While JSLP-ABA seeks to further the science of SLP and ABA, we certainly understand that the papers submitted to our journal will have an impact beyond the scientific community as well. We have included in this issue a letter to the editor, from a legal advocate for children with autism, which we believe speaks to this point. While we do not agree with the writer's interpretations or with her allegations, we believe that she has the right to be heard, and it is in that spirit that we published her letter.
Finally, the mission of JSLP-ABA is "to provide a forum for SLP and ABA professionals to exchange information on topics of mutual interest" (see http://www.slp-aba.com/mission.html. These professionals have strong backgrounds in research design, and many have published research themselves. This background entails an understanding of and respect for the scientific process, including research, critique, and refinement of research. Schoenberg's paper raised valid issues regarding research methodology. Readers of JSLP-ABA understand that critical analysis is a crucial part of the scientific process. We encourage and support the right of Howard et al. to provide further information, to engage in further research, or some combination of the two; and we support Mr. Schoneberger's right as a scientist to critique their work.
Joe Cautilli, Lead Editor
Mareile Koenig, Senior Associate Editor
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Cautilli, Joe; Koenig, Mareile|
|Publication:||The Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis|
|Date:||Jun 22, 2007|
|Previous Article:||Response to Schoneberger (2006): "EIBT Research After Lovaas (1987): A Tale of Two Studies".|
|Next Article:||Autism research controversy: a response to Howard et al.'s (2005) defenders.|