Effect of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on flower-visiting behavior of insects on Brassica napus (Brassicales: Brassicaceae).
Rapeseed Brassica napus L. (Brassicales: Brassicaceae) is a common cross-pollinated plant and an insect-pollinated (entomophilous) crop, and its nectar attracts flower-visiting insect pollinators. Our previous study found that fire ants frequently foraged B. napus flowers, possibly producing negative effects on flower-visiting insects, including the Chinese honey bee Apis cerana F. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the cabbage white butterfly Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). These flower-visiting insects usually play an important role in the reproduction of plants (Hickman 1974; Gomez et al. 1996; Raju & Ezradanam 2002; de Vega et al. 2009; Luo et al. 2011, 2012). Furthermore, fire ant workers foraged more frequently on plants when aphids were present, potentially leading to an increased problem for the pollinators. Chemicals, including hydrocarbons, esters, and fatty acids, mediate the recognition and communication between insects (Howard 1993; Kaib et al. 2004; Dani et al. 2005). We hypothesized that fire ants may cause interference on the flower-visiting behavior of insects via their volatiles, which have been well researched in other studies (Oliveira 1997; Blancafort & Gomez 2005; Ballantyne 2011).
To test this hypothesis, we conducted a series of field experiments to examine how S. invicta and its interaction with aphids affected the flower-visiting behavior of insects on B. napus. We also identified chemicals from fire ants and analyzed their electrophysiological effect on P. rapae by gas chromatography-electroantennogram detection (GC-EAD) bioassays. The results of these experiments may provide insights to evaluate the impact that S. invicta has on crops and the mechanisms involved.
Materials and Methods
Brassica napus seeds (Nanwu kemao Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were purchased from a farm market. For field bioassays, cotton aphids Aphis gossypii Glover and corn leaf aphids Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) (Aphidomorpha: Aphididae) were collected from Chinese hibiscus Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. (Malvales: Malvaceae) and maize Zea mays L. (Poales: Poaceae), respectively. Green peach aphids Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and mustard aphids Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) (Aphidomorpha: Aphididae) were collected from B. napus in the experimental fields of South China Agricultural University (23.235814[degrees]N, 113.655616[degrees]E). These aphids were reared on B. napus in the laboratory, where the temperature was maintained at 27 [+ or -] 2 [degrees]C with a relative humidity of 60 to 70%, and used in the field experiments 24 h later.
For laboratory bioassays, cabbage white butterfly P rapae and Chinese honey bee A. cerana adults were collected from Bidens bipinnata L. (Asterales: Asteraceae) on the campus of South China Agricultural University. These butterflies and honeybees were maintained in cages for 1 to 2 h until bioassays could be performed.
Experiment I: Effects of S. invicta on the Flower-Visiting Behavior of Insects on B. napus
This investigation was conducted in the experimental fields of South China Agricultural University from Sep to Nov 2013. Fifteen plots were prepared for growing B. napus. The area of each plot was approximately 6 [m.sup.2] (2 x 3 m). The plots were separated by 1 m wide ditches that contained water to prevent ant migration.
Our experiments were conducted as follows: (1) 5 plots were supplied with colonies of S. invicta; (2) 5 plots were supplied with colonies of S. invicta and aphids; (3) 5 plots without fire ant (confirmed by baiting) and aphid infestations were chosen to exclude colonies of S. invicta and aphids. When necessary, imidacloprid (Daguangming Agrochemical Co., Ltd., Jiangmeng, China) was used to eliminate aphids on B. napus. In each treatment, we cultivated 70 to 100 B. napus plants in each plot. Sizable colonies of S. invicta were inoculated on the appointed plots when B. napus began to bloom. Specifically, 50 g (approx. 50,000 individuals) of colony, which included workers, brood, and 5 queens, was introduced. We then verified whether the transferred colonies had survived by placing sausage baits, and a 2nd colony of S. invicta was provided if the 1st colony had not successfully established. Seven days after fire ant colonization, 600 to 800 aphids for each of 5 plots were transferred onto the plants via small plastic tubes with cotton plugs prior to their introduction to the study site.
Before the field investigation, we determined the flower-visiting insects by net sweeping and microscopic observation. The main insects that visited B. napus were as follows: P rapae; A. cerana; striped flea beetle Phyllotreta striolata (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae); flower thrips Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae); and the hover flies Eristalinus quinquestriatus and E. quinquelineatus (Diptera: Syrphidae). Pieris rapae and A. cerana were considered as effective pollinators of B. napus flowers by pollen inspection (Free 1993).
From 22 Oct to 8 Nov, we measured the following variables during the day. (1) Ten flowers were collected from each plot to count the number of P striolata, and a 10 min observation of each plot was conducted to determine the number of other insects. (2) Visiting frequency, that is, the number of flowers visited by a pollinating insect, was observed for 1 min. To obtain this measurement, the time when an insect pollinator started to visit the first flower until it left the plot was recorded, and the number of flowers it visited and the duration for each visit were then calculated (Arroyo et al. 1985; Marten-Rodriguez & Fenster 2008). Observations of P rapae and A. cerana were replicated 30-40 and 65 times, respectively, for each plot. (3) We measured visiting duration for each flower to establish the length of time a pollinating insect visited each flower (Arroyo et al. 1985; Marten-Rodriguez & Fenster 2008). We recorded the time when an insect pollinator first visited a flower until it left the flower. Observations of P rapae and A. cerana were replicated 30-40 and 90 times, respectively, for each plot.
Experiment II: Electroantennogram Reaction of P rapae to the Volatiles of S. invicta
Extraction of Volatiles of Fire Ant Workers by Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME). All of the analyses were performed following the SPME procedure described below. A fiber was exposed to the headspace vapor of a 20 mL vial containing 2 g of living fire ant workers for 30 min. SPME experiments were carried out using a 100 [micro]m polydimethylsiloxane fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, USA). The fiber was conditioned in the injection port of the gas chromatograph at 300 [degrees]C under helium flow for 1 h before use. Desorption was carried out in a splitless mode at a temperature of 310 [degrees]C for 3 min. A fiber blank was run between each sample to reduce memory effects.
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analyses. The volatiles of S. invicta workers were analyzed by GC-MS (Shimadzu QP2010 Plus, Kyoto, Japan). Volatiles were separated in an Agilent DB5 capillary column (5% phenyl-methylpolysilicone; 30 m x 0.25 mm ID x 0.25 pm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California) using helium (99.99%) as carrier gas at a 1.0 mL/min flow rate. The oven temperature was held at 150 [degrees]C for 1 min and increased by 10 [degrees]C/min until 280 [degrees]C, where it was held for 10 min.
GC-EAD Analyses. The antennae of P.[R][R] rapae adults were exposed to volatiles and subsequently subjected to GC-EAD analyses to detect biologically active peaks (components). The GC-EAD techniques used were similar to those described in previous studies (Ngumbi et al. 2009). The system consisted of an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and coupled to an EAG detector. The dimension of the GC capillary column was the same as described above. The column effluent was mixed with 30 mL/ min helium and split at a ratio of 1:2 (v/v), with 1 part going to the FID and the other through a heated (280 [degrees]C) transfer line (Syntech[R], Hilversum, the Netherlands) into a charcoal-filtered and humidified airstream (500 mL/min) directed at the antenna preparation (EAG detector). The GC oven was programmed as above. The antenna preparation and EAG techniques were the same as previously described (Andersson & Dobson 2003). The antenna for the GC-EAD was removed from the male butterfly, and the base was connected to the grounding electrode while the tip, which was cut (approx. 2 mm removed) to obtain better contact, was connected to the recording electrode. The identification of each volatile compound was made by GC-MS (see above), and the approximate amount of each compound was calculated from the GCMS analyses. The analog signal was detected through a probe (INR-II, Syntech[R]), captured and processed with a data acquisition controller (IDAC-4, Syntech[R]), and later analyzed with computer software (GcEad 32, Syntech[R]). Five successful GC-EAD recordings were obtained for each treatment. GC-EAD traces were overlaid on the computer monitor and inspected for significant and consistent qualitative and quantitative differences among treatments (Ngumbi et al. 2009).
Electroantennographic Recording. The olfactory sensitivity of male butterflies to 3 chemical standards, namely, tricosane, pentacosane, and heptacosane from Dr. Ehrenstorfe (Augsburg, Germany), was tested. EAG (Syntech[R]) recordings were conducted with the recording electrode. The antenna preparation and EAG techniques were the same as above. The recordings were taken by pulsing air (1,000 ms) containing the identified cue diluted in hexane to produce a concentration of 0.01 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL over the antenna.
EAG Response of P. rapae to Volatile Compounds. Ten microliters per concentration of each compound was deposited onto a filter paper strip (5 x 20 mm), which was then inserted into a glass tube (6 x 95 mm). Each sample was examined 3 times for each antenna. Five males were used for the EAG recording of each sample, and the average response was calculated.
Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the species richness of flower-visiting insects on the B. napus plants among treatments and investigation dates. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare the number of flower-visiting insects on the B. napus plants, the visiting frequency and duration, and the EAG relative values (EAG response value to chemical standards/EAG response value to hexane) of butterflies and honeybees. ANOVA were followed by Tukey's post hoc test for multiple comparisons. All statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS version 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).
EFFECT OF S. INVICTA ON THE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND THE NUMBER OF FLOWER-VISITING INSECTS ON B. NAPUS
Field trials showed that the survey date (F = 7.116, df = 6, P < 0.001) had a significant effect on the species richness of the flower-visiting insects, whereas no significant difference was found among the treatments (F = 1.67, df = 2, P = 0.229) (Fig. 1A). Survey date and treatment (survey date: F = 37.718, df = 6, P < 0.001; treatment: F = 9.054, df = 2, P = 0.004) had significant effects on the total number of observed flower-visiting insects. The number of flower-visiting insects that appeared in the control plots was significantly higher than that in the plots of the 2 treatments, which contained fire ants or fire ants and aphids together (Fig. 1B).
The number of flea beetles in the plots with fire ants present was 43.5% lower than the number of flea beetles present in the control, but no difference was apparent between the 2 treatments (F = 7.539, df = 2, P = 0.008) (Fig. 2). The interaction between fire ants and aphids significantly decreased the number of the 2 hover fly species E. quinquestriatus and E. quinquelineatus (39.4% lower than in control; F = 4.202, df = 2, P = 0.041), whereas no significant differences were found for P rapae (F = 2.716, df = 2, P = 0.106), A. cerana (F = 2.306, df = 2, P = 0.142), and F intonsa (F = 0.216, df = 2, P = 0.809).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
EFFECT OF S. INVICTA ON THE VISITING FREQUENCY AND DURATION OF P. RAPAE AND A. CERANA
Solenopsis invicta had no significant effect on the visiting frequency of P rapae (F = 0.163, df = 2, P = 0.852) and A. cerana (F = 3.305, df = 2, P = 0.072) (Fig. 3). Cumulative probability through the investigation course varied similarly among the treatments for both P rapae and A. cerana (Fig. 3). The visiting duration at a single flower for P rapae in the plots that had fire ants and aphids excluded was significantly longer (1.42 and 1.29 fold) than in the plots of the 2 treatment (F = 10.83, df = 2, P = 0.002), whereas no significant difference was found for A. cerana (F = 1.684, df = 2, P = 0.227) (Table 1).
COMPOSITION OF THE VOLATILES OF S. INVICTA WORKERS AND THEIR ELECTROANTENNOGRAPHIC ACTIVITIES IN P. RAPAE
Five chemicals elicited an electroantennographic response in P. rapae adult males (Fig. 4). The 1st and 4th chemicals indicate n-alkanes, which had no electrophysiological effects on P rapae males. One unknown chemical (No. 3) could not be identified because of low concentration.
EAG RESPONSE OF P. RAPAE TO VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
Three chemical standards were available for the electroantennographic detection. At 0.01 mg/mL, the EAD relative value of P. rapae to heptacosane was significantly higher than to tricosane and penta cosane (F = 4.362, df = 2, P = 0.023), whereas no significant difference between the compounds was found at 1 mg/mL (F = 3.084, df = 2, P = 0.062) (Table 2).
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Insects are known to use a variety of sensory modalities in foraging, and visual, olfactory, and gustatory cues are usually involved in their orientation to and finding of food sources (Barth et al. 1985; Willmer & Stone 1997; Kats & Dill 1998; Dicke & Grostal 2001; Tsuji et al. 2004; Gonzalvez & Rodriguez-Girones 2013; Gonzalvez et al. 2013). In butterfly species, attraction to flowers is modulated by olfaction of floral scents (Honda et al. 1998; Andersson 2003; Tasin et al. 2010), and ant visitation to plants has been shown to hinder pollinators (Blancafort & Gomez 2005).
In the field investigation, we found that fire ant workers usually foraged on the stems near the ground but climbed higher and foraged more frequently on upper stems and flowers when aphids were present. Fire ants foraging on plants did not significantly reduce the number of A. cerana and P rapae, but they did reduce the number of 2 hover fly species, E. quinquestriatus and E. quinquelineatus, in addition to P striolata, which is an important pest of B. napus (Yan et al. 2013). This result indicates that fire ants may reduce the infestation by P striolata as well as the pollination activity of P. striolata. Visiting frequency and duration of visits of A. cerana showed no difference among the control and treatment plots, suggesting that fire ants did not affect their pollination efficiency on the B. napus plants. The fire ants did not affect the visiting frequency of P. rapae, one of the insect visitors on B. napus; however, the visiting duration at a single flower for P. rapae in the plots that had fire ants and aphids excluded was significantly longer than in the fire ant-included (1.42 fold) and fire-ant-and-aphid-included plots (1.29 fold). A decrease in the visiting duration of this butterfly may result in reduced pollination and further reduced fruit set (Thomson & Goodell 2001).
It was reported that a reduction in the diversity and abundance of insects in Protea nitida Mill. (Proteales: Proteaceae) inflorescences infested by Linepithema humile (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) could retard pollination and thus the reproductive capacity of the plants (Visser et al. 1996). In our experiments, P. rapae adults reduced their stay on the plants, possibly owing to the aggressive behavior of fire ants, which prey on other arthropods. Although our laboratory bioassays showed fire ant odors could induce the EAG response in P. rapae males, this finding only indicates that the test material was sensed by the olfactory system. It is to be stressed that EAG data should be interpreted carefully and more bioassays are needed to elucidate the behavioral significance of bioactive compounds.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
Our results indicate that fire ants may have affected the behavior of several of the potential pollinators, but probably had little effect on successful pollination of the crop because of the low impact on the behavior and abundance of A. cerana. More data are needed to evaluate the threat posed by fire ants to plant and pollinator conservation in the invaded crop fields. Moreover, the extent of the impact that fire ants have on crop production in agricultural systems in southern China needs further study.
This study was supported by the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Guangdong Province (No. 2012KJCX0022). We thank Hongwei Chen (SCAU), Wangqi Xue (SYNU), Liyun Jiang (CAS), Xinhua Wang (NKU), Keke Huo (SXTU), and Guangchun Liu (SYU) for identification of the aphids and flower-visiting insects.
Andersson S. 2003. Foraging responses in the butterflies Inachis io, Aglais urticae (Nymphalidae), and Gonepteryx rhamni (Pieridae) to floral scents. Chemoecology 13: 1-11.
Andersson S, Dobson HE. 2003. Antennal responses to floral scents in the butterfly Heliconius melpomene. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 2319-2330.
Arroyo MTK, Armesto JJ, Primack RB. 1985. Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile II. Effect of temperature on visitation rates and pollination possibilities. Plant Systematics and Evolution 149: 187-203.
Ballantyne G. 2011. Ants as flower visitors: floral ant-repellence and the impact of ant scent-marks on pollinator behaviour. Ph. D. thesis, University of St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Barth FG. 1985. Insects and Flowers: The Biology of a Partnership. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Blancafort X, Gomez C. 2005. Consequences of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), invasion on pollination of Euphorbia characias (L.) (Euphorbiaceae). Acta Oecologica 28: 49-55.
Bluthgen N, Verhaagh M, Goitia W, Jaffe K, Morawetz W, Barthlott W. 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125: 229-240.
Buckley R. 1987. Interactions involving plants, Homoptera, and ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 111-135.
Dani FR, Jones GR, Corsi S, Beard R, Pradella D, Turillazzi S. 2005. Nestmate recognition cues in the honey bee: differential importance of cuticular alkanes and alkenes. Chemical Senses 30: 477-489.
de Vega C, Arista M, Ortiz PL, Herrera CM, Talavera S. 2009. The ant-pollination system of Cytinus hypocistis (Cytinaceae), a Mediterranean root holoparasite. Annals of Botany 103: 1065-1075.
Dicke M, Grostal P. 2001. Chemical detection of natural enemies by arthropods: an ecological perspective. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 1-23.
Eubanks MD. 2001. Estimates of the direct and indirect effects of red imported fire ants on biological control in field crops. Biological Control 21: 35-43.
Free JB. 1993. Insect Pollination of Crops, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
Gomez JM, Zamora R, Hodar JA, Garda D. 1996. Experimental study of pollination by ants in Mediterranean high mountain and arid habitats. Oecologia 105: 236-242.
Gonzalvez FG, Rodriguez-Girones MA. 2013. Seeing is believing: information content and behavioural response to visual and chemical cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 280: 20130886.
Gonzalvez FG, Santamaria L, Corlett RT, Rodriguez-Girones MA. 2013. Flowers attract weaver ants that deter less effective pollinators. Journal of Ecology 101: 78-85.
Hickman JC. 1974. Pollination by ants: a low-energy system. Science 184: 1290-1292.
Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ. 2002. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 181-233.
Honda K, Omura H, Hayashi N. 1998. Identification of floral volatiles from Ligustrum japonicum that stimulate flower-visiting by cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24: 2167-2180.
Howard RW. 1993. Cuticular hydrocarbons and chemical communication, pp. 179-226, In Stanley DW, Nelson DR [eds.], Insect Lipids: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biology. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Kaib M, Jmhasly P, Wilfert L, Durka W, Franke S, Francke W, Leuthold RH, Brandl R. 2004. Cuticular hydrocarbons and aggression in the termite Macrotermes subhyalinus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 365-385.
Kaplan I, Eubanks MD. 2002. Disruption of cotton aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae)-Natural enemy dynamics by red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environmental Entomology 31: 1175-1183.
Kaplan I, Eubanks MD. 2005. Aphids alter the community-wide impact of fire ants. Ecology 86: 1640-1649.
Kats LB, Dill LM. 1998. The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5: 361-394.
Luo CW, Huang ZY, Chen XM, Li K, Chen Y, Sun YY 2011. Contribution of diurnal and nocturnal insects to the pollination of Jatropha curcas (Euphorbiaceae) in southwestern China. Journal of Economic Entomology 104: 149-154.
Luo CW, Li K, Chen XM, Huang ZY. 2012. Ants contribute significantly to the pollination of a biodiesel plant, Jatropha curcas. Environmental Entomology 41: 1163-1168.
Marten-Rodriguez S, Fenster CB. 2008. Pollination ecology and breeding systems of five Gesneria species from Puerto Rico. Annals of Botany 102: 23-30.
Moller H. 1996. Lessons for invasion theory from social insects. Biological Conservation 78: 125-142.
Ngumbi E, Chen L, Fadamiro HY. 2009. Comparative GC-EAD responses of a specialist (Microplitis croceipes) and a generalist (Cotesia marginiventris) parasitoid to cotton volatiles induced by two caterpillar species. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35: 1009-1020.
Oliveira P. 1997. The ecological function of extrafloral nectaries: herbivore deterrence by visiting ants and reproductive output in Caryocar brasiliense (Caryocaraceae). Functional Ecology 11: 323-330.
Raju AS, Ezradanam V. 2002. Pollination ecology and fruiting behaviour in a monoecious species Jatropha curcas L. (Euphorbiaceae). Current Science-Bangalore 83: 1395-1397.
Tasin M, Backman A-C, Anfora G, Carlin S, Ioriatti C, Witzgall P. 2010. Attraction of female grapevine moth to common and specific olfactory cues from 2 host plants. Chemical Senses 35: 57-64.
Thomson JD, Goodell K. 2001. Pollen removal and deposition by honeybee and bumblebee visitors to apple and almond flowers. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 1032-1044.
Tsuji K, Hasyim A, Harlion, Nakamura K. 2004. Asian weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina, and their repelling of pollinators. Ecological Research 19: 669-673.
Visser D, Wright M, Giliomee J. 1996. The effect of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), on flower-visiting insects of Protea nitida Mill. (Proteaceae). African Entomology 4: 285-287.
Way M, Khoo K. 1992. Role of ants in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology 37: 479-503.
Willmer PG, Stone GN. 1997. How aggressive ant-guards assist seed-set in Acacia flowers. Nature 388: 165-167.
Yan X, Han R, Moens M, Chen S, De Clercq P. 2013. Field evaluation of entomopathogenic nematodes for biological control of striped flea beetle, Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). BioControl 58: 247-256.
Duan Wu (1, 2), Ling Zeng (1), Yongyue Lu (1), and Yijuan Xu (1) *
(1) Red Imported Fire Ant Research Center, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
(2) Yuncheng Center of Agricultural Technology Extension, Yunfu 527300, Guangdong Province, China
* Corresponding author; E-mail: email@example.com
Caption: Fig. 1. Means ([+ or -] SE) of species richness (A) and total number (B) of flower visitors on Brassica napus in fire ant-excluded, fire ant-included, and fire-ant- and-aphid-included plots.
Caption: Fig. 2. Daily number (mean [+ or -] SE, the number of Frankliniella intonsa was calculated per 10 min per 10 flowers) of flower visitors on Brassica napus in fire ant-excluded, fire ant-included, and fire-ant-and-aphid-included plots.
Caption: Fig. 3. The cumulative probability of visiting frequency and duration of each visit of Pieris rapae on Brassica napus in fire ant-excluded, fire ant-included, and fire-ant-and-aphid-included plots.
Caption: Fig. 4. GC-EAD responses of Pieris rapae males to volatiles of Solenopsis invicta. GC-EAD active compounds: (1) n-tricosane; (2) 3-methyl tricosane; (3) unknown; (4) n-pentacosane; (5) 13-methyl pentacosane; (6) n-heptacosane; (7) 13,15-dimethyl heptacosane.
Table 1. Effect of Solenopsis invicta and its interaction with aphids on the flower-visiting efficiency of Pieris rapae and Apis cerana on Brassica napus. Visitor Parameter Plot without fire Plot with ants and aphids fire ants P. rapae Visiting frequency 7.32 [+ or -] 7.24 [+ or -] 0.77a 0.50a Duration of each 8.85 [+ or -] 6.24 [+ or -] visit 1.30a 0.59b A. cerana Visiting frequency 12.42 [+ or -] 13.31 [+ or -] 0.49a 0.79a Duration of each 2.81 [+ or -] 2.72 [+ or -] visit 0.35a 0.26a Visitor Parameter Plot with fire F P ants and aphids P. rapae Visiting frequency 7.42 [+ or -] 0.163 0.852 0.58a Duration of each 6.87 [+ or -] 10.83 0.002 visit 0.73b A. cerana Visiting frequency 13.05 [+ or -] 3.305 0.072 0.30a Duration of each 2.51 [+ or -] 1.684 0.227 visit 0.14a Data (mean [+ or -] SE) in the same row followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05, Tukey's post hoc comparison). Table 2. Quantification of GC-EAD responses of Pieris rapae males to the volatile compounds of Solenopsis invicta. Concentration n-Tricosane n-Pentacosane 0.01 mg/mL 0.836 [+ or -] 0.082ab 0.744 [+ or -] 0.052a 1 mg/mL 0.786 [+ or -] 0.101a 0.842 [+ or -] 0.063a Concentration n-Heptacosane F P 0.01 mg/mL 1.032 [+ or -] 0.073b 4.362 0.023 1 mg/mL 1.034 [+ or -] 0.039a 3.084 0.062 Data (mean [+ or -] SE) in the same row followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05, Tukey's post hoc comparison).
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Wu, Duan; Zeng, Ling; Lu, Yongyue; Xu, Yijuan|
|Date:||Jun 1, 2016|
|Previous Article:||Myrmecofauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) response to habitat characteristics of tropical montane cloud forests in central Veracruz, Mexico.|
|Next Article:||Toxicity of plant extracts to Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).|