Printer Friendly

Defending separation is worth the risk, says Rep. Chet Edwards. (People & Events).

Defending church-state separation can be risky for a politician, but it's a risk worth taking, U.S. Rep. Chet Edwards (D-Texas) said recently.

Edwards, an 11-term congressman who represents Waco and surrounding areas, was awarded the Associated Baptist Press Religious Freedom Award at a ceremony in northern Virginia April 10. During his remarks, Edward reflected on a life spent in defense of religious liberty.

"The challenge we face is the same one faced in the days of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison," Edwards said. "Elected officials fear being perceived as anti-religious."

According to a report by the Associated Baptist Press, Edwards noted that during his last campaign, his Republican opponent attacked him for failing to support prayer in public schools.

"I believe in school prayer," Edwards told the crowd, "I just don't believe in government-sanctioned, government-ordered school prayer." He noted that it can be difficult to explain these issues in "a day of eight-second sound bites and 30-second commercials."

Edwards, who is a Methodist, has consistently defended church-state separation on the floor of the House. He has opposed mandatory school prayer amendments, fought against a provision to allow houses of worship to engage in partisan politicking and argued against President George W. Bush's "faith-based initiative," among other efforts.

Edwards' stands have not always made him popular. A few years ago, he fought against a measure that would mandate the display of the Ten Commandments in government buildings, seeing a certain amount of political grandstanding in the effort.

"I think congressmen should live by the Ten Commandments more and preach about them less from the floor of the Capitol," he said.

In an earlier interview with Associated Baptist Press, Edwards explained what motivates him to defend church-state separation.

"One only has to look at reports from the Middle East, Afghanistan, Sudan, Pakistan, India, etc., to realize that whenever you mix the power of government with the power of religion, it's not a good thing for government or religion," he said. "I consider my efforts in behalf of church-state separation to be the single most important cause I will ever have in public service. Religious freedom is the first freedom, and if it is put at risk, all the others--freedom of speech, association, etc.--are endangered."
COPYRIGHT 2003 Americans United for Separation of Church and State
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Church & State
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2003
Words:374
Previous Article:Secretive religious group offers Congressmen cheap rent in D.C. (People & Events).
Next Article:Religious Right silent on Bill Bennett's gambling addiction. (People & Events).
Topics:


Related Articles
Istook amendment revised to mollify religious groups, introduced in House.
Getting the job done: news from the trenches and the home front.
ISTOOK AMENDMENT DEFEATED!
Istook Amendment Reintroduced In House.
Hurricane Ernest And The Constitution.
FATHERS COUNT CONSTITUTION DOESN'T.
Faith-based victory! Senate approves scaled-back CARE Act without controversial church-state provisions--but other fights remain.
Historic battle: Bush administration approves public funds for repair of historic churches, as faith-based initiative attempts 'revolutionary march'...
Senate hearing gives 'commandments' judge national platform.
House blocks legal fees in church-state cases.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters