Printer Friendly

Cytoplasmic Localization of WT1 and Decrease of miRNA-16-1 in Nephrotic Syndrome.

1. Introduction

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is one of the most common diseases in children and is characterized by the leakage of large amounts of protein into the urine, lipidemia, hypoalbuminemia, and dysfunction of the glomerular filtration barrier [1]; NS is also a major cause of podocyte injury [2]. Podocytes, highly specialized cells of the visceral epithelium, are found in the glomerular membrane of the kidney [3]; they constitute the terminal part of the ultrafiltration barrier that prevents protein loss, which can result in damage and detachment of podocytes. The reduction of glomerular podocytes in lupus nephritis (LN) patients is correlated with the cumulative loss of urinary podocytes and proteinuria during the progression of kidney disease [2, 4].

Some urinary biomarkers have been found to be associated with injured podocytes in urine sediment, such as podocalyxin (PODXL), nephrin (NPHS1), podocin, and Wilms tumor protein (WT1) [5]. WT1 itself has been found in exosomes in urine sediment, indicating podocyte injury [6].

WT1 is essential for urogenital development, and its expression is limited to mature podocytes [7]. The WT1 gene encodes for a transcription factor that is critical for the development of podocytes and viability; the regulation of podocyte homeostasis occurs via PODXL and NPHS1 [7].

Recent studies have demonstrated that mutations in WT1 can lead to syndromic forms of steroid-resistant NS (SRNS), such as Denys-Drash or Frasier syndrome, and can cause isolated SRNS [8, 9]. Between 10% and 20% of patients fail to respond to steroid therapy; thus, the prognosis for SRNS is usually poor, due to the increased risk of developing end-stage renal disease [10, 11]. Beltcheva et al. reported a case of a pediatric patient with SRNS that was caused by a novel dominant WT1 mutation, C11184A, identified in exon 9 [10]. Mutations within WT1 are frequent causes of sporadic, isolated cases of SRNS in girls [8]. WT1 expression is modulated by microRNAs (miRNAs) [12], which are small (20-25 nucleotides), noncoding RNA molecules that act as posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression in animals and plants, participating in many key biological processes [13]. In the kidney, miRNAs play critical roles in renal development, homeostasis, and physiological function. Several studies have shown that miRNAs are also key mediators of the pathogenesis of various renal diseases [14-16]. Furthermore, miRNAs can be secreted into the extracellular environment and detected in fluids, including urine and serum. They have been proposed as biomarkers for a wide range of diseases [17,18].

Gao et al. discovered that miRNAs 15a and 16-1 may function as tumor suppressors to regulate leukemic cell proliferation, potentially by downregulating the WT1 oncogene [12]; pure curcumin was also recently shown to modulate the expression of WT1, partly by upregulating the expression of miR-15a and miR-16-1 in leukemic cells [19].

In the podocytes of patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), the expression of miR-193a was induced, which in turn inhibited the expression of WT1, modulating the expression of genes critical for podocyte architecture [20]. The presence of miRNAs in plasma, serum, and urine was also shown to be a possible biomarker of diabetic kidney disease [21]. Another mechanism of modulation of WT1 that has been observed in experimental mice during the sepsis is the decrease of nuclear WT1 in podocytes and was associated with transcriptional suppression of nephrin and cause albuminuria [22].

The aim of this study was to determine whether there are different expression levels and protein localization of WT1 in SRNS and SSNS patients and its relationship with the miR-15a, miR-16-1, and miR-193a, which modulate the WT1 expression in other models.

2. Methods

Twenty-one biopsies, serum and urine samples from 11 males and 10 females, from patients diagnosed with NS who met the criteria of International Study of Kidney Disease in Children with proteinuria levels greater than 3.5 g/24 h were included, in the control group serum and urine samples were obtained from 10 subjects without kidney disease, renal biopsies were obtained of autopsy subjects without renal disease who died in accidents as a result of a head injury. Patients who agreed to participate in the study signed a letter of informed consent. This study was performed with patients living in the north-central region from Mexico, according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the ethics committees of our institutions.

2.1. Sample Processing. Freshly urine samples were processed in less than 30 min, and 10 mL of urine was centrifuged for 5 min at 1,500 rpm. After decanting the supernatant, the pellet was resuspended in 1mL PBS-TS (0.1% Tween-20 and 0.02% SDS in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]); 25 [micro]L of which was fixed at 55[degrees]C for 10 min for continued permeabilization as described below.

2.2. Immunofluorescence. As the localization of WT1 is essential for its biological action, WT1 localization was assessed for all samples. For the analysis of the number of podocytes per glomerulus in both NS patients and healthy subjects, WT1 and nephrin were used as biomarkers for immunofluorescence of 4 [micro]m thick sections of renal tissue mounted on microscope slides. The specimens were dewaxed, permeabilized with Triton X-100 (Triton 0.1% with 1% sodium citrate in PBS), and washed three times with PBS. The tissues were blocked with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in PBS for 30 min and incubated for 1h with monoclonal antiWT1 antibody (WT1 [F-6] sc-7585, monoclonal mouse IgG1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or antinephrin monoclonal antibody (H-300 sc-28192, polyclonal rabbit IgG, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1: 100 in 10% FBS in PBS. After washes with PBS, the presence of bound antibody was identified by goat anti-mouse IgG1 Texas Red (sc-2979, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and goat anti-rabbit IgG-FITC (sc-2012, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) staining. Some slides were counterstained with 4',6-diamidino-2phenylindole (DAPI). Finally, the slides were mounted and examined by confocal scanning microscopy. The intensity of the signal was expressed in pixels and analyzed using ImagePro Plus software, version 7.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). The WT1 localization was determined by Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) [23].

2.3. Blood Collection. Five mL whole blood samples from NS patients and healthy controls were collected in tubes (BD Vacutainer; Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) and then processed for obtain the serum by centrifugation at 1,500 rpm for 10 min. The sera were stored at -70[degrees]C until analysis.

2.4. RNA Isolation and Quantification. Total RNA was extracted from patient sera using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two aliquots of 200 [micro]L each were used to obtain sufficient RNA to perform all quality tests. RNA was dissolved in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water, and RNA quality and quantity were determined by spectrophotometry using the NanoDrop ND-1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).

2.5. cDNA Synthesis and Real Time RT-PCR (qPCR) Assay for miRNAs Expression. To determine whether miR-15a, miR-161, and miR-193a are involved in regulating the expression of WT1, their expression was quantified in sera from NS patients and healthy controls. Total RNA was polyadenylated and subjected to reverse transcription using an NCode miRNA First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Real-time qPCR analysis was carried out using SYBR[R] Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA, USA) on an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The primers reported by Gao et al. [12] were used to quantify the relative expression levels of miR-15a, miR-16-1, and miR-193a in the samples. Experiments were performed in triplicate. U6 was used as an endogenous control. The expression of each miRNA relative to U6 RNA was calculated using the equation [2.sup.-[DELTA][DELTA]CT] [24-26].

2.6. RNA Isolation and qPCR for WT1 mRNA Expression. Total RNA was isolated from renal biopsies using the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit and High Pure RNA Paraffin Kit (Roche Life Science, Mexico) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Single-stranded cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription using the miScript Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, United States) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Real-time PCR was performed using the ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with TaqMan gene expression assays. Comparative real-time PCR assays were performed for each sample in triplicate. The primers for WT1F: 5'-TCTGCGGAGCCCAATACAG-3'; WT1-R: 5'-CACATCCTGAATGCCTCTGAAGA-3'; and WT1-P FAM: 5'CACCGTGCGTGTGTATT-TAMRA-3' were used. The comparative quantification cycle threshold (Cq) method was used to determine the relative expression levels of the WT1 gene. The 18S rRNA (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) gene was used for normalization.

2.7. Statistical Analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS17.0 software. The results are presented as theme an [+ or -] SD. Comparisons were made using an analysis of variance and Student's t-test, and the association between miRNA levels and expression of WT1 was assessed by Pearson's correlation statistical program and considered significant at p value less than or equal to 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Description. Twenty-one samples from patients with NS and 10 healthy subjects without renal disease as control group (Table 1) were analyzed for levels of creatinine (0.39 [+ or -] 0.25mg/dL), proteinuria (4.01 [+ or -] 2.7g/24h), cholesterol (207.06 [+ or -] 91.72 mg/dL), triglycerides (141.56 [+ or -] 93.55 mg/dL), and albumin (3.75 [+ or -] 0.83 g/dL). Control renal biopsies were obtained from autopsy subjects without renal disease who died in accidents as a result of a head injury.

3.2. WT1 Localization in Podocytes in NS Patients and Healthy Subjects. Immunofluorescence of renal biopsy tissue using WT1 as a biomarker showed a decrease of 27% in NS patients compared to healthy subjects (Figure 1(a)). The localization of WT1 in SRNS patients was primarily cytoplasmic, whereas WT1 in SSNS patients showed both a nuclear and a cytoplasmic localization while in healthy controls it was mainly nuclear. The localization assay was performed by the colocalization of DAPI (nuclear localization) and Texas Red (WT1), showing a statistically significant difference between SSNS (PPC = 0.51 [+ or -] 0.03) and SRNS (PPC = 0.29 [+ or -] 0.01) patients compared with healthy subjects (PPC = 0.73 [+ or -] 0.02) (p = 0.00001) (Figure 1(c)). In urine sediments of SRNS patients, detached podocytes showed a cytoplasmic localization of WT1 (PPC = 0.35 [+ or -] 0.08) (Figure 1(b)). These results were significantly different from those in healthy subjects (PPC = 0.64 [+ or -] 0.03) (p < 0.0001; Figure 1(d)).

3.3. Analysis of WT1 Expression in Podocytes of NS Patients and Healthy Controls. WT1 expression analysis in podocytes was performed by two methods: immunofluorescence and RT-qPCR. WT1 expression by intensity pixels in renal biopsies of patients with NS was statistically different than healthy controls (p = 0.0001) and between patients with SSNS and SRNS (p = 0.05; Figure 2(a)), with highest levels in healthy controls and lowest levels in SRNS patients. WT1 RNA expression levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR in renal biopsies of NS patients and healthy controls, showing significantly lower (66%) WT1 mRNA levels in NS patients (p = 0.017), indicating a decrease in basal WT1 levels in the podocytes of NS patients (Figure 2(b)).

3.4. Expression of miR-15a, miR-16-1, and miR-193a Levels in Sera from NS Patients. The expression levels of miR-15a ([2.sup.-[DELTA][DELTA]CT]) did not differ between the different groups (SRNS 0.33 [+ or -] 0.12, SSNS 0.91 [+ or -] 0.44, and HS 1.54 [+ or -] 0.54 of relative expression) (p = 0.138; Figure 3(a)) or between patients with SRNS and SSNS compared to the control group (p = 0.31; Figure 3(b)). While the expression of miR-16-1 was significantly lower (0.54 [+ or -] 0.144 relative expression) in the sera of NS patients compared with healthy controls (1.86 [+ or -] 0.82 relative expression) (p = 0.019; Figure 3(c)), there was no difference between SSNS and SRNS patients (p = 0.14; Figure 3(d)). The relative expression of miR-193 ([2.sup.-[DELTA][DELTA]CT]) did not differ between NS patients (2.14 [+ or -] 0.36 relative expression) and controls (2.30 [+ or -] 0.75 relative expression, p = 0.59; Figure 3(e)) or between patients with SRNS and SSNS (p = 0.91; Figure 3(f)).

3.5. Relationship between WT1 and miRNAs. We did not find a significant correlation between WT1 expression and serum concentrations of miR-15a, miR-16-1, and miR-193a in NS patients (miR-15a: r = 0.118, p = 0.882; miR-16-1: r = 0.301, p = 0.969; and miR-193a: r = 0.213, p = 0.787). However, a positive correlation was found between miR-15a and miR-161(r = 0.994, p = 0.006). There was no significant relationship between the particular miRNA levels.

4. Discussion

Epidemiological studies indicate that NS remains the most common manifestation of glomerular disease in childhood, often causing death from untreated infections [27]. The present study reviewed 21 children with NS in the Mexican mestizo population, with an average age of 5.8 years.

Idiopathic NS is one of the most common glomerular diseases in pediatrics. The response to steroids is the best prognostic factor in this disease, and most children with NS respond to corticosteroids. However, 70% of children experience recurrence, with episodes of edema and proteinuria [28]; fewer than 3% of patients with SSNS progress to chronic renal failure compared to 50% patients with SRNS [29].

The WT1 protein has been used as a biomarker of podocyte loss from glomeruli in kidney disease [30, 31] and of the presence of damaged podocytes in urinary sediment [32, 33]. In this work, we clearly observed a reduction of podocytes in renal biopsies of children with NS and the presence of podocytes in the urine, but the reason for such podocyte detachment is not clear. The cause may be an imbalance between different isoforms of WT1 or decreased basal protein expression. Different research groups have observed a decrease in WT1 protein expression in children with SRNS, which was often accompanied by WT1 mutations in exons 8 and 9 [8, 34, 35]. However, another report suggested that reduced expression levels of WT1 cause glomerulonephritis and mesangial sclerosis, depending on the level of the protein [36].

We found normal WT1 expression in the nuclei of podocytes from biopsies of healthy controls without kidney disease; however, in SSNS patients, WT1 expression was localized to both the nucleus and cytoplasm, whereas WT1 expression is primarily cytoplasmic in SRNS patients, suggesting that delocalization of WT1 from the nucleus can lead to a loss of function as a transcription factor. Decreased expression levels of WT1 lead to downregulation of its target genes PODXL (podocalyxin) and NPHS1 (nephrin), as well as several other genes crucial for the architecture of podocytes, initiating a catastrophic collapse of the entire podocyte-stabilizing system [20]. Additionally, Kato et al. [22] observed that in Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treated mice, a loss of albumin decreased nephrin levels and the nuclear localization of WT1 in podocytes. The nuclear localization of WT1, as well as nephrin mRNA and protein levels, returned to near basal levels 72 hours after LPS with recovery of albumin levels [22].

The loss of WT1 gene expression could be a fatal consequence as described above [9]; the regulation of WT1 is provided by certain genes, such as PAX2 and PAX8, or epigenetic modulation mechanisms, such as miRNAs [12, 19]. In addition, WT1 has the ability to self-regulate [37]. In this study, we assessed whether low WT1 expression in podocytes correlates with the circulating levels of miR15a, miR-16-1, and miR-193a in the sera of NS patients. Our results indicate that the expression of miR-15a was higher in healthy controls than in NS patients but was not statistically significant. Similar results were observed for miR16-1, but the difference between the expression of miR-161 in NS patients and in healthy controls was significant, indicating an inverse relationship between miRNAs and WT1 expression. Gao et al. reported that miR-15a and miR-161 inhibit the proliferation of leukemic cells by decreasing WT1 levels via joining expression of these miRNAs inhibits cell proliferation, promotes apoptosis of cancer cells, and suppresses tumorigenicity both in vitro and in vivo [12]. Both miR-15a and miR-16-1 have been shown to negatively aff ct several oncogenes, including BCL2, MCL1, CCND1, and WNT3A. Downregulation of these miRNAs has been reported in chronic lymphocytic lymphoma, pituitary adenoma, and prostatic carcinoma [37, 38], while miR193a was not found to elicit any significant effects on these cancers. However, the data reported by Gebeshuber et al. [20] indicated that miR-193a is involved in FSGS by decreasing WT1 levels. In conclusion, we found low WT1 expression and delocalization in NS patients. We also observed higher expression levels of miR-15a and miR-16-1 in healthy controls compared with NS patients, but only miR-16-1 levels were statistically different. However, we did not find a correlation between miRNA expression and WT1 levels. It is important to extend the search for miRNAs as biomarkers of renal diseases as well as to understand the basic mechanisms of gene regulation of podocytes and the glomerular filtration system.

Disclosure

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Competing Interests

The authors report no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial and infrastructure support of the Laboratorio de Inmunologia y Virologia de la Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9531074

References

[1] C. Mace and S. S. Chugh, "Nephrotic syndrome: components, connections, and angiopoietin-like 4-related therapeutics," Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2393-2398, 2014.

[2] A. Bierzynska, K. Soderquest, and A. Koziell, "Genes and podocytes--new insights into mechanisms of podocytopathy," Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 5, article no. 226, 2014.

[3] L. Lasagni and P. Romagnani, "Basic research: podocyte progenitors and ectopic podocytes," Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 715-716, 2013.

[4] A. Sinha and A. Bagga, "Nephrotic syndrome," Indian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 1045-1055, 2012.

[5] M. Sekulic and S. Pichler Sekulic, "A compendium of urinary biomarkers indicative of glomerular podocytopathy," Pathology Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 782395, 18 pages, 2013.

[6] H. Zhou, H. Kajiyama, T. Tsuji et al., "Urinary exosomal wilms' tumor-1 as a potential biomarker for podocyte injury," American Journal of Physiology--Renal Physiology, vol. 305, no. 4, pp. F553-F559, 2013.

[7] J. Bariety, C. Mandet, G. S. Hill, and P. Bruneval, "Parietal podocytes in normalhuman glomeruli," Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2770-2780, 2006.

[8] Y. H. Yang, F. Zhao, D. N. Feng et al., "Wilms' tumor suppressor gene mutations in girls with sporadic isolated steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome," Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 6184-6191, 2013.

[9] D. N. Feng, Y. H. Yang, D. J. Wang et al., "Mutational analysis of podocyte genes in children with sporadic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome," Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 9514-9522, 2014.

[10] O. Beltcheva, A. Boueva, E. Morgunova et al., "Novel mutation in Wilms' tumour 1 gene associated with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome," NDT Plus, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17-19, 2011.

[11] B. Mucha, F. Ozaltin, B. G. Hinkes et al., "Mutations in the Wilms' tumor 1 gene cause isolated steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome and occur in exons 8 and 9," Pediatric Research, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 325-331, 2006.

[12] S.-M. Gao, C.-Y. Xing, C.-Q. Chen, S.-S. Lin, P.-H. Dong, and F.-J. Yu, "MiR-15a and miR-16-1 inhibit the proliferation of leukemic cells by down-regulating WT1 protein level," Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 30, no. 1, article 110, 2011.

[13] J. Hou and D. Zhao, "MicroRNA regulation in renal pathophysiology," International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 13078-13092, 2013.

[14] A. C.-K. Chung and H. Y. Lan, "MicroRNAs in renal fibrosis," Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 6, article no. 50, 2015.

[15] H. Wang, Z. Hu, and L. Chen, "Decreased serum miR-503 level in children with nephrotic syndrome," Clinical Laboratory, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1917-1926, 2015.

[16] M. Rudnicki, P. Perco, B. D'haene et al., "Renal microRNA- and RNA-profiles in progressive chronic kidney disease," European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 213-226,2016.

[17] P. Tiberio, M. Callari, V. Angeloni, M. G. Daidone, and V Appierto, "Challenges in using circulating miRNAs as cancer biomarkers," BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 731479, 10 pages, 2015.

[18] A. Ramezani, J. M. Devaney, S. Cohen et al., "Circulating and urinary microRNA profile in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a pilot study," European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 394-404, 2015.

[19] S.-M. Gao, J.-J. Yang, C.-Q. Chen et al., "Pure curcumin decreases the expression of WT1 by upregulation of miR-15a and miR-16-1 in leukemic cells," Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 31, no. 1, article no. 27, 2012.

[20] C. A. Gebeshuber, C. Kornauth, L. Dong et al., "Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is induced by microRNA-193a and its downregulation of WT1," Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 481-487, 2013.

[21] R. Li, A. C. K. Chung, X. Yu, and H. Y. Lan, "MicroRNAs in diabetic kidney disease," International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2014, Article ID 593956, 11 pages, 2014.

[22] T. Kato, S. Mizuno, and M. Kamimoto, "The decreases of nephrin and nuclear WT1 in podocytes may cause albuminuria during the experimental sepsis in mice," Biomedical Research, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 363-369, 2010.

[23] K. W. Dunn, M. M. Kamocka, and J. H. McDonald, "A practical guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy," American Journal of Physiology--Cell Physiology, vol. 300, no. 4, pp. C723-C742, 2011.

[24] W. Sui, H. Lin, H. Li, Q. Yan, J. Chen, and Y. Dai, "Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for nephrotic syndrome," Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 371-376, 2014.

[25] J. L. Te, I. M. Dozmorov, J. M. Guthridge et al., "Identification of unique MicroRNA signature associated with lupus nephritis," PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID e10344, 2010.

[26] M. W. Pfaffl, "A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR," Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, no. 9, article e45, 2001.

[27] E. M. Hodson, N. S. Willis, and J. C. Craig, "Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children," Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online), no. 4, p. CD001533, 2007.

[28] S. N. Uwaezuoke, "Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children: triggers of relapse and evolving hypotheses on pathogenesis," Italian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 41, article no 19, 2015.

[29] P. Niaudet, "Steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children," in Pediatric Nephrology, E. D. Avner, W. E. Harmon, and P. Niaudet, Eds., vol. 2004, pp. 557-574, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2004.

[30] J. J. Bollain, M. Gonzalez, F. Torres et al., "Increased excretion of urinary podocytes in lupus nephritis," Indian Journal of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 166-171, 2011.

[31] H. Ohsaki, T. Sofue, K. Kawakami et al., "WT1 immunoenzyme staining using SurePath[TM] processed urine cytology helps to detect kidney disease," Cytopathology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 43-49, 2016.

[32] F. Barutta, M. Tricarico, A. Corbelli et al., "Urinary exosomal MicroRNAs in incipient diabetic nephropathy," PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e73798, 2013.

[33] H. Zhou, H. Kajiyama, T. Tsuji et al., "Urinary exosomal Wilms' tumor-1 as a potential biomarker for podocyte injury," American Journal of Physiology--Renal Physiology, vol. 305, no. 4, pp. F553-F559, 2013.

[34] S. Joshi, R. Andersen, B. Jespersen, and S. Rittig, "Genetics of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a review of mutation spectrum and suggested approach for genetic testing," Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 844-856, 2013.

[35] R. G. Ruf, M. Schultheiss, A. Lichtenberger et al., "Prevalence of WT1 mutations in a large cohort of patients with steroidresistant and steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome," Kidney International, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 564-570, 2004.

[36] J.-K. Guo, A. L. Menke, M.-C. Gubler et al., "WT1 is a key regulator of podocyte function: reduced expression levels cause crescentic glomerulonephritis and mesangial sclerosis," Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 651-659, 2002.

[37] J. M. Siehl, E. Thiel, K. Heufelder et al., "Possible regulation of Wilms' tumour gene 1 (WT1) expression by the paired box genes PAX2 and PAX8 and by the haematopoietic transcription factor GATA-1 in human acute myeloid leukaemias," British Journal of Haematology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 235-242, 2003.

[38] R. I. Aqeilan, G. A. Calin, and C. M. Croce, "MiR-15a and miR16-1 in cancer: discovery, function and future perspectives," Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 215-220, 2010.

Pablo Zapata-Benavides, (1) Mariela Arellano-Rodriguez, (1,2) Juan Jose Bollain-y-Goytia, (2) Moises Armides Franco-Molina, (1) Gloria Azucena Rangel-Ochoa, (3) Esperanza Avalos-Diaz, (2) Rafael Herrera-Esparza, (2) and Cristina Rodriguez-Padilla (1)

(1) Departamento de Microbiologia e Inmunologia, Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon (UANL), 66450 San Nicolas de los Garza, NL, Mexico

(2) Laboratorios de Inmunologia y Biologia Molecular, Unidad Acadamica de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas (UAZ), 98040 Zacatecas, ZAC, Mexico

(3) Hospital General Zacatecas "Luz Gonzalez Cosio", Ciudad Gobierno, 98160 Zacatecas, ZAC, Mexico

Correspondence should be addressed to Pablo Zapata-Benavides; pablozapata@hotmail.com

Received 11 September 2016; Revised 9 January 2017; Accepted 23 January 2017; Published 19 February 2017

Academic Editor: Jae I. Shin

Caption: Figure 1: WT1 expression and localization in podocytes from biopsies and urinary sediments of patients with NS. (a) Immunofluorescence of renal biopsies (magnification, x40) of patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS). (b) Immunofluorescence of podocytes in urine sediments: nephrin detection was used as a second marker of podocytes (magnification, x40). (c) Colocalization of DAPI and Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) in nucleus/cytoplasm of podocytes in kidney biopsies. (d) Colocalization of DAPI and WT1 in nucleus/cytoplasm of podocytes in urinary sediments. The colocalization was determined by Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

Caption: Figure 2: WT1 expression in podocytes from renal biopsies of patients with NS. (a) WT1 expression immunofluorescence. HS: healthy subjects; SSNS: steroid-sensitive NS; and SRNS: steroid-resistant NS. WT1 expression was measured by pixel intensity. (b) Relative expression levels of WT1 by real-time PCR. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

Caption: Figure 3: Expression of miR-15a, miR-16-1, and miR-193a in sera from patients with NS. Relative expression levels of miR-15a (a) in patients with NS (nephrotic syndrome) and healthy subjects (HS) and (b) in patients with steroid-sensitive NS (SSNS) and steroid- resistant NS (SRNS). miR-16-1 (c) in patients with NS and HS and (d) in patients with SSNS and SRNS and miR-193a (e) in patients with NS and HS and (f) in patients with SSNS and SRNS.* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Table 1: Description of NS patients and controls.

             Age            Gender     %        Treatment    %

Nephrotic    5.58 (range    Males      52       SSNS         68.75
syndrome      2-12 years)   Females    48       SRNS

Healthy      9 (range       Males      30.77    No           31.25
subjects     3-12 years)    Females    69.23    treatment

             Proteinuria

Nephrotic    4.01
syndrome     g/24h

Healthy      <0.3
subjects     g/L

SSNS: steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome;
SRNS: steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Zapata-Benavides, Pablo; Arellano-Rodriguez, Mariela; Bollain-y-Goytia, Juan Jose; Franco-Molina, Mo
Publication:BioMed Research International
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2017
Words:4513
Previous Article:Overexpression of MicroRNA-145 Ameliorates Astrocyte Injury by Targeting Aquaporin 4 in Cerebral Ischemic Stroke.
Next Article:Treatment with Sildenafil and Donepezil Improves Angiogenesis in Experimentally Induced Critical Limb Ischemia.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters