Printer Friendly

Deep-water shrimp fisheries in Latin America: a review/Pesquerias de camarones de aguas profundas en America Latina: una revision.

INTRODUCTION

Many marine fisheries, especially those in coastal waters, are fully exploited, threatened by overexploitation or already collapsed. According to Pauly (2009), demersal resources of all large shelves of the world have been depleted by the end of the 20th century. Declining catches in coastal zones and the concomitant increase in demand for seafood have forced the fishing industry to expand their activities into offshore and deep-water areas (Morato et al., 2006). As a consequence, the mean depth of bottom marine fish catches has increased from around 103 m in the early 1950s to 145 m in 2001, which represents a 42 m increase (Morato et al., 2006). Associated with this bathymetric shift in bottom fishery activities is an increase in the mean longevity of the catch, most dramatically since the early 1990s (Morato et al., 2006).

This trend is a serious concern, because deep-water species exhibit a series of life history traits, which make them especially vulnerable to overexploitation and extinction with a low capacity to recover from over-exploitation (e.g. Jennings et al., 1998; Cheung et al., 2005, Morato et al., 2006). Moreover, the apparent lack of solid information about the ecology of most deep-water species represents a major limitation for the development and implementation of management strategies for--water resources (Polidoro et al., 2008). Bensch et al. (2008) and Ramirez-Llodra et al. (2011) provided an overview of the current status of high seas bottom fisheries around the world, focusing principally on deep-water fisheries. The authors concluded that even basic information concerning total catch, by-catch species and life history of the deep-water target species is deficient and therefore not enough to generate conservation and management strategies. According to these authors, it is critical to assess these aspects if fisheries management intends to effectively ensure the long-term sustainability of these resources.

Deep-water shrimp fisheries have been developed in different parts of the world. In the northwest Atlantic, Canadian vessels began the exploitation of the northern shrimp Pandalus borealis between the late 1970s to early 1980s. Recently, many other countries reported catches of this species from high seas (Bensch et al., 2008). Different Heterocarpus species have been considered as large, relatively unexploited resources that may prove valuable to Pacific island nations and states; H. laevigatus and H. ensifer were identified as having the greatest commercial potencial. Ostazeski (1997) provided an overview of the deep-water shrimp fishery targeting H. laevigatus in northern Mariana Islands. He concluded that this fishery has yet to be fully exploited, but high costs involved in fishing in these deep-water areas may be more limiting than the sustainable yield. Well-established deep-water shrimp fisheries (Aristaeomorpha foliacea and, in particular, Aristeus antennatus; for review of the biology see Sarda et al., 2003; Politou et al., 2005) have been developed in the Mediterranean. Commercial fishing for these red shrimps started in the Ligurian Sea in the 1930s (Sarda et al., 2004). Stocks of the two aristeid shrimps collapsed in the 1970s, and fishing resumed following signs of stock recovery in 1985 (Sarda et al., 2004). A revision of the current status of the aristeid fishery in the Mediterranean is provided by Bensch et al. (2008).

Latin American fisheries are tending towards deeper water as well (Arana et al., 2009a). Several publications provide clear evidence for the increasing scientific and commercial interest in deep-water resources (e.g. Arana et al., 2002; Wehrtmann & Echeverria-Saenz, 2007; Wehrtmann & NielsenMunoz, 2009). More recently, Arana et al. (2009b) edited a compilation of information about deep-water fisheries and resources from both the Pacific and Atlantic coasts of Latin America. While commercial deep-water fisheries generally target bony and cartilaginous fishes (FAO, 2007), the situation in Latin America seems to be different: in this geographical zone, deep-water fishing activities focus largely on benthic and demersal invertebrates, and despite their relatively recent fishing history, 45% of these resources are already considered to be exploited or overexploited (Arana et al., 2009a).

Considering the above-mentioned situation, we felt the need to prepare an overview of the current status of the deep-water shrimp fisheries in Latin America. The present review compiles available information about these deep-water resources principally in Mexico, Central America, Peru, Chile and Brazil. In some of these countries/regions, no commercial fisheries have been established yet; in such cases, we gathered the available data obtained from scientific surveys carried out to assess the potential of the resources. The review provides a brief introduction to the deep-water shrimp species of commercial interest in Latin America, and presents, whenever available, information about the fishing fleet, fishery statistics, and management strategies. We finish our review with some recommendations for the future development of these fisheries and the associated research programs.

I. MEXICO

Introduction. National fisheries production in Mexico has reached a plateau around an annual record of 1.5 million metric ton (CONAPESCA, 2008). There seems to be little possibilities of substantially increasing this production while considering only traditional fishery resources, which are mainly caught in shallow waters (<100 m depth) of the continental shelf. Thus, the exploration of potential deep-water fishery grounds and other new fishery resources appears to be an alternative to raise this production in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Mexico, which covers more than 3 million [km.sup.2] (Gracia, 2001). Nonetheless, only scattered information on the potential fishery resources of this enormous area is available.

Shallow water penaeid shrimps, which can be found both in coastal lagoons and in the continental shelf, constitute the most important fishing resource in Mexico. More than 15 species are reported to occur in the Gulf of Mexico (Vazquez-Bader & Gracia, 1994; Gracia & Hernandez-Aguilera, 2005), but only six of them are commercially exploited (Farfantepenaeus aztecus, F. duorarum, F. brasiliensis, Litopenaeus setiferus, Sicyonia brevirostris and Xiphopenaeus kroyeri). Shallow water penaeid shrimps have been subjected to both artisanal inshore and industrial offshore fisheries and, as in many other parts of the world, these resources are overfished. High exploitation rates caused both growth and recruitmentoverfishing of some of the main shrimp species (F. duorarum, F. brasiliensis, L. setiferus) of the Gulf of Mexico (Gracia, 1996; Gracia & Vazquez-Bader, 1999). As a consequence of overfishing, the overall shrimp production of the Gulf of Mexico declined drastically after reaching its maximum yield during the 1970s-1980s (Gracia, 2004). Operations of the industrial offshore trawl fishery are limited to a depth of less than 100 m due to the bathymetric distribution of penaeid shrimps. Considering the intense trawling activities in the shelf bottoms of the Gulf of Mexico, it is unlikely to find unexploited shrimp fishing grounds of the traditionally exploited species. Therefore, the only possibility to increase shrimp catches is to find potential fishing grounds in deep-water areas in the Gulf of Mexico and in the EEZ of Pacific Mexico.

As a response to this situation, several initiatives were developed to obtain a better overview of the deep-water resources in Mexican waters. Regarding the Mexican Pacific, Hendrickx (2003, 2004) reported on the presence of four deep-water shrimp species (Benthesicymus tanneri Faxon, 1893; Acanthephyra brevicarinata Hanamura, 1984; Heterocarpus affinis Faxon, 1893; Pandalopsis ampla Bate, 1886) in the southeastern Gulf of California at depths between 600 and 2250 m. Hendrickx (2004) concluded that H. affinis could be considered as a target species. Starting in 2004, the project SAGARPA-CONACYT 040 aimed to carry out an exploratory fishery of deepwater shrimps in western Baja California (Flores et al., 2004). The results (Flores et al., 2004) showed the presence of Pandalus platyceros Brandt, 1851 between 126 and 252 m depth, and the species was considered as an important fishery resource yet not exploited in Mexico; the authors provided also a brief summary on the biology and fishery of this species.

Referring to the Atlantic coast of Mexico, Wicksten & Packard (2005) compiled records of 130 decapod species occurring on the continental slope (200-2500 m) and the abyssal plain (2500-3840 m) of the Gulf of Mexico. On the other hand, the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico is conducting a scientific research program, which began in 1999 and was then resumed in 2007 (Proyecto PAPIIT IN223109-3, Biodiversidad y Recursos Pesqueros Potenciales del Mar Profundo del Golfo de Mexico). This project aims to study and assess potential fishing resources, mainly deep-water shrimps (between 300-1200 m depth) of the Gulf of Mexico. The ongoing research program has been conducted on board of the R/V JUSTO SIERRA. Five research cruises (1999, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010) have been carried out as part of the ongoing project. Sampling stations were distributed along the entire Mexican Gulf of Mexico, from the Mexican border with the United States of America to the Mexican Caribbean Sea.

I.2. Presentation of the species. Six main deep-water shrimp species of the families Aristeidae, Solenoceridae and Penaeidae were found in the 300-1200 m depth range (Gracia et al., 2010). Other crustaceans (geryonid crabs, deep-water lobsters and other shrimp species) and fishes of potential commercial interest were found, too. The following deep-water shrimps, however, stood out due to their abundance and size.

Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) (giant red shrimp; local names: "camaron rojo gigante", "gamba espanola", and "camarao moruno" in Brazil) (Fig. 1). This aristeid shrimp is widely distributed and has been reported in the eastern Atlantic from the Bay of Biscay to western Sahara, Azores, Madeira, Canary Islands, the Mediterranean Sea, and off the coast of South Africa. In the western Atlantic, the species is known to occur from Massachusetts to Florida, in the Gulf of Mexico, and in the Caribbean Sea to Brazil. It has been also collected in the Indo-West Pacific from East Africa to Japan, New Zealand and Fiji (Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997; Tavares, 2002). The results of the scientific surveys (Gracia et al., 2010) revealed the presence of A. foliacea in the entire Gulf of Mexico. This species sustains commercial fisheries in the Mediterranean (Figueiredo et al., 2001; Ragonese et al., 2001) and is currently exploited in Brazil (see below). The giant red shrimp has a bathymetric distribution from 250 to 1300 m depth, and is found to be associated with mud bottoms (Tavares, 2002).

Aristaeopsis edwardsiana (Johnson, 1867) (scarlet shrimp; local name: "carabinero") (Fig. 2). The shrimp is found in the eastern Atlantic from Azores, Madeira, Canary Islands, Portugal and Morocco, western Sahara to South Africa, excluding the Medite-rranean Sea (Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997; Tavares, 2002). In the western Atlantic, the species can be found from south Grand Bank to Brazil including the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea (Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997). It was also reported from the IndoWest Pacific, but species identity was not confirmed (Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997). Latin American commercial fisheries targeting this aristeid shrimp have been developed in French Guiana and Brazil (Gueguen, 1998; Pezutto et al., 2006). The species, usually inhabiting mud bottoms, is most frequently found between 400-900 m, although it has a large bathymetric distribution range reported from 274 to 1850 m depth (Tavares, 2002).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Pleoticus robustus (Smith, 1885) (royal red shrimp; local name: "camaron rojo real") (Fig. 3). The distribution of this solenocerid shrimp is limited to the western Atlantic: from south of Martha's Vineyard (Massachusetts, USA), throughout the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea to French Guiana (Holthuis, 1980; Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997; Tavares, 2002). The royal red shrimp is the basis of a small but well-established fishery in the USA waters of the Gulf of Mexico off Alabama and Florida and Florida's Atlantic coast. The fishery is most active in the north of the Gulf of Mexico averaging 123380 kg per year since 1998 (Stiles et al., 2007). The species inhabits the upper continental slope between 180-730 m over blue/black mud, sand, muddy sand or white calcareous mud bottoms (Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997; Tavares, 2002). During the scientific surveys in the Mexican Gulf of Mexico the species was collected between 213 and 764 m depth.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Aristeus antillensis A. Milne Edwards & Bouvier, 1909 (purple shrimp; local names: "alistado" or "camaron purpura") (Fig. 4). The presence of this aristeid shrimp is restricted to the western Atlantic with a geographical distribution extending from Florida to Brazil, including the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea (Holthuis, 1980; Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997; Tavares, 2002). In Latin America, the species was seasonally exploited in French Guiana (Gueguen, 1998, 2001), and this species was also fished in Brazil, which is addressed later in this paper. Its bathymetric distribution ranges from 200 to 1144 m, although its density peaks are at 750 m depth (Pezzuto et al., 2006). In the Mexican Gulf of Mexico, the shrimp was found on mud bottoms above 300 m depth.

Penaeopsis serrata Bate, 1881 (pink speckled shrimp; local name: "camaron rosado moteado"). The penaeoid shrimp has an amphi-Atlantic distribution and can be found on mud bottoms between 120 to 640 m (Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997). This species has a potential commercial importance, but its comparatively small size may render its exploitation unappealing.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

Parapenaeus americanus Rathbun, 1901 (rose shrimp; local name: "camaron rosa"). This species of the family Penaeidae is distributed in the western Atlantic, and has been reported from the Gulf of Mexico to Uruguay (Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997). It can be found between 190-412 m, associated to mud bottoms (Perez-Farfante & Kensley, 1997). This species is less important in terms of number and weight compared to the other deep-water shrimp species found in Mexican waters of the Gulf of Mexico.

Many of these species have a wide worldwide distribution, but all of them are found along Latin America and some of them are already commercially exploited. Currently, deep-water shrimps are not subject to a commercial fishery in Mexico. Pleoticus robustus is the only deep-water shrimp that is supporting fishery activities in USA waters of the Gulf of Mexico.

I.3 Scientific sampling method. Sampling of benthic communities (1999-2010) was carried out day and night using a single semi-commercial shrimp trawl net (18 m mouth aperture, 4.5 cm stretched mesh body and 1.5 cm stretched mesh cod-end) after surveying the bottom with a sub-bottom profiler echosounder. When finding appropriate bottoms for trawling, exploratory trawling was done during 30 minutes at a speed of 2.5-3 knots. Distance travelled by the net was measured using the ship's high precision GPS; the distance covered in 30 minutes varied between 0.8 and 1.2 nautical miles, depending on sea conditions.

I.4. Catch statistics. In the Gulf of Mexico, the most important deep-water shrimp species (in terms of biomass) were A. foliacea, A. edwardsiana and P. robustus, which together represented about 90% of the total weight catch (Fig. 5). Their mean sizes were also the largest ones registered along the scientific survey, varying between 35 and almost 60 mm CL. The remaining 10% of the deep-water shrimp biomass was constituted by A. antillensis, P. serrata and P. americanus, which were very abundant in some samples, but mean size of these species was comparatively small. The smallest species was P. americanus with a mean size of 22.5 mm CL (Table 1).

Catch per unit effort (CPUE) in kilograms per hour was used as an index of deep-water shrimp abundance and was arranged by 100 m depth strata. CPUE in the scientific survey varied from values near zero (0.02 kg/h) to a maximum CPUE of 16.4 kg [h.sup.-1]. Catch rates showed high variability between different strata and geographical areas sampled. This agrees well with the typical patchy distribution of deep-water shrimps (Anderson & Lindner, 1971; D'Onghia et al., 1998; Belcari et al., 2003). Nonetheless, higher catches were consistently found in the 300-700 m depth interval (Fig. 6). The catch rates obtained in the Gulf of Mexico scientific survey are within the range of CPUE values reported for several deep-water shrimp fisheries in the world: for example, in Latin America, there are high mean annual CPUE values reported for A. edwardsiana fisheries in Brazil from 4.7 to 14 kg [h.sup.-1] (Dallagnolo et al., 2009a). On the other hand, CPUE values reported for A. foliacea and A. antillensis from the Brazilian deep-water shrimp fisheries are considerably lower, varying between 0.76-6.3 kg (this paper) and 0.005-2.4 kg (Dallagnolo et al., 2009a), respectively. CPUE registered in deepwater shrimp fisheries for A. foliacea and A. antennnatus in the Mediterranean Sea and eastern Atlantic off Portugal have a range similar to the CPUE obtained in the Gulf of Mexico (0-12 kg [h.sup.-1]) (D'Onghia et al., 1998; Figueiredo et al., 2001; Carbonell & Azevedo, 2003; Can & Aktas, 2005). Also, Pezutto et al. (2006) have reported CPUE figures for A. edwardsiana in the southern region and the northern border of the ZEE Brazil that varied between 6.5 to 9.7 kg [h.sup.-1].

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

Deep-water shrimp catch rates recorded in the Gulf of Mexico seem to be lower than the mean annual CPUE of some of the deep-water fisheries conducted in the world. However, results of an exploratory scientific survey maybe not totally comparable to those of commercial fishing operations of a specialized fleet of commercial trawlers. Statistics of a developed fishery are more precise due to a larger fishing effort and an increased knowledge concerning profitable fishing grounds. Nevertheless, the CPUE recorded in the Gulf of Mexico serves as an index of the abundance of deep-water shrimp. Gracia et al. (2010) pointed out that about 40% of the hauls in the SW Gulf of Mexico resulted in high catch rates of above 5 kg [h.sup.-1]. It is also important to highlight that deep-water shrimp CPUEs compare well with, and sometimes are even higher than current CPUEs obtained in the depleted coastal white and pink shrimp fisheries (1.1-10 kg) of the Mexican Gulf of Mexico (INAPESCA, 2009). These two coastal species play an important role in sustaining local shrimp fisheries in Mexico in spite of the apparent overexploitation of these resources.

Deep-water shrimp abundance indexes recorded for the Gulf of Mexico, as well as the extent of its potential distribution area between 300 and 1000 m depth (about 60,000 [km.sup.2]; Fig. 7) reinforce the expectation that these species may represent a valuable fishing resource. In this large area there is a complex topography, including basins and submarine canyons, occasionally with high concentrations of deep-water shrimps (Fig. 7). It seems unlikely, however, that this potential fishery resource may reach the high yields obtained in the coastal brown shrimp (F. aztecus) fishery (annual production of 7,000 metric ton with a CPUE per net between 20-65 kg [h.sup.-1] (INAPESCA, 2010), whose stock is in good conditions and currently sustains the entire shrimp industry of the Gulf of Mexico (Gracia, 2004). However, the results obtained during the scientific research program seems to indicate that this potential fishing resource may render similar or even higher yields than those in the depleted coastal white (L. setiferus) and pink (F. duorarum) shrimp stocks; the annual production of these resources decreased to around 75 and 600 ton, respectively (Gracia, 2004; INAPESCA, 2005). It is difficult to estimate potential landing figures for these deep-water shrimps in the Gulf of Mexico with the currently available data, but it is reasonable to assume that the production will be low according to what usually occurs in established deepwater fisheries in other parts of the world (Jones et al., 1994; Politou et al., 2003; Pezutto et al., 2006). However, even if a relatively small-scale fishery can be established, it still could represent a valuable alternative fishing resource for the troubled Mexican shrimp industry of the Gulf of Mexico.

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

I.5. Conclusions. Developing this potential deepwater shrimp fishery requires an integrative research initiative that should consider the following aspects: 1) stock assessment of deep-water shrimps; 2) delimitation of fishing grounds, and 3) establishment of exploitation levels for these shrimps. Management strategies should include the use of the by-catch, which is composed mostly by other less abundant shrimps (mainly pandalid shrimps), geryonid crabs, deep-sea lobsters, and fishes that could be of commercial importance. Concurrently, it would be recommendable to develop processing and marketing strategies in order to obtain the maximum profit of these potential fishing resources.

The sustainable utilization of this potential deepwater shrimp resource will require reliable information on the biology and ecology of these deepwater shrimp species, especially on mortality and growth rates, life cycle history, and population renewal rates. Initiatives for an ecosystem-based management would be important to minimize possible impacts on the deep-sea ecosystem. This information is critical to define management strategies directed toward a sustainable use of these resources. Finally, we suggest that existing experiences (mainly in Latin America) concerning the responsible use of this deepwater shrimp resource should be consulted and adapted to the present situation in order to help in the development of management strategies that permit a maximum sustainable yield of this fragile fishing resource while minimizing the environmental impact of this fishery.

II. CENTRAL AMERICA

II.1. Introduction. Central American fisheries targeting crustaceans have focused on shallow water species of the Pacific coast. Information about the exploitation of deep-water decapods is scarce and poorly documented in national fishery statistics; for example, catches of Heterocarpus spp. were pooled until 1995 in Costa Rican statistics. Moreover, it seems advisable to interpret with caution the official statistics per country, because they are generally based upon the numbers provided by the fishing industry; there are no established procedures to validate the obtained data and to estimate unreported landings (FAO-OSPESCA, 2006). It might be possible that deep-water shrimps are fished in several countries of the region; however, official reports about these decapods are only available for Nicaragua and Costa Rica. The importance of deep-water shrimp fisheries for the region is difficult to assess; at least in Costa Rica the landings of the three commercially exploited deep-water shrimps (see below) comprised more than 50% of the annual shrimps landings between 1995 and 2005 (Wehrtmann & Nielsen-Munoz, 2006; Alvarez & Ross-Salazar, 2010), but this scenario is most probably not representative for the entire Central American region.

II.2. Presentation of the species. Three species are the target of commercial deep-water shrimp fisheries in Central America: the two pandalid species Heterocarpus vicarius and H. affinis, and the solenocerid shrimp Solenocera agassizii.

Heterocarpus vicarius Faxon, 1893 (northern nylon shrimp; local name: "camaron camello" or "camaron camellito") (Fig. 8). This pandalid shrimp is distributed between Gulf of California (Mexico) and Peru (Holthuis, 1980; Hendrickx et al., 1998). This species has been reported between 73 and 760 m, and was caught in traps at depths of up to 1454 m (Hendrickx 1995). According to Holthuis (1980), H. vicarius reaches a maximum size of 110 mm total length (TL) and 29 mm carapace length (CL); Hendrickx et al. (1998) collected this pandalid shrimp in the southeastern Gulf of California, Mexico, and specimens ranged in size from 10.5 to 33.0 mm CL, but most individuals belonged to the 16-26 mm (CL) size classes. The reproductive biology of H. vicarius in Costa Rica has been studied by Echeverria-Saenz & Wehrtmann (2011): ovigerous females measured between 29.4 and 45.4 mm CL and carried on average 15,008 newly-extruded eggs. During the incubation period, egg volume increased by 53.3%, while egg mortality during embryogenesis was estimated by 46.9%. Freshly-extruded eggs have an average volume of 0.045 [mm.sup.3], those close to hatching 0.069 [mm.sup.3], which corresponds to an egg volume increase during the incubation period of 53.3%. The average reproductive output was 0.178 and not statistically significant different with female size. Ovigerous females can be found year-round, but are more abundant between June-July and September-October (Wehrtmann & Nielsen-Munoz, 2009). However, during their August-cruise in 1991, Hendrickx et al. (1998) collected only four ovigerous females of H. vicarius, and the size of these specimens ranged from 23.3 to 23.9 mm CL.

[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]

Heterocarpus affinis Faxon, 1893 (three-spined nylon shrimp; local name: "camaron camellon" or "camaron real") (Fig. 9). Our knowledge about this pandalid shrimp is far from complete. The species is known to occur from the Gulf of California, Mexico, to approximately 8[degrees]43'S, Peru (Hendrickx & Wicksten, 1989), and has been collected between 760 and 1240 m depth (Hendrickx & Wicksten, 1989; Hendrickx, 2003). According to Hendrickx (2003), the species can attain a maximum size of 153 mm TL.

Solenocera agassizii Faxon, 1893 (kolibri shrimp; local name: "camaron fidel") (Fig. 10). The third commercially exploited species in the Central American region is S. agassizii, known to occur from Nicaragua to Peru (see Wehrtmann & Nielsen-Munoz, 2009). It has been reported from depths between 16 and 350 m (Holthuis, 1980; Hendrickx, 1995), typically associated with mud and sandy-mud bottoms. The species reproduces year-round (Villalobos-Rojas, 2009). Villalobos-Rojas & Wehrtmann (2011) described the ovarian development of this species and found four developmental stages, which can be grouped in "not visible" and "visible" based on the observation of the ovary through the exoskeleton in fresh specimens. Males and females can reach sizes ofup to 115 and 154 mm TL, respectively (Hendrickx, 1995; Wehrtmann & Nielsen-Munoz, 2009).

[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]

II.3. Fishing fleet. Deep-water shrimps are fished in Central America with bottom trawling nets. The technical details regarding these shrimp trawlers may vary locally; however, the shrimpers typically use the "Florida type" boat with two lateral nets (Fig. 11). These vessels usually have a length of 16 to 24 m (Costa Rica: Alvarez & Ross-Salazar, 2010) and 18 to 21 m (Nicaragua: INPESCA, 2008), and are powered by an engine of approximately 300 HP. The net has a length a 48 m, and the cod end of the net typically measures 37.7 mm between knots; mesh size in the other parts of the net varies between 40 and 50 mm. The crew consists of 5-6 fishermen, and the duration of each haul may vary between two and five hours. Additional information concerning the characteristics of the semi-industrial shrimp fishery in Costa Rica has been published by Bolanos (2005) and Alvarez & Ross-Salazar (2010).

[FIGURE 11 OMITTED]

II.4. Statistics. Although deep-water shrimps might be mentioned somehow in national fishery reports, as far as we know, official data are only available from Nicaragua and Costa Rica.

Nicaragua. The commercial deep-water fishery is geographically concentrated in the Gulf of Fonseca (13[degrees]02'N, 87[degrees]48'W) and the Estero Real (12[degrees]57N, 87[degrees]25'W), Pacific coast of Nicaragua. The fishery statistics of the Instituto Nicaraguense de la Pesca y Acuicultura (INPESCA) only mention deep-water shrimp as Heterocarpus spp., most probably referring to H. vicarius and H. affinis. According to these statistics (Fig. 12), highest landings were recorded in 1995 with 156,943 kg. However, since 2006 no more landings have been reported (INPESCA, 2008; OSPESCA, 2009). During 1993 and 2007, the number of operating deep-water shrimp trawlers varied between one and three (excluding those yearswhen no boats were fishing).

[FIGURE 12 OMITTED]

Costa Rica. Although being the largest of the three exploited deep-water shrimp species, H. affinis plays only a marginal role when considering the annual landings. According to the available statistics of the "Instituto Costarricense de Pesca y Acuicultura" (INCOPESCA), commercial exploitation of this shrimp started in 1995, and during the following years landings increased steadily, reaching its highest annual landings in 2003 with 225,277 kg. Thereafter, landings decreased considerably; officially, no landings were reported for 2006, and a total of 69,111 kg for 2007. As far as we know, H. affinis is currently fished only in negligible quantities.

Specific information about the reported landings of H. vicarius is only available since 1995, because during previous years, INCOPESCA combined the data from H. affinis and H. vicarius, making it impossible to separate the annual production of these two species. Landings peaked in 1996 with 539,101 kg and decreased constantly until 1999 (Fig. 13). Subsequently, reported landings increased steadily until 2003 (316,745 kg), but thereafter catches decreased again; landings in 2007 reached 25,073 kg, currently representing the last value available from INCOPESCA. According to our information (R. Diers, The Rainbow Jewels S.A., Puntarenas; pers. comm.), landings during 2008 and 2010 remained on very low levels.

The solenocerid shrimp Solenocera agassizii can be considered as the most important shrimp in the commercial deep-water shrimp fishery in Costa Rica (Wehrtmann & Nielsen-Munoz, 2009). Annual landing of this species represented 27% (1995-2000) and 29% (2001-2006) of the total shrimp landings in Costa Rica. By far, the highest annual landings (2.6 x [10.sup.6] kg), were reported in 1986 (Fig. 14). The next but substantially lower peak (0.9 x [10.sup.6] kg), was observed between 1994-1995. Subsequently, catches dropped again and increased only after 2003, probably related to the fishing activities of The Rainbow Jewels S.A., a company, especially interested in this resource. The official statistics seem to indicate peak landings roughly every 10 years, however, always on lower levels.

[FIGURE 13 OMITTED]

II.5. Bycatch and discards. As far as we know, Costa Rica is the only Central American country with information about the bycatch and discards associated with the deep-water shrimp fishery. In general, the entire bycatch is discarded, including squat lobsters (Pleuroncodes monodon), which are the target of a commercial fishery in other regions (Wehrtmann & Acuna, 2011). Several attempts to convince local fishermen and companies to utilize this resource in Costa Rica have not yet been successful.

Wehrtmann & Echeverria-Saenz (2007) analyzed the crustacean fauna associated with the deep-water shrimp fishery (H. vicarius and S. agassizii) along the Pacific coast Costa Rica: three species dominated the bycatch, namely Squilla biformis Bigelow, 1891 (Squillidae), Plesionika trispinus Squires & Barragan, 1976 (Pandalidae), and Pleuroncodes monodon H. Milne Edwards, 1837 (Galatheidae). More recent data (Fig. 15) indicated that S. biformes and fishes remained to be the predominant bycatch, while the pandalid shrimp P. trispinus practically disappeared from the catches since 2006. During 2008-2010, the squat lobster P. monodon was substantially less abundant when compared to the years 2004 and 2007.

[FIGURE 14 OMITTED]

Interestingly, a research cruise carried out in March 2011 covering the entire Pacific coast of Costa Rica revealed the massive presence of siphonophores in the trawling nets fishing at depths between 150 and 350 m (Fig. 16). This finding may indicate significant changes in this fishery-based ecosystem, where trawling may have eliminated filter and detritus feeders, increasing scarcity of organisms feeding on phytoplankton and marine snow (see Pauly et al., 2009). It is speculated that such a condition may have favored the siphonophore outbreak observed along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. The sudden massive appearance of "jellyfish" requires further attention.

II.6. Conclusions. In Central America, deep-water shrimps are currently commercially exploited only in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. To the best of our knowledge, neither country has implemented a management plan for the deep-water resources. Due to the decreasing landings and increasing costs, more and more companies leave their trawlers in the harbor. This may favor the recovery of the stressed deepwater habitats, but will provoke also considerable social and economic consequences. The introduction of fishing restrictions and the implementation of a management plan, based on solid scientific data, seems to be indispensable to prevent the complete collapse of the shrimp resources (see Wehrtmann & Nielsen-Munoz, 2009; Alvarez & Ross-Salazar, 2010). In this context, it is strongly recommended to improve collaboration between all relevant stakeholders (e.g. fishing sector, governmental sector, academic sector), thus facilitating information exchange regarding deep-water shrimp resources in order to support adequate decisions concerning fishing regulations at a national and regional level.

[FIGURE 15 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 16 OMITTED]

III. PERU

III.1. Introduction. Before the mid 1960s, it was assumed that the benthic and benthopelagic fauna off the Peruvian coast was poor, mostly probably due to the observed oxygen deficiency (Schweigger, 1943; Popovici, 1963), which supposedly prevented the presence of commercially interesting aggregations of groundfish. However, results published by Del Solar et al. (1965) revealed a rich biocenosis in deep-water environments off Peru, characterized by low oxygen contents with Peruvian hake (Merluccius gayi peruanus) as the characteristic and indicator species. Since the 1960s, a hake trawl fishery was developed, becoming one of the most important fisheries in Peru (Wosnitza-Mendo et al., 2007; Guevara-Carrasco & Lleonart, 2008).

An exploratory and experimental deep-water fishing using nontraditional gears and fishing methods was developed in 2001, revealing the presence of king crabs (Lithodidae) off Callao (12[degrees]S). These crabs were considered as a potential and alternative resource for a nontraditional trap fishery (Salazar et al., 2001). Thus, in 2003 a trap fishery for king crab Paralomis longipes begun, reaching a maximum yield of 9.4 ton in June 2008; during 2009 and 2010 landings of this king crab fishery declined considerably (S. Aguilar, IMARPE, pers. comm.).

The Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) is the target of another deep-water fishery in Peru carried out by a small fleet (5-6 boats) using longlines. This species is included in the Peruvian landing statistics since 1995 (Sancho, 2002). Fishing takes place along the Peruvian coast, from Salaverry (08[degrees]S) to Ilo (18[degrees]S), and at depths between 1000 and 1500 m. In recent years (2005 to 2010) the average yearly landing was of 130.3 ton (V. Aramayo, IMARPE, pers. comm.).

Since the middle 1960's, the Peruvian Marine Research Institute (IMARPE) has carried out research cruises along the Peruvian coast to investigate the archibenthic and bathyal fauna. The results of these cruises revealed the presence of more than 250 species and contributed significantly to our knowledge on the deep-water fauna (Del Solar & Alamo, 1970; Del Solar & Mistakidis, 1971; Vilchez et al, 1971; Del Solar & Flores, 1972; Kameya et al., 1997; JDSTA IMARPE, 2004; Barriga et al., 2009). The following species of deep-water shrimps stand out due to their wide distribution and abundance in Peruvian waters: Haliporoides diomedeae, Benthesicymus tanneri, Nematocarcinus agassizii, Heterocarpus vicarius, H. hostilis, and Pasiphaea magna. Several studies were carried out to describe the biology and population dynamic of these decapods in order to generate enough information to promote sustainable fisheries targeting these potential resources (Mendez, 1981; Kameya et al., 1997; Barriga et al., 2009).

More recently (between 2007 and 2010), four research cruises were carried out by IMARPE, with the Spanish research vessel "Miguel Oliver", to characterize the principal faunal components of the bentho-demersal subsystem of the bathyal and archibenthic zones (between 200 to 1500 m depth) off the Peruvian coast from Puerto Pizarro (03[degrees]30'S) to Morro Sama (18[degrees]00'S). A bottom trawl (randomly stratified sampling) and the swept area method were applied to determine the distribution and relative abundance of the fauna (Alverson & Pereyra, 1969; Espino & Wosnitza-Mendo, 1984; Sparre & Venema, 1995). The total area was divided in eight zones (two zones per cruise) and three depth strata (200 to 500 m, 500 to 1000 m, and 1000 to 1500 m depth). A total of 272 hauls (30 min of effective trawling) were carried out with a mean speed of approximately three knots using a bottom net type LOFOTEN (for details see Barriga et al., 2009). The following sections synthesize the principal results concerning the distribution and abundance of deep-water shrimps in Peruvian waters.

III.2. Presentation of the species

Haliporoides diomedeae Faxon, 1893 (red royal shrimp; local names: "gamba" in Chile, "langostino rojo de profundidad" or "gamba roja" in Peru) (Fig. 17). Details concerning the morphological characteristics of the species were described by PerezIllanes & Zuniga (1972), Farfante (1977) and Mendez (1981). This species, from the Panamanian and Chilean-Peruvian marine zoographic provinces, has been recorded from the Gulf of Panama (07[degrees]10N) to Chiloe Island in Chile (42[degrees]30'S), representing a distance of more than 4,500 km along the Pacific coast of South America (Bahamonde, 1963; Chirichigno, 1970; Noziglia & Arana, 1976; Perez-Farfante, 1977; Arana et al., 2003b, 2003c) (Fig. 18). The species prefers soft and muddy bottoms (Mistakidis & Henriquez, 1966; Del Solar & Mistakidis, 1971; Vilchez et al., 1971; Del Solar & Flores, 1972; Noziglia & Arana, 1976). Relatively high abundances of H. diomedeae seem to be associated to large river mouths such as the Guayas River (Ecuador), rivers of the northern coast of Peru (Banco de Mancora), and off Maipo and Bio-Bio rivers in the central-southern coast of Chile.

The bathymetric distribution of H. diomedeae changes with latitude, with a distinct deepening from south to north. The presence of the species, at large depths, may be related to the physical characteristics of the Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW), where the temperature oscillates between 7.5[degrees]C and 3.5[degrees]C. It is assumed that a reverse relationship exists between the species abundance and the intensification of these water mass in the southeastern Pacific (Noziglia & Arana, 1976).

All investigations have indicated H. diomedeae as the most important deep-water shrimp in Peru due to several reasons: (1) its wide distribution and abundance, (2) being a key component in the benthodemersal community, and (3) its potential for the development of a commercial fishery, mainly off the northern coast of Peru (Del Solar & Alamo, 1970; Velez et al, 1992; Kameya et al, 2006). In Peru, H. diomedeae is widely distributed between 600 and more than 1500 m deep. Three areas of high abundance were detected: (1) north of 08[degrees]S (Malabrigo), where the highest biomass was observed in concentrations around 50 and more than 150 kg [km.sup.-2], (mean about 139 kg [km.sup.-2], especially in hauls deeper than 600 m); (2) the area between 08[degrees]S (Malabrigo) and 16[degrees]S (San Juan de Marcona); in this zone, between 08[degrees]S and 09[degrees]S, the species was present in low abundances (16 kg [km.sup.-2]) and almost absent in the remaining area; (3) south of 16[degrees]S, where H. diomedeae was found to be present in low abundances (mean biomass was 8.7 kg [km.sup.-2]), mainly between 700 y 1200 m depth (Fig. 19).

[FIGURE 17 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 18 OMITTED]

Benthesicymus tanneri Faxon, 1893 (red royal shrimp; local name: "gamba" in Chile, "langostino rojo de profundidad" or "gamba roja" in Peru). Mendez (1981) described morphological characteristics of this species from Peruvian material. B. tanneri is known to occur in Gulf of California, Panama, Colombia, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador and Peru. This species is soft and fragile, and rarely arrives at the surface intact. So, it would be a poor candidate for a fishery. Male and female shrimps collected on the continental slope off Peru ranged in size between 13.5-25.0 mm and 11.0-30.7 mm CL, respectively (Mendez, 1981). The results of our recent studies (2007-2010) confirm a wide distribution of B. tanneri in Peruvian waters between 600 and 1500 m depth; mean biomass was estimated to be 9.2 kg [km.sup.-2], and the areas of highest concentrations were located north of 10[degrees]S (Huarmey) (Fig. 19).

[FIGURE 19 OMITTED]

Nematocarcinus agassizii Faxon, 1893 (local name: "camaron rojo de profundidad"). This deep-water shrimp belongs to the family Nematocarcinidae and it is adapted to walk on the soft bottom seafloor covering the continental slope (Mendez, 1981). Morphological characteristics of Peruvian specimens were described by Mendez (1981), and the size of males and females collected by IMARPE varied between 17.2-20.2 mm CL and 17.4-26.0 mm CL, respectively.

Scientific cruises carried out between 2007 to 2010 revealed the presence of N. agassizii in the northern zone (Fig. 19), with highest abundances off Tumbes (until 04[degrees]10'S) between 500 and 800 m depth: the mean biomass was around 12 kg [km.sup.-2], ranging from 0.5 to 45 kg km-2. The southern boundary was observed to be located off Chimbote (11[degrees]S). A few individuals were observed also off Ilo (17[degrees]30'S), thus expanding the geographic distribution reported by Mendez (1981); she indicated the limit at 16[degrees]30'S based on observations published by Del Solar & Flores, 1972).

Heterocarpus vicarius Faxon, 1893 (northern nylon shrimp; local name in Peru: "camaron rojo de profundidad" or "camaron nylon) (Fig. 8). The geographic distribution of this pandalid shrimp extends from the Gulf of California to southern Peru (Mendez, 1981). In Peru, this benthic shrimp inhabits the continental slope between Banco de Mancora (03[degrees]24'S) and Mollendo (17[degrees]S); its vertical distribution ranges from 383 to 800 m (Mendez, 1981). Results of our scientific cruises carried out between 2007 and 2010 indicated highest biomass in areas north of Paita (05[degrees]00'S) at depths below 500 m, where the biomass was generally higher than 50 kg [km.sup.-2] with a mean of 125 kg [km.sup.-2]. South of Paita the species was less abundant (<0.5 kg [km.sup.-2]), and few individuals were collected off Ilo (17[degrees]37'S), probably indicating the southern border of its distribution in Peruvian waters (Fig. 19).

Heterocarpus hostilis Faxon, 1893 (local name: "camaron nailon"). This pandalid shrimp is distributed from Gulf of Panama to Isla del Coco in Peru. Del Solar (1972) reported the species in Peru from 3[degrees]30'S to 10[degrees]5'S, occurring at depths between 695 and 800 m. Morphological characteristics of H. hostilis in Peru are described by Mendez (1981). The results of the scientific cruises carried out between 2007 and 2010 (Fig. 19) showed that the species is common and abundant (between 0.5 and 50 kg [km.sup.-2]) north of 11[degrees]00'S (Huacho), mainly concentrated in depths over 1000 m.

Pasiphaea magna Faxon, 1893 (local name in Peru: "camaron vidrio"). Morphology, distribution and commercial importance in Peru were described by Mendez (1981). This shrimp is a pelagic species, which occurs as "accidental catch" in benthic trawls. The species is distributed along the Peruvian coast, inhabiting bathyal and archibenthic zones between 600 m and 1500 m. According to the results of the scientific cruises (2007-2010), this shrimp is not very abundant (mean biomass was 1.3 kg [km.sup.-2]), with the exception of an area off Tumbes (north of 04[degrees]00'S), where biomass values reached up to 50 kg [km.sup.-2] (Fig. 19).

III. 3. Fisheries, actual status of resources and

perspectives. So far, no commercial deep-water shrimp fishery has been implemented in Peru. Therefore, the six potentially exploitable resources described above are virtually in pristine conditions, not subject to fishing pressure. Small amounts of these shrimps are accidentally caught as by-catch by industrial trawlers operating in northern Peru. Future strategies to begin any commercial exploitation of these species should consider the ecosystem approach, especially in northern Peru where the highest abundances and the greatest biological diversity of the bentho-demersal subsystem in Peruvian waters has been found.

IV. CHILE

IV. 1. Introduction. After World War II, Chile experienced a remarkable development of its fisheries, which reached record landings exceeding 8 million ton by 1994. Although most captures involved pelagic fish species, benthic crustaceans inhabiting coastal areas or the continental shelf, such as crabs (Cancer spp., Homalaspis plana), yellow squat lobster (Cervimunida johni) and red squat lobster (Pleuroncodes monodon) were also extracted.

Since the mid-1900s, and with the arrival of larger and more powerful trawlers, offshore fishing operations started to be conducted along the Chilean coast. At the same time, the exploitation of the nylon shrimp (Heterocarpus reedi) began, achieving a record of 72,194 ton of landed shrimps in 1976. Nylon shrimp landings subsequently and progressively decreased, which promoted the search of new resources by researchers and companies, especially towards deeper waters. Besides the nylon shrimp, two other shrimp species with potential for a commercial exploitation were found in deep waters: the red royal shrimp (Haliporoides diomedeae) and the razor shrimp (Campylonotus semistriatus). These three species have been intensively studied, and the present review summarizes the obtained results.

Landing statistics for the last five years showed that the national extraction of decapod crustaceans have ranged between 20,000 and 25,000 ton [yr.sup.-1]; the deep-water decapods, living in waters exceeding the 200 m depth, represent between 25% and 30% of the total catches of this taxonomic group (SERNAPESCA, Anuarios Estadisticos de Pesca, Chile 20052010; www.sernapesca.cl).

IV.2. Heterocarpus reedi Bahamonde, 1955 (Chilean nylon shrimp: local name: "camaron nailon") (Fig. 20). The morphological characteristics of the species have been described by Bahamonde (1955), Illanes & Zuniga (1971) and Retamal (2000).

IV.2.1. Distribution. The geographical distribution of H. reedi comprises the area off central-northern to central-southern Chile, between 23[degrees]48'S (south of Antofagasta) and 39[degrees]00'S (Puerto Saavedra). Moreover, the presence of H. reedi has also been reported offshore Peru (Vilchez et al., 1971). In Chile, the spatial coverage between Antofagasta (23[degrees]30'S) and Coquimbo (30[degrees]30'S) is almost continuous. In contrast, the presence of the resource is scattered in the southern part of its distribution, forming small patches towards the north and south of the Rio Maipo Canyon in the O'Higgins Region (33[degrees]30'S) and off Punta Nugurne in the Maule Region (35[degrees]55'S). Therefore, the fishing fleet has been operating mainly between Chanaral and Talcahuano (Fig. 21). For descriptive and administrative purposes, the fishery of H. reedi is divided into two different macro-zones: the northern macro-zone (between 21[degrees]25'S and 32[degrees]10'S; Antofagasta, Atacama and Coquimbo regions) and the southern macro-zone (between 32[degrees]10'S and 38[degrees]28'S; Valparaiso, O'Higgins, Maule and Bio Bio regions).

[FIGURE 20 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 21 OMITTED]

The nylon shrimp lives in the continental slope at depths ranging between 155 and 800 m (Yanez, 1973, 1974; Yanez & Barbieri, 1974). Heterocarpus reedi occurs in an area where Subsurface Equatorial Water (ESSW) and Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW) mix between 200 and 500 m. According to Arana & Nakanishi (1971) and Arana et al. (1975), the depth changes of these water masses and the upwelling processes observed alongshore the Chilean coast promote the depth-related movement of this resource perpendicular to the coast. As suggested by the same authors, ovigerous females move towards shallower waters to release their larvae and later return to deeper waters. However, the nylon shrimp fisheries operate mainly at depths between the 150 and 500 m.

IV.2.2. Habitat. This shrimp is generally found on mud bottoms, sedimentary rock, muddy sands and sandstone. According to Acuna et al. (2009), 70% of the observations correspond to catches over fine sand and 25.7% over medium sand grain.

IV.2.3. Life history parameters. The species presents sexual dimorphism, which is externally not evident. The embryonic development and reproductive potential have been studied by different authors (Bahamonde, 1958; Bahamonde & Lopez, 1960; Palma, 1996; Palma & Ulloa, 1998; Wehrtmann & Andrade, 1998, Acuna et al., 2003). The nylon shrimp produces between 1,912 and 27,237 eggs in females among 22 and 38 mm of CL (Arana et al., 1976; Wehrtmann & Andrade, 1998). The mean size at maturity is reached between 21.3 and 26.4 mm CL (3.5-4.5 yr approximately) (Arana et al., 1976; Acuna et al., 2003).

The presence of ovigerous females extends from April to December (Arana & Tiffou, 1970; Arana et al., 1976); almost 100% of females carry eggs under the abdomen between May-November (Arana et al., 1976), and the release of their larvae occurs towards late winter and early spring (September-November), involving densities that may exceed 200 larvae per 1000 [m.sup.-3] (Galvez, 1997; Roa et al., 1999; Acuna et al., 2007a).

Females grow larger than males; maximum sizes correspond to 43 and 40 mm CL for females and males, respectively (Arana et al., 1976; Roa & Ernst, 1996).

In general, the global sexual proportion shows a female predominance (57%) over males (43%) (Arana et al., 1976). Females are predominant among individuals smaller than 20 mm CL, while males prevail in size classes between 20 and 25 mm CL; finally, in sizes >25 mm CL, females become progressively more abundant until reaching 100% in specimens measuring >34 mm CL (Gaete & Arana, 1986).

According to Arana et al. (1976), the principal molting periods include March-May, July-September and November-January, a feature that may be associated to variations of the condition factor (Yany, 1974) and the chemical composition of the abdominal muscle. The molting increase varies between 9.710.6% and 7.2-8.9% in females and males, respectively (Arana et al., 1976).

Growth of H. reedi has been studied by Ziller (1993), who established the following growth parameters: [L.sub.[infinity]] = 37.67 mm CL; k = 0.343 y [t.sub.o] = -0.117 in males and [L.sub.[infinity]] = 43.87; k = 0.305 and [t.sub.o] =-0.17 in females. Roa & Ernst (1996) pointed out that the exploited fraction of the H. reedi population is comprised of five different annual classes, with clearly distinctive growth parameters between sexes, and values of [L.sub.[infinity]] = 40.68; k = 0.199 and [t.sub.o] =-0.809 for males and [L.sub.[infinity]] = 48.34 mm CL; k = 0.174 and [t.sub.o] =-0.51 for females.

The catch composition varies with zone and depth, where H. reedi is fished (Andrade & Baez, 1980; Acuna et al., 2005; Orellana, 2006). In general, the main by-catch species in the northern macro-zone are the red squat lobster (Pleuroncodes monodon), yellow squat lobster (Cervimunida johni), spider crab (Lophorochinia parabranchia), common hake (Merluccius gayi gayi), bigeye flounder (Hippoglossina macrops) and Aconcagua grenadier (Coelorinchus aconcagua) and Chilean rattail (C. chilensis). In the southern macro-zone, on the other hand, the main components of the bycatch are: the common hake, yellow squat lobster, spider crab (Libidoclaea granaria), bigeye flounder and Aconcagua grenadier. The catch index revealed that the by-catch averages 1.5 kg per kilogram of nylon shrimp (Orellana, 2006). The nylon shrimp represents a weight average of 81.8% of the total commercial catch (Zilleruelo & Parraga, 2009).

The shrimp shows a detrivorous diet with an omnivorous regime, mainly characterized by sediments, Foraminifera, sponges, gastropods, Ophiuroidea and decapod remains (Baez & Andrade, 1980).

The main predators of this species include the bigeye flounder (Hippoglossina macrops) (see Acuna et al., 2007a), the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) (see Flores & Rojas, 1987), the kingklip (Genypterus blacodes) (see Andrade, 1986) and the common hake (Merluccius gayi gayi) (see Hoyl, 1967).

IV.2.4. Fisheries gear. Polyamide bottom trawling net with metallic gangways and 5 cm uniform meshes (2 inches), similar to those used in Chilean knife shrimp (Haliporoides diomedeae) fisheries are employed in the commercial fisheries of H. reedi.

Selectivity studies of trawling nets (considering the mean size at first maturity of 25 mm CL in females) revealed that mesh size should be at least 59 mm (2.5") to protect 50% of the females; such mesh size would slightly "overprotect" males as they show smaller sizes and would probably mature earlier (ECM, 2000a).

IV.2.5. Fishery statistics and management. The nylon shrimp sustains the main shrimp fisheries in Chile, regularly exploited by industrial and artisanal fishery fleets. The commercial exploitation of this resource started in the 1950s as by-catch of the common hake fishery (Merluccius gayi gayi); subsequently it became a significant target resource as landing exceeded the 11,000 ton in 1968. Thereafter, a progressive decrease in the landing levels was observed, reaching 2,700 ton in 1980, to remain stable for a period of seven years around 3,000 ton. During the next years, a sustained increase in landing was observed until 1995-1996, when they once again exceeded 10,000 ton yr-1 (Fig. 22).

By late 1994, the nylon shrimp fisheries were subjected to a general access regime (i.e. free access). In 1995, it was declared as in a Full Exploitation State and regime. At the same time the fishing unit of the nylon shrimp (H. reedi) was defined as the fishing area covering the coast between the northern limit of Antofagasta (21[degrees]25'S) and the southern limit of Bio-Bio (38[degrees]28'S), from the eastern limit five miles offshore to the western limit corresponding to an imaginary line drawn at a 60-mile distance (Decree MINECOM No.611 of 1995). This measure implicated the establishment of a global annual fishing quota, and the closure of the fisheries register for new applications for vessels and fishermen. Additionally, a biologically-based seasonal closure was established in the entire fishing area, from 01 July to 31 August of each calendar year. During the closed season it was forbidden to catch, market, transport, process and store the banned species and its derived products (SUBPESCA Decree No.92 of 1998).

Subsequently in 2001, the fisheries were subjected to the Maximum Catch Limit per ship-owner, which involved the annual distribution of the global annual catch quota allocating 80% to the industrial sector (divided among ship-owners with valid fishing permits to execute extractive activities) and the remaining 20% to the artisanal sector. In addition to the latter measures, since 2003 the global fishing quota was divided per administrative region in order to avoid the concentration of fishing efforts and adapt the amount to be extracted according to the resource availability. Likewise, and aiming to achieve a year-round exploitation, the quota assigned to each region was subdivided into three periods: January-March, April-August and September-December.

[FIGURE 22 OMITTED]

Once the status of this fishery changed, quotas of 10,000 ton were established for 1996 and 1997, which were later reduced to 8,300 ton [yr.sup.-1] (1998) and 7,900 ton [yr.sup.-1] (1999). Since 2000, the global annual quotas have remained between 4,000 and 5,000 ton [yr.sup.-1] (2010) (Table 2). A 5,200 ton quota has been set for 2011 (SUBPESCA, 2010).

A total of 26 industrial trawlers (Fig. 23) and five artisanal boats have been traditionally operating for this fishery, which executed nearly 2,500 hauls per year, with a mean duration of 2.5 h each. The yield has reached values close to 300 kg of nylon shrimp per trawling hour (t.h.) in the northern macro-zone, over 400 kg [t.h.sup.-1] in the southern macro-zone with an average of nearly 350 kg [t.h.sup.-1] (Zilleruelo & Parraga, 2009).

IV.2.6. Current situation of the resource. Since 1998, the nylon shrimp has been periodically studied through monitoring surveys (Acuna et al., 1999, 2000a, 2001), indirect stock assessment (Acuna et al., 1997b; Canales et al., 1998), and direct assessment cruises to determine the biomass vulnerable to trawling gears using the catch swept area method (Acuna & Arancibia, 1996, Pavez, 1996; Roa et al., 1999; Acuna et al., 2000b, 2002, 2007b, 2009; ECM, 2000b; Arana et al., 2003a, 2004, 2005, 2006).

During the last ten years, a gradual change of the available biomass of the resource has been observed: from 10,000 ton in 1998 to a reported biomass oscillating between 28,000 and 30,000 ton in 2008 (Table 3). Consequently, Canales & Arana (2010) demonstrated that the catch per unit area (CPUA) increased from 532 kg [km.sup.-2] in 1998 to more than 4,000 kg [km.sup.-2] in 2006. This shows that the implementation of low catch quotas for this fishery has achieved a gradual recovery of the species, equivalent to an exploitation rate of 15% in the last year (Acuna et al., 2009). The implementation of global catch quotas below 5,000 ton would maintain the status quo situation for the exploitation of H. reedi, contributing to the maintenance and recuperation and thus avoiding overexploitation of the resource.

[FIGURE 23 OMITTED]

IV.2.7. Commercialization. Nylon shrimp catches are used for different marketing processes. The main process is freezing (peeled-tails, IQF), followed by fresh-chilled and dehydatation. Production excesses (carapace, appendix and exoskeletons) are used in flour production. Top-quality product volumes in the industry have remained between 700-850 ton yr-1 during the last years. The most significant markets for frozen products are Germany (44%), Japan (24%), Taiwan (15%), Denmark (8%) and UK (5%); the remaining 4% goes to different locations. Local markets offer fresh unpeeled shrimp tails.

IV.2.8. Conclusions. Although a significant recovery of the nylon shrimp biomass has been observed, during the past 10 years the stock still has not consolidated at catch levels over 5,000 ton [yr.sup.-1]. A better chance of recovery may be achieved with annual catches lower then the aforementioned, thus allowing an increase in the current biomass and achieve exploitation rates of the order of 10%.

IV.3. Haliporoides diomedeae (Faxon, 1893) (Fig. 17)

IV.3.1. Distribution and life history charcteristics in Chile. Haliporoides diomedeae is distributed through a continuous "band" in the central area of Chile, occasionally interrupted by topographic features (San Antonio submarine canyon, 33[degrees]31'S) or non suitable areas for trawling such as Punta Duao (34[degrees]48'S) and Constitucion-Carranza (35[degrees]11'-35[degrees] 34'S). The species can be found between

400-1000 m off central Chile (Arana et al., 2003b) and in the southernmost area between 500-900 m (Leiva et al., 1997). Red royal shrimp concentrations during exploratory fishing were found to be associated with the approximate depth location of the 5[degrees]C isotherm (Noziglia & Arana, 1976). The species lives semi-buried in soft bottoms and associated with different decapods and fish species (Zilleruelo & Parranga, 2009). According to data obtained from the Chilean fisheries, H. diomedeae represents 52% of the weight catch in commercial hauls (Zilleruelo & Parraga, 2009).

The following species have been reported to prey on H. diomedeae: the Chilean seabass (Dissostichus eleginoides) (Yany & Moreno, 1975; Flores & Rojas, 1987), the big-eyed flounder (Hippoglossina macrops) (Yany & Moreno, 1975), the Chilean grenadier (Coelorynchus chilensis), the trident grenadier (Coryphaenoides delsolari), and grey grenadier (Trachyryncus villagai) (Henriquez et al., 1981).

The size of physical maturity of H. diomedeae in Chile is reached between 30.0 and 32.5 mm CL in males and 36.5 and 38.0 mm CL in females (Noziglia & Arana, 1976; Arana et al., 2003b). Males should reach maturity in the second year and females in the third year (Noziglia & Arana, 1976). Females grow faster (b=2.304) than males (b=1.994), which means that females are heavier than males for a given size (Arana & Cristi, 1971).

Both sexes show polymodal size frequency distributions, males with the most significant mode between 25 and 35 m CL and females between 30 and 50 mm CL (Arana et al., 2003b). The sexual proportion of the species reveals a clear female predominance in the catches (60%); small size-classes (<25 mm CL) are dominated (60-100%) by males, while in the larger size groups females comprise more than 80% (Gaete & Arana, 1986; Arana et al, 2003b).

IV.3.2. Fishing gear. The nets used in the H. diomedeae fisheries are similar to those previously described for the nylon shrimp (Heterocarpus reedi) fisheries.

IV.3.3. Fishery statistics and management. The extraction of the species started in the 1970s as an activity associated to the trawling fishing of H. reedi. However, the H. diomedeae fishery acquired more importance within the demersal crustacean fisheries off central Chile only since 1999 when the trawling fleet started to land volumes of certain commercial importance. Since 2001, the H. diomedeae fisheries represent an alternative in view of the restrictive measures implemented for other crustacean species commercially exploited off Chile. This allowed a gradual increase of the landings, reaching 705 ton in 2003, the highest annual value for H. diomedeae so far reported for Chile. Thereafter, catches have decreased, with landings at levels between 90 and 215 ton [yr.sup.-1] (Fig. 24).

The latitudinal distribution of the resource may be compared to that of H. reedi, although at a higher depth. In Chile, for administrative purposes, red royal shrimp fisheries cover the maritime area between 18[degrees]21'S and 43[degrees]44'S. However, commercial fisheries of the species are executed principally between 32[degrees]S and 36[degrees]S as accompanying fauna of the nylon shrimp fisheries; occasionally hauls are carried out to specifically catch H. diomedeae. Through the analysis of 6,043 hauls of the industrial and artisanal fleet, Parraga et al. (2010) were able to document that higher catch rates (37 and 62 kg per trawling hour) were obtained between 33[degrees]53'S and 34[degrees]41'S at depths exceeding 500 m; trawling was more successful between November and March (53 kg per trawling hour) than between April and October (42 kg per trawling hour).

IV.3.4. Current status of the resource. The red royal shrimp fisheries are managed under the "General Access Regime" (Ley General de Pesca y Acuicultura, Chile). Its commercial exploitation is restricted to catches of the trawling fleet dedicated to fish and other benthic crustaceans.

IV.3.5. Commercialization. The species shows a fast post-catch deterioration caused by melanosis (blackening). The species undergoes different production processes to be commercialized as raw, cooked and frozen (peeled tails, IQF) products, and deveined or undeveined (stomach). Local markets offer fresh tails.

IV.3.6. Conclusions. Fishing performance for the red royal shrimp is lower than those reported for other crustacean species currently exploited in Chilean waters. According to the estimated vulnerable biomass levels (Arana et al., 2002, 2003b), the resource does not allow the development of large-scale extraction activities; therefore, it is more likely that fishing of H. diomedeae act as a complementary activity to the exploitation of other resources such as H. reedi, P. monodon and C. johni. Notwithstanding, the red royal shrimp fisheries represent a relevant economic activity and an important alternative if other crustacean fisheries will be closed once the established quotas are achieved or biological or extractive close seasons are put into force.

IV.4. Campylonotus semistriatus Bate, 1888 (Razor shrimp, local name: "camaron navaja") (Fig. 25). Details concerning the morphological characteristics are provided by Boschi et al. (1992) and Retamal & Gorny (2001).

IV.4.1. Distribution. The species occurs only in southern South America, and it is present in both the southern Pacific and southern Atlantic (Boschi, 2000). Its geographic distribution in Argentina (Boschi, 2000) covers the area between the San Jorge Gulf (46[degrees]S) and Cape Horn (56[degrees]S), and in Chile it has been reported from Caldera (27[degrees]05'S) to Cape Horn (56[degrees]S) (Retamal, 1974, 1994; Henriquez et al., 1981; Arntz et al., 1999; Retamal & Gorny, 2001; Guzman & Quiroga, 2005; Arana & Ahumada, 2006). It has been suggested that the distribution of this species extends to the north of the Peruvian-Chilean province, and may be even found in southern Peru (Mendez, 1981).

In Argentina, the species occurs between 35 and 545 m (Boschi et al., 1992); in Valparaiso (Chile), C. semistriatus has been extracted between 200 and 955 m (Arana & Ahumada, 2006), while its bathymetric distribution in the southernmost area of Chile reaches down to 1,000 m (Leiva et al., 1997).

IV.4.2. Habitat. This shrimp is found off the central Chilean coast associated with the Antarctic Intermediate Water mass (AAIW), located between 400-1,000 m of depth. This water mass is characterized by low temperatures (4[degrees] to 7[degrees]C), along with minimum salinities (>34.4), high oxygen content (>2.5 mL [L.sup.-1]) and relative low in nutrient contents (Arana et al., 1976). The razor shrimp inhabits mainly muddy sand bottoms (Arana et al., 1976).

IV.4.3. Life history parameters. In general, our knowledge about life history features of representatives of the Campylonotidae is limited. They seem to have a short larval development, undergoing at least two zoeal stages and a decapodid stage (Thatje et al., 2001). Descriptions of the first larval stages and a key for their identification have been provided by Thatje et al. (2001).

[FIGURE 24 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 25 OMITTED]

In Argentinean waters, C. semistriatus is the largest species among the three congeneric species (C. vagans, C. capensis, C. semistriatus) found in the southern Atlantic, with sizes between 17.0 and 35.5 mm CL (Torti & Boschi, 1973). In commercial hauls carried out off central Chile, the size of C. semistriatus varied between 11 and 37 mm CL; mean lengths in males was 19.8 mm and 25.9 mm CL in females, indicating a clear size difference between sexes (Arana et al, 2002, 2003b). Arana & Ahumada (2006) emphasized the possible existence of a relationship between the mean size of individuals and the depth of catch, meaning that size increases with depth, so that the largest mean sizes can be found between 700 and 800 m.

Females are more abundant than males (male-female proportion of 1:2.3) in the catches (Arana & Ahumada, 2006). Small individuals are generally males, while females are predominant in specimens > 25 m CL; the sex ratio is 1:1 in individuals measuring around 21 mm CL (Arana & Ahumada, 2006). These size and sex patterns have led to the conclusion of a possible consecutive protandric hermaphroditism in the species (Torti & Boschi, 1973) from Argentinean waters, with intersex individuals between 22.3 and 25.5 mm CL. This trait, however, is yet to be confirmed for C. semistriatus inhabiting Chilean waters.

Females reach sexual maturity between 21.1 and 23.4 mm CL (Arana et al., 2003b). The parameters of the size-weight relationship indicate a negative allo-metric growth for this shrimp with b values between 2.57 and 2.66 for males and 2.59 and 2.67 for females (Arana & Ahumada, 2006).

IV.4.4. Fishing gear. The nets used in the C. semistriatus fisheries are similar to those already described for the nylon shrimp (H. reedi) and the red royal shrimp (H. diomedeae) fisheries.

IV.4.5. Fishery history. Since this shrimp lives below the depth range where the industrial fleet operates, the available information about this resource corresponds mainly to the results obtained from exploratory or stock assessment studies (Arana et al., 2002, 2003b; Arana & Ahumada, 2006). Currently, C. semistriatus is extracted as part of the by-catch of the nylon shrimp fishery operating in the deepest distribution stratum of H. reedi or, more commonly, associated with the H. diomedeae fishery, carried out in depth ranges similar to those established for the razor shrimp.

Yields obtained for C. semistriatus range from 2 to 3 kg per trawling hour (Arana et al., 2003b, 2003c), and its density varies between 0.1 and 804.3 kg [km.sup.-2], with a global mean close to 150 kg [km.sup.-2] (Arana & Ahumada, 2006).

IV.4.6. Current status of the resource. The resource is only caught as bycatch of H. reedi and H. diomedeae fisheries with only a few ton per year. Currently, its exploitation is not regulated nor subordinated to any extraction regime.

IV.4.7. Commercialization. Campylonotus semistriatus is used for different production processes, and are commercialized as frozen (peeled-tails, IQF) and fresh-chilled products.

IV.4.8. Conclusions. The offshore waters of northern and central Chile have been for several decades the area of an active crustacean fishery carried out by the commercial trawling fleet. These fisheries are mainly targeting the nylon shrimp (H. reedi), the yellow squat lobster (Cervimunida johni), and the red squat lobster (Pleuroncodes monodon), representing the raw material for high added-value products. Due to the reduction of the fishing quotas in the aforementioned species, despite its relatively low abundance and the great depth where the larger individuals occur, the razor shrimp (C. semistriatus) may become a resource to be extracted as a complementary species to the previously mentioned species (Arana & Ahumada, 2006).

IV.5. General conclusions. The pandalid H. reedi is the main shrimp species exploited in Chilean waters, and has supported a relevant fishery due to its available biomass. This scenario has promoted the development of significant fishing activities, which involve an important industrial fleet exploiting this resource. Moreover, the nylon shrimp fishery maintains several companies dedicated to the processing and commercialization of these products for the international markets, which, in turn, generated numerous employment opportunities.

The historical fluctuations observed in H. reedi landings require especial attention when implementing management measures; the resource needs to be monitored periodically in order to analyze its condition, to assess accordingly annual global catch quotas and to promote administrative measures to facilitate a sustainable exploitation of this shrimp.

In the case of the red royal shrimp (H. diomedeae) and the razor shrimp (C. semistriatus), assessments (Arana et al., 2003b; Arana & Ahumada, 2006) have shown considerably lower biomasses compared to those reported for the nylon shrimp (H. reedi); moreover, the distribution of these species seems to be patchy and confined to few specific areas. Consequently, the exploitation of these (by-catch) species must be carefully observed to avoid overfishing and to permit a sustainable use of these deep-water shrimp resources.

V. BRAZIL

V.1. Introduction and presentation of the species

Marine shrimp fisheries in Brazil have been traditionally targeted to coastal penaeoids (i.e. Farfantepenaeus subtilis, F. paulensis, F. brasiliensis, Litopenaeus schmitti, Xiphopenaeus kroyeri, Artemesia longinaris, Pleoticus muelleri) distributed both on continental shelf bottoms and estuaries (D'Incao et al., 2002; Aragao et al., 2005; Carvalho, 2005).

Essentially artisanal in its beginning, the activity rapidly diversified from mid 1960's to early 1970's, as a response to government efforts to develop industrial fleets and facilities in Brazil. While well succeeded in adding a new scale to the national shrimp fisheries, building up an excessive fishing capacity coupled with management weakness lead to an overexploitation of most Brazilian shrimp stocks in a few years (Valentini & Pezzuto, 2006).

This scenario remained quite unchanged up to late 1990's, when local industrial trawler fleets expanded their operations to deeper areas of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), in search of new and profitable resources which could compensate economic losses faced in the traditional coastal fishing grounds (Perez et al., 2001). Concurrently, a new governmental policy trying to develop deep-water fisheries in Brazil has started, inaugurating a new chapter in its fishery history. This policy was based upon implementing a program of specialized foreign vessels chartered by national companies, which lasted for nearly 11 years. Both processes, mediated by learning and technological adaptations of the local fleets, have resulted in the establishment of new foreign and domestic fisheries, including bottom gillnetting for the monkfish (Lophius gastrophisus), trawling for Argentine hake (Merluccius hubbsi), Brazilian codling (Urophycis mystacea) and Argentine squid (Illex argentinus) and potting for geryonid crabs (Chaceon spp.) (see review in Perez et al., 2009a).

After some individuals had been caught incidentally in the year 2000, a deep-water shrimp fishery also emerged in 2003, when two foreign vessels started to target three valuable species pertaining to the family Aristeidae (see Pezzuto et al., 2006): the scarlet shrimp (locally called "carabinero"), Aristaeopsis edwardsiana (Johnson, 1867) (Fig. 2); the giant red shrimp (locally called "moruno"), Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) (Fig. 1), and the purplehead gamba prawn (locally called "alistado" shrimp) Aristeus antillensis A. Milne Edwards & Bouvier, 1909 (Fig. 4). A brief summary about the distribution and ecology of these three species can be found in the present review, in the chapter about Mexico. This episode inaugurated a new Aristeidae fishery in Latin America. However, "carabinero" and "alistado" shrimps have long been seasonally exploited in French Guiana by local penaeid trawlers (Gueguen, 1998), while the "moruno" shrimp is known to sustain several well-established fisheries in Mediterranean waters (Sarda, 2000).

Since its recent development in Brazil, deep-water shrimp fishery and biology has been the focus of different publications, including Araujo-Silva et al. (2002a, 2002b), Asano Filho & Holanda (2005), Costa et al. (2005), Pezzuto et al. (2006), Pezzuto & Dias (2007), Serejo et al. (2007), Tavares & Serejo (2007), Dallagnolo (2008), Dias (2009), Dallagnolo et al. (2009a; 2009b), Perez et al. (2009a, 2009b) and Pezzuto & Dias (2009). These were based either on scientific surveys, or biological and fishing data collected aboard foreign commercial vessels, as 100% of their trips were mandatorily monitored by observers and Satellite Tracking systems.

V.2. Fishing fleets. The fishery developed along most of the Brazilian EEZ; however, the fishing activities were concentrated in 11 slope-fishing grounds situated between Espirito Santo (18oS) and Rio Grande do Sul (32oS) states (Fig. 26). Catches were obtained from a very narrow bathymetric stratum between 700 and 750 m depth (Dallagnollo et al., 2009a); this situation imposed severe technological constraints to the domestic trawlers accustomed to operate in areas shallower than 500 m at most.

Consequently, deep-water shrimp fishery in Brazil was dominated by eight foreign stern trawlers, chartered by national companies, and an additional nationalized vessel with similar characteristics. Most of them between 30 and 40 m length, powered by approximately 1,000 HP engines, both equipped with processing facilities and freezing chambers (Fig. 27). These trawlers were capable to perform fishing trips lasting over one month. A variety of bottom trawl nets were employed by the fleet, which differed mostly in head rope length (45 to 95 m) and mesh size (40 to 80 mm). Trawling velocity ranged between 2 and 3 knots, and towing lasted on average 4 h. Each trawl swept a linear extension of approximately 21 km (maximum 73 km) (Dallagnolo, 2008; Dallagnolo et al., 2009a).

V.3. Statistics. From 2002 to 2009, production of deep-water shrimps in Brazil summed a total of 719 ton (fresh weight). Aristaeopsis edwardsiana constituted the dominant species in the catches, accounting for 75.4% of the landings between 2002-2009. Catches of this species increased steadily from 13.0 ton in 2002 to 182.6 ton in 2005, declining to only 13.7 ton in 2009 (Table 4). While generally playing a secondary role in the fishery (20.6% of the total), Aristaeomorpha foliacea dominated in the fishing grounds N1 and C4 (Fig. 26), surpassing the production of A. edwardsiana (Dallagnolo et al., 2009a). Landings of this species increased continuously up to 2006, when a maximum of 51.7 ton was attained. Aristeus antillensis accounted only for 3% of the deep-water landings in Brazil. Its production increased from 0.3 ton in 2002 to 15.8 ton in 2005, but declined in the subsequent years (Table 1). Profitable catches of this species were obtained only in two small fishing grounds situated at nearly 19.5[degrees]S (Pezzuto & Dias, 2009).

As compared to the other species, A. edwardsiana produced the highest mean annual catch rates (4.7 to 14 kg [h.sup.-1]). However, they revealed a declining pattern in time, reducing between 26% and 61% depending on the fishing area. On the other hand, and in spite of being generally lower (0.76 to 6.3 kg [h.sup.-1]), mean catch rates of A. foliacea increased substantially at rates varying between 327% and 835%. Based on biological data published by Pezzuto & Dias (2007), Dallagnolo et al. (2009a) hypothesized that the inversion of the mean catch rates in A. edwardsiana and A. foliacea may be related to their different life strategies: the former species is larger and mature later in life, while the latter is smaller and presumably faster-growing. This difference may confer an advantage to A. foliacea in expanding its distribution and abundance after the massive removal of A. edwardsiana from the fishing grounds.

Aristaeus antillensis produced the lowest catch rates among the Brazilian deep-water shrimps (0.005 to 2.4 kg [h.sup.-1]), which decreased by 65% between 2004 and 2007 (Dallagnollo et al., 2009a). Such changes in commercial catch rates were confirmed by biomass assessments (Dallagnolo, 2008). As a consequence of declining yields and associated problems with the commercial viability, the fishery for the three species stopped in 2009. The production was entirely exported to European markets.

[FIGURE 26 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 27 OMITTED]

V.4. Management. A management plan for this fishery was developed, discussed and approved under the Consultant Committee for the Management of Deep-water Resources (Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture of Brazil) (Dallagnolo et al., 2009b). However, this plan was never implemented due to unclear reasons (see details of the Brazilian fishery institutional framework in Perez et al., 2009a). The plan included: limits to the fleet size (two vessels); fishing area (18o20'S to 28o30'S, 500-1000 m depth); a global total allowable catch (TAC) for the three species together (60 ton year-1): gear restrictions (stern trawl method, minimum cod-end mesh size 60 mm stretched): by-catch limits (Chaceon spp. 15% and L. gastrophysus 5% of the total catch); exclusion areas (a quadrant between Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo States, seamounts, coral bottoms and areas "N" of 21oS when catches of A. antillensis attain 4.4 ton); rotation of harvestable areas ("N" and "S" from the main exclusion quadrant); and control measures as logbooks, satellite tracking and observers in all trips.

V.5. Conclusions. The commercial exploitation of aristeid shrimp resources in Brazil developed as a typical "gold rush" fishery. The production peaked only four years after the start of directed foreign fleet operations and stopped four years later. In spite of the governmental decision to implement a mandatory and detailed observer program, coupled with scientific efforts, aiming at obtaining and processing timely information about the species, management measures were not enforced throughout the period. Overexploitation of the most abundant and valuable species (A. edwardsiana) was perceived in a few years (Dallagnolo, 2008). As a consequence, and even considering the concurrent increase in catch rates and yields of A. foliacea, this fishery turned economically unprofitable and was abandoned.

Contrary to the domestic gillnetting for monkfish and trawling for Argentine hake, Brazilian codling and Argentine squid fisheries in depths <500 m, which were made possible by minor modifications of existing vessels, technological and operational limitations impeded the development of a national fishery for aristeid shrimps in deeper areas of the Brazilian slope. While such restrictions would have contributed to alleviate the fishing pressure over the deep-water shrimp stocks, during the last years, governmental resistance to implement the respective management plan has placed the resource under potential risk.

VI. OTHER COUNTRIES

Deep-water shrimps are commercially exploited along the Pacific coast of Colombia. The term "deep-water" in Colombian fisheries refers to depths below 72 m (Puentes et al., 2007) or below 36 m (INVEMAR, 2009). According to INVEMAR (2009), commercially exploited deep-water shrimps include Solenocera agassizii as well as Farfantepenaeus brevirostris and F. californiensis (in the present review, we do not consider these two penaeid shrimps as deep-water species). Puentes et al. (2007) mentioned additionally Heterocarpus spp. (according to the authors H. vicarius and/or H. hostilis); however, these pandalid shrimps are not the target species and are obtained as by-catch associated to the fishery of the abovementioned three shrimp species. Puentes et al. (1994) and Rueda et al. (2004) provided a description of the shrimp trawler fleet operating in Pacific Colombia. In 1993, the deep-water shrimp trawler fleet consisted of 23 boats, while in 2003 17 boats were used exclusively to extract deep-water shrimps, and an additional seven trawlers were allowed to fish in both shallow-and deep-water grounds. The trawlers used for the deep-water shrimp fisheries have a length varying between 15.0 and 24.4 m, and most of them measure between 20-22 m (Rueda et al., 2004). Landings of the three above-mentioned deep-water shrimps varied between roughly 575 ton (1993) and 1240 ton (2000 and 2006); the most recent data (2008) indicate landings of 753 ton, comprised mainly (55.2%) of S. agassizii (INVEMAR, 2009). In the specific case of S. agassizii, reported landings peaked in 2003 with approximately 688 ton (Fig. 28); since 2006, catches tend to continuously decrease, reaching 118 ton in 2009 (Barreto et al., 2010). As mentioned by Barreto & Bordo (2008), 69% of the fished population of S. agassizii consists of immature individuals; these authors characterize this deep-water resource as fully exploited. The study of Puentes et al. (2007) revealed the presence of 54 fish species belonging to 35 families, 11 crustacean species within 11 families, and one mollusk species, as by-catch of the deep-water shrimp fishery in Colombia; all crustaceans, including species of potential commercial importance (Heterocarpus spp. and Pleuroncodes monodon) are considered as discards. Several authors (Pedraza et al., 2002; Rubio et al., 2005) indicated that a trap fishery for H. hostilis exists, operating between 600 and 900 m depth. As far as we know, no official statistics about this trap fishery are available, and this fishery has been abandoned (V. Puentes, Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial Colombia, pers. comm.) The incorporation of turtle excluder devices (TED), a fishing ban between January and February, and global catch quota ((for 2008: 930 ton for the three above-mentioned deep-water shrimp species (Barreto & Borda, 2008)) are the management strategies implemented by the Colombian authorities (Ruedo et al., 2004; Barreto & Borda, 2008; Barreto et al., 2010; Campo-Soto, 2010).

Two species have been the target of a traditional deep-water shrimp fishery in French Guiana (western central Atlantic): Solenocera acuminata Perez-Farfante & Bullis, 1973 and A. edwardsiana. This fishery started in 1988; S. acuminata was fished at night at depths of about 200 m, while the second species occurred predominantly at a depth between 600 and 700 m (Gueguen, 1998). Statistics concerning the annual catches of A. edwardsiana are available only until 1993 (see Gueguen, 1998): reported landings started in 1988 with 93 ton, decreased continuously to 34 ton in 1990, and reached its highest value in 1991 with 258 ton; thereafter, landings decreased again to 140 ton in 1993. According to Gueguen (1998), the CPUE of this fishery fluctuated between 0.341 ton [h.sup.-1] (1988) and 0.175 ton [h.sup.-1] (1990). It remains unclear whether this deep-water shrimp fishery in French Guiana is still active or has been abandoned.

[FIGURE 28 OMITTED]

VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Commercial deep-water fisheries are currently carried out in Chile, Colombia, and Costa Rica. Our compilation revealed the presence of a total of 17 deep-water shrimp species with different levels of potential for a commercial exploitation from Latin American offshore waters, including ten penaeoid and seven caridean species (Table 5). Currently, four species (Haliporoides diomedeae, Solenocera agassizii, Heterocarpus affinis, H. reedi and H. vicarius) are the target of a commercial fishery, and three other species (Aristaeomorpha foliacea, Aristaeopsis edwardsiana, and Aristeus antillensis) have been commercially exploited in Brazil, but these fisheries are now closed. Aristaeopsis edwardsiana have been reported also to support a seasonal fishery in French Guiana since 1988, but there are no data available about the current status of this fishery (Gueguen, 1998). While S. agassizii and H. vicarius are fished in Costa Rica and Colombia, the three aristeid species have been reported from both Brazil and Mexico, but they were exploited exclusively in Brazil.

To the best of our knowledge, an implemented management plan for the exploitation of deep-water shrimps only exists in Chile. However, in Colombia fishing closure (January and February) and annual catch quota were put into force to protect the deepwater shrimp resource (Barreto & Borda, 2008; Barreto et al., 2010; Campo Soto, 2010). In Brazil, detailed fishery regulations for the aristeid fishery were approved but never implemented. As a consequence, the main target-species (A. Edwardsiana) became rapidly overexploited, and the fisheries have been abandoned. In the remaining countries studied in the present review, there are no special management strategies directed towards the sustainability of these valuable deep-water resources.

Probably as a consequence of the lack of appropriate fishery regulations, the deep-water fishery in Costa Rica is about to collapse, despite the fact that different stakeholders requested twice a temporary closure of selected deep-water species (see Wehrtmann & Nielsen-Munoz, 2009). However, even if management plans would be implemented, the lack of efficient control mechanisms seems to be a typical problem in developing countries. Nevertheless, national fishery agencies have the responsibility to protect their marine resources and need to implement measures to avoid the ongoing deterioration of many Latin American deep-water shrimp resources.

The lack of adequate information about the biology of these deep-water shrimps represents an important impediment to the development of management strategies oriented towards the sustainability of these vulnerable resources (Bensch et al., 2008; Polidoro et al., 2008). Considering this situation, it becomes evident that more communication and collaboration between the different stakeholders in the Latin American region is needed. As a first step, it is recommendable the identification of the governmental and non-governmental institutions associated with and interested in the use of deep-water resources, in order to establish a Latin American network. It seems as well advisable to include interested parties from the Mediterranean region and other countries or regions, given their exhaustive experience with the biology of deep-water shrimps, including some of the same species as found in Latin America (e.g. Sarda et al., 2003, 2004; Politou et al., 2005). Such network building will facilitate the knowledge transfer between different countries and institutions. Another measure should be the creation of a website to compile available information about these deep-water resources. On a national level, it is suggested to digitize the so-called "grey literature". There is no question that many reports and thesis' containing valuable data about deep-water shrimps are stored somewhere, practically without public access. Therefore, and following the example of the Census of Marine Life project COMARGE (Continental Margins and Ecosystems) concerning squat lobsters (see http://decapoda.nhm.org/references/ squatlobsters.htm), scanning these documents and putting them on a website open to the public would be an important step to create an updated database. Such a searchable and constantly updated database will represent a valuable source of information for researchers and decision makers. Moreover, it will allow detecting gaps in the knowledge about these resources, and that should lead to the development of regional research plans aimed towards supporting measurements for a sustainable use of deep-water shrimps in Latin America.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We appreciate to have had the opportunity to present the results of our studies concerning deep-water shrimp fisheries during the "International Conference: Environment and Resources of the South Pacific", celebrated in November 2010 in Vina del Mar, Chile; and we are especially grateful for the invitation to submit a manuscript for the special volume of the Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, dedicated to the above-mentioned conference. ISW is thankful to The Rainbow Jewels, S.A. (Puntarenas, Costa Rica), the company Ristic AG (Oberferrieden, Germany) the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the Non-Governmental-Organization MarViva, and the Universidad de Costa Rica (project V.I. No. 111-A4508) for their financial and logistic support obtained to carry out part of the studies, which form the basis for this review. A very special thank goes to the crew of the shrimp trawlers of The Rainbow Jewels S.A., and to numerous students and assistants (Tayler McLellan Clarke, Silvia Echeverria, Patricio Hernaez, Juliana Herrera, Vanessa Nielsen-Munoz, Jaime Nivia, Fresia Villalobos, Edgar Villegas, just to mention some) who helped us during years to collect and analyze the data in Costa Rica. Mexico's study was supported by the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico through the project IN223109-3 of the Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico. EB is grateful to the Secretaria General del Mar de Espana, because the official cooperation agreement with the Instituto del Mar del Peru made it possible to carry out the benthodemersal studies along the Peruvian coast between 2007 and 2010. The part about the Colombian fishery was revised and improved by Vladimir Puentes (Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, Colombia), which is greatly appreciated. The authors would like to thank Tayler McLellan Clarke (UNIP-CIMAR), who carefully revised and substantially improved the English of an earlier version of the manuscript.

DOI: 10.3856/vol40-issue3-fulltext-2

REFERENCES

Acuna, E. & H. Arancibia. 1996. Evaluacion directa del stock de camaron nailon (Heterocarpus reedi) por el metodo de area barrida en la zona de operacion de la flota arrastrera de las regiones III y IV. Informe Final, Depto. Biologia Marina, Univ. Catolica del Norte, Sede Coquimbo, Depto. Oceanografia, Univ. de Concepcion, 71 pp.

Acuna, E., M.T. Gonzalez, M. Gonzalez. 2003. Pesquerias de langostinos y camaron nailon en el norte de Chile. In: E. Yanez (ed.). Actividad pesquera y de acuicultura en Chile. Esc. Ciencias del Mar, PUCV, 263-287.

Acuna, E., E. Perez & M.T. Gonzalez. 1999. Monitoreo de la pesqueria de crustaceos realizada por la flota de la IV Region, 1997-1998. Informe Final, Univ. Catolica del Norte, 104 pp.

Acuna, E., E. Perez & M.T. Gonzalez. 2000a. Monitoreo de la pesqueria de crustaceos realizada por la flota de la IV Region, 1999. Informe Final, Univ. Catolica del Norte, 76 pp.

Acuna, E., M. Gonzalez & E. Perez. 2001. Monitoreo de la pesqueria de crustaceos realizada por la flota de la IV Region, ano 2000. Informe Final, Univ. Catolica del Norte, 99 pp.

Acuna, E., J.C. Villarroel, M. Andrade & A. Cortes. 2005. Fauna acompanante en pesquerias de arrastre de crustaceos de Chile: implicancias y desafios desde la perspectiva de la biodiversidad. In: E. Figueroa (ed.). Biodiversidad marina: Valoracion, usos y perspectivas ?hacia donde va Chile? Programa Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Biodiversidad. Business & Economics, pp. 395-425.

Acuna, E., H. Arancibia, A. Mujica, L. Cid & R. Roa. 1997b. Analisis de la pesqueria y evaluacion indirecta del stock de langostino amarillo en la III y IV Regiones. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 96-08: 153 pp.

Acuna, E., H. Arancibia, L. Cid, R. Alarcon, L. Cubillos & A. Sepulveda. 2002. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones, ano 2001. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 2001-05: 209 pp.

Acuna, E., E. Perez, M. Berrios, L. Cid, J. Moraga, A. Mujica & R. Alarcon. 2000b. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones, 1999. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 99-08: 214 pp.

Acuna, E., R. Alarcon, H. Arancibia, M. Barros, L. Cid, A. Cortes, l. Cubillos & J. Pineda. 2009. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones, ano 2008. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 2008-17: 274 pp.

Acuna, E., M. Andrade, L. Cubillos, H. Arancibia, J. Moraga, A. Mujica, M. Berrios, D. Lancelloti, J.C. Villarroel, P. Haye & W. Stotz. 2007a. Determinacion de zonas y epocas de reclutamiento de camaron nailon, langostino amarillo y langostino colorado en las regiones III y IV, ano 2007. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 2004-45: 345 pp.

Acuna, E., J.C. Villarroel, A. Cortes, R. Alarcon, L. Cid, H. Arancibia, R. Leon, L. Cubillos, R. Bahamonde, C. Canales, C. Montenegro, B. Leiva & F. Contreras. 2007b. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones, ano 2006. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 2006-11: 275 pp.

Alvarez, J. & E. Ross-Salazar. 2010. La pesca de arrastre en Costa Rica. MarViva, San Jose, Costa Rica: 55 pp.

Alverson, D. & W. Pereyra. 1969. A study of demersal fishes and fisheries of the northeastern Pacific Ocean. An evaluation of exploratory fishing methods and analytical approaches to stock size and yield forecast. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 26: 1985-2001

Anderson, W.W. & M.J. Lindner. 1971. Contributions to the biology of the royal red shrimp, Hymenopenaeus robustus Smith. Fish. Bull., 69: 313-336.

Andrade, H. 1986. Observaciones bioecologicas sobre invertebrados demersales de la zona central de Chile. In: P. Arana (ed.), La pesca en Chile. Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, Valparaiso, 41-56.

Andrade, H. & P. Baez. 1980. Crustaceos decapodos asociados a la pesqueria de Heterocarpus reedi Bahamonde 1955 en la zona central de Chile. Bol. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Chile, 37: 261-267.

Aragao, J.A.N., K.C. Silva & I.H.A. Cintra. 2005. A pesca industrial de camarao na costa Norte. In: Oliveira, G.M. (org.). Pesca e Aquicultura no Brasil 1991/2000--Producao e Balanca Comercial. Ibama, Brasilia, pp. 51-54.

Arana, P. & M. Ahumada. 2006. Camaron navaja (Campylonotus semistriatus), crustaceo de aguas profundas frente a la costa central de Chile (Crustacea, Campylonotidae). Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 34(1): 3-14.

Arana, P. & A. Cristi. 1971. Parametros biometricos de la gamba (Hymenopenaeus diomedeae). Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 2(2): 21-40.

Arana, P. & A. Nakanishi. 1971. La pesqueria del camaron nylon (Heterocarpus reedi) frente a la costa de Valparaiso. Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 2(4): 61-92.

Arana, P. & M. Tiffou. 1970. Madurez sexual, sexualidad y fecundidad del camaron nylon (Heterocarpus reedi). Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 1(11): 261-284.

Arana, P., M. Ahumada y A. Guerrero. 2002. Pesca exploratoria de camarones de aguas profundas en las Regiones V y VI, ano 2002. Informe Final. Estud. Doc., Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, 20/2002: 167 pp.

Arana, P., M. Ahumada & A. Guerrero. 2003a. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones, ano 2002. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP No.2002-05. Estud. Doc., Pont. Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, 05/2003: 318 pp.

Arana, P., M. Ahumada & A. Guerrero. 2003b. Distribucion y abundancia de la gamba Haliporoides diomedeae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Penaeidae) frente a la costa central de Chile. Invest. Mar, Valparaiso, 31(2): 57-71.

Arana, P., J.A. Alvarez Perez & P.R. Pezzuto. 2009a. Deep-sea fisheries off Latin America: an introduction. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 37(3): 281-284.

Arana, P., L. Noziglia & G. Yany. 1976. Crecimiento, reproduccion, factor de condicion y estructura poblacional del camaron nylon (Heterocarpus reedi) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea). Cienc. Tecnol. Mar, 2: 3-98.

Arana, P., J.A. Perez & P.R. Pezzuto (eds.). 2009b. Deep-sea fisheries off Latin America. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 37(3): 1-576.

Arana, P., R. Bustos, M. Ahumada & A. Guerrero. 2003c. Distribucion y abundancia de los recursos gamba (Haliporoides diomedeae) y camaron navaja (Campylonotus semistriatus), en las Regiones V, VI y VII, ano 2003. Informe Final. Estud. Doc., Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, 17/2003: 141 pp.

Arana, P., T. Melo, L. Noziglia, J.I. Sepulveda, N. Silva, G. Yany & E. Yanez. 1975. Los recursos demersales de la region de Valparaiso, Chile. Rev. Com. Perm. Pacifico Sur, 3: 39-63.

Arana, P., M. Ahumada, A. Guerrero, S. Palma, P. Rosenberg, T. Melo, D. Queirolo, R. Bahamonde, M.A. Barbieri & C. Canales. 2004. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones, ano 2003. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 2003-05: 297 pp.

Arana, P., M. Ahumada, A. Guerrero, T. Melo, D. Queirolo, M.A. Barbieri, R. Bahamonde, C. Canales & J.C. Quiroz. 2006. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones, ano 2005. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 2005-08: 368 pp.

Arana, P., M. Ahumada, S. Palma, T. Melo, D. Queirolo, A. Guerrero, R. Bahamonde, M.A. Barbieri, J. Cortes, J.C. Quiroz & B. Leiva. 2005. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones, ano 2004. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 2004-10: 263 pp.

Araujo-Silva, K.C., A.P. M. Muniz, M. Ramos-Porto, G.F.S. Viana & I.H.A. Cintra. 2002a. Camaroes da superfamilia Penaeoidea Rafinesque, 1815, capturados durante pescarias experimentais para o Programa REVIZEE/Norte (Crustacea: Decapoda). Bol. Tec. Cient. CEPNOR, Belem, 2 (1): 9-40.

Araujo-Silva, K.C., M. Ramos-Porto, I.H.A. Cintra, A.P. M. Muniz & M.C.N. Silva. 2002b. Crustaceos capturados durante o Programa REVIZEE na costa norte brasileira. Bol. Tec. Cient. CEPNOR, Belem, 2(1): 97-108.

Arntz, W.E., M. Gorny, R. Soto, M.A. Lardies, M.A. Retamal & I.S. Wehrtmann. 1999. Species composition and distribution of decapod crustaceans in the waters off Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego, South America. Sci. Mar., 63 (Supl. 1): 303-314.

Asano Filho, M. & F.C.A.F. Holanda. 2005. Descricao dos metodos de captura dos camaroes de profundidade na costa norte do Brasil, durante o Projeto Proarrasto. Bol. Tec. Cient. CEPNOR, Belem, 5(1): 141-154.

Bahamonde, N. 1955. Hallazgo de una nueva especie de Heterocarpus, en aguas chilenas: H. reedi, n. sp. Invest. Zool. Chil., 2: 105-114.

Bahamonde, N. 1958. Sobre la fecundidad de la gamba o camaron nylon (Heterocarpus reedi Bahamonde). Invest. Zool. Chil., 4: 259-264.

Bahamonde, N. 1963. Decapodos de la fauna preabisal de Chile. Not. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat., Santiago, 81: 10 pp.

Bahamonde, N. & M.T. Lopez. 1960. Observaciones sobre la epoca de desove de la gamba (Heterocarpus reedi Bahamonde). Rev. Univ., Santiago, 44(5): 39-41.

Barreto, C.G. & C.A. Borda. 2008. Propuesta tecnica para la definicion de cuotas globales de pesca para Colombia, vigencia 2009. In: S.E. Munoz, V. Puentes, A.I. Sanabria, (eds.). Documento Tecnico concertado en el Comite Tecnico Interinstitucional. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, Ica, Ministerio de Ambiente y Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, 263 pp.

Barreto, C.G., C.A. Borda, C. Bustamante, L. Guillot-Illidge, C.L. Sanchez & L.F. Maldonado. 2010. Documento tecnico de cuotas globales 2010. Propuesta presentada al Comite Ejecutivo para la Pesca. Documento Subgerencia de Pesca y Acuicultura de INCODER, Direccion Tecnica de Investigacion, Ordenamiento y Fomento, 347 pp.

Barriga, E., C. Salazar, J. Palacios, M. Romero & A. Rodriguez. 2009. Distribucion, abundancia y estructura poblacional del langostino rojo de profundidad Haliporoides diomedeae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Solenoceridae) frente a la zona norte de Peru (2007-2008). Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 37(3): 371-380.

Belcari, P., C. Viva, M. Mori & S. de Ranieri. 2003. Fishery and biology of Aristaemorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) (Crustacea, Decapoda) in the northern Tyrenian Sea (westeren Mediterranean). J. Northwest. Atl. Fish. Sci., 31: 195-204.

Bensch, A., M. Gianni, D. Greboval, J. Sanders & A. Hjort. 2008. Worldwide review of bottom fisheries in the high seas. FAO Fish. Aquacult. Techn. Pap., 522: 1-145.

Bolanos, M. 2005. Costa Rica. Characterization of the Costa Rican semi-industrial coastal shrimp trawling fishery and the small scale artisanal shrimp trawling fishery. FAO Report Proj. EP/GLO/201/GEF: 1-39.

Boschi, E.E. 2000. Species of decapod crustaceans and their distribution in the American marine zoogeographic provinces. Rev. Invest. Des. Pesq., 13: 136 pp.

Boschi, E.E., C.E. Fischbach & M.I. Iorio. 1992. Catalogo ilustrado de los crustaceos estomatopodos y decapodos marinos de Argentina. Frente Marit., 10: 94 pp

Burukovsky, R.N. 2001. Taxonomy of Nematocarcinus (Decapoda, Nematocarcinidae). Description of Nematocarcinus from waters of the American continent [In Russian]. Zool. J., 80(12): 1429-1443.

Campo-Soto, R.J. 2010. Anexo 4: Pesca y Acuicultura Informe Gerente General INCODER Agosto 2006Agosto 2010. In: R.J. Campo Soto. Acta de Informe de Gestion del Gerente General del Instituto Colombiana de Desarrollo Rural--INCODER-INCODER (Agosto 2006-Agosto 2010). 33 pp.

Can, M.F. & M. Aktas.. 2005. A preliminary study on population structure and abundance of Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) in the deep water of the northeastern Mediterranean. Crustaceana, 78: 941-946.

Canales, C. & P. Arana. 2010. Estandarizacion de la captura por area barrida (CPUA) en cruceros de evaluacion directa de camaron nailon (Heterocarpus reedi) (1998-2006). Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 38(3): 387-402.

Canales, C., C. Montenegro, H. Pool, T. Penailillo & C. Vicencio. 1998. Evaluacion indirecta del stock de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 97-24: 139 pp.

Carbonell, A. & M. Azevedo. 2003. Application of non-equilibrium production models to the red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus, Risso, 1816) fishery in the northwestern Mediterranean. Fish. Res., 65: 323-334.

Carvalho, R.C.A. 2005. A pesca de camaroes de aguas rasas na regiao Nordeste. In: Oliveira, G.M. (org.) Pesca e Aquicultura no Brasil 1991/2000--Producao e Balanca Comercial. Ibama, Brasilia, pp. 47-50.

Cheung, W.W.L., T.J. Pitcher & D. Pauly. 2005. A fuzzy logic expert system to estimate intrinsic extinction vulnerabilities of marine fishes to fishing. Biol. Conserv., 124: 97-111.

Chirichigno, N. 1970. Lista de crustaceos del Peru (Decapoda y Stomatopoda). Bol. Inst. Mar Peru Callao, 35: 95 pp.

Comision Nacional de Pesca (CONAPESCA). 2008. Anuario Estadistico de Acuacultura y Pesca. Comision Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca, SAGARPA. Mazatlan, Mexico, 211 pp.

Costa, P.A.S., A.S. Martins, G. Olavo, M. Haimovici & A.C. Braga. 2005. Pesca exploratoria com arrasto de fundo no talude continental da regiao central da costa brasileira entre Salvador-BA e o Cabo de Sao Tome RJ. In: P.A.S. Costa, A.S. Martins & G. Olavo (eds.). Pesca e potenciais de exploracao de recursos vivos na regiao central da Zona Exonomica Exclusiva brasileira. Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro. Serie Livros. Documentos REVIZEE/SCORE Central, pp. 145-165.

Dallagnolo, R. 2008. A pesca dos camaroes-de-profundidade (Aristeidae) na regiao Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. MSc Thesis, Universidade do Vale do Itajai, Itajai, 197 pp.

Dallagnolo, R., J.A.A. Perez & P.R. Pezzuto. 2009b. O ordenamento da pescaria de camaroes-de-profundidade (Decapoda: Aristeidae) no sudeste e sul do Brasil. Braz. J. Aquat. Sci. Technol., 13(2): 31-43.

Dallagnolo, R., J.A. Alvarez Perez, P.R. Pezutto & R. Wahrlich. 2009a. The deep-sea shrimp fishery off Brazil (Decapoda: Aristeidae): development and present status. In: P. Arana, J.A.A. Perez & P.R. Pezutto (eds.). Deep-sea fisheries off Latin America. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 37(3): 327-346.

Del Solar, E. & V. Alamo. 1970. Exploracion sobre distribucion de langostinos y otros crustaceos de la zona norte. Crucero SNP-1 7009 (1era. Parte). Inst. Mar Peru. Ser. Inf. Esp., 70: 1-18.

Del Solar, E. & L. Flores. 1972. Exploracion de crustaceos (zona sur). Crucero SNP-1 7201 (1era. Parte). Inst. Mar Peru. Ser. Inf. Esp., 107: 1-8.

Del Solar, E. & M.N. Mistakidis. 1971. Informe del Crucero SNP-1 7105. Exploracion de crustaceos. Inst. Mar Peru. Ser. Inf. Esp., 89: 1-10.

Del Solar, E., J. Sanchez & Piazza, A. 1965. Exploracion de las areas de abundancia de merluza (Merluccius gayi peruanus), en la costa peruana a bordo del "Betina", 28 pp

Dias, M.C. 2009. A biologia dos camaroes-de-profundidade (Decapoda: Aristeidae) no talude do Sudeste e Sul do Brasil: reproducao e estrutura populacional. Bachelor Thesis. Universidade do Vale do Itajai, Itajai, 113 pp.

D'Incao, F., H. Valentini & L.F. Rodrigues. 2002. Avaliacao da pesca de camaroes nas regioes Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. 1965-1999. Atlantica, 24(2): 103-116.

D'Onghia, G., A. Tursi, P. Maiorano & M. Panza. 1998. Distribution, biology, and population dynamics of Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) (Decapoda, Natantia, Aristeidae) in the north-western Ionian Sea (Mediterranean Sea). Crustaceana, 71: 518-544.

Echeverria-Saenz, S. & I.S. Wehrtmann (2011). Egg production of the commercially exploited deep-water shrimp, Heterocarpus vicarius (Decapoda: Pandalidae), Pacific Costa Rica, Central America. J. Crust. Biol., 31(3): 434-440.

Escuela de Ciencias del Mar (ECM). 2000a. Selectividad de redes de arrastre en la pesqueria de camaron nailon. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 99-17: 347 pp.

Escuela de Ciencias del Mar (ECM). 2000b. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon, langostino amarillo y langostino colorado, ano 2000. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 2000-05: 216 pp.

Espino M., & C. Wosnitza-Mendo. 1984. Manuales de evaluacion de Peces No. 1. Area Barrida. Inf. Inst. Mar Peru, 86: 1-31.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2007. Report and documentation of the expert consultation on deepsea fisheries in the high seas. Bangkok, Thailand, 21-23 November 2006. FAO Fish. Rep., 838: 208 pp.

FAO-OSPESCA. 2006. Mejoramiento de los sistemas de informacion y recoleccion de datos pesqueros para America Central y el Caribe: Informe del Taller FAO/OSPESCA sobre el mejoramiento de los sistemas de informacion y recoleccion de datos pesqueros, San Salvador, El Salvador, 23-26 de enero 2006. Vol. 1: Informe del Taller, 41 pp.

Figueiredo, M.J., I. Figueiredo & P.B. Machado. 2001. Deep-water penaeid shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) from off the Portuguese continental slope: an alternative future resource? Fish. Res., 51: 321-326.

Flores, H. & P. Rojas. 1987. Contenido gastrico de Dissostichus eleginoides Smitt, 1898 capturado frente a Valparaiso (Perciformes, Notothenidae). Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 15: 33-40.

Flores, J., M.E. Hendrickx & H. Chapa-Saldana. 2004. Capturas del camaron mancha blanca, Pandalus platyceros Brandt, 1851 (Caridea: Pandalidae), en la costa oeste de Baja California, Mexico, con una breve revision de su biologia y su pesca. In: M.E. Hendrickx (ed.). Contributions to the study of east Pacific crustaceans 3. Inst. Cienc. Mar. Limnol., UNAM, Mexico, pp. 199-211.

Gaete, V. & P. Arana. 1986. Proporcion sexual en tres especies de camarones explotados frente a la costa central de Chile. Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 14: 45-67.

Galvez, M. 1997. Remocion del potencial reproductivo por efecto de la pesca: el caso del camaron nailon (Heterocarpus reedi Bahamonde, 1955). Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 25: 187-202.

Gracia, A. 1996. White shrimp (Penaeus setiferus) recruitment overfishing. Mar. Freshwat. Res., 47: 5965.

Gracia, A. 2001. Biotecnologia Marina y Acuacultura. In: F. Bolivar-Zapata (ed.). Biotecnologia Moderna para el Desarrollo de Mexico en el Siglo XXI: Retos y Oportunidades. S.E.P.-CONACYT: 209-222.

Gracia, A. 2004. Aprovechamiento y conservacion del recurso camaron. In: M. Caso, I. Pisanty, Ezcurra E. (Compiladores). Diagnostico ambiental del Golfo de Mexico. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Instituto Nacional de Ecologia, A.C., Harte Research Institute for the Gulf of Mexico Studies, Vol. 2: 713-725.

Gracia, A. & J.L. Hernandez-Aguilera. 2005. Camarones Penaeoideos. In: J.L. Hernandez-Aguilera, J.A.Ruiz-Nuno, R.E. Toral-Almazan & V. Arenas-Fuentes (eds.). Camarones, langostas y cangrejos de la Costa Este de Mexico. Estudio y Conservacion de la Nauraleza A.C./Comision Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad: 23-65.

Gracia, A. & A.R. Vazquez-Bader. 1999. Shrimp fisheries in the south Gulf of Mexico: present and future management alternatives. In: H. Kumpf, D. Steidinger & K. Sherman (eds.). The Gulf of Mexico large marine ecosystem: assessment, sustainability, and management. Blackwell Science, Berlin, pp. 205-234.

Gracia, A., A.R. Vazquez-Bader, E. Lozano-Alvarez & P. Briones-Fourzan. 2010. Deep-water shrimps (Crustacea: Penaeoidea) off the Yucatan Peninsula (southern Gulf of Mexico): a potential fishing resource? J. Shellfish Res., 29(1): 37-43.

Gueguen, F. 1998. Biologie de la crevette profonde Plesiopenaeus edwardsianus en Guyane Francaise. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 321: 757-770.

Gueguen, F. 2001. Notes sur la biologie de la crevette de profondeur Aristeus antillensis en Guyane Francaise. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 324: 689-700.

Guevara-Carrasco, R. & J. Lleonart. 2008. Dynamics and fishery of the Peruvian hake: between nature and man. J. Mar. Syst., 71: 249-259.

Guzman, G. & E. Quiroga. 2005. New records of shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea and Dendrobranchiata) in deep waters off Chile. Gayana, 69(2): 285-290.

Hendrickx, M.E. 1995. Camarones. In: W. Fischer, F. Krupp, W. Schneider, C. Sommer, K. Carpenter and V.H. Niem (eds.). Guia FAO para la identificacion de especies para los fines de la pesca. Pacifico centro-oriental. vol. I. Plantas e invertebrados. FAO, Roma, Italia, pp. 417-537.

Hendrickx, M.E. 2003. Size and abundance of deep water shrimps on the continental slope of the SE Gulf of California, Mexico. In: M.E. Hendrickx (ed.). Contributions to the study of east Pacific crustaceans 3. Inst. Cienc. Mar. Limnol., UNAM, Mexico, pp. 227-234.

Hendrickx, M.E. 2004. Distribution and estimation of body size and weight of four species of deep water shrimps in the southeastern Gulf of California, Mexico. Crustaceana, 76(9): 1025-1036.

Hendrickx, M.E. & M. Wicksten. 1989. Los Pandalidae (Crustacea: Caridea) del Pacifico mexicano, con una clave para su identificacion. Caldasia, 16(76): 71-86.

Hendrickx, M.E., F. Paez-Osuna & H.M. Zazueta-Padilla. 1998. Biology and biochemical composition of the deep-water shrimp Heterocarpus vicarius Faxon (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Pandalidae) from the southeastern Gulf of California, Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci., 63(2): 265-275.

Henriquez, G. 1982. Gamba, Haliporoides diomedeae (Faxon) Crustacea Decapoda Solenoceridae. In: Estado actual de las principales pesquerias nacionales. Bases para un desarrollo pesquero (Crustaceos). CORFO/IFOP: 15 pp.

Henriquez, G., L. Rodriguez & I. Kong. 1981. Exploracion y prospeccion de recursos pesqueros del talud continental. CORFO, AP 81/5: 82 pp.

Holthuis, L.B. 1980. Shrimps and prawns of the world. An annotated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Fish. Synop., 125: 1-271.

Hoyl, A. 1967. Alimentacion de la merluza (Merluccius gayi, Guichenot) en la zona de Valparaiso (Chile). Esc. Pesquerias y Alimentos, Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, no publicado.

Illanes, J.E. & O. Zuniga. 1971. Contribucion a la morfologia del camaron nylon (Heterocarpus reedi, Bahamonde) de la zona Central de Chile. Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 2(1): 1-20.

Illanes, J.E. & O. Zuniga. 1972. Contribucion a la morfologia de la "gamba" (Hymenopenaeus diomedeae, Faxon) de la zona central de Chile (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae). Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 3(1): 1-22.

Instituto Nacional de Pesca (INAPESCA). 2005. Fundamento tecnico para el establecimiento de vedas a la pesca de camaron en el Golfo de Mexico y Mar Caribe (2005). http://www.inapesca.gob.mx/portal/ sala-de-prensa/dictamenes/cat_view/16-camaron?start = 15. Reviewed: 18 January 2012.

Instituto Nacional de Pesca (INAPESCA). 2009. Analisis de la poblacion de camaron rosado (Farfantepenaeus duorarum) y camaron cafe (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) en la Sonda de Campeche y costa de Tabasco durante el periodo de veda del 2009. http://www.inapesca. gob.mx/portal/sala-de-prensa/dictamenes/cat_view/16 -camaron?start=10. Reviewed 18 January 2012.

Instituto Nacional de Pesca (INAPESCA). 2010. Estimacion de la fecha optima para la apertura de la temporada 2010-2011 de la pesqueria de camaron cafe (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) en las costas de Tamaulipas y Veracruz. http://www.inapesca.gob.mx/ portal/sala-de-prensa/dictamenes/cat_view/16-cama ron?start = 25. Reviewed 18 January 2012.

Instituto Nicaraguense de la Pesca y Acuicultura (INPESCA). 2008. Guia Indicativa. Nicaragua y el Sector Pesquero. Actualizacion al ano 2007. Centro de Investigaciones Pesqueras y Acuicolas (CIPA), Managua, Nicaragua. 75 pp.

Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras "Jose Benito Vives De Andreis" (INVEMAR). 2009. Informe del estado de los ambientes y recursos marinos y costeros en Colombia: Ano 2008. Ser.Publnes. Per. No.8: 244 pp.

JDSTA-IMARPE. 2004. Feasibility study for fishery development on pelagic and demersal fish in relation to the "El Nino" phenomenon by R/V Shinkai-Maru and R/V Humboldt Comprehensive Report, 76 pp.

Jennings, S., J.D. Reynolds & S.C. Mills. (1998) Life history correlates of responses to fisheries exploitation. Proc. Roy. Soc. London: Biol. Sci., 265: 333339.

Jones, C. J., J.M. Nance, & W.O. Antozzi Jr. 1994. A review of the royal red shrimp resource and fishery in the Gulf of Mexico. Tampa Fl., Gulf of Mexico Management Council, 14 pp.

Kameya A., R. Castillo, L. Escudero, E. Tello, V. Blaskovic, J. Cordova, Y. Hooker, M. Gutierrez & S. Mayor. 1997. Localizacion, distribucion y concentracion de langostinos rojos de profundidad, Crucero BIC Humboldt 9607-08 18 de julio al 06 de agosto de 1996. Pub. Esp. Inst. Mar Peru, 7: 1-47.

Kameya A., M. Romero & S. Zacarias. 2006. Peruvian deep ocean potential resources: fishes and shrimps. Deep Sea 2003: Conference on the Governance and Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries. Part 2: Conference poster papers and workshop papers. FAO Fish. Proc., 3/2: 40-41.

Leiva, B., R. Bahamonde, M. Donoso, A. Irrarrazabal, M.I Ortego & S. Pino. 1997. Prospeccion de recursos demersales em aguas exteriores de las Regiones X y XI. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP 95-19: 113 pp. anexos.

Mendez, M. 1981. Clave de identificacion y distribucion de los langostinos y camarones (Crustacea: Decapoda) del mar y rios de la costa de Peru. Bol. Inst. Mar-Peru, 5: 170 pp.

Mistakidis, M. & G. Henriquez. 1966. Informe sobre investigaciones exploratorias de langostinos y camarones en la zona Constitucion-Isla Mocha. Octubre-noviembre 1965. Publnes. Inst. Fom. Pesq., 16: 37 pp.

Morato, T., R. Watson, T.J. Pitcher & D. Pauly. 2006. Fishing down the deep. Fish Fisheries, 7: 23-33.

Noziglia, L. & P. Arana. 1976. Observaciones biologico-pesqueras de la gamba, Hymenopenaeus diomedeae Faxon, 1843 en el Pacifico Suroriental (Crustacea: Decapoda: Penaeidae). Rev. Com. Perm. Pacifico Sur, 5: 63-83.

Orellana, J.C. 2006. Indices de abundancia de las principales especies capturadas como fauna acompanante del camaron nailon durante los cruceros de evaluacion directa realizados entre 1998 y 2004. Proyecto de Titulo, Esc. Ciencias del Mar, Pont. Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, 196 pp.

Organizacion del Sector Pesquero y Acuicola del Itsmo Centroamericano (OSPESCA). 2009. Proyecto FIINPESCA--OSPESCA/FAO/SUECIA--GCP/RLA /150/SWE. Fortalecimiento de la investigacion interdisciplinaria para la pesca responsable en los paises centroamericanos. Indicadores macroeconomicos del sector pesquero y acuicola del istmo centroamericano. Periodo 2000-2007. Organizacion del Sector Pesquero y Acuicola del Istmo Centroamericano: Antiguo Cuscatlan, El Salvador, 94 pp.

Ostazeski, J. 1997. The deep-water shrimp fishery of the Northern Mariana Islands. SW Fish. Sci. Center Admin. Rep., H-97-10C: 1-39.

Palma, S. 1996. Desarrollo embrionario y fecundidad del camaron nailon, Heterocarpus reedi, capturado en la zona centro-norte de Chile. Mayo-agosto 1996. Estud. Doc., Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, 46/96: 87116.

Palma, S. & R. Ulloa. 1998. Aspectos reproductivos del camaron nailon Heterocarpus reedi, capturado en aguas de la zona norte y central de Chile (II a VIII Regiones). Estud. Doc., Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, 21/98: 1-22.

Parraga, D., M. Zilleruelo, C. Montenegro & E. Leal. 2010. Estandarizacion de las tasas de captura en la pesqueria de gamba (Haliporoides diomedeae) frente a la costa central de Chile, 2002-2008. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 38(1): 143-150.

Pauly, D. 2009. Beyond duplicity and ignorance in global fisheries. Sci. Mar., 73(2): 215-224.

Pauly, D., W. Graham, S. Libralato, L. Morisette & M.L.D. Palomares. 2009. Jellyfish in ecosystems, online databases, and ecosystem models. Hydro biologia, 616(1): 67-85.

Pavez, P. 1996. Evaluacion directa del stock de camaron nailon en la zona centro-norte de Chile. Estud. Doc., Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, 46/96: 337 pp.

Pedraza, M.J., E.A. Rubio & L.A. Zapata. 2002. Nuevo hallazgo del pez escorpion Pontinus sierra (Gilbert 1890) (Pisces: Osteichthyes: Scorpaenidae) en aguas del Oceano Pacifico Colombiano. Gayana, 66(1): 6972.

Perez, J.A.A., R. Wahrlich & P.R. Pezzuto. 2009a. Chartered trawling on slope areas off Brazil. Mar. Fish. Rev., 71(2): 24-36.

Perez, J.A.A., P.R. Pezzuto, R. Wahrlich & A. L.S. Soares. 2009b. Deep-water fisheries in Brazil: history, status and perspectives. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 37(3): 513-541.

Perez, J.A.A., P.R. Pezzuto, L.F. Rodrigues, H. Valentini & C.M. Vooren. 2001. Relatorio da reuniao tecnica de ordenamento da pesca demersal nas regioes Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. In: P.R. Pezzuto, J.A.A. Perez, L.F. Rodrigues & H. Valentini (eds.). Reunioes de ordenamento da pesca demersal no Sudeste e Sul do Brasil: 2000-2001. Notas Tec. FACIMAR, 5: 1-34.

Perez-Farfante, I. 1977. American solenocerid shrimps of the genera Hymenopenaeus, Haliporoides, Pleoticus, Hadropenaeus new genus, and Mesopenaeus new genus. Fish. Bull., 75(2): 261-346.

Perez-Farfante, I. & Bullis. 1973. Western Atlantic shrimps of the genus Solenocera with description of a new species (Crustacea: Decapoda: Penaeidae). Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 153: 1-33

Perez-Farfante, I. & B. Kensley. 1997. Penaeoid and sergestoid shrimps and prawns of the world: keys and diagnoses for the families and genera. Mem. Mus. Nat. d'Hist. Nat., Paris, 175: 1-233.

Pezzuto, P.R. & M.C. Dias. 2007. Estrutura populacional e reproducao dos camaroes-de-profundidade (Aristeidae) no talude do Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. Relatorio Tecnico apresentado a 5a Sessao Ordinaria do Subcomite Cientifico do Comite Consultivo Permanente de Gestao dos Recursos Demersais de Profundidade (CPG/Demersais)/SEAP/PR-Itajai, SC, 11-13/06/2007. Doc 21 SCC CPG 052007 P5.

Pezzuto, P.R. & M.C. Dias. 2009. Reproductive cycle and population structure of the deep-water shrimp Aristeus antillensis A. Milne Edwards & Bouvier, 1909 (Decapoda: Aristeidae) on southeast Brazilian continental slope. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 37(3): 443-454.

Pezzuto, P.R., J.A.A. Perez & R. Wahrlich. 2006. Deep-sea shrimps (Decapoda: Aristeidae): new targets of the deep-water trawling fishery in Brazil. Braz. J. Ocean., 54(2/3): 123-134

Polidoro, B.A, S.R. Livingstone, K.E. Carpenter, B. Hutchinson, R.B. Mast, N. Pilcher, Y. Sadovy de Mitcheson & S. Valenti. 2008. Status of the world's marine species. In: J.C. Vie, C. Hilton-Taylor & S.N. Stuart (eds.). The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland. Switzerland, pp. 1-7.

Politou, C.Y., P. Maiorano, G. D'Onghia & C. Mytilineou. 2005. Deep-water decapod crustacean fauna of the Eastern Ionian Sea. Belg. J. Zool., 135(2): 235-241.

Politou, C.Y., S. Kavadas, C. Mytilineou, A. Tursi, R. Carlucci & G. Lembo. 2003. Fisheries resource in the deep waters of the eastern Mediterranean (Greek Ionan Sea). J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci., 31: 35-46.

Popovici, Z. 1963. Corrientes oceanicas y la pesca peruana. Anuario de Pesca, 1961-1962, Lima, pp. 162-72.

Puentes, V., N. Madrid & L. A. Zapata. 1994. Estudio sobre la biologia, dinamica poblacional y pesqueria del camaron de aguas profundas Solenocera agassizi Faxon 1893 en el Pacifico colombiano. Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuicultura-INPA, Bol. Cient., 2: 124 -133.

Puentes, V., N. Madrid & L.A. Zapata. 2007. Catch composition of the deep sea shrimp fishery (Solenocera agassizi Faxon, 1893; Farfantepenaeus californiensis Holmes, 1900 and Farfantepenaeus brevirostris Kingsley, 1878) in the Colombian Pacific Ocean. Gayana, 71(1): 84-95.

Ragonese S., M. Zagra, L. Di Stefano & M.L. Bianchini. 2001. Effect of codend mesh size on the performance of the deep-water bottom trawl used in the red shrimp fishery Strait of Sicily (Mediterranean Sea). Hydrobiologia, 449: 279-291.

Ramirez-Llodra, E., P.A. Tyler, M.C. Baker, O.A. Bergstad, M.R. Clark, E. Escobar, L.A. Levin, L. Menot, A.A. Rowden, C.R. Smith & C.L. Van Dover. 2011. Man and the last great wilderness: human impact on deep sea. Plos One, 6(7): 1-25.

Retamal, M.A. 1974. Contribucion al conocimiento de los decapodos de la Region Magallanica. Gayana, Zool., 31: 1-23.

Retamal, M.A. 1994. Los Decapodos de Chile. Universidad de Concepcion, Direccion de Docencia, 256 pp.

Retamal, M.A. 2000. Decapodos de Chile. World Biodiversity Database CD-ROM Series. ETI-Univ. de Concepcion. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Retamal, M.A. & M. Gorny. 2001. Decapodos de los fiordos de Chile (CIMAR-FIORDO 3). Cienc. Tecnol. Mar, 24: 91-97.

Roa, R. & B. Ernst. 1996. Age structure, annual growth and variance of size-at-age of the shrimp (Heterocarpus reedi). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 137: 59-70.

Roa, R., F. Tapia, L. Cid, I. Lepez, C. Diaz & H. Arancibia. 1999. Evaluacion directa de camaron nailon entre la II y VIII Regiones. Informe Final, Proyecto FIP-IT/98-03: 138 pp.

Rubio, E.A., M.J. Pedraza & L.A. Zapata. 2005. Primer registro del tiburon perro Centroscyllium nigrum (Chondrichthyes: Squalidae) en aguas del Pacifico Colombiano. Gayana, 69(1): 113-117.

Rueda, M., H. Higuera-Salazar & J.A. Angulo-Sinisterra. 2004. Caracterizacion technologica de la flota de arrastre de camaron del Pacifico de Colombia. FAO, REBYC, Reduction of Environmental Impact from Tropical Shrimp Trawling, through the introduction of By-catch Reduction Technologies and Change of Management (EP/GLO/201/GEF), 28 pp.

Salazar, C., E. Castilla, J. Alarcon, I. Montoya, & G. Chacon. 2001. Pesca exploratoria y experimental con artes y metodos de pesca no tradicionales. Informe Interno IMARPE. Convenio de cooperacion Interinstitucional IMARPE-Pesquera Hayduk-Flota de Orpal.

Sancho, A. 2002. Informe de Peru. 96-112. In: A. Sancho, B. Ortiz-von Halle & N. Naranjo Cuvi (eds.). La pesca y el comercio del bacalao de profundidad Dissostichus eleginoides en America del Sur: una perspectiva regional. TRAFFIC America del Sur, Quito, 177 pp.

Sarda, F. 2000. Final report of the study: analysis of the Mediterranean (including North Africa) deep-sea shrimp fishery: catches, effort and economics. DG XIV, Project 97/0018: 1-162.

Sarda, F., J.B. Company & F. Maynou. 2003. Deep-sea shrimp Aristeus antennatus Risso 1816 in the Catanan Sea, a review and perspectives. J. Northw. Atl. Fish. Sci., 31: 127-136.

Sarda, F., A. Calafat, M.M. Flexas, A. Tselepides, M. Canals, M. Espino & A. Tursi. 2004. An introduction to Mediterranean deep-sea biology. Sci. Mar., 68 (Suppl. 3): 7-38.

Schweigger, E. 1943. La Bahia de Pisco. Tres estudios referentes a la oceanografia del Peru. Editorial Gil, Lima, pp. 5-97.

Serejo, C.S., P.S. Young, C.I. Cardoso, C. Tavares, C. Rodrigues & T.C. Almeida. 2007. Abundancia, diversidade e zonacao dos crustaceos no talude da costa central do Brasil (11[degrees]-22[degrees]S) coletados pelo Programa REVIZEE/Score Central: prospeccao pesqueira. In: Costa, P.A.S., G. Olavo & A.S. Martins (eds.). Biodiversidade da fauna marinha profunda na costa central brasileira. Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro. Serie Livros. Documentos REVIZEE/ SCORE-Central, pp. 133-162.

Servicio Nacional de Pesca (SERNAPESCA). 1978-1990. Anuarios estadisticos de pesca. Servicio Nacional de Pesca, Valparaiso.

Sparre P. & S.C. Venema. 1995. Introduccion a la evaluacion de recursos pesqueros tropicales. Pt. 1. Manual. FAO. Fish. Tech. Pap., 306.1, Rev. 2, Roma, 420 pp.

Stiles, M.L., E. Harrould-Kolieb, P. Faure, H. Ylitalo-Ward & M.F. Hirshfield. 2007. Deep sea trawl fisheries of the southeast US and the Gulf of Mexico: rock shrimp, royal red shrimp, Callico scallops. Washington, DC, Oceana, 18 pp.

Subsecretaria de Pesca (SUBPESCA). 2010. Cuota global anual de captura de camaron nailon (Heterocarpus reedi) entre la II y la VIII Region, ano 2011.

SUBPESCA, Inf. Tecnico (R. Pesq.), 115: 23 pp. Tavares, C.R. & C.S. Serejo. 2007. Taxonomy of Aristeidae (Dendrobranchiata: Penaeoidea) from the central coast of Brazil, collected by the REVIZEE program, between 19[degrees] and 22[degrees]S. Zootaxa, 1585: 1-44.

Tavares. M. 2002. Shrimps. In: K.E. Carpenter (ed.). The living marine resources of the western central Atlantic. Vol. I. FAO Species identification guide for fisheries purpose, Rome, pp. 251-291.

Thatje, S., R. Bacardit, M.C. Romero, F. Tapella & G.A. Lovrich. 2001. Description and key to the zoeal stages of the Campylonotidae (Decapoda, Caridea) from the Magellan region. J. Crust. Biol., 21(2): 492-505.

Torti, M.R. & E.E. Boschi. 1973. Nuevos aportes al conocimiento de los crustaceos decapodos Caridea del genero Campylonotus Bate, 1888. Physis, Secc. A, 32(84): 65-84.

Valentini, H. & P.R. Pezzuto, 2006. Analise das principais pescarias comerciais da regiao Sudeste-Sul do Brasil com base na producao controlada do periodo 1986-2004. In: C.L.D.B. Rossi Wongtchowski (ed.) Serie Documentos REVIZEE, Score-Sul. Instituto Oceanografico da USP, Sao Paulo, 56 pp.

Vazquez-Bader, A.R. & A. Gracia. 1994. Macroinvertebrados benticos de la plataforma continental del suroeste del Golfo de Mexico. Inst. Biol. Univ. Nal. Auton. Mexico. Publ. Esp., 12: 113 pp.

Velez, J., A. Kameya, C. Yamashiro, N. Lostaunau & O. Valiente. 1992. Investigacion del recurso potencial langostino rojo de profundidad a bordo del BIC "Fridtjof Nansen" (25 de abril-25 de mayo, 1990). Informe Inst. Mat. Peru-Callao, 104: 24 pp.

Vilchez, R., E. del Solar & M. Viacava. 1971. Informe del Crucero 7011 (III parte). Inst. Mar del Peru, Ser. Inf. Especiales, IM-78: 14 pp.

Villalobos-Rojas, F. 2009. Biologia reproductiva del camaron fidel, Solenocera agassizii (Decapoda: Solenoceridae) en el Pacifico de Costa Rica. Tesis Licenciatura en Biologia, Universidad de Costa Rica, 60 pp.

Villalobos-Rojas, F. & I.S. Wehrtmann (2011). Gonad development in the commercially exploited deepwater shrimp Solenocera agassizii (Decapoda: Solenoceridae) from Pacific Costa Rica, Central America. Fish. Res., 109: 150-156.

Wehrtmann, I.S. & E. Acuna. 2011. Squat lobster fisheries. In: G.C.B. Poore, S.T. Ahyong & J. Taylor (eds.). The biology of squat lobsters. Crusta-cean Issues ch. 11. CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne and CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 297-322.

Wehrtmann, I.S. & G. Andrade. 1998. Egg production in Heterocarpus reedi from northern Chile, with a comparison between iced and living females. Ophelia, 49(1): 71-82.

Wehrtmann, I.S. & A. Carvacho. 1997. New records and distribution ranges of shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda: Penaeoidea and Caridea) in Chilean waters. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 110: 49-57.

Wehrtmann, I.S. & V. Nielsen-Munoz. 2009. The deep-water fishery along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica, Central America. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 37(3): 543-554.

Wicksten, M.K. & J.M. Packard. 2005. A qualitative zoogeographic analysis of decapod crustaceans of the continental slopes and abyssal plain of the Gulf of Mexico. Deep-Sea Res. I, 52: 1745-1765.

Wosnitza-Mendo, C., J. Mendo, R. Guevara-Carrasco. 2007. Politicas de gestion para la reduccion de la capacidad excesiva del esfuerzo pesquero en Peru: el caso de la pesqueria de merluza. 343-372. In: M. Aguero (ed.). Capacidad de pesca y manejo pesquero en America Latina y el Caribe. FAO Doc. Tec. Pesca. 461: 403 pp.

Yany, G. 1974. Relacion longitud-peso y factor de condicion en el camaron nylon (Heterocarpus reedi, Bahamonde, 1955). Tesis, Depto. de Biologia, Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, 36 pp.

Yany, G. & C. Moreno. 1975. Contribucion al conocimiento el contenido gastrico y ciclo de madurez del bacalao de profundidad (Dissostichus eleginoides) de la zona de Valparaiso. Instituto de Fomento Pesquero--Centro de Investigaciones del Mar, Pont. Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, no publicado.

Yanez, E. 1973. Distribucion y abundancia relativa estacional de los recursos demersales capturados con redes camaroneras frente a las costas de Valparaiso (invierno-primavera, 1972). Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 5(4): 126-137.

Yanez, E. 1974. Distribucion y abundancia relativa estacional de los recursos disponibles a un arte de arrastre camaronero frente a la costa de Valparaiso (invierno y primavera 1972). Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 5(5): 125-137.

Yanez, E. & M.A. Barbieri. 1974. Distribucion y abundancia relativa de los recursos disponibles a un arte de arrastre camaronero frente a la costa de Valparaiso (invierno 1973). Invest. Mar., Valparaiso, 5(6): 138-156.

Ziller, S. 1993. Crecimiento, mortalidades y talla de primera captura del camaron nylon (Heterocarpus reedi), en la zona de Valparaiso. Tesis de Ingenieria Pesquera, Esc. Ciencias del Mar, Univ. Catolica Valparaiso, 132 pp.

Zilleruelo, M. & D. Parraga. 2009. Investigacion situacion pesquerias crustaceos demersales 2009 Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, Valparaiso, 34 pp.

Received: 15 March 2011; Accepted: 16 March 2012

Ingo S. Wehrtmann (1), Patricio M. Arana (2), Edward Barriga (3), Adolfo Gracia (4) & Paulo Ricardo Pezzuto (5)

(1) Unidad de Investigacion Pesquera y Acuicultura (UNIP), Centro de Investigacion en Ciencias Marinas y Limnologia (CIMAR), Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica

(2) Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile

(3) Instituto del Mar del Peru, Callao, Peru

(4) Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, DF, Mexico

(5) Universidade do Vale do Itajai, Itajai, SC, Brasil

Corresponding author: Ingo S. Wehrtmann (ingowehrtmann@gmx.de)
Table 1. Size (carapace length, SD, standard deviation)
of deep-water shrimps of the Gulf of Mexico.

Tabla 1. Tamano (longitud del cefalotorax, SD, desviacion
estandar) de camarones de aguas profundad en el golfo de
Mexico.

Species          Minimum    Average            Maximum    N
                  size     [+ or -]            size
                              SD

Aristaeomorpha    31.5     49.8 [+ or -] 7     84.0     4618
  foliacea
Aristaeopsis      28.0     58.7 [+ or -] 14    86.4     1644
  edwardsiana
Pleoticus         25.0     43.8 [+ or -] 14    78.0     1200
  robustus
Aristeus          17.9     34.7 [+ or -] 13    64.3     688
  antillensis
Penaeopsis        17.3     23.8 [+ or -] 7     46.3     1552
  serrata
Parapenaeus       11.7     22.5 [+ or -] 4     30.4     188
  americanus

Table 2. Nylon shrimp (Heterocarpus reedi) landings
and annual global quota in Chile

Tabla 2. Desembarque y cuota global anual de camaron
nailon (Heterocarpus reedi) en Chile

Year         Catch landings (ton)       Annual
                                        quota
                                        (ton)

       Artisanal   Industrial   Total

1998        764        6,537    7,301   8,300
1999      1,186        6,765    7,951   7,900
2000      1,220        4,228    5,448   5,000
2001      1,006        3,856    4,862   5,000
2002        948        1,949    2,897   4,800
2003      1,000        2,589    3,589   4,800
2004        943        2,720    3,663   4,770
2005        544        3,196    3,740   5,130
2006        713        3,617    4,330   5,130
2007        703        3,637    4,340   5,130
2008        797        3,760    4,557   5,200
2009        847        3,647    4,494   5,200
2010        900        3,450    4,350   5,500
2011                                    5,200

Source of information: SERNAPESCA

Table 3. Main operational variables of the direct assessment cruises
for nylon shrimp (Heterocarpus reedi) in Chile (1998-2006).

Tabla 3. Principales variables operacionales en los cruceros de
evaluacion directa de camaron nailon (Heterocarpus reedi) en Chile
(1998-2006).

Year   Institution     Ship                          Haul    Period

1998   UEDC-UCN        PAM: Antares, Linda Kay        282    Ago-Dic
1999   UCN             PAM: Eicomar, Los Vilos II     263    Jul-Sep
2000   PUCV-IFOP-UCN   PAM: Cachagua I, Mancora I,    792    Jun-Jul
                       Sunnan II, Tiberiades LM:
                       Isabel S
2001   UCN-UdeC        PAM: Foche, Nisshin Maru       352    Jun-Jul
                       III LM: Pionero
2002   PUCV-IFOP       PAM: Crusoe I, Foche,        1.169    Ago-Oct
                       Lennox, Pionero LM:
                       Isabel S
2003   PUCV-IFOP       PAM: Crusoe I, Foche LM:       493    Ago-Sep
                       Isabel S
2004   PUCV-IFOP       PAM: Crusoe I, Lonquimay       585    Jul-Sep
                       LM: Isabel S
2005   PUCV-IFOP       PAM: Foche, Lonquimay,         413    Jul-Ago
                       Don Stefan
2006   UCN-IFOP-UdeC   PAM: Foche LM: Oriente         386    Oct-Dic
2008   UCN-UdeC        PAM: Foche LM: Isabel S        570    Jun-Dic

Year   Catch       Area       Biomass   Reference
       (ton)   ([km.sup.2])    (ton)

1998      5          9.547     9.402    Roa et al. (1999)
1999      5         11.723    20.236    Acuna et al. (2000b)
2000     23          6.088    21.415    ECM (2000b)
2001     13          5.898    21.000    Acuna et al. (2002)
2002     57          5.987    17.014    Arana et al. (2003 a)
2003     46          3.690    22.375    Arana et al. (2004)
2004     32          3.189    21.470    Arana et al. (2005)
2005     65          4.173    27.620    Arana et al. (2006)
2006     86          3.740    37.111    Acuna et al. (2007b)
2008   n.d.          3.740    28.772    Acuna et al. (2009)

ECM: Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, UDEC: Universidad de Concepcion,
PUCV: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, UCN: Universidad
Catolica del Norte, IFOP: Instituto de Fomento Pesquero. PAM: High
seas fishing vessel, LM: Motor boat.

Table 4. Landing statistics of the deep-water shrimps in Brazil,
between 2002 and 2009. All values in kg.

Tabla 4. Desembarque de camarones de aguas profundas en Brasil,
entre 2002 y 2009. Todos los valores estan expresados en kg.

Year                      Species                      Total

        Aristaeopsis   Aristaeomorpha    Aristaeus
        edwardsiana       foliacea      antillensis

2002         13.021                -             -     13.021
2003         58.928            4.585           475     63.988
2004         81.585           14.861         5.489    101.935
2005        182.633           42.568        15.828    241.029
2006         99.325           51.756         5.365    156.446
2007         40.231            8.896           774     49.901
2008         53.021           21.604           434     75.059
2009         13.703            3.831           172     17.706
Total       542.447          148.101        28.537    719.085

Source of information: Grupo de Estudos Pesqueiros (Universidade
do Vale do Itajai)

Table 5. General information and current fishery status of the
main deep-water shrimp species around Latin America. "Geographic
distribution" indicates the known geographic distribution of the
species in Latin America, and "Country" refers to the country where
a commercial fishery exists or not; the term "unknown" means that it
is unclear if this fishery is still active. References concerning
bathymetric and geographic distribution of the species are mentioned
in the text; otherwise they are indicated at the end of the table.

Tabla 5. Informacion general y situacion de las principales especies
de camarones alrededor de America Latina. La "Distribucion geografica"
indica el area conocida en que se distribuye la especie en America
Latina, y "Pais" se refiere al pais donde se desarrolla o no la
pesqueria comercial; el termino "desconocido" significa que no esta
claro si la pesqueria es todavia activa. La referencia respecto a la
batimetria y distribucion geografica de las especies esta mencionada
en el texto; en caso contrario, esta senalada al final de la tabla.

Infraorden   Family             Species             Depth
                                                  range (m)

Penaeoidea   Aristeidae         Aristaeomorpha     250-1300
                                foliacea
                                Aristaeopsis       274-1850
                                edwardsiana
                                Aristeus           200-1144
                                antillensis
             Benthesicymidae    Benthesicymus      600-1500
             Penaeidae          tanneri
                                Parapenaeus        190-412
                                americanus
                                Penaeopsis         120-640
                                serrata
                                Haliporoides     240-1865 (1)
                                diomedeae
             Solenoceridae      Pleoticus          180-730
                                robustus
                                Solenocera        31-622 (2)
                                acuminata
                                Solenocera          16-350
                                agassizii
Caridea      Campylonotidae     Campylonotus       35-1000
             Nematocarcinidae   semistriatus
                                Nematocarcinus   190-1860 (3)
                                agassizzii
                                Heterocarpus       760-1240
                                affinis
                                Heterocarpus       695-800
                                hostilis
             Pandalidae         Heterocarpus       155-800
                                reedi
                                Heterocarpus       73-1454
                                vicarius
             Pasiphaeidae       Pasiphaea        509-1019 (5)
                                magna

Infraorden   Family             Geographic distribution

Penaeoidea   Aristeidae         Gulf of Mexico, and in the
                                Caribbean Sea to Brazil
                                Grand Bank south to Brazil
                                including the Gulf of Mexico
                                and Caribbean Sea
                                Florida to Brazil, including
                                the Gulf of Mexico and the
                                Caribbean Sea
             Benthesicymidae    Gulf of California, Panama,
             Penaeidae          Colombia, Galapagos Islands,
                                Ecuador and Peru
                                Gulf of Mexico to Uruguay
                                Amphi-Atlantic distribution
                                Gulf of Panama to Chiloe
                                Island in Chile
             Solenoceridae      Gulf of Mexico and the
                                Caribbean Sea to French
                                Guiana
                                Caribbean Sea, British
                                Honduras to Venezuela;
                                Gulf of Paria to French
                                Guiana (2)
                                Nicaragua to Peru
Caridea      Campylonotidae     Argentina, Chile, Peru
             Nematocarcinidae
                                Sinaloa, Mexico, to Peru,
                                Cocos, Malpelo and Galapagos
                                Islands (4)
                                Gulf of California (Mexico)
                                to Peru
                                Gulf of Panama to Isla del
                                Coco in Peru
             Pandalidae         central-northern to central-
                                southern Chile, Peru
                                Gulf of California (Mexico)
                                to Peru
             Pasiphaeidae       From Oregon (USA) to Panama,
                                Peru and Chile (5)

Infraorden   Family             Country         Commercial
                                                 fishery

Penaeoidea   Aristeidae         Mexico              no
                                Brazil          no longer
                                Mexico              no
                                Brazil          no longer
                                French Guiana    unknown
                                Mexico              no
                                Brazil          no longer
             Benthesicymidae    Peru                no
             Penaeidae          Mexico              no
                                Mexico              no
                                Chile              yes
                                Peru                no
             Solenoceridae      Mexico              no
                                French Guiana    unknown
                                Costa Rica         yes
                                Colombia           yes
Caridea      Campylonotidae     Chile              yes
             Nematocarcinidae   Peru                no
                                Costa Rica         yes
                                Peru                no
                                Colombia         unknown
             Pandalidae         Chile              yes
                                Costa Rica         yes
                                Colombia         unknown
                                Peru                no
             Pasiphaeidae       Peru                no

References: (1) Hendrickx (1995); (2) Perez Farfante & Bullis (1973);
(3) Burukovsky (2001); (4) Wicksten & Hendrickx (2003); (5) Wehrtmann
& Carvacho (1997)
COPYRIGHT 2012 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:articulo en ingles
Author:Wehrtmann, Ingo S.; Arana, Patricio M.; Barriga, Edward; Gracia, Adolfo; Pezzuto, Paulo Ricardo
Publication:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Date:Nov 1, 2012
Words:21881
Previous Article:Artemia (Crustacea, Anostraca) in Chile: a review of basic and applied biology/Artemia (Crustacea, Anostraca) en Chile: revision de la biologia...
Next Article:Effect of reducing the feeding frequency on the survival, growth, conversion, and feeding behavior of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (Linnaeus,...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters