Printer Friendly

Design software for application-specific microfluidic devices.

Microfluidics-based lab-on-a-chip systems, which feature miniaturization of biological separation and assay techniques, are rapidly transforming biochemical analysis and high-throughput screening. Microfluidic system design requires expertise in materials, chemistry, biology, and engineering, and understanding the complex interplay between variables that influence and limit system performance is difficult without computational assistance. Modeling approaches based on 3-dimensional numerical simulations provide detailed information regarding spatiotemporal variations of the field variables but are computationally very expensive for system-level analysis. Design-modeling tools are needed that rapidly simulate the complex underlying phenomena such as electroosmosis, electrophoresis, sample dispersion, mixing, and biochemical reactions without significantly compromising accuracy (1-5). In addition, these design tools must be easily usable by the microfluidic community, which comprises scientists and engineers from a variety of disciplines. To meet these challenges, we developed integrated design software that allows rapid layout of microfluidic channel networks, fast system performance simulation using a system solver, and the ability to easily reconfigure chip layout to meet specifications. We illustrate the application of the software to improve the design for an electrokinetic immunoassay chip.

The software design follows a modified form of the traditional client-server architecture. The user interacts with a graphical user interface (GUI) front-end (client). Fig. 1 shows a screenshot of the GUI. The microfluidic lab-on-a-chip system is represented as a network of interconnected components that can be assembled from a component library. The sequence of operations required for the creation of the microfluidic network, analysis, and visualization of results using the GUI is as follows:

(1) Creation of the microfluidic network: The components (such as sample reservoirs, straight channels, bends, biosensors, and interconnects such as Y-, T-, and cross junctions) are selected from the component library and assembled into a network using a drag-and-drop method.

(2) Problem specification: Geometric properties for components (channel length, breadth, and depth, turn radius and angle, well diameter) and operating conditions (applied voltage and pressure, flow rate, and injected analyte concentrations, as appropriate for the problem under consideration) are specified for the components. The property database contains physicochemical property data for commonly used buffers, reagents, and analytes (density and viscosity of buffers; electrical conductivity, and electrokinetic mobility and molecular diffusivity of analytes) and is fully integrated with the GUI.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

(3) Solution and visualization: The performance is simulated using the system solver, and the results are analyzed using the visualization toolkit, which allows the results from the simulation to be displayed in a variety of tabular and graphical formats.

The GUI employs the hierarchical model-view-controller (1VIVC) architecture (6) to achieve the user-friendliness, flexibility, and extensibility needed. NWC programming uses 3-way factoring, whereby objects of different software classes take over the operations related to the application domain (model), the display of the applications state (view), and the user interaction with the model and the view (controller). The NWC architecture is aimed at exploiting the benefits associated with modular components in the software. The GUI has been developed with the Java TM programming language using standard Java libraries and the included Swing toolkit (7).

(4) System solver: The system solver uses a combination of various modeling approaches for a rapid simulation of the microfluidic chip performance. This mixed-methodology approach uses an integral method to simulate fluid flow and electric field, a method of moments-based analytical solution to compute analyte dispersion, and a Fourier series-based analytical solution to compute microfluidic mixing based on laminar diffusion. These disparate models have been integrated in the system solver and validated against both experimental data and detailed 3-dimensional numerical models. The system solver shows a substantial improvement in computational speed (2-4 orders of magnitude) over the 3-dimensional models without appreciably compromising accuracy (error <10%). Details of the models and validation studies have been described elsewhere (4,8-10). A brief explanation of these models is given below:

* Fluid flow: Pressure-driven flow is calculated by solving the Navier-Stokes and continuity conservation equations in their integral forms. An implicit iterative numerical solution scheme based on the SIMPLE (semi-implicit method for pressure-linked equations) algorithm (11) is used. Details of the implementation are discussed elsewhere (8).

* Electric field: The electric current conservation law is solved at every component with a constitutive equation to compute currents and voltages. These equations are used to compute the electroosmotic and electrophoretic flow velocity.

* Analyte transport: An analytical model based on the method of moments approach has been developed to characterize the dispersion induced by combined pressure and electrokinetic-driven flow. In addition, the system solver uses a combination of numerical schemes and analytical approaches to simulate mixing due to laminar diffusion and biochemical reactions; specifically, the method of lines (MOL) and 2-compartment models for biochemical reactions, and a Fourier series-based model for analyte mixing.

We present the use of the microfluidic design software to improve the design of an electrokinetic microfluidic device for an on-chip assay of the drug theophylline (Th) in serum samples. The assay involves on-chip mixing of serum samples with a labeled tracer compound and reaction with a selective antibody. This reaction is followed by an electrophoresis-based separation step to isolate and quantify the reactants and products. This immunoassay method is appropriate for incorporation into a microfluidic format and allows for rapid separation, because of the short separation distances. Starting with the microfluidic device previously demonstrated (12), we applied the software to rapidly explore alternative design concepts to improve device performance and demonstrate the ability to create a lab-on-a-chip for a real clinical analysis using a simulation-based design approach. Similar analysis using an analog hardware description language (Verilog-A) has been previously reported (13).

The operation of the competitive immunoassay chip is a multistep process that includes (a) mixing of serum sample containing Th with fluorescenn-labeled Th tracer (Th *), carried out in the microfluidic channel and based on laminar diffusion; (b) reaction of the resulting mixture with an anti-Th antibody (Ab), which allows Th and Th * to compete for a limited number of antibody-binding sites; (c) electrokinetic injection of the solution containing the Ab-Th * complex produced in the reaction, as well as the unreacted Th*, into the separation channel, where they are separated by electrophoresis; and (d) detection of the fluorescent species (Th * and Ab-Th *) by laser-induced fluorescence.

The chip layout was created in the layout editor, using the component library and the drag-and-drop methodology. The layout parameters (channel dimensions, connectivity) and operating conditions (voltages and concentrations) were specified, and the performance of the chip was simulated. All channels had a rectangular cross-section with a uniform depth of 20 microns. The original layout had channels with widths of 52-236 microns, and the same widths were used in the modified layout. Th and Th * in the sample were specified in the system design software as separate species with identical molecular diffusivity (3.3 x [10.sup.-10] [m.sup.2]/s) and electrokinetic mobility [2.84 x [10.sup.-8] [m.sup.2]/(V s)]. The corresponding properties for the antibody (Ab) were 4.0 x [10.sup.-11] [m.sup.2]/s (molecular diffusivity) and 4.45 x [10.sup.-8] [m.sup.2]z/(V s) (electrokinetic mobility) (14). The binding between Th and Ab was assumed to be irreversible and complete. An electric field of 770 V/cm was used for electrophoretic separation. The performance was characterized by the extent of mixing/ reaction and by the efficiency of separation, which is characterized by the separation resolution, peak height, variance, and time for separation. The layout was reconfigured using the layout editor to minimize the chip footprint. The modified layout (3.5 cm x 3.5 cm) occupies <25% of the area of the original chip (7.6 cm x 7.6 cm), and the time required for electrophoretic separation was decreased by more than 50% relative to the original design (12), thereby decreasing the overall assay time. This reconfiguration decreased the separation resolution, but the resulting resolution was still sufficient to resolve the species bands while limiting the band-broadening induced by dispersion. In addition, the signal amplitude increased by 11.5% and 5% for Ab-Th * and Th *, respectively. The degree of mixing for the antibody:

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1)

where y is the widthwise coordinate, w is the channel width, c is the concentration profile along the channel width, and [c.sub.avg] is the average concentration along the width, was also improved to 100%. The entire analysis (including layout generation and problem setup) was completed in approximately 4 h, more than 2 orders of magnitude faster than currently available techniques. The improvements are summarized in Table 1. In retrospect, the original system was substantially overdesigned, a problem that is common to several microfluidic systems currently available today and is attributable primarily to a lack of design tools.

In summary, the design software we describe is useful for estimating device performance and creating microfluidic chip layouts; these layouts can be rapidly modified to design chips that meet performance requirements. We used the software to improve the design of a microfluidic immunoassay chip. The resulting design occupied <25% of the area of the original chip, and the time required for electrophoretic separation was decreased by more than 50% relative to the original design, allowing for a faster assay. This process is more than 2 orders of magnitude faster than conventional design techniques and is ideally suited for design optimization of microfluidic lab-on-a-chip systems.

Grant/ funding support: This work was supported in part by funding from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (contract no. NNC04CA05C) and the National Institutes of Health (contract no. 1R43H0004290-01).

Financial disclosures: A patent application for the technology used in the software described in the article is currently pending with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

DOI : 10.1373/clinchem.2007.090498

References

(1.) Chatterjee AN, Aluru NR. Combined circuit/device modeling and simulation of integrated microfluidic systems. J Microelectromech Syst 2005;14:81-95.

(2.) Zhang TH, Chakrabarty K, Fair RB. Behavioral modeling and performance evaluation of microelectrofluidics-based PCR systems using SystemC. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 2004;23:843-58.

(3.) Chakrabarty K, Su F. Digital Microfluidic Biochips: Synthesis, Testing, and Reconfiguration Techniques. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006:228pp.

(4.) Wang Y, Bedekar A, Krishnamoorthy S, Siddhaye S, Sundaram S. System-level modeling and simulation of biochemical assays in lab-on-a-chip devices. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2007;3:307.

(5.) Chakrabarty K, Zeng J. Design Automation Methods and Tools for Microfluidics-Based Biochips. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2006:300pp.

(6.) Cai RK, Gaurav Pal. HMVC: The Layered Pattern for Developing Strong Client Tiers. Java World 2000.

(7.) Java Technology. http://java.sun.com (accessed April 11, 2007).

(8.) Bedekar AS, Wang Y, Krishnamoorthy S, Siddhaye SS, Sundaram S. System-level simulation of flow-induced dispersion in lab-on-a-chip systems. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 2006;25:294-304.

(9.) Wang Y, Lin Q, Mukherjee T. A model for laminar diffusion-based complex electrokinetic passive micromixers. Lab on a Chip 2005;5:877-87.

(10.) Wang Y, Lin Q, Mukherjee T. System-oriented dispersion models of general-shaped electrophoresis microchannels. Lab on a Chip 2004;4:453-63.

(11.) Patankar SV. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow: New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980:214pp.

(12.) Chiem NH, Harrison DJ. Microchip systems for immunoassay: an integrated immunoreactor with electrophoretic separation for serum theophylline determination. Clin Chem 1998;44:591-8.

(13.) Wang Y, Magargle RM, Lin Q, Hoburg JF, Mukherjee T. System-oriented modeling and simulation of biofluidic lab-on-a-Chip. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Vol. 2. Seoul, Korea, 2005;1280-3.

(14.) Magargle R. Robust design methods for microfluidic lab-on-a-chip systems [PhD Thesis], Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 2007.

Aditya S. Bedekar, * Yi Wang, Sachin S. Siddhaye, Siva Krishnamoorthy, and Stephen F. Malin

CFD Research Corporation, Huntsville, AL;

* address correspondence to this author at: CFD Research Corporation, 215 Wynn Dr., Ste. 501, Huntsville, AL 35805; fax 256-726-4806, e-mail asb@cfdrc.com
Table 1. Comparison of performance of original and improved layouts.

Parameters Original

Mixing degree, % Ab Th/Th *
 98.3% 100%
Separation time, s Ab-Th * Th *
 15.87 22.53
Variance, [micro][m.sup.2] 148770 116 600
Signal amplitude (normalized) 1 5.91
Separation distance, cm 5.6
Chip area, [cm.sup.2] 7.6 x 7.6

Parameters Improved

Mixing degree, % Ab Th/Th *
 100% 100%
Separation time, s Ab-Th * Th *
 6.554 9.303
Variance, [micro][m.sup.2] 119 700 106 000
Signal amplitude (normalized) 1.115 6.188
Separation distance, cm 2.75
Chip area, [cm.sup.2] 3.5 x 3.5
COPYRIGHT 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Abstracts of Oak Ridge Posters
Author:Bedekar, Aditya S.; Wang, Yi; Siddhaye, Sachin S.; Krishnamoorthy, Siva; Malin, Stephen F.
Publication:Clinical Chemistry
Date:Nov 1, 2007
Words:2077
Previous Article:Rapid exonuclease digestion of PCR-amplified targets for improved microarray hybridization.
Next Article:An analytical method for size and shape characterization of blood lipoproteins.
Topics:


Related Articles
Transparent pipes shape microstructures. (Light Splash).
Improving patient safety through medical device interoperability and high confidence software; proceedings.
New lab-on-a-chip device which runs on music.
Rapid exonuclease digestion of PCR-amplified targets for improved microarray hybridization.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters