Effect of Different Nest Box Materials on the Mating of European Bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) under Controlled Environmental Conditions.
Abstract We examined the possible effect of different box materials in relation to time interval on the mating of European bumblebee Bombus terrestris under controlled environmental conditions. The lowest rate of mating was found in wooden box with mean of 49% pairs and the highest mating tendency was found in polycarbonate box. Further in relation to time interval during the first minutes of introduction of queens and males in mating cage significant difference between all three boxes showed the highest mating rate within first minutes in polycarbonate box. Similarly during the five minutes of time interval from introduction mating tendency was high in polycarbonate box which was 1-2 fold higher from iron mesh box and wooden box. During the time elapse of fifteen minutes of introduction of queens and males in the mating cage there existed no significant difference between the polycarbonate box and iron mesh box but significantly different in wooden box.
Such important abiotic affect of mating environment suggests the possibilities for higher mating tendency needed for their commercial breeding programs.
Key words: Bombus terrestris mating requirement box material time interval. INTRODUCTION
Bumblebees are imperative pollinators of a variety of greenhouse crops mainly effective in pollinating for the solanaceous family commercial plants like eggplant and tomato (Buchmann and Hurley 1978; Free 1993). Their effective crop pollination and flower visitation inside enclosed farming systems has given the growers the chance to reduce the work expenses of pollination and assure high quality yield (Iwasaki 1995). Bumblebee and honeybees keep the record of suitable host plants for food reserves and best pollinator with their rapid learning abilities (Ali et al. 2014). Bumblebees are the most commonly used pollinators for the pollination of mostly greenhouse crops. Five different bumblebee species viz. Bombus terrestris L. B. lucorum B. occidentalis B. ignitus and B. impatiens are reared commercially to meet the needs of farmers for crop pollination with B. terrestris being the most commonly used species.
With increase in area under enclosed farming of vegetables and fruits their demand has increased with time and more than a million colonies of the bumblebees per year are used by the farmers to meet their needs (Velthuis and Doorn 2006). Indigenous bumblebee species B. haemorrhoidalis Smith has been considered important to rear and use for greenhouse pollination (Umer et al. 2014) Bumblebee produces large colonies and adapts quite well to artificial environment. Even though the production techniques have been developed since 1987 of its commercialization some problems of increasing the quantity and quality of artificially reared colonies in commercial rearing is still felt (Hughes 1996). There exist variation in the number of males workers and daughter queens produced (Beekman and van Stratum 2000). Queens are the only caste to overwinter (enter diapause)
During the last stage of colony sexuals are produced and mating is done after mating queens went to diapause and remaining males and workers die in the colony. In early spring queens that overwintered leave their hibernation sites. The queen builds up a mass of pollen and lays her first batch eggs into the pollen mass after searching appropriate place to found a colony. Once the workers of the first brood have emerged they take over the foraging duties of the queen who from now on spends her time mostly on the laying of eggs. In the late summer many males and new queens are produced and only mated queens hibernate and emerge in spring (Heinrich 2004; Duchateau and Velthusis 1988).
An important stage in the life of bumblebees is mating. B. terrestris males consist of patrolling performance during which secretions from the cephalic labial gland are deposited on marking spots (Schmid-Hempel and Schmid-Hempel 2000). Males of bumblebee released special pheromones during flight by scent-marking plants and they try to copulate with young queens encountered on their flight-path (Svensson 1980; Williams 1991). The special type of pheromones which secreted by the male from the cephalic labial gland has been identified as farnesol. The young unmated queens also secrete sex pheromones from their mandibular glands to attract the males (van Honk et al. 1978; Bergstrom 1981). Djegham et al. (1994) produced a precopulatory ethogram for B. terrestris in a cage where no nuptial route could be established.
Malemale rivalry over access to females has led to the evolution of various adaptations to make the most of male mating success and paternity among offspring. e.g. during mating males may transfer not only sperm but also chemical substances into the female's sexual tract which increase the likelihood of paternity (male mating success) (Price et al. 1999; Gonzalez et al. 1999; Soller et al. 1997). Such chemical compounds are produced in the male accessory gland of insects (Gillott 1996) known to induce behavioral and physiological changes in the mated female insects (Wolfner 1997; Yi and Gillott 1999).
Mating success in social insects is especially interesting. In particular whether one or several males succeed in mating with a single queen affects the average relatedness among workers in the colony. This leads to variation in a number of key parameters of sociality such as the level of cooperation (Keller and Reeve 1994) or sex allocation to offspring (Boomsma and Grafen 1990). For the social Hymenoptera information on queen mating behavior is available but male reproductive skews i.e. sperm bias are poorly investigated including the function and biology of the male accessory gland. Given the observed variation in female mating frequency and sperm bias (Boomsma and Ratnieks 1996) more information is needed about the function and the biochemistry of these compounds in social insects. This could help in understanding recently discussed topics such as the observed differences in queen mating frequencies among females and among taxa.
Queens of B. terrestris appear to be singly mated in Central Europe (Schmid-Hempel and Schmid-Hempel 2000). During the personal observation they often refused to re-mate in flight cages although queens would benefit from multiple mating by higher fitness and lower parasite loads (Baer and Schmid-Hempel 1999). Therefore queens do not take advantage of the benefits of multiple mating. Different abiotic conditions have their considerable contribution in mating success of bumblebees including specific intensity light frequency temperature relative humidity photoperiod food and biotic conditions including age and size or weight of the males and virgin queens (Leather et al. 1993; Germ and Kral 1995; Kwon et al. 2006; Yoon et al. 2007; Amin et al. 2010 2012). In this study we have investigated the effect of different box materials on the mating of the European bumblebee.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Present work was conducted to study the effect of box material on mating of the European bumblebee Bombus terrestris L. under standard laboratory conditions in Non-Apis Bee Laboratory Department of Entomology Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi during 2013-2014. Experimental daughter queens and males of B. terrestris were obtained from bumblebee hives imported from Koppert Biological Systems Netherlands and reared on fresh and frozen honeybee collected pollen with commercial grade sucrose sugar at 50% concentration. These bee hives were assigned numbers for identification and collection of daughter queens and males kept in different boxes with nectar and pollens based on age and mother colony number to distinguish. Daughter queens were mated with the males of same species belonging to different bumblebee hives to avoid inbreeding problems.
After mating in special mating cages daughter queens were feed for about a week period and kept for diapause in refrigerator at 2.5 degree centigrade for 2.5 months period after CO2 exposure (Tasei and Aupinel 2008). Hibernated queens were later removed from low temperature environment and kept in a cage for CO2 nacrosis (Velthuis and Doorn 2006).
Climatic conditions in rearing room
The basic colony-rearing technique was followed as described by (Yoon and Kim 2002). The experimental groups were reared in three sizes of plastic made boxes with clean hard card paper for nest initiation. Colony initiation or small (17 12 10 cm) colony foundation or medium (22.0 17.0 10.0 cm) and colony maturation or large box (25.0 25.0 25.0 cm) were provided as per need of the colony stage. In all types of nest boxes small holes were equipped at front wall of the chamber and at both sides of the walls. To minimize the risk of fungus inside rearing boxes were checked and cleaned every day with a piece of cotton soaked with 75% ethyl alcohol in fume hood to remove the maximum of alcohol to evaporate before reuse.
Glass plates were used as lids and covered with black sheet. The climatic conditions were kept at 252oC and 6010% relative humidity (Duchateau and Velthuis 1988).
To examine the effect of box material on the mating efficiency of bumblebee we used three types of box i.e. made of wooden material iron mesh and polycarbonate box with same internal size of 0.5A-0.7A-1m3 each. At the time of climax when queen of colony switch to produce males and daughter queens these all newly emerged males and queens were collected from the colonies and placed in separate boxes with emergence date and assigned a specific number to each box to prevent inbreeding problem. These newly emerged males and queens were fed with 50% sugar solution and fresh pollen collected from honeybee hive and these males and queens and kept at standard laboratory conditions (Duchateau and Velthuis 1988).
When the age of queens reached at seven days and males at ten days from the ones kept from different colonies with proper marking they were then used for the experimentation of their mating tendency. In each box 1:2 ratios of males to queens i.e. 15 queens and 30 males were used to mate and there were fifteen replications in each box. After the introduction of males and queens in the mating cage data were recorded in three intervals for total number of pairs within first one minute total number of pairs within first five minutes and total number of pairs within fifteen minutes. Overall mating percentage was also recorded in tested three mating cage types.
Means of different mating parameters were subjected to statistical methods using means SD and compared with ANOVA at 5% probability for comparison of percentage values. Chi-squares analysis was performed using SPSS software (NorusICE SPSS Inc. 2006).
A total of 675 daughter queens and 1350 males of B. terrestris were used in this experiment to observe the mating tendency in relation to three different type of mating box made with different materials.
Single mating rate within one minute of introduction
Latency (time between introduction of queens and males into mating cage until their copulation initiation) showed significant variation on mating rate of bumblebees during first minute in the mating cages. Highest pairing occurred in polycarbonate box (3.661.95) followed by iron mesh box and wooden box (1.861.18 0.46+0.74) respectively. Box material showed significant affect on the mating tendency during first minutes of released (df= 2 44 F= 20.1 Pless than 0.05) (Table I). Copulation rate was 24% in polycarbonate box followed by 12% and 3% in iron mesh box and wooden box within one minute of sexuals introduction (Fig. 1).
Single mating rate within five minutes of introduction
After five minutes of introduction of sexuals in mating cages the highest number of pairs were
Table I. Effect of boxes material on mating of Bombus terrestris with different interval of time period.
Mating boxes###Copulation within 1###Copulation within 5###Copulation within in###Total mating %
###(pairs in number)a###(pairs in number)a###(pairs in number)a
Wooden box###0.470.74 c###1.46+1.25 c###3.731.57 a###49.39.01 c
Iron mesh box###1.91.18 b###2.661.17 b###3.331.29 a###61.78.1 b
Polycarbonate box###3.661.95 a###4.331.54 a###2.330.81 b###75.110.5 a
collected from polycarbonate box (4.331.54) followed by 2.661.17 in iron mesh box. The percentage of copulation observed in wooden box was 1.46+1.25 (F= 17.6 Pless than 0.05) (Table I). Copulation rate was 38% in polycarbonate box followed by 20% and 10% in iron mesh box and wooden box respectively within five minutes of sexual introduction (Fig. 1).
Mating rate within fifteen minutes of introduction
There appeared non-significant difference for bumblebee mating rate in wooden box (3.731.57) and iron mesh box (3.331.29) during the fifteen minutes of time interval from the introduction of queens and males however both were significant than polycarbonate (2.330.81) (F= 4.99 Pless than 0.05) (Table I). Copulation rate was 29% in polycarbonate box followed by 32% and 28.4% in iron mesh box and wooden box respectively within fifteen minutes of sexuals introduction (Fig. 1).
Box material showed significant affect on the mating tendency (df= 2 44 F= 28.9 Pless than 0.05). Some males and daughter queens started mating and number of mating tendency differed in different treatments (Table I). Mating percentage was the highest in polycarbonate box (75.110.5%) followed by iron mesh box and wooden box (61.78.1% 49.39.01%) respectively. Out of 225 queens released in polycarbonate box 169 queens mated whereas 139 and 111 queen mated with males in iron mesh box and wooden box respectively. Overall result showed that polycarbonate plastic box is the most suitable for mating during three times observed followed by iron mesh box and then wooden box.
Different box materials and time elapse of males and queen introduction showed a strong effect on the mating success of B. terrestris. The highest mating success was found in the polycarbonate box. This might be due to transparent character of this mating cage making light availability significantly more. In this mating cage 1000 to 2000 lux light intensity was observed which is considered most effective for mating of B. terrestris inside controlled mating (Yoon et al. 2007). Natural mating of bumblebees has been observed during day light and photoperiod had shown pronounced affect on different behaviors of bumblebees especially the mating tendency and success rate (Leather et al. 1993; Kwon et al. 2006). Light assert the sexual maturity and pheromone production and may change in behavior by changing neurotransmitter concentration in brains (Germ and Kral 1995).
Clear and transparent surface of polycarbonate mating cage might have influence to resist negligible for light to penetrate and actively affect the mating rate inside. Other environmental factors like temperature relative humidity food and enclosed environment has impact on different biological life process including mating in bees (Kwon et al. 2006). Copulation rate in bumblebees is also influenced and optimum temperature observed previously was 23oC proving to be the most favorable for this important life continuing process in the solitary bee B. terrestris (Amin et al. 2010). We maintained temperature of the mating room around 20-25oC which was almost same inside the polycarbonate mating cage providing the best temperature environment. Wooden box needed more time to attain the desired temperature which desired the upper surface of the wooden mating cage to remain open of covered with polycarbonate sheet. There might have been some inclusive impact of that surface.
We observed overall maximum copulation rate in iron mesh cage where the temperature was almost the same of that in the mating room. This however was close to that observed in polycarbonate mating cage.
Material of the mating cage thus influenced this copulation process and directly proportional on mating latency (time elapsed between the introduction of queens and males in mating cage until initiation of copulation). During the first and five minutes of introduction of males and queens to mate mating rate was the highest in polycarbonate box and lowest in wooden box. Major factors affecting time latency might include the light intensity and temperature. In natural bumblebee life systems males patrol and scent the routes with their pheromones to attract females to visit these routes and get copulated by these males (Schmid-Hempel and Schmid-Hempel 2000). The activity of males for patrolling and marking is highly affected by the temperature and optimum light. Low light intensity in wooden and iron mesh mating cages might have impact on the copulation rate. Copulation time period was more in these cages and queens required longer time to detect each other (Bourke 1997; Estoup et al. 1995).
Heavy males were quick in selection of virgin queens to mate which lasted for less time than other males to increase the mating success rate however their age have no significant affect (Amin et al. 2010 2012). Combination of different abiotic conditions in mating success of bumblebees include specific intensity light frequency temperature relative humidity photoperiod food and biotic conditions of age and size or weight of the males and virgin queens have their influence however the environment for their mating also highlights the material of the cage used for their mating success and tendency (Leather et al. 1993; Germ and Kral 1995; Kwon et al. 2006; Yoon et al. 2007; Amin et al. 2010 2012).
In conclusion mating or copulation rate of bumblebees in relation to mating cage material and time interval are of practical relevance wishing to induce mating in bumblebees for commercial breeding systems of these bees. Polycarbonate box material proved the most suitable for bumblebee mating in enclosed laboratory rearing or breeding programs to achieve maximum copulation and enhance their mated queen to initiate more hives for next cycle. We believe such studies will be helpful regarding mating behavior for effective bumblebee rearing programs and contribute more for enhancing their role in crop pollination of enclosed farming systems with better qualitative and quantitative production and good economic returns.
The present studies were kindly financed by the Higher Education Commission Government of Pakistan under Bumblebee laboratory rearing project and indigenous fellowship for the first author for his PhD studies. We are thankful to Umer Ayyaz and Muhammad Nasir for their help in rearing of bumblebees. We are also thankful to our anonymous reviewers for their kind inputs and improvement suggestions for this manuscript.
ALI M. SAEED S. SAJJAD A. AND BASHIR M.A. 2014. Exploring the best native pollinators for pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) production in Punjab Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool. 46: 531-539. AMIN M.R. THAN K.K. AND KWON Y.J. 2010. Mating status of bumblebees Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) with notes on ambient temperature age and virginity. J. appl. Ent. Zool. 45: 363-367.
AMIN M.R. BUSSIARE L.F. AND GOULSON D. 2012. Effects of male age and size on mating success in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. J. Insect Behav. 25: 362374. BAER B. AND SCHMID-HEMPEL P. 1999. Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumblebee. Nature 397:151154
BEEKMAN M. AND VAN STRATUM P. 2000. Does the diapause experience of bumblebee queens Bombus terrestris affect colony characteristics Ecol. Ent. 25: 1-6.
BERGSTROM G. 1981. Chemical composition similarity and dissimilarity in volatile secretions: examples of indications of biological function Les mAdiateurs chimiques agissant sur le comportment des insects. pp. 289-296.
BOOMSMA J.J. AND GRAFEN A. 1990. Intraspecific variation in ant sex ratios and the Trivers-Hare hypothesis. Evolution 44:10261034. BOOMSMA J.J. AND RATNIEKS F.L.W. 1996. Paternity in eusocial Hymenoptera. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 351:947975. BOURKE A.F.G. 1997. Sex ratios in bumble bees. Phil.
Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 352: 1921-1933. BUCHMANN S.T.L. AND HURLEY J.P. 1978. A biophysical model for buzz pollination in angiosperms. J. theor. Biol. 72: 639-657.
DJEGHAM Y. XVERHAEGHE J.C. AND RASMOUT P. 1994. Copulation of Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in captivity. J. Apic. Res. 33: 15-20. DUCHATEAU M.J. AND VELTHUIS H.H.W. 1988.
Development and reproductive strategies in Bombus terrestris colonies. Behaviour 107: 186-207. ESTOUP A. SCHOLL A. POUVREAU A. AND SOLIGNAC M. 1995. Monoandry and polyandry in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Bombinae) as evidenced by highly variable microsatellites. J. mol. Ecol. 4: 89 93.
FREE J.B. 1993. Insect pollination of crops. 2nd ed. Academic Press London. GERM M. AND KRAL K. 1995. Influence of visual deprivation on levels of dopamine and serotonin in the visual system of house crickets Acheta domesticus. J. Insect Physiol.41: 57-63. GILLOTT C. 1996. Male insect accessory glands: Functions and control of secretory activity. Inverteb. Reprod. Develop. 30:199205. GONZALEZ A. ROSSINI C. EISENER M. AND EISENER T. 1999. Sexually transmitted chemical defense in a moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc. natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 55705574.
HEINRICH B. 2004. Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press Cambridge United Kingdom pp. 245. HUGHES M.J. 1996. Commercial rearing of bumble bees. In: Bumble bees for pleasure and profit (ed. A. Matheson). IBRA Cardiff UK pp. 40-47. IWASAKI M. 1995. Introduction of commercial bumblebees into Japan. Honeybee Sci. 16: 17-21.
KELLER L. AND REEVE H.K. 1994. Genetic variability queen number and polyandry in social Hymenoptera. Evolution 48:694704. KWON Y.J. AMIN M.R. AND SUHS S.J. 2006. Mating propensity of Bombus terrestris reared in different photoperiodic regimes. Apidologie 37: 679-686. LEATHER S.R. WALTERS K.F.A. AND BALE J.S. 1993. The ecology of insect overwintering Cambridge Univ. Press UK.
NORUSICH M.J. 2006. Software of SPSS12. Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall SPSS Inc. N. J.PRICE C.S. DYER K.A. AND COYNE J.A. 1999. Sperm competition between Drosophila males involves both displacement and incapacitation. Nature 400:449452. SCHMID-HEMPEL R. AND SCHMID-HEMPEL P. 2000. Female mating frequencies in social insects: Bombus spp. from Central Europe. J. Insect. Soc.47: 3641.
SOLLER M. BOWNES M. AND KUBLI E. 1997. Mating and sex peptide stimulate the accumulation of yolk in oocytes of Drosophila melanogaster. Eur. J. Biochem. 243:732738.
SVENSSON B.G. 1980. Species-isolating mechanisms in male bumble bees (Hymenoptera Apidae). Acta Univ. Supsaliensis Abstr. Uppsala Dissertation Fac. Sci. No. 549 pp. 1-41.
TASEI J. N. AND AUPINEL P. 2008. Nutritive values of 15 single pollens and pollen mixes tested on larvae produced by bumblebee workers. J. Apidol. 39: 397- 409.
UMER A.A.S. MUNIR A. IMRAN M. NASIR M. SHAFQAT S. AND IMRAN B. 2014. Distribution of bumblebee Bombus haemorrhoidalis Smith and its association with flora in lower northern Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool. 46: 1045-1051.
VAN HONK C.G.J. VELTHUIS H.H.W. AND ROSELER P.F. 1978. A sex pheromone from the mandibular glands in bumblebee queens. Experientia 34: 838-839.
VELTHUIS H.H.W. AND van DOORN A. 2006. A century of advances in bumblebee domestication and the economic and environmental aspects of its commercialization for pollination. J. Apidol. 37: 421- 451. WILLIAMS P.H. 1991. The bumble bees of the Kashmir Himalaya (Hymenoptera: Apidae Bombini). Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) 60: 1-204.
WOLFNER M.F. 1997. Tokens of love: Functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem. mol. Biol. 27:179192. YI S.X. AND GILLOTT C. 1999. Purification and characterization of an oviposition-stimulating protein of the long hyaline tubules in the male migratory grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes.J. Insect Physiol. 45:143150.
YOON H.J. AND KIM S.E. 2002. Facilitating effect of helpers on oviposition and colony development of bumblebee queen Bombus ignitus. Korean J. appl. Ent. 41: 239-245.
YOON H.J. KIM S.E. LEE K.Y. LEE S.B. AND PARK I.G. 2007. Mating conditions favorable for improving mating rate of the bumblebee Bombus ignitus. Int. J. Indust. Ent. 15: 107-114.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Pakistan Journal of Zoology|
|Date:||Feb 28, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Dose Related Histological Changes in Mouse Kidney After Administration of Manuka Honey.|
|Next Article:||Association of High Prevalence of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci With Unsafe Waste Disposal Practices in Poultry Shops.|