Printer Friendly

Detecting biological warfare agents.

We developed a fiber-optic, microsphere-based, high-density array composed of 18 species-specific probe microsensors to identify biological warfare agents. We simultaneously identified multiple biological warfare agents in environmental samples by looking at specific probe responses after hybridization and response patterns of the multiplexed array.


Accurately detecting and identifying biological warfare agents (BWAs) is the focal point for countering bioterrorism. Current methods used to identify BWAs are primarily focused on a single target agent (1-10). In contrast, the fiber-optic, microsphere-based, multiplexed arrays described in this paper can rapidly screen and simultaneously identify multiple potential BWAs, enabling an efficient response to a bioterrorism attack. Such multiagent analysis is difficult because it is usually complicated by interferences between assays and the large number of BWA probes.

We developed a platform to simultaneously detect BWAs with an array composed of DNA probe-functionalized microspheres that are randomly distributed onto microwells generated on the end of an etched coherent optical fiber bundle (11,12) that contains 6,000-50,000 individual fibers. Methods are described more fully in the Appendix, available online at EID/vol11no10/05-0269_app.htm. A multiplexed array was fabricated by distributing up to 18 different microsphere sensors into the optical fiber array with species-specific 50-mer DNA probes corresponding to 6 BWAs of interest (Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, Francisella tularensis, Brucella melitensis, Clostridium botulinum, and vaccinia virus) and 1 BWA simulant, Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki, with each organism represented by at least 2 probe sequences (online Appendix Table 1). All probe sequences were designed with software by Illumina, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA), and the specificity of the probe sequences was checked against GenBank by using BLAST to have minimal cross-hybridization potential. Employing multiple probes for each BWA reduces the potential for both false-negative and false-positive results in environmental samples. The inherent redundancy of each probe type on the array, because each microsphere type has many replicates, provides additional confidence in detection and enhances the signal-to-noise ratio. Because the assembly process for the arrays is random, each bead type is encoded with an identifying optical bar code (11,12) created by entrapping dyes in various combinations within microspheres, to differentiate microsphere probe types from one another.

To ensure sensitive detection of BWAs with high accuracy, the performance of this multiplexed, high-density array was assessed by examining the detection limits and specificity of probes with Cy3-labeled synthetic targets (the synthetic target is a 50-mer oligonucleotide complementary to the probe). We modified our previous protocol of microsensor preparation (12) by using an increased concentration of cyanuric chloride solution in the probe activation step to achieve a more complete and efficient coupling of DNA probes to microspheres. The improved microsensor preparation enabled a detection limit as low as 10 fmol/L (in 50 [micro]L volume) within 30 min hybridization time (data not shown). While the probes were selected to avoid the formation of secondary structures, such structures were not completely eliminated and probably affected the hybridization efficiency, resulting in higher detection limits for some probes on the array. To evaluate probe specificity, arrays containing beads with only a single probe type were exposed sequentially to the synthetic complementary target as well as to all noncomplementary targets. Cross-reactions were observed between probes from the same organism such as BA1/BA2, BA5/BA6, BTK1/BTK2, YP1/YP2, and FT1/FT2 (probes are abbreviated according to the organism from which they were derived: BA, B. anthracis; YP, Y. pestis; FT, F. tularensis; BM, Brucella melitensis, CB; C. botulinum; VA, vaccinia virus; and BTK, Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki; details in online Appendix Table 2) because some of the sequences for each probe pair overlapped, as probes were designed to be specific to the same target gene of the BWA. While in some applications cross-reactions are undesirable, in the present context the cross-reactions between probes from the same BWA confirmed each BWA in the sample. In addition, some minor cross-reactions between probe types from different BWAs were observed because of sequence similarity in spite of the careful probe design for each BWA (online Appendix Table 2). These cross-reactions could be advantageous, since they generated a unique response pattern across all the probes on the multiplexed array for each target BWA and provided additional information to identify BWAs. As a result, any BWA can be simultaneously identified with this multiplexed array by looking at the high signals resulting from the specific response of each individual species-specific probe as well as the response pattern across the array.

To sensitively detect target BWAs, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used as an amplification step before hybridization on the multiplexed array platform. Amplification was essential, especially when BWAs were present at trace levels in environmental samples (see below). Primer pairs that corresponded to each of the target sequences were designed specifically for each BWA (online Appendix Table 1). Each primer pair amplified the respective BWA sequence from an autoclaved bacterial culture (online Appendix Table 3) during asymmetric PCR. Figure 1 shows the detection of PCR products derived from each individual primer pair based on single bead-type arrays. The variation of the probe responses to PCR products can be explained by the different concentrations of the autoclaved bacterial cultures used as templates in PCR, the varying efficiency of primer pairs, or the potential of PCR products to form secondary structures. While carefully designed and optimized to have PCR products with a shorter length (147-201 bp), some of the amplified PCR fragments might form secondary structures (e.g., BA5). The formation of secondary structures makes the DNA fragments that were complementary to the array probe sequences inaccessible for hybridization. For these targets, the hybridization efficiency was affected, giving low hybridization responses to PCR products. In addition, the position of the target sequences within the PCR amplicons could affect hybridization efficiency. Oligonucleotide probes complementary to the middle part or the 5' position of PCR products showed lower hybridization efficiencies than did target sequences close to the 3' positions. This observation was likely related to steric hindrance that led to less accessibility of PCR products to the probe sequences on the array.


To assess the limit of detection with real bacterial sampLes, 10-fold serial dilutions were made from the autoclaved cultures of each BWA (online Appendix Table 3) and used for PCR followed by array hybridization (summarized in the Table). Specificity tests of primer pairs were performed by applying each primer pair to other nontarget bacterial cultures individually, and no nonspecific amplifications were observed. To investigate the ability to simultaneously detect BWAs, multiplex PCR was used to analyze mixed bacterial cultures that contained multiple BWAs, e.g., B. anthracis mixed with B. thuringiensis kurstaki and Y. pestis mixed with F. tularensis, in varying ratios. We prepared 2 primer pools for the 7 BWAs of interest, and each pool contained 1 primer pair specific for each BWA. Figure 2 shows the amplification of BWAs in each mixed culture sample using primer pools I and II. The amplified PCR products were subjected to multiplexed array detection with each BWA represented by at least 2 probe types. The online Appendix Figure shows the results of simultaneous detection of BWAs in different mixed culture samples after amplification with primer pool I (online Appendix Figure, panel A) and pool II (online Appendix Figure, panel B). For the mixtures of B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis kurstaki, both probes BTK1 and BTK2 gave positive signals, as did probes BA1, BA2, and BA4, which indicates the presence of B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis kurstaki. Since the primer pair specific for B. anthracis in primer pool I and pool II corresponded to the BA2 and BA4 sequences, respectively, no positive signals were observed from the other BA probes (BA3, BA5, and BA6); no cross-reactions were seen between them except for probes BA1 and BA2 (online Appendix Table 2). For mixtures of Y. pestis and F. tularensis, differentiating 2 bands (Figure 2B, lane 9 and lane 10) on the gel is difficult because the product size is similar; however, positive signals from the respective probes after hybridization showed these 2 BWAs in the mixed culture samples (online Appendix Figure, panel B). Array detection in conjunction with multiplex PCR is advantageous in that it not only simultaneously identifies target BWAs but also minimizes the possibility of misinterpreting PCR results because it adds an additional level of specificity. With gel analysis only, PCR results are usually complicated because of nonspecific amplification during multiplex PCR with environmental samples.


Since real environmental samples will likely involve complex matrices with many potential interferents, the performance of the multiplexed array was further assessed with wastewater spiked with individual autoclaved bacterial cultures of BWAs at various volumetric dilution factors (1:3 and 1:10) (online Appendix Table 3). Both primer pools were applied to all spiked wastewater samples for multiplex PCR. The probes on the multiplexed array gave positive responses only to the amplified PCR products of interest, without responding to any nonspecifically amplified products. Online Appendix Figure, panel C gives an example of array detection of the amplified BWAs from spiked wastewater samples (1:10 dilution) with primer pool I. BWAs seeded into wastewater at various dilution factors were all identified successfully within 30 minutes of hybridization.

In summary, this fiber-optic, microsphere-based array platform provides fast, sensitive, and simultaneous identification of BWAs with high accuracy. The high density of this array format can accommodate additional probe types while still maintaining a high redundancy for each probe type on the array. Additional probe types could be added to the array without affecting the performance of the existing microspheres. The ability to expand the probe types in the array opens up the opportunity to incorporate a large number of potential BWAs when their genome sequences become available. As a result, the multiplicity of arrays could be increased by incorporating an even broader class of potential BWAs and other pathogens, leading to a universal array for all pathogenic agents of interest.


We are grateful to Illumina, Inc. for designing the probe sequences and primers and the Naval Research Laboratory for providing the autoclaved cultures of BWAs used in this study.

This work is funded by the Office of Naval Research through a grant from the Technical Support Working Group.


(1.) Brightwell G, Pearce M, Leslie D. Development of internal controls for PCR detection of Bacillus anthracis. Mol Cell Probes. 1998;12:367-77.

(2.) Lee MA, Brightwell G, Leslie D, Bird H, Hamilton A. Fluorescent detection techniques for real-time multiplex strand-specific detection of Bacillus anthracis using rapid PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 1999;87:218-23.

(3.) Volokhov D, Rasooly A, Chumakov K, Chizhikov V. Identification of Listeria species by microarray-based assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:4720-8.

(4.) Volokhov D, Pomerantsev A, Kivovich V, Rasooly A, Chizhikov V. Identification of Bacillus anthracis by multiprobe microarray hybridization. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;49:163-71.

(5.) Belgrader P, Elkin CJ, Brown SB, Nasarabadi SN, Langlois RG, Milanovich FP, et al. A reusable flow-through polymerase chain reaction instrument for the continuous monitoring of infectious biological agents. Anal Chem. 2003;75:3446-50.

(6.) Lindstrom M, Keto R, Markkula A, Nevas M, Hielm S, Korkeala H. Multiplex PCR assay for detection and identification of Clostridium botulinum types A, B, E, and F in food and fecal material. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:5694-9.

(7.) Yang JM, Bell J, Huang Y, Tirado M, Thomas D, Forster AH, et al. An integrated, stacked microlaboratory for biological agent detection with DNA and immunoassays. Biosens Bioelectron. 2002;17:605-18.

(8.) Lagally ET, Scherer JR, Blazej RG, Toriello NM, Diep BA, Ramchandani M, et al. Integrated portable genetic analysis microsystem for pathogen/infectious disease detection. Anal Chem. 2004;76:3162-70.

(9.) Ji J, Schanzle JA, Tabacco MB. Real-time detection of bacterial contamination in dynamic aqueous environments using optical sensors. Anal Chem. 2004;76:1411-8.

(10.) Tims TB, Lim DV. Rapid detection of Bacillus anthracis spores directly from powders with an evanescent wave fiber-optic biosensor. J Microbiol Methods. 2004;59:127-30.

(11.) Walt DR. Bead-based fiber-optic arrays. Science. 2000;287:451-2.

(12.) Ferguson JA, Steemers FJ, Walt DR. High-density fiber-optic DNA random microsphere array. Anal Chem. 2000;72:5618-24.

Linan Song, * Soohyoun Ahn, * and David R. Walt *

* Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA

Ms Song is a graduate student in chemistry at Tufts University. Her research interests include applications of DNA microarrays and microarray-based detection of biological warfare agents and other infectious biological agents.

Address for correspondence: David R. Walt, 62 Talbot Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA; fax: 617-627-3443; email:
Table. Detection limits of real samples determined with
polymerase chain reaction followed by array detection

Organism DNA copies/mL

Bacillus anthracis [10.sup.3]
B. thuringiensis kurstaki [10.sup.2]
Vaccinia virus [10.sup.2]
Yersinia pestis [10.sup.2]
Francisella tularensis [10.sup.3]
Clostridium botulinum [10.sup.3]
COPYRIGHT 2005 U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:identifying biological warfare agents
Author:Walt, David R.
Publication:Emerging Infectious Diseases
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Oct 1, 2005
Previous Article:Gastroenteritis outbreak in British troops, Iraq.
Next Article:Rapid West Nile virus antigen detection.

Related Articles
Biological warfare facility debated.
Germ wars: beset by controversy, the U.S. military is using genetic engineering to design defenses against biological weapons.
Invisible foot soldiers.
Preparing for chemical and biological terrorist attacks.
Historical trends related to bioterrorism: an empirical analysis.
Addressing the potential threat of bioterrorism: value added to an improved public health infrastructure.
Researchers Seek New Ways To Protect Chem-Bio Victims.
Army news service (May 19, 2005): detection device to revolutionize biological warfare.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters