Dental caries and pericoronitis associated with impacted mandibular third molars - a clinical and radiographic study.
The most common impacted tooth is mandibular third molar and knowledge and assessment of its angulation pattern position and depth in mandibular bone helps in better treatment planning and management of patients. The objective of this study was to enlist the frequency of dental caries and pericoronitis associated with different patterns of impacted mandibular third molars in different age groups and genders.
A total of 250 patients with 393 impacted mandibular third molars seen in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Punjab Dental Hospital Lahore from October 2012 to March
2013 were included in the study. The age range of these patients was of 20 to 65 years. Patients were assessed by history clinical and radiographic examination. Patterns of mandibular third molar impactions were assessed by using classification systems developed by Winter and Pell and Gregory on periapical radiographs. Pericoronitis was assessed by patient's history and clinical evaluation of mucosa surrounding the impacted mandibular third molars. Dental caries was assessed by clinical and radiographic evaluation.
The most frequent pattern of impaction was mesioangular (37.6%) with Class II ramus rela- tionship (53.2%) and Position A depth (62.8%). Dental caries was seen in 38.53% of patients mostly associated with mesioangular Position A Class I molars. Pericoronitis was seen in 29.36% of patients mostly associated with distoangular Position A or B Class II molars.
It was concluded that the patients having third molars with the unfavourable angulations patterns and positions could be considered as the candidates for prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars to prevent dental caries or pericoronitis. Moreover early diagnosis of percoronitis and dental caries and proper management of third molar is necessary to prevent further consequences.
Key Words: Impacted third molar Pericoronitis Dental caries Distoangular impaction.
Impacted teeth are those which fail to erupt in dental arch within expected time.12 Any tooth in dental arch may become impacted but the most common are mandibular third molars. The tooth may become impacted because of adjacent teeth dense overlying bone or excessive soft tissue.4 Different local causes of impacted teeth include lack of space in the jaw an aberrant path of eruption premature loss of primary teeth abnormal positioning of tooth bud inflammatory or pathological lesions etc.
Mandibular third molars erupt at 17 to 21 years age. Frequency of impaction is three fold in mandible than maxilla with significantly higher frequency in females than males.678 Mandibular third molars may acquire a range of patterns and positions and can lead to diverse pathologies. Clinical and radiographic examinations not only facilitate to classify these teeth but also help to diagnose and differentiate different pathologies associated with them. Pericoronitis is the most common problem associated with impacted third molar followed by dental caries of third molar itself or adjacent second molar (Fig 1a-c).9-11
Although it is possible to observe the profile of soft tissue in relation to third molars there are currently no standardized clinical criteria for assessment of soft tissue associated with impacted teeth. These parame- ters not only pose difficulties in accurate recording of the clinical condition of soft tissue but also open new horizons for future studies.21
Pericoronitis is an acute inflammatory condition associated mostly with partially erupted mandibular third molars. Clinical features include pain swelling limited jaw opening difficulty in swallowing fever malaise and lymphadenopathy. On the basis of the severity of these features pericoronitis is classified into acute sub-acute and chronic types.1217 If appropriate treatment is not initiated pericoronitis may progress to cellulites osteomyelitis or facial space infections. Position of third molars in jaw and their occlusal anato- my with deep occlusal fissures favours the accumulation of biofilm on tooth and leads to dental caries. Impacted mandibular third molars that contact cemento-enamel junction of second molar place this tooth at risk of dis- tal cervical caries.10 In these situations prophylactic removal of impacted tooth can benefit dental health of patient.131415
The universal recommendation is to consider each case individually to balance the benefits and risks of retention versus extraction of third molar. Furthermore where non-extraction strategy is adopted long-term clinical and radiographic follow up should be main- tained so that surgical intervention can be instituted if some pathology starts to develop.16 Classically called
wisdom teeth' implying the age at which they erupt when humans are thought to attain wisdom. Their eruption has traditionally been linked with a host of inflammatory problems due to different types of mi- crobial flora e.g. spirochaetes prevotella veillonella bacteroides and capnocytophaga in the gingival crevice of partially impacted third molars.17
There are a lot of studies about impacted third mo- lars both in national and international literature but a few articles about their association with pericoronitis and dental caries. The present study will elucidate on dental caries and pericoronitis associated with different
patterns of mandibular third molar impaction. This in turn will help to prioritize treatment in patients with such patterns and rationalize decision making in relation to pericoronitis and dental caries of impacted mandibular third molars.
This case series was conducted at Oral and Maxillo- facial Surgery Department deMontmorency College of Dentistry / Punjab Dental Hospital Lahore from October 2012 to March 2013.
A total of 250 patients were selected for this study. Inclusion criteria for the study group were patients with chief complaints related to impacted mandibular third molars and/or associated pericoronitis or dental caries and complete root formation of mandibular third molar. Exclusion criteria were the patients younger than 20 years patients suffering from some other maxillofacial problem or with some systemic disease e.g. diabetes mellitus any systemic or craniofacial anomaly or syn- drome (e.g. Down syndrome cleiodo-cranial dysostosis) and absence of mandibular second molar. Assessment of different patterns of impacted mandibular third mo- lar teeth and their associated pericoronitis and dental caries was done by detailed relevant history clinical examination and radiographs.
A history of pain or swelling in third molar re- gion difficulty in chewing and mastication foul smell or limitation of mouth opening was recorded. Extra orally patients were examined for skin colour and texture or any swelling. Mouth opening was observed by measuring median inter-incisal opening. Intra orally oral hygiene was assessed with status of denti- tion especially any carious lesion in mandibular third molar or adjacent second molar. The mucosa around mandibular third molar was assessed for any change in colour texture food impaction swelling bleeding or pus discharge. The peri-apical x-rays were used to assess any carious lesion in second or third molar angulation of mandibular third molar impaction its depth and ramus relationship.
Angulation of impacted mandibular third molars was assessed by Winter's classification and teeth were labeled as mesioangular distoangular vertical or horizontal and other impactions (buccal lingual or transverse). Pattern and position of impacted third molar was documented according to Pell and Gregory classification. If space between anterior border of ramus and distal surface of second molar was sufficient it
was labeled Class I. If space was less than mesiodistal diameter of impacted tooth it was termed Class II. A tooth completely into ramus was assigned Class III. A third molar with its highest part at level of occlusal plane of second molar was assigned position A. In posi- tion B impacted tooth was between occlusal plane and cervical margin of second molar while a tooth below cervical margin was labeled position C.
For each patient a number of variables were re- corded including demographic details (age and sex) side (right or left) angulation (mesioangular distoan- gular vertical horizontal) pattern of impaction (class I II III or position A B C) and associated pathologies (pericoronitis dental caries of second or third molar).
The data were recorded in a specially designed proforma and entered in SPSS version 16 and analyzed through its statistical package by using Chi Square test. The data were presented as proportion and percentage. The variables were also presented in tables and graphs.
A total of 250 patients having 393 impacted man- dibular third molars were selected for the study. The age range was of 20 to 65 years. The highest number of patients having impacted third molars was of 20-25 years followed by 26-30 years. There was a uniform decline in number of patients with increasing age.
The removal of impacted third molars is a frequently performed dento-alveolar procedure worldwide.18 The present study was conducted on patients over 20 years because by this age one can differentiate more reliably if third molar has insufficient space or is improperly positioned or its root formation has completed.26 Though the literature holds a significantly higher frequency of impacted third molars in females the findings of current study showed a slight male preponderance (54%). These observations are not in favour of Hellman's theory which states that jaws of females stop growing when third molars just begin to erupt whereas in males growth of jaws continues beyond the time of eruption of third
molars resulting in decreased incidence of third molar impactions in males compared to females.19 A uniform decline in the number of patients with increase in age was also noted with a mean age of 31.08 years (SD = +/-
8.98 years). People in their third decade of life were seen with highest percentage of impacted third molars.924
Mesioangular impactions were the highest number of impacted mandibular third molars followed by vertical distoangular and horizontal angulation. There might have been an increased degree of disparity in these findings relating to operator sensitive differences in labeling overlapping' angulations e.g. teeth having 70 to 90 inclination to occlusal level. In the current study this problem was overcomed by using a standardized scientifically geometric method to classify and label such impacted teeth. About 53% patients had a ramus relationship of class II followed by class I and class III. About 62.8% patients had impacted third molar placed at position A depth followed by position B and C. These findings closely match the national and international studies.20-26
A total of 250 patients with 393 impacted man- dibular third molars presented for extraction of these teeth. The most frequent reason for extraction of third molar was dental caries in adjacent second molar or third molar itself (38.53%) followed by pericoronitis in 29.36% of patients. These findings are different than those seen in other studies from Pakistan where pericoronitis was 48.5% in Peshawar28and 53% in Lahore.29
Obiechina and others showed that 42.9% of impact- ed teeth were associated with pericoronitis and 13.9% with caries. Pericoronitis has widely been reported as the main reason for extraction of lower third molars. Jamileh and Pedlar also found that pericoronitis was the most common indication for removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Researchers have proposed that as pericoronitis forms one of the most frequent acute conditions affecting the oral cavity its presence with uncomfortable symptoms forms an important and urgent reason to seek care in the form of extraction of impacted third molar. The acute nature of the problem often draws patient's attention to hospital consultation
TABLE.1: DISTRIBUTION OF DENTAL CARIES AND PERICORONITIS; ANGULATION WISE
more than other symptoms associated with impacted third molar.27 In the current study pericoronitis was seen to be the second common and not the most common reason for extraction of third molars. This might be due to the appointment schedule protocol of this department. Moreover minor oral surgery clinic of deMontmorency College of Dentistry/Punjab Dental Hospital Lahore is the biggest treatment centre of surgical dento-alveolar problems in the province of Punjab a very high number of patients with impacted third molars are referred from different primary care centers or private clinics. As pericoronitis necessitates early consultation by a doctor making it an urgent need to see a doctor and is therefore seen more at private clinics. The acute problem may resolve up till the patient visited the tertiary care centre for extraction of impacted molar. Pericoronitis was more often seen in patients with positions A and B because these depths are generally associated more with soft tissue impaction forming a cuff over partially erupted teeth and start pericoronitis. No infected patients showed complete impaction or position C. Similarly pericoronitis manifested most commonly in class II impacted molars which is prob- ably because they are half visible in the mouth with an operculum and do not have a good inter-cuspation with maxillary counterparts. Erupted maxillary third molars may further aggravate infective process in the operculum by constantly traumatizing soft tissue. Partial or submucosal impaction is a significant risk factor for acute pericoronitis in impacted mandibular third molars.3031
The impaction of mandibular third molars was most commonly seen in patients in their third decade of life. The most common pattern of mandibular third molar impactions was mesioangular with a position A depth and Class II ramus relationship. Dental caries was mostly associated with mesioangular Position A Class I molars. Pericoronitis was associated more commonly with distoangular position A or B Class II molars in patients from 20-35 years of age. Therefore the patients having third molars with these unfa- vourable angulations patterns and positions could be considered the candidates for prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Moreover early diagnosis of percoronitis and dental caries and proper management of third molar is necessary to prevent further consequences. Although this study may not represent the Pakistani population as a whole the results are useful for primary health workers because
the patients studied represent the range of dental patients presenting to a dental hospital.
1 Nazir A Asif S Akram MA. Surgical removal of trans-alveolar mandibular 2nd premolar impactions by lingual approach. Pakistan Oral and Dent J 2013; 33: 35-37.
2 Hupp JR Ellis III E Tucker MR. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Principles of management of impacted teeth. 6th Ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Publishers; 2014: 143-67.
3 Ishihara Y Kamioka H Yamamoto TT Yamashiro T. Patient with non-syndromic bilateral and multiple impacted teeth and dentigerous cysts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141:
4 Sheikh MA Riaz M Shafiq S. Incidence of distal caries in mandibular second molars due to impacted third molars A clinical and radiographic study. Pakistan Oral and Dent J 2012;
5 Fu PS Wang JC Wu YM Huang TK Chen WC Tseng YC et al. Impacted mandibular second molar- a retrospective study of prevalence and treatment outcome. Angle Orthod 2012; 82:
6 Secic S Prohic S Komsic S Vukovic A. Incidence of impacted mandibular third molars in population of Bosnia and Herze- govina: a retrospective radiographic study. J Health Sci 2013;
7 Alhaija ESJA Bhairan HMA Khateeb SNA. Mandibular third molar space in different antero-posterior skeletal patterns. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 570-76.
8 Juodzbalys G Daugela P. Mandibular third molar impaction: Review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2013; 4: 1-12.
9 Syed KB Kota Z Ibrahim M Bagi MA Assiri MA. Prevalence of impacted molar teeth among Saudi population in Asir region Saudi Arabia A retrospective study of 3 years. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5: 43-47.
10 Msagati F Simon ENM Owibingire S. Pattern of occurrence and treatment of impacted teeth at the Muhimbili National Hospital Dar es Salaam Tanzania. BMC Oral Health 2013;
11 Razavi SM Hasheminia D Mehdizade M Movahedian B Kes- hani F. The relation of pericoronal third molar follicle dimension and bcl-2/ki-67 expression: An immunohistochemical study. Dent Res J 2012; 9: 26-31.
12 Chu FCS Li TKL Lui VKB Newsome PRH Chow RLK Cheung LK. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies " a radiographic study of Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J 2003; 9: 158-63.
13 Jung YH Cho BH. Prevalence of missing and impacted third molars in adults aged 25 years and above. Imaging Sci Dent
2013; 43: 219-25.
14 Allen RT Witherow H Collyer J Roper-Hall R Nazir MA Mathew G. The mesioangular third molar - to extract or not to extract Analysis of 776 consecutive third molars. Br Dent J 2009; 206: 586-87.
15 Falci SG de Castro CR Santos RC de Souza Lima LD Ra- mos-Jorge ML Botelho AM et al. Association between the
presence of a partially erupted mandibular third molar and the existence of caries in the distal of the second molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 1270-74.
16 Friedman JW. The prophylactic extraction of third molars: A
public health hazard. Am J Public Health 2007; 97: 1554-59.
17 Folayan MO Ozeigbe EO Onyejaeka1 N Chukwumah NM Oyedele T. Non-third molar related pericoronitis in a sub-urban Nigeria population of children. Nigerian J Clin Pract 2014; 17:
18 Jaffar R Tin M. Impacted mandibular third molars among patients attending Hospital University Sains Malaysia. Arch Orofac Sci 2009; 4: 7-12.
19 Reddy KVG. Distribution of third molar impactions among rural and urban dwellers in age group of 22-30 years in South India: A comparative study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2012; 11: 271-75.
20 Azaz B Shteyer A Piamenta M. Radiographic and clinical manifestations of the impacted mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Surg 1976; 5: 153-60.
21 Ayaz H Rehman A. Pattern of impacted mandibular third mo- lar in patients reporting Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Khyber College of Dentistry Peshawar. J Khyb Coll Dent 2012; 2: 50-53.
22 Padhye MN Dabir AV Girotra CS Pandhi VH. Pattern of mandibular third molar impactions in the Indian population: a retrospective clinic-radiographic survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: 161-66.
23 Fernandes MJ Ogden GR Pitts NB Ogston SA Ruta DA: Incidence of symptoms in previously symptom-free impacted lower third molars assessed in general dental practice. Br Dent J 2009; 12: 207-12.
24 Hashemipour MA Arashlow MT Hnzaei FF: Incidence of im- pacted mandibular and maxillary third molars: A radiographic study in a Southern Iran population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18: 40-45.
25 Byahatti S Ingafou MSH. Prevalence of eruption status of third molars in Libyan students. Dent Res J 2012; 9: 152-57.
26 Hassan AH. Pattern of third molar impactions in a Saudi population. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2010; 2: 109-13.
27 Krishnan B El Sheikh MH El-Gehani R Orafi H. Indications for removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a single institutional experience in Libya. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2009; 8: 246-48.
28 Ishfaq M Wahid A Rahim A Munim A. Patterns and pre- sentations of impacted mandibular third molars subjected to removal at Khyber College of Dentistry Peshawar. Pakistan Oral and Dent J 2006; 26: 221-26.
29 Shah I Saeed M Shah AA Sohail A. An audit of the pathologies associated with impacted wisdom teeth. Pakistan Oral and Dent J 2006; 26: 271-74.
30 Yamaoka M Ono Y Takahashi M Doto R Yasuda K Uematsu T et al. Bone resorption in incompletely impacted mandibular third molars and acute pericoronitis. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2009; 1: 7-12.
31 Prockt AP Schebela CR Maito FDM Filho MSA Rados PV. Odontogenic Cysts: Analysis of 680 Cases in Brazil. Head and Neck Pathol 2008; 2: 150-56.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Shahid Ali; Asif Nazir; Syed Adnan Ali Shah; Muhammad Usman Akhtar|
|Publication:||Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal|
|Date:||Jun 30, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Efficacy of chlorhexidine versus betadine as an irrigating agent during removal of bilateral impacted lower third molars.|
|Next Article:||Oral malignant melanoma : a case report.|