The articles in this issue are indicative of the way recent studies have considered the international dimension of the war. They do not represent a new research agenda but suggest common problems being studied and possibilities for new work. Leading off the selections, Michael A. Morrison reconsiders the visit of Magyar leader Louis Kossuth to the United States, indicating that the sectional crisis altered Americans' perceptions of revolutionary movements and their own public memory. Next, Lorraine Peters shifts the view from Britain to Scotland to see what a community study can reveal about European support for America's war. In the third selection, Hugh Dubrulle challenges the notion that the American war left no imprint on the British military. Additionally, the book review section opens with an examination of Richard Blackett's recent, thoughtful study on Britain and the American Civil War. Together, these scholars show that we have moved beyond the tendency to see support for the war in stark, class terms, expanding on the pivotal work of Mary Ellison's Support for Secession (1972), whose study of Lancashire first muddied the scholarly waters. Economic determinism also has broken down as a predictive factor, although economic elements have not been eliminated from the equation. Ironically, the studies suggest that a person's transatlantic perspective was shaped by nationalistic concerns--or even far more parochial ones. Politics and social/economic struggles at home mattered a great deal in how a person digested the various contending currents sweeping the world.
Even these works just scratch the surface of possibilities of the international war. The articles in this issue grapple primarily with the influences of transatlantic thought and the reasons behind identification with Northern and Southern combatants. Old-fashioned diplomacy may be worth a second look, as might the Caribbean rim in general, the spread of cultural ideals, the attempts to expand the slave empire or capitalize on an illegal slave trade, the similarities and differences of civil wars in the nineteenth century or beyond, and the problems of creating new meanings of freedom and citizenship around the globe in this formative time for nation-state building. The American Civil War may not have been a worldwide one, but its fuller international dimension may yet reap fresh discoveries for those willing to brave the exploration.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Civil War History|
|Date:||Jun 1, 2003|
|Previous Article:||Internet resources. (Endnotes).|
|Next Article:||American reaction to European revolutions, 1848-1852: sectionalism, memory, and the revolutionary heritage.|