Doping induced structural stability and electronic properties of GaN nanotubes.
The study of carbon nanotubes from last few decades has grown widely. The first step for growth of carbon nanotubes was fullerene structure, which was discovered in 1985. In 1991 Iijima  synthesizes multiwall carbon nanotubes by Arc Discharge Method, in 1993 Bethune et al.  reports the synthesis of single wall carbon nanotube using cobalt as a catalyst. Carbon nanotubes become more interesting because of their various properties, due to the changing the diameter and helical arrangement of carbon nanotubes, it shows metallic as well as semiconducting behavior [3, 4]. Carbon nanotubes are basically a rolled one atom thick layer of sheet called Graphene, where the length of tube is larger than the tube diameter . Carbon nanotubes show a wide range of applications in the area of electronic, optical, medical, mechanical, and other industries [5-11]. Due to the advanced application of carbon nanotubes, researchers are also trying for other materials nanotubes. GaN  is of greatimportancedue to itshighthermal, mechanical stability, and optoelectronic properties. Due to the large direct band gap of GaN, it is used in high-temperature, high-power electronics and short wavelength (UV) detectors. Few studies [13,14] are devoted to the stability analysis of GaN nanotube, where GaN nanotubes are found to be stable and can be synthesized under some extreme conditions. Literature also reports that the energy gap decreases by decreasing the tube diameter and zigzag GaN nanotubes show direct band gap, whereas armchair and chiral GaN nanotubes have the indirect band gap. Our group has also investigated the structural and electronic properties of several nanotubes [15-19]. Mg-doped [20, 21] GaN nanocages and nanotubes can be magnetic with Mg-contributed spins distributed over the neighboring N sites. The study  based on Cr-doped GaN nanotubes confirms the coupling between two Cr atoms mediated by the neighboring N is ferromagnetic, but changes to ferrimagnetic as the cluster grows. Literature  shows the effect of nitrogen doping on the electronic and magnetic properties of carbon nanotubes, where, at small N-doping, the finite-length zigzag CNTs maintains an ant ferromagnetic (AFM) ground state, whereas the conversion from AFM to a nonmagnetic state occurs at high N-concentrations. Researchers [24-26] have also analyzed the properties of III-nitride nanotubes under compression, where, the Young's modulus shows the spin suppression independent of tube diameter.
2. Computational Detail
The present theoretical study has been made by using abinitio approach based on density functional theory (DFT) [27, 28] for the analysis of electronic properties of GaN nanotubes, we used Atomistix Toolkit-Virtual NanoLab (ATK-VNL)  tool which uses linear combination of atomic orbital's (LCAOs) with norm conserving pseudo potential. Here GGA approximation is used as exchange correlation function in the form of revised Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE)  type parameterization. For describing the valence electron, double-^ double polarized basis set has been used. To achieve the convergence, mesh cutoff energy has been finalized on the ground of convergence principle and for the present computation 150 Ryd has been predicted as the most suitable one after several convergence test, throughout the calculation. The minimization of total energy has been performed to optimize the bond length of the nanotubes. In the entire set of optimization run, maximum force tolerance was set at 0.05 eV/A. For achieving the total energy convergence we have used K-point sampling of 1 x 1 x 20.
3. Results and Discussion
In the present work, we have used (2,1) chiral, (3,3) armchair, and (6, 0) and (10, 0) zigzag single walled GaN nanotubes of diameter 2.83 A, 5.30 A, 6.08 A, and 10.01 A, respectively. Initially the structural stability and electronic properties of undoped (2, 1) chiral, (3, 3) armchair, (6, 0) and (10, 0) zigzag GaN nanotubes have been investigated. Further we have seen the effect of manganese doping on GaN nanotubes structural stability and electronic properties in the form of replacing the Ga atoms with the manganese (Mn) atoms up to four; Figure 1 shows the one manganese doped GaN nanotubes of different chirality.
4. Structural Stability
The structural stability analysis of (2, 1) chiral, (3, 3) armchair, and (6, 0) and (10, 0) Zigzag single walled GaN nanotubes has been performed by minimizing the total energy of ground state as a function of bond length. For the nanostructures the stability can be best defined through the binding/cohesive energy for the same. We have calculated the binding as well as formation energy of these nanotubes with the help of total energy of ground state tabulated in Table 1. The ground state total energy of GaN nanotubes shows a decreasing trend with the manganese concentration, whereas, the binding energy increases and hence the tubes are getting more and more stable stable with higher Mn concentration. The bond length of doped nanotubes is also decreasing with increases in the concentration of manganese atoms in all the GaN nanotubes taken into consideration. On the other hand the binding energy of manganese doped GaN nanotubes shows the proportional relation with the manganese atoms as shown in Figure 2. With the highest binding energy 4-Mn doped (3, 3) GaN shows the most stable structure amongst all others taken into consideration. The binding energy of the single wall GaN nanotubes has been obtained from the following relation:
[E.sub.Binding] = ([E.sub.T] - x[E.sub.Ga] - y[E.sub.N] - z[E.sub.Mn]) / [x + y + Z], (1)
where [E.sub.T] is the total energy of single wall GaN nanotubes, [E.sub.Ga], [E.sub.N], and [E.sub.Mn] are the total energy of single-free gallium, nitrogen, and manganese atoms and x, y, and z are the number of gallium, nitrogen, and manganese atoms in the supercell, respectively.
Moreover the formation energy of manganese doped GaN nanotube is calculated by using the ground state energy of relaxed structures. The formation energy of GaN nanotubes has been calculated by using the following relation:
[E.sub.Formation] = ([E.sub.Doped GaNNT] - [E.sub.Pristine] - x[E.sub.Mn]) / N, (2)
where [E.sub.Doped GaNNT] is the total energy of doped GaN nanotube in the supercell, [E.sub.Pristine] is the total energy of pristine GaN nanotube, [E.sub.Mn] is the total energy of free manganese atom, and x and N are the number of manganese atoms and the total number of atoms in the supercell, respectively. The calculated formation energies of all the nanotubes taken into consideration are given in Table 1. Figure 3 shows the formation energy plot as a function of manganese doped GaN nanotubes, and analysis shows that by increasing the number of manganese atoms in GaN nanotubes the formation energy also increases and reaches towards more stability.
4.1. Electronic Properties. The electronic properties (band structure and density of states) of pristine and manganese doped GaN nanotubes have been computed at the stabilized bond length. The obtained results give the information on the band gap, its nature, and probability of finding the electron near the Fermi level. The calculated band gaps of all the GaN nanotubes taken into consideration are reported in Table 1 and discussed in the following sections.
4.2. Chiral (2, 1) GaN Nanotubes. The band structure plot of chiral (2, 1) type pristine GaN nanotube shows a very small indirect band gap of about 0.072 eV, shown in Figure 4. On increasing the Mn concentration in the GaN nanotubes the valance and conduction band comes near to the Fermi level and shows the smallest band gap of about 0.027 eV at 4 Mn doped GaN nanotube, whereas at the 3 Mn doped tube it is metallic. The DOS profile of chiral GaN nanotubes is shown in Figure 4, where in case of pristine chiral (2,1) GaN nanotube the highest peak in the conduction band region is present at around 16 eV and the highest peaks in the valance band region are at around -13.25 eV along with few disrupted peaks. At 1 Mn doped GaN nanotubes the DOS profile having the small disrupted peaks near the Fermi level and the highest peak in the conduction band region is present at around 12.4 eV and in the valance band region at -13.25 eV. The DOS profile confirms that on increasing the Mn concentration in GaN nanotubes, the presence of electrons near the Fermi level increases.
4.3. Armchair (3, 3) GaN Nanotubes. The band structure plot of pristine armchair (3, 3) GaN nanotube shows an indirect band gap of about 1.75 eV, shown in Figure 5. Here too, the introduction of Mn at the site of Ga in GaN nanotube brings the conduction band near to the Fermi level and for single Mn doping the gap reduces to 0.19 eV. On increasing the Mn concentration in the GaN nanotubes the energy levels of valance and conduction band cross the Fermi level and transform the semiconducting behavior of these nanotubes into metallic. To understand the localization of electrons near the Fermi level, we have also plotted the density of states profile of these nanotubes. The DOS profile of armchair (3, 3) GaN nanotubes is shown in Figure 5, where, in case of pristine armchair (3, 3) GaN nanotube, the highest peak in the conduction band region can be seen at around 4.7 eV and a highest peak in the valance band region at around -1.8 eV along with few disrupted peaks. At 1 Mn doped GaN nanotubes, the DOS profile having few disrupted peaks near the Fermi level and the highest peak in the conduction band region is present at around 9.5 eV and in the valance band region at around -3eV. The DOS profile shows that, by increasing the concentration of Mn atom in GaN nanotubes, the localization of electron increases near the Fermi level.
4.4. Zigzag (6, 0) and (10, 0) GaN Nanotubes. The (6, 0) and (10, 0) zigzag pristine and three manganese doped GaN nanotubes show direct band gap of about 2.39 and 2.80 eV, respectively. The nanotube transforms to metallic by increasing the number of manganese atoms from one to four in (6, 0) and (10, 0) GaN nanotubes, while with three manganese doping they show a very small direct band gap of about 0.0083 eV and 0.0018 eV, respectively. The band structure and DOS profile of zigzag (6, 0) and (10, 0) GaN nanotubes are shown in Figure 6, where in case of pristine zigzag (6, 0) GaN nanotube the highest peak in the conduction band region is present at around 12.4 eV and a highest peak in the valance band region at around -13.5 eV, with few disrupted peaks. At 1 Mn doped zigzag (6, 0) and (10, 0) GaN nanotubes the DOS profile having the small peaks near the Fermi level and the highest peak in the conduction band region is present at around 7.4 eV and 2.75 eV and in the valance band region at -15 eV and -5 eV, respectively The DOS profile shows that, by increasing the Mn concentration in GaN nanotubes, the number of peaks near the Fermi level increases in these zigzag (6, 0) and (10, 0) GaN nanotubes.
Ab-initio analysis has been performed for determining the structural stability and electronic properties of single walled Mn doped GaN nanotubes. With the highest binding energy 4Mn doped (3, 3) GaN nanotube have been defended as the most stable structure amongst all others taken into consideration. The doping of manganese in pristine GaN nanotube decreases the band gap up to certain level and again changes its trend. The findings reported in the present paper on the doping effect will certainly provide a new dimension to the use of these Mn doped GaN nanotubes in a variety of applications.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
The authors are thankful to ABV-IIITM Gwalior for providing the infrastructural support to perform the present computation at the Computational Nanoscience and Technology Lab.
 S. Iijima, "Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon," Nature, vol. 354, pp. 56-58, 1991.
 D. S. Bethune, C. H. Kiang, M. S. De Vries et al., "Cobalt-catalyzed growth of carbon nanotubes with single-atomic-layer walls," Nature, vol. 363, pp. 605-607, 1993.
 P. R. Bandaru, "Electrical properties and applications of carbon nanotube structures," Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 7, no. 4-5, pp. 1239-1267, 2007.
 J. W. Ding, X. H. Yan, J. X. Cao, D. L. Wang, Y. Tang, and Q. B. Yang, "Curvature and strain effects on electronic properties of single-wall carbon nanotubes," Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 15, no. 27, pp. L439-L445, 2003.
 J. Robertson, "Realistic application of CNTs," Materials Today, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 46-52, 2004.
 S. Reich and C. Thomsen, "Electronic band structure of isolated and bundled carbon nanotubes," Physical Review Letters, vol. 65, Article ID 155411, pp. 1-10, 2002.
 N. Sinha and J. T.-W. Yeow, "Carbon nanotubes for biomedical applications," IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 180-195, 2005.
 P. A. Gowri Sankar and K. U. Kumar, "Mechanical and electrical properties of single walled carbon nanotubes: a computational study," European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 342-358, 2011.
 A. Ayuela, L. Chico, and W. Jaskolski, "Electronic band structure of carbon nanotube superlattices from first-principles calculations," Physical Review B, vol. 77, no. 8, Article ID 085435, 2008.
 E. Li, X. Wang, L. Hou, D. Zhao, Y. Dai, and X. Wang, "Study on the electronic transport properties of zigzag GaN nanotubes," Journal of Physics, vol. 276, no. 1, Article ID 012046, 2011.
 S. M. Lee, Y. H. Lee, Y. G. Hwang, and C. J. Lee, "Electronic structures of GaN nanotubes," Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. S253-S257, 1999.
 F. Ghorbani Avaresi and A. A. Shokri, "Optical properties of a GaN nanotube in presence of an external field: first principal approach," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Neutron Scattering, vol. 4, pp. 12-14, 2012.
 S. M. Lee, Y. H. Lee, Y. G. Hwang, and C. J. Lee, "Electronic structures of GaN nanotubes," Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. S253-S257, 1999.
 S. M. Lee, Y. H. Lee, Y. G. Hwang, J. Elsner, D. Porezag, and T. Frauenheim, "Stability and electronic structure of GaN nanotubes from density-functional calculations," Physical Review B, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. S253-S257, 1999.
 A. Srivastava, M. Sharma, N. Tyagi, and S. L. Kothari, "Diameter dependent electronic properties of zigzag single wall BX, (X = N, P, As) nanotubes: Ab-Initio Study," Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 9, pp. 1693-1699, 2012.
 U. S. Sharma, A. Srivastava, and U. P. Verma, "Ab-initio study of zigzag single wall carbon nanotubes," Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1479-1481, 2010.
 A. Srivastava, N. Saraf, and A. K. Nagawat, "Conductance analysis of zigzag carbon nanotubes under stress: Ab-Initio Study," Quantum Matter, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 401-407, 2013.
 A. Srivastava, N. Jain, and A. K. Nagawat, "Effect of stone-wales defects on electronic properties of CNTs: Ab-Initio Study," Quantum Matter, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 307-313, 2013.
 K. R. Khaddeo, A. Srivastava, and R. Kurchania, "Electronic properties of GaN Nanotube: AbInitio Study," Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2066-2070, 2013.
 S. Hao, G. Zhou, J. Wu, W. Duan, and B. Lin Gu, "Spin-polarized electron emitter: Mn-doped GaN nanotubes and their arrays," Physical Review, vol. 69, no. 11, Article ID 113403, 4 pages, 2004.
 Y. Guo, M. Chen, Z. Guo, and X. Yan, "First-principles calculations for magnetic properties of Mn-doped GaN nanotubes," Physics Letters A, vol. 372, no. 15, pp. 2688-2691, 2008.
 Q. Wang, Q. Sun, P. Jena, and Y. Kawazoe, "Clustering of Cr in GaN nanotubes and the onset of ferrimagnetic order," Physical Review B, vol. 73, no. 20, Article ID 205320, 2006.
 S. Tang and Z. Cao, "Electronic and magnetic properties of nitrogen-doped finite-size and open-ended zigzag carbon nanotubes," Computational Materials Science, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1917-1924, 2011.
 J. W. Kang and H. J. Hwang, "Atomistic study of Ill-nitride nanotubes," Computational Materials Science, vol. 31, no. 3-4, pp. 237-246, 2004.
 J. W. Kang and H. J. Hwang, "Molecular dynamics simulations of energetic aluminum cluster deposition," Computational Materials Science, vol. 23, no. 1-4, pp. 105-110, 2002.
 J.-W. Kang and H.-J. Hwang, "Molecular dynamics simulations of ionized cluster beam deposition: case of study of aluminum," Computational Materials Science, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 509-514, 2001.
 W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, "Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects," Physical Review A, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. A1133-A1138, 1965.
 R. M. Dreizler and E. K. U. Gross, Density Functional Theory, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1990.
Anurag Srivastava, (1) Mohammad Irfan Khan, (1,2) Neha Tyagi, (1) and Purnima Swaroop Khare (2)
(1) Advanced Materials Research Group, Computational Nano Science & Technology Lab, ABV-Indian Institute of Information Technology & Management Gwalior (M.P.) 474015, India
(2) School of Nanotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya Bhopal (M.P.) 462033, India
Correspondence should be addressed to Anurag Srivastava; firstname.lastname@example.org
Received 4 August 2013; Accepted 21 October 2013; Published 24 February 2014
Academic Editors: G.-R. Li and G. Ouyang
TABLE 1: The bond length, binding energy, formation energy, and bandgaps of different types of doped and undoped single walled GaN nanotubes. Nanotubes Bond length Total Binding ([Angstrom]) energy (eV) energy (eV) Pristine chiral (2,1) 1.94 -4650 5.60 One-Mn atom doping 1.94 -5206.36 5.79 Two-Mn atom doping 1.93 -5762.87 5.98 Three-Mn atom doping 1.93 -6319.66 6.18 Four-Mn atom doping 1.92 -6876.35 6.38 Pristine armchair (3, 3) 1.85 -2000.69 6.25 One-Mn atom doping 1.84 -2553.10 6.61 Two-Mn atom doping 1.82 -3112.41 7.04 Three-Mn atom doping 1.80 -3669.09 7.51 Four-Mn atom doping 1.78 -4225.88 7.98 Pristine zigzag (6, 0) 1.84 -4002.60 6.31 One-Mn atom doping 1.84 -4556.99 6.44 Two-Mn atom doping 1.83 -5112.42 6.62 Three-Mn atom doping 1.82 -5667.82 6.80 Four-Mn atom doping 1.82 -6223.29 6.98 Pristine zigzag (10, 0) 1.82 -6675.13 6.41 One-Mn atom doping 1.82 -7229.13 6.48 Two-Mn atom doping 1.82 -7784.24 6.58 Three-Mn atom doping 1.82 -8339.41 6.68 Four-Mn atom doping 1.81 -8894.57 6.78 Nanotubes Formation Band energy (eV) gap (eV) Pristine chiral (2,1) -- 0.072I One-Mn atom doping 1.87 0.056I Two-Mn atom doping 3.74 0.045I Three-Mn atom doping 5.60 M Four-Mn atom doping 7.46 0.027I Pristine armchair (3, 3) -- 1.75I One-Mn atom doping 4.45 0.19I Two-Mn atom doping 8.83 M Three-Mn atom doping 13.18 M Four-Mn atom doping 17.52 M Pristine zigzag (6, 0) -- 2.39D One-Mn atom doping 2.26 M Two-Mn atom doping 4.50 M Three-Mn atom doping 6.72 0.0083 Four-Mn atom doping 8.94 M Pristine zigzag (10, 0) -- 2.80D One-Mn atom doping 1.37 M Two-Mn atom doping 2.71 M Three-Mn atom doping 4.06 0.0018D Four-Mn atom doping 5.40 M D: direct, I: indirect, and M: metallic.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Research Article|
|Author:||Srivastava, Anurag; Khan, Mohammad Irfan; Tyagi, Neha; Khare, Purnima Swaroop|
|Publication:||The Scientific World Journal|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Classification based on pruning and double covered rule sets for the Internet of things applications.|
|Next Article:||The technical efficiency of specialised milk farms: a regional view.|