Printer Friendly

Dr. of Law.

The Bar just declared that "lawyers who want to use their law degrees in advertising are limited to using the language on their diplomas, with no translations." ("Bar board settles Dr. of Law debate," August 15, News.) Bar Ethics Counsel Elizabeth Tarbert explained this new bright line rule means that "lawyers would not be able to translate their degree into another language."

Really? Board member Ben Kuehne is right when he notes "this may need a little more study." My degree, at least what of it I can decipher without looking at the translation that came with it, indicates that on XXIII MAII ANNO DOMINI MMIV, the Scholare Juris of Collegii Georgiopolitam gave me a Juris Doctorem. I am not trying to advertise myself with this letter questioning the wisdom of this new policy, but loosely translated, this means that I attended Georgetown University Law Center and earned a Juris Doctor in 2004.

Also, how can Bar members with American LL.M.s but foreign law degrees advertise themselves? Must their foreign degrees be indicated in the language issued? What if that degree is written in Japanese characters? That would make Yellow Pages advertising difficult for foreign attorneys and possibly raise some constitutional concerns for the Bar.

Must all similarly situated lawyers now consult with Bar counsel before deviating from using the exact, if confusing, language from a diploma when advertising educational achievement?

Aaron M. Clemens

West Palm Beach
COPYRIGHT 2006 Florida Bar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Author:Clemens, Aaron M.
Publication:Florida Bar News
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Sep 1, 2006
Words:239
Previous Article:Florida Lawyers Assistance can help attorneys get back on track.
Next Article:Reflections of an old lawyer.


Related Articles
HCQIA Cloaks Review Boards with Immunity.
MI: failure to diagnose ruptured spleen in ER: non-compliance with limitations statute-dismissal. (Hospital Law Decisions of Note).
Did one-year absence from jurisdiction toll limitations?
LA: med. school prof. withdraws recommendation: liability for lost earnings of specialist.
Peer review privilege does not cover all records.
Failure to exercise right to appeal denial of privlieges.
NY: did doctrine of equitable estoppel apply?: estoppel did not apply--limitations barred suit.
From Norman Lower re "The task before us" (C.I., June 2007, p. 3).

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters