Printer Friendly

Deferred compensation in Pennsylvania: clarification and update.

A news story on page 90 of the March-April 2004 issue of The Tax Executive proved to be premature. As explained in TEI's Comments Foster Taxpayer Victories in Pennsylvania, there were positive indications that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania had decided to concede two cases involving the issue of when deferred compensation becomes subject to the Commonwealth's personal income tax. The two consolidated cases, Ignatz v. Pennsylvania and Peabody v. Pennsylvania, challenged the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue's position that deferred compensation is subject to Pennsylvania income tax at the time of deferral, asserting that it is not subject to tax until the time of distribution (the issue arises either through an audit of the employee's Pennsylvania return or through an audit of an employer's withholding tax return). There are also many pending cases dealing with the same issue awaiting a final resolution of these two cases.

Despite the expectation by taxpayer representatives that Pennsylvania would concede the tax liability, the Commonwealth did not, and a hearing in the two cases was held as scheduled. More significantly, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania decided the issue against the taxpayers in an opinion issued May 12, 2004. The taxpayers have filed exceptions to the court's decision, and the cases are ongoing. TEI regrets any confusion the earlier story may have caused.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Tax Executives Institute, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Recent Activities
Publication:Tax Executive
Date:May 1, 2004
Words:217
Previous Article:TEI Board Approves Award for committee award for committee service.
Next Article:TEI to honor past president Betty Wilson, former Assistant Treasury Secretary Pam Olson.


Related Articles
A quantum leap for Alcoa's 401(k).
Deferred compensation and FICA rules under proposed regs.
Pittsburgh Chapter gets big turnout for fall meetings.
Definition of eligible retirement benefit plan and application of Pennsylvania personal income tax: December 19, 2003.
Taxpayer victory imminent in Pennsylvania.
IRS and Treasury issue myriad guidance.
PSC retirement agreements may be subject to sec. 409A prop. regs.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters