Printer Friendly

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in epithelial neoplasms and its relevance as a targeted therapy in dogs/Expressao de ciclooxigenase-2 em neoplasias epiteliais e sua relevancia como terapia alvo em caes.

An emergent tendency in cancer research is related to rational design and usage of drugs, in which it is necessary to identify a therapeutic target. Treatment randomness is no longer accepted within this tendency (PEEK, 2004).

Cyclooxygenase (COX) is a class of catalytic enzymes that promote aracdonic acid conversion into a variety of prostaglandins (BEAM et al., 2003). Prostaglandins have important functions in almost all systems and regulate physiologic processes related to immunity, reproduction, vascular tonus and integrity, nerve growth and development, and bone metabolism. These proteins are synthesized in a great variety of tissues acting as an autocrine or paracrine mediator in microenvironment signaling (GUPTA, 2001). Prostaglandins may pathologically contribute for the development of cancer through several mechanisms: increasing cellular proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis, modifying carcinogen metabolism or modulating the immune system (FISHER, 1997).

COX-2 expression may be related to its mechanism in tumoral promotion and progression phases during carcinogenesis. Therefore, it may be considered a poor prognostic factor in many neoplastic histologic types (MUTSAERS, 2013). COX-2 action in tumor progression is associated with inhibition of apoptosis, increase in cellular proliferation and angiogenesis, and enhanced tumoral invasiveness (MUTSAERS, 2013; CASSALI et al., 2014). COX-2 expression may be considered a potential predictive factor because of the possible associations of selective COX-2 inhibitors in adjuvant treatments (targeted therapy). Although the duration of treatment is still empirical, it is known that it should be prolonged, since COX-2 selective inhibitors are capable of inhibiting receptor activation, but do not show any effect in receptor expression (LAVALLE et al., 2009).

This scientific communication has the goal to report COX-2 expression in seven canine epithelial neoplasms and adjuvant treatment with selective COX-2 inhibitors. Therefore, seven canine patients with early stage malignant epithelial neoplasms whose tumors showed high COX-2 expression were included in this study.

Age, breed, tumor location, stage, surgical margins, diagnosis, COX-2 score, and treatment duration with selective COX-2 inhibitor for each patient are listed in table 1. All patients underwent surgery for tumor resection. Tumors were fixed in buffered 10% formalin and sent to histopathology and COX-2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis.

Histopathology diagnoses were squamous cell carcinoma (three cases), basal cell carcinoma, perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma, hepatoid carcinoma, and apocrine carcinoma with squamous differentiation.

Immunohistochemistry was performed using a primary rabbit monoclonal anti-human COX-2 antibody (SP21, 1 : 20, Lab Vision, Freemont, CA), as described by LAVALLE et al. (2009). Sections from a human colon carcinoma known to express COX-2 were used as positive controls for COX-2, and negative controls were obtained with suppression of the primary antibody. According to LAVALLE et al. (2009), COX-2 IHC assessment was semi-quantitative; the distribution score was defined by the percentage estimate of positive cells in five high-power fields (400x magnification). Final score, from 0 to 12, was determined by the product of distribution and intensity values. For distribution, scores ranged from zero to four--zero for 0% of stained cells; one for 1% to 10% of stained cells; two for 11% to 30% of stained cells; three for 31% to 60% of stained cells; and four for more than 61% of stained cells. For intensity, scores ranged from zero to three--zero for no staining; one for weak staining; two for moderate staining; and three for strong staining.

Five patients were treated with selective COX-2 inhibitor; four of them received firocoxib (Previcox[R]), orally, in a daily dose of 5mg[kg.sup.-1]. The patient with basal cell carcinoma received mavacoxib (Trocoxil[R]), orally, 2mg[kg.sup.-1] every 14 days and every 30 days after the second dose. Two patients were treated with electrochemotherapy only.

Follow-up included physical exams, complete blood counts, and biochemistry analyses every 30 days. No significant changes were seen in the exams. Two animals treated with firocoxib presented vomit, anorexia, diarrhea, and dark stool. Their treatments were discontinued, with resolution of clinical signs. Currently, treated patients are healthy, with disease free interval and overall survival time over one year.

Collective evidence in human, animal, and cell culture studies clearly indicates that targeted inhibition of COX-2 is a viable approach for cancer prevention and treatment (PEEK, 2004). Cyclooxygenase inhibitors efficacy was demonstrated with palliative goal in dogs with transitional cell carcinomas (CHUN & THAMM, 2013) and inoperable squamous cell carcinomas (SCHMIDT et al., 2001), but with curative intent after chemotherapy in patients with inflammatory carcinomas (CAMPOS et al., 2011) and advanced stage mammary carcinomas (LAVALLE et al., 2009).

According to LAVALLE et al. (2012), selective COX-2 inhibitors may benefit patients with high (6-12) COX-2 immunohistochemistry scores. Early stage carcinoma and a high COX-2 score seen in most patients in this study qualified them as candidates for targeted therapy with selective COX-2 inhibitors, not for chemotherapy.

Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) side effects are based on their pharmacological mechanism of action. NSAIDs act mainly through the inhibition of COX activity in the biochemical cascade that leads to prostaglandin synthesis, and there are selective NSAIDs for COX-2 inhibition (KHWANJAI et al., 2011). COX-1 and COX-2 are involved in renal blood flow and tubular function regulation; therefore, selective COX-2 NSAIDs do not necessarily cause less renal side effects. In this study, renal function was monitored with monthly evaluation of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, to detect early signs of renal impairment. COX selectivity is related only to the potential to reduce gastrointestinal (GI) side effects in healthy tissues and there is no association with renal or hepatic adverse effects, nor with effects in altered GI tract (KUKANICH et al., 2012). Side effects seen in two patients in this study are probably related to preexisting gastrointestinal disease, worsened with the usage of NSAID.

COX-2 immunohistochemistry score may be a prognostic and predictive factor in veterinary medicine, and COX-2 expression was demonstrated in different canine epithelial neoplasms, in this study. However, more studies are needed to determine the benefit of using selective COX-2 inhibitors for the adjuvant treatment of patients with advanced stage disease.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150794

REFERENCES

BEAM, S.L. et al. An immunohistochemical study ofcyclooxygenase-2 expression in various feline neoplasms. Veterinary Pathology, v.40, p.496-500, 2003. Available from: <http://vet.sagepub.com/content/40/5/496.full.pdf>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014. doi: 10.1354/vp.40-5-496.

CAMPOS, L.C. et al. Carboplatina e inibidor de Cox-2 no tratamento do carcinoma inflamatorio de mama em cadela--relato de caso. Cllnlea Veterinaria, v. 16, p.72-76, 2011.

CASSALI, G.D. et al. Consensus for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of canine mammary tumors. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Pathology, v. 7, p.38-69, 2014. Available from: <http://www.abpv.vet.br/upload/documentos/DOWNLOAD-FULL-ARTICLE-29-20881_2011_7_11_14_42.pdf>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014.

CHUN, R.; THAMM, D.H. Targeting angiogenesis and tumor vasculature. In: WITHROW, S.J.; MACEWEN, E.G. Withrow and MacEwen's small animal clinical oncology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2013. Cap.14, p.259-266.

FISHER, S.M. Prostaglandins and cancer. Frontiers in Bioscience, v.2, p.482-500, 1997. Available from: <https://www.bioscience.org/1997/v2/d/fischer/fischer.pdf>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014. doi: d482-500.

GUPTA, R.A.; DUBOIS, R.N. Colorectal cancer prevention and treatment by inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2. Nature Reviews Cancer, v.1, p.11-21, 2001. Available from: <http://www.nature. com/nrc/journal/v1/n1/full/nrc1001-011a.html>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014. doi: 10.1038/35094017.

KHWANJAI, V. et al. Evaluating the effects of 14-day oral vedaprofen and tolfenamic acid treatment on renal function, hematological and biochemical profiles in healthy cats. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, v.35, p. 13-18, 2011. Available from: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/21392038>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014. doi: 10.1111/ j.1365-2885.2011.01282.

KUKANICH, B. et al. Clinical pharmacology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v.39, p.69-90, 2012. Available from: <http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151877>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00675.x.

LAVALLE, G.E. et al. Cox-2 expression in canine mammary carcinomas: correlation with angiogenesis and overall survival. Veterinary Pathology, v.6, p.1275-1280, 2009. Available from: <http://vet.sagepub.com/content/46/6/1275.full.pdf>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014. doi: 10.1354/vp.08-VP-0226-C-FL.

LAVALLE, G.E. et al. Canine malignant mammary gland neoplasms with advanced clinical staging treated with carboplatin and cyclooxygenase inhibitors. In Vivo, v.26, p.375-380, 2012. Available from: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/22523289>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014.

MUTSAERS, A.J. Antiangiogenic and metronomic therapy. In: WITHROW, S.J.; MACEWEN, E.G. Withrow and MacEwen's small animal clinical oncology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2013. Cap.14, p.229-237.

PEEK, R.M. Prevention of colorectal cancer through the use of COX-2 selective inhibitors. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, v.54, p.50-56, 2004. Available from: <http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15309515>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014.

SCHMIDT, B.R. et al. Evaluation of piroxicam for the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, v.218, p.1783-1786, 2001. Available from: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/11394830>. Accessed: Sept. 19, 2014.

Rubia Monteiro de Castro Cunha (1) * Rodrigo dos Santos Horta (1) Gleidice Eunice Lavalle (1) Roberto Baracat Araujo (1)

(1) Departmento de Clinica e Cirurgia Veterinaria, Escola de Veterinaria, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, CP 567, 30161-970, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. E-mail: rubiamcc@gmail.com. * Corresponding author.

Received 06.01.15 Approved 11.04.15 Returned by the author 03.10.16 CR-2015-0794.R2
Table 1--Histological type and COX-2 score for each patient
(canine). T1 -tumor <2cm; T3 -tumor >5cm; N0 -no evidence of
regional lymph node involvement; M0 -no evidence of distant
metastasis.

Breed                Age     Tumor            Staging   Surgical
                   (years)   location                   margins

Boxer                12      Perianal         T1N0M0    Compromised

Poodle                9      Perianal         T1N0M0    Adequate
Golden Retriever     12      Left shoulder    T1N0M0    Adequate
Poodle               16      Left upper lip   T1N0M0    Adequate

Crossbreed            7      Prepuce          T3N0M0    Compromised
English Bulldog      11      Prepuce          T1N0M0    Compromised
Crossbreed            1      Face             T1N0M0    Compromised

Breed              Diagnosis                   COX-2    Selective
                                               score      COX-2
                                               (0-12)   inhibitor
                                                        treatment
                                                        duration
                                                        (months)

Boxer              Perianal mucinous             6          6
                     adenocarcinoma
Poodle             Hepatoid carcinoma            4          1
Golden Retriever   Squamous cell carcinoma       6          2
Poodle             Apocrine carcinoma with       4          3
                     squamous diferentiation
Crossbreed         Squamous cell carcinoma       4         --
English Bulldog    Squamouscell carcinoma        6         --
Crossbreed         Basal cell carcinoma          6          4
COPYRIGHT 2016 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:patologia; texto en ingles
Author:Cunha, Rubia Monteiro de Castro; Horta, Rodrigo dos Santos; Lavalle, Gleidice Eunice; Araujo, Robert
Publication:Ciencia Rural
Date:Jun 1, 2016
Words:1706
Previous Article:Nitrogen dose and type of herbicide used for growth regulation on the green coloration intensity of Emerald grass/Intensidade da coloracao verde das...
Next Article:Growth of silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) exposed to acidic pH at different humic acid levels/Crescimento de jundias (Rhamdia quelen) expostos ao pH...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |