucurbitaceus nymphs were raised to the fifth instar, which is when mirids exhibit sexual dimorphism (Yonke 1991). Then, thirty pairs were formed (1 [male] + 1 [female]) and placed individually on tobacco plants with E. kuehniella eggs. Following Fauvel et al. (1987), the pairs were changed to a different plant every 7 days. The plants were isolated in transparent plastic tubes covered by fine muslin. Fertility was determined from daily observations of the number of nymphs found on plants. AH observations were made using an optical microscope (Nikon SMZ-1B x 35) and a hand lens (Carl Zeiss Jena x 8).

Effect of Diet on Prey Consumption

The number of prey consumed (T vaporariorum and E. kuehniella eggs) in zoophytophagous diets was recorded daily during the nymphal and adult stage mirids. New prey were added daily.

Statistical Analysis

A Factorial arrangement analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine differences in embryonic and nymphal development time, and longevity. The separation of means was analyzed using a Tukey-Kramer test with a = 0.05 as the threshold for significance differences. Comparison of prey consumption and fecundity was performed using a t-test for comparison of two means ([alpha] = 0.05). Nymph mortality was analyzed using a Generalized Linear Model, assuming a binomial distribution for the variable 'number of dead nymphs of the total number of nymphs studied'. The Genmod procedure of the SAS/STAT package, version 9.1.3 was used (SAS/ STAT 2005). Adult survival was analyzed using the product limit estimator (Kaplan-Meier). The curves were compared using the generalized Wilcoxon test by Gehan ([alpha] = 0.05).

RESULTS

Duration of Development (Eggs, Nymph and Adult Stages)

The duration of T. cucurbitaceus egg development on tobacco plants was 10.90 days [10.82; 10.98] (IC 95%). The duration of the nymphal stage of T. cucurbitaceaus was affected by both the diet being consumed and by the plant it was living on (F = 19.04, df = 1, 94, P < 0.0001) as well as by the presence or absence of prey (F = 124.62, df = 2, 94, P < 0.0001), with a significant plant * prey interaction (F = 3.18, df = 1, 94, P = 0.0460). The nymphs which were fed plants and prey showed a lesser development time compared to those fed only on plants (P < 0.0001). The prey type (T. vaporariorum or E. kuehniella) had not an effect on development time (considering P < 0.05), but the type of plant (tomato or tobacco) did have an effect when the diet of the nymphs did not include prey. The duration of the nymphal stage for individuals which were only fed plants varied from 20.8 days on tobacco plants to 18.3 days for tomato plants (P < 0.0001) (Table 1).

When the duration of each of the nymphal instars was analyzed separately, it was proven that plant type affected development at the second instar (P = 0.0141), third instar (P = 0.0401) and fourth instar (P = 0.0468), but not the other instars (first and fifth instars) (considering P < 0.05), whereas that prey influenced development times of all instars (P < 0.0001). Plant*prey interaction was not significant at 95% in any of the cases.

First instar nymphs molted sooner when they were fed T. vaporariorum eggs than when no prey was provided, both on tomato (P = 0.0100) and on tobacco (P = 0.0464). This effect was not found when E. kuehniella eggs were provided, on either on tomato or tobacco (considering P < 0.05). Second instar nymphs fed with only tobacco had a longer development time than if the diet was supplemented with T. vaporariorum eggs (P = 0.0028) or E. kuehniella eggs (P = 0.0468). There was no change in the duration of the second nymphal instar on tomato plants through the addition of E. kuehniella eggs (P = 0.1180) or T. vaporariorum eggs (P = 0.2180). The development time of third instar nymphs on tobacco was reduced with the addition of T. vaporariorum eggs (P = 0.0022) or E. kuehniella eggs (P < 0.0001). By contrast, third instar nymphs which fed only on tomato had a longer development time than those which received E. kuehniella eggs (P = 0.0025), but no difference was found in their development time when compared with those fed T. vaporariorum eggs (P = 0.1627). Fourth instar nymphs fed only with tobacco had a longer duration compared to those fed with T. vaporariorum eggs (P < 0.0001) or E. kuehniella eggs (P = 0.0179). This was also observed in mirids of the same instar fed on tomato; the duration was reduced when T vaporariorum (P < 0.0001) or E. kuehniella eggs (P = 0.0006) were added. Fifth instar nymphs on tobacco showed no differences in the duration of development with or without the addition of eggs, both for T vaporariorum (P = 0.6135) or E. kuehniella (P = 0.9705). However, their development on tomato plants was slower when no prey was added than with T. vaporariorum or E. kuehniella eggs (P = 0.0002 in both cases). None of the durations of development time of any nymphal instars varied depending on the type of prey offered (considering P < 0.05) (Table 1).

The longevity of T cucurbitaceus adults, when T vaporariorum eggs were available, was 20.8 days on tobacco and 23.2 days on tomato plants. These periods were longer compared with those of individuals fed exclusively on plants (4.5 days on tobacco and 7.0 days on tomato respectively) (P < 0.0001). Adults fed with E. kuehniella lived an average of 21.3 days on tomato plants and 13.9 days on tobacco, differing from those without prey on tomato (P < 0.0001) and tobacco (P = 0.0062) respectively. The total duration of the lifetime of the mirid (nymph plus adult stage) was not affected by plant type (P = 0.1528) but it was affected by the addition of prey (P = 0.0002). However, no difference was noted between adding E. kuehniella or T vaporariorum eggs (P = 0.0825). An increase in the total life duration of T. cucurbitaceus compared with individuals without added prey was only evident when T. vaporariorum was added to tomato plants (P = 0.0128) (Table 1).

Effect of Diet on T. cucurbitaceus Nymph Mortality and Adult Survival

Diet influenced the mortality of nymphs (F = 10.26, df = 5, 181, P < 0.0001). Nymphs fed with T. vaporariorum eggs on tobacco or tomato plants had lower mortality than those not fed prey on either tobacco (P = 0.0007) or tomato (P < 0.0001). When E. kuehniella eggs were added to tomato leaves, nymph mortality was lower than when no prey was provided (P = 0.0007). However, the addition of eggs did not affect mortality if the nymphs were on tobacco leaves, compared to when no prey was provided (P = 0.0631) (Table 2).

The assessed diets affected the survival of adult mirids (generalized Wilcoxon test by Gehan, ([chi square] = 55.98, P = 0.000). In pairwise comparison of treatments (Kaplan-Meier method) no significant differences were found when mirids fed only on tobacco or tomato. Though survival increased either on one plant or the other when prey were added (both E. kuehniella or T. vaporariorum). No differences were reported adding one prey or the other on each one of the plants. Individuals on tomato with prey added (both E. kuehniella or T. vaporariorum), had a greater survival than those fed on tobacco with E. kuehniella, whereas that no differences were registered with mirids fed on tobacco with T. vaporariorum (Table 3) (Fig. 1).

Prey Consumption

The average number and range of E. kuehniella eggs consumed by T. cucurbitaceus during its life was 137 (114-160) on tomato and 149 (81-218) on tobacco (P = 0.7004). When the diet included T. vaporariorum eggs consumption ranged from 732 eggs (603-828) on tobacco and 712 eggs (600-824) on tomato (P = 0.8184) (Fig. 2).

Adult Fecundity of T. cucurbitaceus

In the first week of oviposition fecundity of T cucurbitaceus females reached an average of 37.7 eggs. In the second week fecundity was 39.7 eggs, in the third week it was 38.7 eggs and in the fourth week it was 23.6 eggs (Table 4). In summary, females deposited between 74 and 205 eggs in adulthood, and between 3 and 7 eggs per day.

DISCUSSION

The duration of T. cucurbitaceus embryonic development observed in this study (10.9 days) was lower but close to the 11.4 days reported by Fauvel et al. (1987) for M. pygmaeus on tomato plants at 25[degrees]C, 60% RH and a photoperiod of 16:8 h L:D and the 11.8 days for Dicyphus tamaninii Wanger on tobacco at 25 [+ or -] 1[degrees]C, 70 [+ or -] 10% RH and 16:8 h L:D reported by Iriarte & Castane (2001)

A shorter preimaginal developmental time with the addition of T. vaporariorum to the diet was observed for the mirid M. pygmaeus on eggplant plants, and a host plant effect was observed in the absence of prey, as duration was less on tomato plants than on beans or tobacco (Perdikis & Lykouressis 2000). Meanwhile, Fauvel et al. (1987) indicated that M. pygmaeus presented a shorter preimaginal developmental time when E. kuehniella eggs were provided as prey than when T vaporariorum eggs were supplied. In the case of T. cucurbitaceaus, there are no previous studies and our study found no differences in the duration of the nymph development depending on the type of prey added.

The reduction of T. cucurbitaceaus nymphal mortality with the addition of prey coincides with reports by Perdikis & Lykouressis (2000) and Lykouressis et al. (2001) who indicated that the survival of M. pygmaeus was greater when prey were provided than when none was available. Meanwhile, Lucas & Alomar (2001) indicated that D. tamaninii individuals fed exclusively on tomato leaves failed to complete their development. Fauvel et al (1987) reported a total fecundity of 122 eggs per female for M. pygmaeus and daily fecundity of 3 eggs per day when fed with E. kuehniella eggs on Pelargonium peltatum L. (Geraniaceae) at 25[degrees]C. At the same temperature, Castane & Zapata (2005) obtained a fecundity of 7.03 eggs per day with the same species fed on tobacco leaves and E. kuehniella eggs. Iriarte & Castane (2001) reported a fecundity of 4.45 eggs per day for the same mirid with a meat diet prepared according to De Clercq et al. (1998). Our results showed that the quality of the diet influences the development period and longevity of T. cucurbitaceus, with nymphal instar being shortest and the adult stage being the longest when T. vaporariorum or E. kuehniella eggs were provided, on tomato or tobacco leaves, than when the leaves were the only available food source. Meanwhile, predator nymphal mortality was less and adult survival was greater when prey were provided.

When using biological control, it is observed that an omnivore agent feeding only on a plant species reaches a lower population density than when it is living on a mixed diet (with prey) (Garay et al. 2012). That result is also found in cases when plants provide food for natural enemies of phytophagous insects (Wackers 2005; Young et al. 1997). In this kind of mutualism it is an important point for the plant that the cost of defense is less than its benefit (Szilagyi et al. 2009). Here, the cost for the plant is its biomass consumed by the omnivore (with or without the presence of the herbivore), and its benefit is the biomass the herbivore would have consumed in absence of the predator. Garay et al. (2012) formulated the hypothesis that the food provided by the plant for its mutual omnivore is poor at least in one of the essential nutrients, and the pest of the plant is rich in this nutrient. This hypothesis might be chemically tested.

As one of the elements of a complex system, T. cucurbitaceous could be a promising candidate for complementing more specialized parasitoids in whitefly biological control programs. Or, taking into account that this species is present in nature, facilitating the colonization of greenhouse crops from vegetation, as has been done with M. pygmaeus (Albajes & Alomar 1999). Applied studies would be necessary to establish the population level reached by the pests under such conditions and also the stability of the system. The present study is one of the very few conducted on T cucurbitaceous up to the present and it is hoped that it will prompt further complementary research.

Caption: Fig. 1. Survival curves of Tupiucoris cucurbitaceous under different food diets (T1 to T6). T1 = one piece of tobacco leaf, T2 = one piece of tobacco leaf + E. kuehniella eggs, T3 = one tomato leaflet, T4 = one tomato leaflet + E. kuehniella eggs, T5 = one piece of tobacco leaf + T. vaporariorum eggs and T6 = one tomato leaflet + T. vaporariorum eggs. Survival was analyzed using the product limit estimator (Kaplan-Meier). Different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).

Caption: Fig. 2. Number of eggs (E. kuehniella or T. vaporariorum) consumed by T. cucurbitaceus during its life on tomato and tobacco leaves.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Diego Carpintero (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia", Buenos Aires, Argentina) for identifying the T. cucurbitaceus individuals collected in Uruguay.

REFERENCES CITED

ALBAJES, R., AND ALOMAR, o. 1999. Current and potential uses of polyphagous predators, pp. 265-275 In R. Albajes, M. L. Gullino, J. C. van Lenteren and Y. Elad [eds.], Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse Crops. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 545 pp.

ALOMAR, O., RIUDAVETS, J., AND CASTANE, C. 2006. Macrolophus caliginosus in the biological control of Bemisia tabaci on greenhouse melons. Biol. Control 36: 154-162.

ARIM, M., AND MARQUET, P. A. 2004. Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology. Ecol. Lett. 7: 557-564.

ARNO, J., ALBAJES. R., AND GABARRA, R. 2006. Withinplant distribution and sampling of single and mixed infestations of Bemisia tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in winter tomato crops. J. Econ. Entomol. 99: 331-340.

BADO, S. G., CERRI, A. M., AND VILELLA, F. 2005. Fauna insectil asociada a cultivos de dos especies de Physalis (Solonaceae) en Argentina. Bol. Sanid. Veg., Plagas 31: 321-333.

BI, J. L., TOSCANO, N.C., AND BALLMER, G. R. 2002. Greenhouse and field evaluation of six novel insecticides against the greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum on strawberries. Crop Prot. 21: 49-55.

BONATO, O., COUTON, L., AND FARGUES, J. 2006. Feeding preference of Macrolophus caliginosus on Bemisia tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum. J. Econ. Entomol. 99: 1143-1151.

BRODEUR, J., AND BOIVIN, G. 2006. Trophic and guild interaction in biological control. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 239.

BYRNE, D. N., AND BELLOWS, T. S. 1991. Whitefly biology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 6: 431-457.

CASTANE, C., AND ZAPATA, R. 2005. Rearing the predatory bug Macrolophus caliginosus on a meat-based diet. Biol. Control 34: 66-72.

CASTANE, C., ARNO, J., GABARRA, R., AND ALOMAR, O. 2011. Plant damage to vegetable crops by zoophytophagous mired predators. Biol. Control 59: 22-29.

CARPINTERO D. L., AND CARVALHO J. M. C. 1993. An annotated list of the miridae of the Argentine Republic (Hemiptera). Rev. Brasileira Biol. 53: 397-420.

CARVALHO, J. C. M. 1947. Mirideos Neotropicais; XXVIII. Generos Propomiris Berg. Lampethusa Distant, Cyrtopeltis Fieber e Dicyphus Fieber (Hemiptera). Bol. Mus. Nacl. Rio de Janeiro 77: 1-40.

CARVALHO, J. C. M., AND AFONSO, C. R. S. 1977. Mirideos Neotropicais, CCVIII: Sobre uma colecao enviada para estudo pela academia de ciencias da California (Hemiptera). Rev. Brasileira Biol. 37: 7-16.

COLL, M., AND GUERSHON, M. 2002. Omnivory in terrestrial arthropods: Mixing plant and prey diets. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 267-297.

DE BARRO, P. J., HART, P. J., AND MORTON, R. 2000. The biology of two Eretmocerus spp. (Haldeman) and three Encarsia spp. Forster and their potential as biological control agents of Bemisia tabaci biotype B in Australia. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 94: 93-102.

DE CLERCQ, P., MERLEVEDE, F., AND TIRRY, L. 1998. Unnatural prey and artificial diets for rearing Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Biol. Control 12: 137-142.

ELLSWORTH, P. C., AND MARTINEZ-CARRILLO, J. L. 2001. IPM of Bemisia tabaci: a case study from North America. Crop Prot. 20: 853-869.

EUBANKS, M. D., AND STYRSKY, J. D. 2005. Effects of plant feeding on the performance of omnivorous "predator" pp. 148-177 In F. L. Wackers, P. C. J. van Rijn, and J. Bruin [eds.], Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: A protected mutualism and its applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. UK. pp. 256.

FATEN HAMDI, F., CLOUET, C., STREITO, J-C., BONATO, O., AND GAUTHIER, N. 2012. Isolation and characterisation of 9 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the predatory bug Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Hemiptera: Miridae) using pyrosequencing technology. Permanent Genetic Resources Note 12: 972-974.

FAUVEL, G., MALAUSA, J. C., AND KASPAR, B. 1987. Etude en laboratoire des principales caracteristiques biologiques de Macrolophus caliginosus (Hetroptera: Miridae). Entomophaga 32: 529-543.

GABARRA, R., ALOMAR, O., CASTANE, C., GOULA, M., AND ALBAJES, R. 2004. Movement of greenhouse whitefly and its predators between in- and outside of Mediterranean greenhouses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 102: 341-348.

GARAY, J., VARGA, Z., CABELLO, T., AND GAMEZ, M. 2012. Optimal nutrient foraging strategy of an omnivore: Liebig's law determining numerical response. J. Theor. Biol. 310: 31-42.

GEMENO, C., ALOMAR, O., RIUDAVETS, J., AND CASTANE, C. 2007. Mating periodicity and post-mating refractory period in the zoophytophagus plant bug Macrolophus caliginosus (Heteroptera: Miridae). Eur. J. Entomol. 104: 715-720.

HODDLE, M. S. 2004. Biological control of whiteflies on ornamental crops, pp. 149-170 In K. M. Heinz, R. G. Van Driesche, M. P. Parrella [eds.), Biocontrol in protected culture. Ball Publishing, Batavia, Illinios, USA. pp. 552.

HODGES, G. S., AND EVANS, G. A. 2005. An identification guide to the whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) of the Southeastern United States. Florida Entomol. 88: 518-534.

HOLT, R. D., AND POLIS, G. A. 1997. A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. American Nat. 149: 745-764.

INGEGNO, L. B., PANSA, M. G., AND TAVELLA, L. 2011. Plant preference in the zoophytophagous generalist predator Macrolophus pygmaeus (Heteroptera: Miridae). Biol. Control 58: 174-181.

IRIARTE, J., AND CASTANE, C. 2001. Artificial rearing of Dicyphus tamaninii (Heteroptera: Miridae) on a meat-based diet. Biol. Control 22: 98-102.

JAZZAR, C., AND HAMMAD, E. A. F. 2004. Efficacy of multiple biocontrol agents against the sweet potato whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on tomato. J. Appl. Entomol. 128: 188-194.

LUCAS, E., AND ALOMAR, O. 2001. Macrolophus caliginosus (Wagner) as an intraguild prey for the zoophytophagous Dicyphus tamaninii Wagner (Heteroptera: Miridae). Biol. Control 20: 147-152.

LUCAS, E., AND ALOMAR, O. 2002. Impact of the presence of Dicyphus tamaninii Wagner (Heteroptera: Miridae) on whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) predation by Macrolophus caliginosus (Wagner) (Heteroptera: Miridae). Biol. Control 25: 123-128.

LYKOURESSIS, D., GIATROPOULOS, A., PERDIKIS, D., AND FAVAS C. 2008. Assessing the suitability of non cultivated plants and associated insect prey as food sources for the omnivorous predator Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae). Biol. Control 44: 142-148.

LYKOURESSIS, D., PERDIKIS, D., AND MICHALAKI, M. 2001. Nymphal development and survival of Mcrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Hemiptera: Miridae) on two eggplant varieties as affected by temperature and presence/absence of prey. Biol. Control 20: 222-227.

MALEZIEUX, S., GIRARDET, C., NAVEZ, B., AND CHEY-RIAS, J. 1995. Contre l'aleurode des serres en cultures de tomates sous abris utilisation et developpement de Macrolophus caliginosus associe a Encarsia formosa. Phytoma 471: 29-32.

NARANJO, S. E., AND ELLSWORTH, P. C. 2001. Special issue: Challenges and opportunities for pest man agement of Bemisia tabaci in the new century. Crop Prot. 20: 707-869.

OHASHI, D. V., AND URDANPILLETA, J. D. 2003. Interaccion entre insectos perjudiciales y beneficos en el cultivo de tabaco de Misiones, Argentina. Rev. Investig. Agrop. 32: 113-124.

PARK, J. D., KIM, D. I., AND PARK, U. 1998. Occurrence and within-plant distribution of Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) and Encarsia formosa (Gahan) in greenhouse. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 37: 117-121.

PARK, J. J., SHIN, K. I., AND CHO, K. 2004. Evaluation of data transformations and validation of a spatial model for spatial dependency of Trialeurodes vaporariorum populations in a cherry tomato greenhouse. J. Asia-Pacific Entomol. 7: 289-295.

PASINI, C., D'AQUILA, F., GANDOLFO, M., COSTANZI, M., AND MIRTO, L. 1998. Macrolophus caliginosus in biological control. Crop Prot. 27: 43-46.

PERDIKIS, D., AND LYKOURESSIS, D. 1997. Rate of development and mortality of nymphal stages of the predator Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur feeding on various preys and host plants. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 20: 241-248.

PERDIKIS, D., AND LYKOURESSIS, D. 2000. Effects of various items, host plants, and temperatures on the development and survival of Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Hemiptera: Miridae). Biol. Control 17: 55-60.

PERDIKIS, D., AND LYKOURESSIS, D. 2004. Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae) population parameters and biological characteristics when feeding on eggplant and tomato without prey. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1291-1298.

PERDIKIS, D., MARGARITOPOULOS, J. T., STAMATIS, C., MAMURIS, Z., LYKOURESSIS, D. P., TSITSIPIS, J. A., AND PEKAS, A. 2003. Discrimination of the closely related biocontrol agents Macrolophus melanotoma (Hemiptera: Miridae) and M. pygmaeus using mitochondrial DNA analysis. Bull. Entomol. Res. 93: 507-514.

PILKINGTON, L. J., MESSELINK, G., VAN LENTEREN, J. C., LE MOTTEE, K. 2010. "Protected Biological Control" --Biological pest management in the greenhouse industry. Biol. Control 52: 216-220.

POLIS, G. A., AND HOLT, R. D. 1992. lntraguild predation: the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 151-154.

PORTILLO, N., ALOMAR, O., AND WACKERS, F. 2012. Nectarivory by the plant-tissue feeding predator Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Heteroptera: Miridae): Nutritional redundancy or nutritional benefit? J. Insect Physiol. 58: 397-401.

SAMPSON, C., AND JACOBSON, R. J. 1999. Macrolophus caliginosus Wagner (Heteroptera: Miridae): a pred ator causing damage to UK tomatoes. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 22: 213-216.

SAMPSON, C., AND KING V. J. 1996. Macrolophus caliginosus, field establishment and pest control effect in protected tomatoes. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 19: 143-146.

SAS/STAT 2005. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina. USA. pp. 220.

SPINOLA, M. 1852. FAUNA CHILENA; MIRIDAE. v. 7, pp. 183-199 In C. Gay [ed.] Historia fisica y politica de Chile; zoologia. Casa del autor, Paris, Francia. pp. 541.

STANSLY, P. A., CALVO, J., AND URBANEJA, a. 2005. Release rates for control of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) biotype "Q" with Eretmocerus mundus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in greenhouse tomato and pepper. Biol. Control 35: 124-133

STANSLY, P. A., SANCHEZ, P. A., RODRIGUEZ, J. M., CANIZARES, F., NIETO, A., LOPEZ LEYVA, M. J., FAJARDO, M., SUAREZ, V., AND URBANEJA, A. 2004. Prospects for biological control of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera, Aleyrodidae) in greenhouse tomatoes of southern Spain. Crop Prot. 23: 701-712.

SZILAGYI, A., SCHEURING, I., EDWARDS, D. P., ORIVER, J., AND YU, D. W. 2009. The evolution of intermediate castration virulence and ant coexistence in spatially structured environment. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1-11.

TROTTIN-CAUDAL, Y., AND MILLOT, P. 1994. Lutte integree contre les ravageurs sur tomate sous abri, situation et perspectives en France. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 17: 5-13.

VAN LENTEREN, J. C., AND NOLDUS, L. P. J. J. 1990. Whitefly-plant relationships: behavioural and ecological aspects. pp. 47-89 In D. Gerling [ed.], Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest status and management. Intercept Ltd, Andover, UK. 348 pp.

VAN LENTEREN, J. C., VAN ROERMUND, H. J. W., SUETTER-LIN, S. 1996. Biological control of greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorm): how does it work? Biol. Control 6: 1-10.

VAN SCHELT, J., LETARD, M., AND AUCOUTURIER, C. 1995. The use of Macrolophus caliginosus as a whitefly predator in protected crops, pp. 515-521 In D. Gerling, and R. T. Mayer [eds.], Bemisia: Taxonomy, biology, damage, control and management, Intercept Ltd, Andover. UK. 702 pp.

WACKERS, F. L. 2005. Suitability of (extra-) floral nectar, pollen, and honeydew as insect food source pp. 17-74 In F. L. Wackers, P. C. J. van Rijn, and J. Bruin [eds.], Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: A protected mutualism and its applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. UK, 256 pp.

YONKE, T. R. 1991. Order Hemiptera pp. 22-65 In F. W. Stehr [ed.] Immature Insects. vol 2. Kendall/Hunt publishing, Dubuque, Iowa, USA. 975 pp.

YOUNG, T. P., STUBBLEFIELD, C. H., AND ISBELL, L. A. 1997. Ants on swollen-thorn acacias: species coexistence in a simple system. Oecologia 109: 98-107.

JUAN P. BURLA (1), GABRIELA GRILLE (1), MARIA E. LORENZO (1), JORGE FRANCO (2), OLIVIER BONATO (3) AND CESAR BASSO (1) *

(1) Departamento de Proteccion Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad de la Republica. Av. Garzon 780, 12900 Montevideo, Uruguay

(2) Departamento de Biometria, Estadistica y Computacion, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad de la Republica, Av. Garzon 780, 12900 Montevideo, Uruguay

(3) UMR 5175, Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et evolutive, Laboratoire de Zoogeographie, Universite Paul Valery Montpellier III, route de Mende, 34199 Montpellier cedex 5, France

* Corresponding author; E-mail: cbasso@adinet.com.uy

TABLE 1. DURATION (DAYS) OF TUPIOCORIS CUCURBITACEUS DEVELOPMENT
EXPOSED TO DIFFERENT DIETS.

Treatment           1st instar     2nd instar

Plant       Prey   N       D      N       D
                        (days)         (days)

Tob          --    36   4.08 b    25   3.46 b
Tob          Ek    23   3.57 ab   22   2.43 a
Tom          --    45   3.98 b    39   2.69 ab
Tom          Ek    22   3.23 ab   20   1.99 a
Tob          Tv    25   3.16 ab   25   2.22 a
Tom          Tv    27   2.96 a    25   2.10 a

Treatment    3rd instar     4th instar     5th instar

Plant       N       D      N       D      N       D
                 (days)         (days)         (days)

Tob         17   3.59 c    11   4.82 c    9    4.20 ab
Tob         21   2.24 a    18   3.33 ab   18   3.83 a
Tom         29   3.00 ab   22   4.23 be   15   5.13 b
Tom         18   2.06 a    18   2.61 a    17   3.33 a
Tob         24   2.58 ab   24   2.50 a    24   3.50 a
Tom         24   2.46 ab   23   2.43 a    22   3.43 a

Treatment       Total        Total Life
             Development        span

Plant       N       D      N       D
                 (days)          (days)

Tob         9    20.78 c   9     25.3 a
Tob         18   14.22 a   15   28.1 abc
Tom         10   18.30 b   10   25.5 ab
Tom         17   12.94 a   15   34.1 abc
Tob         24   13.67 a   21   34.5 abc
Tom         22   13.23 a   22    36.4 c

D = duration, Tob = Tobacco, Tom = Tomato, Ek = E. kuehniella eggs,
Tv = T. vaporariorum eggs. Means followed vertically by the same
letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05) in the
Tukey-Kramer test.

TABLE 2. MORTALITY (MEAN [+ or -] SE) OF T. CUCURBITACEUS
DURING NYMPHAL DEVELOPMENT.

Plant   Prey         Mortality

Tob     --     0.71 [+ or -] 0.07 ab
Tob     Ek     0.35 [+ or -] 0.10 bc
Tom     --     0.79 [+ or -] 0.06 a
Tom     Ek     0.19 [+ or -] 0.09 c
Tob     Tv     0.12 [+ or -] 0.07 c
Tom     Tv     0.11 [+ or -] 0.06 c

Tob = Tobacco, Tom = Tomato, Ek = E. kuehniella eggs, Tv =
T. vaporariorum eggs. Means followed by the same letter are
not significantly different (P < 0.05) in the Tukey-Kramer test.

TABLE 3. PAIRWISE COMPARISON OF TWO SURVIVAL CURVES
OF TUPIUCORIS CUCURBITACEOUS ADULTS ON
DIFFERENT FOOD DIETS (TI TO T6). SURVIVAL
WAS ANALYZED USING THE PRODUCT LIMIT ESTIMATOR
(KAPLAN-MEIER). TL = ONE PIECE
OF TOBACCO LEAF, T2 = ONE PIECE OF TOBACCO
LEAF + E. KUEHNIELLA EGGS, T3 = ONE TOMATO
LEAFLET, T4 = ONE TOMATO LEAFLET + E. KUEHNIELLA
EGGS, T5 = ONE PIECE OF TOBACCO
LEAF + T VAPORARIORUM EGGS AND T6 = ONE
TOMATO LEAFLET + T VAPORARIORUM EGGS.

Comparison    dl      F       P

T1-T2        22-41   1.76   0.012
T1-T3        46-41   1.08   0.356
T1-T4        18-41   2.84   0.000
T1-T5        23-41   3.38   0.000
T1-T6        24-41   3.53   0.000
T2-T3        46-22   1.75   0.011
T2-T4        18-22   1.68   0.045
T2-T5        23-22   1.61   0.053
T2-T6        24-22   2.18   0.004
T3-T4        18-46   2.83   0.000
T3-T5        23-46   3.38   0.000
T3-T6        24-46   3.49   0.000
T4-T5        23-18   1.02   0.468
T4-T6        24-18   1.08   0.398
T5-T6        24-23   1.36   0.140

TABLE 4. FERTILITY OF TUPIUCORIS CUCURBITACEUS ON TOBACCO PLANTS.

Oviposition   N pairs   N nymphs      IC 95%      Nymphs/day
period

Week 1          19        37.7     [27.3; 48.1]    3.9-6.9
Week 2          17        39.7     [26.7; 52.7]    3.8-7.5
Week 3           9        38.7     [10.8; 66.6]    1.5-9.5
Week 4          10        23.6      [9.7; 37.5]    1.4-5.4


----------

Please note: Some tables or figures were omitted from this article.
COPYRIGHT 2014 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Burla, Juan P.; Grille, Gabriela; Lorenzo, Maria E.; Franco, Jorge; Bonato, Olivier; Basso, Cesar
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:3URUG
Date:Dec 1, 2014
Words:6062
Previous Article:Sexual dimorphism of Rhyssomatus subtilis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).
Next Article:How many primary parasitoid species attack nymphs of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) in Punjab, Pakistan?
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters