Printer Friendly

DL-carnitine as supplementary levocarnitine source in plant-based diets to Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings.

The inclusion of plant ingredients in aquafeeds has increased in recent years, which is necessary to reduce dependence on fishmeal as a protein source and improve aquaculture sustainability. However, plant protein sources are admittedly deficient in some nutrients that need dietary supplementation (Yang et al., 2012). L-carnitine is a quaternary amine, endogenously synthesized from lysine and methionine, together with vitamin C and other secondary compounds as cofactors.

The main function of L-carnitine is the transport of long-chain fatty acids through the cell membrane for oxidation in mitochondria. It is present in high concentrations in animal feeds (16-1200 mg [kg.sup.-1]). However, plant ingredients are poor (<0.5 mg [kg.sup.-1]) in L-carnitine (Harpaz, 2005).

In farming conditions, stressful situations (e.g., thermal stress, the presence of xenobiotics) are frequent, and therefore, the endogenous demand for L-carnitine increase. Fish in the initial growth stage possess a lower ability to produce endogenous L-carnitine, although at this age there is a high-energy demand and a lower resistance to stress factors. Under such circumstances, dietary L-carnitine supplementation may be necessary, as the concentration present in high-fat diets and rich in plant protein sources may not be enough to address fish dietary requirements (Becker et al., 1999; Yang et al., 2012). Additionally, farmed fish have lower concentrations of endogenous L-carnitine when compared to wildlife fish (Santulli & D'Amelio, 1986).

To date, a cost-effective optimum level of dietary L-carnitine supplementation to promote fish growth has not yet been identified (Mohseni & Ozorio, 2014). In fact, results have been inconsistent, even in studies with the same species (Harpaz, 2005). For instance, growth promotion in tilapias was reported in concentrations that ranged from 150 to 900 mg of levocarnitine per kg of diet (Jayaprakas et al., 1996; Becker et al., 1999). These levels are three to eighteen times higher than the ones recommended for poultry (Arslan, 2006). Becker et al. (1999) suggested that supplementation of up to 150 mg [kg.sup.-1] of L-carnitine in diets for hybrid tilapias (O. niloticus x O. aureus) would be cost-effective. Nonetheless, due to the high cost of pure levocarnitine supplements, an analysis of cost-effectiveness is always necessary when including these in fish diets (Harpaz, 2005). By contrast, DL-carnitine has a lower cost (Dqbrowska & Starek, 2014) concerning the pure levorotatory form. Probably, due to this fact, it has been used in several pharmaceutical formulations and supplement manufacturers in different countries (Lopes et al., 2004; Sanchez-Hernandez et al., 2010b). Thus, this study evaluated the supplementation of DL=carnitine in diets of Nile tilapia fingerlings.

A basal diet (Table 1) was formulated without animal protein sources to minimize the presence of endogenous carnitine and supply the nutritional requirements of Nile tilapia (NRC, 2011). DL-carnitine was supplied as chloridrate of DL-carnitine (Sigma Aldrich[R]). DL-carnitine (DLC) was included in supplemented diets decreasing the inert content in the same proportion (0.5 DLC+9.5 INE; 1.0 DLC+9.0 INE; 1.5 DLC+8.5 INE; 2.0 DLC+8.0 INE; 3.0 DLC+ 7.0 INE and 4.0 DLC+6.0 INE g [kg.sup.-1] of diet). All other ingredients were supplied in the same concentrations described for basal diet.

Each experimental ingredient was ground using a hammer mill (0.8 mm sieve). Then, the ingredients were mixed, moistened (30%) with distilled water at 40[degrees]C and pelletized in a mincer. Diets were dried at in a forced ventilation oven (30[degrees]C by 24 h) and stored at 4[degrees]C until used.

Nile tilapia fingerlings (initial weight of 0.8 [+ or -] 0.01 g) were stocked in a set of 60 L glass aquariums (15 fish/aquarium) within a recirculation water system, with biological, mechanical and ultraviolet filters, supplemental aeration and temperature control. Every two days, the aquariums were drained at 30% of water volume to remove feces and diet waste. Water temperature (28.5 [+ or -] 0.8[degrees]C) and dissolved oxygen (4.3 [+ or -] 0.6 mg [L.sup.-1]) were monitored daily. Additional water quality parameters were checked weekly, such as ammonia (<0.01 mg [L.sup.-1]), nitrite (0.6 [+ or -] 0.3 mg [L.sup.-1]), hardness (106 [+ or -] 25 mg CaC[O.sub.3] [L.sup.-1]), alkalinity (36 [+ or -] 16 mg CaC[O.sub.3] [L.sup.-1]) and pH (6.8 [+ or -] 0.4). A constant photoperiod of 12 h light and 12 h dark was maintained.

Experimental diets were singly assigned to four groups, in a randomized experimental design. Fish were hand-fed carefully three times per day until apparent satiation (08:30, 12:30 and 17:30 h). Feed consumption was recorded weekly for each aquarium.

A sample of fish (n = 30) from the same population that started the experiment fasted for 24 h, killed by benzocaine overdoses (500 mg [L.sup.-1]) for the determination of whole-body chemical composition. After 70 days, fish have fasted for 24 h, anesthetized (benzocaine, 50 mg [L.sup.-1]) and the number and weight of the fish in each replicate was measured. Five fish from each aquarium were killed, as previously described, to obtain a pooled sample to determine whole-body chemical composition. Another five fish were randomly collected, killed, individually weighted, dissected to obtain liver and mesenteric fat weight and muscle samples. All biological samples were kept frozen (20[degrees]C) prior to the analysis. The weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion and nutrient retention were calculated according to NRC (2011).

The chemical analyses of diets and fish samples were performed according to the methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2000). Crude protein content was determined by the Kjeldahl method (Nx6.25). Crude lipid content was determined by the Soxhlet method. Moisture content was determined after drying in an oven at 105[degrees]C until constant weight. Ash content was determined after combustion in a muffle furnace at 550[degrees]C for 6 h.

Data were checked for normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) and homogeneity of variance (Bartlett test) before statistical analysis. One way ANOVA followed by Tukey's Studentized Range Test were used to determine the significant effect of treatments. The significance of differences was tested at P < 0.05 level.

The global survival rate of fish during the trial was 98.1% and was not influenced (P > 0.05) by treatments. The before fish well accepted all experimental diets. Growth parameters of fish fed on DL-carnitine supplemented diets did not differ (P > 0.05) from that of fish fed on control diet (Table 2). Dietary DL-carnitine content did not affect (P > 0.05) the whole body dry matter, protein, and ash (Table 3). A similar result (P > 0.05) was obtained for dry matter and protein from muscle. Muscular lipids decreased (P < 0.05) in fish fed with 3000 and 4000 mg [kg.sup.-1] DL-carnitine-supplemented diets (Fig. 1), but no additional reduction (P > 0.05) in lipids was observed increasing dietary DL-carnitine from 3000 to 4000 mg [kg.sup.-1]. However, there was no effect on dietary DL-carnitine supplementation in whole body lipid content in tilapia fingerlings.

Usually, the positive results of the supplementation of L-carnitine in aquafeeds are attributed to the protein sparing effect as a result of increased energy from lipid oxidation (Mohseni & Ozorio, 2014). However, when there is no growth promoting effect, this result is attributed to differences in the physiology of the species, developmental stage of fish, farming conditions, formulation of experimental diets, in addition to other reasons (Harpaz, 2005). The physiologic mechanisms which promote fish growth when dietary L-carnitine is supplemented were not adequately defined (Ma et al., 2008). Some studies registered a linear dose-response relationship of L-carnitine in growth (Torreele et al., 1993; Jayaprakas et al., 1996). On the other hand, other studies have reported a null response (Becker et al., 1999) or a decrease in growth (Mohseni & Ozorio, 2014) at concentrations of L-carnitine above the recommended for effectiveness.

DL-carnitine hydrochloride comprises 50% of L-carnitine and 50% of D-carnitine. Consequently, we estimated daily intake of approximately 0.2 (diet with 500 mg [kg.sup.-1]) to 1.5 mg (diet with 4000 mg [kg.sup.-1]) of D-carnitine per g of live weight at the end of the experiment, without a negative effect on fish performance. On the other hand, Santulli & D'Amelio (1986) registered a decrease in growth of juvenile sea bass Dicentrachus labrax ranged from 13 to 25% when fed daily with 0.025 mg of pure D-carnitine per gram of live weight. Despite the high intake of D-carnitine in the presented study, the intestinal absorption of levocarnitine occurs 1.6 to 2.0 times faster than the D-form (Gross & Henderson, 1984), which has possibly hindered any adverse effect on the performance of tilapia fingerlings. Indeed, also no difference was recorded in the weight gain, hematological parameters and serum concentration of free carnitine between Winstar rats fed diets supplemented with L- or DL-carnitine (Bazotte & Lopes-Bertolini, 2012).

Generally, the dietary carnitine supplementation is expected to decrease the lipid deposition and increase the protein deposition in fish, due to its action in lipid metabolism (Harpaz, 2005; Mohseni & Ozorio, 2014). However, akin to what happens regarding growth, the action of L-carnitine on the lipid compo-sition of fish is also inconsistent. Several authors have not reported any effect on the body and/or muscle lipid composition of several species (Gaylord & Gatlin, 2000; Twibell & Brown, 2000; Dias et al., 2001; Yilmaz et al., 2004), including tilapias (Becker et al., 1999; Yang et al., 2009; Erdogan et al., 2015). It is possible that the location of adipocytes in body tissues are responsible for the interspecific differences in body chemical composition of fish when dietary L-carnitine is supplemented (Yang et al., 2012).

In the present study, the dietary DL-carnitine supplementation decreased the muscle lipid deposition, but it did not decrease the whole-body lipid or the liposomal fat deposition of fingerlings of the Nile tilapia. This result is similar to the one reported by Ma et al. (2008) for juvenile black sea bream Sparus microcephalus. Yang et al. (2012) also report an ambiguous result on L-carnitine in body lipids of juvenile silver perch Bidyanus bidyanus. These authors registered a decrease in whole-body lipid, but not in muscle lipid concentration of fish feeding supplemented diets with 400 mg [kg.sup.-1] of L-carnitine.

Tilapias deposit lipids primarily in the form of intraperitoneal fat due to excess dietary energy (Han et al., 2011). However, fish were at an early growth stage, when high-energy demand results in minimal fat deposition (Shearer, 1994). The concentration of muscle carnitine is directly associated with dietary supplementation of L-carnitine (Gaylord & Gatlin, 2000; Yang et al., 2012), since, in the body of animals, the muscle is the primary accumulation site (Harpaz, 2005). Hence, the decrease of body lipids of tilapia fingerlings that stems from the dietary supplementation of 3000 mg [kg.sup.-1] of DL-carnitine is likely related to the accumulation of L-carnitine in muscle, as hypothesized by Ma et al. (2008).

Comparative evaluations of results drawn for different species under varying infrastructural and animal management conditions are a rather complex task, especially because many studies do not report origin, level of purity and/or the chemical form of the L-carnitine source which was used. Several pharmaceutical formulations and supplements are manufactured with racemate (DL-carnitine), although only the levorotatory form is biologically active (Sanchez-Hernandez et al., 2010a, 2010b; Dqbrowska & Starek, 2014). Therefore, considering that no effect on growth promotion and decreasing muscle lipid contents has already been reported for different species' fed diets supplemented with L-carnitine (Harpaz, 2005), it is fair to infer that, in some cases, manufacturers of supplements may have used DL-carnitine. This can be a possible but yet partial, explanation for the conflicting results reported in studies on the supplementation of L-carnitine to fish diets.

Therefore, albeit the fact that dietary DL-carnitine supplementation did not promote an increase in Nile tilapia performance, there was a decrease in the deposition of muscle lipids of tilapia fingerlings. Despite the similarity of these results with other previous studies on the use of pure L-carnitine in fish, and considering to this supplement's low cost, we find it premature to rule out the eventual use of this source of supplementary L-carnitine in aquafeeds.

DOI: 10.3856/vol46-issue4-fulltext-20


This research was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq; Project N[degrees]475841/2009-3) and Funda?ao de Amparo a Ciencia e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE; APQ-0882-5.06/12). Both institutions also provided scientific initiation scholarships for FMS (PIC/UFRPE/CNPq) and MLSF (FACEPE; Project n[degrees] BIC-0270-5.06/14), which is why the authors are also in debt. Finally, the authors would like to thank Companhia de Desenvolvimento dos Vales do Sao Francisco e Parnaiba (CODEVASF; 57EPI; Porto Real do Colegio, AL, Brazil) for donating the Nile tilapia fingerlings.


Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2000. Methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Maryland, 1018 pp.

Arslan, C. 2006. L-carnitine and its use as a feed additive in poultry feeding a review. Rev. Med. Vet., 157: 134-142.

Bazotte, R.B. & G. Lopes-Bertolini. 2012. Effects of oral L-carnitine and DL-carnitine supplementation on alloxan-diabetic rats. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 55: 81-88.

Becker, K., S. Schreiber, C. Angoni & R. Blum. 1999. Growth performance and feed utilization response of Oreochromis niloticus x Oreochromis aureus hybrids to L-carnitine measured over a full fattening cycle under commercial conditions. Aquaculture, 174: 313-322.

Dqbrowska, M. & M. Starek. 2014. Analytical approaches to determination of carnitine in biological materials, foods and dietary supplements. Food Chem., 142: 220-232.

Dias, J., J. Arzel, G. Corraze & J. Kaushik. 2001. Effects of dietary L-carnitine supplementation on growth and lipid metabolism in European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquacult. Res., 32: 206-215.

Erdogan, F., M. Kanyilmaz, B. Aydin, M. Erdogan, A. Aksoy & E. Gumus. 2015. Effect of dietary supplementation of L-carnitine on growth, feed utilization and liver histology in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) fry. Indian J. Fish., 62: 123-127.

Furuya, W.M., L.E. Pezzato, M.M. Barros, W.R. Boscolo, J.E.P. Cyrino, V.R.B. Furuya & A. Feiden. 2010. Tabelas Brasileiras para a nutricao de tilapias. Toledo GFM, 100 pp.

Gaylord, T.G. & D.M. Gatlin. 2000. Dietary lipid level but not L-carnitine affects growth performance of hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops [female] x M. saxatilis [male]). Aquaculture, 190: 237-246.

Gross, C.J. & L.M. Henderson. 1984. Absorption of d- and l-carnitine by the intestine and kidney tubule in the rat. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 772: 209-219.

Han, C.-Y., X.-B. Wen, Q.-M. Zheng & H.-B. Li. 2011. Effects of dietary lipid levels on lipid deposition and activities of lipid metabolic enzymes in hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus x O. aureus). J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 95: 609-615.

Harpaz, S. 2005. L-carnitine and its attribute functions in fish culture and nutrition-a review. Aquaculture, 249: 3-21.

Jayaprakas, V., C. Sambhu & S.S. Kumar. 1996. Effect of dietary L-carnitine on growth and reproductive performance of male Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters). Fish. Technol., 33: 84-90.

Lopes, G., V.A.F.G. Gazola, S.B. Galende, W. Alves-do-Prado, R. Curi & R.B. Bazotte. 2004. Comparative acute effects of L-carnitine and DL-carnitine on hepatic catabolism of L-alanine and L-glutamine in rats. Acta Pharmacol. Sin., 25: 1257-1261.

Ma, J.J., Z.R. Xu, Q.J. Shao, J.Z. Xu, S.S.O. Hung, W.L. Hu & L.Y. Zhuo. 2008. Effect of supplemental dietary L-carnitine on growth performance, body composition and antioxidant status in juvenile black sea bream, Sparus macrocephalus. Aquacult. Nutr., 14: 464-471.

Mohseni, M. & R.O.A. Ozorio. 2014. Effects of dietary L-carnitine level on growth performance, body composition and antioxidant status in beluga (Huso huso L. 1758). Aquacult. Nutr., 20: 477-485.

National Research Council (NRC). 2011. Nutrient requirement of fish. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 392 pp.

Sanchez-Hernandez, L., M. Castro-Puyana, C. Garcia-Ruiz, A.L. Crego & M.L. Marina. 2010a. Determination of L and D -carnitine in dietary food supplements using capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem., 120: 921-928.

Sanchez-Hernandez, L., C. Garcia-Ruiz, A.L. Crego & M.L. Marina. 2010b. Sensitive determination of d-carnitine as enantiomeric impurity of levocarnitine in pharmaceutical formulations by capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 53: 1217-1223.

Santulli, A. & V. D'Amelio. 1986. The effects of carnitine on the growth of sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax L., fry. J. Fish Biol., 28: 81-86.

Santulli, A. & V. D'Amelio. 1986. Effects of supplemental dietary carnitine on growth and lipid metabolism of hatchery-reared sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Aquaculture, 59: 177-186.

Shearer, K.D. 1994. Factors affecting the proximate composition of cultured fishes with emphasis on salmonids. Aquaculture, 119: 63-88.

Torreele, E., A. van Der Sluiszen & J. Verreth. 1993. The effect of dietary L-carnitine on the growth performance in fingerlings of the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) concerning dietary lipid. Brit. J. Nutr., 69: 289-299.

Twibell, R.G. & P.B. Brown. 2000. Effects of dietary carnitine on growth rates and body composition of hybrid striped bass (Morone saxatilis male x M. chrysops female). Aquaculture, 187: 153-161.

Yang, S., F. Liu & C. Liou. 2012. Effects of dietary L-carnitine, plant proteins and lipid levels on growth performance, body composition, blood traits and muscular carnitine status in juvenile silver perch (Bidyanus bidyanus). Aquaculture, 342-343: 48-55.

Yang, S., Y. Wen, C.-H. Liou & F. Liu. 2009. Influence of dietary L-carnitine on growth, biological traits and meat quality in Tilapia. Aquacult. Res., 40: 1374-1382.

Yilmaz, E., M. Naz & I. Akyurt. 2004. Effect of dietary olive pomace oil and L-carnitine on growth and chemical composition of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). Isr. J. Aquacult., 56: 14-21.

Received: 16 July 2017; Accepted: 2 November 2017

Fabio Marcello da Silva (1), Maria Leiliane Silva Ferreira (1) Jorge Eduardo Cavalcante-Lucena (1) & Alvaro Jose de Almeida Bicudo (2)

(1) Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Garanhuns, PE, Brazil

(2) Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Parana, Palotina, PR, Brazil

Corresponding author: Alvaro Jose de Almeida Bicudo (

Corresponding editor: Jesus Ponce-Palafox

Caption: Figure 1. Lipid content of Nile tilapia fingerlings fed with graded levels of DL-carnitine in free-animal protein diets after 70 days. Different letters denote differences by Tukey's Studentized Range Test (P < 0.05).
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition (wet basis) of basal
diet. a) Assurance levels ([kg.sup.-1] product): vit. A, 1.000.000 UI;
vit. D3, 312.500 UI; vit. E, 18.750 UI; vit. K3, 1.250 mg; vit. B,
2.500 mg; vit. B2, 2.500 mg; vit. B6, 1.875 mg; vit. B12, 4 mg;
Vitamin C, 31.250 mg; Nicotinic acid. 12.500 mg; Calcium pantothenate
6.250 mg; Biotin 125 mg; Folic acid 750 mg; Choline 50.000 mg;
Inositol 12.500 mg; Iron sulphate 6.250 mg; Copper sulfate 625 mg;
Zinc sulfate 6.250 mg; Manganese sulfate 1875 mg; Sodium selenite 13
mg; Calcium iodate 63 mg; Cobalt sulphate 13 mg, b) DL-carnitine
hydrochloride (50% L-carnitine)--Sigma Aldrich[R] (C9 500), c)
calculate from Furuya et al. (2010).

Ingredients                                g [kg.sup.-1]

Soybean meal                                   600.0
Wheat bran                                     150.0
Corn                                           105.8
Soybean oil                                    60.0
Cornstarch                                     50.0
Vitamin and mineral mix (a)                    10.0
Dicalcium phosphate                            10.0
DL-Methionine                                   4.0
Inert                                          10.0
DL-Carnitine (b)                                0.0
BHT                                             0.2

Chemical composition

Dry matter (g [kg.sup.-1])                     953.1
Crude protein (g [kg.sup.-1])                  322.9
Crude lipid (g [kg.sup.-1])                    67.5
Ash (g [kg.sup.-1])                            60.0
Digestible energy (kcal [kg.sup.-1]) (c)       3,594

Table 2. Growth performance of Nile tilapia fingerlings fed with
graded levels of DL/carnitine in free/animal protein diets after 70
days. FW: final weight (g), WG: weight gain [WG (%) = 100x(final
weight/initial weight/initial weight)], SGR: specific growth rate [SGR
(% live weight per day) = (ln final weigh/in initial weight)/
experimental period in days], DFI: daily feed intake index [DFI (%
live weight per day) = 100 x feed intake/(final weight + initial
weight)/2/experimental period in days], FCR: feed conversion ratio
(FCR = feed intake/weight gain), PPV: protein productive value [PPV
(%) = (final weight x final whole body protein)/(initial weight x
initial whole/body protein)/crude protein intake].

Parameters                 DL-carnitine levels (mg [kg.sup.-1])

                     0                  500                1000

FW           21.2 [+ or -] 2.3   23.0 [+ or -] 0.7   21.0 [+ or -] 1.9
WG           2481 [+ or -] 312   2725 [+ or -] 101   2466 [+ or -] 230
SGR          4.6 [+ or -] 0.2    4.8 [+ or -] 0.1    4.6 [+ or -] 0.1
DFI          3.5 [+ or -] 0.1    3.4 [+ or -] 0.1    3.6 [+ or -] 0.1
FCR          1.3 [+ or -] 0.1    1.3 [+ or -] 0.1    1.4 [+ or -] 0.1
PPV          33.1 [+ or -] 1.5   35.2 [+ or -] 1.0   32.6 [+ or -] 2.0

Parameters                DL-carnitine levels (mg [kg.sup.-1])

                   1500                2000                3000

FW           23.7 [+ or -] 0.9   20.8 [+ or -] 1.7   21.4 [+ or -] 1.9
WG           2799 [+ or -] 10    2424 [+ or -] 169   2544 [+ or -] 231
SGR          4.8 [+ or -] 0.1    4.6 [+ or -] 0.1    4.7 [+ or -] 0.1
DFI          3.4 [+ or -] 0.1    3.7 [+ or -] 0.3    3.6 [+ or -] 0.3
FCR          1.3 [+ or -] 0.1    1.4 [+ or -] 0.1    1.4 [+ or -] 0.1
PPV          33.9 [+ or -] 1.4   31.0 [+ or -] 2.0   32.8 [+ or -] 2.9

                levels (mg
Parameters     [kg.sup.-1])


FW           21.5 [+ or -] 2.4
WG           2508 [+ or -] 267
SGR          4.7 [+ or -] 0.1
DFI          3.7 [+ or -] 0.2
FCR          1.4 [+ or -] 0.1
PPV          33.4 [+ or -] 3.1

Table 3. Chemical composition (wet basis) of Nile tilapia fingerlings
fed with graded levels of DL-carnitine in free-animal protein diets
after 70 days.

Parameters        DL-carnitine levels (mg [kg.sup.-1])

                         0                  500

Whole body
Dry matter (%)   26.5 [+ or -] 0.2   25.1 [+ or -] 0.8
Ash (%)          2.5 [+ or -] 0.1    2.4 [+ or -] 0.1
Protein (%)      14.3 [+ or -] 0.3   13.9 [+ or -] 0.4
Dry matter (%)   21.8 [+ or -] 0.2   21.7 [+ or -] 0.5
Protein (%)      18.1 [+ or -] 0.3   18.1 [+ or -] 0.4

Parameters        DL-carnitine levels (mg [kg.sup.-1])

                        1000                1500

Whole body
Dry matter (%)   26.0 [+ or -] 1.2    25.3 [+ or -] 0.6
Ash (%)           2.5 [+ or -] 0.1    2.6 [+ or -] 0.1
Protein (%)      14.3 [+ or -] 0.6    14.1 [+ or -] 0.3
Dry matter (%)   22.3 [+ or -] 0.2    21.5 [+ or -] 0.3
Protein (%)      18. 5 [+ or -] 0.2   17.7 [+ or -] 0.2

Parameters        DL-carnitine levels (mg [kg.sup.-1])

                       2000                3000

Whole body
Dry matter (%)   25.6 [+ or -] 2.4   25.5 [+ or -] 1.3
Ash (%)          2.5 [+ or -] 0.1    2.5 [+ or -] 0.1
Protein (%)      14.2 [+ or -] 1.0   14.2 [+ or -] 0.4
Dry matter (%)   22.0 [+ or -] 0.1   21.8 [+ or -] 0.3
Protein (%)      18.3 [+ or -] 0.3   18.1 [+ or -] 0.1

                    levels (mg
Parameters         [kg.sup.-1])


Whole body
Dry matter (%)   26.0 [+ or -] 0.8
Ash (%)          2.6 [+ or -] 0.1
Protein (%)      14.4 [+ or -] 0.5
Dry matter (%)   22.1 [+ or -] 0.1
Protein (%)      18.4 [+ or -] 0.2
COPYRIGHT 2018 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Short Communication
Author:da Silva, Fabio Marcello; Ferreira, Maria Leiliane Silva; Cavalcante-Lucena, Jorge Eduardo; Bicudo,
Publication:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Date:Sep 1, 2018
Previous Article:The larval development from prezoea to megalopa and juvenile stages of Allopetrolisthes punctatus (Guerin, 1835) (Decapoda, Anomura, Porcellanidae).
Next Article:Size and relative condition index of the brown sea cucumber Isostichopus fuscus in the northern Gulf of California, Mexico.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |