Printer Friendly

Do High Flyers Maintain Their Altitude? Performance Trends of Top Students.

To read the full text of this article, click here: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED524344

This groundbreaking study is the first ever to examine the achievement of high-performing students over time "at the individual level". It poses--and seeks to answer--this straightforward question: Do students who outscore their peers on standardized achievement tests remain at the top of the pack year after year? Put differently, how many "high flyers" maintain their "altitude" over time? How many fall back toward Earth as they make their way through school, losing the academic edge they once enjoyed? Findings include: (1) A majority of high flyers maintained their status over time, but substantial numbers "lost altitude"; (2) Most Descenders don't fall far; and (3) High flyers grew academically at similar rates to low and middle achievers in math, but grew at slightly slower rates than low and middle achievers in reading. Appended are: (1) Methodology; and (2) Methodology Specific to "A Closer Look at High Flyers in High-Poverty Schools." (Contains 9 tables, 7 figures and 14 footnotes.) [Foreword by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Amber M. Winkler, and Janie Scull.]

COPYRIGHT 2011 U.S. Department of Education
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Xiang, Yun; Dahlin, Michael; Cronin, John; Theaker, Robert; Durant, Sarah
Publication:ERIC: Reports
Article Type:Abstract
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2011
Words:250
Previous Article:How High Can Students Think? A Study of Students' Cognitive Levels Using Bloom's Taxonomy in Social Studies.
Next Article:Student Success in Higher Education Is Everybody's Business. Report 11-08.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters