Dynamics of Neo-Latin and the Vernacular: Language and Poetics, Translation and Transfer.
The volume opens with a methodological intervention by Jan Bloemendal that essentially constitutes a response to ten questions that had originally been posed by Nikolaus Thurn in Neulatein und Volkssprachen (Munich, 2012). This is followed by the first of two sections, entitled "Language and Poetics," that explores the question of cultural exchange on a micro-level. The volume editor begins the section with a study of Dutch occasional poetry from the years 1635 to 1640 that shows how dangerous it is to try to construct larger generalizations from the interaction between Neo-Latin and the vernacular poetic repertoires in this specific area. Using the eleven volumes of Pieter Bor's History of the Dutch Revolt and the War against Spain (1595--1634), Harm-Jan van Dam explores the co-existence of both Latin and vernacular liminal poems in an important Dutch book of the Renaissance. Johanna Svennson in turn studies the division of labor between Latin and Danish in the speech community formed by the clergy in the province of Scania in the late seventeenth century. Ummu Yuksel's paper discusses two poems written by Martin Opitz in praise of Daniel Heinsius, which allows us to see how the figure of Heinsius can serve as both a representative of Latin learning and a symbol of Dutch literary and political nationalism. Eva van Hooijdonk extends this approach to the collection of Latin epigrams on Prince Maurice of Nassau that Hugo Grotius composed around 1600 to accompany a series of engravings depicting various Dutch successes in the revolt against the Spanish. The Maurice epigrams end up becoming an interesting way to mediate the transition from the German newsprint context in which the engravings originated to a self-consciously nationalistic context of Dutch vernacular poetry.
The second section, "Translation and Transfer," explores the process of cultural dynamics on the macro-level, with a focus on translation and cultural or knowledge transfer. Annet den Haan explores why Giannozzo Manetti believed that a translation into the vernacular can never be a good translation, while Beate Hintzen looks at a series of poems connected to Martin Opitz to bring out the role of Greek within the contact between Latin and vernacular literature, and Guillaume van Gemert follows a treatise of Hugo Grotius from its beginnings as a work of self-apology in a Dutch context through a Latin translation in which the theological content stood front and center to a series of German translations, one of which made its way into the hands of a Swedish general. Ingrid De Smet in turn shows how Jacques Auguste de Thou was forced to rely at least in part on the vernacular jargon of sixteenth-century falconers in his efforts to write on the subject in Latin. Bettina Noak returns to a theological focus with a study of paratexts as a means of knowledge transfer in an early modern encounter with Hinduism written in Dutch, while David Kromhout studies the changes in the discourse of the early seventeenth-century Leiden humanists by focusing on three bilingual Dutch poets, Daniel Heinsius, Jacob Cats, and Hugo Grotius. Ingrid Rowland closes out this section with a fascinating study of the interplay between Latin and vernacular in Vitruvius's sixteenth-century readers. The concluding chapter, again by the volume editor, brings together the dynamic model of bilingual interaction to shed light on allied issues like imitatio / aemulatio, translation studies, and transfer studies in the Renaissance. The volume also contains a selected bibliography of relevant secondary works.
Unlike a good number of books containing essays by various scholars, this one has a strong methodological and thematic unity that makes the whole more than the sum of its parts. It is worth noting that Philip Ford's important book The Judgment of Palaemon: The Contest between Neo-Latin and Vernacular Poetry in Renaissance France appeared recently in this same series, to which we owe a considerable debt for advancing discussion on a topic of growing interest in Neo-Latin studies. (Craig Kallendorf, Texas A&M University)