Printer Friendly

Depression and anxiety in multisomatoform disorder: prevalence and clinical predictors in primary care.

Objective. Multisomatoform disorder (MSD) is characterised by [greater than or equal to] 3 medically inexplicable, troublesome physical symptoms, together with a [greater than or equal to] 2-year history of somatisation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in a South African sample MSD, and to compare demographic and clinical outcomes in those patients with and without co-morbidity. Methods. Fifty-one adult outpatients with MSD were recruited from primary care clinics in the Cape Town metropole. Participants were assessed for the presence of co-morbid depressive and anxiety disorders using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus). Outcomes included somatic symptom severity, disability, reported sick days and health care visits, pain experience, patient satisfaction with health services, and clinician-experienced difficulty.

Results. A current co-morbid depressive disorder was present in 29.4% (N=15) of patients, and a current co-morbid anxiety disorder in 52.9% (N=27). MSD patients with a co-morbid depressive disorder (current or lifetime) had significantly higher physical symptom counts, greater functional impairment, higher unemployment rates, more clinician-reported difficulties, and more dissatisfaction with health care services than those without the disorder. A larger number of co-morbid disorders was associated with greater overall disability.

Conclusion. High rates of co-morbid depressive and anxiety disorders were present in a South African sample of primary care patients with MSD. Not all patients had co-morbidity, which is consistent with the view that MSD should be viewed as an independent disorder. However, co-morbid depressive disorders were associated with increased symptom severity and functional impairment, consistent with previous reports from developing countries, emphasising the importance of comorbidity in MSD.


Somatisation in primary care patients is a common and disabling condition found in the populations of all countries and cultures studied. (1) Physical symptoms precipitate more than half of all primary care visits, and at least a third of such symptoms remain medically unexplained. (2, 3) Patients with somatisation are frequent users of medical care; and excessive clinic visits, diagnostic testing, referrals, prescriptions and procedures all contribute to increased health care costs. (4, 5) Somatisation results in considerable disability, impairment in various life domains, and health anxiety. (5) Furthermore, the somatising patient is often dissatisfied with health care services and is rated by clinicians as being among their most difficult and unsatisfying encounters. (5, 6)

Psychiatric co-morbidity is common in patients with somatisation. Multiple medically unexplained symptoms increase the likelihood of a co-existing psychiatric diagnosis, with as many as half of patients having an anxiety disorder, and two-thirds a depressive disorder.3,5,7-9 Moreover, there is some evidence that functional impairment is higher in somatoform disorder with a co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorder. (7)

Multisomatoform disorder (MSD) is a diagnosis from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Primary Care Version (DSM-IV PC), encompassing the moderately severe form of undifferentiated somatoform disorder, with a prevalence of 8-10% in primary care. (5, 10) MSD is characterised by 3 or more currently troublesome medically unexplained symptoms together with a 2-year history of somatisation. If part of the criteria for a current mental disorder, physical symptoms do not count toward the diagnosis of MSD (e.g. palpitations exclusively during a panic attack). Those with MSD have impaired functioning comparable to somatisation disorder, are at increased risk for co-morbid depressive and anxiety disorders, are more prone to be unsatisfied with their health care, and are more likely to be viewed as difficult patients. (3, 5)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in a South African sample with MSD, and to compare various demographic and clinical outcomes between those with and without co-morbidity, based on the hypothesis that MSD with co-morbid depressive and anxiety disorders would be associated with greater functional impairment than MSD without co-morbidity.



Fifty-one adult outpatients meeting diagnostic criteria for MSD were recruited from primary care clinics in the Cape Town area. Participants were recruited for a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment study, (11) and data on co-morbid disorders were collected in this group. Exclusion criteria included current or past bipolar mood disorder, psychotic disorder or substance abuse/dependence, serious unstable medical illness, pregnancy or breastfeeding, significant risk of suicide, concurrent cognitive behavioural therapy, or use of psychotropic medication.

The study was designed and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Stellenbosch University institutional review board approved the protocol. All participants provided written, informed, voluntary consent.


Participants were assessed for the presence of co-morbid depressive and anxiety disorders using a structured diagnostic interview based on DSM-IV criteria and the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus), Version 5. (12) Those with somatic symptoms only in the context of a psychiatric disorder other than MSD (e.g. dizziness occurring only during a panic attack) were excluded. Demographic data were collected, together with reported sick days and health care visits in the 3 months preceding the assessment.

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15) was used to measure severity of functional somatic symptoms. (2) The PHQ15 comprises 15 commonly encountered somatic symptoms, each scored from 0 ('not bothered at all') to 2 ('bothered a lot'). Additional measures included the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), (13) a Visual Analogue Pain Rating Scale (VAS-P), (14) the 10-item Difficult Doctor Patient Relationship Questionnaire (DDPRQ-10), (6) and a consumer satisfaction subscale from the Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Study (CAHPS). (15)

Statistical analyses

Contingency tables with the maximum likelihood chi-square test as test statistic were used to compare nominal response variables with other nominal variables. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare continuous response variables with nominal variables. Levene's test was used to check for homogeneity of variances, and the Shapiro-Wilk test to test the residuals for normality. The Mann-Whitney U-test or the Kruskal-Wallis test was used if the residuals from the ANOVA were not normally distributed or if the response variable was ordinal. A significance level of 5% was used in all statistical tests.


Demographic data and other outcomes in the entire sample, and those with a current depressive disorder, a current anxiety disorder, any depressive disorder (current or lifetime), any anxiety disorder (current or lifetime), and any co-morbid depressive/anxiety disorder (current or lifetime) are shown in Table I. The sample consisted of 5 males (9.8%) and 46 females (90.2%); mean age 39.6 years (standard deviation (SD) 9.9). The majority were Caucasian, married, employed, and had a secondary school education.

Dysthymic disorder (N=14 - 27.5%) was the most common current depressive disorder, followed by current major depressive disorder (MDD) (N=1 - 2%). Generalised anxiety disorder (N=24 - 47.1%) was the most common current anxiety disorder, followed by social anxiety disorder (N=10 - 19.6%), agoraphobia (N=3 - 5.9%) and panic disorder (N=2 - 3.9%). MDD (49%) was the most common lifetime depressive disorder, and 13 (25.5%) patients met diagnostic criteria for a lifetime panic disorder. Any current co-morbid depressive disorder was present in 29.4% (N=15) of patients, and a current co-morbid anxiety disorder in 52.9% (N=27). Any anxiety disorder (current or lifetime) was reported in 60.8% (N=31), and any depressive disorder (current or lifetime) in 60.8% (N=31) of MSD patients. A current or lifetime co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorder was present in 74.5% (N=38) of participants. It was notable that most patients with lifetime co-morbid disorder also had a current co-morbid disorder, suggesting chronicity of the comorbidity.

Physical symptom count and disability measures were compared in those with/without a co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorder. Significantly higher physical symptom counts were reported by MSD participants with a current or lifetime depressive disorder (p=0.003), and by those with any current or lifetime co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorder (p=0.004). MSD patients with a current co-morbid depressive disorder had a significantly higher degree of overall (p=0.0476), social life (p=0.022) and family life/home responsibility (p=0.01) impairment than those without such co-morbidity. Those with a current or lifetime depressive disorder reported significantly more overall impaired functioning (p=0.02) and impaired family life/home responsibilities (p<0.0005) than those without such a disorder. Those with any co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorder (current or lifetime) had significantly more family life/home responsibility impairment (p=0.003) than those without.

Mean PHQ-15 scores and disability measures of patients with any 1, 2, 3 and 4 or more co-morbid disorders were compared. A greater number of co-morbid disorders tended to be related to greater symptom severity, and 4 or more comorbid disorders were associated with significantly higher levels of overall disability (p=0.041) and impaired family life/ home responsibilities (p=0.0046).

Age, gender, race, marital status, level of education, and VAS-P pain rating scores did not differ significantly between patients with or without a co-morbid disorder. However, employment status differed significantly across the groups. Compared to the entire sample (60.8% employed v. 39.2% unemployed), patients with a current or lifetime depressive disorder (48.4% employed v. 51.6% unemployed; p=0.021) and those with any current or lifetime co-morbid anxiety/ depression (52.6% employed v. 47.4% unemployed; p=0.032) had higher unemployment rates.

MSD patients with any co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorder (current or lifetime) had significantly more health care visits in the 3 months preceding evaluation (p=0.049). Participants with a co-morbid depressive disorder (current or lifetime) were rated as more difficult and frustrating by clinicians (p=0.02); and these patients rated their overall health care in the past 6 months as poorer (p=0.031) than those who had MSD only.


The main findings of this study were: (i) a high prevalence of co-morbid depressive and anxiety disorders in South African subjects with MSD, consistent with previous reports in developed countries; (3, 9) (ii) significant associations of co-morbidity in MSD with somatic symptom count; and (iii) significant associations of co-morbidity in MSD with disability, clinician-experienced difficulties and lack of patient satisfaction.

Previous literature indicates that total somatic symptom count (irrespective of cause) is strongly predictive of the presence of a psychiatric disorder. (3, 5, 8) In our MSD sample, a high somatic symptom count was associated with the likelihood of a co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorder.

MSD patients with any co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorder were significantly more disabled, and were more likely to be unemployed and make greater use of health care services than those with MSD only. Moreover, having [greater than or equal to] 4 co-morbid disorders was significantly associated with greater functional impairment and poorer family life/home responsibilities. The presence of a co-morbid depressive disorder was associated with increased clinician frustration and patient dissatisfaction with the overall quality of health care services. These findings are consistent with previous literature: somatisation has a detrimental effect on various health outcomes, (5, 7) and the presence of a co-morbid depressive disorder may have a cumulative effect on impairment, medical utilisation, clinician-experienced difficulties and patient dissatisfaction.

High rates of co-morbidity may lead to suggestions that somatoform disorders be better conceptualised as a severity marker of depression or anxiety, rather than an independent disorder. However, some evidence is consistent with the concept of MSD as an independent disorder. In our sample, a quarter of the patients had no co-morbid depressive or anxiety disorder. Previous literature indicates that medically unexplained symptoms often arise without concurrent depression or anxiety, with at least a third of such patients having somatisation alone. (3, 5, 7, 8) Moreover, MDD has an episode co-morbidity of 63-66%. (16, 17) These rates are not so different from co-morbidity rates reported in studies on somatoform disorders as to argue that MDD is an independent entity, whereas somatoform disorders are not.

Limitations of this study include a small sample size, predominantly female participants, and selection bias (MSD participants were recruited for a treatment study that excluded those with bipolar mood disorder, psychotic disorder, and present or recent substance use disorders). However, results from our study might not have been greatly affected by the selection process, as previous literature reported a relatively low incidence of these disorders in somatisation: mania (4.2% prevalence), followed by substance abuse (4.9% prevalence), were reported as less common co-morbidities in a sample with somatisation disorder. (9, 18)

In conclusion, MSD with co-morbid depressive and anxiety disorders is common in primary care. Such co-morbidities are associated with an increased number of somatic symptoms, greater disability, increased provider frustration, and patients' unmet health care expectations. However, delineating the relationship between somatisation and depressive and anxiety disorders still holds many challenges. Future research may address the pathophysiology and clinical course of MSD in those with/without co-morbidity, and investigate the influence of certain genetic and environmental factors (e.g. childhood adversities) on its pathogenesis.

At the time that this study was conducted, Professor Stein and Dr Muller were funded by the Medical Research Council of South Africa. This study was funded by H Lundbeck A/S.

Accepted 25 February 2008.


(1.) Gureje O, Simon G, Ustun TB, Goldberg DP. Somatization in cross-cultural perspective: a World Health Organization study in primary care. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154: 989-995.

(2.) Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med 2002; 64(2): 258-266.

(3.) Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. Physical symptoms in primary care. Predictors of psychiatric disorders and functional impairment. Arch Fam Med 1994; 3(9): 774-779.

(4.) Barsky AJ, Orav EJ, Bates DW. Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical co-morbidity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62(8): 903910.

(5.) Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, deGruy FV, III, et al. Multisomatoform disorder. An alternative to undifferentiated somatoform disorder for the somatizing patient in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54(4): 352-358.

(6.) Hahn SR, Thompson KS, Wills TA, Stern V, Budner NS. The difficult doctor-patient relationship: somatization, personality and psychopathology. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47(6): 647-657.

(7.) de Waal MW, Arnold IA, Eekhof JA, van Hemert AM. Somatoform disorders in general practice: prevalence, functional impairment and co-morbidity with anxiety and depressive disorders. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184: 470-476.

(8.) Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. Gender differences in the reporting of physical and somatoform symptoms. Psychosom Med 1998; 60(2): 150-155.

(9.) Brown FW, Golding JM, Smith GR, Jr. Psychiatric co-morbidity in primary care somatization disorder. Psychosom Med 1990; 52(4): 445-451.

(10.) American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed., Primary Care Version: DSM-IV-PC. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1995.

(11.) Muller JE, Wentzel I, Koen L, Niehaus DJH, Seedat S, Stein DJ. Escitalopram in the treatment of multisomatoform disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2007; 23(1): 43-48.

(12.) Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 Suppl 20: 22-33.

(13.) Sheehan DV, Harnett-Sheehan K, Raj BA. The measurement of disability. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1996; 11 Suppl 3: 89-95.

(14.) Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am 1999; 79(2): 231-252.

(15.) Hartz AJ, Noyes R, Bentler SE, Damiano PC, Willard JC, Momany ET. Unexplained symptoms in primary care: perspectives of doctors and patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000; 22(3): 144-152.

(16.) Olfson M, Fireman B, Weissman MM, et al. Mental disorders and disability among patients in a primary care group practice. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154(12): 1734-1740.

(17.) Ormel J, VonKorff M, Ustun TB, Pini S, Korten A, Oldehinkel T. Common mental disorders and disability across cultures. Results from the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care. JAMA 1994; 272(22): 1741-1748.

(18.) Simon GE, VonKorff M. Somatization and psychiatric disorder in the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area study. Am J Psychiatry 1991; 148(11): 1494-1500.

Medical Research Council Unit on Anxiety Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, W


Jacqueline E Muller, MB ChB, MMed (Psych)

Ignatius Wentzel, MB ChB

Centre for Statistical Consultation, Department of Statistics, Stellenbosch University

Daniel G Nel, MSc, PhD

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town

Dan J Stein, MB ChB, FRCPC, PhD

Corresponding author: J E Muller (
Table I. Patient characteristics and outcomes
(means are reported for continuous responses
and percentages for nominal responses)

 Entire Current Current
 sample depression anxiety

No. of patients 51 (100%) 15 (30%) 27 (52.9%)
Female, N (%) 46 (90.2%) 13 (86.7%) 25 (92.6%)
Male, N (%) 5 (9.8%) 2 (13.3%) 2 (7.4%)
Mean age in
 years ([+ or -] SD) 40 (10) 40.5 (8) 40 (10)
Employed 31 (60.8%) 6 (40%) 14 (51.9%)

 Unemployed 20 (39.2%) 9 (60%) 13 (48.1%)

 Unemployed and
 receiving a disability
 grant 2 (3.9%) 2 (13.3%) 1 (3.7%)
Sick days off work 3.63 2.20 2.82
in past 3 months
Health care visits 4.66 4.07 4.07
in past 3 months
PHQ-15 total 15.98 17.33 17.07

SDS total 17.02 20.20 18.44
 * p=0.0476
SDS work 5.92 6.20 6.22
SDS social life 5.57 7.00 6.11
 * p=0.022
SDS family life/ 5.53 7.00 6.11
home responsibilities * p=0.01
VAS-P 6.24 6.53 6.59
DDPRQ-10 33.33 35.80 34.5

CAHPS overall quality 6.65 5.80 6.40
of health care past 6 months

 Current or Current or depression
 lifetime lifetime and/or
 depression anxiety anxiety

No. of patients 31 (60%) 31 (60%) 38 (74.5%)
Female, N (%) 28 (90.3%) 29 (93.5%) 35 (92.1%)
Male, N (%) 3 (9.7%) 2 (6.5%) 3 (7.9%)
Mean age in
 years ([+ or -] SD) 40 (9.5) 40 (10) 40.5 (9.5)
Employed 15 (48.4%) 16 (51.6%) 20 (52.6%)
 * p=0.021 * p=0.032
 Unemployed 16 (51.6%) 15 (48.4%) 18 (47.4%)
 * p=0.021 * p=0.032
 Unemployed and
 receiving a disability
 grant 2 (6.5%) 1 (3.2%) 2 (5.3%)
Sick days off work 4.92 2.62 4.06
in past 3 months
Health care visits 4.20 4.16 4.11
in past 3 months * p=0.049
PHQ-15 total 17.58 16.97 17.13
 * p=0.003 * p=0.004
SDS total 18.9 17.81 18.13
 * p=0.02
SDS work 6.29 5.94 6.05
SDS social life 6.06 5.90 5.92

SDS family life/ 6.55 5.97 6.16
home responsibilities * p<0.0005 * p=0.003
VAS-P 6.61 6.29 6.45
DDPRQ-10 35.43 34.66 33.99
 * p=0.02
CAHPS overall quality 5.90 6.67 6.55
of health care past 6 months * p=0.013

* p<0.05 in MSD patients with co-morbid disorders v. those without.
COPYRIGHT 2008 South African Medical Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Articles
Author:Muller, Jacqueline E.; Ignatius, Wentzel; Nel, Daniel G.; Stein, Dan J.
Publication:South African Medical Journal
Geographic Code:6SOUT
Date:Jun 1, 2008
Previous Article:The evolving impact of HIV/AIDS on outpatient health services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Next Article:Homicide trends in the Mthatha area between 1993 and 2005.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters