# Diseno y simulacion de un acelerometro con respuesta de sensibilidad mejorada.

Design and simulation of an accelerometer with improved sensitivity response1. Introduction

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) are integrated devices that combine both electrical and mechanical components. Their size ranges from micrometers to a few millimeters (MEMS Research Center, 1999). Their most common applications include: accelerometers, sensors of pressure, chemical sensors, flow sensors, as well as optical scanners and pumps of flow.

The MEMS are widely used for measurement of inertia in the automotive market, using many principles of signal transduction for their operation; among them, the capacitive detection, (Comi, 2016).

The microaccelerometers are devices that stand out due to their high sensitivity of displacement and operation frequency (Jing, 2015). Among of their applications, they can be used in touch screens, where with the processing of an input touch, for the selection of the desired object, information is received indicating the orientation or movement of the screen. (Patent US2016041755, 2016). Accelerometers are also used for systems of monitoring, which can include also optical fibers (Antunes, 2012). In order to perform ultrasensitive MEM systems, all the elements are integrated in a single chip, also to reduce the 1/f noise, as shown in (US Patent, 2003).

On the other hand, it is important to mention that in the bibliography there are works in which modifications are made in the geometry of the accelerometers, both in their mass (US Patent, 2011) and in the form of suspension beams. In (Patent US2016041199, 2016), E-shaped beams are presented.

The sensitivity of displacement is defined as the displacement of the moving mass per unit of gravitational acceleration g (Benmessaoud & Danskin-Nasreddine, 2013). For such sensitivity, it is necessary to starting from Newton's second law that establishes that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force, that acts on it and inversely proportional to its mass, and it is represented by Eq. (1).

F = ma (1)

Where F is the net force, m is the mass of the system and a is the acceleration.

Suspension beams, connected to the mobile mass, are affected by the inertia of the mass, when they are opposed to the movement, so their length is changed. Beams become deformed as a result of the sense of acceleration. This deformation is proportional to the force that causes it. Thus, the relationship between the movement of beams and the force acting directly or indirectly on them according to Hooke's law, is expressed by Eq. (2).

F = kx (2)

Where x is the displacement and k is the stiffness constant or constant of the spring, which is obtained by Eq. (3):

k = Et[([w.sub.b]/[l.sub.b]).sup.3]

E is the Young's modulus of the material, t, wb and lb are the thickness, width and length of the suspension beams, respectively.

The Eq. (4) shows the equality of Eq. (1) and Eq. (2).

ma = kx (4)

In order to obtain the sensitivity of displacement, it is necessary to use x from Eq. (4), as it can be appreciated in Eq. (5).

X = m*a/k (5)

It should be noted that the mechanical sensitivity has a similar expression (Cruz-Acero, 2010), being only [s.sub.m] = m/k. The expression for the sensitivity of displacement calculation, here developed, considers the effect of acceleration and allows us to get very close values to those obtained through simulation.

Displacement sensitivity will remain constant within a frequency range before any resonance frequency (Khan, 2013). This happens since, as it is widely known, before the resonance frequency, the device will operate according to the design conditions, under those it is was developed. So, it is recommended to design at high operation frequencies.

For these reasons, in this work an improvement on the sensitivity of displacement is presented. However, the frequency of operation is low. This determine the future work, where amplifiers of displacement will be implemented that favor the sensitivity, minimizing the effect exerted by the operation frequency on it.

To obtain the operation frequency of an accelerometer, Eq. (6) is used (Jianbing, 2013).

f = 1/2[pi] [raiz cuadrada de ([Etw.sub.b.sup.3]/[ml.sub.b.sup.3])] (6)

2. Theoretical analysis of a capacitive accelerometer

Accelerometers are devices used to measure acceleration and vibration. These devices transform the acceleration of gravity or movement into an electrical analogue signal, proportional to the force applied to the system (Manzanares, 2008). Figure 1 shows the main elements of a conventional rectangular accelerometer.

The purpose of this work, additional to the proposal of a geometry that enhances the sensitivity of a capacitive accelerometer, is to validate the theoretical results way with those obtained by the use of Ansys software, which makes modeling by finite element method.

Figure 2 shows the dimensions of the used capacitive accelerometer and Table 1 shows the properties of Silicon.

For the calculation of sensitivity of displacement and frequency, Eqs. (5) and (6) were employed, respectively. The calculated values are shown in Table 2.

3. Simulation and results of a capacitive accelerometer

In simulations, 1 g (9.81 m/s2) is applied, in order to validate the values calculated in section 1 (Table 2). Figures 3 and 4 show the sensitivity of the in plane displacement, as well as the frequency that corresponds to this vibration mode, respectively.

Table 3 shows a comparison of theoretical and simulated results, corresponding to the in plane movement.

From the results obtained through simulation, the sensitivity of in plane displacement has a percentage error of 2.7 and in the case of the frequency, the percentage error is 0.9, with respect to the analytical results.

4. Geometry proposal for the sensitivity improvement

4.1 Theoretical analysis of the accelerometer extended beams

After the comparison of the analytical and simulated results of the conventional capacitive accelerometer, some modifications to its geometry, are proposed in orderto improve the sensitivity ofin plane displacement, based on a lengthening of the beams which at the same time, causes modifications in the form of the mass.

Figure 5 shows the sensitivity of the in plane displacement response and the frequency of the movement, of the accelerometer with extended beams.

In Table 4, the results of sensitivity and frequency analytical and simulation calculations, as well of the in plane displacement are shown, under as the length of the suspension beams.

In Figure 5, changes in the geometry of the mass and in the form of suspension beams can be observed. The sizes of the suspension beams increase by 0.5 mm in each case, from 2 up to 4.5 mm. It can be seen that as beam length increases, the sensitivity of displacement also increases. However, the frequency of displacement in plane decreases. This fact is due to the commitment with the increasing of the sizes of the suspension beam.

4.2 Simulation results of the accelerometer of extended beams

Due to the bigger sensitivity of displacement, the accelerometer of Figure 5e was chosen. Its sizes are shown in Figure 6.

Outcomes through simulation in the case of sensitivity, a percentage error of 0.3 was gotten. For the case of the frequency, the percentage error is 0.04, with respect to the calculated results.

From table 5, it can be seen that the sensitivity of the in plane displacement for the case of chosen accelerometer, is approximately 10 times greater than in the case of the conventional one, but in the case of the frequency, the answer is 3 times less. This can be explained by the equations analyzed in this work, showing that there is a direct proportionality between the length of the suspension beams and the sensitivity of displacement. In addition, there is an inversely proportional relationship between the reduction in the mass and the frequency, which corresponds to the displacement in plane. The direct and inverse proportionality constants are 2.4 and 48, respectively.

In addition, the shape of suspension beams was modified (Figure 7). As a result, an improvement in the sensitivity of displacement was obtained (Table 5).

With the accelerometer with one end of the coilshaped suspension beams, the sensitivity increases 19% with respect to the chosen accelerometer of extended beams. It is important to mention, that the results obtained analytically are not very close to those obtained through simulation. This is because these equations are used for straight suspension beams, and they do not apply to the form displayed in this accelerometer. So, it is required to adapt it.

Khan & Ananthasuresh (2014) reported a sensitivity value of displacement of 0.102 (m/g, with approximate sizes of 2 mm x 6 mm for the mass area and length of beams of 1.5 mm. They presented a very complete analysis that we employed as a basis for the development of our accelerometers, in principle in the same sizes, in order to compare our results. Later, the accelerometers with the proposed sizes and modifications were developed.

5. Conclusions

From the analysis of the equations for in plane sensitivity and frequency calculations, the accelerometer of extended beams was proposed. With it, the sensitivity is increased by approximately 10 times, compared with a conventional capacitive accelerometer. However, the frequency of displacement response decreases by 68%. The implementation of displacement amplifiers could reduce the dependence of sensitivity with respect to the frequency of displacement in plane.

The simulation results with respect to the values obtained analytically with the developed expression, are closest to the case of the accelerometer of extended beams, providing a percentage error of 0.3 for the sensitivity and 0.04 for the frequency shift, compared with the case of the conventional capacitive accelerometer.

Due to the sensitivity of displacement for the accelerometer of extended beams, this device can be useful for industrial applications requiring a low g, such as monitoring of or seismic vibrations, among others.

For the coil-shape beams, a bigger sensitivity of displacement (19% compared to the one with extended beams) was observed in the corresponding simulations. The equations used in the case of the linear shape beams requires an adaptation in order to be applied to other geometry of the beams.

6. References

Antunes, P., Travanca, R., Rodrigues, H., Melo, J., Jara, J., Varum, H. & Andre, P. (2012). Dynamic structural health monitoring of slender structures using optical sensors. Sensors 12 (5), 6629-6644.

Benmessaoud, M. & Maaza-Nasreddine, M. (2013). Optimization of MEMS capacitive accelerometer. Microsys Technol 19 (5), 713-720.

Comi, C., Corigliano, A., Langfelder, G., Zega, V. & Zerbini, S. (2016). Sensitivity and temperature behavior of a novel z-axis differential resonant micro accelerometer. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 26 (3), 11.

Cruz-Acero, M., Esteve, J., Plaza, J.A. & Lora-Tamayo, E. (2010). Microtecnologia: diario de un proceso. Fabricacion de un microacelerometro. Madrid: CSIC.

ANSYS (2015) Ansys- Simulation Driven Product Development. http://www.ansys.com/

Jianbing, X., Meng, S. & Weizheng, Y. (2013). A high sensitivity micromachined accelerometer with an enhanced inertial mass SOI MEMS process. In proceedings Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS), 2013 8th IEEE International Conference on Suzhou, China, p. 336-339.

Jing, Z., Yan, S., Qin, S. & An-Ping Q. (2015). Microelectromechanical Resonant Accelerometer Designed with a High Sensitivity. Sensors 15 (12), 30293-30310.

Khan, S. & Ananthasuresh, G.K. (2014). Improving the Sensivity and Bandwith of In- Plane Capacitive Microaccelerometers Using Compliant Mechanical Amplifiers. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 23 (4), 871-887.

Khan, S. (2013) Development of Micromachined and Meso-scale Multi-axis Accelerometers with Displacement-amplifying Compliant Mechanisms. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.

Manzanares, A. (2008). Estudio de modelos matematicos de acelerometros comerciales, Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Espana.

Patent, No. US2016041755, Feb, 11, 2016.

Patent, No. US2016041199, Feb, 11, 2016.

United States Patent, Patent No.: US 6, 581,465 B1, Jun. 24, 2003.

United States Patent, Patent No.: US 8, 079,262 B2, Dec. 20, 2011.

Wisconsin Center for Applied Microelectronics at UW-Madison (1999) MEMS Research Center Faculty of Engineering, University of Wisconsin. http://wcam.engr.wisc.edu/ [Consultado: Septiembre, 2015].

Margarita Tecpoyotl-Torres * ([seccion]), Ramon Cabello-Ruiz *, Pedro Vargas-Chable *, Said Robles-Casolco *, Jose G. Vera-Dimas **

* Instituto de Investigacion en Ciencias Basicas y Aplicadas (IICBA), Centro de Investigacion en Ingenieria y Ciencias Aplicadas-CIICAp, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos. Morelos, Mexico.

** Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas e Ingenierias, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos. Morelos, Mexico.

([seccion]) tecpoyotl@uaem.mx, ramon.cabello@uaem.mx, said.robles@uaem.mx, gvera@uaem.mx, pedro.vargas@uaem.mx

(Recibido: Noviembre 25 de 2015 - Aceptado: Febrero 22 de 2016)

Caption: Figure 1. Main elements of an accelerometer.

Caption: Figure 2. Sizes of the capacitive accelerometer.

Caption: Figure 3. Sensitivity of the in plane displacement response of conventional accelerometer.

Caption: Figure 4. Frequency corresponding to the in plane displacement of the conventional accelerometer

Caption: Figure 5. Sensitivity and frequency response of the in plane displacement of the accelerometer with extended beams with several length beams.

Caption: Figure 6. Sizes of the accelerometer with expanded beams.

Caption: Figure 7. Sensitivity and frequency response of in plane displacement of the accelerometer with suspension coil-shaped beams.

Table 1. Properties of Silicon, (Ansys, 2015). Property Value Density ([rho]), in Kg/[m.sup.3] 2330 Thermal Expansion coefficient 2.6 x [10.sup.-6] ([alfa]), 1 / [grados]C Young's modulus (E), in GPa 131 Poisson ratio, dimensionless 0.33 Table 2. Values of calculated parameters of conventional accelerometer. Parameter Value Sensitivity of 1.09 [micron]m/g displacement, x Frequency, f 475.35 Hz Table 3. Comparison of results obtained for the conventional accelerometer. Sensitivity Sensitivity Frequency Frequency of in plane of in plane of in plane of in plane displacement displacement displacement displacement (calculated) (simulated) (calculated) (simulated) 1.09 [micron]m/g 1.12 [micron]m/g 475.35 Hz 471.11 Hz Table 4. Comparison of obtained results. Figure Length of Sensitivity Sensitivity suspension of in plane of in plane beams displacement displacement (calculated) (simulated) 5a 2.5 mm 2.08 [micron]m/g 2.12 [micron]m/g 5b 3 mm 3.50 [micron]m/g 3.53 [micron]m/g 5c 3.5 mm 5.39 [micron]m/g 5.41 [micron]m/g 5d 4 mm 7.79 [micron]m/g 7.81 [micron]m/g 5e 4.5 mm 10.74 [micron]m/g 10.77 [micron]m/g Figure Frequency Frequency of in plane of in plane displacement displacement (calculated) (simulated) 5a 345.07 Hz 342.45 Hz 5b 266.43 Hz 265.2 Hz 5c 214.69 Hz 214.24 Hz 5d 178.52 Hz 178.44 Hz 5e 152.06 Hz 152 Hz Table 5. Comparison of results of the accelerometer with suspension coil-shaped beams. Length of Sensitivity Sensitivity Frequency Frequency suspen- of in plane of in plane of in plane of in plane sion displacement displacement displacement displacement beams (calculated) (simulated) (calculated) (simulated) 4.5 mm 10.84 12.86 151.35 Hz 139.13 Hz [micron]/g [micron]/g

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Title Annotation: | INGENIERIA MECANICA |
---|---|

Author: | Tecpoyotl-Torres, Margarita; Cabello-Ruiz, Ramon; Vargas-Chable, Pedro; Robles-Casolco, Said; Vera-D |

Publication: | Ingenieria y Competividad |

Date: | Dec 1, 2016 |

Words: | 2505 |

Previous Article: | Obtencion de ceramicos a base de caolin mediante el proceso de Freeze casting. |

Next Article: | Compuestos de fibra de hoja de pina fabricados mediante moldeo por compresion por capas. |

Topics: |