Detection of a chemical marker from ovipositing females in Rhynchophorus Ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculiondae).
The red palm weevil (RPW), Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier), is an economically important tissue-boring pest of date palm in many parts of the world . In the mid-1980s, the RPW was discovered attacking palms in the Arabian Peninsula [9,3]. and is now causing severe damage to date palms in plantations all over Egypt.
The concealed feeding behavior of the RPW makes it very difficult to detect infestation at early stages. Often rotting of the internal tissue leads to the death of the date palm tree . Current tactics to manage the weevil are largely based on insecticide application, although deepening concerns about environmental pollution have lead to a strong emphasis on the development of integrated pest management (IPM) based on pheromone traps and biological control rather than insecticides. Besides synthetic insecticides [15,1,6,20,4], researchers have investigated the use of plant extracts [18,13], and pheromone trapping of R. ferrugineus and R. palmarum [10,2,11,16].
R. palmarum, as other coleoptera, depends on chemical communication to coordinate its behavioral activities . Many insects, when depositing their eggs, leave behind oviposition markers, which discourage other females of the species from choosing that site for their own eggs. Oviposition markers have been confirmed in the granary weevil (Sitophilus granarius L.)  and Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic), George .
The observation that female RPW tend not to lay their eggs where eggs have already been laid, directed our research to investigate the cause of this behavior. Firstly, the external and internal morphology of the female ovipositor and related sensilla were carefully examined, photographed and described. Secondly, compounds adhering to the egg surface were extracted, their egg-laying deterrence tested and their constituents analyzed.
Materials And Methods
Adult weevils were collected from infested palm trees. The insects were maintained in the laboratory in plastic containers at 23-27[degrees] and 70-90% RH, with a 12h light/dark cycle and were fed twice a week with pieces of sugar cane .
Both male and female reproductive segments were dissected, especially the female ovipositor and male copulatory organs. Samples were closely examined and photos were made with a research light microscope (stereoscope).
Extracts with ethanol, methanol, acetone, hexane and dichloromethane were obtained from eggs laid and from the end parts of 3 female abdomens. Groups of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 eggs were immersed in one of the solvents used for extraction for 24h.
Each extract from female genitalia parts and eggs was tested by spraying on 3 separate small pieces of sugar cane which were then provided as oviposition sites for 24h to egg-laying females. For control, the same procedure was followed using pure solvent. At the end of 24h the sugar cane pieces were carefully cut open and the eggs gently collected with a fine camel's hair brush. The results were tabulated and the means recorded.
More than 100 eggs were collected and extracted with acetone. The extract was injected into a Varian 450 GC/Varian 240 MS, with a capillary column GC:VF-5ms 30 m x 0.25 mm, iDDF = 0.25 [micro]m. Column flow: 1.0 ml/min. Injector: 250[degrees]C. Column oven: 80[degrees]C (2 min.) [right arrow] 290[degrees]C (8[degrees]C/min.) 290 [degrees]C (2 [degrees]C/min.).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The collected data were subjected to normal statistical analysis as set out by . Treatment mean comparisons were made using least significant difference (LSD) at the 5% level of probability.
Results And Discussion
Dissection and careful observation of the hind segments of the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus revealed the presence of two symmetrical glands in the ovipositor of the females, but absent in males. R. ferrugineus, as other coleopteran species, depends on chemical communication to coordinate its behavioral activities. The dissection of both sexes allowed us to determine that at the posterior end of the ovipositor only the females have a symmetrical pair of glands, which lack a reservoir. Multiple hairs in the area spread a secretion on eggs as they are laid. At the bases of the hairs around the glands small granules were found, possibly formed by waxes secreted from the pairs of glands. In the corresponding position in males we observed hairs on two spots.
The morphological examination of the gland suggests that the insect does not possess a reservoir to store the secretion, indicating that this secretion must be synthesized and released in direct response to the stimulus of laying eggs. This gland, due to its location, can be considered as a modified accessory gland which probably releases its secretions onto the eggs as they pass out through the ovipositor. Similar secretion releasing mechanisms could also be expected in insects of the same tribe and even among curculiondae in general.
These two glands were rectangular in shape and could easily be separated in females. On other hand, when observing the posterior end of the copulatory segments or the end of the abdomen in males, the shape of the gland was completely different, like dark spots, which could not be easily separated.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Effect of the egg extract on the number of eggs laid:
The highest numbers of eggs per female were laid where the treatment was weakest, when fewer than 10 eggs had been extracted. Fewer eggs per female were laid where the egg extract was more concentrated (Table 1).
Table 1. The effect of number of eggs extracted by different solvents on the number of eggs laid b females.
Chemical analyses of egg extract:
The GC analysis of an egg extract is presented in Fig. 3. There are a few peaks, but two peaks are the most obvious in this extract. The chemical structure of the curve number one (18.886 min, Scan: 962, 50: 1000, lon: 6248 us, RIC: 183450), shown in the Figs. 4 and 5, may be Z,Z-10,12-Hexadecadienal--[C.sub.16][H.sub.28]O, MW 236 or Oleic Acid--CAS No. 112-80-1, [C.sub.18][H.sub.34][O.sup.2], MW 282.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[1.] Abraham, V.A., 1971. Note on an effective method of preventing entry by red weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus into the stem of coconut palm through cut petioles. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences., 41: 1130-1131.
[2.] Abraham, V.A., 1987. Study of sex pheromone and other attractants for the management of major pests of coconut. Final report of research project. Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasakgod, India, pp: 1-8.
[3.] Abraham, V.A., M.A. Al Shuaibi, J.R. Faleiro, R.A. Abuzuhairah & P.S.P.V. Vidyasagar, 1998. An integrated management approach for red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Oliv., a key pest of date palm in the Middle East. Sultan Qabus University Journal for Scientific Research, Agricultural Sciences, 3: 77-84.
[4.] Ajlan, A.M., M.S. Shawir, M.M. Abo-El-Saad, M.A. Rezk & K.S. Abdulsalam, 2000. Laboratory evaluation of certain insecticides against the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Oliv). Scientific Journal of King Faisal University (Basic and Applied Sciences). 1: 15-26.
[5.] Bernard, D.R. & J.P. Ronald, 1987. Insects that mark host plants. Bio Science, 37: 400-406.
[6.] Butani, K.D., 1975. Insect pests of fruit crops and their control: date palm. Pesticide Research Journal., 9: 40-42.
[7.] George, N.M., 1992. Egg distribution on seeds by Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 28: 301-305.
[8.] Gomez, V.S. & M. Ferry, 1999. Attempts at biological control of data palm pests recently found in Spain. In: Canard M & Beyssatarnaouty V (Eds.) Proceedings of the First Regional Symposium for Applied Biological Control in Mediterranean Countries, Cairo, 25-29 October 1998. Imprimerie Sacco, Toulouse, France, pp: 121-125.
[9.] Gush, H., 1997. Date with disaster. The Gulf Today. September 29. P:16.
[10.] Haglay, E.A.C., 1965. Test of attractants for the palm weevil. Journal of Economic Entomology, 58: 1002-1003.
[11.] Hallet, R.H., G. Gries, J.H. Borden, E. Czyzewska, A.C. Oehlschlager, H.D. Pierce, N.P. Agerilli & A. Rary, 1993. Aggregation pheromones of two Asian palm weevils, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus and R. palmarum. Naturwissenschaften 80: 328-331.
[12.] Kaakeh, W., A. Khamis & M.M. Aboul-Nour, 2001. The Red Palm Weevil: The most dangerous agricultural pest. UAE University Press. pp: 163.
[13.] Nasser, M.M. & M.A. Abdullah, 2001. Evaluation of azadirachtin for control of the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Oliver) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of the Egyptian German Society of Zoology. E, Entomology, 36: 163-173.
[14.] Niewiada, A., J. Nawrot, J. Szafranek, B. Szafranek, E. Synak, H. Jelen & E. Wasowicz, 2005. Some factors affecting egg-laying of the granary weevil (Sitophilus granarius L.). Journal of Stored Products Research, 41(5): 544-555.
[15.] Nirula, K.K., 1956 Investigation on the pests of coconut palm part IV: Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, F. Indian Coconut Journal., 10: 28-44.
[16.] Oehlschager, A.C., C.M. Chinchiles, L.F. Jiron, R. Mexzon & B. Morgan, 1993. Development of a pheromone based trap for the American palm weevil, Rhynchophorus palmarum (L) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 86: 1382-1392.
[17.] Sanchez, P., H. Cerda, A. Cabrera, F.H. Caetano, M. Materan, F. Sanchez & K. Jaffe, 1996. Secretory mechanisms for the male produced aggregation pheromone of the palm weevil Rhynchophorus palmarum L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 42: 1113-1119.
[18.] Shaarawi, F.A., K.E. Kamel & A.M. Al Qahtani, 2000. Toxicity and histopathologic effects of two plant extracts, as compared to an insecticide, on the midgut of the fourth instar larvae of the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Oliver) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of the Union of Arab Biology, 13A: 491-503.
[19.] Snedecor, G.W. & W.C. Cochran, 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
[20.] Vidyasagar, P.S. & S.K. Bhat, 1991. Pest management in coconut gardens. Journal of Plantation Crops., 19: 163-182.
Mohamed S. Salem, Mohamed H. Belal, Mahmoud E. Nour, Emad A. Sayed
Department of Economic Entomology and Pesticides, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Cairo, Giza, Egypt.
Mohamed H. Belal, Department of Economic Entomology and Pesticides, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Cairo, Giza, Egypt.
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Mobile: 00202 012 214 5224; Fax: 00202 3760 5962
Table 1: The effect of number of eggs extracted by different solvents on the number of eggs laid by females. Number of Extractors eggs extracted Ethanol Methanol Acetone Hexane Dichloromethane 0 17.33 14.33 14.67 16 18.67 10 5.33 3.67 4.67 5.67 4.33 20 3.67 3.67 3.00 4.00 3.00 30 2.33 3.00 1.67 2.67 1.67 40 1.33 1.67 0.67 1.67 1.00 50 0.67 0.33 0.00 1.33 0.33 5.11 A 4.44 A 4.11 A 5.22 A 4.83 A Number of Mean eggs extracted 0 16.20 A 10 4.73 B 20 3.47 C 30 2.27 CD 40 1.27 DE 50 0.33 E --Means within column and row followed by the same letter are not significantly different at 5% probability. --Eggs used (A): [L.S.D.sub.0.05] = 1.26, Extractors (B): N.S, A*B: N.S
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||ORIGINAL ARTICLE|
|Author:||Salem, Mohamed S.; Belal, Mohamed H.; Nour, Mahmoud E.; Sayed, Emad A.|
|Publication:||Advances in Environmental Biology|
|Date:||Jul 1, 2012|
|Previous Article:||An investigation on protective effects of vitamin E against lipopolysaccharide-induced fetal injuries in rat.|
|Next Article:||Spatial distribution of sandstorm disaster in Iran using numerical taxonomy model.|