Printer Friendly

Dramatic drop in global ozone layer.

Dramatic drop in global ozone layer

While atmospheric scientists have been reporting for years that the global layer of life-protecting ozone is disappearing right before our eyes, these statements have attracted considerable criticism from other experts who say such claims are inaccurate. But an international panel of more than 100 experts released a long-awaited report this week that may put to rest many debates concerning the disappearing ozone phenomenon. And by coincidence, on the day before this report's release the United States became the second country to ratify an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer.

After a year and a half spent reanalyzing almost all the available ozone data, the scientific panel concluded that global levels of stratospheric ozone have dropped by 2.5 percent between 1978 and 1985 as a result of both human pollution and natural patterns. The panel also predicted a solar-cycle-induced global ozone increase for the next few years.

The recent decrease is significantly smaller than those described in previous reports, which were based on satellite data that are suspect because of equipment problems (SN: 1/9/88, p.20). "The very large trends reported using the satellite data alone were incorrect," says Robert Watson of NASA, who chaired the Ozone Trends Panel. "The reason is that there is an optical component called the diffuser plate that both satellite [instruments] use to measure ozone. This optical plate degrades with time."

The panel based its conclusions on ground-based instruments called Dobson meters, which have been measuring ozone levels at certain stations for 30 years. By comparing the Dobson measurements to those taken with instruments aboard the Nimbus 7 satellite, the scientists could correct for the degrading diffuser plate on the satellite.

Although the newer estimates of ozone losses were smaller than those in previous reports, the panel found that the decreases are much greater than those predicted by theoretical models, which the scientists say do not account for certain "unusual" atmospheric chemical reactions. "Theory would predict that in response to trace gases, ozone should have changed between 1 and 2 percent between 1969 and 1986; the observed changes in the wintertime reach 6 percent," says Watson.

The Antarctic has received much attention because of its unexpected ozone loss in early springtime. But the panel also found that high northern latitudes experienced unusually heavy loss during the study period.

During an experiment in Antarctica last year, researchers concluded that ice particles in the stratosphere play an integral role in the chemical destruction of ozone (SN: 10/10/87, p.230). Although these particles are less prevalent in the north, Watson suspects that they may be playing a similar but less pronounced role in the north. Computer models cannot yet account for this chemistry, and that may be why these models underestimate ozone loss for winter, when the atmospheric ice particles form.

Ozone loss was greatest over the polar regions and slightly less severe over the midlatitudes, where much of the world's human population lives. These losses concern scientists, since ozone ordinarily filters out ultraviolet rays that can harm animal and plant life.

Human pollution, most notably chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) gases, is responsible for at least part of the ozone disappearance, the panel concluded. But the ozone levels are also responding to natural events, such as the 11-year solar cycle, upper-atmosphere wind patterns and volcanic eruptions.

The solar cycle--a natural waxing and waning in the sun's radiation--appears to have a strong effect on ozone concentrations. From 1979 through 1986, the ultraviolet radiation coming from the sun has been weakening. Since ultraviolet radiation creates ozone, this weakening has compounded CFCs' action in the stratosphere, and ozone levels have dropped.

In 1986 the solar cycle shifted, and it is currently building toward a maximum expected around 1991. "So for the next five or six years we may expect an increase in ozone globally rather than a decrease. However, once we pass 1991... we would then expect to see a decrease in ozone," says Watson.

Although ozone levels rise and fall with the solar cycle, the long-term average level is decreasing because CFCs are building up in the stratosphere, he says.

Last September, 31 nations signed a treaty to protect ozone by cutting CFC production. Senate approval of the treaty made the United States the second country -- behind Mexico -- to ratify the accord.
COPYRIGHT 1988 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1988, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:report from Ozone Trends Panel
Author:Monastersky, Richard
Publication:Science News
Date:Mar 19, 1988
Previous Article:New model for AIDS in Third World.
Next Article:Aye-aye, primate ... stateside at last.

Related Articles
Antarctic ozone reaches lowest levels.
Ozone reports stir debate.
UV radiation decreasing over U.S.?
Arctic zone: signs of chemical destruction.
New chemical model, new ozone fear.
Clouds without a silver lining: stratospheric clouds help pollutants poke holes in the ozone layer.
Fate of Arctic ozone remains up in the air.
Arctic air primed to destroy ozone.
Summer ozone loss detected for first time.
The word about ozone.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters