Dietary sources of vitamin D, not sun, advised by AAD.
The update comes in response to the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) recent review of existing data on possible roles for vitamin D status in certain types of cancers, and neurologic, infectious, autoimmune, and cardiovascular diseases. In the report, the IOM called existing evidence "inconsistent, inconclusive as to causality, and insufficient to inform nutritional requirement." However, the organization found that the evidence does support a role for vitamin D in bone health.
"The IOM's review of the scientific evidence about vitamin D supports the academy's long-standing recommendation on safe ways to get this important vitamin - through a healthy diet which incorporates foods naturally rich in vitamin D, vitamin D - fortified foods and beverages, and vitamin D supplements," AAD president William D. James noted in a statement.
In particular, the statement reinforces the idea that unprotected UV exposure to the sun or indoor tanning devices is a known risk factor for the development of skin cancer. There is no scientifically validated, safe threshold level of UV exposure from the sun or indoor tanning devices that allows for maximal vitamin D synthesis without increasing skin cancer risk.
The statement also includes new IOM Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) for calcium and vitamin D intake. Of note, these age-based values were derived assuming minimal or no sun exposure, given inconsistent contributions of sunlight to vitamin D in the population and also because of the risk of cancer associated with sun exposure.
Adequate vitamin D was defined by the IOM as blood levels of at least 20 ng/mL as measured in the United States (50 nmol/L as measured in Canada).
Physicians should discuss options for obtaining sufficient dietary or supplementary sources of vitamin D with patients having concerned about their vitamin D levels.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Internal Medicine News|
|Date:||Feb 1, 2011|
|Previous Article:||Osteoporosis screening not supported for men: in older women, take into account data showing that treatment benefit takes 18-24 months.|
|Next Article:||Liver injury with dronedarone.|