Did Fed Give Trump, Sanders The Edge?
Axel Merk issued his thoughts on the Federal Reserve ahead of Chair Janet Yellen's testimony before Congress early Wednesday, when she hinted at a change of heart over plans for multiple interest rate hikes in 2016.
Merk, the president of Merk Investments who is bullish on gold, is critical of the Fed's thinking in light of former Chair Alan Greenspan's heavy emphasis on the "wealth effect," the idea that rising asset prices are beneficial to investment and economic growth.
THe next Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, "went as far as mentioning in FOMC minutes rising equity prices as a beneficial side effect of quantitative easing," Merk says. In addition, when inflation expectations would drop toward 2%, Bernanke would talk about the need for QE.
As economists, investment analysts and others look at ways to improve the U.S. economy, Merk suggests that the Fed's short-term thinking, its quantitative easing and its tacit approval of rising asset prices may have created conditions that support populist politicians such as Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, who won the Republican and Democratic primary elections, respectively, in New Hampshire on Tuesday.
Monetary policy is no answer to economic woes. "You cannot print your way to prosperity. That path risks destroying purchasing power and a destruction of the middle class," he said. "The result may be public resentment, the rise of populist politicians and reduced political stability, even war."
As he said in 2008, "The best short-term policy is a good long-term policy Based on my analysis, the answer must be in monetary or fiscal policy to make debt sustainable as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)."
As for greater fiscal spending, a move advocated by Janus Capital's Bill Gross and hedge fund manager Ray Dalio, it can be argued that a huge amount of spending -- at levels usually seen in wars -- can break the deflationary cycle, according to Merk: "That's what we got after the Great Depression, and I don't look forward to a repeat."
The portfolio managers sees the extension of printing money as a form of default. "Some debt will need to be restructured, and indeed, I believe much of the work in the eurozone has been to get the financial system strong enough to stomach a sovereign default," he stated.
Second, fiscal policy can also entail austerity. "It works for Germany, but not for Greece. In Greece and many other countries, it causes popular backlash that can destabilize a country," Merk said.
But, the better way out could be fiscal policy that is both expansionary and sustainable.
"Fiscally sustainable policies are long-term pro-growth strategies that don't themselves blow up the debt," he stated.
This entails entitlement reform, on the one hand, to make deficits sustainable and cutting of red tape to unleash growth. "Over the past 15 years, I believe red tape has increased rather dramatically in many sectors, inhibiting growth," Merk explained.
He isn't overly optimistic on such shifts: Policymakers "are unlikely to pursue what I believe is necessary," and this means investors and advisors must cope "with the cards we are dealt."
Yellen has pointed to surveys that show long-term inflation trends "remain well anchored," he adds. But Merk adds that Yellen, as a labor economist, is "destined to look at stale data, as jobs data tend to be backward looking."
Hence, the Fed "may well be clueless," according to Merk, since it is essentially saying "the balance to risks needs further assessment and no longer has a view of where we are in the economy."
In other words, the Fed looks more like "a huge ocean tanker that's slow to move," according to Merk. While this is "not a bad thing per se," it should be understood in the context of how the markets will behave, he adds.
Fed & The Markets
Asset prices have risen in against a backdrop of low volatility, which was "induced by highly accommodative monetary policy," Merk notes. "I like to refer to it as an era of 'compressed risk premia.'"
In such a market environment, investors get "overexposed to risky assets," according to the gold bug. As the Fed starts thinking about a change in policy, the market throws a "taper tantrum."
The Fed then moves further along or diverts from its stated path, and the markets get shaken up, as they've done since August. This then wakes investors "up to the notion that markets are risky after all and that they must sell risky assets (equities, junk bonds, amongst others) to rebalance their portfolios," he explains.
"As a result, investors may be increasingly interested in capital preservation, i.e. 'sell the rallies' rather than 'buy the dips,' " added Merk.
The current Fed-market dynamics, he explains, seem to indicate that market forces "are taking the upper hand -- for now."
This could be positive for those who short "risk assets" (mainly equities), since "as the steam is released from the pressure cooker, asset prices may deflate once again," Merk stated. "It's the sort of scenario Bernanke might be terrified about, as the 'progress' of QE may be undone."
But Yellen's Fed may focus more on the labor market.
"That's all well and good, except that the recovery was, in our assessment, largely based on asset price inflation. As such, when asset prices plunge, it also provides a headwind to the real economy," Merck said.
The selling of risk assets could end when most investors have shifted toward a capital preservation mode, he adds. "This won't be a straight line, as bear markets can have violent rallies. And not only will the [Bank of Japan] and [European Central Bank] not sit idle on the sidelines, but ripple effects may go through the markets as the Fed is gradually coming to grips with reality."
--- Check out Merk Asks: Could Gold Beat Stocks? on ThinkAdvisor.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Date:||Feb 10, 2016|
|Previous Article:||Is Yellen Prepping for Rate Cut or Saying CyNothing Alarmist'?|
|Next Article:||Amid Volatility, Portfolio Management Is Top Advisor Concern: Fidelity.|