Divergencia genpetica entre genotipos de Spondias mombin (Anacardiaceae) segun caracteres morfologicos.
Brazil ranks third in fresh fruit production in the world, after China and India. However, the country ranks first in tropical fruits production (Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuaria e Abastecimento, 2007). Currently, the international market increasingly demands fruits of new flavors and textures, and Brazil, due to its huge biodiversity and edaphoclimatic conditions, has the potential to provide such natural plant resources (Schwartz, Fachinello, Barbieri, & Silva, 2010).
The genus Spondias holds native fruit species such as "umbutree" (S. tuberosa Arruda), "umbu-caja tree" (Spondias sp.) and "caja tree" (S. mombin L.), which deserve special attention. Caja tree has great socioeconomic importance in the Brazilian Northern and Northeastern regions, since it is one of the most appreciated native fruits commercialized in those places. The local population uses the caja fruit to produce juice, nectar, ice cream, jelly, wine and liqueur, among others (Silva-Junior, Bezerra, Lederman, Alves, & Neto, 2004).
Caja fruit exploitation in Brazil is performed through extraction due to lack of technical domestication knowledge. Studies aiming at characterizing this genetic resource, and its sustainable use, are demanding. Accordingly, agribusiness activities remain fully dependent on the extraction production, which is seasonal and insufficient to the industrial production throughout the year (Martins & Melo, 2006). Thus, the genetic enhancement applied to this fruit species seeks its domestication process and compliance to the consumer market demands, mainly to the quality of the fruit (Braga et al., 2006). However, the genetic variability of the material to be used in the genotype selection must be studied so that the plant breeding programs can be started.
Therefore, the genetic resources must be properly marked to enable promising genetic gains, so their use by farmers can be encouraged (Coelho, Coimbra, Souza, Bogo, & Guidolin, 2007). Currently, the genotype characterization is based on inheritable and measurable morphological markers of easy visualization, which, at first, are expressed in all environments (IPGRI, 1996). Morphological descriptors are useful tools for genetic characterization and enhancement, because they are based on the phenotype, what makes the study easy and cheap (Vieira, 2007). According to Borem (2006), morphological descriptors play a fundamental role in the dissemination of the agronomic traits of new genetic material, and may decisively influence producers' choices. Besides, native species such as Caja [[left arrow] or caja?] are losing their habitat due to intense forest fragmentation in the Amazonian region. Thus, genetic diversity preservation has been the focus of conservation programs concerning the preservation of genes of interest, because such preservation allows the maintenance of the species' variability at genetic level (Alves, Garcia, Cruz, & Figueira, 2003).
The aim of the present study was to assess the genetic divergence between S. mombin genotypes and to quantify the relative contribution from 12 morphological traits of fruits and seeds, as well as to collect data able to support future research on this species' domestication.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area and plant material: The fruit collection was carried out in three counties located in Northern Mato Grosso State: Alta Floresta (09[degrees]52'32" S - 56[degrees]05'10" W), Marcelandia (11[degrees]05'22" S - 54[degrees]27'02" W) and Nova Bandeirante (09[degrees]48'50" S - 57[degrees]51'43" W), in June 2014 (Fig. 1). Genotypes were sampled in different areas of Alta Floresta (individuals from AFL1 to AFL20), Marcelandia (individuals from MAR21 to MAR40), and Nova Bandeirante (individuals from NBA41 to NBA60) counties. In addition, 10 ripe fruits from each genotype were collected, thus totaling 600 fruits.
Each plant produces 60 fruits, on average. The caja tree pollination is of the anemophilous type, based on the flowers' anatomical traits. However, this species flowers are devoid of attractive colors, nectar and of all kinds of possible attractive factors to pollinators (Silva-Junior et al., 2004).
Fruit morphological traits: A total of eight fruit traits were assessed. The fruit length (FL), width (FW), and thickness (FT) were assessed using a digital pachymeter (Starret 799). The fruit mass (FM) was measured in a '0.00001c' g scale (0.01 mm accuracy) and the fruit pulp mass (FPM) was measured by subtracting the seed mass from the fruit mass (FM - SM = FPM). The total soluble solid content (TSS) was directly red in the manual refractometer (Mettler 30 PX); data were corrected through temperature. The fruit volume (FV) resulted from the water volume displaced after fruit immersion in a 100 mL beaker. The fruit pulp was extracted, homogenized and assessed in a potentiometer (Labmeter, PH2)-calibrated at 25[degrees]C- to find the pH values.
Seed morphological traits: Four traits were used to assess the seeds, namely: seed length (SL), width (SW), and thickness (ST), which were measured in a digital pachymeter (Starret 799; at 0.01 mm accuracy). The seed mass (SM) was measured in a '0.00001' g precision scale.
The genotype genetic divergence estimates were found through the standardized mean Euclidean distance method. The generated dissimilarity matrix was used in the grouping analysis, which was performed through the hierarchical UPGMA (Sneath & Sokal, 1973) and the non-hierarchical Tocher optimization methods (Rao, 1952). The grouping validation through the UPGMA method was determined by the cophenetic correlation coefficient (CCC) (Sokal & Rohlf, 1962). The principal component analysis was performed to define the traits that could contribute the most to diversity studies.
The used variables disposal criterion was based on the recommendations by Jolliffe (1972), who suggests that the number of discarded variables should be equal to the number of principal components presenting variance (eigenvalue) lower than 0.7. Khattree and Naik (2000) stated that the variable presenting the highest absolute coefficient value in the principal component -with the lowest eigenvalue (smallest variance)- should be less important to explain the total variance; therefore, such variable would be the one to be discarded. Thus, the discarding process consisted of taking the component corresponding to the lowest eigenvalue into account and of rejecting the variable associated with the highest weight (in absolute value); then, the following lower component has to be assessed. The process must go on until the last component--associated with eigenvalue lower than 0.7--is taken into consideration. Such protocol is followed because the variables highly correlated with the major components--presenting the lowest variances-show virtually insignificant variations.
The data set of each discard was reviewed in order to identify the new highest weight value in the last principal component. The elimination of a trait implies new weight coefficient values to the eigenvectors. It changes the contribution from each trait to the component, so it is worth re-analyzing the set of remaining descriptors. Accordingly, a new dissimilarity array was generated after the discard, in order to investigate possible distortions shown through the Tocher method in the groups (Rao, 1952). The GENES software was used in all statistical analyses (Cruz, 2008).
The descriptive analysis showed genetic divergence among the 60 assessed S. mombin genotypes. The variations in the 12 assessed traits were expressed through the magnitude of the amplitude values (Table 1). The morphological assessment applied to the traits was the instrument used to select the agronomic traits, i.e., the variations indicated the likelihood of genetic enhancement gains.
The assessed S. mombin fruits presented the following dimensions: 21.11 mm to 44.66 mm long, 31.85 mm, on average; width ranging from 13.08 mm to 34.97 mm, 20.55 mm, on average; fruit thickness between 14.45 mm and 29.51 mm, 21.36 mm, on average; mean fruit weight 8.69 g. The average values for fruit volume, pulp mass, total soluble solid content and pH variables showed values 9.95 ml / 6.07 g / 14.29 [degrees]Brix and 3.86, respectively (Table 1).
Four distinct groups were defined after the UPGMA method and the 12 quantitative traits were applied to the 60 S. mombin genotypes (Fig. 2). The MAR32; MAR33; MAR31; MAR35 and MAR40 genotypes were put into group I, which comprised Marcelandia individuals, only. Group II showed the largest number of genotypes (63%) and was composed of individuals from three locations: Alta Floresta (15 individuals), Marcelandia (09 individuals) and Nova Bandeirante (14 individuals). Group III held genotypes from Alta Floresta and Nova Bandeirante, namely: AFL4, AFL5, AFL7, NBA59, NBA60, NBA57, and AFL3. Group IV was the most isolated one and was mostly composed of Marcelandia genotypes (MAR21, MAR34, MAR39, MAR22, MAR38, MAR37, AFL15 and NBA 58) (Fig. 2).
The genetic dissimilarities among the 60 S. mombin genotypes varied from 0.753 to 0.045. The lowest dissimilarity degree happened between genotypes MAR32 and MAR33 (0.045), whereas the most distant genotypes (maximum dissimilarity) were between AFL4 and MAR38 (0.753).
The Tocher optimization method enabled forming ten groups as follows: group I, formed by Marcelandia genotypes, only (MAR32, MAR33, MAR31 and MAR35); group II, composed of 29 genotypes, 48% of the assessed individuals; group III, composed of ten genotypes; group IV, composed of AFL4, AFL5 and AFL7; group V, formed by three new genotypes from Bandeirante; group VI, composed of five genotypes; group VII, composed of individuals AF10, MAR25 and MAR24; and groups VIII, IX and X, formed by genotypes MAR40 NBR41 and MAR37, respectively (Table 2).
The principal component analysis showed that the first three components represented 83.6 % of the total variation, as well as that the first component explained 58.9% of the total variation; and the second one explained 74.9% of it (Table 3).
The eigenvalue and variance rate of 8 of the 12 principal components, presented variances lower than 0.7 (eigenvalue lower than 0.7). According to the criterion by Jolliffe (1972), the low eigenvalue principal components are those able to be discarded. Only the first four components fitting the herein adopted selection criterion were kept in the experiment, because their eigenvalues exceeded 0.7 and explained 90.51% of the total variation.
The seven variables presenting the highest weighting absolute coefficient value in the last principal component were liable to discard (Table 4). The variables showing the possibility to be discarded (Table 4), that were less important to explain the total variation in the present study were: fruit mass, seed width, fruit thickness, fruit volume, fruit length, seed mass, and total soluble solid contents. The lower the eigenvalue of a principal component is, the higher its weight and less its importance. Thus, the important variable in the principal component shall represent low significance in the data set. Although the variable 'fruit mass' has been inserted in the discard list, it deserves attention because it brings important information to the caja tree genotype selection process, and because it is worth to be associated with other attributes such as pulp yield.
On the other hand, the current results suggest that the following variables may be kept: fruit width, pulp weight, pH, seed length and seed thickness. These variables can be used in studies aiming at selecting genotype to develop breeding programs, to conserve species and to identify contrasting genotypes for promising crossings.
The Tocher grouping method and the principal component analysis met the similarity determination among genotypes after ten distinct groups were formed. When the principal component scores were compared to the producer groups, through the Tocher method algorithm, a certain similarity between analyses was noticed, because the group discriminations were similar.
The principal component analysis allowed the identification of redundant variables, i.e., those that had little influence on genotype discrimination. The redundant variable discards allowed the optimization of the original set, thus, after the discard, the data set was reviewed in order to check possible grouping differences.
The absorption presented by the first three principal components showed no significant changes and represented 87% of the total variation after seven variables were discarded. The Tocher method reduced the number of groups from ten to seven (Table 5).
After the variables were discarded, due to the Tocher analysis, 95% of the genotypes were concentrated in group IV; different from the previous analysis applied to group IV, that concentrated 76% of the individuals (Table 5). Groups VI and VII included the same genotype isolates found in groups IX and X in previous analysis; however, the descriptors did not migrate to the main groups. These genotypes were notice to integrate the last analyzed groups, with and without discard.
The MAR37 and NBA41 individuals were different from the others in both analyses, with and without discard, just as it was found through the UPGMA method, which has presented higher divergence than the others.
The fruit length values were close to those found by Cassimiro, Macedo and Menino (2009), who assessed caja trees provided by the Active Germplasm Bank of Emepa-PB: the general average was equal to 34.7 mm, which ranged from 29.5 to 42.0 mm. The mean fruit mass was lower -8.69- but very close to that found by Aldrigue (1988) and Bosco, Soares, Aguiar-Filho and Barros (2000) 10 and 9.5 g, respectively. Pinto et al. (2003) in their study focused on characterizing caja fruit tree genotypes in Bahia State, identified agroindustrial materials of interest for species enhancement and found mean pulp mass 6.11 g, which is close to that found in the present study.
The fruit production for industrial purpose must emphasize fruits with high pulp yield, high sugar content and acidity; however, the lack of production technology is one of the main commercial exploitation barriers (Pinto et al., 2003). The pH also has great influence on food quality and safety, as it indicates the deterioration potential, which is attested by the developed acidity (Gava, 1978).
The traits that greatly contributed to the genetic variability of the studied genotypes were fruit width, pulp weight, pH, and seed width and mass. Therefore, these traits were the most responsive to the genotype selection in the herein studied species.
The Tocher grouping method, which was commonly used in the first groups, focuses on a larger number of genotypes, as shown by in S. mombin, in the current study. This analysis type keeps homogeneity within the groups and heterogeneity among groups. Thus, the largest number of individuals in a given group indicates their great genetic similarity. Individuals framed in the last group presented greater divergence than those in the first group (Elias, Vidigal, Gonela, & Vogt, 2007). In addition, this optimization technique groups the individuals and keeps the criterion used to maintain the intragroup distances often shorter than the intergroup ones (Cruz, Regazzi, & Carneiro, 2004).
According to Capinan (2007), the use of the Tocher grouping method enabled assessing the variability among plants. It is clear in the present study, since the analyses have revealed genetic divergence among the assessed genotypes as in the studies by Viola, Barelli, Salomao, Santos and Ambrozio (2013), who used different Cagaita tree genotypes; and by Lente, Barelli, Ambrozio, Silva and Santos (2013), which assessed 28 Mangaba individuals.
The principal components of the first components associated with the highest eigenvalue showed the largest data variance, what assured their representativeness in the set of assessed variables (Castellen Ledo, Oliveira, MonteiroFilho, & Danta, 2007). The results in the present study were similar to those found by Pinto et al. (2003) in their study about caja tree genotypes, wherein the two first principal components explained 80.9% of the total variation. Godoy et al. (2007), in a study on the genetic diversity of passion fruit genotypes, found 69.07% total variation in the three principal components; such rate is lower than that found in the present study. Junior, Bruckner, Cantin, Sanchez and Cruz (2011) assessed the genetic divergence among 17 peach tree populations and found 80 % variation in the three principal components.
According to Alves et al. (2003), the interest in assessing the relative importance of traits lies on the possibility of withdrawing features of little contribution to the assessed material discrimination, which reduces labor cost, time and experimentation cost. According to Rosse and Fernandes (2002), this criterion is more efficient to identify less informative traits when a set of at least ten traits is taken into account.
There were genetic divergences among the analyzed genotypes. Individuals MAR37 and NBA41 were the most promising for crossings in future programs aiming at genetically enhancing the species and at domesticating it. These two individuals are stored in situ and available for research.
The authors thank FAPEMAT (Project: Conservacao e uso de especies vegetais nativas da regiao Amazonica com potencial economico para regiao Norte do estado de Mato Grosso. Process n. 166159/2014) for its financial support. Bruna Mezzalira da Silva was granted with a Master's Degree scholarship by FAPEMAT/CAPES.
Aldrigue, M. L. (1988). Caracterizacao fisica, quimica e fisico-quimica do caja (Spondias lutea L.). In Seminario Agropecuario do Acre, 1986, Rio Branco. Anais Brasilia: Embrapa-UEPAE de Rio Branco, 323-327.
Alves, R. M., Garcia, A. A. F., Cruz, A. D., & Figueira, A. (2003). Selecao de descritores botanico-agronomicos para caracterizacao de germoplasma de cupuacuzeiro. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 38, 807-818.
Borem, A. (2006). Aplicacao dos marcadores moleculares no melhoramento de plantas. Marcadores Moleculares, Vicosa, UFV, 79-84.
Bosco, J., Soares, K. T., Aguiar-Filho, S. D., & Barros, R. V. (2000). A cultura da cajazeira. Joao Pessoa, Brasil: EMEPA-PB.
Braga, F. M., Dos Santos, E. C., Junqueira, N. T. V., Sousa, A. A. T. C., Faleiro, F. G., Rezende, L. N., & Junqueira, K. P. (2006). Enraizamento de estacas de tres especies silvestres de Passiflora. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 28, 284-288.
Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuaria e Abastecimento, Brasil. (2007). Cadeia produtiva de Frutas. Retrieved from <http://www.ibraf.org.br/x_files/Documentos /Cadeia_Produtiva_de_Frutas_S%C3%A9rie_ Agroneg%C3%B3cios_MAPA.pdf>
Capinan, G. C. S. (2007). Selecao de germoplasma de mangabeira (Hancornia speciosa Gomes) definidos por marcadores morfologicos e moleculares (Masters dissertation). Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Brasil.
Cassimiro, C. M., Macedo, L. S., & Menino, I. B. (2009). Avaliacao de acessos de cajazeira (Spondias mombin) do Banco Ativo de Germoplasma da Emepa, PB. Tecnologia e Ciencia Agropecuaria, 3, 01-06.
Castellen, M. da S., Ledo, C. A. da S., Oliveira, E. J. de, Monteiro-Filho, L. S., & Danta, J. L. L. (2007). Caracterizacao de acessos do banco ativo de germoplasma de mamao por meio de analise multivariada. Magistra, 19, 299-303.
Coelho, C. M. M., Coimbra, J. L. M., Souza, C. A., Bogo, A., & Guidolin, A. F. (2007). Diversidade genetica em acessos de feijao (Phaseolus vulgaris.L.). Ciencia Rural, 37, 1241-1247.
Cruz, C. D. (2008). Programa Genes: aplicativo computacional em genetica e estatistica. Vicosa: Universidade Federal de Vicosa.
Cruz, C. D., Regazzi, A. J., & Carneiro, P. C. S. (2004). Modelos biometricos aplicados ao melhoramento genetico. Vicosa: Universidade Federal de Vicosa.
Elias, H. T., Vidigal, M. C. G., Gonela, A., & Vogt, G. A. (2007). Variabilidade genetica em germoplasma tradicional de feijao preto em Santa Catarina. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 42, 1443-1449.
Gava, A. J. (1978). Principios de tecnologia de alimentos. Sao Paulo, Brasil: Nobel Editora.
Godoy, R. C., Ledo C. A. S., Santos A. P., Matos, E. L. S., Lima A. A., & Waszczynskyj, N. (2007). Diversidade genetica entre acessos de maracujazeiroamarelo avaliada pelas caracteristicas fisico-quimicas dos frutos. Revista Ceres, 54, 541-547.
International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI). (1996). Descriptors for banana (Musa spp.J. Rome, Italy, IPGRI.
Jolliffe, I. T. (1972). Discarding variables in a principal component analysis. I: Artificial data. Applied Statistics, 21, 60-173.
Junior, A. W., Bruckner, C. H., Cantin, C. M., Sanchez, M. A. M., & Cruz, C. D. (2011) Divergencia genetica entre progenies de pessegueiro em Zaragoza, Espanha. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 33(01), 3030-310.
Khattree, R., & Naik, D. N. (2000). Multivariate data reduction and discrimination with SAS software. USA: Sas Institute.
Lente, L. J., Barelli, M. A. A., Ambrozio, V. C., Silva, C. R., & Santos, A. A. B. (2013). Caracterizacao Da Divergencia Genetica da Mangaba (Hancornia speciosa Gomes) Pelo Metodo de Agrupamento De Otimizacao De Tocher. Brasil: Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso.
Martins, S. T., & Melo, B. (2006). Caracteristica do caja. Retrieved from http://www.todafruta.com.br/todafruta/mostra_conteudo.asp
Pinto, W. da S., Dantas, A. C. V. L., Fonseca, A. A. O., Ledo, C. A. da S. L., Jesus, S. C. De, Calafrange, P. L. P., & Andrade, E. M. (2003). Caracterizacao fisica, fisico-quimica e quimica de frutos de genotipos de cajazeira. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 38, 1059-1066.
Rao, C. R. (1952). Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. New York, USA: Jonh Wiley & Sons.
Rosse, L. N., & Fernandes, J. S. C. (2002). Escolha de caracteres para o melhoramento genetico em ervamate por meio de tecnicas multivariadas. Ciencia Florestal, 12, 21-27.
Schwartz, E., Fachinello, J. C., Barbieri, R. L., & Silva, J. B. (2010). Avaliacao de populacoes de Butia Capitata de Santa Vitoria do Palmar. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 32, 736-745.
Silva-Junior, J. F. D., Bezerra, J. E. F., Lederman, I. E., Alves, M. A., & Neto, M. L. D. (2004). Collecting, ex situ conservation and characterization of "cajaumbu" (Spondias mombin x Spondias tuberosa) germplasm in Pernambuco State, Brazil. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 51, 343-349.
Sneath, P. H., & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco, USA: W.H. Freeman.
Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1962). The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon, 97, 33-40.
Vieira, J. (2007). Caracterizacao morfologica e molecular do banco de germoplasma de arroz irrigado (Oryza sativa L.) da Epagri (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brasil.
Viola, M. H., Barelli, M. A. A., Salomao, R. T., Santos, A. A. B., & Ambrozio, V. C. (2013). Caracterizacao Da Divergencia Genetica da Cagaita (Eugenia dysenterica DC.) Pelo Metodo de Agrupamento De Otimizacao De Tocher. Brasil: Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso.
Bruna Mezzalira da Silva (1), Ana Aparecida Bandini Rossi (1,2,3), Juliana de Freitas Encinas Dardengo (2), Poliana Vicente Tiago (3), Greiciele Farias da Silveira (1) & Sergio Alessandro Machado Souza (2,3)
(1.) Genetics and Plant Breeding Major--Mato Grosso State University, Perimetral Rogerio Silva, 78.580-000, Alta Floresta, Mato Grosso, Brazil; email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
(2.) Bionorte Post-Graduation Program, Perimetral Rogerio Silva, 78.580-000, Alta Floresta, Mato Grosso, Brazil; firstname.lastname@example.org
(3.) Biodiversity and Amazon Agroecosystems Major--Mato Grosso State University, Perimetral Rogerio Silva, 78.580-000, Alta Floresta, Mato Grosso, Brazil; email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Received 06-IV-2017. Corrected 21-VII-2017. Accepted 23-VIII-2017.
Leyenda: Fig. 1. Alta Floresta, Marcelandia and Nova Bandeirantes counties located in Southern Amazon, Northern Mato Grosso State, Brazil.
Leyenda: Fig. 2. Analysis of the 60 S. mombin genotypes found through the UPGMA method and through the use of mean Euclidean distance as a genetic distance measure. Cophenetic coefficient correlation (CCC) = 0.6824.
TABLE 1 Descriptive analysis showing the overall averages, standard deviation (SD), minimum, maximum and the range of 12 traits assessed in 60 S. mombin genotypes Variables Mean SD Minimum Maximum Ampleness FL (mm) 31.85 4.10 21.11 44.66 23.55 FW (mm) 20.55 2.88 13.08 34.97 21.89 FT (mm) 21.36 2.76 14.45 29.51 15.06 FV (ml) 9.95 3.42 2.00 21.00 19.00 FWE (g) 8.69 3.05 2.60 18.63 16.03 FPW (g) 6.07 2.51 0.15 15.27 15.12 TSS 14.29 2.81 5.00 22.00 17.00 pH 3.86 0.17 3.42 4.30 0.88 SW (g) 2.62 1.17 0.67 6.29 5.62 SL (mm) 26.52 3.60 13.40 40.03 26.63 SWE (mm) 14.15 2.17 7.12 22.25 15.13 ST (mm) 15.13 2.36 8.62 33.61 24.99 FL: Fruit length (mm), FW: fruit width (mm), FT: fruit thickness (mm), FV: fruit volume (ml), FWE: fruit weight (g), FPW: fruit pulp weight (g), TSS: total soluble solids (Brix), pH: hydrogen potential, SWE: seed weight (g), SL: seed length (mm), SW: seed width (mm) and ST; seed thickness (mm). TABLE 2 Grouping of the 60 S. mombin genotypes through Tocher grouping method using the mean Euclidean distance as a genetic distance measure, this was based on 12 morphological traits Groups Genotypes I MAR32 MAR33 MAR31 MAR35 II MAR27 MAR36 AFL11 AFL6 MAR28 AFL9 AFL19 AFL20 AFL13 NBA47 AFL16 MAR30 NBA50 MAR29 AFL3 AFL2 AFL14 MAR26 AFL1 NBA44 NBA46 NBA48 NBA43 NBA45 MAR23 AFL17 AFL18 AFL8 NBA42 III MAR21 MAR34 MAR39 MAR22 MAR38 NBA58 NBA52 NBA56 AFL15 NBA51 IV AFL4 AFL5 AFL7 V NBA59 NBA60 NBA57 VI NBA49 NBA54 AFL12 NBA53 NBA55 VII AFL10 MAR25 MAR24 VII MAR40 IX NBA41 X MAR37 TABLE 3 Estimates of eigenvalues associated with the principal components and their relative (Root%) and cumulative (%) importance for the 12 morphological traits of S. mombin CP (1) Eigenvalue Relative (%) Accumulated importance (%) [CP.sub.1] 7.07 58.90 58.90 [CP.sub.2] 1.92 16.03 74.93 [CP.sub.3] 1.04 8.70 83.63 [CP.sub.4] 0.83 6.88 90.51 [CP.sub.5] 0.60 5.03 95.54 [CP.sub.6] 0.34 2.86 98.40 [CP.sub.7] 0.09 0.76 99.16 [CP.sub.8] 0.04 0.33 99.50 [CP.sub.9] 0.03 0.24 99.74 [CP.sub.10] 0.02 0.15 99.89 [CP.sub.11] 0.01 0.11 100.00 [CP.sub.12] 0.00 0.00 100.00 (1) Each principal component is a linear combination between the eighteen standardized variables. TABLE 4 Set of eigenvectors (weighting) explained by the principal components (PCi) of the 12 variables in S. mombin [PC.sub.i] Associated eigenvector elements FL FW FT LV WEF FPW TSS [PC.sub.1] 0.31 0.34 0.35 0.34 0.36 0.30 -0.22 [PC.sub.2] -0.33 0.04 0.00 -0.23 -0.20 -0.39 -0.21 [PC.sub.3] 0.13 -0.21 -0.22 -0.07 0.01 -0.06 -0.36 [PC.sub.4] 0.32 -0.34 -0.31 -0.13 -0.07 -0.17 -0.02 [PC.sub.5] 0.04 0.06 0.00 -0.12 0.00 0.06 0.81 [PC.sub.6] -0.03 -0.01 0.01 0.29 0.05 -0.31 0.34 [PC.sub.7] * -0.15 -0.50 -0.35 0.60 0.13 0.21 0.03 [PC.sub.8] -0.59 -0.24 0.06 -0.34 0.42 0.40 0.01 [PC.sub.9] 0.41 -0.30 0.17 -0.44 0.19 0.15 0.05 [PC.sub.10] -0.22 -0.36 0.70 0.20 -0.21 -0.20 -0.03 [PC.sub.11] -0.30 0.44 -0.29 0.01 0.03 0.02 -0.03 [PC.sub.12] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.74 0.60 0.00 [PC.sub.i] Associated eigenvector elements pH SWE SL SW ST [PC.sub.1] 0.11 0.29 0.27 0.26 0.24 [PC.sub.2] 0.12 0.29 -0.13 0.48 0.51 [PC.sub.3] 0.81 0.14 0.12 -0.18 -0.19 [PC.sub.4] -0.34 0.17 0.69 0.08 0.09 [PC.sub.5] 0.44 -0.11 0.23 0.18 0.20 [PC.sub.6] -0.05 0.76 -0.16 -0.19 -0.23 [PC.sub.7] * 0.02 -0.09 -0.18 0.08 0.37 [PC.sub.8] -0.06 0.24 0.19 0.07 -0.19 [PC.sub.9] -0.05 0.17 -0.37 -0.32 0.43 [PC.sub.10] 0.08 -0.12 0.29 -0.29 0.14 [PC.sub.11] -0.02 0.04 0.23 -0.63 0.43 [PC.sub.12] 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 FL: fruit length (mm), FW: fruit width (mm), FT: fruit thickness (mm), FV: fruit volume (ml), FWE: fruit weight (g), FPW: fruit pulp weight (g), TSS: total soluble solids (Brix), pH: hydrogen potential, SWE: seed weight (g), SL: seed length (mm), SW: seed width (mm) and ST: seed thickness (mm). * There was no disposal suggestion in the seventh principal component, since the highest rate is susceptible to the discard of the ninth component. TABLE 5 Grouping of the 60 Spondia mombin genotypes through the Tocher grouping method, by using the mean Euclidean distance as genetic distance measure, based on the 05 most important morphological traits Groups Genotypes I MAR32 MAR33 MAR31 MAR35 NBA48 NBA44 AFL16 MAR26 NBA45 NBA46 NBA43 AFL2 AFL9 AFL19 MAR23 MAR30 NBA42 AFL18 AFL14 AFL1 MAR28 AFL8 AFL17 NBA47 AFL6 AFL13 AFL20 AFL11 AFL3 MAR24 22 MAR40 MAR25 AFL12 NBA54 NBA56 NBA50 II MAR27 MAR36 MAR29 AFL7 NBA57 NBA60 NBA59 AFL4 AFL5 III NBA51 NBA53 NBA52 NBA55 AFL10 NBA49 IV MAR34 MAR39 MAR21 MAR38 NBA58 V AFL15 VI MAR37 VII NBA41