Printer Friendly

Echocardiography in the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy/Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopati tedavisinde ekokardiyografi.

ABSTRACT

Echocardiography is the best technique to diagnose, evaluate, follow-up and guide the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Diagnosis of HCM depends on left ventricular wall thickness [greater than or equal to]15 mm. Also noted are mitral valve systolic anterior motion, anteriorly positioned mitral valve leaflet coaptation, anomalous anterior insertion of papillary muscles, and diastolic dysfunction. Resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient occurs in 25% of patients and provocable gradients may be demonstrated in more than half of patients. Echocardiography is important for sudden death risk assessment; patients with a wall thickness more than 30 mm have a higher risk of sudden cardiac death, as often as 2%/year. Two thirds of the symptomatic obstructed patients can be successfully managed long term with medical treatment alone (beta-blockers, disopyramide, verapamil) guided by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) response and follow-up. Obstructed patients, who fail medical therapy, are usually offered invasive treatment: surgical septal myectomy, alcohol septal ablation, or DDD pacemaker. Preoperative TTE is a necessary guide for the surgeon in planning the operation. It gives the surgeon precise measurements of septal thickness, mitral valve leaflets length and floppiness and papillary muscle anomalies. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is a very important tool for evaluating surgical results. Persistent SAM, resting outflow gradient more than 30 mm Hg or more than 50 mmHg with provocation, moderate to severe mitral regurgitation are indications for immediate revision. For patients > 40 years old, and also not suitable for surgery because of comorbidities, alcohol septal ablation is viable alternative therapy for relief of obstruction and improvement of symptoms. Echocardiography is a valuable tool to choose the site of ablation (using myocardial contrast echocardiography), as well as for evaluation of results. (Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2006; 6 Suppl 2: 18-26)

Key words: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, obstructive HCM treatment, disopyramide, septal myectomy, alcohol septal ablation, echocardiography

OZET

Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopati (HKM) tanisinda, degerlendirmesinde, takibinde ve tedavi kilavuzlugunda en iyi teknik ekokardiyografidir. Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopati tanisi sol ventrikul duvar kalinligi >=15mm oldugunda konulmaktadir. Bununla birlikte mitral kapagin one sistolik hareketi (SAM), mitral kapakciklarin koaptasyonunun anteriyor konumu, papiller adalelerin anormal anteriyor lokalizasyonu ve diyastolik disfonksiyon gorulebilir. Istirahat sol ventrikul cikis gradiyenti (SVCG) hastalarin %25 inde ve provokasyonla ortaya cikan gradiyentler hastalarin >%50 gorulmektedir. Ekokardiyografi ani kardiyak olumun risk degerlendirmesi icin onemli bir yontemdir ve 30 mm den fazla duvar kalinligi olan hastalarda ani olum riski daha yuksektir, yilda %2 prevalansi vardir. Semptomatik obstruksiyonu olan hastalari n 2/3 ekokardiyografi kilavuzlugunda ve takibinde sadece uzun sureli medikal tedavi ile (beta-blokerler, disopiramid, verapamil) basarili olarak takip edilebilirler. Medikal tedaviye cevap vermeyen ve obstruksiyonu olan hastalara genellikle cerrahi septal miyektomi, alkol septal ablasyonu veya DDD pacemaker onerilir. Preoperatif transtorasik ekokardiyografi (TTE), ameliyati planlayan cerrah icin vazgecilmez bir kilavuzdur. Ekokardiyografi cerraha septal kalinliginin kesin olcumlerini, mitral yaprakciklarin uzunlugunu, sarkmasini ve papiller adale anomalilerini gosterir. Cerrahi sonucunun degerlendirmesinde intraoperatif transozofajiyal ekokardiyografi cok onemli bir aractir. Acil revizyon icin endikasyonlar sunlardir: persistan SAM, 30 mmHg'dan fazla olan istirahat veya provokasyonla 50 mmHg cikis yolu gradiyenti ve orta/siddetli mitral regurjitasyonu. Yasi 40 tan fazla olan veya komorbiditeler nedeni ile cerrahi icin uygun olmayan hastalarda obstruksiyonun hafisetilmesi ve semptomlarin iyilesmesi icin alkol septal ablasyonu canli bir alternatif terapidir. Islemin sonuclarini degerlendirmede ve ablasyonun yerini belirlemede (miyokardiyal kontrast ekokardiyografi araci ile) ekokardiyografi cok degerli bir yontemdir. (Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2006; 6 Ozel Sayi 2: 18-26)

Anahtar kelimeler: Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopati, obstruktif HKM tedavisi, disopiramid, septal miyektomi, alkol septal ablasyonu, ekokardiyografi

Role of echocardiography in diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is clinically defined by a hypertrophied non-dilated left ventricle in the absence of another cardiac or systemic disease capable of producing the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy observed (1). Echocardiography (echo), widely available, noninvasive, of relatively low cost and with no contraindications (except sometimes for poor imaging quality) has proved over the years, to be the best technique to diagnose, evaluate, follow-up and guide the treatment of HCM (2-5). Most recent advances towards understanding the pathophysiology, and developing treatments have employed echo (6,7).

Early echo studies of HCM had used M-mode. A septal to posterior wall thickness ratio of 1.3:1 was considered evidence of inappropriate septal hypertrophy. With two-dimensional echo the presence, magnitude, and distribution of left ventricular hypertrophy can now be accurately determined. When combined with color flow and spectral Doppler imaging, echo can fully delineate the entire spectrum of hemodynamic abnormalities seen in HCM (8).

Currently, HCM is identified by virtue of a maximal left ventricular wall thickness of 15 mm in adult patients or the equivalent wall thickness relative to body-surface area, in children (1). This represents an unambiguous and conservative cutoff value. Other features, useful but not necessary in diagnosing HCM, are: 1) mitral valve systolic anterior motion (absent or mild in nonobstructed pattern) (9); 2) anteriorly positioned mitral valve leaflet coaptation (10,11); 3) anomalous anterior insertion of papillary muscles (12,13), 4) diastolic dysfunction. When a patient is referred for evaluation and diagnosis of HCM, echo is useful for assessing the anatomic type, presence of obstruction, and future risk for sudden cardiac death.

Echocardiography role in defining types and assessing obstruction in HCM

Classical HCM is described as asymmetric hypertrophy of the septum involving the subaortic area of the LV outflow tract. Besides this pattern, HCM can present with hypertrophy in any segment. According to the degree and distribution of hypertrophy in left ventricular (LV) short axis views, Gregor et al described 5 types of HCM: 1) type I--hypertrophy affecting only the interventricular septum; 2) type II--hypertrophy involving besides the septum, also the left ventricular (LV) anterior or lateral wall; 3) type III--hypertrophy of the LV posterior wall; 4) type IV--distinct hypertrophy of the whole apical LV and septum; and 5) type V--concentric hypertrophy of the LV and septum (14). Type II pattern is the most frequent (67%) followed by type I (14%), with least encountered being the type III (4%). Other studies have confirmed that HCM mainly occurs in one of the three major areas: septum, mid cavity or apical (15-18). There was no evidence of a transformation from one form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to the other (15). All three forms could present with or without obstruction, though obstruction is uncommon in the mid and apical variants.

During the echo evaluation of patients with HCM it is important to assess for obstruction, both by evaluating anatomy--i.e. mitral-septal contact or systolic wall apposition--and by Doppler (19). Obstruction in HCM is a dynamic phenomenon, depending on the loading conditions and contractility. Resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient occurs in 25% of patients but provocable gradients are more prevalent and obstruction may be demonstrated in more than half of patients after exercise (20). In non-obstructive patients it is important to try provocative maneuvers to elicit obstruction because obstruction offers a target for treatment of symptoms. Provocative maneuvers are done during pulsed or continuous wave Doppler in 5-chamber and 3-chamber apical views (21), and include: Valsalva's maneuver (22-24), standing up from a lying down position (22), postprandial (25), treadmill exercise (20), amyl nitrite inhalation (20,26). Amyl nitrite and dobutamine are not physiologic stimuli, which do not mimic activities of daily life and generally are not recommended. Also, dobutamine may cause obstruction in normals.

Echocardiography and risk for sudden cardiac death assessment

Several factors are known to be indicators of a risk of sudden death: a previous aborted cardiac arrest, one or more episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, unexplained syncope, and a history of sudden death in young family members (27-31). Using 2D echocardiographic measurements Spirito et al showed that the risk of sudden death increased progressively in direct relation to wall thickness (P=0.001). The risk of sudden death was less than 2.6 per 1000 person-years in those with a wall thickness less than 19 mm, and went up to 18.2 per 1000 person-years (1.8%/ year) in those with a wall thickness of 30 mm or more (31) (Fig. 1). Some patients deemed to be at increased risk for sudden cardiac death because of massive thickening may be offered prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement.

Treatment of symptoms

Treatment of HCM patients is guided by patient's symptoms and echo findings. In patients with no or only mild symptoms the approach of watchful waiting is often appropriate (19). Though patients with non-obstructive HCM are empirically offered verapamil and beta blockade to improve symptoms, relief of ischemia by limiting heart rate rise may be their main action.

Echocardiography is a valuable tool to understand the pathophysiology of obstruction. Echocardiography data indicates that systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is initiated by flow drag; the mitral valve is swept toward the septum by the pushing force of flow (Fig. 2). After mitral-septal contact, obstruction begets further obstruction as the pressure gradient pushes the mitral valve into the septum. The obstruction is best described as: flow drag triggered, time dependent, amplifying feedback loop (32-34) (Figures 3-5).

[FIGURES 2-5 OMITTED]

Two thirds of the symptomatic obstructed patients can be successfully managed long term with medical treatment alone without any other intervention (35). Drugs that are useful in treatment of obstruction are the negative inotropes ([beta]-blockers, verapamil, disopyramide). By reducing ejection acceleration of early flow, the early systolic pushing force on the protruding mitral leaflets is reduced, thus delaying the SAM and mitral-septal contact (33) (Fig. 6).

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

Finding the right medication and the right dosage for symptomatic patients can be challenging for the treating physician. The first step in medical treatment is stopping medications that may worsen obstruction: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, nifedipine, amlodipine, long and short acting nitrates and [beta]-blockers (36). The first medication to be tried in symptomatic patients are [beta]-blockers. After IV or oral [beta]-blocker administration, Doppler gradient is checked. If good response is achieved, with reduction of the gradient to less than 30 mmHg, [beta]-blockers are used as single therapy with a goal of resting heart rate between 55 and 60 bpm. Addition of disopyramide, or verapamil substitution is considered if symptoms persist and gradient remains more than 30 mmHg (36). At our institution the preference is to add disopyramide to [beta]-blockers for a synergistic effect. Repeat echo is done 2.5 hours after a single dose of 250 mg disopyramide, or 2 days after disopyramide controlled release (CR) 250 mg every 12 hours, has begun to assess acute response. Patients who respond to disopyramide with a gradient less than 30 mm Hg are continued on the combination. Amiodarone or any other antiarrhythmic drug are stopped when disopyramide is begun. In patients with contraindication to disopyramide, oral verapamil is begun at 240-360 mg/day in divided doses. When the gradient remains greater than 30 mmHg and patients are still symptomatic despite medication manipulation, Doppler examinations of left ventricular acceleration may help the clinician to decide further management (Fig. 6). If left ventricular acceleration is not significantly slowed by medical treatment, or if heart rate has not slowed, then the medication can be increased. If acceleration in the left ventricle has slowed but there is still significant obstruction, medication alone may not be adequate to eliminate obstruction because of adverse anatomy and further non-pharmacologic interventions are required (36, 37) (Fig. 7).

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

Echocardiography is extremely helpful for close monitoring of intravenous [beta]-blocker treatment of critically ill HCM patients with severe acute obstruction and congestive heart failure, where parameters can be followed in real time. The best pharmacologic combination for patients in shock due to obstruction is phenylephrine for pressure support and [beta]-blockers for decrease in gradient (33,36). Dobutamine or dopamine or epinephrine should be avoided as they usually will worsen precarious situations.

Echocardiography role in surgical septal myectomy

Obstructed patients who fail medical therapy, defined as lack of gradient reduction below 50 mmHg and persistent disabling symptoms, are usually offered invasive treatment: surgical septal myectomy, alcohol septal ablation, or DDD pacemaker. Surgical septal myectomy is the gold standard for obstructed patients refractory to treatment. It results in immediate relief of obstruction and improvement of mitral regurgitation. In specialized centers operative mortality is 1% and the rate of surgical success > 95% in those without comorbid cardiac or medical conditions. Postoperative resting gradients are abolished and parallel improvement in symptoms are achieved (5, 38-45).

Surgical intervention to relieve obstruction in HCM is technically challenging because in HCM multiple anatomical factors may play a role in gradient development and symptomatology. Key factors leading to SAM with mitral-septal contact are:

1. prominent septal bulge which directs the blood flow behind mitral valve coaptation (5, 32, 34),

2. large, slack mitral valve and anteriorly positioned coaptation plane (5, 10, 46-48),

3. anterior position and agglutination of the papillary muscles to the anterior left ventricular wall contributing to anterior position of coaptation plane (5, 49).

The surgeon may need to address all three anatomical abnormalities, which lead to a very crowded base of left ventricle and crucial overlap between the inflow and outflow portions of the left ventricle (5). McCully et al suggested, in a series of 47 patients who underwent septal myectomy alone, that asymmetric hypertrophy, severe systolic anterior motion of the mitral leaflet(s) on preoperative echocardiography can identify patients who are most likely to benefit from septal myectomy (50).

Technical difficulties are due especially to a very small and deep operative field offered by the aortotomy and small left ventricle chamber dimensions. Visualization is accessible only to the principal surgeon, and the anatomy of the empty heart can be ambiguous, leading to imprecision in the extent of myectomy that may result in either an inadequate small resection with persistent obstruction (51), or too large, and a ventricular septal defect (0% to 2%), or complete heart block (5, 38-45).

Preoperative TTE is a necessary guide for the surgeon in planning the operation. It gives the surgeon precise measurements on septum thickness and how deep he needs to go into the left ventricle to excise the midseptal bulge, as well as to evaluate the length and floppiness of the mitral valve leaflets, papillary muscle abnormalities and/or anomalous insertion (better evaluated by TEE). If the TTE imaging is inadequate transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is required. Important information is also provided by the TEE pre-bypass, as real-time measurements and assessment of the whole picture are evident. New unsuspected findings (patent foramen ovale, mitral valve prolapse and flail mitral valve leaflet, abnormal papillary muscles, etc) have been reported by Ommen et al in 17% of 256 patients undergoing septal myectomy. These findings resulted in an alteration of the surgical plan for 9% of the patients (5, 52, 53).

Persistent SAM, resting outflow gradient more than 30 mm Hg or more than 50 mmHg with provocation (intravenous inotropic agents or post-PVC), moderate to severe mitral regurgitation are indications for placing the patient back on heart-lung bypass for revision (5, 18, 54). Using these criteria 7 - 20% of the patients were found to need revision: either additional resection, or further mitral valve repair (5, 53, 54). In successful cases of extended septal myectomy, mitral valvuloplasty and papillary muscle release (Fig. 8), as seen in a R-P-R (resection--plication--release) operation described by Swistel (55), the post-surgical study will show: 1) a dramatic thinning of the septum, with widening of the left ventricular outflow tract to a width similar to that in the normal subjects, 2) resolution of systolic anterior motion and the left ventricular outflow tract gradient, 3) marked reduction or abolition of mitral regurgitation, 4) decreased anterior mitral leaflet length and 5) more posterior mitral leaflet coaptation point (5, 53, 55).

[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]

Late recurrent obstruction can be rarely encountered. Minakata et al reported 13 patients needing repeat myectomy in a series of 610 patients after classic myectomy operations, which included 7 patients from outside institutions. Mechanisms included too limited myectomy at the initial operation, mid-ventricular obstruction, unrecognized anomalies of papillary muscles, and ventricular remodeling (especially in pediatric patients) (56). Repeat myectomy can be performed with excellent outcomes. Need for re-operation may be reduced with current surgical approaches that include a more extended resection of the mid-ventricular septum, relief of papillary muscle anomalies, mitral valve plication, and routine use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (5, 56).

Echocardiography in DDD pacemaker treatment of HCM

Historically the next intervention that was applied to reduce LVOT obstruction was DDD pacing with atrioventricular (AV) delay (57-59). Though pacing cannot be considered a primary strategy to treat obstruction it appears useful in certain patients. The mechanism of the therapeutic effect derived from pacing is unclear. It is proposed that the initiation of the electrical impulse in the apex of the right ventricle alters the LV systolic contraction sequence leading to a reduction in the outflow gradient (57). Echocardiography has been an important technique in the evaluation and follow-up of response to this intervention. Fananapazir in a study of 44 patients with obstructive HCM showed that implantation of a DDD pacemaker improved symptoms and was associated with significant reduction in LVOT gradient (59). M-mode in the parasternal long axis and Doppler measurements (continuous or pulsed wave) of the LVOT in apical 3 or 5 chamber views were used to demonstrate the response to pacing with reduction in SAM and LVOT velocity. The response was simultaneous with the start of atrioventricular pacing (59) (Fig. 9). Doppler considerations may aid selecting optimal AV delay (60).

[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]

Initial observational findings of relief of symptoms, reduction of the gradient and LV remodeling (61, 62) have not been reproduced in randomized clinical trials (63, 64). These showed a large placebo effect and no significant improvement in objective measures of exercise capacity, and incomplete gradient reduction (30 to 50 mm Hg average residual gradient after pacing) (63, 64). Failure to relieve symptoms is common, with fewer than 40 % of patients still having improved symptoms at five years follow-up (57, 65). Also pacing may be detrimental to diastolic function (60).

Two particular groups of population had been shown to have a good long term clinical response to DDD pacemaker: elderly patients [greater than or equal to] 65 years of age (64), and patients with normal septal curvature and preserved elliptical LV cavity shape (66). Knowing that degree of improvement is less than that achieved with the other therapies dual-chamber pacing should be limited to elderly patients ([greater than or equal to] 70 years of age), those with significant co morbidities preventing them from having other therapies, those who require pacing for bradycardia, or who receive devices for sudden death prevention (37).

Role of echocardiography in alcohol septal ablation

For patients with refractory symptoms and high gradients on medication and not suitable for surgery because of comorbidities, percutaneous septal reduction via alcohol septal ablation (ASA) is an alternative therapy for relief of obstruction and improvement of symptoms. Absolute ethanol is infused into a septal branch of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) to specifically induce necrosis of the hypertrophied septum (67). The technique has a periprocedural mortality of 1-2%, lower in experienced centers (68-70). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy experts in the United States have expressed reservation about alcohol septal ablation because procedural complications occur at least as frequently as in surgical septal myectomy and long term results have not been yet been reported.

Alcohol septal ablation is a viable alternative to surgery in patients considered as high risk for surgery. Irreversible complete heart block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation occurs in 7-18% of the patients (68, 71). Also of concern is the scar that can be a substrate for late increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Alcohol septal ablation should therefore not be done in young patients < 40 years.

Echocardiography is a valuable tool to choose the site of ablation, as well as for evaluation of results. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) guides the targeted delivery of ethanol during ASA: there is a relation between the MCE risk area and infarct size determined by enzymatic and radionuclide methods (72,73). This technique to guide ASA was implemented in late 1990's in Europe by Faber and Seggewiss and in the US by Lakkis and Nagueh. Lakkis et al described their technique in 33 patients (72). After completion of initial angiography a balloon catheter is introduced into the first large septal perforator and inflated. With the balloon inflated echocardiography contrast is injected through the balloon lumen to delineate the area supplied by the septal branch, to assure that contrast does not go to the LV apex or lateral wall, papillary muscles, RV free wall or any other place not wanted (72) (Figures 10, 11). In the US dilute Definity is used; in Europe Levovist. Intra-procedural MCE guidance leads to a changes in interventional strategy in 15-20% patients; in 7-11% bubbles are seen distant from the expected septal target region is detected, leading to a target vessel change (68, 74). In 5-7% the procedure is aborted due inappropriate target vessel and patients are referred for surgery (68).

[FIGURES 10-11 OMITTED]

Depending on the septal artery size and the septal thickness, 1-3 mL of absolute ethanol is slowly instilled through the lumen of the inflated balloon catheter and left in place for 5 minutes. After balloon deflation and removal, angiography is performed to confirm the patency of the LAD and the occlusion of the target septal branch. Some groups will inject other septal branches during the same sitting if deemed necessary (72). Introduction of MCE as guidance in choosing the accurate septal branch was associated with a more targeted alcohol injection and a higher percentage of short (92% vs. 70%) (75), mid term (88%) (76) and 1 year success rate (99%) (69). In patients treated before the introduction of intraprocedural myocardial contrast echocardiography the main reason for unsatisfactory gradient reduction was suboptimal scar placement (74, 77).

Echocardiography offers insights into the mechanisms of benefit of ASA. It induces an acute decrease in septal thickening and decrease in acceleration of LV ejection (73). This translates into decrease in drag forces. Also, electromechanical changes after ASA with the development of bundle branch block (right bundle branch block alone in 60% and with left anterior hemiblock in 20%) lead to further inhomogeneity in LV contraction (78). There are no acute geometric changes, no immediate effect on the mitral valve apparatus (79).

On the follow up echocardiography basal septal thickness decreases significantly, with decreased systolic excursion. Decreased acceleration persists acting in synergy with the decreased septal thickness (72, 79). The angle between ventricular flow and mitral valve leaflets decreases. Mitral regurgitation improvement parallels the improvement in LVOT obstruction. After six weeks, LVOT diameter and the distance between anterior mitral leaflet and the septum were greater in comparison to baseline. Further benefits beyond the acute response from ASA can be explained by LV remodeling (69).

References

(1.) Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Kurosaki TT, Bild DE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults. Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA Study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults. Circulation 1995;92:785-9.

(2.) Abegaz B. The impact of echocardiography in the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. East Afr Med J 1990;67:556-67.

(3.) DeMaria AN, Bommer W, Lee G, Mason DT. Value and limitations of two dimensional echocardiography in assessment of cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1980;46:1224-31.

(4.) Maron BJ, Peterson EE, Maron MS, Peterson JE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in an outpatient population referred for echocardiographic study. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:577-80.

(5.) Sherrid MV, Chaudhry FA, Swistel DG. Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: echocardiography, pathophysiology, and the continuing evolution of surgery for obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:620-32.

(6.) Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Primary cardiomyopathies: classification, pathophysiology, clinical recognition and management. Cardiovasc Clin 1980;10:199-230.

(7.) Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ, Reeder GS, Seward JB. Evaluation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by Doppler color flow imaging: initial observations. Mayo Clin Proc 1986;61:631-9.

(8.) Feigenbaum H, Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Feigenbaums Echocardiography. 6th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

(9.) Maron BJ, Gottdiener JS, Perry LW. Specificity of systolic anterior motion of anterior mitral leaflet for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Prevalence in large population of patients with other cardiac diseases. Br Heart J 1981;45:206-12.

(10.) Henry WL, Clark CE, Griffith JM, Epstein SE. Mechanism of left ventricular outflow obstruction in patients with obstructive asymmetric septal hypertrophy (idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis). Am J Cardiol 1975;35:337-45.

(11.) Klues HG, Roberts WC, Maron BJ. Morphological determinants of echocardiographic patterns of mitral valve systolic anterior motion in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1993;87:1570-9.

(12.) Klues HG, Roberts WC, Maron BJ. Anomalous insertion of papillary muscle directly into anterior mitral leaflet in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Significance in producing left ventricular outflow obstruction. Circulation 1991;84:1188-97.

(13.) Maron BJ, Nishimura RA, Danielson GK. Pitfalls in clinical recognition and a novel operative approach for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with severe outflow obstruction due to anomalous papillary muscle. Circulation 1998;98:2505-8.

(14.) Gregor P, Widimsky P, Cervenka V, Sladkova T, Visek V. Distribution of hypertrophy in obstructive and non-obstructive types of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cor Vasa 1984;26:275-80.

(15.) Kuhn H, Gietzen F, Mercier J, Losse B, Kohler E, Schulte HD, et al. [Clinical aspects, course and prognosis of various forms of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy]. Z Kardiol 1983;72:83-98.

(16.) Romero-Farina G, Candell-Riera J, Pereztol-Valdes O, Galve-Basilio E, Palet-Balart J, Garcia Del Castillo H, et al. [Morphologic classification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with myocardial single photon emission tomography. Comparison with echocardiographic classification]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2000;53:511-6.

(17.) Kuhn H, Mercier J, Kohler E, Frenzel H, Hort W, Loogen F. Differential diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathies: typical (subaortic) hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, atypical (mid-ventricular) hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 1983;4 Suppl F:93-104.

(18.) Schulte HD, Bircks W, Korfer R, Kuhn H. Surgical aspects of typical subaortic and atypical midventricular hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;29:375-80.

(19.) Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287:1308-20.

(20.) Marwick TH, Nakatani S, Haluska B, Thomas JD, Lever HM. Provocation of latent left ventricular outflow tract gradients with amyl nitrite and exercise in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:805-9.

(21.) Panza JA, Petrone RK, Fananapazir L, Maron BJ. Utility of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography in the noninvasive assessment of left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:91-9.

(22.) Levene DL, Naqvi SZ, Shane SJ. Standing Valsalva maneuver in idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis. Can Med Assoc J 1978;118:683-4.

(23.) Faber L, Klempt HW, Dumitriu M. [The provocation of dynamic obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract in secondary myocardial hypertrophy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1991;116:1417-23.

(24.) Faber L, Heemann A, Surig M, Michalowski Z, Gleichmann U, Klempt HW. Outflow acceleration assessed by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography in left ventricular hypertrophy: an analysis of 103 consecutive cases. Cardiology 1998;90:220-6.

(25.) Gilligan DM, Chan WL, Ang EL, Oakley CM. Effects of a meal on hemodynamic function at rest and during exercise in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:429-36.

(26.) Dittrich H, Henneke KH, Pohlmann M, Pongratz G, Bachmann K. Provocation of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Comparison of orthostasis testing and nitrate application. Int J Card Imaging 1996;12:249-55.

(27.) Piccininno M, Spirito P. [Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sudden death]. Recenti Prog Med 2001;92:205-8.

(28.) Wigle ED, Rakowski H, Kimball BP, Williams WG. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Clinical spectrum and treatment. Circulation 1995;92:1680-92.

(29.) Spirito P, Seidman CE, McKenna WJ, Maron BJ. The management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 1997;336:775-85.

(30.) Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Lancet 1997;350:127-33.

(31.) Spirito P, Bellone P, Harris KM, Bernabo P, Bruzzi P, Maron BJ. Magnitude of left ventricular hypertrophy and risk of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1778-85.

(32.) Sherrid MV, Chu CK, Delia E, Mogtader A, Dwyer EM, Jr. An echocardiographic study of the fluid mechanics of obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:816-25.

(33.) Sherrid MV, Pearle G, Gunsburg DZ. Mechanism of benefit of negative inotropes in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1998;97:41-7.

(34.) Sherrid MV, Gunsburg DZ, Moldenhauer S, Pearle G. Systolic anterior motion begins at low left ventricular outflow tract velocity in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1344-54.

(35.) Sherrid MV, Barac I, McKenna WJ, Elliott PM, Dickie S, Chojnowska L, et al. Multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of disopyramide in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1251-8.

(36.) Sherrid M BI. Pharmacologic treatment of symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Maron B, ed. Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. London: Blackwell-Futura; 2004: p.200-19.

(37.) Sherrid MV. Dynamic left ventricular outflow obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy revisited: significance, pathogenesis, and treatment. Cardiol Rev 1998;6:135-45.

(38.) McIntosh CL, Maron BJ. Current operative treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1988;78:487-95.

(39.) Williams WG, Wigle ED, Rakowski H, Smallhorn J, LeBlanc J, Trusler GA. Results of surgery for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1987;76:V104-8.

(40.) ten Berg JM, Suttorp MJ, Knaepen PJ, Ernst SM, Vermeulen FE, Jaarsma W. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Initial results and long-term follow-up after Morrow septal myectomy. Circulation 1994;90:1781-5.

(41.) McCully RB, Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ, Schaff HV, Danielson GK. Extent of clinical improvement after surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1996;94:467-71.

(42.) Schulte HD, Borisov K, Gams E, Gramsch-Zabel H, Losse B, Schwartzkopff B. Management of symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy--long-term results after surgical therapy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;47:213-8.

(43.) Robbins RC, Stinson EB. Long-term results of left ventricular myotomy and myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:586-94.

(44.) Heric B, Lytle BW, Miller DP, Rosenkranz ER, Lever HM, Cosgrove DM. Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Early and late results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:195-206.45. Schoendube FA, Klues HG, Reith S, Flachskampf FA, Hanrath P, Messmer BJ. Long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up after surgical correction of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with extended myectomy and reconstruction of the subvalvular mitral apparatus. Circulation 1995;92 (9 Suppl):II122-7.

(46.) Reis RL, Bolton MR, King JF, Pugh DM, Dunn MI, Mason DT. Anterior-superior displacement of papillary muscles producing obstruction and mitral regurgitation in idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis. Operative relief by posterior-superior realignment of papillary muscles following ventricular septal myectomy. Circulation 1974;50 (2 Suppl):II181-8.

(47.) Shah PM, Taylor RD, Wong M. Abnormal mitral valve coaptation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: proposed role in systolic anterior motion of mitral valve. Am J Cardiol 1981;48:258-62.

(48.) Klues HG, Maron BJ, Dollar AL, Roberts WC. Diversity of structural mitral valve alterations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1992;85:1651-60.

(49.) Jiang L, Levine RA, King ME, Weyman AE. An integrated mechanism for systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on echocardiographic observations. Am Heart J 1987;113:633-44.

(50.) McCully RB, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Tajik AJ. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: preoperative echocardiographic predictors of outcome after septal myectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1491-6.

(51.) Roberts CS, McIntosh CL, Brown PS, Jr., Cannon RO, 3rd, Gertz SD, Clark RE. Reoperation for persistent outflow obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;51:455-60.

(52.) Ommen SR, Park SH, Click RL, Freeman WK, Schaff HV, Tajik AJ. Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in the surgical management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1022-4.

(53.) Grigg LE, Wigle ED, Williams WG, Daniel LB, Rakowski H. Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: clarification of pathophysiology and importance in intraoperative decision making. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:42-52.

(54.) Marwick TH, Stewart WJ, Lever HM, Lytle BW, Rosenkranz ER, Duffy CI, et al. Benefits of intraoperative echocardiography in the surgical management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1066-72.

(55.) Balaram SK, Sherrid MV, Derose JJ, Jr., Hillel Z, Winson G, Swistel DG. Beyond extended myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the resection-plication-release (RPR) repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:217-23.

(56.) Minakata K, Dearani JA, Schaff HV, O'Leary PW, Ommen SR, Danielson GK. Mechanisms for recurrent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after septal myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:851-6.

(57.) Nishimura RA, Holmes DR, Jr. Clinical practice. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1320-7.

(58.) Jeanrenaud X, Goy JJ, Kappenberger L. Effects of dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Lancet 1992;339:1318-23.

(59.) Fananapazir L, Cannon RO, 3rd, Tripodi D, Panza JA. Impact of dual-chamber permanent pacing in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with symptoms refractory to verapamil and beta-adrenergic blocker therapy. Circulation 1992;85:2149-61.

(60.) Nishimura RA, Hayes DL, Ilstrup DM, Holmes DR, Jr., Tajik AJ. Effect of dual-chamber pacing on systolic and diastolic function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Acute Doppler echocardiographic and catheterization hemodynamic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:421-30.

(61.) Fananapazir L, Epstein ND, Curiel RV, Panza JA, Tripodi D, McAreavey D. Long-term results of dual-chamber (DDD) pacing in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Evidence for progressive symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement and reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1994;90:2731-42.

(62.) Sakai Y, Kawakami Y, Hirota Y, Ito T, Shimada S, Tokaji Y, et al. Dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a comparison of acute and chronic effects. Jpn Circ J 1999;63:971-5.

(63.) Nishimura RA, Trusty JM, Hayes DL, Ilstrup DM, Larson DR, Hayes SN, et al. Dual-chamber pacing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:435-41.

(64.) Maron BJ, Nishimura RA, McKenna WJ, Rakowski H, Josephson ME, Kieval RS. Assessment of permanent dual-chamber pacing as a treatment for drug-refractory symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A randomized, double-blind, crossover study (M-PATHY). Circulation 1999;99:2927-33.

(65.) Nishimura RA, Symanski JD, Hurrell DG, Trusty JM, Hayes DL, Tajik AJ. Dual-chamber pacing for cardiomyopathies: a 1996 clinical perspective. Mayo Clin Proc 1996;71:1077-87.

(66.) Dimitrow PP, Podolec P, Grodecki J, Plazak W, Dudek D, Pieniazek P, et al. Comparison of dual-chamber pacing with nonsurgical septal reduction effect in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2004;94:31-4.

(67.) Sigwart U. Non-surgical myocardial reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Lancet 1995;346:211-4.

(68.) Faber L, Seggewiss H, Welge D, Fassbender D, Schmidt HK, Gleichmann U, et al. Echocardiography-guided percutaneous septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: 7 years of experience. Eur J Echocardiogr 2004;5:347-55.

(69.) Seggewiss H, Faber L, Ziemssen P, Gleichmann U. [One-year follow-up after echocardiographically-guided percutaneous septal ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2001;126:424-30.

(70.) Faber L, Meissner A, Ziemssen P, Seggewiss H. Percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: long- term follow up of the first series of 25 patients. Heart 2000;83:326-31.

(71.) Chang SM, Nagueh SF, Spencer WH, 3rd, Lakkis NM. Complete heart block: determinants and clinical impact in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy undergoing nonsurgical septal reduction therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:296-300.

(72.) Lakkis NM, Nagueh SF, Kleiman NS, Killip D, He ZX, Verani MS, et al. Echocardiography-guided ethanol septal reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1998;98:1750-5.

(73.) Nagueh SF, Lakkis NM, He ZX, Middleton KJ, Killip D, Zoghbi WA, et al. Role of myocardial contrast echocardiography during nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:225-9.

(74.) Faber L, Ziemssen P, Seggewiss H. Targeting percutaneous transluminal septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy by intraprocedural echocardiographic monitoring. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;13:1074-9.

(75.) Faber L, Seggewiss H, Fassbender D, Bogunovic N, Strick S, Schmidt HK, et al. [Percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: acute results in 66 patients with reference to myocardial contrast echocardiography]. Z Kardiol 1998;87:191-201.

(76.) Faber L, Seggewiss H, Gietzen FH, Kuhn H, Boekstegers P, Neuhaus L, et al. Catheter-based septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: follow-up results of the TASH-registry of the German Cardiac Society. Z Kardiol 2005;94:516-23.

(77.) Chang SM, Lakkis NM, Franklin J, Spencer WH, 3rd, Nagueh SF. Predictors of outcome after alcohol septal ablation therapy in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2004;109:824-7.

(78.) Henein MY, O'Sullivan CA, Ramzy IS, Sigwart U, Gibson DG. Electromechanical left ventricular behavior after nonsurgical septal reduction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1117-22.

(79.) Flores-Ramirez R, Lakkis NM, Middleton KJ, Killip D, Spencer WH, 3rd, Nagueh SF. Echocardiographic insights into the mechanisms of relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:208-14.

Dan Musat, Mark V. Sherrid

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Program and Echocardiography Laboratory, Division of Cardiology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, NY, USA

Address for Correspondence: Mark V. Sherrid, MD, Professor, Clinical Medicine, 1000 10th Avenue, New York City, NY 10019 USA E-mail: msherrid@chpnet.org

Presented in part at "Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Treatment: Medical, Surgical, Sudden Death Prevention and Newer Modalities" sponsored by St. Luke's--Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City. December 2005.
Figure 1. Relation between maximal left-ventricular-wall thickness and
the risk of sudden death in 480 patients with hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy. The incidence of sudden death increased progressively
and in direct relation to maximal wall thickness (P=0.001 by the
Chi-square test for trend) (31)

Maximal Left-Ventricular-Wall
Thickness (mm)

15 0
16-19 2.6
20-24 7.4
25-29 11.0
30 18.2

(Reproduced from Spirito P, Bellone P, Harris KM, Bernabo P, Bruzzi P,
Maron BJ. Magnitude of left ventricular hypertrophy and risk of sudden
death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1778-85 :
Copyright [c] 2000 with permission of Massachusetts Medical Society).
COPYRIGHT 2006 Galenos Yayincilik
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Musat, Dan; Sherrid, Mark V.
Publication:The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology (Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi)
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2006
Words:6304
Previous Article:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: through a window of 50 years/Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopati: 50 yillik pencereden bir bakis.
Next Article:Selection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients for myectomy or alcohol septal ablation/Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopatide miyektomi veya alkol septal...
Topics:


Related Articles
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with massive midventricular hypertrophy, midventricular obstruction and an akinetic apical chamber/Akinetik apikal...
Selection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients for myectomy or alcohol septal ablation/Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopatide miyektomi veya alkol septal...
Resection, plication, release--the RPR procedure for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy/Obstruktif hipertrofik kardiyomiyopati icin RPR...
Long-term prognosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after surgery/Cerrahi sonrasi hipertrofik kardiyomiyopatinin uzun donem prognozu.
Atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: mechanisms, embolic risk and prognosis/ Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopatide atriyal fibrilasyon:...
Treatment of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy/ Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopatide atriyal fibrilasyonun tedavisi.
Pacing in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a therapeutic option?/Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopatide pacing: Terapotik opsiyon mu?
Emotional and psychiatric issues in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and other cardiac patients/Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopatili ve diger kardiyak hastalarda...
Pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy determines its medical treatment/Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopatide patofizyoloji medikal tedaviyi belirler.
Syncopal episodes due to inappropriate peripheral vascular response in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy / Hipertrofik kardiyomiyopatili...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters