Printer Friendly


Byline: Abdul Khaliq Alvi, Zahid Hussain, Muhammad Tahir and Muhammad Abubakar Siddque Gondal


The purpose of this research is to check the effect of management leadership and work life balance on employee job engagement. Current research has suggested the two hypotheses to check the nature and strength of the relationships. This study is quantitative in nature. For this purpose, primary data was collected with the help of structured questionnaire. Questionnaire was composed of 38items. SPSS-18and AMOS was used for analyze the data. The factor loading of 37 statements are according to the standards and factor loading of one statement was below the standard. This statement was excluded from further data analysis. Both of proposed hypotheses are accepted.

Results confirmed that management leadership is good predictor of employee job engagement as compare to work life balance. In future researches the impact of employee job engagement will be checked on some consequences like OCB, job turnover, employee performance. For more generalizing the results, this study will also held on other sectors like textile sector, hotel industry, education sector etc.

Keywords: Work Life Balance (WLB), Management Leadership, Employee Job Engagement, Banking Sector, Pakistan


In recent times, there has been a wide focus of researchers on the term of employee engagement and researchers are paying more attention on the roles of employee engagement for organizational performance and for getting competitive edge [1]. Furthermore, previous studies have proposed that employee engagement is considered as the predictor of employee turnover intentions, work performance, financial capabilities, and customer satisfaction [2]. Researcher [3] describes the noteworthy role of employee engagement but also mention this aspect as the missing link" that is one of the significant dimension of organizational success. Employee engagement is mentioned as a new and emerging area" of 21st century [4]. Thus, employee engagement is visualized as the prominent factor for the success of organizations. However there is a huge gap of empirical studies regarding employee engagement.

But despite of this reality, the investigations of employee engagement are conducted from consulting firms like Tower Perrin and Gallup. But firms of other industries are lacked behind about empirical researches regarding employee engagement. That's why [4] has argued that there is a surprising dearth of research on employee engagement in the academic literature". Researchers [5] also concluded that there has been surprisingly little academic and empirical studies on one of most popular concept i.e. employee engagement" Furthermore, Researcher [4] proposed that there had been little investigation on the dimensions and predictors of the term employee engagement. Despite of the critical factor of the organizational performance, employee engagement was not investigated extensively [6]. And [6] and [2] also commented that there was intensive disengagement among the workers of organizations of modern age.

However, researchers have concluded that employee engagement is supportive factor to predict the employee performance, success of the organizations and financial outcomes [2,3,7,5]. Work life balance is important variable which is consider as new area of research. In previous two decades researchers are done number of researches on this variable and they have focused on this variable due to economic crises, due to increasing business rivalry and organizational restructuring [8,9]. For good commitment level of employees and performance organizations are paid much attention on concept of work life balance [10;11;12]. It is seemed that there is lot of pressure on employees regarding long hours and inflexible working timetables [13].Researches proposed that psychological and physical well-being of employees is very much disturbed due to imbalance of working activities and non-working activities [13; 14; 15; 16; 17].

A study of UK [18] described that the employees who did their extra work in their houses were reported as main sources of emotional exhaustion and stress. And employees were stated that their personal life is negatively affected by imbalance in work life balance and caused in serious health problems [18].It is concluded that work life balance is important issues for employees and organizations. This study is also considered the new emerging variable management leadership as independent variable. Current research is design to check the impact of work life balance and management leadership on employee job engagement.

2- LITERATURE REVIEW Employee Job Engagement

Researcher [20] describes the term employee engagement on the basis of researcher's [19] role behavior speculation. This theory proposes that employee attitudes are formed by the demands and regulations of other employees [20]. Researcher [10] also asserts that employees are likely to attach themselves according to their roles or improving their individual personality with these roles. Researcher [10]defines the term employee engagement as the harnessing of organizational members themselves to their work roles; in engagement, people employ and express themselves physically, cognitively, and emotionally during role performances"[10]. He also concludes that harnessing" is assorted according to employee's three kinds of states. These states are termed as meaningfulness, safety, and availability. Engagement is an intense connection between the self and the work role where people fully express themselves physically, cognitively and emotionally at work [10].

Work-life balance

According to [21] Work-life balance (WLB) is defined as the extent to which an individual is equally engaged in -and equally satisfied with - his or her work role and family role". Persons with high level of work-life balance will impart task orientation, logical argument and commitment for tasks allotted to them. Workers with balanced WLB performed the proper and balanced engagement during their personal life and in organizational work [22]. Researchers [23] concluded that implementation of family- friendly arrangements can enhance organizational efficiency. These researchers also proved the optimistic relation between workers performance and rate of efficiency. And these things can create family friendly rules in the organization [23]. Lot of researches also supported the execution of WLB rules in different kinds of organizations and in the different part of the country [21, 25,26].

Work life balance is the pa rt of organizational environment [27]. Researches on WLB have also been conducted in the education sector. [28], conducted his study on Higher Education firms HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) and UCEA (Universities and Colleges Employers Association in 2003) and described the valuable rules regarding WLB. Researchers [28], describes the relation of WLB with job pressure and burnout. [30] also confirm that turnover of employees is due to extra working hours. These researchers suggest that disagreement among employment and family is effected or restrained through the worker's assistance with organizational customs or by supervisors. Different researchers prove that WLB has greater impact on job fulfillment and loyalty and these can reduce the turnover of the employees [29,30]. Reseacher [31] describes the diverse viewpoint regarding the WLB.

Researhers [31] illustrate the term presenteeism" as an overwhelming need to put in more hours or, at the very least, appear to be working ver y long hours". These researchers conclude the three facts are closely related with presenteeism. (1) Managers must offer moral help and coaching to the workers of the organization. (2) Managers must be seen, their organization as like their own business. (3) For better results, it is necessary for the managers spend lots of time in their organization. Management Leadership Management leadership referred as leaders set service standards by their own behaviors' and management style" [32].

Different studies prove that management leadership is critical for organizations and there is positive association among management leadership and employee's job commitment [33]. Researchers [34] concluded that management leadership was given much importance by different previous scientists. According to Researchers [35,36], good managers are closely linked with the wants and desires of the subordinates. They always try to support them in all conditions. These helpful manners of managers can cause employee's job satisfaction [37]. Managers set good work atmosphere with the help of their management leadership [32]. That's why leadership style is a significant constituent for generating and continuing an efficient job orientation [34]. But, different researchers conclude that there is not significant association between leadership behavior and worker satisfaction [38,39].


Workers with balanced WLB performed the proper and positive level of engagement during their personal life and in organizational work [40]. Different studies prove that management leadership is critical for organizations and there is positive association among leadership actions and employee's job commitment [33]. There are some further critical variables which are predictors of employee engagement. For example, human resource practices might have impact on employee engagement [4]. Management leadership is one of the important HR practices. On the basis of avove discussion, current study has proposed the following hypothesis.

H1: The influence of management leadership on employee job engagement is positive.

H2: There is positive influence of work life balance on employee job engagement.


Validity of scale and reliability of data

Table No1: Factor Analysis

Item Statement###Factor###Cronbach










ML4###.969###0. .613









###Item Statement###Factor###Cronbach












Data was collected with the help of structured questionnaire. Simple random sampling technique was used. Respondents for this study were officer level employees of banking sector. Overall 423 questionnaires were distributed. 322 questionnaires were retrieved with the response rate of 76%; out of received 312 questionnaires were selected for final analyses, rest were not complete. This study used the scale of 28statements. This scale is developed with the help of previous articles published in the same area of research. Validity of the scale is checked with the help of factor loading. Factor loading of all 27 items included in the instrument was more than 0.50. Factor loading of only one statement of WLB is less than 0.50.This statement is excluded from the final analysis .Reliability of data is being checked with the help Cronbach alpha. SPSS 16 is making use for performing the test. Data is reliable if the value of crown batch alpha is more than 0.50 [26].

Cronbach alpha of all the instruments is more than 0.605 which indicates that data is reliable and is used for further analysis.

5-RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Correlation Analysis

Table No2

Employ Eng###WLB###ML

Employ Eng###1###.232###.305



Table 2 describes that correlation between employee job engagement, management leadership and work life balance. Employee job engagement, management leadership and work life balance are positively correlated with each other's. Correlation between work life balance and management leadership is strong as compare to the correlation between employee job engagement and work life balance.

Tables No 3 describes the regression analyses about current study. The relationship and effect of independent variable on dependent variable is described with the help of regression analysis. The value of R Square describes the extent of impact that independent variable have on dependent variables.

Regression Analysis

Table No.3





R Square###.263



This value is accepted when it is greater than 25%. P-value illustrates the actual level of relationship. In the regression analysis if the value of P is less than 0.05, 0.01 or 0.10, then the hypothesis is accepted. These are three levels for the acceptance of the hypothesis. The value of F describes the extent of relationship between dependent and independent variables. Greater the value of F, greater will be the association among variables. The value of AY describes the level of impact of independent variable on dependent variables. The above table No.3 shows the relationship of work life balance and management leadership with employee job engagement. For the relationship of work life balance and employee job engagement the value of AY = 0.081 and value of p=0.059 i.e. less than 0.10. This describe that work life balance has significant positive effect on employee job engagement. It implies that work life balance may cause 8.1 % variation in employee job engagement.

For the relationship of management leadership and employee job engagement the value of AY = 0.183 and value of p=0.000 i.e. less than 0.01. This describe that management leadership has significant positive effect on employee job engagement. It implies that work life balance may cause 18.3 % variation in employee job engagement.

This table also gives the values of t which are non-zero.


Findings of current study implies that management leadership plays significant role in improving the level of employee job engagement banking sector . On the other hand work life balance has positive significant impact but extant of this relationship is less than as compare to the relationship of management leadership and employee job engagement. This study suggests that top management of banking sector can increase the level of job engagement by applying the concept of management leadership and work life balance. This can result in guarantee loyal and committed employees in banking sector and in a result employee turnover is reduced. Moreover, for applying these concepts efficiency of the organizations and productivity will be increased. In future studies, impact of employee job engagement with some outcome variables like OCB , employee commitment employee productivity will be checked.


1- S. Kular, M.Gatenby, C.Rees, E. Soan, Tru, Employee engagement: a literature review. Working paper Series 19, Kingston Business School, Kingston upon Thame, 2008.

2- B. L. Rich, Job engagement: Construct validation and relationships with job satisfaction, job involvement, and instrinsic motivation . Unpublished Doctoral, University of Florida, 2006 .

3- R. Baumruk, The missing link: the role of employee engagement in business success. Workspan,47(1) , 48- 52, 2004.

4- A. M. Saks, Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7) , 600-619, 2006.

5- D. Robinson, S.Perryman, S.Hayday, The drivers of Employee Engagement. Bridgeton UK: Institute for Development Studies Mantell Building Falmer, 2004.

6- S. Bates, Getting engaged. HR Magazine, 49(2) , 44- 51, 2004.

7- J. K. Harter, F. L. Schmidt, T. L. Hayes, Business-unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta- analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2) , 268- 79, 2002.

8- F Green, It's been a hard day's nig ht: the concentratio n and intensificatio n of wor k in late twentieth -centur y Britain, British Journal of Industrial Relation s , 39(1). 53-80,2001.

9- N. Millward, A. Br yso n, J. Forth, All Change at Work British E mplo yment Relatio ns 1980-1998, As Portrayed B y T he Workplace I nd ustrial Relatio ns Survey Series, Routledge, London, 2000.

10- D. Perrons, T he new econo my and the work -life balance: co nceptual explorations and a case stud y o f new media",Gender, Wo rk and Organiza tion , 10, 65-93, 2003,

11- M.White, S. Hill, P. McGover n, C. Mills, D. Smeato n, High-per for mance' management practices, work ing ho urs and wor k -life balance ,British Journal o f Industrial Rela tions, 41(1)175-95, 2003.

12- Department o f T rade and Ind ustr y, Britain's wor ker s crave more time with friend s in 2004, available at: http :// k - lifebalance/press_2704a.html , 2004

13- K, Sparks, , C Cooper Fried, A. Shiro m, T he effects o f ho urs of wor k on health: a meta - analytic revie w,Journal of Occupational and Organiza tional P sycholog y , Vol. 70(2), 391-408, 1997.

14- M. Frone, M. Russell, L.M. Cooper, Relation o f wor k-family conflict to health o utco mes: a fo ur - year longitudinal stud y of emplo yed parents , Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(1), 325-35.

15- T ho mas, L.T . and Ganster , D.C. (1995), I mpact of family-supportive work variables on wor k - family co nflict and strain: a control perspective",Jo urnal o f Ap plied Psycho logy, Vol. 80, pp. 6 -15

16- Martens, M.F.J., Nijhuis, F.J.N., Van Boxtel, M.P.J. and Knottnerus, J.A. (1999), Flexib le wor k sched ules and mental and physical health: a stud y o f a wor king p opulation with non - traditio nal working ho urs",Jo urnal o f Organizatio nal Behavior, Vol. 20, pp. 35 -46.

17- Felstead, A., Jewso n, N., Phizacklea, A. and Walter, S. (2002), Opp ortunities to wor k at ho me in the co ntext o f wor k -life balance",Human Resource Management Journal, Vo l. 12, pp. 54 - 76

18- Hyman, J., Baldr y, C., Scho larios, D. and Bunzel, D. (2003), Work -life imb alance in the new ser vice sector eco no my",British Jour nal o f Industr ial Relat io ns, Vol. 4 1, pp. 215 -39.

19- Goffman E., E nco unter s: T wo studies in the sociolo gy o f interactio n, I ndianapolis, I N:Bobbs - Merrill, 1961.

20- Kahn A. W., Psychological co nditions o f personal engagement and d isengagement at work, . Academy o f Management J our nal, 33 , 692 - 724, 1990.

21- Ro wley, G., and Purcell, K., As coo ks go, she went': is labour churn inevitable Inter national Jour nal of Ho spitality Management 20 (1), 163 -85,2001.

22- 13- Cullen, J., McLaughlin, A., What drives the persistence o f p resenteeism as a managerial value in hotels Obser vations noted d uring an Irish work -life balance research project. Inter national Jour nal of Hosp itality Management, 25 (3), 510-16, 2006.

23- 14- Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., Weitzman, M., Finding an E xtr a Day a Week: T he Positive I nfluence o f Perceived Job Flexibility o n Work and Family Life Balance . Family Relations, 50 (14) , 49 -58,2001.

24- 15- Rich, L. B., Job engagement: Constr uct validatio n and relat io nships with job satisfactio n, job involvement, and instrinsic motivatio n. Unpub lished Doctoral, Univer sity o f Florida,2006 .

25- 16- Kahn, A. W., P sychological conditio ns o f personal engagement and disengagement at wor k. . Academy o f Man agement Jour nal, 33 (3), 692 -724,1990.

26- Nunnally J. C. Psycho metric theor y, McGraw - Hill, 1978.

27- Scott, J. Flexible emplo yment optio ns: audit of current practice and example of bestpractice in the HE sector.

28- HEFCE Flexible E mplo yment Op tio ns Project,2002.

29- 9- Mulvaney, R., O'Neill, J., Cleverland, J., Crou., A model of wor k-family d ynamics o hotel manager s. Annals of T ourism Research 34 (1) , 66 -87,2006.

30- O Karatepe, O Uludag, Co nflict, exhaustio n and motivatio n: a stud y o f fro ntline emplo yees in Northern Cypr us hotels, International Jou rnal of Hospitality Management, 26 (3), 645-65,2007.

31- K. Namasivayam, X. Zhao, An investigatio n of the moderating effect s of organizational co mmitment on the r elatio nships between wor k-family co nflict and job satisfactio n amo ng ho spitality emplo yees in I ndia, Tourism Management , 28 (5) , 1212 -1223,2007.

32- R. S. Lytle, P. W. Hom, M. P. Mokwa, SEROR: A managerial measure of organisational service- orientation. Journal of Retailing 74(4) , 455489, 1998.

33- T. R. Hinkin, J. B. Tracey, Transformational leadership in the hospitality industry, Hospitality Research Journal 18(1) , 4964, 1994.

34- C. C. Changa, C. M. Chiub, C. A. Chena, The effect of TQM practices on employee satisfaction and loyalty in Government. Total Quality Management, 21(12) , 12991314, 2010.

35- A. H. Church, Linking leadership behaviours to service performance: Do managers make a difference Managing Service Quality 5(6) , 2631, 1995.

36- R. Hallowell, L. A. Schlesinger, , J Zornitsky, Internal service quality, customer and job satisfaction: Linkages and implications for management . Human Resource Planning 19(2) , 2030, 1996.

37- R. Netemeyer, J. Boles, D. Mckee, R. Mcmurrian, An investigation into the antecedents of organisational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context. Journal of Marketing, 61 , 8598, 1997.

38- H. K. Downey, J. E. Sheridan, J. W. Slocum, Analysis of relationships among leader behavior, subordinate job performance and satisfaction: A path-goal approach. Academy of. Management Journal, 18 , 253262, 1975.

39- R. Hampton, A. J. Dubinsky, S. A. Skinner, A model of sales supervisor leadership behavior and retail salespeople's job-related outcomes. Academy of Marketing Science 14(3) , 3343, 1986.

40- V. Meghna, D. L. Juliana, J. C. Wendy, Doing more with less An analysis of work life balance among layoff survivors. Career Development International 12(5) , 463-480, 2007.
COPYRIGHT 2015 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Science International
Article Type:Report
Date:Aug 31, 2015

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters