Printer Friendly

Earthquakes: how big will they get?

When seismologists want to assess the threat of large earthquakes, they often use the number of small tremors as a guide. But a new analysis of past jolts suggests this practice overestimates the risk of big shocks.

Scientists have long thought that the size and frequency of earthquakes are linked together by a rule, which holds that magnitude 4 quakes occur in a given region roughly 10 times as often as magnitude 5 quakes and 1,000 times as often as magnitude 7 quakes. Using this relationship, seismologists assumed they could estimate the hazard of major earthquakes from the number of smaller quakes in a region.

Researchers at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., decided to test this rule by analyzing a revised catalog of the earthquakes that have occurred around the world this century. In the Jan. 2 NATURE, Javier F. Pacheco, Christopher H. Scholz and Lynn R. Sykes report that larger quakes do not follow the patterns set by smaller ones. Shocks above magnitude 6 or so occur less frequently than the number of smaller tremors would suggest.

The researchers propose that this discrepancy stems from a difference in the way large and small tremors grow. Earthquakes occur only in the upper portion of the crust, where rock is brittle enough to fracture. Rock lying below that level is too hot and ductile. When a large earthquake starts, the fracture may spread horizontally for hundreds of kilometers, but the same crack can move only a few tens of kilometers, downward before it hits the ductile zone. In weak earthquakes, however, the fault fracture remains small, so it can spread equally in the vertical and horizontal directions.
COPYRIGHT 1992 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Science News
Date:Jan 18, 1992
Previous Article:Practice what you preach.
Next Article:Quake shakes nuclear-waste space.

Related Articles
Unearthing the earth's history.
Apple SOS: New York and the 'big one'?
Quakes pose greater threat to Bay Area.
Landers earthquake provides prediction clue.
Where have all the earthquakes gone? Scientists wonder why part of Hawaii's Kilauea volcano has gone quiet.
Quake up call.
Earthquakes: the first critical moments.
Balancing California's quake budget.
Southern California: dearth of quakes?
A great quake coming?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters