Printer Friendly

DOD Problem Disbursements: Long-standing Accounting Weaknesses Result in Inaccurate Records and Substantial Write-offs.

GAO-05-521 June 2, 2005

Over the years, the Department of Defense (DOD) has recorded billions of dollars of disbursements and collections in suspense accounts because the proper appropriation accounts could not be identified and charged. DOD has also been unable to resolve discrepancies between its and Treasury's records of checks issued by DOD. Because documentation that would allow for resolution of these payment recording problems could not be found after so many years, DOD requested and received legislative authority to write off certain aged suspense transactions and check payment differences. The conference report (H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 107-772) that accompanied the legislation (Pub. L. No. 107-314) required GAO to review and report on DOD's use of this write-off authority.

After decades of financial management and accounting weaknesses, information related to aged disbursement and collection activity was so inadequate that DOD was unable to determine the true value of the write-offs. While DOD records show that an absolute value of $35 billion or a net value of $629 million of suspense amounts and check payment differences were written off, the reported amounts are not reliable. Many of the write-offs represented transactions that had already been netted together (i.e., positive amounts offsetting negative amounts) at lower level accounting sites before they were recorded in the suspense accounts. This netting or summarizing of transactions misstated the total value of the write-offs and made it impossible for DOD to locate the support needed to identify what appropriations may have been under- or overcharged or determine whether individual transactions were valid. In particular, DOD could not determine whether any of the write-off amounts, had they been charged to the proper appropriation, would have caused an Antideficiency Act violation. It is important that DOD accurately and promptly charge transactions to appropriation accounts since these accounts provide the department with legal authority to incur and pay obligations for goods or services. DOD has hundreds of current and closed appropriation accounts that were authorized by law over the years. Similar to a checking account, the funds available in DOD's appropriation accounts must be reduced or increased as the department spends money or receives collections that it is authorized to retain for its own use. Just as an individual who maintains multiple checking accounts must be sure that transactions are recorded to the proper account, DOD also must ensure that the proper appropriation account is charged or credited for each specific disbursement and collection. Our review found that DOD's guidance and processes developed to ensure compliance with the legislation provided reasonable assurance that amounts were written off properly except that check payment differences did not have the required written certification. The write-off process did not correct underlying records and significant DOD resources were needed to ensure that write-off amounts were properly identified and handled. Also, using staff resources to process old transactions resulted in fewer staff to research and clear current problems. At December 31, 2004, DOD reports showed that after the write-offs, more than $1.3 billion (absolute value) of suspense amounts and $39 million of check differences remained uncleared for more than 60 days. However, DOD has acknowledged that its suspense reports are incomplete and inaccurate. Until DOD complies with existing laws and enforces its own guidance for reconciling, reporting, and resolving amounts in suspense and check differences on a regular basis, the buildup of current balances will likely continue, the department's appropriation accounts will remain unreliable, and another costly write-off process may eventually be required.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Stonehenge International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:General Accounting Office Reports & Testimony
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:581
Previous Article:Survey of Program Officials--Review of Federal Programs Supporting People with Disabilities.
Next Article:Fair Labor Standards Act: Labor Made Key Decisions in Studies of Updated Overtime Rule and Contractor Provided Support.
Topics:


Related Articles
Federal agencies don't comply with CFO Act.
DFAS/GSA Joint Solutions Team-partners for success.
DOD financial management under fire in Congress, OMB.
Information barriers hamper anti-terror efforts.
We're talking SFIS: introducing the common business language of DoD.
DOD Business Transformation: Sustained Leadership Needed to Address Long-standing Financial and Business Management Problems.
DOD's High-Risk Areas: High-Level Commitment and Oversight Needed for DOD Supply Chain Plan to Succeed.
Defense Business Transformation: A Full-time Chief Management Officer with a Term Appointment Is Needed at DOD to Maintain Continuity of Effort and...
DOD Personnel Clearances: DOD Faces Multiple Challenges in Its Efforts to Improve Clearance Processes for Industry Personnel.
Improper Payments: Responses to Posthearing Questions Related to Status of Agencies' Efforts to Address Improper Payment and Recovery Auditing...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters