Printer Friendly

Diagnostic tests for common STDs and HSV-2.



To earn CEUs, see test on page 22.


Upon completion of this article the reader will be able to:

1. Identify the most important standard test for common sexually transmitted infections.

2. Identify new tests for common sexually transmitted infections.

3. Discuss the use of these tests to address management and control of these infections.

Herpes capsid images courtesy of Hong Zhou, Ph.D., University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Recent years have witnessed steady levels of most sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), along with a significant resurgence in syphilis cases. (1,2) At the same time, diagnostic tests for STDs have increased in number and diversity. This article summarizes the most important standard tests for common sexually transmitted infections in adults, highlighting newer tests designed to address challenges in management and control of these infections.

Since infection with one STD is a marker of risk for contracting others, familiarity with the diagnostic modalities available for all such infections is important. Diagnostic testing is a critical tool for stemming spread of new infections. The invasiveness of diagnostic tests, their ease of use, ability to conduct them in alternative clinical and nonclinical settings, timing of results, and cost are important test factors that contribute to effective disease control. In some instances, newer diagnostic tests have replaced more labor-intensive and/or costlier techniques, such as bacterial culture and older assays necessitating daily preparation of reagents, nondisposable hardware, and intensively skilled staff for results interpretation. Increasingly, testing for STDs is conducted when and where the patient presents, such as in pre-natal and STD clinics. Such point-of-care testing minimizes mistreatment based on clinical diagnosis alone and addresses public health imperatives to recognize and treat STDs early, blunting further disease transmission.


Infection caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum (TP) is diagnosed by direct examination of suspicious lesion material and conventional serologic tests for syphilis. The organism cannot be cultured routinely, and the gold-standard rabbit infectivity test is impractical to perform. The selection and timing of serologic tests is integral to recognition and appropriate management of syphilis and necessitates an understanding of the natural history of the disease. The emergence of rapid tests for syphilis offers promise for timelier identification, treatment, and interrupted spread of this infection, which is a significant cofactor in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) susceptibility and transmission. (3)


Roughly one-third of individuals sexually exposed to a person with syphilis will become infected. (4) After exposure and incubation, the primary stage ensues with one or more typically painless ulcers (chancres) developing at the site of exposure, usually on the genitals or anus, with or without regional lymph-node enlargement. Such symptoms may appear within several days of exposure (mean, 21 days; range, 14 to 90 days). The chancre then resolves, even without treatment, in one to five weeks. (4,5) In the secondary stage, symptoms typically include mucosal lesions and rashes that may cover the palms and soles. Constitutional symptoms (e.g., sore throat, low-grade fever, malaise, muscle and joint aches, enlarged lymph nodes) also may be present. Less common symptoms and signs include oral mucous patches, condylomata lata (moist, wart-like papules occurring mostly in skin folds), and hair loss.

In latent syphilis, serologic evidence of infection is found despite absence of symptoms and signs of the primary and secondary (P & S) stages. Early latent syphilis is defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as infection less than 12 months in duration. (6) Without evidence of acquisition in the prior year, infection is referred to as syphilis of unknown duration. During the early latent phase, relapses with secondary stage symptoms may occur.

Tertiary syphilis describes disease presenting with late manifestations, encompassing cardiovascular features such as aortitis with aneurysm formation, late neurologic sequelae, and formation of gummas (indolent, destructive lesions occurring in any organ but chiefly involving skin, bone, and liver). Late-stage manifestations may occur in one-third of untreated cases, and as long as 10 to 20 years after infection. Neurosyphilis, or central nervous system involvement by TP, is not a stage but rather a site of infection, where symptoms may manifest either earlier or later in the course of infection and may involve the visual and auditory systems prominently.

Direct testing of clinical specimens. TP may be detected using specimens collected noninvasively from skin and mucosal lesions suspicious for P & S syphilis using dark-field microscopy, with sensitivity of 75% to 80%, depending on specimen adequacy. (7) TP-specific staining of histologic specimens may also be performed, but sensitivity is diminished if concentration of treponemes is low. In clinical settings equipped with a dark-field microscope, the clinician may scrape the suspected syphilis lesion with a glass slide to prepare a wet mount for immediate examination. Identification of motile, corkscrew-shaped organisms appearing fluorescent green supports the diagnosis of syphilis. Specimens from oral lesions should not be examined using dark-field microscopy, as saprophytic, nonpathogenic treponemes may cause a false-positive result for TP.

Many clinics do not have dark-field microscopes and/or adequately trained staff to operate them. In these instances, smears from suspected syphilis lesions may be collected and submitted to the laboratory for fixation and immunostaining by the direct fluorescent antibody to TP (DFA-TP) method, which uses a fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled globulin to detect TP antigen. Unlike direct dark-field examination, the DFA-TP employs a TP-specific conjugate; thus, specimens collected from oral lesions may be tested by this method. Sensitivity and specificity of DFA-TP approximate 100% using properly prepared specimens. (8)

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for genital ulcer disease, or GUD, has been developed that simultaneously detects TP, Haemophilus ducreyi (the etiologic agent of chancroid), and herpes simplex virus (HSV) in ulcer material (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Basel, Switzerland). While its sensitivity for TP is excellent, approximating 95%, there are no plans to market this test in the United States. (9)

Serologic testing for syphilis. Routinely employed to diagnose and monitor treated syphilis are nontreponemal assays that use cardiolipin-, lecithin-, and cholesterol-containing antigen to measure antilipoidal IgM and IgG antibodies. The two most common such tests are the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) card and venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) slide tests. By contrast, treponemal tests utilize antigen from TP or its components and often are used to confirm the results of nontreponemal tests in a two-step, reflex process. Treponemal tests include the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-Abs) test, the Serodia TP particle agglutination (TP-PA) test (Fujirebio America Inc., Fairfield, NJ), and its manufacturer's predecessor test, the microhemagglutination assay for antibodies to TP, or MHA-TP. The FTA-Abs requires a fluorescent microscope to detect adherence of the patient's serum antibody to TP antigen fixed to a slide. By contrast, the TP-PA is an agglutination assay using colored gelatin particle carriers sensitized with TP antigen.

Nontreponemal tests may be performed qualitatively or quantitatively, the latter enabling the clinician to follow serologic response to treatment. For quantitative tests, serum is diluted in a serial twofold fashion, and the last dilution in which the specimen is fully reactive is reported. Of significance to the laboratorian, the VDRL test requires daily preparation of an antigen suspension and use of reusable slides, whereas the RPR card test utilizes disposable plastic-coated cards. (8) Given variation in antigen preparation among the commonly available nontreponemal tests, reactivity level is variable and, therefore, the tests cannot be interchanged in monitoring response to treatment.

Sensitivity of serologic tests. The sensitivity of both nontreponemal and treponemal tests varies with stage of infection. The sensitivity of nontreponemal tests increases with duration of infection, and ranges from approximately 75% to 85% in the primary stage to virtually 100% in the secondary stage. (10) Humoral antibodies typically are detectable one to four weeks after chancre formation. Since the sensitivity of nontreponemal tests is lower in the primary stage, a negative nontreponemal test in an individual with a genital lesion cannot exclude primary syphilis. In such patients, direct laboratory examination of suspicious lesions should be sought.

The sensitivity of treponemal tests continues to approximate 100% in late syphilis, in contrast to nontreponemal tests, which are more practical and cost-effective for initial screening but have diminished sensitivity in late syphilis. Despite the higher sensitivity of treponemal tests, data supporting their use for initial screening are limited. Nonetheless, it may be useful to employ both a nontreponemal and (nonreflexed) treponemal test to identify newly infected persons with suspicious lesions. For instance, in a recent evaluation of 39 dark-field confirmed syphilis cases, VDRL was reactive in 30 (77%) whereas TP-PA was positive in 37 (95%). Using a strategy of initially obtaining both VDRL and TP-PA would have identified 100% of cases, compared to only 72% of cases using a conventional reflex strategy. (11)

Of special significance in the laboratory, the prozone phenomenon may lead to false-negative serologic test results, more often during the secondary stage. This reaction occurs when a high concentration of treponemal antigen does not permit detectable antigen-antibody complex formation. It may be overcome by dilution of the specimen. Clinicians should be reminded of the need to request specimen dilution in highly suspicious cases in which serologic tests are nonreactive. Finally, temperature of the laboratory (<73[degrees]F) may also contribute to false-negative nontreponemal test results. (12)

Specificity of serologic tests. Syphilis test specificity is a function of the test used and the population tested. False-positive nontreponemal results are known to occur in the setting of coexisting infection, autoimmune disease, and drug use, among other conditions. In the general population, false-positive results may occur at a rate of 1% to 2%. (8) In HIV-infected persons, nonspecific polyclonal B-cell activation may lead to false-positive nontreponemal results or higher test titers than in those uninfected with HIV. (13,14) While many have observed that biologic false-positive nontreponemal test titers typically are less than 1:8, such low titers may also occur in latent syphilis. From a public health perspective, positive nontreponemal tests, particularly with titers greater than 1:8, should be interpreted as indicating active infection, with interval testing to assess delayed seroreactivity of the confirmatory test.

False-positive treponemal test results also occur in the general population, though at a lower rate than that seen with nontreponemal tests. In these instances, techniques are available to help resolve the treponemal test status, involving processing of patient serum and/or use of an investigational Western blot assay specific for TP antibodies. (8) Rarely, false-positive treponemal tests may be due to infection with other nonvenereal treponemal infections like yaws, bejel, or pinta, particularly in persons from endemic areas.

Laboratory diagnosis of neurosyphilis. Laboratory diagnosis of neurosyphilis is based primarily on a reactive VDRL-CSF. When the VDRL is negative, the diagnosis is suggested by elevated white blood cells (WBC), with or without elevated protein concentration, in the absence of other known causes of these abnormalities. Use of secondary criteria is problematic, since CSF WBCs and/or protein may be elevated in the natural history of HIV infection and other diseases.

The FTA-Abs CSF test is also available for testing CSF specimens, though it lacks the specificity of the VDRL-CSF test. A nonreactive result, however, carries a high negative predictive value and is recommended by some experts to exclude neurosyphilis in VDRL-CSF-negative cases in which minimal abnormalities in WBCs and/or protein raise suspicion for active neurosyphilis.

Improved methods for diagnosing neurosyphilis are needed. Use of PCR for identification of TP in CSF has been disappointing, due to inadequate sensitivity and the inability to distinguish between pathogenic and nonviable treponemes.

New rapid tests for syphilis. Given multiple incentives to accurately diagnose syphilis at the point of care, including the need to identify those infected and initiate treatment of the index case and partners early, numerous rapid treponemal tests have been developed for field-based use. None of these is yet cleared for use in the United States. A recent review of six such tests by the World Health Organization demonstrated a range of sensitivities from 84.5% to 97.7% and specificities from 92.8% to 98.0%. (15) A recent evaluation of three rapid tests by the San Francisco Department of Public Health showed that the Abbott Determine Syphilis TP test (Abbott Laboratories, South Pasadena, CA) had the highest sensitivity, 88% (95% CI 0.81 to 0.96), using whole-blood venipuncture samples, with both 100% sensitivity and specificity on 99 whole-blood fingerstick specimens. The test typically takes 15 minutes to perform, does not require sophisticated laboratory equipment, and costs approximately $2 per test.

Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) is a Gram-negative diplococcus that commonly infects the mucosa of the urethra, cervix, rectum, and throat. It frequently presents as an uncomplicated, symptomatic infection at one or more of these sites. In women, untreated lower genital tract infection, which more often may be asymptomatic, may progress to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Repeated cases of PID increase the risk for chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility.


The mainstays of NG detection have been direct visualization by Gram-stain using light microscopy, as well as bacterial culture. In recent years, testing for NG has been reshaped by the emergence of widely available nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), often supplanting the need for invasive and uncomfortable collection of genital specimens. Nucleic acid probe hybridization assays remain available. Serologic tests for NG are not available, and although enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests are available, their test performance is inferior to standard methods. A 20-minute rapid assay, based on an optical immunoassay (OIA) technology (Thermo Electron Corp., Waltham, MA), was recently cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for testing of endocervical and male urine specimens in symptomatic persons. Its role in clinical care remains to be determined.

Gram stain and culture for NG. Gram staining of clinical specimens allows direct visualization of Gram-negative diplococci within polymorphonuclear leukocytes, supporting the diagnosis of gonorrhea. In symptomatic male urethritis, the sensitivity and specificity of Gram stain approximate that of culture; the utility of Gram stain in asymptomatic urethritis is not as well validated. Gram staining of endocervical smears should not be undertaken unless a skilled microscopist is available. Since saprophytic nonpathogenic Neisseria species colonize the pharynx and rectum, Gram staining of such specimens may lead to false-positive results and should not be done routinely. (16)

Bacterial culture is the gold standard for diagnosis of gonorrhea. Growth of NG is selected using Thayer-Martin medium and 5% C[O.sub.2] incubation at 35[degrees]C to 36.5[degrees]C. Plates are examined at 24-hour intervals through 72 hours' incubation. A candle-extinction jar may be used at field sites where C[O.sub.2] incubation is unavailable. Self-contained transport systems, such as the GasPak C[O.sub.2] iPouch (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ), are available to substitute for incubation. Presumptive diagnosis of culture isolates requires a Gram stain and oxidase test. Carbohydrate-degradation tests are used to differentiate nonNG species and related organisms. NG-specific tests, such as the nucleic acid probe test may be used to confirm isolates. In general, the sensitivity of culture is affected by a host of factors including specimen-collection technique, condition of medium prior to use, and handling issues (e.g., timing of plate inoculation, transit time, and storage of plates). (16)

Nucleic acid amplification testing for NG. Available nucleic acid tests are based on probe hybridization technology, as well as amplification methods. Two such hybridization assays are FDA cleared, including the PACE 2 (Gen-Probe) and Hybrid Capture II (Digene Corp., Gaithersburg, MD) tests, both of which detect NG and C. trachomatis in the same specimen. A version of these two tests identifies the presence of either bacterium and, when positive, must be followed up by the more specific test. A particular advantage of these tests is the ability to store and transport specimens for one week. Sensitivity of these tests is somewhat lower than that of NAATs.

Diagnosis of gonorrhea has undergone dramatic change with the advent and widespread use of NG-specific NAATs for urine, urethral, and endocervical specimens, first available in 1993. While different amplification techniques and nucleic acid targets underlie the variety of available NAATs, from a practical clinical perspective, the noninvasiveness and portability of test collection has increased the potential for more widespread screening. Furthermore, features translating into enhanced clinical practice and public health efforts include: comparable sensitivity to reference-standard tests, such as culture; noninvasiveness of specimen collection; ease of transport; the accurate performance of these tests with a variety of specimen sources; and the ability to detect nonviable organism. (17)

Use of nucleic acid amplification technology for testing of specimens from the oropharynx, rectum, and vagina is subject to limited FDA clearance. In January 2004, the FDA cleared the Gen-Probe APTIMA COMBO 2 for testing self-collected vaginal swabs. While research studies have validated the use of NAATs in certain anatomic sites (18-20), compliance with the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988 requires clinical laboratories to conduct internal evaluations prior to testing specimens using collection methods not cleared by the FDA. Also, the assays are subject to factors that inhibit enzymatic amplification, which may be associated with false-negative results, although internal control procedures instituted by manufacturers have minimized this problem. Finally, a predictable rate of false-positive results using NAATs, as has been observed, may appreciably lower the positive predictive value of these tests when employed in populations with a low-prevalence of NG. (21)

The availability of such technology also allows testing of pooled patient specimens. Pooling permits substantial cost savings of reagents and technicians' time, especially when testing in low-prevalence populations. Numerous published studies have demonstrated pooling does not significantly compromise sensitivity or specificity. (21-23) Pooled testing, however, is not cleared by the FDA. Local laboratories must perform validation studies to comply with regulations under CLIA. Turnaround time is increased if positive specimens are not retested the same day, and care in specimen processing is required to avoid laboratory error. Laboratories planning to implement pooling protocols should review CDC recommendations. (16)

Available NAATs include: the PCR-based Roche AMPLICOR; the BDProbeTec ET, using strand displacement amplification; and the Gen-Probe APTIMA and APTIMA COMBO 2, using transcription-mediated amplification of ribosomal RNA targets. Institutional and laboratory selection among candidate assays requires a review of clinical service goals, population characteristics, and laboratory issues--such as physical space constraints, including segregation of sample processing and amplification areas, technician resources, and other economic and logistical factors.

Despite the advantages of NAATs for NG, a significant benefit of culture is the capacity to determine antibiotic susceptibility of derived isolates. Such monitoring has become increasingly important given the recent emergence of drug-resistant gonococcal species, such as fluoroquinolone-resistant NG. (25)

Chlamydia trachomatis

Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most commonly reported STD in the United States. It is an obligate intracellular bacterium with a complex life cycle that infects mucosa of the lower genital tract, rectum, and throat. It is also the cause of trachoma and lymphogranuloma venereum, rarely seen in this country. Most infection with CT is asymptomatic, more so in women, in whom untreated infection can lead to PID, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility.


Testing for CT has undergone dramatic change with the widespread use of NAATs. Compared to NG testing, alternatives to nucleic acid tests for CT diagnosis are more numerous and include cell culture, EIA- and DFA-based tests, and rapid tests. Serologic testing for acute CT is neither sensitive nor specific and should not be used. Despite a broad array of test alternatives, as well as statistical challenges in comparing accuracy of competing modalities, growing evidence supports use of NAATs for routine CT diagnosis, utilizing a variety of specimen types.

Cell/tissue culture for CT. A variety of methods is available to culture CT directly. Usually, a susceptible cell line is inoculated by a patient specimen, and within 72 hours of incubation, characteristic inclusions of CT elementary and reticulate bodies can be visualized using a CT-specific fluorescein-conjugated antibody. The process is labor intensive, costly, and subject to diminished sensitivity if specimens are handled improperly. Given interlaboratory variation in culture routines, performance of this method is variable. Since the advent of noninvasive nucleic acid tests, the role of CT culture has diminished. Yet given its absolute specificity, in most situations, culture remains the test of choice for legal purposes in sexual abuse cases.

Nucleic acid amplification testing for CT. NAATs available for CT screening include the Roche AMPLICOR, BDProbeTec ET, and Gen-Probe APTIMA assays. A particular advantage of these tests is the ability to test urine samples, in addition to swabs of the endocervix and urethra. Since the sensitivity of these tests exceeds culture, the precise estimation of sensitivity and specificity is difficult and depends on the test used and the specimen tested, though most experts agree that sensitivity of NAATs exceeds that of other tests, especially rapid tests. (16) Use of NAATs identify up to 30% of CT infections that would be missed by other methods. (25) As mentioned previously, in January 2004, the FDA cleared the Gen-Probe APTIMA COMBO 2 for testing self-collected vaginal swab for CT.

Other testing methods. Nucleic acid tests utilizing probe hybridization technology also are available. As discussed earlier, these tests facilitate testing for both CT and GC, simultaneously, are automated and cheap, and do not require refrigeration of transported specimen containers. They cannot be used, however, to test urine and are not as sensitive as NAATs. EIA- and DFA-based tests for CT antigen detection have similar disadvantages and are more technically difficult to perform. (27)

Rapid point-of-care tests for CT. Rapid point-of-care tests for CT include QuickVue Chlamydia (Quidel Corp., San Diego, CA), Clearview Chlamydia (Unipath Limited, Bedford, U.K.), Biostar Chlamydia OIA (Thermo Electron Corp.), and Abbott Testpack (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). These tests offer rapid results, but entail higher cost and decreased sensitivity compared to other testing modalities, such as NAATs. Reliance on these rapid tests may slow adoption of NAATs, especially given logistical and practical considerations in some laboratories, such as lack of staff and loss of revenue from samples redirected to larger labs. In Seattle, for instance, a survey of laboratory directors revealed continued reliance on lower-sensitivity tests for CT six years after the advent of NAATs. (28) While use of rapid tests for CT may be justified in settings where follow-up is extremely unlikely, their utility must be weighed against the benefit of more accurate, less costly, laboratory-based NAATs now in wide use.

Trichomonas vaginalis

The most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection worldwide, trichomoniasis is caused by the protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). Infection is often asymptomatic, especially in men. In women, trichomoniasis may cause a malodorous yellow-green discharge, along with vulvo-vaginal irritation. Since infection is often asymptomatic or mild in men, affected women are often re-exposed to TV from untreated male partners. Trichomoniasis is a risk marker for other STDs, inflammation from the infection may potentiate HIV transmission, and infection during pregnancy may contribute to poor birth outcomes. (3,4)


Wet mount and culture for TV. Using light microscopy, examination of saline wet-mount specimens obtained from pelvic examinations allows direct visualization of motile trichomonads, though sensitivity is operator-dependent and rarely exceeds 70%. (6) Sensitivity of TV detection is increased by culture under microaerophilic conditions. A variety of culture media is commercially available for diagnosis of TV. Also available is the InPouch TV Culture System (Biomed Inc., San Jose, CA). The test involves simultaneous performance of wet mount and can detect presence of a single organism. Viable organisms are required, and inoculated pouches must be transported to the lab within 48 hours, incubated at 37[degrees]C, and read over five to seven days.

Additional tests for TV. A variety of immunoassays, latex agglutination assays, and nucleic acid-based tests have been developed for use on serum and genital samples. Recently, the Xenostrip TV Trichomonas Test (Xenotope Diagnostics Inc., San Antonio, TX), a qualitative immunochromatographic assay, was FDA cleared for use on clinician-collected vaginal swab specimens. (29) The test provides results within 10 minutes and has a relative sensitivity compared to culture of 99% to 100% and specificity of > 98%. A PCR-based test has not been cleared for use in the United States, though local laboratories may develop and evaluate such assays. A recent evaluation of five PCR primers using self-collected vaginal swabs, with comparison to culture and/or EIA, demonstrated only 60% to 90% sensitivity of PCR. (30) Prior investigators reported sensitivity and specificity of TV PCR using vaginal swabs of 97 and 98%, respectively, compared to sensitivity of culture and wet prep of 70 and 36%. (31)

Herpes simplex virus

Infection with herpes simplex virus is among the most common STDs in the world, affecting more than one in five adults in the United States alone. (32) Most genital herpes is caused by HSV type 2. Initial, or primary, episodes may cause severely painful vesicles and ulcers, with or without lymph-node tenderness and enlargement. Less often, primary herpes involves systemic symptoms and causes "aseptic" meningitis. A chronic state of infection then ensues, in which recurrent symptoms vary in tempo and severity. Irrespective of symptoms, intermittent shedding of virus is ongoing, as is the risk of transmitting the virus to sex partners. (33) The infection cannot be cured.


The role of type-specific serologic testing for HSV. Clinical diagnosis of genital HSV is insensitive and nonspecific. (34) The diagnosis of HSV-2 infection has been aided by the availability of serologic tests for type-specific antibody to the virus, supplanting crude antigen testing. Use of these tests necessitates appropriate patient-centered counseling about transmission risk, prevention steps, and treatment, especially since herpes infection continues to carry significant stigma in the general population. The tests cannot differentiate recent infection from that acquired remotely. In many instances, patients diagnosed with HSV-2 can recall symptoms consistent with the infection. Diagnosis of HSV infection may facilitate interventions aimed at minimizing secondary transmission. For instance, a recent clinical trial showed daily antiviral therapy reduced the risk of HSV-2 transmission to uninfected partners. (35)

In general, serologic tests for HSV-2 should be available to those who request them, especially those who are partners to HSV-2-infected persons. Most authorities, however, recommend use of such tests for screening only in high-risk populations, such as persons with other STDs and those with or at risk for HIV infection. Screening the general population, including pregnant women, is not recommended. (33) In particular, serologic tests may be most useful for diagnosing genital herpes on the first presentation of genital symptoms when culture and antigen detection tests are not available, when a recurrent lesion is repeatedly culture-negative, or when a patient's history of symptoms is consistent with genital herpes. A "window period" of six to 12 weeks, during which time antibodies have yet to form after primary infection, however, complicates the use of HSV serology in these instances. (32)

Type-specific antibody tests. The Western blot assay is the gold standard technique for HSV antibody detection and can differentiate between type 1 and 2 antibodies. Limitations include high cost and labor intensity, such that tests have not been developed commercially. (36) Type-specific protein glycoprotein G2 antibody tests for HSV-2 include the HerpeSelect-2 ELISA IgG and HerpeSelect 2 Immunoblot IgG tests (Focus Technologies Inc., Herndon, VA). Sensitivities of these tests vary from 80% to 98%, with specificities [greater than or equal to]96%. (6,35) Since this is a serologic assay measuring IgG, the sensitivity relies on the time since infection, with median positivity occurring within two weeks. Rarely, HSV-2 can be gG2 deficient, resulting in a false-negative result.

Detection of HSV in genital ulcer material. In addition to serologic testing, direct laboratory evaluation of suspicious genital lesions remains important to clinical management of genital ulcer disease. In the United States, HSV and TP cause most such ulcers. While direct laboratory evaluation of genital lesions to rule in syphilis is often most pressing, depending on clinical circumstances lesions suspicious for HSV should be evaluated by collecting a specimen for culture or DFA. Cell culture is the preferred test for laboratory evaluation of suspicious mucocutaneous lesions. The sensitivity of culture is higher for primary vs. recurrent lesions and declines as lesions heal, often several days after onset. HSV culture requires live virus, infected cells, special care in sampling and transport to a virology laboratory; it is time-consuming and expensive. Of note, the enzyme-linked virus-inducible ELVIS HSV system is a 24-hour culture system (Diagnostic Hybrids Inc., Athens, OH) that is commonly used but less sensitive than traditional culture.

Other techniques for direct examination are available. DFA tests, such as the Light Diagnostics HSV 1/2 Typing DFA Kit (Chemicon International Inc., Temecula, CA) and MicroTrak DFA test (Wampole Laboratories, Princeton, NJ), approximate the sensitivity of culture and can distinguish HSV-2 from HSV-1. Compared to other available techniques, cytologic detection of HSV infection, such as by Tzanck prep, is insensitive and nonspecific and thus not recommended. PCR assays for HSV, including multiplex assays, are highly sensitive but are not FDA cleared and thus not readily available. If culture and antigen detection tests are not available or if a recurrent lesion is repeatedly culture-negative, a serologic test for HSV-2 should be considered.


The laboratory plays a crucial role in providing the tools necessary to effectively diagnose and control the spread of sexually transmitted infections. Numerous well-established assays continue to be used in the diagnosis of some STDs. Newer tests, however--some based on advances in molecular diagnostics--have radically improved the efficiency and accuracy of STD diagnosis. Rapid tests, point-of-care testing, and nucleic acid amplification technology represent advances addressing long-standing barriers in STD diagnosis, while meeting with patient acceptance given noninvasiveness, ease of collection, and quick turnaround of many such tests. By working closely with laboratorians, clinicians and public health officials are realizing new opportunities for the early recognition, treatment, and control of STDs.


MLO and Northern Illinois University (NIU), DeKalb, IL, are co-sponsors in offering continuing education units (CEUs) for this issue's article on DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR COMMON STDs and HSV-2. CEUs or contact hours are granted by the College of Health and Human Sciences at NIU, which has been approved as a provider of continuing education programs in the clinical laboratory sciences by the ASCLS P.A.C.E.[R] program (Provider No. 0001) and by the American Medical Technologists Institute for Education (Provider No. 121019; Registry No. 0061). Approval as a provider of continuing education programs has been granted by the state of Florida (Provider No. JP0000496), and for licensed clinical laboratory scientists and personnel in the state of California (Provider No. 351). Continuing education credits awarded for successful completion of this test are acceptable for the ASCP Board of Registry Continuing Competence Recognition Program. After reading the article on page 10, answer the following test questions and send your completed test form to NIU along with the nominal fee of $20. Readers who pass the test successfully (scoring 70 percent or higher) will receive a certificate for 1 contact hour of P.A.C.E.[R] credit. Participants should allow four to six weeks for receipt of certificates.

The fee for each continuing education test will be $20.

All feature articles published in MLO are peer-reviewed.

This test was prepared by Shirley A. Richmond, PhD, Dean, College of Health and Human Sciences, MT, ASCP, CLS, NCA, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.

1. Infection caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum is diagnosed by

a. direct examination of suspicious lesion material only

b. conventional serologic

c. both a and b

d. by routine culture

2. Primary stage of infection with syphilis is

a. mucosal lesions

b. rashes on palms and soles

c. painless ulcers (chancre)

d. temperature

3. CDC defines early latent syphilis as infection in less than ______ months' duration.

a. 24

b. 18

c. 12

d. 6

4. Disease presenting with late manifestations, encompassing cardiovascular features and formation of gummas is defined as

a. early latent syphilis

b. primary syphilis

c. tertiary syphilis

d. neurological syphilis

5. TP-specific staining of histologic specimens is

a. a highly sensitive test

b. dependent upon concentration of treponema for accuracy results

c. an obsolete test

d. highly recommended

6. The DFA-TP

a. uses a fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled globulin

b. detects TP antigen

c. can be used to test oral lesions

d. all of the above

7. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction test detects

a. TP only

b. Haemophilus ducreyi only

c. Herpes simplex virus only

d. None of the above

8. Nontreponemal assays use

a. cardiolipin

b. lecithin

c. IgM antigen

d. A and b

9. The FTA-Abs requires a fluorescent microscope to detect adherence of the patient's serum antibody to TP antigen fixed to a slide.

a. True

b. False

10. NG can be detected by:

a. Gram stain

b. bacterial culture

c. serology test

d. a and b

11. Carbohydrate-degradation tests are used to differentiate nonNG species and related organisms.

a. True

b. False

12. Nucleic acid test are based on:

a. serology techniques

b. hybridization technology

c. amplification methods

d. b and c

13. NG-specific NAAT test can be used for:

a. urine

b. urethral specimens

c. endocervical specimens

d. all of the above

14. Chlamydia trachomatis is

a. most commonly reported STD

b. an obligate intracellular bacterium

c. the cause of trachoma

d. all of the above

15. In sexual abuse cases, the preferred test for CT is


b. EIA

c. culture

d. DFA

16. Trichomoniasis is

a. caused by a protozoan

b. always symptomatic

c. more severe in men than women

d. not a risk marker for other STDs

17. The InPouch TV culture system

a. requires viable organisms

b. must be transported to the lab within 48 hours

c. is incubated at 37[degrees]C

d. all of the above

18. HSV is

a. a rare STD

b. asymptomic

c. an STD that can be cured

d. none of the above

19. Western blot assay is

a. the gold-standard technique for HSV

b. can differentiate between type 1 or 2 antibodies

c. labor intensive

d. all of the above

20. Cell culture is the preferred test for laboratory evaluation of suspicious mucocutaneous lesions caused by HSV.

a. True

b. False

Table 1: Performance of standard serologic tests for syphilis*

 Stage of untreated syphilis Specificity
 % sensitivity (range) % (range)
Nontreponemal test Primary Secondary Latent Nonsyphilis

RPR card 86 (77-99) 100 98 (95-100) 98 (93-99)
VDRL slide 78 (74-87) 100 96 (88-100) 98 (96-99)
Nontreponemal test
FTA-Abs 84 (70-100) 100 100 87 (84-100)
TPPA ** 90-100 50-100

* Modified from Larsen. S.A., V. Pope, R.E. Johnson, et al., A Manual of
tests for syphilis. 9th ed. 1999. Washington, DC: American Public Health
Association, except as indicated. Indicated percentage ranges based on
CDC studies. (Citation 8 in references.)
** Fujirebio Diagnostics Inc., Serodia--TP-PA [package insert, p.4].
Malvern, PA, 2002, comparing TPPA with MHA-TP in population of patients
suspected of syphilis by symptoms and history, as well as population of
normal controls. (Not cited in references.)

Table 2: Performance of selected tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae*

 Sensitivity Specificity
 (%; range) (%; range)

Culture 85-95 100
Nucleic acid amplification
 test ([double dagger])
 Urine specimens, LCR 94.3-100 98.2-100
Nucleic acid hybridization (nonamplified)
 test ([dagger])
 Endocervical swab specimens 85.4-100 93.5-99.6
 Male urethral swab specimens 91.5-100 82.2-98.9

Performance of selected tests for Chlamydia trachomatis**

Cell culture (male and female) 30-86 100
Nucleic acid amplification
 test ([double dagger])
 Endocervical specimens
 PCR 85.0-100 99.0-100
 SDA 92.8-100 98.2-99.3
 TMA 82.5-100 99.4-100
Urine specimens
 PCR 86.7-100 97.0-100
 SDA 92.8-100 93.8-99.3
 TMA 82.5-100 98.7-100
Nucleic acid hybridization (nonamplified)
 test ([dagger])
 Male and female swab specimens 75.3-91.7 99.0-100

* Koumans EH, Johnson RE, Knapp JS, St Louis ME. Laboratory testing for
Neisseria gonorrhoeae by recently introduced nonculture tests: a
performance review with clinical and public health considerations. Clin
Infect Dis. 1998 Nov; 27(5): 1171-1180. (Not cited in references.)
** Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Detection of Genitourinary
Chlamydia Infections, 2001 California Department of Health Services STD
Control Branch and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics:
Berkeley, CA. (
([dagger]) Gen-Probe PACE 2, compared to culture as reference standard
([double dagger]) NAATs include polymerase chain reaction (PCR, e.g.,
Roche AMPLICOR), strand displacement amplification (SDA, e.g.,
BDProbeTec), and transcription-mediated amplification (TMA, e.g.
Gen-Probe APTIMA) tests; ligase chain reaction (LCR, e.g., Abbott LCx NG
Assay) no longer commercially available in the U.S.

Acknowledgement: The authors wish to thank Gail Bolan for her contributions in the preparation of this manuscript.


1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance:2002. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.

2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Primary and Secondary Syphilis--United States:2002. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003. MMWR 2003;52:1117-1120.

3. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect. 1999;75(1):3-17.

4. Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh P, et al. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 3rd ed. 1999:1454. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

5. Golden MR, Marra CM, Holmes KK. Update on syphilis: resurgence of an old problem. JAMA. 2003;290(11):1510-1514.

6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines:2002. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002. MMWR 2002;51(No. RR-6):1-82.

7. Romanowski B, Forsey E, Prasad E, et al. Detection of Treponema pallidum by a fluorescent monoclonal antibody test. Sex Transm Dis. 1987;14(3):156-159.

8. Larsen SA, Pope V, Johnson RE, et al. A manual of tests for syphilis. 9th ed. Washington, DC. American Public Health Association. 1999.

9. Liu H, Rodes B, Chen CY, et al. New tests for syphilis: rational design of a PCR method for detection of Treponema pallidum in clinical specimens using unique regions of the DNA polymerase I gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(5):1941-1946.

10. Larsen SA, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8(1):1-21.

11. Creegan L, Bauer HM, Klausner JD, et al. An evaluation of the relative sensitivities of VDRL and TP-PA among patients with darkfield-confirmed primary syphilis [Abstract 0641]. In: 15th Biennial Congress of the International Society for Sexually Transmitted Diseases Research. 2003. Ottawa, Canada.

12. El-Zaatari MM, Martens MG. False-negative syphilis screening due to change in temperature. Sex Transm Dis. 1994;21(5):243-246.

13. Joyanes P, Borobio MV, Arquez JM, et al. The association of false-positive rapid plasma reagin results and HIV infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25(10):569-571.

14. Rompalo AM, Cannon RO, Quinn TC, et al. Association of biologic false-positive reactions for syphilis with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 1992;165(6):1124-1126.

15. World Health Organization. Laboratory-based evaluation of rapid syphilis diagnostics. The Sexually Transmitted Diseases Diagnostics Initiative (SDI). Geneva, Switzerland. World Health Organization Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. 2003.

16. Johnson RE, Newhall WJ, Papp JR, et al. Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections:2002. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(RR-15):1-38; quiz CE1-4.

17. Marrazzo JM. Impact of New Sexually Transmitted Disease Diagnostics on Clinical Practice and Public Health Policy. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2001;3(2):147-151.

18. Shafer MA, Moncada J, Boyer CB, et al. Comparing first-void urine specimens, self-collected vaginal swabs, and endocervical specimens to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by a nucleic acid amplification test. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(9):4395-4399.

19. Schachter J, McCormack WM, Chernesky MA, et al. Vaginal swabs are appropriate specimens for diagnosis of genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(8):3784-3789.

20. Richardson E, Sellors JW, Mackinnon S, et al. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections and specimen collection preference among women, using self-collected vaginal swabs in community settings. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30(12):880-885.

21. Katz, AR, Effler, PV, Ohye, RG, et al., False-positive gonorrhea test results with a nucleic acid amplification test: the impact of low prevalence on positive predictive value. Clin Infect Dis. In press.

22. Clark AM, Steece R, Crouse K, et al. Multisite pooling study using ligase chain reaction in screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28(10):565-568.

23. Morre, SA, Meijer CJ, Munk C, et al. Pooling of urine specimens for detection of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections by PCR in a low-prevalence population: cost-saving strategy for epidemiological studies and screening programs. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(4):1679-1680.

24. Morre SA, Van Dijk R, Meijer CJ, et al. Pooling cervical swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR: sensitivity, dilution, inhibition, and cost-saving aspects. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(6):2375-2376.

25. Fluoroquinolone-resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Hawaii, 1999, and decreased susceptibility to azithromycin in N. gonorrhoeae, Missouri: 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000;49(37):833-837.

26. Schachter J. DFA, EIA, PCR, LCR and other technologies: what tests should be used for diagnosis of chlamydia infections? Immunol Invest. 1997;26(1-2):157-161.

27. California STD/HIV Prevention Training Center and the California Chlamydia Action Coalition. Sexually Transmitted Chlamydial Infections: Continuing Education for Primary Care Clinicians. Berkeley, CA. 2002.

28. Battle TJ, Golden MR, Suchland KL, et al. Evaluation of laboratory testing methods for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the era of nucleic acid amplification. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(8):2924-2927.

29. Miller GA, Klausner JD, Coates TJ, et al. Assessment of a rapid antigen detection system for Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10(6):1157-1158.

30. Crucitti T, Van Dyck E, Tehe A, et al. Comparison of culture and different PCR assays for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in self collected vaginal swab specimens. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79(5):393-398.

31. Madico G, Quinn TC, Rompalo A, et al. Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection by PCR using vaginal swab samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(11):3205-3210.

32. Fleming DT, McQuillan GM, Johnson RE, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(16):1105-1111.

33. Guerry S, Allen B, Branagan B, et al. Guidelines for the Use of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Serologies: Recommendations from the California Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Controllers Association and the California Department of Health Services (CA DHS). Sacramento, CA. California Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Controllers Association and the California Department of Health Services (CA DHS). 2003.

34. Langenberg AG, Corey L, Ashley RL, et al. A prospective study of new infections with herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2. Chiron HSV Vaccine Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(19):1432-1438.

35. Corey L, Wald A, Patel R, et al. Once-daily valacyclovir to reduce the risk of transmission of genital herpes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(1):11-20.

36. Ashley RL, Wald A. Genital herpes: review of the epidemic and potential use of type-specific serology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999; 12(1):1-8.

37. Turner KR, Wong EH, Kent CK, et al. Serologic herpes testing in the real world: validation of new type-specific serologic herpes simplex virus tests in a public health laboratory. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(7):422-425.

Christopher S. Hall, MD, MS, and is Fellow at California STD/HIV Prevention Training Center, and the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. Jeffrey D. Klausner, MD, MPH, is director, STD Services, San Francisco Department of Public Health, and assistant professor of Medicine, Divisions of Infectious Diseases and AIDS & Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

By Christopher S. Hall, MD, MS, and Jeffrey D. Klausner, MD, MPH
COPYRIGHT 2004 Nelson Publishing
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Author:Hall, Christopher S.; Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Publication:Medical Laboratory Observer
Article Type:Cover Story
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2004
Previous Article:Unique laboratorians.
Next Article:Real-time STD reporting is just around the corner!

Related Articles
Disease watch.
Answering your questions on cost-effectiveness of nucleic acid amplification, formalin fixation for IHC, and glucose critical values.
An Introduction to Sexually Transmitted Diseases.
What do you know about STDS? (Teen health issue: infectious diseases * microbes).
Georgia prenatal care providers' perceptions of barriers to sexually transmitted disease screening.
Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000.
The estimated direct medical cost of sexually transmitted diseases among American youth, 2000.
A report card for screening for sexually transmitted diseases: bis dat qui cito dat.
Hospital-based clinic visits by women seldom include routine screening for STDs.
Teenagers, dating violence and disease.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters