Printer Friendly

Dear EarthTalk: it is true that the carcasses of whales that wash up on shore are considered dangerous to humans because of the amount of toxins and chemicals in their blubber?

Dear EarthTalk: It is true that the carcasses of whales that wash up on shore are considered dangerous to humans because of the amount of toxins and chemicals in their blubber? --Michael O'Loughlin, Tigard, OR

Whether wildlife officials in a given region consider a dead beached whale a biohazard or not is local decision, but nevertheless experts agree that only trained professionals should go anywhere near a dead wild animal to prevent the spread of bacterial infection alone, no matter whether any industrial pollutants might be oozing out. But regardless, it is true that some types of whales, given their spot at the top of the marine food chain, do harbor chemical pollution in their fatty tissue and organs.

Researchers have found, for instance, that PCBs, dangerous toxins notorious for polluting New York's Hudson River and long banned in the U.S. are present in the blubber of beluga and orca whales, among others, in amounts--some 80 parts per million--that could kill a person. DDT, a pesticide banned in 1972 in the U.S. for wreaking havoc on bird and other wildlife populations, also still shows up in measurable amounts in whale blubber around the world.

Beyond such well-known pollutants, newer ones are starting to show up in large amounts in the carcasses of beached whales and other top marine predators. Today biologists are most worried about the marked increase in flame retardants (PBDEs) and stain repellents (PFOS) in dead marine mammals. Flame retardants are particularly troublesome because they "seem to travel over long distances in the atmosphere, and some studies have shown that they can be toxic to the immune system and can affect neurobehavioral development," according to a recent report by the Arctic Council, a multilateral international body in charge of overseeing Arctic law and development. The report also noted that PFOS does "not seem to break down under any circumstances," meaning it is passed up the food chain to whales and other top predators, and then in some cases consumed by humans, especially indigenous Arctic people still hunting marine animals as part of their subsistent lifestyles.

According to the Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS), whales aren't the only wild animals carrying around large amounts of toxic chemicals. Bottlenose dolphins, manatees, polar bears, seals, sea lions and other marine wildlife also have PCBs, DDT, PBDEs, PFOS and the other pollutants in their tissues and bloodstreams. "The large-scale die-off of bottlenose dolphins along the mid-Atlantic coast of the United States in the mid-1980s may have been the direct or indirect result of increasing levels of toxic waste from industrial sources," HSUS reports, adding that "such pollutants can depress the immune system of marine mammals, making the animals susceptible to diseases they could normally fight off." Another example: Polar bears in Norway have been exhibiting serious congenital abnormalities; HSUS blames exposure to toxic pollutants in the bears' otherwise pristine environment.

Environmental and health experts worry about such contamination because many of the chemicals in question are known "endocrine disruptors," meaning they can impair reproduction in both wildlife and humans by mimicking or altering natural hormonal activity. Such chemicals can also cause neurological problems and developmental or skeletal abnormalities.

CONTACTS: Arctic Council,; HSUS,

GOT AN ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTION? Send it to: EarthTalk, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; submit it at:, or e-mail: Read past columns at:
COPYRIGHT 2008 Earth Action Network, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:EARTH TALK: From the Editors of E/The Environmental Magazine
Author:O'Loughlin, Michael
Publication:EarthTalk: Questions & Answers About Our Environment. A Weekly Column
Date:Apr 13, 2008
Previous Article:Dear EarthTalk: What makes those so-called "new urbanism" housing developments popping up around the U.S. more environmentally friendly than regular...
Next Article:Dear EarthTalk: I've found environmentally friendly shoes for myself, but have had trouble finding similar shoes for my kids. Are they out there?

Related Articles
Whale watch: pursued to the brink of extinction, cetaceans fight for survival against man-made odds.
Whale hunters: Men risked their lives for the chance of adventure. (American history).
Kings of the deep: Gray and humpback whales vacation on Mexico's Pacific coast, to the delight of tourists and oceanographers alike. (Living in...
Natural or synthetic? Test reveals origin of chemicals in blubber.
Whale falls: it's not just a carcass, it's dinner.
Painting perils & urban greenbelts.
Dear EarthTalk: What is the status of sharks around the world?
Blown-up whale.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters