Printer Friendly

Dave Brat on church and state.

June 18, 2014

God And CountryDave Brat--who recently upset Eric Cantor in a Virginia congressional primary--says he is heavily influenced by free-market thinkers, including Adam Smith, Milton Friedman, F. A. Hayek, and (to a lesser degree) Ayn Rand. Unlike many Republicans, Brat does not merely pay lip service to free markets; he substantially understands what free markets are and substantially supports them.

More encouraging, a paper that Brat wrote in 2011 indicates that he endorses the separation of church and state. (1) Here is the key excerpt:
There is obviously a tremendous gulf between biblical statements made
to faith communities and their direct application to secular law today.
Seminaries go out of their way to show the complexities of exegesis,
but when it comes to hot-button issues such as usury, rationality often
flies out the window. Can Christians force others to follow their
ethical teachings on social issues? Note that consistency is lacking on
all sides of this issue. The political Right likes to champion
individual rights and individual liberty, but it has also worked to
enforce morality in relation to abortion, gambling, and homosexuality.
The Left likes to think of itself as the bulwark of progressive liberal
individualism, and yet it seeks to progressively coerce others to fund
every social program under the sun via majority rule. Houston, we have
a problem. Coercion is on the rise. What is the root word for
liberalism? (Answer: Liberty)


This is heartening. Brat here indicates that he opposes government forcing people on matters of abortion, gambling, and homosexuality (and presumably like matters). It would be great to see a Republican in Brat's position hold to such views.

There is, however, some suggestion that he might not. Brat's website states, "Dave will protect the rights of the unborn." (2) This indicates, at a minimum, that Brat believes that the "unborn" have rights, but whether he wants government to protect those "rights" (and, if so, how), is another question. Brat's website also states, "Human life is sacred, as proclaimed by our founding documents, and I will always support laws that protect life." (3) Although this statement does not specifically mention abortion, it seems to be code for support of antiabortion laws.

A conservative candidate's position on abortion is a key indicator of his views on the separation or integration of church and state. Those who claim that embryos and fetuses have rights do not understand what rights are or where they come from; therefore, they cannot be counted on to uphold rights in other areas, even if they claim they will. (For a discussion of rights regarding abortion, see "The Assault on Abortion Rights Undermines All Our Liberties.") (4)

To the degree that Brat and other candidates endorse the separation of economy and state (i.e., free markets) and the separation of church and state, they deserve support from advocates of liberty. On this count, Brat appears to be one of the best candidates Americans have seen in many years. Time will tell.

Endnotes

(1.) David Brat, "God and Advanced Mammon--Can Theological Types Handle Usury and Capitalism?," Interpretation, 2011, http://int.sagepub.com/content/65/2/168.abstract.

(2.) Dave Brat, "Protecting Values," DaveBrat.com, http://davebrat.com/protecting-values/ (accessed June 18, 2014).

(3.) See Dave Brat, "Issues," DaveBrat.com, http://davebrat.com/issues/ (accessed June 12, 2014).

(4.) Diana Hsieh and Ari Armstrong, "The Assault on Abortion Rights Undermines All Our Tiberties," The Objective Standard, Winter 2011-12, vol. 6, no. 4, http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2011-winter/abortion-rights/. See also Craig Biddle, "Ayn Rand's Theory of Rights: The Moral Foundation of a Free Society," The Objective Standard, Fall 2011, vol. 6, no. 3, http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2011-fall/ayn-rand-theory-rights/
COPYRIGHT 2014 Glen Allen Press, LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:From TOS Blog
Author:Armstrong, Ari
Publication:The Objective Standard
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 22, 2014
Words:617
Previous Article:Ayn Rand was right: Cats are objectively valuable.
Next Article:Economists' "Subjective Value" and Ayn Rand's objective value reconciled.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters