Printer Friendly

Desarrollo y capacidad depredadora de Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) bajo diferentes temperaturas.

Resumen: Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) es uno de los enemigos naturales del pulgon de la hoja del maiz Rhopalosiphum maidis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) y tiene potencial aplicacion en el control biologico contra esta plaga. Fue investigado el efecto de la temperatura sobre el desarrollo y capacidad depredadora de C. externa alimentada con ninfas de R. maidis. Huevos frescos del crisopido fueron mantenidos a 15, 20, 25 o 30[grados]C bajo una humedad relativa de 70% y 12 h fotofase. Fueron evaluadas la duracion del periodo embrionario, la duracion y viabilidad de la fase larvaria (primer, segundo y tercer estadio), fases de prepupa, pupa y adulta del depredador. La duracion de todas las etapas del desarrollo se redujo al aumentar la temperatura, mientras que la viabilidad de todas las fases alcanzo el 100% a los 20 y 25[grados]C. El umbral de temperatura y el valor de la constante termica K obtenidos para el ciclo de vida completo (de huevo a adulto) fueron 10,7[grados]C y 377,8 grados-dia, respectivamente. Independiente de la temperatura, el consumo de ninfas de R. maidis por C. externa aumento con el desarrollo de las larvas. A los 20 y 25[grados]C, el numero promedio de pulgones consumidos durante toda la fase larvaria alcanzo aproximadamente 350 especimenes. Se concluye que el desarrollo de las formas inmaduras de C. externa alimentada con R. maidis, asi como la viabilidad y su capacidad depredadora, se favorecen a temperaturas entre 20 y 25[grados]C.

Palabras clave: Control biologico. Pulgon verde del maiz. Depredador. Crisopidos. Requerimientos termicos.

Abstract: Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) is one of the natural enemies of the com leaf aphid Rhopalosiphum maidis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and has potential application in the biological control of that pest. The effect of' temperature on the development and the predatory capacity of this chrysopid fed with R. maidis nymphs was investigated. Fresh eggs of C. externa were maintained at 15, 20, 25 or 30[degrees]C under 70% relative humidity and 12 h photophase, and the duration of the embryonic stage, as well as the duration and viability of the larval (first, second and third instars), prepupal, pupal and adult forms of the predator were evaluated. The duration of each of these stages decreased with increasing temperature, whilst the viabilities of all forms attained 100% at 20 and 25[degrees]C. The threshold temperature and the value of the thermal constant K obtained for the complete life cycle (egg to adult) were, respectively, 10.7[degrees]C and 377.8 degree-days. Independent of temperature, the consumption of R. maidis nymphs by C. externa increased as the larvae reached maturity. At 20 and 25[degrees]C the average number of aphids consumed during the complete larval stage was maximal at approximately 350 specimens. It is concluded, therefore, that the development of the immature forms of C. externa fed on R. maidis as well as its viability and predatory capacity, were favored at temperatures between 20 and 25[degrees]C.

Key words: Biological control. Corn leaf aphid. Predator. Green lacewing. Thermal requirements.

Development and predatory capacity of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) larvae at different temperatures

Introduction

The corn leaf aphid Rhopalosiphum maidis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) is regarded as a specific pest of the Poaceae since it has been found to infest more than 30 genera belonging to that family (McColloch 1921; Robinson 1992; Kuo et al. 2006; Razmjou and Golizadeh 2010). Moreover, in Brazil, R. maidis is distributed mainly in regions where sorghum and maize ("safrinha" type) are cultivated (Fonseca et al. 2004). In maize, infestation begins in isolated plants but spreads to the whole crop during the vegetative phase, particularly through tassel emergence, at which stage the value of the culture may not be reduced significantly (Gassen 1996). In contrast, considerable economic loss can result when infestation occurs prior to inflorescence, especially if it is associated with water stress or with the period of fertilization and grain filling (Everly 1960; Brodbeck and Strong 1987; Honek 1991; Al-Eryan and El-Tabbakh 2004; Kuo et al. 2006). Additionally, transmission of viruses by the aphid may inflict considerable indirect damage to the culture (Farrell and Stufkens 1992; Huggett et al. 1999; Almeida et al. 2001; SO et al. 2010).

The continuous use of broad spectrum insecticides in the control of aphids has intensified the occurrence of these insect pests and the emergence of others (Gahukar 1993; Oliveira et al. 2012). In order to minimize the environmental impact of such chemicals, alternative control measures have been employed including biological control. Amongst the natural enemies of R. maidis are larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera Chrysopidae) (Alburquerque et al. 1994; Tauber et al. 2000; Fonseca et al. 2001; Maia et al. 2004; Barbosa et al. 2008; Oliveira et al. 2012). Although such larvae appear to be very effective, information regarding the population dynamics of the predator is very limited and this constitutes an impediment to its practical application in biological control. Indeed, many control programs crucially depend on an understanding of the biology and physical requirements (mainly temperature) of the predators (Cividanes 2000).

In view of the relevance of C. externa in the biological control of R. maidis, the objective of the present study was to determine the effect of different temperatures on the development and predatory rate of these chrysopids when fed with their natural prey.

Materials and methods

Laboratory-reared C. externa adults (generation [F.sub.4]) were maintained in glass jars (20 cm high x 20 cm diameter) at 25 [+ or -] 2[degrees]C, 70 [+ or -] 10% relative humidity and 12 h photophase, and fed with a mixture of beer yeast and honey (1x1 w/w). R. maidis aphids were reared on leaf segments obtained from sorghum plants (cultivar BRS303; 80 cm height) placed in plastic recipients (50 mL) containing 25 mL of water and fixed with acrylic.

The effect of temperature on the development of C. externa was studied by placing 15 freshly oviposited eggs into glass dishes (8.5 cm high x 2.5 cm diameter) and incubating at different temperatures (15, 20, 25 and 30 [+ or -] 1[degrees]C) under the conditions previously described. The duration of the embryonic stage, as well as the durations and viabilities of the larval (first, second and third instars), prepupal, pupal and adult forms of the chrysopid were evaluated. The predatory capacity of C. externa was investigated by feeding first, second and third instars with an amount of the prey (in the form of 15, 30 and 120 third and fourth instars of aphid nymphs, respectively) that had been previously determined to be larger than the daily requirements of the individual lacewing instars. Each day, any aphid nymphs that remained in the dishes were removed and replaced with new individuals.

Data were submitted to analysis of variance and polynomial regression with the aid of SAEG 8.0 (Ribeiro Jr. 2001) and Windows Exce 1 98 software. The lowest temperature of development, or base temperature (bT), for the embryonic, larval and all off of the juvenile stages of the predator were calculated using the method of Haddad et al. (1999) based on the duration/time hyperbola and its reciprocal. The thermal requirements of C. externa were determined using the equation K = D (T-Tb), in which K is the thermal constant (expressed in degree-days), D is the time taken (days) to complete development, and T is the temperature at which development occurred (Wigglesworth 1972).

Results and discussion

The duration of the embryonic stage was 15.1 days at 15[degrees]C, whereas at higher temperatures this stadium was considerably reduced and lasted for only 3.0 days at 30[degrees]C. The variation of the duration of the embryonic stage with increasing temperatures is shown in Figure 1 together with the fitted second-degree equation. Similar responses have been reported by other researchers (Maia et al. 2000; Fonseca et al. 2001; Figueira et al. 2002), who observed longer embryonic stages for C. externa at lower temperatures.

The rates of development of the individual instars and, consequently, the total larval stage of C. externa were also highly influenced by increasing temperatures (Figs. 2A-D). Thus, in the interval between 15 and 20[degrees]C, the duration of the larval stage diminished by 18.4 days, whilst between 25 and 30[degrees]C, the duration was reduced by 2.4 days (Fig. 2D). These results corroborated previous findings (Maia et al. 2000; Fonseca et al. 2001; Figueira et al. 2002; Oliveira et al. 2010; Lavagnini and Freitas 2012) concerning the sensitivity of C. externa instars to low temperatures. The viabilities of all instars were 100% at 20 and 25[degrees]C (Table 1), but were reduced to approximately 93% at 15 and 30[degrees]C. Fonseca et al. (2001) also observed higher mortalities of C. externa when immature stages were maintained at 15 and 30[degrees]C. High temperatures may cause protein denaturation or metabolic imbalance due to the accumulation of toxins, whereas low temperatures can induce the formation of crystals in the body of the predator leading to difficulties in locomotion and, ultimately, death (Chapman 1998). However, according to Campbell et al. (1974), the deleterious effects of extreme temperatures only occur when such conditions are applied constantly.

The lengths of the prepupal and pupal stages of C. externa were also reduced as the temperature increased (Figs. 2E, F). However, the prepupal stage was less sensitive to temperature variation in comparison with the late instar form, since viability remained at 100% between 15 and 25[degrees]C and only diminished to 98.2% at 30[degrees]C (Table 1). With respect to pupae, viability was in the range 92.3 and 100% between 20 and 30[degrees]C, but decreased remarkably to 41.7% at 15[degrees]C. The sensitivity of pupae to low temperatures may be associated with the physiological problems described by Chapman (1998).

The complete biological cycle of C. externa from egg to adult ranged from 92.8 days at 15[degrees]C to 20.1 days at 30[degrees]C, representing an overall reduction of almost 73 days (Fig. 3).

It is clear that the lacewing is particularly sensitive to temperatures between 15 and 20[degrees]C, whilst between 25 and 30[degrees]C the rate of development tended to be more stable (Fig. 3). The overall viabilities of C. externa during the biological cycle (egg to adult) were 41.7% at 15[degrees]C, 100% at 20 and 25 [degrees]C, and 85.7% at 30[degrees]C. The poor viability observed at the lowest temperature may be attributed to the high mortality observed during the pupal stage and to the reduced capacity for wing growth during the pharate stage). Indeed, the viability of C. externa was 50% higher at 30[degrees]C compared with 15 [degrees]C, although the most appropriate conditions for the development of this predator would be 20 or 25[degrees]C.

The predatory capacity of C. externa depended on the phase of development and the temperature (Fig. 4). At 25[degrees]C, the daily consumption of R. maidis nymphs by third instar predators (78.4) was 18-fold higher than that of their first instar counterparts (4.4). This finding is in agreement with that of Fonseca et al. (2001) who observed that as C. externa developed (at 24[degrees]C) the consumption of Schizaphis graminum increased 22 fold. Figure 4 also reveals that the daily consumption of nymphs typically increased with increasing temperature. Thus, in the interval 15-30[degrees]C, there was a progressive increase in the number of prey consumed by C. externa with respect to the total larval stage, such that, the daily consumption at 30[degrees]C was 4 times greater than at 15[degrees]C. First instar predators, however, did not follow the general trend but rather showed a tendency to consume fewer nymphs at 30[degrees]C than at 25[degrees]C.

With respect to the goodness of fit of the regression lines shown in Fig. 4, Fonseca et al. (2001) also observed that the variation in the determination coefficient ([r.sup.2]) increased progressively from the first to third instar as a function of development (Figs. 4A-C). Although the value of [r.sup.2] for the first instar was on 1 y 0.74, when the three instars were analyzed in conjunction (as larval stage) the value of [r.sup.2] was 0.99 (Fig. 4D). On this basis it is predicted that, under field conditions, the predatory capacity of C. externa might be favored by higher temperatures. Knowledge regarding the effect of temperature on the consumption of prey by C. externa can also contribute to the management of laboratory-reared predators and therefore, to the increased effectiveness of biological control programs, particularly when the availability of prey is limited.

The total numbers of prey consumed by the individual instars of C. externa were highly influenced by temperature (Table 2). For example, the maximum consumption of the first instar (18.1 nymphs in total) was observed at 15[degrees]C, and this was probably due to the lengthy duration of this stage under such conditions, i.e. the larvae were fed for a longer period. Such a hypothesis does not explain the unexpectedly large reduction in consumption observed at 20[degrees]C, however. With respect to the second instar, highest consumption (42-44 nymphs) occurred at 15 and 30[degrees]C. Whilst the explanation given previously for the first instar at 15[degrees]C applies here, the high consumption of nymphs by the second instar at 30[degrees]C can be justified only by the intensification of metabolism and predatory activity, since the duration of this stage was much shorter at the higher temperature (Table 2). The highest number of prey (301-302 nymphs) consumed by the third instar of C. externa was at 20 and 25[degrees]C.

The overall consumption of prey by the larval stage as a whole was essentially determined by the predatory capacity of the third instar, which was typically 20 times greater than that of the first and approximately seven times greater than that of the second instar. Whilst the total consumption of prey by the first instar at 20[degrees]C was half of that observed at 25[degrees]C, the difference was compensated by the increased consumption of the second instar at 20[degrees]C. Additionally, there were no differences in the numbers of prey consumed by the third instar at 20 and 25[degrees]C. Thus, the highest consumption of prey by the larval stage (348-351 nymphs) occurred at 20 and 25 [degrees]C, demonstrating that such conditions would the most favorable for biological control of R. maidis by the predator.

The thermal requirements of C. externa, as represented by Tb and K values determined in the present study, varied according to the developmental stage of the predator (Table 3; Fig. 5), and were similar to those reported by Maia et al. (2000) for C. externa fed on S. graminum. The rate of development of C. externa was affected by temperature, with the duration of the immature stages being significantly reduced at increasing temperatures (Fig. 5). C. externa was particularly sensitive to temperature changes between 15-20[degrees]C, since an incremental temperature increase in this range had a much greater effect on the duration of the immature stages than a similar variation at 25[degrees]C or above. The determination coefficients of the regression equations were large at all stages, and varied from 98.8 to 99.7% demonstrating that the duration of development of these chrysopids is intimately correlated with the variation in temperature (Fig. 5).

In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that the most favorable temperatures for the development of the immature forms of C. externa are 20 and 25[grados]C, conditions in which the consumption of R. maidis is also at a maximum. The beneficial effect of higher temperatures on immature forms of C. externa was confirmed by the bT and K values, which varied according to the development stages of the predator.

Literature cited

ALBUQUERQUE, G. S.; TAUBER, C. A.; TAUBER, M, J. 1994. Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): Life history and potential for biological control in Central and South America. Biological Control 4 (2): 8-13.

AL-ERYAN, M. A. S.; EL-TABBAKH, S. S. 2004. Forecasting yield of com, Zea mays infested with corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis. Journal of Applied Entomology 128 (4): 312-315.

ALMEIDA, A. C. L.; OLIVEIRA E.; RESENDE R. O. 2001. Fatores relacionados a disseminacao do virus do mosaico comum do milho. Fitopatologia Brasileira 26 (4): 766-769.

BARBOSA, L. R.; CARVALHO C. F.; SOUZA B.; AUAD. A. M. 2008. Eficiencia de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) no controle de Myzus persicae (Sulzer, 1776) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) em pimentao (Capsicum annum L.). Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 32 (4): 1113-1119.

BRODBECK, B.; STRONG, D. 1987. Amino acid nutrition of herbivorous insects and stress to host plants, pp. 347-364. In: Barbosa, R; Schultz, J. C. (Eds.). Insect outbreaks. Academic Press, San Diego.

CAMPBELL, A.; FRAZER, B. D.; GILBERT, N.; GUITIERREZ, A. P; MACKAUER, M. 1974. Temperature requirements of some aphids and their parasites. Journal of Applied Entomology 11 (2): 431-438.

CHAPMAN, R. F. 1998. The insects: structure and function. Cambridge University Press, New York. 788 p.

CIVIDANES, F. J. 2000. Uso de graus-dia em entomologia: com particular referencia ao controle de percevejos pragas da soja. FUNEP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. 31 p.

EVERLY, R. T. 1960. Loss in com yield associated with the abundance of the com leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis, in Indiana. Journal of Economic Entomology 53 (5): 924-932.

FARRELL, J. A.; STUFKENS, M.W. 1992. Cereal aphid flights and barley yellow dwarf virus infection of cereals in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 20 (4): 407-412.

FIGUEIRA, L. K.; CARVALHO, C. F.; SOUZA, B. 2002. Influencia da temperatura sobre alguns aspectos biologicos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentada com ovos de Alabama argillacea (Hubner, 1818) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 26: 1439-1450.

FONSECA, A. R.; CARVALHO, C. F.; SOUZA, B. 2001. Capacidade predatoria e aspectos biologicos das fases imaturas de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentada com Schizaphis graminum (Rondani, 1852) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) em diferentes temperaturas. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 25 (2): 251-263.

FONSECA, A. R.; CRUZ, L; CARVALHO, C. E; SOUZA, B. 2004. Resistencia de genotipos de sorgo ao pulgao Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch, 1856) (Hemiptera: Aphididae): III. Efeito no desenvolvimento da planta. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 28 (3): 585-592.

GAHUKAR, R. T. 1993. Infestation levels of improved sorghum cultivars with Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch and Eublema gayneri Roths in Senegal. Tropical Agriculture 70 (2): 85-187.

GASSEN, D. N. 1996. Manejo de pragas associadas a cultura do milho. Aldeia Norte, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil. 134 p.

HADDAD, M. L., MORALES, R. C. B.; PARRA, J. R. P. 1999. MOBAE--Modelos bioestatisticos aplicados a entomologia (versao 1.0). Universidade de Sao Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. 29 p.

HONEK, A. 1991. Environment stress, plant quality and abundance of cereal aphids (Horn., Aphididae) on winter wheat. Journal of Applied Entomology 112 (1): 65-70.

HUGGETT, D. A. J.; LEATHER, S. R.; WALTERS, K. F. A. 1999. Suitability of the biomass crop Miscanthus sinensis as a host for the aphids Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) and Rhopalosiphum maidis (F.), and its susceptibility to the plant luteovirus barley yellow dwarf virus. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 1 (2): 143-149.

KUO, M. H.; CHIU, M. C.: PERNG, J. J. 2006. Temperature effects on life history traits of the corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Homoptera: Aphididae) on com in Taiwan. Applied Entomology Zoology 41: 171-177.

LAVAGNINI, T. C.; FREITAS, S. 2012. Capacidade reprodutiva e longevidade de Chrysoperla externa cujas fases imaturas foram submetidas a ambientes com diferentes temperaturas de criacao. Nucleus 9 (1): 131-136.

MAIA, W. J. M.; CARVALHO, C. F.; SOUZA, B. 2000. Exigencias termicas de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentada com Schizaphis graminum (Rondani, 1852) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) em condicoes de laboratorio. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 24 (1): 811-886.

MAIA, W. J. M.; CARVALHO, C. F.; CRUZ, L; SOUZA, B.; MAIA, T. J. A. F. 2004. Capacidade predatoria e aspectos biologicos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentada com Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch, 1856) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 28 (6): 1259-1268.

McCOLLOCH, J. W. The com leaf aphid (Aphis maidis Fitch) in Kansas. 1921. Journal of Economic Entomology 14: 89-941.

OLIVEIRA, S. A.; AUAD, A. M.; SOUZA, B.; SILVA, D. M.; CAIO A. C. 2010. Effect of temperature on the interaction between Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Siphaflava (Hemiptera: Aphididae). European Journal of Entomology 107: 183-188.

OLIVEIRA, S. A.; AUAD, A. M.; SOUZA, B.; FONSECA, M. G.; RESENDE, T. T. 2012. Population dynamics of Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in a silvopastoral system. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 179-182.

RAZMJOU, J.; GOLIZADEH, A. 2010. Performance of corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on selected maize hybrids under laboratory conditions. Applied Entomology and Zoology 45 (2): 267-274.

RIBEIRO Jr, J. I. 2001. SAEG Sistema para analises estatisticas e genetica, versao 8.0. Fundacao Arthur Bemardes, Vicosa, MG, Brazil. 301 p.

ROBINSON, J. 1992. Modes of resistance in barley seedlings to six aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) species. Journal of Economic Entomology 85 (6): 2510-2515.

SO, Y. S.; J. 1.; H. C.; BREWBAKER, J. L. 2010. Resistance to com leaf aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis_Fitch) in tropical com (Zea mays L.). Euphytica 172: 373-381.

TAUBER, M. J.; TAUBER, C. A.; DAANE, K. M.; HAGEN, K. S. 2000. Commercialization of predators: recent lessons from green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). American Entomologist 46 (1): 26-38.

WIGGLESWORTH, V. B. 1972. The principles of insect physiology, 7th ed. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. 827 p.

Received: 19-Feb-2014 * Accepted: 24-Mar-2015

ALYSSON R. FONSECA (1), CESAR F. CARVALHO (2), IVAN CRUZ (3), BRIGIDA SOUZA (4) and CARLOS C. ECOLE (5)

(1) Ph. D. Centro de Referencia Tecnica, Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG), 35501-170, Divinopolis, MG, Brazil. arodrigofonseca@hotmail. com. Correspondig author. (2) Ph. D. Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), 37200-000, Lavras, MG, Brazil. cfcarvatho@ den. ufla.br. (3) Ph. D. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (EMBRAPA), 35701-970, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil, ivancruz@cnpms.embrapa.br (4) Ph. D. Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), 37200-000, Lavras, MG, Brazil, brgsouza@den.ufla.br. (5) Ph. D. Instituto de Investigacao Agraria de Mocambique (HAM), Mavalane, Maputo, Mozambique, ccecole@gmail.com.

Table 1. Viabilities of individual instars, total larvae,
prepupae and pupae of Chrysoperla externa fed on Rhopalosiphum
maidis at different temperatures (70 [+ o -] 10% relative
humidity, 12 h photophase).

                                Viability (%)
Temperature
([degrees]C)    First instar   Second instar   Third instar

15                  100             100            92.3
20                  100             100            100
25                  100             100            100
30                  100            93.3            100

                       Viability (%)
Temperature
([degrees]C)    Larvae   Prepupae   Pupae

15               92.3      100      41.7
20               100       100       100
25               100       100       100
30               93.3      92.8     92.3

Table 2. Total numbers of Rhopalosiphum maidis consumed by
individual instars and during the whole larval stage of
Chrysoperla externa at different temperatures (70 [+ or -] 10%
relative humidity, 12 h photophase).

Temperature       Mean number of R. maidis ([+ or -] standard error)
([degrees]C)                     consumed by predator

                First instar     Second instar      Third instar

15            18.1 [+ or -] 0.8  42.3 [+ or -] 1.9  256.4 [+ or -] 4.9
20            9.5 [+ or -] 0.5   40.3 [+ or -] 1.4  301.1 [+ or -] 6.8
25            17.1 [+ or -] 0.9  28.5 [+ or -] 1.6  301.8 [+ or -] 5.7
30            11.1 [+ or -] 0.3  44.4 [+ or -] 3.1  245.7 [+ or -] 7.3
CV% (2)             17.5              20.4               8.6

Table 3. Threshold temperature (Tb), and thermal constant (k) of
Chrysoperla externa fed on Rhopalosiphum maidis (70 [+ or -] 10%
relative humidity, 12 h photophase).

                     Tb (a)                            Regression
Stages             ([degrees]C)   K (degree-days)      equation (b)

Eggs                  11.6            55.8         Y = 0.0179x-0.2081
Larvae                 9.2            169.9        Y = 0.0 059x-0.0540
Biological cycle      10.7            377.8        Y = 0.0026X-0.0283

Stages                [r.sup.2] (%)

Eggs                      99.7
Larvae                    98.8
Biological cycle          99.3

(a) Calculated using the Haddad et al. (1999) method.

(b) y' = 1/duration.
COPYRIGHT 2015 Sociedad Colombiana de Entomologia
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Fonseca, Alysson R.; Carvalho, Cesar F.; Cruz, Ivan; Souza, Brigida; Ecole, Carlos C.
Publication:Revista Colombiana de Entomologia
Date:Jan 1, 2015
Words:4096
Previous Article:Parametros poblacionales de Leptopharsa gibbicarina (Hemiptera: Tingidae) plaga de la palma de aceite.
Next Article:Danos causados por Conotrachelus psidii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) en frutos de feijoa (Acca sellowiana).
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters