Printer Friendly


Byline: Shumaila Khurshid, Qaisara Parveen, Saba Khurshid and Rao Khalid Parvaiz

ABSTRACT: The present study was meant to discover the impacts of various level of aggression on students' academic performance. The target population of the study was involved all Govt. colleges for Women of city Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The study was delimited to students studying in grade12 and their instructors. Sample students were chosen through simple random sampling technique. For data collection, two questionnaires were utilized. Perry Aggression Questionnaire (1992) was used for measuring the distinctive level of aggression, whereas in order to discover the impacts of aggression on understudy's academic performance "Academic Performance Rating Scale" (APRS) for instructors was administered to take educators' responses about students' performance and academic record was additionally taken out from concerned institutions. Chi-square was applied for data analysis.

Result demonstrated negative impact of aggression on students' academic performance while there is a centrality contrast between the academic performance of the students having low, medium and high state aggression on students.

Keywords: Different, studying, aggression, administered, respective.


Aggressive conduct is portrayed as any "intentional exhibit to hurt others, physically or mentally" [1]. While, ""aggression"" is every now and again used then again with ""brutality,"" the last term implies more real view joint endeavors of others, along these lines there is a broad impact of associations of nature and quality with partners and instructors on students' sentiment belongingness and academic execution. Besides, Sense of belongingness is associated with academic motivation, and adjustment awesome sorts of behavior. Learning happens with the purpose of Aggression is any behavior proposed to hurt some individual, either physically or verbally. Snarls, berates, and manhandle are essentially more typical than shootings or first fights, however, aggression of any kind can be perilous. Intense students experience issues keeping up family relationships and are at extended threat for partaking in delinquent activities [2].

Forceful inclinations cause issues both in school and in later life [3]. The explanations behind mighty direct are confusing, with both genetic qualities and nature expecting parts. The reasons for forceful conduct are unpredictable, with both hereditary qualities and the earth assuming parts.

Bullies frequently originate from homes where guardians are dictator, threatening, and dismissing, and forceful conduct is both demonstrated and fortified [4, 5]. Their folks much of the time have poor critical thinking abilities and frequently advocate battling as an answer for clashes. These home situations can bring about unfriendly attributional predisposition, an inclination to view others' practices as antagonistic or forceful. Aggression is additionally connected to shortages in context taking, compassion, moral advancement, and enthusiastic self-control [6].

A proportional relationship existed between academic performance and behavior. Accomplishment issues can surface when students don't set objectives, don't arrange for how to contact them, and don't sufficiently screen their advancement toward the objectives. They likewise can emerge when students are low achievers and have low desires for achievement, attempt to ensure their self-esteem by staying away from disappointment, tarry, are sticklers, gotten to be overpowered by uneasiness, or get to be uninterested or estranged from school. A large number of these hindrances to accomplishment surface amid grade school and afterward turn out to be more declared amid center school or secondary school. Low academic performance generally prompts the aggression at school level. At some point to wind up prevalent each other's, students show forceful conduct.

Forceful conduct of a man has ability to harm and harm to the objective individual or articles, for example, physical attack, tossing objects, property demolition and verbal dangers and so forth. Human's forceful conduct is regularly identified with rivalry. Learning process makes troublesome by students conduct which lessening students' academic performance and self-idea for quite a while [7].

Objectives of the study are as follows.

1. To measure the different level of aggression and academic performance of 12 grade students.

2. To identify the effects of low, medium and high level of aggression on understudies' scholarly Performance.


In any case, current writing on indignation and aggression recommends "that the field go past demonstrative classifications and incorporate a scope of other imperative individual, bunch, and social qualities" [8]. Henceforth, while savage acts have turned into a noteworthy theme of worry in the overall population, they are generally uncommon. It is low-level forceful conduct that really catches our consideration at present, since it is more regular and disturbing in ordinary life, and like never before, we know about the enduring impact of gentle aggression on both casualties [9] and culprits [10]. In this manner, when the present writing gives an account of the rates of aggression, it alludes to an extensive variety of acts from serious physical aggression and savagery to such gentle practices as pushing and kicking, and to verbal aggression, including affront and ridiculing.

Different prominent psychological and social problems, including conduct problems, anxiety, and delinquency are associated with aggression [11]. Bucher and Manning [12] asserts that Aggression may include unacceptable social actions, including gang violence, bullying, threats, harassment, and harm, etc. In 2011 crimes of violence or aggression reported at 1,203,564 by the United States Department of Justice [13]. Reported rates of mellow and low-level school aggression are amazingly high. A few analysts show that consistently kid and each fourth young lady in school is included in physical clash [14], while others report significantly higher rates. For instance, Benbenishty and Astor [15] found that 20% of students persevered through extreme physical aggression, 60% experienced, mellow physical aggression, and the rates of verbal aggression were significantly higher (around 80%).

These discoveries recommend that, for some youngsters and youths, wellbeing in their surroundings (e.g., school, school transport, and play area) is a day by day concern [16; 17]. Whether aggression is available in the school or somewhere else, it abuses one of the essential needs of kids (and grownups) the requirement for wellbeing [18].

A forceful atmosphere meddles with the casualties' quick working in their academic and social life [19], and it markedly affects the kids' self-regard and social change at later stages [9]. Forceful conduct may influence engagement and adapting by implication. As conduct influences an individual's discernments, it appears just as there would be a considerable impact on a man's academic performance. A late metaanalysis of 33 studies uncovered a little, however noteworthy connection between companion exploitation and lower academic accomplishment [20]. Taylor, Davis, and Malanchuk [7] watched how an understudy's self-idea, self-regard, and levels of aggression influenced their performance in school. From their information, there gives off an impression of being a relationship amongst aggression and academic self-idea; youngsters without disguising academic objectives don't work out quite as well in school as the individuals who make interior inspiration.

Loveland et al., [21] discredit the idea that utilizing aggression has a positive result. Their information inferred that larger amounts of aggression may contrarily affect academic performance as it prompts non-attendance when students can't adapt to the stressors of school life. School savagery is hard to characterize. It can incorporate anything from low-level aggression and tormenting to manslaughter. Most would likely consider savagery to be the aftereffect of a physical encounter, be that as it may, particularly in the school setting, verbal misuse can be pretty much as harming to the casualties [22].

Notwithstanding interior elements, outer elements seem to affect how a youngster performs in an academic setting. One study specifically, set that forceful conduct permits students to "expand their social remaining among companions" by being seen as "well known" [23].They suggested that this sort of prize based forceful conduct has a tendency to be more self-damaging than valuable. Guardians and instructors may likewise affect an understudy's academic performance as they utilize their legitimate positions to control a tyke's conduct to fit their desires [24]. This study offers that extraneous inspiration from companions and individuals fit as a fiddle an individual's conduct, and that inspiration may not be constrained to characteristic objectives. Taylor, Davis and Malanchuk [7] investigated the effects of aggression on school performance found that possibility of aggression increased by low academic self-concept.

Learning difficulties affected by aggressive behavior which led to low academic self-concept. Loveland et al., [21] found that there is no positive outcome of aggression and investigated the negative impact of aggression on students' academic performance which leads to absenteeism. Low significant link hasbeen found in of 33 studies between lower academic success and peer discrimination [20]. Connor [16] also identified a strong relationship between aggression and academic failure.


The momentum exploration was descriptive in nature which was intended to examine the mental issue, for example, aggression of students at middle level and its sound impacts on their academic performance.


Sample of the present study was comprised of 700 female students (aged between 17-19), enrolled in twelve grade and their subject instructors (approximately 42 teachers). Sample was selected through simple random sampling technique.A List of the students was collected by the relevant class teachers. Name of the students were selected from the list randomly. Likewise, their teachers were selected to get their responses on the academic performance of the sampled students.


After a broad literature review with a specific end goal to discover the impacts of hostility on student's educational execution, two polls were utilized.

Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire [25] was used flexibly to measure the different level of aggression of students, which has been appearing to be legitimate and Reliable. This scale was comprised of 29 items. Item no. 9 and 16 were positively stated while rests of the items were negatively stated. Items were scored on a 5-point likert scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Long-term strategic application of abilities and information in various ways is required to perform well in academic settings. So to discover the impacts of aggression on pupils' school performance, "Academic Performance Rating Scale [26]" for instructors was utilized, for taking up instructor's reactions about understudy's performance. This scale was likewise utilized adaptably as beginning four requests were kept away from and instead of these request past academic record of tested students was taken up from particular organizations. Teachers addressed everything by utilizing 1 (never or poor) to 5 (frequently or phenomenal) Likert scale outline. Seven items in APRS (i.e., nos. 12, 13, 15, 19) were talk entered in scoring so that a higher total score contrasted and a positive academic status.

Pilot study for instruments acceptance and unwavering quality was led on a little specimen (50 understudies) of populace before information gathering. Troublesome things were identified and ambiguous and confused language was improved. Expert's opinion was looked for validating the instrument. After validating the reliability of final questionnaires was checked by test re test technique. The reliability of both questionnaires was found to be Cronbach's Alpha.86 and.76 respectively, which is considered to be quite suitable.

Data Procedure

Information was gathered by using survey technique.

Questionnaires were administered by the researcher in an organized way. After filling questionnaire by the students, APRS of those students were distributed among their subject teachers for taking up their responses about students' performance. Academic record of the same students was taken. Instructions were provided and guidelines were given to understudies and educators about poll for comprehension. Filled questionnaires and academic record was collected on the same day.

Data analysis

Scale items were scored after collection of data.

In aggression questionnaire, the responses to 2 positively stated items were scored as Strongly agree = 1 to Strongly disagree= 4.

Scoring ranges for high, medium and low level of aggression indicated as;

Low level score range is between: 8-30,

Moderate level score range is between: 31-60,

High level score range is between: 61-90

The responses to 27 negatively stated items were reversed and scored Strongly agree = 4 to Strongly disagree= 1.

Responses 0f positively stated items, in academic performance scale, were scored as Consistently poor, never, very slow, poor = 1 to More poor than successful, often, quickly, above average= 4

Whereas 5 points were given to Consistently successful, very often, very quickly, excellent.

The responses 0f negatively stated 0f items (8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) were scored as below: Never = 5 Rarely = 4

And the academic record of the same students was rated as,

0-49%, 50-60%, 70-79%, 80-89%, 90-100%

1 2 3 4 5


This area manages examination and translation of information as identifying with the point of the study, gathered and scored. To investigate the outcomes, SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences: Version 16.0) was utilized. The acquired scored were condensed independently by figuring their Descriptive Statistics and Chi-square was applied to discover the impacts of aggression on understudies' scholastic execution and to discover contrast between te scholarly execution of understudies having low, medium and abnormal state hostility. Results are arranged underneath.

Table: Chi Square Calculation of Aggression and Academic Performance

###Academic Performance###Pearson###Asymp.








Table 2 base on the effect of aggression on students' academic achievement. Table shows chi-square value is 5.725) at p=0.021, which is less than the significance value 0.05. It exposed negative effect of aggression on students' academic performance. Contingency Coefficient value is 0.09 which shows a positive but low relationship between aggression and academic achievement.

This table likewise demonstrates the relationship of aggression and academic performance of understudies. In the first place, line lets us know 1 student with low level of aggression shows low academic performance, 12 understudies with low level of aggression show normal academic performance and 3 understudies with low level of aggression exhibit high academic performance.

Second column of table 2 demonstrate that 20 understudies with medium level of aggression shows low academic performance, 347 understudies with medium level of aggression uncover average academic performance, 126 students with medium level of aggression show high academic performance.

Third column portrays 4 learners with low academic performance have abnormal state of aggression, 127 understudies with abnormal state of aggression show normal academic performance and 61 understudies uncover high academic performance with abnormal state of aggression.


In the light of measurable investigation and study's discoveries, the accompanying real conclusions were drawn:

1. The result demonstrated that the majority of students with mild and high level of aggression demonstrated average academic performance.

2. There is a negative impact of aggression on understudy's academic performance.

3. The result also exposed significant distinction between academic performance of learners having high, medium and low level aggression.


Academic performance is influenced by various variables including aggression which affects behavior. So present study was started to examine the effects of aggression on understudies' scholastic execution. Results revealed negative effect of aggression on students' educational performance. The result was supported by Uludag, [27] who identified a negative effect of aggression on student's academic achievement. Further findings revealed significant difference between the academic performances of the students' exhibit different level of aggression and majority of students having mild level of aggression showed average academic performance.

These finding found contradictory by Schwartz et al., [28] who conclude that highly aggressive adolescents exposed unexplained absences and low academic performance. It is recognized that hostility exists inside the instructive setting [29]. A longitudinal study conducted Chen et al., [30] in China, to investigate the contributions of aggression in academic achievement and social competency also found supportive to the current research. As the results showed indirect influence of aggression on academic and social consequences and found the contribution of Social competence and academic achievement on development. Findings also revealed 61 students with high level of aggression exposed high academic performance, which was supported by a study on aggression and academic achievement was conducted in Bangladesh by Rahman and Lailun [31] to explore gender differences and effects of aggression on academic achievement and residence. Significant effect gender was found on academic achievement.

Result showed that more aggression exposed by male than female and students with high grades showed more aggression. Boys of rural areas with high academic achievement were found to be more aggressive than boys in urban areas. And girls of rural areas with high academic achievement was found to be less aggressive than girls in urban areas.

As behavior influences an individual's cognitive abilities and their ability to perform well in different settings, it appears as if there would be a generous impact on a man's scholastic execution. Notwithstanding inward components, outside elements seem to affect how a tyke performs in a scholarly setting. Guardians and instructors may likewise affect an understudy's scholastic execution as they utilize their legitimate positions to control a tyke's conduct to fit their desires. Feeling furious is a piece of being human. The issue is not outrage itself but rather the outflow of indignation in hurtful ways. However we are not conceived knowing how to express outrage or irritation helpfully and peacefully; we need to take in the right aptitudes. In many social orders, it is decisively the general population who do not have those social abilities who are most inclined to vicious answers for issues seeing someone [32].

One approach to diminish aggression and increase performance, then, is to show individuals such strategies as how to convey indignation or feedback in valuable routes, how to arrange and bargain when clashes emerge, and how to apologize when they have to [33].

Keeping up a sheltered and supporting learning environment is key for understudies to believe each other and their educators. It is likewise vital that understudies feel safe so they can focus on their concentrates as opposed to their own wellbeing [34]. Lower levels of aggression between understudies, or the nature of their associations with companions, school staff, and on-grounds security work force might be more prescient of their sentiments of wellbeing than the genuine number of rough occasions [35]. In the event that understudies don't feel less protected when savage wrongdoing is high it is difficult to perceive how worries about physical wellbeing and impression of a perilous learning environment could be the main driver of decreases in accomplishment in brutal schools.


In the light of findings and conclusions, following recommendations are made.

1. Current research presented a negative effect of aggression on student's academic performance, so there is the need of the hour to manage programs for students' counseling, it will indirectly help students to improve their academic performance.

2. Wellbeing administration ought to be made inside the universities to mindful the understudies of the shocking impact of animosity on their lives.

3. The staff of the understudy wellbeing administration ought to be made completely mindful to the destructive impacts animosity for arranging diverse exercises about wellbeing training identified with understudies' issue.

4. The educators should be watchful for the unmistakably forceful understudies. Since they can judge understudies conduct in the classroom and perceive that their scholastic execution is enduring by their emotional well-being.


1. Moeller, T. Youth, aggression and violence. London: Erlbaum (2001)

2. Berger, K. S. Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review; 27(1), 91-92 (2007)

3. Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D. and Lynam, D. Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. In N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.) and D. William and R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 719-788). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley (2006)

4. Barry, C. M. and Wentzel, K. R. Friend influence on prosocial behavior: The role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 153-163 (2006)

5. Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., Dioone, G. and Perusse, D. Examining genetic and environmental effects on reactive versus proactive aggression. Dev Psychol.;42: 1299-1312 (2006)

6. Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F. and Nelson, D. A. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of peer maltreatment: Studies of relational victimization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(3), 98- 101 (2002)

7. Taylor, L. D., Davis, P. K. and Malanchuk, O. Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and aggression at school. Aggressive Behavior, 33(2), 130-136 (2007)

8. Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R. and DiGiuseppe, R. A. Principles of empirically supported interventions applied to anger management. The Counseling Psychologist, 30(2), 262-280 (2002)

9. Olweus, D. Bullying in school. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell (1993)

10. Farrington, D. P. Childhood, adolescent, and adult features of violent males. In L. D. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 215- 240). New York: Plenum Press (1994)

11. Marsee, M. A., Barry, C. T., Childs, K. K., Frick, P. J., Kimonis, E. R., Munoz, L. C., Aucoin, K. J., Fassnacht, G. M., Kunimatsu, M. M. and Lau, K. S. L. Assessing the forms and functions of aggression using self-report: Factor structure and invariance of the Peer Conflict Scale in youths. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 792-804 (2011)

12. Bucher, K. T. and Manning, M. L. Youth aggression and violence: Risk, resilience, and prevention. Clearing House, 76 (3), 160-164 (2003)

13. USDJ. Uniform crime report. Washington DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation (2012)

14. Horne, A. M., Stoddard, J. L. and Bell, C. D. A parent's guide to understanding and responding to bullying: The bully busters approach. Champaign, IL: Research Press (2008)

15. Benbenishty, R. and Astor, R. A. Monitoring indicators of children's victimization in school: Linking national-, regional-, and site-level indicators. Social Indicators, 84(3), 333-348 (2007)

16. Connor, D. F. Aggression and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press (2002)

17. Goldstein, A. P. Low-level aggression: First steps on the ladder to violence. Champaign, IL: Research Press (1999)

18. Maslow, B. Toward a psychology of being. New York: Wiley (1998)

19. Elias, M. J. and Arnold, H. (Eds.). The educator's guide to emotional intelligence and academic achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press (2006)

20. Nakamoto, J. and Schwartz, D. Is peer victimization associated with academic achievement? A meta-analytic review, Social Development, 19(2), 221-242 (2010)

21. Loveland, J. M., Lounsbury, J. W., Welsh, D. and Buboltz, W. C. The Validity of Physical Aggression in Predicting Adolescent Academic Performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 167-176 (2007)

22. Boxer, P., Edwards-Leeper, L., Goldstein, S. E., Musher-Eizenman, D. and Dubow, E. F. Exposure to "low-level" aggression in school: Associations with aggressive behavior, future expectations, and perceived safety.Violence and Victims, 18, 691-705 (2003)

23. Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H. J. and Rodkin, P. C. The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1699-1710 (2011)

24. Stipek, D. and S. Miles. Effects of Aggression on Achievement: Does Conflict With the Teacher Make It Worse? Child Development, 79(6), 1721-1735 (2008)

25. Connor, D. F. Aggression and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: Research and treatment. New York: The Guilford Press (2004)

26. Buss, A. H. and Perry, M. The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-259 (1992)

27. DuPaul, G. J. and Rapport, M. D. Teacher ratings of academic skills: The development of the academic performance rating scale. School Psychology Review, 20(2), 284-300 (1991)

28. Uludag. O. The Influence of Aggression on Students' Achievement: Evidence from Higher Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89(1), 954 - 958 (2013)

29. Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J. and McKay, T. Po-pularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116-1127 (2006)

30. Yaratan, H. and Uludag, O. The impact of verbal aggression on burnout: An empirical study on university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2), 41-46 (2012)

31. Chen, X., Huang, X., Chang, L., Wang, L. and Li, D. Aggression, social Competence, and Academic Achievement in Chinese Children: A 5-year Longitudinal Study. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 583-592 (2010)

32. Rahman, M. S. and Lailun, N. L. Aggression in Boys and Girls as Related to Their Academic Achievement and Residential Background. Psychology, Vol.4(5) 459-462 (2013)

33. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Misra, T. A., Selwyn, C. and Rohling, M. L. Rates of bi-directional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(1), 199-230 (2012)

34. Christensen, A., Doss, B. and Jacobson, N. S. Reconcilable differences (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press (2014)

35. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S. and Easton, J. Q. Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2010)

36. Steinberg, M.P., Allensworth, E. and Johnson, D.W. Student and teacher safety in Chicago Public Schools: The roles of community context and school social organization. Consortium on Chicago School Research (2011)
COPYRIGHT 2017 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Khurshid, Shumaila; Parveen, Qaisara; Khurshid, Saba; Parvaiz, Rao Khalid
Publication:Science International
Article Type:Report
Date:Apr 30, 2017

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters