Does hormone therapy increase breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers?
Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD, is University of Florida Term Professor and Associate Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville; and Medical Director and Director of Menopause and Gynecologic Ultrasound Services, UF Women's Health Specialists-Emerson. Dr. Kaunitz serves on the OBG Management Board of Editors.
Kotsopoulos J, Gronwald J, Karlan BY, et al; Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. Hormone replacement therapy after oophorectomy and breast cancer risk among BRCA1 mutation carriers [published online ahead of print April 19, 2018], JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaon col.2018.02U.
Prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy (BO) reduces the risk of future ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. Women in this high-risk population may be reluctant, however, to use menopausal hormone therapy (HT) to mitigate the symptoms of surgical menopause because of concerns that it might elevate their risk of breast cancer.
To determine the relationship between HT use and BRCA1 -associated breast cancer, Kotsopoulos and colleagues conducted a multicenter international cohort study. They prospectively followed women with BRCA1 mutations who had undergone BO and had intact breasts and no history of breast cancer.
Details of the study
The study included women who had a BRCA1 mutation and considered HT use following BO. Women were excluded from the analysis if they had a prior diagnosis of breast cancer or had BO prior to study enrollment. Study participants completed a questionnaire at baseline and a follow-up questionnaire every 2 years thereafter. The primary end point was invasive breast cancer.
Among 872 participating BRCA1 carriers, 43% (n = 377) used HT following BO. Mean duration of HT use following BO was 3.9 years, with 69% of users taking estrogen therapy alone (ET) and 19% using estrogen plus progestogen therapy (EPT). Those who used HT were younger at the time of BO compared with women who never used HT (mean age, 43.0 vs 48.4 years).
During follow-up (mean, 7.6 years; range, 0.4-22.1), invasive breast cancer was diagnosed in similar proportions of HT users and nonusers--10.3% and 10.7%, respectively (P = .86). The hazard ratio was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.52; P = .89) for ever use of any type of hormone therapy versus no use.
When the type of HT used was examined, the 10-year actuarial risk of breast cancer was significantly lower with ET than with EPT (12% vs 22%, respectively; P = .04); this difference was more marked for women who underwent BO prior to age 45 (9% vs 24%; P = .009).
Study strengths and weaknesses
This investigation had several strengths, including the large number of BRCA1 mutation carriers studied, the relatively long follow-up, and the detailed exposure data obtained.
The use of self-administered questionnaires for collecting information on lifetime HT use and breast cancer diagnoses may be a limitation. In addition, the HT route, regimen, and dose were not considered in the analysis, and the effect of intrauterine devices as progestational endometrial protection was not evaluated. Finally, the relationship between HT and breast cancer risk in women with intact ovaries was not evaluated.
BRCA1 carriers who undergo prophylactic oophorectomy may be reluctant to use HT for surgical menopause symptoms due to concerns it might increase their risk of breast cancer
WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
Because women with BRCA1 mutations have an elevated risk of ovarian cancer, risk-reducing gynecologic surgery is recommended for these women who have completed childbearing. In young women, BO without HT is associated with severe vasomotor symptoms, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and cognitive decline. The clear reduction in breast cancer risk associated with ET (vs EPT) following BO suggests that in BRCA1 carriers who have completed childbearing, hysterectomy (which precludes the need for progestogen therapy) should be considered as part of risk-reducing gynecologic surgery. Further, the findings of this prospective study in high-risk women parallels the findings of the large randomized Women's Health Initiative trial (performed in the general population of menopausal women), which found that ET (conjugated equine estrogen) reduces the risk. (1)
ANDREW M. KAUNITZ, MD
Dr. Kaunitz reports receiving grant or research support from Allergan, Bayer, and TherapeuticsMD and that he is a consultant to AMAG and Bayer.
(1.) Manson IE, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women's Health Initiative randomized trials. IAMA. 2013;310(13):1353-1368.
Have you read these related articles?
>> 2018 Update on menopause
Andrew M. Kaunitz MD, NCMP; JoAnn V. Pinkerton, MD, NCMP; and JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH, NCMP (June 2018)
>> Oncofertility in women: Time for a national solution
Lauren E. Ursillo, MD, and Eva Chalas, MD (May 2018)
>> How does oral contraceptive use affect one's risk of ovarian, endometrial, breast, and colorectal cancers?
Dana M. Scott, MD, and Mark D. Pearlman, MD (Examining the Evidence; May 2018)
>> Managing menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors
JoAnn V. Pinkerton, MD (Audiocast; May 2018)
>> Does hormonal contraception increase the risk of breast cancer?
Dana Scott, MD, and Mark D. Pearlman, MD (Commentary; February 2018)
>> Did long-term follow-up of WHI participants reveal any mortality increase among women who received HT?
Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD (Examining the Evidence; November 2017)
>> 2017 Update on menopause
Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD, NCMP; JoAnn V. Pinkerton, MD, NCMP; and JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH, NCMP (June 2017)
>> What to do about the problem of non-FDA approved compounded bioidentical hormones
Cynthia Stuenkel, MD (Audiocast; October 2017)
>> Should risk-reducing gynecologic surgery for BRCA mutation carriers include hysterectomy?
Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD, NCMP (August 2016)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Examining the EVIDENCE|
|Article Type:||Clinical report|
|Date:||Jul 1, 2018|
|Previous Article:||Are we ready for primary HPV testing for the prevention of cervical cancer? We may be at a tipping point where the iconic Pap smear is largely...|
|Next Article:||Human trafficking: How ObGyns can--and should--be helping survivors.|