Do abortions heighten breast cancer risk?
While some right-to-life activists have contended that induced abortions pose a breast cancer threat, previous studies on this topic have been inconclusive.
Janet R. Daling of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and her colleagues decided to take another look at this explosive issue. They describe their findings in the Nov. 2 JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE.
The team interviewed 845 women living in western Washington who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Next, the team randomly recruited 961 women who did not have breast cancer. These women served as a control group. All of the study volunteers had been born after 1944 and thus came of age reproductively after abortion had become legal.
The researchers interviewed the volunteers and took a detailed health history. The team found that women age 45 or younger who had had an induced abortion ran a 50 percent higher risk of developing breast cancer than women in the same age group who had been pregnant at least once but had not obtained an abortion. Furthermore, the team found that the increased cancer threat did not vary with the number of abortions. In addition, a completed pregnancy did not protect women from this elevated risk.
The chances of developing breast cancer appeared greatest for women who reported an induced abortion at age 18 or younger, particularly if it took place after the eighth week of pregnancy or if the patient had a close relative who had been diagnosed with breast cancer.
The team found no increased risk of breast cancer associated with spontaneous abortion.
This isn't the first study to link abortion and breast cancer. More than 10 years ago, Malcolm C. Pike of the University of Southern California School of Medicine in Los Angeles reported that young women who had had an abortion prior to a full-term pregnancy proved more likely to develop breast cancer than women who had not had this procedure.
Pike and other scientists believe that women who complete the physiological changes of pregnancy obtain some protection against breast cancer later in life (SN: 10/31/92, p.298).
Yet the new study's findings don't fit with that theory, points out Lynn Rosenberg of the epidemiology unit at the Boston University School of Medicine in Brookline, Mass. In addition, Daling's team found that breast cancer risk isn't influenced by a woman's pregnancy history, Rosenberg notes.
The new findings also remain at odds with animal research. Scientists know that rats that give birth and later under-go an abortion suffer no heightened breast cancer risk. Researchers believe the changes in breast cells that occur late in pregnancy may help fight off carcinogenic damage, she adds. Rosenberg, who wrote an editorial in the same issue of the journal, urges a cautious approach to Daling's findings.
"This study raises more questions than it answers," she says.
The authors note that a completed pregnancy may not, in itself, protect women. Daling says other studies have indicated that lactation provides a breast cancer shield. Indeed, her study offers support for that hypothesis: An induced abortion did not increase the risk of breast cancer in women who nursed a child within the 5 years following the procedure. Still, the number of women in that category was too small to argue strongly for such an interpretation, Daling adds.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Date:||Nov 5, 1994|
|Previous Article:||Small amounts go down for the count.|
|Next Article:||New dinosaur embryo rewrites history.|