Printer Friendly


Byline: M. Cinar, A. Ceyhan, O. Yilmaz and H. Erdem


The present study was performed to determine the effect of PGF2[alpha] and GnRH injections in different time intervals on fertility in Hair goats during breeding season. Totally, 80 primiparous Hair goats were divided into four groups (n=20 in each) according to the body condition scores of the animals. The animals in groups were treated as follows; first group (Ovsynch), GnRH on day 0, PGF2[alpha] on day 7 and GnRH on day 9; second group (2PG-G), PGF2[alpha] on day 0, PGF2[alpha] on day 7 and GnRH on day 9; third group (PG-G), PGF2[alpha] on day 7 and GnRH on day 9; fourth group (G), GnRH on day 9. Bucks were included into the groups on day 10-14 and insemination was performed during standing heat. Blood samples were collected to determine possible embryonic losses on day 21 for further analysis of serum progesterone concentrations. Transabdominal ultrasonography was performed to detect pregnancy on day 40-45.

It was determined that in Ovsynch, 2PG-G, PG-G and G groups, estrous rate was 100%, 95%, 95% and 85%; pregnancy rate was 85%, 95%, 95% and 85%; kidding rate was 100%, 78.9%, 94.7% and 88.2%; twinning rate was 41.2%, 40%, 22.2%, 20%; litter size was 1.41, 1.40, 1.22, 1.20, respectively. However, these parameters did not show any significant difference between groups (P> 0.05). In conclusion, it is suggested that all treatment procedures may be used for estrous synchronization in Hair goats during breeding season due to the satisfactory results.

Keywords: Goat, Fertility, Synchronization, Ovsynch, GnRH, PGF2[alpha].


Estrous synchronization can be managed by different programs including single or combined use of hormones such as progestagens, estrogens, melatonin, PGF2[alpha], PMSG, hCG, GnRH in breeding, transition or anestrous seasons in goats (Alaam, 2005; Titi et al., 2010; Alkan et al., 2012).

During breeding season, progesterone impregnated intra-vaginal sponge treatment combined with PMSG is commonly used (Holtz, 2005). However, the vaginitis is the expected side effect of intravaginal sponge treatment together with the vaginal discharge following the removal of the device (Ataman and Akoz, 2006). It has been reported that repeated progesterone/PMSG treatments may cause anti-PMSG antibody and hence, infertility (Baril et al., 1992; Roy et al., 1999; Redmer et al., 2000). The high concentrations of anti-PMSG antibody delay the standing heat and LH peak. Therefore, hCG and GnRH has been recently used as an alternative to PMSG (Alaam et al., 1999). On the other hand, adding GnRH injection(s) to progesterone based protocols improve the success of estrous synchronization programs but do not increase the fertility (Saribay et al., 2012).

The development of more practical and/or economic synchronization programs to minimalize the possible disadvantages of protocols in small ruminant breeding still maintains its importance for researchers and breeders (Holtz et al., 2008; Alkan et al., 2012).

Nowadays, the Ovsynch protocol improved for cattle breeding is began to be used in sheep and goat breeding (Deligiannis et al., 2005; Amiridis et al., 2006; Holtz et al., 2008; Ashmawy, 2011; Riaz et al., 2012) to synchronize the estrous and ovulation (Pursley et al., 1995).

First GnRH injection used in Ovsynch protocol initiates the release of FSH and LH from anterior pituitary. If the ovulation occurs following the first GnRH of Ovsynch, follicular wave emergence may be synchronized. A follicle on the ovary grows and becomes a dominant follicle and the progesterone concentration is decreased by regression corpus luteum after PGF2[alpha] on day 7. Follicular growth continues and preovulatory follicle grows. The second GnRH injection on day 9 re-initiates the realising of LH from pituitary and ovulation of preovulatory follicle is achieved 24-32 hours later. Therefore, timed artificial insemination can be performed 16-20 hours after this injection (Pursley et al., 1997; Geary et al., 1998; Stevenson et al., 1999).

In this study, the effect of PGF2[alpha] and GnRH injections performed at different time intervals on fertility parameters was evaluated during breeding season in Hair goats.


Experimental site: The study was conducted in Nigde province, Turkey (37deg 25' - 38deg 58' north latitude, 33deg 10' - 35deg 25' east longitude and 1229 m altitude) on October-December 2012 in Hair goats during breeding season. A total of 80 multiparous Hair goat aged between 2 and 4 years, weighing 35-45 kg and eight bucks aged between 2 and 5 which were used for mating were included to the study.

Housing and Feeding: During the experiments, animals were pastured in the daytime and housed in semi-opened barns. No additive feeding regimen was used for goats before or after mating, whereas bucks were fed by additive 1 kg/day/head barley meal. Clean water and licking block were administered ad libitum.

Groups and Treatment: Body condition scoring (BCS; 1 to 5) was recorded at the first day of experiments and the goats were divided into four groups (n = 20 in each) followed as Ovsynch (BCS, 1.87), 2PG-GH (BCS, 1.98), PG-GH (BCS, 1.85) and GH (BCS, 1.86) based on BCS. The goats were treated by the synchronization protocols as indicated in Table 1. The treatments were started regardless of the day of estrous cycle and the first day of the treatments was considered as Day 0.

Table 1. The synchronization protocol schedule applied to the goats in groups.

Groups###Day 0###Day 7###Day 9###Day 10-14







Observation of Standing Heat and Insemination: Standing heat was determined at early in the morning (06.00-07.00 am) and late in the evening (06.00-07.00 pm) by one hour observation using bucks. The bucks were separated from the goats until the end of protocols for mating and then allowed to mate on day 10-14 of experiment (for 5 days).

Blood Sampling and Ultrasonography: Blood samples of mated goats were collected into anticoagulant vacutainer tubes via jugular venepuncture 21 days after mating. Samples were transferred to laboratory at 4 degC and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Sera were transferred in Eppendorf tubes and were kept in a freezer at -20degC for later estimation of P4 concentrations. Serum P4 concentrations were determined by electrochemiluminiscence immunoassay (ECLIA) using a commercial test kit (Elecsys Progesterone II, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany) in an immunologic test analyser (cobas e 601, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany). Transabdominal ultrasonography (Pie Medical 100 Falco Vet Model 7.5 MHz probe, Netherlands) was performed to confirm pregnancy 40-45 days after mating.

Fertility Parameters: The parameters for standing heat, pregnancy, birth, single kidding, twinning and kid yields were calculated as described below.

Estrous rate; (number of standing heat/ number of synchronized goats) x 100

Pregnancy rate; (number of pregnant goat/number of synchronized goats) x 100

Kidding rate; (number of goat having birth/number of pregnant goats) x 100

Single kidding rate; (number of goat with single kid/ number of goat having birth) x 100

Twinning rate; (number of goat with twin kids/number of goat having birth) x 100

Litter size; number of kid born/number of goat having birth

Fecundity; number of kid born/number of goats synchronized

Statistical analysis: Chi-square test was conducted to analyse of fertility parameters, whereas BCS was evaluated by variance analyse. All statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software for windows (15.0).

Statistical significance was declared at P<0.05.


Fertility parameters obtained in groups are given at Table 2. Accordingly, the estrous (100%, 95%, 95% and 85%), pregnancy (85%, 95%, 95% and 85%), kidding (100%, 78.9%, 94.7% and 88.2%), twinning (41.2%, 40%, 22.2% and 20%) and litter size (1.41, 1.40, 1.22 and 1.20) rates between Ovsynch, 2PG-GH, PG-GH and GH groups did not show any significant difference.

Blood progesterone concentrations of Ovsynch, 2PG-GH, PG-GH and GH groups were 7.744, 7.631, 6,918 and 9.758 ng/ml, respectively. The progesterone concentrations detected 21 days after mating did not differ between groups. However, no embryonic loss was detected in groups, when the blood progesterone concentrations and transabdominal ultrasonography findings compared.

Table 2. Estrous, pregnancy, birth, single kidding, twinning and kid yield rates obtained in Ovsynch, 2PG-GH, PG-GH and GH groups.


Estrous rate (%)###100 (20/20)###95 (19/20)###95 (19/20)###85 (17/20)###0.317

Pregnancy rate (%)###85 (17/20)###95 (19/20)###95 (19/20)###85 (17/20)###0.565

Kidding rate (%)###100 (17/17)###78.9 (15/19)###94.7 (18/19)###88.2 (15/17)###0.640

Single kidding rate (%)###58.8 (10/17)###60 (9/15)###77.8 (14/18)###80 (12/15)###0.677

Twinning rate (%)###41.2 (7/17)###40 (6/15)###22.2 (4/18)###20 (3/15)###0.677

Litter size###1.41 (24/17)###1.40 (21/15)###1.22 (22/18)###1.20 (18/15)###0.377

Fecundity###1.20 (24/20)###1.05 (21/20)###1.10 (22/20)###0.90 (18/20)###0.501


It has been reported that Ovsynch protocol has promising results (Deligiannis et al., 2005; Amiridis et al., 2006) and a low cost protocol in sheep and goat (Ataman and Akoz, 2006). Ovsynch protocol can be used for synchronization of ovulations and for decreasing the lambing intervals in sheep during breeding season (Ashmawy, 2011; Ashmawy, 2012). Alnimer et al., (2005), reported that the combination of GnRH and PGF2[alpha] injections and double PGF2[alpha] injections 10 days interval had similar pregnancy rates in sheep during breeding season. In other study, it was stated that GnRH+PGF2[alpha] injections positively influenced the estrous and pregnancy rates in sheep synchronized by progesterone during anestrus season (Husein and Kridli, 2003). The combination of GnRH+PGF2[alpha] and PGF2[alpha]+PGF2[alpha] injections have 93.7% vs 86.6% estrous rate, 85.7% vs 84.6% pregnancy rate, 83.3% vs 81.8% kidding rate and 1.70 vs 1.66 kid yield in sheep during breeding season (Ataman and Akoz, 2006).

Majdi et al., (2014), reported that fertility parameters obtained in Nubian goats following the 11 days apart double intramuscular injections of 125 cloprostenol on days postpartum 45, 60 and 90 were low and the day of treatment did not show any significant difference.

In addition, pregnancy rates following artificial insemination in sheep synchronized by combination of GnRH+ PGF2[alpha] are 50%, whereas the pregnancy rate can be increased till 90-95% by natural mating (Deligiannis et al., 2005; Amiridis et al., 2006). It has been reported that P4+PGF+hCG is the best option to induce and synchronize estrous as well as ovulation regarding the administration of GnRH during the natural anestrus season in goats (Gonzlez-lvarez et al., 2016), Acar et al., (2013) reported that use of norgestomet implants and FGA sponges in combination with eCG and PGF2[alpha] were effective for estrous response, onset of estrous, fecundity, prolificacy and fertility in nulliparous Saanen does at an age of 7-9 months under local conditions at the end of the transition period.

It has been assumed that Ovsynch protocol is an alternative to vaginal sponge treatments, since the Ovsynch protocol as compared to vaginal sponge treatment has high results for kidding (58% vs 46%) and fecundity rates (1.86 vs 1.83) in goats during the breeding season (Holtz et al., 2008) Nur et al., (2013) found that progesterone based Co-synch vs Ovsynch protocols had 92% vs 84% estrous rate, 38% vs 24% pregnancy, kidding rates 1.4 vs 1.2, respectively in Saanen goats. The authors (Nur et al., 2013) also suggested that Co-synch model was more advantageous than Ovsynch protocol due to its low labour cost. Estrous rate as well as pregnancy and kidding rates obtained in this study were higher than those Nur et al., (2013) reported, whereas fecundity rates were similar.

Bowdridge et al.,(2013), observed that NCSynch-TA protocol (PGF injection on Day 1, GnRH injection on Day 7 and second PGF injection 7 days later and timed artificial insemination after 72 h) showed 88%, 53%, 51% for estrous, pregnancy and kidding rates, respectively in Boer and crossbreed-Boer goats during breeding season. It was seen that estrous, pregnancy and kidding rates detected in this study were higher than the results of Bowdridge et al., 2013. Titi et al.,(2010) reported that control, S (progesterone impregnated intravaginal sponge and eCG), GP (GnRH and PGF2[alpha]) and GSP (GnRH, progesterone impregnated intravaginal sponge and PGF2[alpha]) groups showed 50%, 87%, 73% and 87% for kidding rate and 1.8, 1.5, 1.9 and 2.0 for fecundity rate, respectively in Damascus goats and it was concluded that progesterone impregnated intravaginal sponge treatment combined with GnRH and PGF2[alpha] injections might improve the success of estrous synchronization and fertility.

Another study (Riaz et al., 2012) in which Ovsynch protocol and ten days apart double injection of PGF2[alpha] were compared in goats during breeding season has showed similar pregnancy rate (60% vs 78%) and fecundity rate (1.5 vs 1.7). Therefore, the authors assumed that Ovsynch protocol might be used instead of other protocols which based on the using of steroids (Riaz et al., 2012). In this study, estrous, pregnancy, kidding, twinning and litter size in Ovsynch group were 100%, 85.0%, 41.2% and 1.41, respectively. Pregnancy rate was higher than those reported by Holtz et al., (2008) and Riazet al., (2012), whereas mean litter size was lower. It is suggested that the discrepancies may be due to lower twinning rate of Hair goats.

Estrous, pregnancy, kidding, twinning and fecundity rates did not show any significant difference in 2PG-GH, PG-GH and GH groups. In this study, pregnancy rates observed in Ovsynch, 2PG-GH, PG-GH and GH groups were higher than those reported by Riaz et al., (2012), while fecundity was lower. It was found that estrous, pregnancy, kidding and fecundity rates were similar with other reports (Deligiannis et al., 2005; Amiridis et al., 2006; Ataman and Akoz, 2006). Discrepancies above may be caused by some factors such as genotype, housing and management. However, higher pregnancy rate in the combination of GnRH+PGF2[alpha] injections may be associated with the occurrence of GnRH induced ovulation (Deligiannis et al., 2005; Alkan et al., 2012).

It is known that luteal regression starts around the day 12-13 in non-pregnant goats and the concentrations of progesterone decrease, whereas pregnant goats display higher progesterone concentrations 5-8 ng/ml on average on day 13 (Homeida and Cooke, 1982). The injection of gonadorelin causes not only luteotrophic support but also prevents the luteolytic mechanism by decreasing of plasma estradiol 17[beta] concentration and hence prohibits the rapid decreased of progesterone (Alaam et al., 1999). It is suggested that the higher progesterone concentrations detected in pregnant goats might be due to the GnRH injections including in all groups.

Conclusion: Satisfactory synchronization and fertility parameters were obtained by using Ovsynch, 2PG-GH, PG-GH and GH protocols in Hair goats during breeding season. It is concluded that the using of Ovsynch and 2PG-GH protocols have more benefits to attain higher twinning rate and fecundity.


Acar, D.B., Birdane, M.K., Ozenc, E., Yeni, D., I. Dogan (2013). Effectiveness of Different Progesterone Analogues and GnRH on Reproductive Parameters in Nulliparous Saanen Goats at the End of the Transition Period. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 19 (Suppl-A): 181-186.

Alaam, E (2005). Obstetrics and Infertility in Domestic Animals (Ed. Alaam, E., 2005, Ankara).

Alaam, E., B.Gven, A.Ayarand, and E. Saban (1999). Effect of Gonadoreline Administration on Blood Progesterone, Oestradiol 17\ beta Concentration and Some Fertility Parameters in Angora Goats. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sciences 23: 77-82.

Alkan, S., G. Kasiki, . Cirit, .B.zdas, M.C. Gndz, M.Umak, and .T.Yilmaz (2012.)The Effect of Modified Ovsynch Protocol on Synchronization And Fertility Rate in Tahirova Ewes. J. Fac. Vet. Med. istanbul Univ. 38: 37-42.

Alnimer, M., Tabbaa, M.J., Amasheh, M., and H.Alzyoud (2005). Hormonal treatments and the ram effect on synchronised oestrus in Awassi ewes at the beginning of the breeding season. New Zealand J. Agricultural Research 48: 473-480.

Amiridis, G., Valasi, I., Menegatos, I., Rekkas, C., Goulas, P., Papanikolaou, T., and C. Deligiannis (2006). Luteal stage dependence of pituitary response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in cyclic dairy ewes subjected to synchronisation of ovulation. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 17: 769-774.

Ashmawy, T (2011). Timing Ovulation in Ewes Treated with Ovsynch Protocol by Different Times of PGF2[alpha]Injection during the Breeding Season. Iranian J. Applied Animal Science 1: 23-30.

Ashmawy, T.A. (2012): Effect of ovarian synchronization protocols, using GnRH and PGF2[alpha], on ovarian response and reproductive traits of Rahmani ewes. Egyptian J. Sheep and Goat Sciences 7: 43-49.

Ataman, R.M., andM. Akoz, (2006). GnRH-PGF 2a and PGF 2a-PGF 2a synchronization in Akkaraman cross-bred sheep in the breeding season. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 50.

Baril, G., Remy, B., Vallet, J., and J.F.Beckers(1992). Effect of Repeated Use of Progestagen-PMSG Treatment for Estrus Control in Dairy Goats out of Breeding Season. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 27: 161-168.

Bowdridge, E., Knox, W.B., Whisnant, C.S., and C.E.Farin (2013). NCSynch: A novel, progestagen-free protocol for ovulation synchronization and timed artificial insemination in goats. Small Ruminant Research 110: 42-45.

Deligiannis, C., Valasi, I., Rekkas, C., Goulas, P., Theodosiadou, E., Lainas, T., and G.Amiridis (2005). Synchronization of ovulation and fixed time intrauterine insemination in ewes. Reproduction in domestic animals 40: 6-10.

Geary, T., Whittier, J., Downing, E., LeFever, D., Silcox, R., Holland, M., Nett, T., and G. Niswender (1998).Pregnancy rates of postpartum beef cows that were synchronized using Syncro-Mate-B or the Ovsynch protocol. J. Anim. Science 76: 1523-1527.

Gonzlez-lvarez, V.H., Meza-Herrera, C.A., Leyva1, C., Alvarado-Espino, A.S., Guillen-Munoz, J.M., Rodrguez-Martnez, R., F.G. Veliz-Deras (2016). Effectiveness of different hCG and GnRH based protocols in progesterone primed goats on estrus induction and reproductive outcomes in out-off-season goats. J. Anim. Res. 6 (2): 177-182.

Holtz, W (2005). Recent developments in assisted reproduction in goats. Small Ruminant Research 60: 95-110.

Holtz, W., Sohnrey, B., Gerland, M., and M. A.Driancourt (2008). Ovsynch synchronization and fixed-time insemination in goats. Theriogenology 69: 785-792.

Homeida, A., and R.Cooke(1982). Peripheral plasma concentrations of 13, 14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F 2[alpha] and progesterone around luteolysis and during early pregnancy in the goat. Prostaglandins 24: 313-321.

Husein, M., and R.Kridli (2003). Effect of Progesterone Prior to GnRH-PGF2[alpha] Treatment on Induction of Oestrus and Pregnancy in Anoestrous Awassi Ewes. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 38: 228-232.

Majdi, E., Badawi, M.E., Makawi, S.A., Abdelghafar, R.M., M.T. Ibrahim (2014). Effect of Oestrous Synchronization using PGF2[alpha] on Subsequent Fertility of Nubian Goats (Capra hircus). SUST J. Agricultural Vet. Sciences 15 (2): 45-53.

Nur, Z., Nak, Y., Nak, D., stner, B., Tuna, B., Simsek, G., and H. Sagirkaya (2013). The use of progesterone-supplemented Co-synch and Ovsynch for estrus synchronization and fixed-time insemination in nulliparous Saanen goat. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 37: 183-188.

Pursley, J., Mee, M.,, and M., Wiltbank (1995). Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF 2[alpha] and GnRH. Theriogenology 44: 915-923.

Pursley, J., Wiltbank, M., Stevenson, J., Ottobre, J., Garverick, H., and L. Anderson (1997). Pregnancy rates per artificial insemination for cows and heifers inseminated at a synchronized ovulation or synchronized estrus. J. Dairy Science 80: 295-300.

Redmer, D., Haugen, R., Stenbak, T., Arnold, D., Toutges, M., Berginski, H., Navanukraw, C., Limesand, W., Kirsch, J., and K.Kraft (2000). Effects of Gonadotropin Treatment on Incidence of Estrus and Pregnancy Rate in Ewes Synchronized with Synchro-Mate-B (SMB) and Subjected to Laparoscopic Artificial Insemination (LAI) During the Breeding Season. North Dakota State University, Fargo and Elite Genetics, Waukon, IA.

Riaz, H., Sattar, A., Arshad, M., and N. Ahmad (2012). Effect of synchronization protocols and GnRH treatment on the reproductive performance in goats. Small Ruminant Research 104: 151-155.

Roy, F., Maurel, M.-C., Combes, B., Vaiman, D., Cribiu, E.P., Lantier, I., Pobel, T., Deletang, F., Combarnous, Y., and F.Guillou (1999). The negative effect of repeated equine chorionic gonadotropin treatment on subsequent fertility in Alpine goats is due to a humoral immune response involving the major histocompatibility complex. Biology of reproduction 60: 805-813.

Saribay, M.K., Karaca, F., Dogruer, G., and C.T.Ates (2012). Effects of Long and Short-Term Progestagen Treatments Plus GnRH Followed by TAI on Fertility Parameters in Lactating Hair Goats during the Transition Period. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 18: 507-511.

Stevenson, J., Kobayashi, Y., and K. Thompson(1999). Reproductive performance of dairy cows in various programmed breeding systems including Ovsynch and combinations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prostaglandin F 2[alpha]. J. Dairy Science 82: 506-515.

Titi, H., Kridli, R., and M.Alnimer (2010). Estrus synchronization in sheep and goats using combinations of GnRH, progestagen and prostaglandin F2[alpha]. Reproduction in domestic animals 45: 594-599.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences
Date:Aug 31, 2017

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters