Printer Friendly

Effect of aqueous stem bark extract of Khaya senegalensis on some biochemical, haematological, and histopathological parameters of rats.

1. Introduction

The therapeutic value of medicinal plants has long been exploited for the management of various disease conditions in traditional practice. This practice has gained appreciable acceptance in health care delivery in developing and developed nations with the notion that they are relatively harmless, but research is beginning to show that some of them may be toxic.

Khaya senegalensis (Desr.) A. Juss (Family: Meliaceae) is a tree that is widely distributed in the sub-Saharan savannah from Senegal to Sudan and Uganda. It is a round evergreen crown of dark shiny foliage, pinnate leaves, and characteristic round capsules that grows up to 40 m high [1]. The therapeutic value of Khaya senegalensis has been recognized in different systems of traditional medicine for the treatment of

various conditions. The decoction of the stem bark extract is commonly used for treating jaundice, dermatoses, malaria, fever, mucous diarrhea, and venereal diseases as well as for hookworm infection and a taeniacide remedy [2, 3]. Khaya senegalensis extracts have been reported to exhibit anti-inflammatory effects [4] as well as anti-bacterial[5], anti-helmintic [6], antitumor, antioxidant [7] and anti-plasmodial activities [8]. The stem bark extract and the chemical constituent profile have been the subject of extensive phytochemical and pharmacological investigations since the 1960s [911]. Despite the extensive research on the stem bark extract of Khaya senegalensis, a dearth of information on the toxicological profile of this plant still exists. This work is therefore designed to evaluate the acute and subchronic toxicity effects of the extract on the liver and kidney.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials. Stem bark of K. senegalensis was collected from the main campus of Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, (130 21' 16" N and 50 5' 37" E) in the month of June 2011. The plant was identified by a taxonomist, Mal. A.M. Umar from the Botany Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, and a voucher specimen (UDUS/VS/2011/21) was prepared and deposited in the herbarium of the same department.

2.2. Experimental Animals. Albino male rats weighing 150-200 g were purchased from the Animal House, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria. They were housed in metal cages and allowed free access to a standard laboratory pellet diet (ECWA Feed Nig Ltd.) and water ad libitum under a 12-hour light-dark cycle throughout the experimental period.

2.3. Preparation and Extraction of Plant Samples. Plant materials were washed and air-dried at room temperature until a constant weight was obtained. The samples were ground using a pestle and mortar and the powdered samples were then bagged and stored in plastic bags until required.

The plant sample was separately placed in an Erlenmeyer flask and one liter of distilled water was added into the flask and it was allowed to soak for a minimum of 24 hours. 5% w/v of the plant material was prepared. The mixture was filtered using a piece of clean, sterile Muslin cloth to remove debris and then filtered on Whatman filter paper. The resultant filtrate was evaporated to dryness [12] and the percentage recovery was calculated (13.3%).

2.4. Acute Toxicity Study. Acute oral toxicity was performed Using the up-and down-procedure of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [13]. This procedure involves the limit and main test, which was also used for the selection of a starting dose as well as determination of [LD.sub.50] of the testing material.

2.5. Subchronic Toxicity Study. Animals were divided into six groups of five animals each. The test substance was administered orally to the rats in groups II-IV in a gradation of 400, 800, 1200, 1600, and 2000 mg/kg body weight per day for 28 days, while group I (control group) animals were given an equivalent volume of normal saline orally for the same period of 28 days under the same conditions.

The body weight changes were monitored weekly throughout the experimental period. On the 29th day, after an overnight fast, the rats were anaesthetized in a chloroform vapour and blood samples were collected from the animals by cardiac puncture into labeled Vacutainers for biochemical and haematological assays. Subsequently, the animals were sacrificed by decapitation; the organs (kidney, liver, and heart) were removed, weighed, and then fixed in 10% formalin for histopathological examinations [13].

2.6. Biochemical and Haematological Analysis. Serum total protein was determined using the biuret method; cupric ions in the biuret reagent react with the peptide bonds of the protein molecule in an alkaline solution to form a blue colored complex [14]. Albumin was determined using the Bromocresol Green method; albumin binds with Bromocresol Green in an acidic medium to form a blue-green complex whose colour is proportional to the concentration of albumin in the serum [15]. Transaminase activity (aspartate amino transferase (AST) and alanine, aminotransferase (ALT)) was determined using the Reitman and Frankel [16] method; ALT was measured by monitoring the concentration of pyruvated hydrazone that is formed with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine while AST was measured by monitoring the concentration of oxaloacetate hydrazone that is formed with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was determined using the colorimetric method of Rec [17]; the hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenyl phosphate at alkaline pH to 4-nitrophenol and inorganic phosphate is catalysed by alkaline phosphatase and the intensity of the colour is directly proportional to the activity of ALP. Urea was investigated using the Urease-Berthelot colorimetric method of Fawcett and Scott [18]; urea in serum is hydrolysed to ammonia in the presence of urease. The ammonia formed is measured spectrophotometrically by the Berthelot reaction. Creatinine was measured by the picrate method [19]; creatinine reacts with picric acid in an alkaline medium to form a yellow-red colored complex which can be measured spectrophotometrically at 520 nm. Serum electrolytes [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] were measured using a flame emission spectrophotometer; [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] are atomised using a flame; the amount of atomisation is proportional to the quantity of the element in the solution, while HCO3 was estimated using a titrimetric method [20]. Packed cell volume (PCV) of samples was determined using microhematocrit centrifuge at 12000 g for 5min [21]; white blood cell (WBC) count and differentials were determined by mechanical expansion and optical magnification, augmented by supravital cell staining [21].

2.7. Histopathological Analysis. Three animals from each group were selected randomly and dissected through a central abdominal incision. The kidney, heart, and liver samples were collected and immediately fixed in 10% formal saline in labeled sample plastic bottles. The tissues were dehydrated in graded concentrations of xylene, embedded in molten paraffin wax, and sectioned at 5 [micro]. Tissue sections were fixed on glass slides and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for light microscopy at 400x [22]. Photomicrographs of some of the tissues were taken using a microscope fitted with a camera unit.

2.8. Statistical Analysis. Data were expressed as mean [+ or -] standard deviation for the given number of observations. The results were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test using GraphPad Instat Software. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Acute Toxicity Study. The [LD.sub.50] was found to be greater than 5000 mg/kg body weight. During the course of the toxicity experiment, the animals were observed for any change in behavioural pattern, physical characteristics, and activity. The rats in all the steps displayed no appreciable change in physical or behavioural activities; they fed well and moved about in their cages well. The histological preparations of the liver after treatment with the extract are presented in Figures 1(a) and 1(b); both the normal and experimental preparations appear

within the range of a preserved histological architecture.

3.2. Effect of Subchronic Oral Administration of Aqueous Stem Bark Extract of K. senegalensis on Ratio of Organ Weight: Body Weight of Rats and Percentage Change in Body Weight of the First Day and Last Day of the Experimental Period. The effects of oral administration of aqueous extract of Khaya senegalensis stem bark on the ratio of organ weight: body weight of experimental rats and percentage change in body weight of the first and last days of the experimental period are shown in Table 1. Prolonged administration of the extract for 28 days resulted in significant (P < 0.05)decrease in percentage change in body weight of the experimental rats in a dose dependent manner when compared to the values of the control group. Administration of several doses of the extract to their corresponding groups had no significant (P > 0.05) effect on the ratio of kidney weight: body weight as well as ratio of heart weight: body weight when compared to the values of their corresponding control group. How ever the ratios of liver weight: body weight and spleen weight: body weight were observed to be significantly different at the higher doses of 1600 mg/kg (P < 0.05) and 2000 mg/kg (P < 0.01) when compared to their corresponding control values.

3.3. Effect of Subchronic Oral Administration of Aqueous Stem Bark Extract of K. senegalensis on Kidney Function Parameters of Rats. The effect of aqueous stem bark extract of K. senegalensis on serum urea, creatinine, potassium ion, and sodium ion is shown in Table 2. The administration of the extract increased the serum concentration of urea and potassium ion significantly (P < 0.05) in all the different dose groups when compared to their corresponding control values. There was an observed corresponding increase in the values of creatinine and sodium levels in all the dose groups, with significant (P < 0.05) difference at the 1600 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg body weight dose group.

3.4. Effect of Subchronic Oral Administration of Aqueous Stem Bark Extract of K. senegalensis on Liver Function Parameters of Rats. The effect of subchronic oral administration of aqueous stem bark extract on serum total protein, albumin, globulin, albumin/globulin ratio (A:G), some transaminases activities, alkaline phosphatase activity, and bilirubin is presented in Table 3. The results indicated a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the values of total protein and albumin in a dose dependent manner. The observed significant (P < 0.05) effect on globulin and albumin/globulin ratio was however not dose dependent. The effect of the extract resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) increase in AST, ALT, and ALP activities when compared to their corresponding control values. Similarly, the extract exerted a significant (P < 0.05)decrease in total bilirubin, conjugated bilirubin, and un conjugated bilirubin when compared to their corresponding control values.

3.5. Effect of Subchronic Oral Administration of Aqueous Stem Bark Extract of K. senegalensis on Haematological Indices of Albino Rats. Results on the effect of sub-chronic oral administration of aqueous stem bark extract of K. senegalensis on haematological indices are presented in Table 4. The results demonstrate that the extract at the different experimental doses had no significant (P > 0.05) effect on the haematological indices.

3.6. Histopathology. The livers of animals in the control group (0 mg/kg) showed typical hepatolobular architecture, consisting of a central vein with radiating cords of hepatocytes separated by sinusoids; portal areas composed of the portal vein, hepatic artery, and bile duct were situated at the periphery. The hepatocytes were polygonal in shape, with central, lightly stained nucleus and clear nucleolus; few binucleated cells were also present, and the cytoplasm was regularly distributed without vacuolations. In the treated dose groups (400, 800,1200,1600, and 2000 mg/kg bw) the general hepatolobular architecture of the liver was deranged; there was loss of radial arrangement of hepatocytes and sinusoids; the number of binucleated cells was increased; inflammatory cells, especially lymphocytes, were found infiltrating around the portal track; areas of necrosis were found around the central vein.

Examination of the liver histological preparations obtained from all the experimental treated groups showed comparable changes as observed in Figures 2(a) to 2(f).

The histological preparations of the kidney and heart of the rats based on the subchronic toxicity study of aqueous stem bark extract of K. senegalensis indicated that they had normal architecture (Figures 3 and 4). The observed changes, however, in all the treated groups were restricted to only mild congestion and were not dose dependent.

4. Discussion

The [LD.sub.50] of aqueous stem bark extract of K. senegalensis was found to be greater than 5000 mg/kg; it may therefore be considered nontoxic; although this does not predict the lethal dose in humans, it however provides a guide for choosing the dose for use in sub-chronic studies.

Body weight is normally investigated as a sensitive indicator of chemically induced changes to organs. The comparison between the ratiometric differences of organ: body weight of the control group and the treated groups has been used to evaluate the toxic effect of the test substance [23]. The result of this study shows that sub-chronic administration of K. senegalensis does not affect the anatomical proportion (ratios of kidney: body weight and heart: body weight) as compared to normal control; this may be that the defensive mechanism of the animal has not been overcome and/or may be that the dose has not accumulated sufficiently to manifest any significant change. However, the significant increase of the ratio of liver:body weight (hepatomegaly) following the administration of the extract may be attributed to tissue oedema (oedematous) and ballooning resulting in necrosis; this may be due to the role of the liver in detoxification and excretion. The spleen at the dose group of 2000 mg/kg body weight was significantly (P < 0.05) increased (splenomegaly): this could result from any one of the following: hemolytic anemia, cirrhosis, hepatic vein obstruction, and portal vein obstruction. It could also have been a result of an induced alpha-mannosidosis by the extract, that is, if the extract was able to penetrate into the lysosome. It is therefore worthy to mention that the higher dose levels (1600 and 2000 mg/kg bodyweight)should be used with caution.

The possibility of renal insufficiency or dysfunction occurring as a result of the toxic effect of the extract may be eminent. The observed (Table 2)significant increase in serum sodium ions with a concomitant significant increase in potassium ion levels may be due to renal dysfunction resulting from the inability of the kidney to regulate an electrolyte

balance. The extract may also interact with specific hormone receptors resulting in increased production of aldosterone and mineralocorticoids which may be responsible for the observed hypernatraemia. Furthermore, the marked elevation in serum urea level in this study may suggest that the extract caused renal impairment in the rats or it may be a result of increased protein catabolism. However since urea is not a complete estimation of renal function, the observed significant increase in creatinine may further buttress the extract as toxic to the kidney at the doses used in this study.

Serums ALT and AST considered in this study are important and play significant role in the diagnosis of liver cytolysis [24]. The estimation of the levels of protein and bilirubin is used to examine the synthetic and excretory function of the liver, respectively. Measurement of the activities of enzymes in tissues and body fluids plays a significant and well known role in disease investigation and diagnosis [25]. Tissue enzyme assay can also indicate tissue cellular damage long before structural damage can be picked up by conventional histological techniques. Such measurement can also give an insight to the site of cellular tissue damage as a result of assault by the plant extract [26].

In this study, the resultant increase in the activities of serums ALT and AST may be an indication of liver cytolysis, through which they are released into circulation. ALT is located in the cytosol of hepatocytes and the enzyme is considered a more sensitive marker of hepatocellular damage than AST. AST is found in the cytoplasm and mitochondria in different tissues of the heart, liver, kidney, skeletal muscle, pancreas, and erythrocyte [27]. The amino transferases are significant in amino acid metabolism as they help in retaining amino groups during the degradation of amino acids which are further used for the synthesis of new amino acids, and hence they are involved in the biochemical regulation of the intracellular amino acid pool. Also, when these enzymes are mobilized from the liver into the free circulation, glutamate concentration may be affected with a resultant decrease in

glutathione, one-third of which is formed from glutamate [28]. Detoxification is the essential role of glutathione, and cells are exposed to an attack by the active metabolite when it is depleted. Also, a significant (P < 0.05) change in the level of total bilirubin was observed (Table 2). This may indicate that the functional integrity of the liver has been affected by the damage caused to the liver by the plant extract [29]. Bilirubin is assayed to measure the binding, excreting, and conjugating ability of a hepatocyte. Hence, the observed increase may indicate that a component of the plant extract, might have competed and displaced the binding of bilirubin on albumin or the uptake of bilirubin is inhibited by the plant extract; this may also account for the increased level of unconjugated bilirubin. All these would lead to an increase in total bilirubin in the serum. Extract administration produced a significant decrease in the total protein concentration in all the dose groups with the exception of 400 mg/kg body weight. Hence the aqueous stem bark extract might inhibit the synthesis of some proteins, thereby resulting in the decrease in serum total protein. It has been reported that low protein level results when there is extensive liver damage [30]. The result of this study revealed significant (P < 0.05) increase in the activity of serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP). ALP is often employed to assess the integrity of the plasma membrane of the liver [31]. The significant increase in the serum ALP following administration of the plant extracts maybe due to disruption of the liver plasma membrane. The result of this study therefore demonstrates that K. senegalensis at the experimental doses is nephrotoxic and should be used with caution when administered over a long period of time.

The possibility of the extract giving rise to haemopoietic damage, malignancy, allergy, or compromise to the immune status could be ruled out since all haematological parameters assayed did not show any significant changes when compared with their corresponding controls.

The liver being an organ of detoxification is the first organ that encounters all absorbed materials from the gastrointestinal tract: it has been shown to respond to toxicological insults in a number of ways including cellular degeneration and necrosis and bile duct hyperplasia and fibrosis [32]. These findings are consistent with those of Garba et al. [33]and Mutalik et al. [34]; its protective property by detoxification may explain the preserved architecture of the kidney and heart. The mild to moderate congestion as well as hemorrhage observed on the histological slides could be attributed to surgical handling of the organs since these conditions were also observed in the normal groups.

5. Conclusion

These observations suggest that long term administration of K. senegalensis may be toxic and its toxicity may be organ specific.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.


The second author wishes to thank the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) for the grant used for this research.


[1] R. W. J. Keay, C. F. F. Onochie, and J. Stanfield, A Revised Version of Trees of Nigeria, Clarendon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989.

[2] L. S. Gill, Ethnomedical Uses of Plants in Nigeria, University of Benin Press, Benin, Nigeria, 1992.

[3] M. Iwu, Hankbook of African Medicinal Plants, Pharmacognostical Profile of Selected Medicinal Plants, CRC Press Inc, 1993.

[4] M. Lompo, J. B. Nikiema, I. P. Guissou, A. J. Moes, and J. Fontaine, "The topical anti-inflammatory effect of chloroform extracts from Khaya senegalensis stembarks," Phytotherapy Research, vol. 12, pp. 448-450, 1998.

[5] W. M. Kone, K. Kamanzi Atindehou, C. Terreaux, K. Hostettmann, D. Traore, and M. Dosso, "Traditional medicine in North Cote-d'Ivoire: screening of 50 medicinal plants for antibacterial activity," Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 43-49, 2004.

[6] I. O. Ademola, B. O. Fagbemi, and S. O. Idowu, "Evaluation of the anthelmintic activity of Khaya senegalensis extract against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep: in vitro and in vivo studies," Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 151-164, 2004.

[7] X. M. Androulakis, S. J. Muga, F. Chen, Y. Koita, B. Toure, and M. J. Wargovich, "Chemopreventive effects of Khaya senegalensis bark extract on human colorectal cancer," Anticancer Research, vol. 26, no. 3 B, pp. 2397-2405, 2006.

[8] A. El-Tahir, A. M. Ibrahim, G. M. H. Satti, T. G. Theander, A. Kharazmi, and S. A. Khalid, "The Potential Antileishmanial activity of some Sudanese medicinal plants," Phytotherapy Research, vol. 12, pp. 576-579, 1998.

[9] G. A. Adesida, E. K. Adesogan, D. A. Okorie, D. A. H. Taylor, and B. T. Styles, "The limonoid chemistry of the genus Khaya (meliaceae)," Phytochemistry, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1845-1853, 1971.

[10] D. A. Mulholland, B. Parel, and P. H. Coombes, "The chemistry of the Meliaceae and Ptaeroxylaceae of Southern and Eastern Africa and Madagascar," Current Organic Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1011-1054, 2000.

[11] T. Narender, T. Khaliq, K. P. Shweta-Reddy, and R. K. Sharma, "Occurrences, Biosynthesis, Activity and NMR spectroscopy of Dand B, Dringseco-limonoidsofMeliaceae family," Natural Product Communications, vol. 2, pp. 203-221, 2007.

[12] J. B. Harborne, Phytochemical Methods, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1973.

[13] OECD, "Acute Oral Toxicity-up and down procedure," Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, vol.425, pp.1-26, 2004.

[14] B. T. Doumas, Quoted in Cheesbrough M., 1992, vol. 1 of Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries, ELBS, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 1975.

[15] K. Spencer and C. P. Price, "Guidelines on standard operating procedures for clinical chemistry," Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 14, pp. 105-115, 1977.

[16] S. Reitman and S. Frankel, "A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases," American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol.28, no. 1, pp. 56-63, 1957.

[17] G. K. C. Deutsche, "Optimised standard colorimetric methods. (Serum Alkaline Phosphatase)," Journal of Clinical Chemistry & Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 10, article 182, 1972.

[18] J. K. Fawcett and J. E. Scott, "A rapid and precise method for the determination of urea," Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 13, pp. 156-159, 1960.

[19] B. Seaton and A. Ali, "Serum creatinine level," Medical Laboratory Scientist, vol. 41, pp. 327-336, 1984.

[20] M. Cheesbrough, Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries, vol. 1, EESB, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 1992.

[21] J. V. Dander and S. M. Lewis, Practical Hematology, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Scotland, 7th edition, 1991.

[22] J. A. Kiernan, Histological and Histochemical Methods: Theory and Practice, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1981.

[23] J. M. Peters and E. M. Boyd, "Organ weights and water levels of the rat following reduced food intake," Journal of Nutrition, vol. 90, no 4, pp 354-360, 1966

[24] M. Shahjahan, K. E. Sabitha, M. Jainu, and C. S. Shyamala Devi, "Effect of Solanum trilobatum against carbon tetrachloride induced hepatic damage in albino rats," Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol.120, no.3, pp.194-198, 2004.

[25] S. O. Malomo, "Toxicological implications of ceftriaxone administration in rats," Nigerian Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol.15, pp.33-38, 2000.

[26] J. O. Adebayo, M. T. Yakubu, E. C. Egwim, V B. Owoyele, and B. U. Enaibe, "Effect of ethanolic extract of Khaya senegalensis on some biochemical parameters of rat kidney," Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 69-72, 2003.

[27] S. W. Hassan, A. A. Umar, A. A. Ebbo, A. J. Akpeji, and I. K. Matazu, "Hepatoprotective effect of leaf extracts of Parkinsonia aculeate L. Against CCL intoxication in albino rats," International Journal of Biochemistry, vol.2, no.2, pp.42-48, 2008.

[28] L. Stryer, Principles of Biochemistry, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 1995.

[29] H. A. Edmonson and R. L. Peters, "Liver," in Andersen's Pathology, J. M. Kissane, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 1096-1212, Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 8th edition, 1985.

[30] H. Wada and E. E. Snell, "Enzymatic transamination of pyridoxamine. II. Crystalline pyridoxamine-pyruvate transaminase," The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 237, pp. 133-137, 1962.

[31] M. A. Akanji, "Effect of chronic consumption of metabisulphite on the integrity of the rat kidney cellular system," Toxicology, vol.81, no.3, pp.173-179, 1993.

[32] Y. Saidu, L. S. Bilbis, M. Lawal, S. A. Isezuo, and R. A. Umar, "Hematotoxicity study of the Leaf Extract of Albiziachevalieri," Biochemia Medica, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 139-270, 2007.

[33] S. H. Garba, S. Ahmadu, and I. A. John, "The effect of aqueous stem bark extract of Sclerocarya birrea (Hoechst) on alcohol carbon tetrachloride induced liver damage in rats," Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol.9, no.12, pp. 2283-2287,2006.

[34] S. Mutalik, M. Chetana, B. Sulochana, P. U. Devi, and N. Udupa, "Effect of Dianex, a herbal formulation on experimentally induced diabetes mellitus," Phytotherapy Research, vol.19, no.5, pp.409-415, 2005.

A. Onu, (1) Y. Saidu, (1) M. J. Ladan, (1) L. S. Bilbis, (1) A. A. Aliero, (2) and S. M. Sahabi (3)

(1) Department of Biochemistry, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, PMB. 2346, Sokoto, Nigeria

(2) Department of Biological Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, PMB. 2346, Sokoto, Nigeria

(3) Department of Histopathology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, PMB. 2346, Sokoto, Nigeria

Correspondence should be addressed to A. Onu;

Received 12 July 2013; Accepted 19 September 2013

Academic Editor: Abdelwahab Omri

TABLE 1: Effect of subchronic oral administration of aqueous stem
bark extract of K. senegalensis on ratio of organ weight: body
weight of rats and percentage change in body weight of the first
day and last day of the experimental period.

mg/kg bw    Kidney : body weight         Liver : body weight

0          0.0053 [+ or -] 0.0001      0.0348 [+ or -] 0.0017
400        0.0057 [+ or -] 0.0003      0.0365 [+ or -] 0.0016
800        0.0051 [+ or -] 0.0002      0.0365 [+ or -] 0.0013
1200       0.0052 [+ or -] 0.0003      0.0366 [+ or -] 0.0016
1600       0.0057 [+ or -] 0.0003      0.0383 [+ or -] 00.0012 (b)
2000       0.0055 [+ or -] 0.0004      0.0398 [+ or -] 0.0017 (b)

mg/kg bw     Heart: bodyweight         Spleen : body weight

0          0.0028 [+ or -] 0.0005     0.0026 [+ or -] 0.0001
400        0.0029 [+ or -] 0.0008     0.0028 [+ or -] 0.0004
800        0.0030 [+ or -] 0.0006     0.0030 [+ or -] 0.0003
1200       0.0030 [+ or -] 0.0006     0.0033 [+ or -] 0.0005
1600       0.0031 [+ or -] 0.0004     0.0034 [+ or -] 0.0005
2000       0.0031 [+ or -] 0.0005     0.0043 [+ or -] 0.0001 (b)

mg/kg bw   Change in body weight (%)

0           62.64 [+ or -] 8.5
400         47.11 [+ or -] 4.8 (b)
800         43.39 [+ or -] 13.1 (b)
1200        41.84 [+ or -] 3.4 (b)
1600        37.45 [+ or -] 4.8 (b)
2000        35.32 [+ or -] 9.9 (b)

Values are expressed as mean [+ or -] SD; n=5. The level of
significance was set at (b) P < 0.05 when compared with control
at 0 mg/kg body weight, Dunnett's multiple comparison test.

TABLE 2: Effect of subchronic oral administration of aqueous
stem bark extracts of K. senegalensis on kidney function
parameters of rats.

mg/kg bw          Urea (mmol/L)               Creatinine

0            3.83 [+ or -] 0.38         14.47 [+ or -] 1.74
400          4.87 [+ or -] 0.69 (b)     13.45 [+ or -] 3.02
800          4.92 [+ or -] 0.29 (b)     22.74 [+ or -] 3.46
1200         4.89 [+ or -] 0.37 (b)     29.11 [+ or -] 3.10
1600         5.07 [+ or -] 0.16 (b)     49.44 [+ or -] 9.42 (b)
2000         5.02 [+ or -] 0.20 (b)     70.46 [+ or -] 10.99 (b)

mg/kg bw       [Na.sup.+] (mmol/L)        [K.sup.+] (mmol/L)

0              134.3 [+ or -] 1.48      4.38 [+ or -] 0.08
400            135.5 [+ or -] 1.96      4.48 [+ or -] 0.08 (b)
800            136.9 [+ or -] 1.86      5.16 [+ or -] 0.24 (b)
1200           136.8 [+ or -] 2.38      5.48 [+ or -] 0.30 (b)
1600           140.8 [+ or -] 4.55 (b)  5.58 [+ or -] 0.41 (b)
2000           142.8 [+ or -] 4.10 (b)  6.21 [+ or -] 0.24 (b)

Values are expressed as mean [+ or -] SD; n = 5. The level of
significance was set at P < 0.05 when compared with control at
0 mg/kg body weight, Dunnett's multiple comparison test.

TABLE 3: Effect of subchronic oral administration of aqueous
stem bark extract of K. senegalensis on liver function
parameters of Albino rats.

Test                      0 mg/kg bw             400 mg/kgbw

T. protein (g/dL)     9.56 [+ or -] 0.64     9.09 [+ or -] 0.22
Albumin (g/dL)        5.31 [+ or -] 0.44     4.08 [+ or -] 0.21 (b)
Globulin (g/dL)       4.16 [+ or -] 0.23     4.85 [+ or -] 0.24 (b)
A:G ratio             1.32 [+ or -] 0.22     0.89 [+ or -] 0.10 (b)
AST(U/I)             52.44 [+ or -] 2.50    54.15 [+ or -] 2.87
ALT (U/I)            32.54 [+ or -] 2.50    37.58 [+ or -] 3.26
ALP (U/I)           124.74 [+ or -] 8.72   126.41 [+ or -] 12.56
T. BIL (mg/dL)        1.17 [+ or -] 0.61     1.92 [+ or -] 0.89
C. BIL (mg/dL)        0.91 [+ or -] 0.36     0.37 [+ or -] 0.21 (b)
U. BIL (mg/dL)        0.26 [+ or -] 0.25     1.46 [+ or -] 0.36 (b)

Test                       800 mg/kg bw

T. protein (g/dL)      8.30 [+ or -] 0.35 (b)
Albumin (g/dL)         4.05 [+ or -] 0.21 (b)
Globulin (g/dL)        4.25 [+ or -] 0.22
A:G ratio              0.96 [+ or -] 0.14 (b)
AST(U/I)              59.60 [+ or -] 2.60 (b)
ALT (U/I)             44.17 [+ or -] 3.10 (b)
ALP (U/I)            135.42 [+ or -] 12.25 (b)
T. BIL (mg/dL)         2.13 [+ or -] 0.71 (b)
C. BIL (mg/dL)         0.76 [+ or -] 0.29 (b)
U. BIL (mg/dL)         1.36 [+ or -] 0.32 (b)

Test                       1200 mg/kgbw

T. protein (g/dL)      8.04 [+ or -] 0.22 (b)
Albumin (g/dL)         3.99 [+ or -] 0.33 (b)
Globulin (g/dL)        4.08 [+ or -] 0.17
A:G ratio              0.98 [+ or -] 0.10 (b)
AST(U/I)              58.07 [+ or -] 3.35 (b)
ALT (U/I)             51.53 [+ or -] 3.00 (b)
ALP (U/I)            149.43 [+ or -] 6.80 (b)
T. BIL (mg/dL)         1.72 [+ or -] 0.91 (b)
C. BIL (mg/dL)         0.42 [+ or -] 0.17 (b)
U. BIL (mg/dL)         1.29 [+ or -] 0.43 (b)

Test                       1600 mg/kgbw

T. protein (g/dL)      7.98 [+ or -] 0.18 (b)
Albumin (g/dL)         4.24 [+ or -] 0.22 (b)
Globulin (g/dL)        3.70 [+ or -] 0.21 (b)
A:G ratio              1.12 [+ or -] 0.12
AST(U/I)              61.24 [+ or -] 3.61 (b)
ALT (U/I)             53.22 [+ or -] 2.83 (b)
ALP (U/I)            198.40 [+ or -] 2.60 (b)
T. BIL (mg/dL)         3.96 [+ or -] 0.60 (b)
C. BIL (mg/dL)         1.40 [+ or -] 0.29 (b)
U. BIL (mg/dL)         2.45 [+ or -] 0.47 (b)

Test                       2000 mg/kgbw

T. protein (g/dL)      7.59 [+ or -] 0.36 (b)
Albumin (g/dL)         4.35 [+ or -] 0.30 (b)
Globulin (g/dL)        3.09 [+ or -] 0.29 (b)
A:G ratio              1.49 [+ or -] 0.16
AST(U/I)              84.06 [+ or -] 3.63 (b)
ALT (U/I)             60.18 [+ or -] 3.40 (b)
ALP (U/I)            287.93 [+ or -] 51.80 (b)
T. BIL (mg/dL)         4.26 [+ or -] 0.49 (b)
C. BIL (mg/dL)         1.47 [+ or -] 0.27 (b)
U. BIL (mg/dL)         2.88 [+ or -] 0.56 (b)

Values are expressed as mean [+ or -] SD; n = 5. The level of
significance was set at P < 0.05 when compared with control at
0 mg/kg body weight, Dunnett's multiple comparison test.

TABLE 4: Effect of subchronic administration of aqueous stem bark
extract of K. senegalensis on haematological indices of Albino rats.

Dose mg/kg
body weight          PCV (%)           WBC (x[10.sup.9] L)

0              41.67 [+ or -] 2.50    3.80 [+ or -] 0.76
400             42.2 [+ or -] 6.08    1.04 [+ or -] 3.00
800            30.00 [+ or -] 5.40    2.50 [+ or -] 0.58
1200           39.50 [+ or -] 6.36    4.00 [+ or -] 2.12
1600           34.33 [+ or -] 12.66   1.32 [+ or -] 3.00
2000           41.67 [+ or -] 1.53    2.83 [+ or -] 3.00
Dose mg/kg
body weight      Neutrophils (%)         Lymphocytes (%)

0             47.67 [+ or -] 2.52    47.67 [+ or -] 3.06
400           46.33 [+ or -] 6.03    49.67 [+ or -] 6.51
800           44.50 [+ or -] 6.46    51.75 [+ or -] 2.36
1200           45.5 [+ or -] 7.78    49.50 [+ or -] 6.36
1600          48.00 [+ or -] 3.61    49.00 [+ or -] 3.61
2000          52.00 [+ or -] 6.08    44.00 [+ or -] 5.29

Dose mg/kg
body weight     Eosinophils (%)         Monocytes (%)

0             3.33 [+ or -] 2.52    2.33 [+ or -] 1.53
400           3.00 [+ or -] 1.00    1.33 [+ or -] 0.58
800           2.50 [+ or -] 3.00    1.75 [+ or -] 0.96
1200          4.50 [+ or -] 2.12    1.50 [+ or -] 0.71
1600          2.67 [+ or -] 1.53    1.67 [+ or -] 1.16
2000          3.33 [+ or -] 1.50    1.33 [+ or -] 0.58

Dose mg/kg
body weight   Platelets (x[10.sup.9] L)

0              106.67 [+ or -] 5.77
400            110.00 [+ or -] 10.00
800            115.00 [+ or -] 19.15
1200           130.00 [+ or -] 28.28
1600           130.00 [+ or -] 20.00
2000           110.00 [+ or -] 10.00

Values are expressed as mean [+ or -] SD; n=5. The level of
significance was set at P < 0.01 when compared with control at
0 mg/kg body weight, Dunnett's multiple comparison test.

PCV: packed cell volume; WBC: white blood cell.
COPYRIGHT 2013 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Onu, A.; Saidu, Y.; Ladan, M.J.; Bilbis, L.S.; Aliero, A.A.; Sahabi, S.M.
Publication:Journal of Toxicology
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:6NIGR
Date:Jan 1, 2013
Previous Article:Toxicologic assessment of a commercial decolorized whole leaf aloe vera juice, lily of the desert filtered whole leaf juice with aloesorb.
Next Article:Expression of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase and level of free radical processes under toxic hepatitis in rats.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |