Dell PowerEdge servers get AMD's new 16-core chips.
The company has upgraded the four-socket PowerEdge M915 blade server, which will be able to include up to 64 Opteron 6200 chip cores, the company said. The new servers will be faster than the M915 with the older 12-core Opteron 6100 chips, it was reported.
AMD last week announced the availability of its first Opteron 6200 server processors, which carry the most cores available on x86 chips today. The chips, code-named Interlagos, are 25% to 30% faster than their 12-core predecessors. The new chips are based on the new Bulldozer processor architecture, which is also more power efficient, AMD said.
"The PowerEdge M915 with Opteron 6200 processors offers a 30% gain in memory bandwidth, and a 25% gain in server-side Java performance compared to the same servers with the 12-core Opteron 6100 processors," said Jim Hahn, a Dell spokesman.
Dell introduced the M915 last year as a virtualisation and high-performance computing server. With 64 cores, the new chips will help expand the number of virtual machines available, and also provide more horsepower to speed up high-end applications such as databases, AMD said.
The server comes with multiple 10-gigabit Ethernet ports to speed up the server performance in virtualised environments and can be expanded to 12 networking ports, representatives said.
The server supports Microsoft Windows Server 2008, Windows HPC Server 2008, Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Server and Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Depending on the operating system, virtualisation support is provided for Citrix XenServer, VMware's vSphere and Microsoft's Hyper-V.
The M915 is available worldwide with pricing starting at US$7,195.
Dell is also equipping the PowerEdge R715 and R815 rack servers and the dense PowerEdge C6145 server with AMD's new chips, it announced.
Corporate Publishing International. All rights reserved.
Provided by Syndigate.info an Albawaba.com company
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Computer News Middle East|
|Date:||Nov 23, 2011|
|Previous Article:||A continuing story.|
|Next Article:||SAP not doing enough to keep users happy: User Group.|