Determining some physical parameters of soccer and in door soccer players.
One of the most important aim of sport studies originates from wishes about reaching aimed succes during competition
Sport's being reached to big communities, makes it a fact which take it only being a activity out, obtains material and spiritual success at the same time.
Anxieties and questions about how to be successful at sport, how to reach to peak and how to stay at the peak make scientists interest for choosing players according to branch, determaning suitable trainig methods, presenting scientific data about performance and physical fitness according to aims (M. Duyul, 2005).
Even if there are so many documents about how soccer have appeared in world literature, it was started in England at the modern sense. (G. Carnibella el al., 1996)
Strenght, flexibility, anaerobic- aerobic power and speed have a very big importance at performing a movement in soccer
In soccer, essipecially performance and strenght are closely related with lenght, body weight, flexibility levels. At this game, to be enduranced is important as much as being speed because, soccer game is being played with high tempo in long term. For players adapting this situation, they should improve their strenght, endurance, speed, condition and flexibility properties with trainings which are based on scientific basics. (M. Duyul, 2005, H. Taskin, 2006).
Futsal is an intermittent sport that makes high physical, technical, and tactical demands on players. It is played on a court of 40620 m with goals of 362 m (the same as in handball). As in basketball, two 20-min periods are scheduled, and here there is an important distinction from football, in that like basketball, the clock is stopped for some events, which usually means that the game lasts 75-85% longer than the scheduled 40 min. This varies according to the possibilities given by the rules: time-outs, double penalties, court cleaning, stoppages for injuries, medical attention, and so on. Teams can request a time-out (1 min) in each half and there is a break of 10 min between halves.
At literature, only a few studies have analyzed some antropometric and aerobic characteristic of soccer and indoor soccer players (E.M. Gorostiaga et al, 2009).
Even if these branches are basically so similiar, they are different each other according to their rules. So, it is thought that there should be physical differences of these branches' players
The aim of the study was to determine some physical parameters of in door soccer and soccer players.
At this study, elite 32 indoor soccer players and 37 elite football players were joined volunteerly. Volunteers were performed some physical measurements
Age, body weight, body lenght, Body mass index and body fat percentage measurements were done Physology Laboratory of Physical Education and Sport Collegue of Erciyes University.
The age of each volunteer was recorded and calculated from the date of birth which was written in their ID card. Body Height was measured to the nearest 0.1cm using scala
Body Weight was measured by using Bio Impedance Analysis (Tanita BC418MA)
Also body mass index was measured by using Body Impedance Analysis (Tanita BC418MA)
Body mass index was calculated as weight (kg) / height [(m).sup.2] according to standards recommended by The World Health Organization (WHO, 1987).
Four sites (Biceps, Triceps, Subscapular and Supraliac) of volunteers were measured by using skinfold callipers and Body Fat Percentage was estimated by Durning and Womersley formula
Durning and Womersley Formula was described in literature as D=1,1631-0,0632X (Biceps + Triceps + Subscapular + Suprailiac) for 20-29 aged man (I. Erdemir, E. Tufekcioglu, 2008, F. Akca, S. Muniroglu, 2006)
30 seconds shuttle, 10 metre sprint, vertical jump and flexibility measurements were done in Suleyman Demirel Sport Saloon of Erciyes University.
The volunteers were performed 20 minutes of individual warm up and then they performed tests.
Vertical jump was performed using a New test vertical jump meter. They performed vertical jump three times and best value was recorded
Volunteers were performed shuttle during 30 seconds and recorded how many shuttle they were performed at the end of 30 seconds
New test was used for measuring volunteers' 10 meter sprint values Volunteers had to choose which foot they had to put on the starting line for the sprint standing position start. They then performed 10 m sprints three times. Best value was recorded
Flexibility measurement was done by sit and reach test (D. Guler, 2009)
Data were recorded on computer by using Package programe which was called SPSS. For statistical analysis between groups, independent t test was performed.
Protocol of the Study
Measurements of volunteers were done at the same time periods and enviromental conditions in Physology Laboratory of Physical Education and Sport Collegue and Suleyman Demirel Sport Saloon of Erciyes University.
As a result of the comparement of some physical parameters of Soccer and Indoor Soccer players according to Table I; it was not found meaningful difference at the lenght, body weight, flexibility and doyy mass index parameters (p>0.05). While meaningful difference was found about body fat percentage parameter at the level of p<0.05, meaningful differences were also found about age, vertical jump, 30 second shuttle and 30 meter sprint parameters at the level of p<0.01.
At this study, which was aimed to compare some physical parameters of Soccer and Indoor soccer players; Meaningful difference was found at the age parameter (p<0.01). In our study we found age avarage of indoor soccer players as 22,53[+ or -]0,98 (year) and soccer players' age avarage as 21,16[+ or -]1,95 (year). While H. Taskin et al (2007) were found footbal players age avarage as 22,53 [+ or -] 2,78 (year), were found indoor soccer players age avarage as 25,6[+ or -]2,5(year). The reason of finding this meaningful difference was thought that players which had more sport age, were prefered Indoor soccer.
Meaningful difference was not found at the lenght parameter (p>0.05) In our study we found lenght avarage of indoor soccer players as 180,16[+ or -]3,17 (cm) and soccer players' lenght avarage as 179,03[+ or -]7,50 (cm). While A. Bandyopadhyay (2007) was found soccer players' lenght avarage as 165,10[+ or -]3,90, Barbero Alvarez et al (2008) were found indoor soccer players lenght avarage as 175[+ or -]6 (cm). The reason of it was thought that most of thet soccer players which participated to study, were playing as mid-fielders and successful indoor soccer players and midfielder soccer players' lenght component of phsyical parameters were close sizes. Meaningful difference was not found at the body weight parameter (p>0.05). I. Guerra et al. (2004) was found body weigt of soccer players as 68,5[+ or -]4,81(kg) were found body weight of indoor soccer players as 73.8[+ or -] 5.7 (kg),
E.M. Gorostiaga et al. (2009) were not also found meaningful difference between Indoor soccer and Soccer players. Their findings were also similiar like our study
Meaningful difference was not found at the BMI parameter (p>0.05). Underlying reason of it was thouth that Both player groups were elite and they were training regularly with high intensive trainings.
Meaningful difference was found at the BFP parameter (p<0.05). It was thought that Mid-fielders are the most distance runners in soccer. So that, their BFP levels were lower than other position players. Indoor soccer players were close to mid-fielders as player profile.
Meaningful difference was not found at the flexibility parameter (p>0.05). In soccer and Indoor soccer, flexibility have important advantages for performing a technical movement or combinated technical movements. Underlying reason of not to finding meaningful difference at this parameter was thought that both of the player groups were technical players and their flexibility levels were so close to each other.
Meaningful difference was found at the vertical jump parameter in favor of soccer players (p<0.01). The vertical jump height itself is a good measure of specific muscular performance (E. Gunay, 2008, S.M. Ostojic, 2000). E.M. Gorostiaga et al. (2009) were found meaningful difference between indoor soccers and soccer players on vertical jump parameter. Their findings were supported our findings
Meaningful difference was found at the 30 second shuttle parameter (p<0.01). Strenght is a basic feature (U. Wisloff et al. 1998) Underlying reason of it was thought that characteristic of Indoor soccer game was being faster than soccer, based on indoor soccer players so that Indoor soccer players' muscular strenght and endurance should be beter than soccer players
Meaningful difference was found at the 10 meter sprint parameter (p<0.01). The reason of it was thought that Indoor soccer was a multiple-sprints sport in which there were more high-intensity phases than in soccer. As a result of the study, Indoor soccer players were more dominant than soccer players about short timed and high intensitive excercises. We thought that this situation could be based on difference of game field sizes.
AKCA, F., MUNIROGLU, S., 2006, The Evaluation Of Somatotype Profile Of Turkish National Male Flatwater Kayak Team Paddlers Spormetre Journal Of Physical Education And Sport Sciences, IV (2) 43-47.
BANDYOPADHYAY, A., 2007, Antropometry And Body Composition In Soccer and Volleyball Players In West Bengal, India, J Physiol Anthropol 26(4):501-505
CARNIBELLA, G., FOX, A., FOX, K., CANN, J.M., MARCH, J., MARCH, P., 1996, Football Violence In Europe, The Social Research Centre, 28 St. Clements.
DUYUL, M., 2005, Comparation Of Effects To Succes Of Motor Values And Antropometric Characteristic Of Handball, Volleyball, Football University Teams. Master Thesis Pp:2 19 Mayis University Samsun.
ERDEMIR, I., TUFEKCIOGLU, E., 2008, The Comparison of Some Physiological and Physical Parameters Affecting Cortisol Circadian Rhythm, Balikesir University, Journal Of Social Sciences Institute, Vol: 20 Pp: 1-10
GOROSTIAGA, E.M.,, LLODIO, I., IBANEZ, J., GRANADOS, C., NAVARRO, I., RUESTA, M., BONNABAU, H., IZQUIERDO, M., 2009, Differences in physical fitness among indoor and outdoor elite male soccer players. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Jul;106(4):483-91
GUERRA, I., CHAVES, R., BARROS, T., TIRAPEGUI, J., 2004, The Influence Of Fluid Ingestion On Performance Of Soccer Players During A Match, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 3, Pp: 198-202
GULER, D., 2009, The Evaluation of Some Physical And Physiological Characteristics of the 10-13 Years-Old Group Boys that Participate In Summer Football Courses, Journal Of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Education Faculty, Year: 9, Vol: 17, Pp: 17-27
GUNAY, E., 2008, The Effect Of Regular Swimming Trainings On All Physical And Physiological Parameters, Unpublished Master Graduation Thesis, Gazi University, Healthy Science Instute, Ankara Pp:110,
OSTOJIC, S.M., 2000, Physical And Physiologic Characteristic Of Elite Serbian Soccer Players Series: Physical Education and Sport Vol. 1, No 7, Pp. 23-29
TASKIN, H., 2006, Investigation Some Physical Parameters And 30 Meter Sprint Capabilities Of Professional Soccer Players' According To Their Playing Positions. Spormetre Physical Education and Sport Science Journal, IV (2) 49-54
TASKIN, H., KAYA, M., ERKMEN, N., 2007. Evaluation And Determination Of Speed-Dribling Skills Of Professional Soccer Players According To Different Leeagues, Spormetre Physical Education and Sport Science Journal, V (1) 17-20
WISLOFF, U., HELGERUD, J., HOFF, J., 1998. Strength And Endurance Of Elite Soccer Players, Med Sci Sports Exerc. Mar; 30 (3), 462-467.
WHO (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION)., 1987, Measuring Obesity Classification And Description Of Antropometric Data Report On WHO Consultation On The Epidomology Of Obesity, Warsaw, Pp:21-23.
Pepe Osman (1), Gunay Erkan (1), Coksevim Bekir (1), Sucan Serdar (1) Polat Metin (1)
(1) Physical Education And Sport College Of Erciyes University, TURKEY
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org / 07.02.2010 / 14.02.2010
Table I: Comparement Of Some Physical Parameters of Soccer and Indoor Soccer Players Parameters Groups n X [+ or -] SD Age (year) Indoor Soccer 32 22,53 [+ or -] 0,98 Soccer 37 21,16 [+ or -] 1,95 Lenght (cm) Indoor Soccer 32 180,16 [+ or -] 3,17 Soccer 37 179,03 [+ or -] 7,50 Body Weight (kg) Indoor Soccer 32 73,47 [+ or -] 3,52 Soccer 37 73,24 [+ or -] 3,04 Body Mass Index Indoor Soccer 32 22,64 [+ or -] 1,03 Soccer 37 22,92 [+ or -] 1,61 Body Fat Percentage Indoor Soccer 32 9,68 [+ or -] 2,38 Soccer 37 11,18 [+ or -] 2,72 30 Seconds Shuttle Indoor Soccer 32 16,38 [+ or -] 2,93 Soccer 37 17,41 [+ or -] 3,35 10 metre sprint Indoor Soccer 32 61,56 [+ or -] 3,72 Soccer 37 52,54 [+ or -] 8,57 Flexibility (cm) Indoor Soccer 32 54,28 [+ or -] 1,42 Soccer 37 46,11 [+ or -] 4,65 Vertical Jump (cm) Indoor Soccer 32 3,73 [+ or -] 0,17 Soccer 37 4,12 [+ or -] 0,18 Parameters Groups t p Age (year) Indoor Soccer 3,753 ,000 ** Soccer Lenght (cm) Indoor Soccer ,833 ,409 ns Soccer Body Weight (kg) Indoor Soccer ,283 ,778 ns Soccer Body Mass Index Indoor Soccer -,876 ,384 ns Soccer Body Fat Percentage Indoor Soccer -2,440 ,017 * Soccer 30 Seconds Shuttle Indoor Soccer 10,151 ,000 ** Soccer 10 metre sprint Indoor Soccer -9,398 ,000 ** Soccer Flexibility (cm) Indoor Soccer -1,349 ,182 ns Soccer Vertical Jump (cm) Indoor Soccer 5,803 ,000 ** Soccer * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, ns: not significant, X [+ or -] SD: mean [+ or -] standart deviation
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||SPORT AND PERFORMANCE|
|Author:||Osman, Pepe; Erkan, Gunay; Bekir, Coksevim; Serdar, Sucan; Metin, Polat|
|Publication:||Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education and Sport/Science, Movement and Health|
|Date:||Jun 1, 2010|
|Previous Article:||The effect of combined training on some conditional parameters of basketball players aged 12-14.|
|Next Article:||Effect of boxes of different heights developments explosive ability of leags and level of long jump.|