DEMOCRATIC FORMS OF WORKPLACE GOVERNANCE.
In a democratic workplace, employees may certainly play a part in and shape the decisions which alter their lives at work (a democratic workplace offers suitable chances for employees to engage in decisions which impact their activity at work). Entailing a broader range of employees in decision-making maintains more information and various perspectives to be taken into account. Additionally, individuals are more interested in carrying out decisions voluntarily if they have been associated with them. Shared decision-making may enhance connections between management and the employees. Diverse stakeholders in decision-making should be involved with the purpose of supporting more significant power distribution at the company level, thus diminishing the autarchic power of management and providing employees with superior command regarding decisions which concern them. A more democratic workplace is one in which employees have a more relevant participation in decisions, being instrumental in superior distribution of authority and power in the workplace (Becerra Alonso et al., 2016), in greater motivation, and improving output. Workplace democracy may arise via separate membership of trade unions (Mihaila, 2016a) which may negotiate jointly with management and express their members' concerns in diverse manners. Workplace democracy may be carried out via membership of other representative entities (e.g. works councils or collective consultative committees) that may be influential in matters which are particular to the workplace or company. Workplace democracy may develop into direct participation in the regulation of labor, e.g. via self managing workgroups (Lazaroiu, 2015a), the reconfiguration of jobs and other work-related issues. (Lansbury, 2009)
2. The Question of Democracy in the Workplace
Employees aim a shared impact at work (Brown, 2016), even if it is not as much of an authoritative influence than unionization and shared bargaining may bring. In the United States, federal law impedes employers to preserve representative structures via which workers may substantially debate workplace interests unless they are completely autonomous of the employer. Workers can decide not to be represented by a union (Popescu-Ljungholm, 2015a), and employers can pay satisfactory wages and act toward personnel adequately expecting to fend off unionization. It is not legitimate for workers to opt for, or for employers to provide, a less oppositional, less autonomous, and less effective type of employee representation (Nica et al., 2016a) than a union. Nearly all employees need some kind of shared representation with the intention of implementing the combination of legal mandates and democratic norms (Peters, 2015a) by which they are presently governed at work. The putting into practice of mandates is chiefly under the authority of workers, and is affected by both shared action issues and the concern of reprisals. (Estlund, 2014)
Separate involvement in political undertakings outside the workplace is influenced by workers' practices inside the workplace, encompassing participation in labor union activities, e.g. shared bargaining and grievance resolution, in addition to non-union, separate decision-making in all workplaces. Assessments of organizational management routines are generally directed inward, chiefly addressing how they impact entities and work-related results for employees. Workplace, when configured judiciously, may act as a training ground (Cesaroni et al., 2015) for democratic approaches and conducts by furthering a sense of agency aside from transferable skills. Superior workplace participation tends to be related to more significant political involvement. Dictatorial and authoritarian workplace routines tend to be associated with diminished political engagement in the democratic sphere. Workers with superior degrees of distinct influence at work (Olssen and Peters, 2015) are considerably more disposed to play a part in a wide array of pro-democratic conducts. The link between workplace democracy and political one both holds throughout various countries, and accordingly across distinct institutional settings, but is also influenced somewhat by particular institutional considerations. (Budd et al., 2018)
For numerous individuals, working activity is a starting place of maltreatment that destabilizes the human spirit. Furthermore, work experience and incentives may be tremendously biased among employees of distinct race, gender, and separate merit. The typical workplace, whether privately owned (Lazaroiu, 2015b) or government-sponsored (Ionescu, 2016), is administered by a commanding regime in which the rights of employees are discredited to the formal and informal regulations and routines of individuals who control and regulate the workplace. The entitlements of private or government property (Popescu Ljungholm, 2015b) and the law of contracts supersede nearly all political rights, encompassing those attested by state and federal constitutions (Nica, 2016a) as component of a contractual arrangement in which employees recognize the command of individuals who administer their employment. In return for the advantage of labor and earnings, employees sacrifice their fundamental political rights, e.g. freedom of speech and association (Hanappi et al., 2016), and the capacity by the supervised to choose who will command their entity. (Levin, 2006)
3. Employee Involvement and Organizational Participation
Whenever there are employees eager to labor for less than the law demands, employers are extremely interested in paying them less. Some employers commonly disregard minimum wage and overtime stipulations. Other employers miscategorize personnel as exempt from the law's specifications or call for "off-the-clock" work. Some companies invest significantly in amenability and employee safety, but others strive by reducing labor expenses (Peters, 2016a), and considerably by neglecting safety measures, or by pressuring employees at a pace that compels them to take shortcuts. Workers should take the main role in supervising and implementing their own labor criteria. Shared action issues affect numerous terms of employment (Devine, 2015), as employers supervise their employees principally via policies and routines, not personalized agreements. If an employer requests "off-the-clock" labor from a collective of workers, an individual worker who denounces that routine deals with a "free rider" issue: both the expense to the employer and the advantage to workers of amending the routine notably surpass the advantage to the separate complainant. A discontented worker bears all the expenses and only a tiny proportion of the advantages of opposing the employer. (Estlund, 2014)
In developed societies, labor is concurrently appreciated for supplying the means for gratification and depreciated for being demanding and enforced. The principle of meaningful labor maintains an influential hold upon employees' resourcefulness, stimulating them to pursue work which intensifies the personal aim of their lives, and to crave for a society altered by each individual being able to perform the labor which s/he finds worth doing. The current organization of labor is an end result of socio-historical exigencies which still encompass remnant capacities for a more refined experience of work. Social entities may be regulated in consonance with normative criteria (Kantarelis, 2016) beneficial to enabling all individuals to associate meaning content with their lives due to the labor they perform. Work cannot be purposeful if it demands the subjugation of the employee, the distortion of her/his human competences, or the misrecognition of her/his essential undertakings. Being able to undergo one's life as purposeful is a deep-seated human requirement, which, under existing economic settlements, is intensely problematic for nearly all individuals to meet if their labor is deficient in the structure for relevance. Increasing meaningful labor necessitates two capabilities for unbiased examination and affective attachment, backed by individuals' position as co-authorities in the sphere of value. Such capabilities and status allow individuals to associate with others (Weede, 2016) in the social architecture of an enhanced stock of beneficial meanings of labor, which individuals bring into play with the aim of conceiving long-standing practical self-identities. The unbiased content of purposeful labor is comprised by three essential values of self-determination as non-estrangement (Peters, 2015b), self-government as non-ascendancy, and social awareness as respectable labor. Such values already function in nearly all kinds of labor, generating pre-political elucidatory dissimilarities in meanings and values (Gloukhov, 2016) which may be catalyzed to improve the relevance capacity of labor within a structure of workplace democracy. Ordinary human undertaking is configured to establish that labor supplies the framework for conceiving objects which are worth cultivating, and for advancing human potentialities for intersubjective meaning-making. (Yeoman, 2014)
4. The Right of Employees to Participate in Workplace Decision-making
The weakening of unions and the absence of any lawful back-up instrument of concerted voice is instrumental in the underenforcement of labor criteria. The separate employment contract (Popescu, 2016) and the market drives that influence parties to the contract adequately regulate nearly all terms and requirements of employment a large amount of the time for the majority of workers. The latter's immediate option as a reaction to discrimination is the right to resign, but quitting might be rather expensive, particularly for workers who have acquired companyspecific abilities and knowledge, and chiefly in slack labor market circumstances. Workers' assent with democratic norms and assurances of equitable treatment, in addition to information concerning assent, is a public advantage within the personnel. The expense of assent to the employer is frequently much more significant than the advantages to any worker. Thus, even excluding the concern of employer reprisals, each worker is interested in something obtained on others' endeavors to implement norms or stipulations made to a collective of employees. Democratic norms and reputational penalties more thoroughly preserve the requirements of employees with inadequate and higher-level skills. Employees who are deficient in the latter are easier to substitute and to supervise, therefore cutting down the expense to the employer (Nica, 2016c) of its own expediency. Workers' justification to go into opposition (Lavinas, 2015), and to generate an economic dispute with their employer (Nica et al., 2016b), is a key invulnerability against abuse. (Estlund, 2014)
Democratic commitment in civil society may be ahead of workplace democracy (Lucas, 2016) both temporally and causally. The relevance of organizational routines develops beyond the workplace. Public policy interferences may be required to hamper dictatorial work regimes (Nica, 2016b) that curb political commitment. If causality extends from the political sphere to the workplace, consequently a participatory workplace is a significant outlet for persons appreciating political involvement. Workplace participation may hamper employees from getting disappointed or failing to keep their deliberative skills, therefore diminishing the probability that they retire from the political sphere. The organization of labor may have far-reaching non-economic consequences beyond the workplace. (Budd et al., 2018)
Participatory entities have an educative role that fortifies the rightfulness and routine of political commitment in other realms but being in short supply if persons' ordinary experiences are designed as an accessory to a structure of production or organization (Peters, 2016b) that is impassable to the involvement of the employee. The absence of personal agency is instrumental in a condition of all-purpose frailty that extends into other political spheres and operates against political commitment. The most adequate systems of employee commitment supply worker influence in purposeful decisions (Popescu Ljungholm, 2016) in addition to allocation of the advantages of any subsequent enhancement in output and financial outcomes. The logic of furthering decision-making with swift access to relevant information and satisfactory communications assists in encouraging superior democracy in the workplace. (Levin, 2006)
Workplace democracy operates when workers have some substantial ascendancy over organizational objective-setting and strategic planning (Androniceanu and Ohanyan, 2016), and may therefore establish that their own aims, and not only those of the entity, can be satisfied. Involvement does not carry out the demands for workplace democracy, as it functions whenever workers are enabled to shape organizational decisions, even only by indicating manners of putting into action already-made decisions. It is problematical to call into question workers' justification to have an influence in the policy of their jobs (Mihaila, 2016b) and in the broader management of labor and the firm's strategic direction, as workers may be most adversely impacted by the decisions made. Engaging workers in organizational decision-making may generate more significant organizational performance and output. Unpredictability regarding hours and working on-call may be contributors to stress. Providing workers with more command concerning labor arrangements (e.g. the amount of worked hours, the work schedule (Bratu, 2015), the area of work, etc.) may assist them in harmonizing labor with other facets of their lives. (Foley and Polanyi, 2006)
Androniceanu, Armenia, and Gurgen Ohanyan (2016). "Comparative Approach on Education and Healthcare in Romania and Bulgaria as Beneficiaries of the IMF Financial Assistance," Administratie si Management Public 26: 25-48.
Becerra Alonso, David, Armenia Androniceanu, and Irina Georgescu (2016). "Sensitivity and Vulnerability of European Countries in Time of Crisis Based on a New Approach to Data Clustering and Curvilinear Analysis," Administratie si Management Public 27: 46-61.
Bratu, Sofia (2015). "Are Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCBS) Really Positively Associated with Measures of Organizational Effectiveness?," Analysis and Metaphysics 14: 87-93.
Brown, Jessica Autumn (2016). "The New 'Southern Strategy:' Immigration, Race, and 'Welfare Dependency' in Contemporary US Republican Political Discourse," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(2): 22-41.
Budd, John W., J. Ryan Lamare, and Andrew R. Timming (2018). "Learning about Democracy at Work: Cross-National Evidence on the Effects of Employee Participation in Workplace Decision-Making on Political Participation in Civil Society," Industrial and Labor Relations Review. Forthcoming
Cesaroni, Francesca Maria, Annalisa Sentuti, and Andrea Buratti (2015). "Same Crisis, Different Strategies? Italian Men and Women Entrepreneurs in Front of the Economic Recession," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 5(2): 205-231.
Devine, Nesta (2015). "Community, Partnership, and Collaboration," Knowledge Cultures 3(5): 34-41.
Estlund, Cynthia L. (2014). "Citizens of the Corporation? Workplace Democracy in a Post-Union Era," in Greg Urban (ed.), Corporations and Citizenship. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 165-182.
Foley, Janice R., and Michael Polanyi (2006). "Workplace Democracy: Why Bother?," Economic and Industrial Democracy 27(1): 173-191.
Gloukhov, Alexei (2016). "Non-priority of the Freedom Principles: Non-frustration, Noninterference, Non-domination," Review of Contemporary Philosophy 15: 108-131.
Hanappi, Doris, Valerie-Anne Ryser, and Laura Bernardi (2016). "The Role of Attitudes towards Maternal Employment in the Relationship between Job Quality and Fertility Intentions," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6(1): 192-219.
Ionescu, Luminita (2016). "Has China's Anti-corruption Strategy Reduced Corruption or Purged Political Rivals?," Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 8(1): 245-251.
Kantarelis, Demetri (2016). "A Measure of Net Dependency between the Economies of the USA and Its Major Trading Partners," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(1): 113-145.
Lansbury, Russell (2009). "Workplace Democracy and the Global Financial Crisis," Journal of Industrial Relations 51(5): 599-616.
Lavinas, Lena (2015). "Latin America: Anti-Poverty Schemes Instead of Social Protection," Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 7(1): 112-171.
Lazaroiu, George (2015a). "Employee Motivation and Job Performance," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 14: 97-102.
Lazaroiu, George (2015b). "Work Motivation and Organizational Behavior," Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 7(2): 66-75.
Levin, Henry M. (2006). "Worker Democracy and Worker Productivity," Social Justice Research 19(1): 109-121.
Lucas, Robert E.B. (2016). "Integral Migration in Developing Economies: An Overview of Recent Evidence," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(2): 159-191.
Mihaila, Ramona (2016a). "Female Labor Force Participation and Gender Wage Discrimination," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6(1): 262-268.
Mihaila, Ramona (2016b). "Is the Decrease in the Gender Wage Gap the Principal Driver of the Sustained Rise in Female Labor Market Participation?," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6(2): 146-152.
Nica, Elvira (2016a). "Employee Voluntary Turnover as a Negative Indicator of Organizational Effectiveness," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 4(2): 220-226.
Nica, Elvira (2016b). "Will Technological Unemployment and Workplace Automation Generate Greater Capital-Labor Income Imbalances?," Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 11(4): 68-74.
Nica, Elvira (2016c). "The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Organizational Commitment and Employee Performance," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4(4): 34-40.
Nica, Elvira, Cristina Manole, and Roxana Briscariu (2016a). "The Detrimental Consequences of Perceived Job Insecurity on Health and Psychological Well-being," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 4(1): 175-181.
Nica, Elvira, Cristina Manole, and Ana-Madalina Potcovaru (2016b). "Competition in the Worldwide Workplace: Economic Globalization and Labor Rights," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4(3): 73-79.
Olssen, Mark, and Michael A. Peters (2015). "Marx, Education and the Possibilities of a Fairer World: Reviving Radical Political Economy through Foucault," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 14: 39-69.
Peters, Michael A. (2015a). "The History and Practice of Lying in Public Life," Review of Contemporary Philosophy 14: 43-56.
Peters, Michael A. (2015b). "Education as the Power of Partnership: The Context of Co-labor-ation," Knowledge Cultures 3(5): 16-30.
Peters, Michael A. (2016a). "Biopolitical Economies of Debt," Analysis and Metaphysics 15: 7-19.
Peters, Michael A. (2016b). "Dissident Thought: Systems of Repression, Networks of Hope," Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 8(1): 20-36.
Popescu, Gheorghe H. (2016). "The Role of Multinational Corporations in Global Environmental Politics," Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 11(3): 72-78.
Popescu-Ljungholm, Doina (2015a). "The Impact of Transparency in Enhancing Public Sector Performance," Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 7(1): 172-178.
Popescu Ljungholm, Doina (2015b). "The Practice of Performance Management in Public Sector Organizations," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 7(2): 190-196.
Popescu Ljungholm, Doina (2016). "The Role of Work Organizations in the Social Construction of Gender," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6(1): 269-275.
Weede, Erich (2016). "Geopolitics, Institutions, and Economics: On the Rise and Decline of Civilizations," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(1): 177-220.
Yeoman, Ruth (2014). Meaningful Work and Workplace Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
DOINA POPESCU LJUNGHOLM email@example.com University of Pitesti
How to cite: Popescu Ljungholm, Doina (2017). "Democratic Forms of Workplace Governance," Analysis and Metaphysics 16: 110-116.
Received 17 March 2017 * Received in revised form 18 July 2017
Accepted 22 July 2017 * Available online 14 August 2017
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Ljungholm, Doina Popescu|
|Publication:||Analysis and Metaphysics|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2017|
|Previous Article:||METAPHYSICAL DESPAIR AND TRAGIC HUMANISM IN MALRAUX.|
|Next Article:||DO INCESSANT COMPARISONS ON SOCIAL MEDIA GENERATE FACEBOOK ENVY?|