Printer Friendly

Does supplemental LH changes rate and time to ovulation and embryo yield in Santa Ines ewes treated for superovulation with FSH plus eCG?/Suplementacao com LH modifica a taxa e momento da ovulacao e a producao de embrioes em ovelhas Santa Ines superovuladas com FSH e eCG?

INTRODUCTION

Small ruminants make an important contribution to the Brazilian economy. The Brazilian sheep flock includes more than 16 million animals, mainly (~65%) of the Santa Ines breed (IBGE, 2008). Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) is a reproductive technology that facilitates genetic improvement, and its commercial application in Brazilian Santa Ines sheep has increased dramatically in recent years.

High individual variability in the superovulatory (SOV) response and the transferable embryo yield is common in ewes and compromises the success ofMOET programs (MENCHACA et al., 2010). The high variability of responses is notably the main challenge to increase the efficiency of MOET programs in sheep (OLIVEIRA, 2011). Specifically, the yields are decreased by the lack of or reduction in ovulatory response after stimulation with an exogenous hormone supply. This occurs in approximately 20-30% of the ewes (GONZALEZ-BULNES et al., 2000). A possible cause may a deficient or inexistent preovulatory LH surge (GONZALEZ-BULNES et al., 2003) or the presence of non-responsive follicles due to a downregulation of the granulosa and theca LH receptors (LOPEZ-DIAZ & BOSU, 1992). COGNIE et al. (1986) suggested that the administration of LH at the end of SOV treatment with exogenous FSH might increase the ovulation rate and the number of recovered embryos. Very few studies (PICAZO et al., 1996; D'ALESSANDRO et al., 2005) on MOET have focused on increasing the ovulation rate and the number of viable embryos per donor by modifying the FSH/LH ratio at the end of an FSH treatment. The effects of this procedure are still unclear and may differ between different genotypes (COGNIE et al., 1986; PICAZO et al., 1996). The literature shows that breed differences in follicle growth, ovulation rate and fluctuations of FSH and LH lead to differential responses to exogenous gonadotrophins (AMMOUN et al., 2006; SIMONETTI et al., 2008), emphasizing the need for specific treatments for each breed. The breed factor accounted for approximately 30% of the variability in the embryo yields obtained in response to FSH treatments (VIVANCO et al., 1994). For these reasons, it is not possible to predict changes in the ovulation rate and embryo yield related to modifying the FSH/LH ratio in the SOV protocol for Santa Ines ewes.

Additionally, supplemental LH in SOV protocols that employ a combination of FSH plus eCG has not yet been studied. The use of moderate dose of eCG in SOV treatment is very common in sheep and based on the function of final maturation of follicles (MENCHACA et al., 2010). The long half-life of eCG contributes for modification of ratio FSH:LH and complete the final pre-ovulation growth of follicles, however, it is believed that it is not able to directly induce a preovulatory LH peak. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate whether supplemental LH given at the end of the FSH treatment changes the time to ovulation (synchronous ovulation) and increases the ovulation rate and embryo yield in Santa Ines ewes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted at a commercial farm in southwestern Brazil from May through November 2007. Ten non-pregnant pluriparous Santa Ines ewes with a body condition score of 3.95 [+ or -] 0.32 (1 to 5 point scale; RUSSEL et al., 1969) and 60.3 [+ or -] 10.74kg of body weight were used as embryo donors. The animals were maintained on Coastcross (Cynodon sp.) pasture with free access to mineralized salt and water. To accomplish a crossover design study, all of the ewes were subjected to two SOV protocols over a 60-day interval, totaling twenty MOET programs. The control SOV protocol used follow the traditional pattern of commercial use in Brazil (GUSMAO, 2006). On a random day of the estrous cycle (D0), the ewes received a progesterone-releasing (P4) intravaginal device (CIDR[R]; Pfizer-New Zealand) that was replaced with a new one 7 days later, totaling 14 days of treatment. On D7, 37.5 [micro]g of d-cloprostenol (Prolise[R], Arsa-Argentina) i.m. were administered. The SOV treatment started 48h (D12) before the CIDR removal and consisted of 256mg of pFSH (Folltropin[R], Bioniche-Canada; ratio FSH:LH of 5.25:1) i.m., administered in 4 decreasing doses, with each dose repeated once after 12h (48, 48, 36, 36, 24, 24, 20 and 20mg of pFSH) for a total of 8 administrations. The P4 device was removed at the time of the sixth pFSH administration. At this time (D14), the ewes received 200IU of eCG (Novormon[R], Syntex-Argentina) and 37.5[micro]g of d-cloprostenol i.m. On D15, the ewes were assigned to one of the groups (control: without LH; LH: with LH). The Control sheep (n=10) received no additional treatment, whereas the LH ewes (n=10) were treated with 7.5mg of LH (Lutropin[R], BionicheCanada; ratio FSH:LH constantly low) 24h after CIDR removal (D15). Fixed-time artificial inseminations (FTAI) using frozen-thawed semen were performed 42 and 48h after CIDR removal.

The protocols for SOV used avoid the need for estrus detection (FTAI). However, the observation of the onset of estrus (i.e., concentration or dispersion among animals) was used as an auxiliary tool to evaluate the ewes response to the treatment. At the end of the P4 treatment, the estrus detection was accomplished using teasers (vasectomized rams) following the proportion of the 1:4 donors. The pectoral regions of the males were painted with colored grease, and they were kept with the ewes for two days. When the females were mounted, the ewes were color-tagged with the grease. Identification of the tagged females was done three times daily (6:00, 12:00 and 18:00h), during the two days (D15 and D16).

Intrauterine AI was performed by laparoscopy (Karl Storz, Alemanha). A single batch, 0.25mL straw of frozen-thawed semen (sperm concentration approximately 100 x [10.sup.6]/palette) from a single ram was used per uterine horn in each AI. Previous evaluation of the sperm for physical and morphological parameters had been conducted to assure the semen quality. The laparoscopies were performed under sedation and local anesthesia at local abdominal puncture points. Concurrently with the AI and embryo collection procedures (42h, 48h, and 7 days after CIDR removal, respectively), the ovarian structures were evaluated by laparoscopy. In the first two evaluations, the number of large follicles (LF), preovulatory follicles (POF), follicles that had undergone ovulation (ovulated, OF; visualization of a hemorrhagic site), and corpus luteum (CL) were determined. The LF and POF differ by size (approximately 4-5.5mm and >6mm of diameter, respectively). At the last assessment, the presence and the number of anovulatory follicles (AF) and CL were registered and the occurrence of ovulation was observed. The AF were follicles that reached the preovulatory size and were still present on the ovaries at this evaluation (i.e., no ovulation) according to HEIDARI et al. (2010). Ovulation was considered to have occurred when a LF or POF that had been previously observed was no longer present, and a CL had appeared on the same ovary where these follicles had been detected during the previous laparoscopy.

Seven days after the CIDR removal, the ova/ embryos were collected by laparotomy under anesthesia. Each uterine horn was flushed with 60mL of flushing media (DPBS[R], Cultilab, Brazil) at 37[degrees]C. Briefly, the flushing media was injected via a 20G catheter inserted at the proximal portion of the uterine horn and collected via a n.8 Foley catheter that had been inserted at the external bifurcation of each uterine horn. The recovered structures were classified according to the degree of development, and the embryos were maintained in holding media (Holding plus[R], Cultilab, Brazil). Morphological evaluation was performed under a stereomicroscope (40X magnification) following the IETS recommendations. The SOV response was classified using three scores (adapted from CORDEIRO et al., 2003) as follows: (0) ewes with 4 or less CL, characterizing a lack of response to the SOV treatment; (1) ewes with 5 to 10CL, characterizing intermediate SOV response; and (2) ewes with 11 or more CL, characterizing high response to the SOV treatment. According to the time to ovulation, the ewes were classified as: (i) ewes that ovulated before 42h, (ii) those that ovulated between 42 and 48h, and (iii) ewes that ovulated 48h after CIDR removal.

The data analysis was performed using the SAS v 9.2 (SAS/STAT Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Tests for normality of residuals and homogeneity of variances were conducted for each variable. All dependent variables related to estrus (i.e., the onset of estrus), ovarian structures (i.e., the number of LF, POF, OF AF and CL), time to ovulation (i.e., the frequency of ewes that ovulated before 42h, between 42h and 48h, and after 48h after CIDR removal), SOV response (i.e. the ovulation rate, the number of CL, the ovulation failure rate, and the number of AF) and embryo yield (i.e., the number and rate of the structures recovered, viable embryos, unfertilized ova and degenerated embryos) were analyzed by ANOVA using the GLM procedure and compared using a Tukey test. The values are presented as mean [+ or -] S.E.M. The statistical significance was accepted when P [less than or equal to] 0.05 and was defined as tendency whenP>0.05 and <0.10. A Pearson correlation analysis was realized between the ovulation time and the onset of estrus.

RESULTS

The data on each ovarian structure evaluated by laparoscopy 42h, 48h and seven days after CIDR removal are shown in table 1. The total number of ovulatory follicles was greater in the LH group than in the Control group (P=0.02). Regarding the follicular status in each evaluation time point, the frequency of LF at 42h after CIDR removal was greater in the Control ewes, whereas in ewes of LH group, POF and OF were more frequent (P<0.001). The mean number of LF per ewe was also greater in the Control ewes, whereas the mean number of POF was greater in LH ewes (P<0.001). Overall, a higher percentage of follicles in an advanced stage of development was observed in LH ewes than in the Control ewes.

As for the evaluation performed 48h after CIDR removal, the follicular stages of development were more homogenously distributed among the groups compared to the first evaluation. However, the frequency of LF was still greater in the Control ewes than in the LH ewes (P<0.001), and the frequency of POF (P=0.0003) and OF (P=0.02) were greater in the LH ewes than in the Control ewes, as described in the previous evaluation time point.

The supplemental LH tended to increase the frequency of CL seven days after CIDR removal and to reduce the frequency of AF in the LH ewes (P=0.08). However, a similar mean number of AF and CL per ewe was found in both groups 7 days after CIDR removal. Considering the ovulatory response, similar rates of ovulation (P=0.63) and ovulation failures (P=0.48) were detected between the groups (Table 2). When the SOV response was evaluated, none of the ewes were classified as score 0 (4 or less CL). The LH ewes were mainly (70%) classified as score 2 ([greater than or equal to] 11CL), and the remaining (30%) as score 1 (between 5 and 10CL), whereas half of the Control ewes were classified as score 2 and half as score 1. The supplemental LH produced a greater frequency of ewes with a high SOV response (P=0.05).

As for time to ovulation, 40% of the Control ewes ovulated 48h, whereas 30% ovulated before 42h and 30% between 42h and 48h after the CIDR withdrawal. For LH group, 60% of the ewes ovulated earlier (i.e., before 42h), whereas 10% ovulated between 42h and 48h, and 30% ovulated 48h after CIDR removal. However, because large individual variation observed among animals in the same group, there was no difference between groups (P=0.86). When statistical analysis was performed in each group, the frequency of LH ewes that ovulated before 42h was higher (P=0.05) than those that ovulated between 42h and 48h.

All of the ewes exhibited estrus over the 2 days immediately after CIDR removal. The onset of estrus was 25.2 [+ or -] 6.2h after CIDR removal in the Control ewes and 28.8 [+ or -] 12.6h in the LH ewes (P=0.7). Additionally, a low correlation (P>0.001, r=0.25) was found between the onset of estrus and the time to ovulation. The indexes of embryo yield showed similar patterns between groups (P>0.05, Table 2). However, the number of unfertilized ova tended (P=0.09) to be greater in LH group than in the Control. The minimum and maximun values shown in table 2 mark the high variability of superovulatory response and embryo yield, in both groups.

DISCUSSION

In the current study, the first laparoscopic evaluation showed that the ovarian follicles of LH group were classified as more advanced stages of development than Control. These data suggest that the supplemental LH accelerated the development and the maturation of the follicles, which is supported by the anticipation of ovulation observed in this group. In a previous study, the interval between sponge removal and the preovulatory LH surge was 37.2 [+ or -] 0.7h (ranging from 24 to 48h), whereas the mean time for the onset of ovulation was 65.4 [+ or -] 0.7h (ranging from 47 to 79h) in ewes subjected to SOV using only FSH (VEIGA-LOPEZ et al., 2008). According to SIMONETTI et al. (2008), the preovulatory LH peak occurs approximately 47.4 [+ or -] 1.9h after sponge removal when FSH is administered during four days without the use of eCG The same authors reported the occurrence of a delayed preovulatory LH surge when eCG was not administrated. In the present study, the preovulatory LH surge probably occurred earlier than described by these authors, as the OF and CL were observed 42h after CIDR removal, regardless of the group. An anticipated time to ovulation was found in this study compared to previous works (SIMONETTI et al., 2008; VEIGA-LOPEZ et al., 2008). This event may be related to the use of the association of FSH and eCG. Independently there was also anticipation of ovulation in response to supplementation of LH. Shown by the higher frequency of LH ewes that ovulated before 42h than between 42h and 48h. The onset of estrus also occurred earlier than reported by SIMONETTI et al. (2008; 40 [+ or -] 2.0h) and CORDEIRO et al. (2003; 36 [+ or -] 2.7h), highlighting the probable effect of eCG on anticipating estrus and ovulation. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that the timing of the FTAI should be adjusted depending on whether eCG is administered. Ewes subjected to MOET programs using FTAI that receive eCG may need to be inseminated earlier than those not receiving the eCG. Another factor that may have influenced the anticipation of the onset of estrus is the continued exposure of the ewes to the teasers during the period of estrus observation. When in continued contact with ewes, the male has a complete opportunity to express its full sexual behavior, including courtship and mating (ROMANO et al., 2001). Similar consideration should be taken when using hormones to induce ovulation (i.e., GnRH and LH). In previous studies, the use of GnRH after sponge removal concentrated the time to ovulation and increased the ovulation rate in ewes subjected to SOV (AKINLOSOTU & WILDER, 1993). However, in the current study, the use of LH was insufficient to concentrate the time to ovulation of the follicles from the same ewe and among the ewes, but it also seems to anticipate ovulation. Considering that the best results in fertility are determined by the relationship between the time to ovulation and the AI (LOPEZ SEBASTIAN et al., 2006). As the ewes received the FTAI at the same time in both treatments, the anticipation of the time to ovulation may be responsible for the higher number of unfertilized ova (P=0.09) observed in LH group, suggesting the need to adjust the time to AI when LH is given.

Overall, the ewes' response to the SOV treatment was satisfactory (4 or more CL) in all MOET programs. However, the LH treatment improved the frequency of ewes with a high SOV response (11 or more CL). The supplementation of LH also tended to increase the frequency of CL seven days after CIDR removal and to decrease the frequency of AF, but similar rates and numbers of ovulation and anovulatory failure were achieved. When other breeds of sheep (Manchega, Churra and Merino) were treated with LH at the end of the SOV treatment, the ovulation rate was unaltered (PICAZO et al., 1996). Additional, is important to emphasize that the number of ovulations in Santa Ines ewes was higher than in other breeds mentioned (5.2, 7.0 and 5.9 for Manchega, Churra and Merino, respectively). This fact, among others already reported, confirming the variation between breeds. However, in another study, decreasing the FSH dosage, combined with a higher LH dosage (FSH/LH ratio of 1.6 vs. 1.0, 0.6 and 0.3), increased the ovulation rate in dairy ewes in comparison to the constant FSH/LH ratio (D'ALESSANDRO et al., 2005). Thus, the importance of changing the FSH/LH ratio in SOV protocol and its effects on the ovulation rate are still controversial and vary according to the breed. In the present study, there was high individual variability in the SOV response, which may be partially responsible for the lack of improvement in the ovulation rate and the embryo yield in LH group. These results discredit our hypothesis that supplemental LH could improve the ovulation rate and reduce the variability responses among the ewes.

In conclusion, the supplementation with LH during protocols for SOV with FSH plus eCG increased the frequency of Santa Ines ewes showing a high SOV response and ovulating prior to 42h after CIDR removal, however, there was no synchrony between ovulation. It also decreased the frequency of AF, but the ovulation rate and the embryo yield were unaffected.

BIOETHICS AND BIOSSECURITY COMMITTEE APPROVAL

The (protocol number 21131).

REFERENCES

AMMOUN, I. et al. Effects of breed on kinetics of ovine FSH and ovarian response in superovulated sheep. Theriogenology, v.66, p.896-905, 2006. Available from: <http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0093691X06001233>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi: 10.1016/ j.theriogenology.2006.02.024.

AKINLOSOTU, B.A.; WILDER, C.D. Fertility and blood progesterone levels following LHRH induced superovulation in FSH treated anestrus goats. Theriogenology, v.40, p.895904, 1993. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/0093691X9390357B>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1016/0093-691X(93)90357-B.

COGNIE, Y. et al. The effect of modifying the FSH/LH ratio during the superovulatory treatment in ewes. Theriogenology, v.25, p.148 (abstract), 1986.

CORDEIRO, M.F. et al. Embryo recovery rate in Santa Ines ewes subjected to successive superovulatory treatments with pFSH. Small Ruminant Research, v.49, p.19-23, 2003. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S 0921448 803 0005 92>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00059-2.

D'ALESSANDRO, A.G. et al. How the FSH/LH ratio and dose numbers in the p-FSH administration treatment regimen, and insemination schedule affect superovulatory response in ewes. Theriogenology, v.63, p.1764-1774, 2005. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S 0093 691X0400264X>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.08.002.

GONZALEZ-BULNES, A. et al. Influence of maternal environment on the number of transferable embryos obtained in response to superovulatory FSH treatments in ewes. Reproduction Nutrition Development, v.43, p.17-28, 2003. Available from: <http://rnd.edpsciences.org/ index.php?volume=43&page=17&option=com_article&access= linkmanager&Itemid=129&edpsname=rnd&lang=>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi: 10.1051/rnd:2003003.

GONZALEZ-BULNES, A. et al. Effects of FSH commercial preparation and follicular status on follicular growth and superovulatory response in Spanish Merino ewes. Theriogenology, v.54, p.1055-1064, 2000. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S 0093 691X00004143>. Accesssed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00414-3.

GUSMAO, A.L. Transferencia de embrioes em pequenos ruminantes. O Embriao, v.25, p.6-9, 2006.

HEIDARI, F. et al. The effect of a GnRH antagonist pretreatment, in thesuperovulation of goats. Small Ruminant

Research, v.93, p.140-143, 2010. Available from: <http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0921448810001768>. Accessed: May 1, 2011. doi: 10.1016/ j.smallrumres.2010.05.013.

IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica). Pesquisa Producao da Pecuaria Municipal. Rio de Janeiro, 2010. V.36, 65p.

LOPEZ DIAZ, M.C.; BOSU, W.T.K. A review and an update of cystic ovarian degeneration in ruminants. Theriogenology, v.37, p.1163-1183, 1992. Available from: <http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ 0093691X9290173O>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1016/ 0093-691X(92)90173-O.

LOPEZ SEBASTIAN, A. et al. Control y manejo reproductivo en pequenos rumiantes. In: CURSO INTERNACIONAL DE REPRODUCCION ANIMAL, 29., Madrid. Compendio de Conferencias... Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria, 2006. p.43-52.

MENCHACA, A. et al. New approaches to superovulation and embryo transfer in small ruminants. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, v.22, p.113-118, 2010. Available from: <http://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/RD09222.htm>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1071/RD09222.

OLIVEIRA, M.E.F. State-of-the-art in the superovulation of ewes. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, v.39 (Suppl1), p.29-35, 2011. (in press)

PICAZO, R.A. et al. Effects of LH administration at the end of an FSH superovulatory regimen on ovulation rate and embryo production in three breeds of sheep. Theriogenology, v.45, p.1065-1073, 1996. Available from: <http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ 0093691X96000337>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1016/ 0093-691X(96)00033-7.

ROMANO, J.E. et al. A note on the effect of continuous ram presence on estrus onset, estrus duration and ovulation time in estrus synchronized ewes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.73, p.193-198, 2001. Available from: <http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0168159101001319>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1016/ S0168-1591(01)00131-9.

RUSSEL, A.J.F. et al. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal Agricultural Science, v. 72, p.451-454, 1969.

SIMONETTI, L. et al. Simplified superovulatory treatments in Corriedale ewes. Animal Reproduction Science, v. 104 n.2-4, p.227-237, 2008. Available from: <http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0378432007000401>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1016/ j.anireprosci.2007.01.020.

VEIGA-LOPEZ, A. et al. Timing of preovulatory LH surge and ovulation in superovulated sheep are affected by follicular status at start of the FSH treatment. Reproduction Domestic Animal, v.43, p.92-98, 2008. Available from: <http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.14390531.2007.00860.x/full>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00860.x.

VIVANCO, H.M. et al. Explaining the variability in superovulatory responses and yield of transferable embryos in sheep embryo transfer. Theriogenology, v.41, p.329 (abst.), 1994. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0093691X05802390>. Accessed: May 20, 2011. doi:10.1016/S0093-691X(05)80239-0.

Maria Emilia Franco Oliveira (I) * Mabel Freitas Cordeiro (I) Roberta Machado Ferreira (I) Samuel Figueiredo Souza (I) Juliana Souza Pinto Pieroni (I) Luiz Fernando de Souza Rodrigues (II) Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca (III) Wilter Ricardo Russiano Vicente (I)

(I) Faculdade de Ciencias Agrarias e Veterinarias, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil, Email: m_emiliafraoli@yahoo.com.br. * Autor para correspondencia.

(II) Universidade Federal Rural da Amazonia (UFRA), Belem, PA, Brasil.

(III) Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria Caprinos, Sobral, CE, Brasil.

Received 06.21.11 Approved 03.06.12 Returned by the author 04.28.12 CR-5575
Table 1--Mean [+ or -] SEM and percentage of large follicles (LF),
preovulatory follicles (PO), follicles that had undergone ovulation
(ovulated) and corpus luteum (CL) 42 and 48 hours after the removal
of the device from Santa Ines ewes subjected to a superovulation
program with (LH group) or without (control group) supplemental LH.

                           Control group (n=10 animals; 135 follicles)

Time   Item                % (n)                  Mean

42h    Follicles/animal                           13.5 [+ or -] 3.4 (a)
       LF (4-5.9 mm)       63.0% (A) (85/135)     4.2 [+ or -] 3.1 (C)
       PO (= 6 mm)         17.8% (A) (24/135)     1.2 [+ or -] 2.3 (C)
       Ovulated            17.8% (A) (24/135)     1.2 [+ or -] 2.3
       Corpus Luteum       1.5% (2/135)           0.1 [+ or -] 0.4

48h    LF (4-5.9 mm)       54.1% (A) (73/135)     3.7 [+ or -] 2.7 (C)
       PO (= 6 mm)         12.6% (A) (17/135)     0.9  [+ or -] 1.0
       Ovulated            14.1% (A) (19/135)     1.0 [+ or -] 1.6
       Corpus Luteum       19.3% (26/135)         1.3 [+ or -] 2.4

7d     Anov. Follicles     22.2% (a) (30/135)     3.0 [+ or -] 1.0
       Corpus Luteum       77.8% (a) (105/135)    10.5 [+ or -] 1.2

                              LH group (n=10 animals; 158 follicles)

Time   Item                % (n) Mean

42h    Follicles/animal                           15.8 [+ or -] 5.2 (a)
       LF (4-5.9 mm)       25.9% (B) (41/158)     2.1 [+ or -] 2.8 (d)
       PO (= 6 mm)         40.5% (B) (64/158)     3.2 [+ or -] 2.8 (d)
       Ovulated            31.6% (B) (50/158)     2.5 [+ or -] 3.2
       Corpus Luteum       1.9% (3/158)           0.2 [+ or -] 0.4

48h    LF (4-5.9 mm)       25.9% (B) (41/158)     2.1 [+ or -] 2.8 (d)
       PO (= 6 mm)         30.4% (B) (48/158)     2.4 [+ or -] 2.5
       Ovulated            24.7% (B) (39/158)     2.0 [+ or -] 2.2
       Corpus Luteum       19.0% (30/158)         1.5 [+ or -] 3.1

7d     Anov. Follicles     14.6% (b) (23/158)     2.3 [+ or -] 0.5
       Corpus Luteum       85.4% (b) (135/158)    13.5 [+ or -] 1.5

Different letters on the same row indicate differences at P<0.10
[tendency; (a) [not equal to] (b) (comparing the percentages)] or
P<0.05 [(A) [not equal to] (B) (comparing the percentages) and (C) [not
equal to] (D) (comparing the means)].

Table 2--Indexes of the superovulatory response and embryo yield in
Santa Ines ewes subjected to a superovulation protocol with (LH
group) or without (Control group) LH supplementation.

                                          Control group

                                                        Values

Variables                      Mean                  Min       Max

No. of MOET                    10
No. of CL/flushed donor        10.5 [+ or -] 1.2     5         15
Ovulation rate (%)             78.7 [+ or -] 7.2     41.7      100
No. of anovulatory follicles   3.0 [+ or -] 1.0      0         8
Ovulation failure rate (%)     3.4 [+ or -] 1.2      0         8.8
No. of structures recovered/   6.1 [+ or -] 1.5      1         14
  flushed per donor
Recovery rate (%)              51.7 [+ or -] 10.2    7.1       93.3
No. of viable embryos          3.8 [+ or -] 1.4      0         13
Viability rate (%)             64.2 [+ or -] 14.5    0         100
No. of unfertilized ova        1.7 [+ or -] 1.1      0         9
Unfertilization rate (%)       18.3 [+ or -] 12.6    0         90
No. of degenerated embryos     0.7 [+ or -] 0.2      0         2
Degeneration rate (%)          17.4 [+ or -] 10.1    0         100

                                          LH group

                                                      Values

Variables                      Mean                 Min     Max     P

No. of MOET                    10
No. of CL/flushed donor        13.5 [+ or -] 1.5    7       20     0.80
Ovulation rate (%)             84.8 [+ or -] 3.1    70      100    0.63
No. of anovulatory follicles   2.3 [+ or -] 0.5     0       5      0.51
Ovulation failure rate (%)     2.5 [+ or -] 0.6     0       5.3    0.48
No. of structures recovered/   8.4 [+ or -] 1.7     2       15     0.98
  flushed per donor
Recovery rate (%)              59.2 [+ or -] 7.8    28.6    88.2   0.92
No. of viable embryos          4.2 [+ or -] 1.7     0       15     0.95
Viability rate (%)             39.0 [+ or -] 10.9   0       73.3   0.36
No. of unfertilized ova        2.0 [+ or -] 1.0     0       9      0.09
Unfertilization rate (%)       32.0 [+ or -] 13.5   0       100    0.34
No. of degenerated embryos     2.2 [+ or -] 0.6     0       5      0.82
Degeneration rate (%)          26.1 [+ or -] 8.4    0       83.3   0.79
COPYRIGHT 2012 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Oliveira, Maria Emilia Franco; Cordeiro, Mabel Freitas; Ferreira, Roberta Machado; Souza, Samuel Fig
Publication:Ciencia Rural
Date:Jun 1, 2012
Words:4696
Previous Article:Electrical conductivity test in evaluating the physiological potential of eggplant seeds/Teste de condutividade eletrica na avaliacao do potencial...
Next Article:Meiotic behavior during microsporogenesis of Alchornea triplinervia (Sprengel) Muller Argoviensis/Comportamento meiotico durante a microsporogenese...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters