Printer Friendly


* "While it is largely agreed that there is a crucial need to defend the freedom of business in order to avoid additional regulations, the fact that free enterprise has already been crippled by government intervention is ignored.... Many business spokesmen seem to believe that the existing system of interventions represents free enterprise, whereas any new regulations would be socialistic."

Charles G. Koch, "Anti-Capitalism & Business"

* "Topless dancing is protected by the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of expression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has ruled."


* "Many gurus flit about the land today predicting a monetary armageddon while urging the necessity for squirreling away gold and oatmeal in order to survive. The assumption is that those who do not have these materials will either break out in red-eyed rioting rage and burn down the countryside, or sit quietly on curbstones and die. The early months of 1933 are the only laboratory. we have to observe what people actually did under such stress....The fact is that an enormous volume of business was transacted without any banks or money at all."

James J. Martin. "Business & the New Deal"
COPYRIGHT 2000 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2000
Previous Article:The Coders' Code.
Next Article:Stanley Burnside.

Related Articles
Moderate denunciation: (articles from the Canadian Churchman).
Editor's Note.
E-Prime, briefly: a lawyer's experiment with writing in E-Prime.
When a win may not mean much.
Theory versus application: does complexity crowd out evidence?

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters