Printer Friendly

Cultivation of forage sorghum varieties irrigated with saline effluent from fish-farming under semiarid conditions/Cultivo de variedades de sorgo forrageiro irrigado com efluente salino da piscicultura em condicoes semiaridas.

INTRODUCTION

The Brazilian semiarid region is characterized by low rainfall and high evaporative demand; hence, the multiple use of water is an important strategy for the sustainability of water resources. One alternative of subsistence for small cattle farmers in these regions, where the only source of water resources destined to irrigation is often a saline water table (Reboucas, 1999), is the use of integrated systems between agriculture and aquaculture.

In systems that use saline water for irrigation, the application of water depths that guarantee the leaching of part of the salts in the soil is fundamental to reduce salinity close to the plant root system. Thus, the challenge to obtain a good yield is the definition of an ideal water volume that guarantees such leaching and creates a comfortable environment for root development (Araguesa et al., 2014).

Some studies conducted with forage and vegetable crops cultivated with water from fish- and shrimp-farming tanks, supplied with saline water, have shown promising results (Carvalho Junior et al., 2010; Gurgel et al., 2012; Simoes et al., 2016). Among these crops, sorghum shows great production potential for cultivation under saline water and is considered as moderately tolerant to salinity (Dias & Blanco, 2010).

This crop stands out as a good forage for the Brazilian semiarid region for being typical of hot climate, with xerophytic characteristics, low demand in soil fertility, easy cultivation and fast establishment and growth, besides a good nutritional value and high forage production (Botelho et al., 2010; Gomes et al., 2006; Santos et al., 2013).

Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the cultivation of varieties of forage sorghum subjected to leaching fractions using saline fish-farming effluent under semiarid conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The experiment was conducted at the Caatinga Experimental Field of Embrapa Semi-arid, in Petrolina-PE, Brazil, in the region of the Submiddle Sao Francisco (9[degrees] 8' 8.9" S; 40[degrees] 18' 33.6" W; 373 m), from February to July 2013. The soil in the experimental area was classified as Red Yellow Argisol (EMBRAPA, 2006), with medium texture and flat relief. The climate in the region is classified as semiarid, BSwh' During the experimental period, the relative air humidity was 63.86% and the temperature was around 25.46 [degrees]C. The maximum daily evapotranspiration observed was 6.97 mm, with mean of 5.85 mm [d.sup.-1]. The main rainfall events were concentrated in the first ten days after planting (DAP) and at 74 DAP, totaling 32.7 mm until the end of the cycle. The electrical conductivity of the irrigation water from fish-farming effluent showed a stable behavior, with mean of 2.5 dS [m.sup.-1].

The experiment was set in a randomized block design, with four blocks, in split plots composed of three varieties of forage sorghum: 'Volumax' 'F305' and 'Sudao', and four leaching fractions (LF): 0, 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15, with saline fish-farming effluent; the leaching fractions corresponded to the plots and the varieties to the subplots. Each experimental unit (subplot) consisted of five 5-m-long rows, 0.5 m apart, with 10 plants per linear meter.

The experimental area was prepared according to the needs of the crop. Basal fertilization was performed based on the analysis of a previously collected soil sample (Table 1), applying 30 kg [ha.sup.-1] of nitrogen, 60 kg [ha.sup.-1] of phosphorus and 20 kg [ha.sup.-1] of potassium (Cavalcanti, 2008). At 30 DAP, a top-dressing nitrogen fertilization was performed using 30 kg [ha.sup.-1]. Sowing was performed in April 2013 and emergence occurred at 7 DAP.

Irrigation was performed daily through a surface drip system, using drippers with flow rate of 1.6 L [h.sup.-1], nominal diameter (ND) of 16 mm and spaced at 0.30 m. Irrigation water came from 5-[m.sup.3] fish-farming tanks, containing black tilapia at a population density of 50 fish per cubic meter. In the management of the tanks, 50% of water was daily changed and destined to the irrigation of the experiment. The tanks were supplied with saline water from an artesian well 900 m distant from the experimental area, with electrical conductivity of 2.57 dS [m.sup.-1] ([+ or -] 0.2).

The chemical characteristics of the irrigation water from fish farming were determined in weekly evaluations during the experiment and the mean values are shown in Table 2.

The water depths applied through irrigation were calculated according to the crop evapotranspiration (ETo*Kc*Kl), measured in the period between irrigations, based on the water application efficiency of the system and the tested leaching fractions, as in Eq. 1.

Li = (ETo * Kc * Kl)-P/Eff. (1+ LF) (1)

where:

Li--irrigation depth, mm;

ETo--evapotranspiration measured in the period, mm;

Kc--crop coefficient;

Kl--location coefficient;

P--rainfall measured in the period, mm;

Eff--irrigation system efficiency, 0.9; and,

LF--applied leaching fraction, decimal.

Harvest was performed in July, when the organs of the central portion of the panicle showed a pasty-to-farinaceous aspect. At harvest, soil samples were collected in the wet strip in the layers of 0-5, 5-20, 20-40, 40-60 and 60-80 cm for the determination of electrical conductivity, using the saturation paste extract of each layer. The plants of each plot were cut at a height of 10 cm from the soil and the following parameters were evaluated: fresh matter, number of leaves, length and width of the +3 leaf; plant height and stem diameter. Then, the material was dried in an oven at 60 [degrees]C until constant weight, for the determination of dry matter.

Leaf blade samples were ground in a knife mill and subjected to nitric-perchloric digestion for the determination of [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] through flame photometry (Malavolta et al., 1997).

The obtained data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the program Sisvar 5.0. First- and seconddegree regression models were used for the comparison between leaching fractions, when significant at 0.01 or 0.05 probability level. Tukey test at 0.05 probability level was adopted for the comparison between the varieties.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The highest leaching fractions promoted lower values of electrical conductivity of the saturation extract (ECe) in the soil profile, gradually reducing the concentration of salts as the leaching fractions increased. This fact corroborates the results of Simoes et. al. (2016), who irrigated beet also with saline fish-farming effluent. This is due to displacement of salts in the wet bulb through mass flow. The highest concentrations of salts were observed in the layer of 0-5 cm, with ECe values of 10.34 and 11.6 dS [m.sup.-1] for the leaching fractions of 5 and 0%, respectively (Table 3).

Higher values of electrical conductivity in the upper soil layers were also observed in the cultivation of beet (Ferreira et al., 2006; Simoes et al., 2016) and peanut (Santos et al., 2012) subjected to leaching fractions with saline water.

Considering that approximately 80% of the effective root system of sorghum is found in the soil layer of 0-30 cm (Magalhaes et al., 2000), the 0.15 leaching fraction resulted in greater reduction of salts in this layer and its electrical conductivity was lower than 4.0 dS [m.sup.-1]. Since this ECe value is adopted as a limit, to avoid the general negative effects on plant development (Dias & Blanco, 2010), it is evident the viability of sorghum cultivation using water of 2.57 dS [m.sup.-1] along with the application of a leaching fraction of 0.15.

There was no significant interaction between the varieties and the applied leaching fractions with respect to plant height. The varieties 'Sudao' and 'F305' showed greater values of plant height compared with 'Volumax, and the variety 'F305' showed higher number of leaves (Table 4). There was no significant difference for stem diameter (0) between the studied varieties. As to plant biometry, the leaves of 'Sudao' sorghum were longer, but narrower, in comparison to 'Volumax' and 'F305'

The variety 'Sudao' showed the highest fresh matter yield, significantly differing from 'Volumax'. For dry matter, the variety 'F305' showed the highest and 'Volumax' the lowest yields (Table 4). 'Volumax', in different environments and under irrigation with non-saline water, showed mean dry matter yields from 6.8 to 10.54 t [ha.sup.-1] (Avelino et al., 2011; Gomes et al., 2006) and the variety 'F305' showed dry matter yield of 9.77 t [ha.sup.-1], also in a non-saline environment (Moraes et al., 2013).

The reduction in dry matter yield due to the application of leaching fractions was expected, since it is a typical response of plants to saline stress, resulting from the decrease in soil osmotic potential and the toxic effects of the accumulation of [Na.sup.+] and [Cl.sup.+], which promote physiological disorders in the plant.

Reduction in sorghum yield due to salinity has been reported in various studies and its magnitude depends on ECe, edaphoclimatic conditions etc. The variety 'Volumax, when cultivated under 12.5 dS [m.sup.-1], showed a reduction of more than 40% in the accumulation of fresh and dry matter (Coelho et al., 2014); the variety 'Sudao' subjected to 100 mM with NaCl, in a greenhouse, showed reduction of 60% in dry matter production (Feijao et al., 2011) and the genotypes CSF 18 and CSF 20 showed reductions of 23 and 8%, respectively, when subjected to 5.8 dS [m.sup.-1] under field conditions, which represent estimated decreases of 0.34 and 0.12 kg of dry matter per square meter (Vieira et al., 2005). The tolerance index of the shoots in two forage sorghum genotypes subjected to electrical conductivity of 6.0 dS [m.sup.-1] showed a reduction from 29 to 40% (Aquino et al., 2007).

The increment of leaching fractions promoted a directly proportional increase in plant height, stem diameter and fresh and dry matter yields of sorghum plants. Such behavior was best represented by first-degree equations (Figure 1).

Fresh and dry matter yields of the forage sorghum varieties showed maximum of 27.51 and 9.09 t [ha.sup.-1], respectively, when a leaching fraction of 15% was applied, which corresponds to an increment of approximately 25% (Figure 1). The increase in yield due to the application of leaching fractions with saline water was also observed in cowpea (Assis Junior et al., 2007), peanut (Santos et al., 2012) and beet (Simoes et al., 2016). On the other hand, it is important to note that high leaching fractions may cause reduction in crop yield, for reducing the concentration of both potentially toxic ions and ions indispensable for plant mineral nutrition, as observed in the weight of corn grains grown under irrigation with saline water (3.3 dS [m.sup.-1]) and leaching fraction of 20% (Carvalho et al., 2012).

As to sodium ([Na.sup.+]) content, there was a parabolic behavior for the three varieties (Table 5). The varieties 'Volumax' and 'F305' showed increase in [Na.sup.+] contents, with maximum values in plants subjected to 0.05 leaching fraction, while 'Sudao' showed higher [Na.sup.+] content when a 0.15 leaching fraction was applied.

In general, there were lower contents of potassium ([K.sup.+]) at the highest leaching fractions (Table 5), due to the greater leaching of salts in the soil, as expected. The variety 'Sudao' showed the highest [K.sup.+] content at the leaching fraction of 15% (9.88 g [kg.sup.-1]), while the others showed a value of approximately 5.5 g [kg.sup.-1], which evidences the deficiency of this element (Coelho et al., 2002). It should be pointed out that, with the leaching fraction of 0.15, all genotypes obtained the highest fresh and dry matter yields, as well as the lowest soil electrical conductivity (ECe). At this same leaching fraction, the highest content of [Na.sup.+] occurred in the variety 'Sudao' and it was almost twice that of the others.

Considering that the variety 'Sudao' stands out for the highest fresh matter yield and for being in the group of highest dry matter yield and leaf area, its higher capacity of acclimation is evident. This behavior suggests its ability to compartmentalize the [Na.sup.+] present in the leaf blade, whether in the vacuole or in the apoplast, avoiding its accumulation in the cytoplasm and organelles, which would result in metabolic disorders and, consequently, reduction in crop performance (Plett & Moller, 2010).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

CONCLUSIONS

1. It is viable to cultivate forage sorghum in the Brazilian semiarid region under irrigation with saline water from fishfarming tanks, with mean electrical conductivity of 2.57 dS [m.sup.-1], and application of a leaching fraction of 0.15.

2. The variety 'Volumax' is more sensitive to salinity in comparison to 'F305' and 'Sudao', since it showed lower shoot growth and low values of leaf area, fresh matter and dry matter.

Literature Cited

Aquino, A. J. S.; Lacerda, C. F. de; Gomes Filho, E. Crescimento, particao de materia seca e retencao de [Na.sup.+], [K.sup.+] e [Cl.sup.-] em dois genotipos de sorgo irrigados com aguas salinas. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, v.31, p.961-971, 2007. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0100-06832007000500013

Araguesa, R.; Medina, E. T.; Claveria, I.; Martinez-Cobb, A.; Faci, J. Regulated deficit irrigation, soil salinization and soil sodification in a table grape vineyard drip-irrigated with moderately saline waters. Agricultural Water Management. v.134, p.84-93, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.11.019

Assis Junior, J. O.; Lacerda, C. F. de; Silva, C. F.; Silva, F. L. B.; Bezerra, M. A.; Gheyi, H. R. Produtividade do feijao-de-corda e acumulo de sais no solo em Funcao da fracao de lixiviacao e da salinidade da agua de Irrigacao. Engenharia Agricola, v.27, p.702-713, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162007000400013

Avelino, P. M.; Neiva, J. N. M.; Araujo, V. L.; Alexandrino, E.; Santos, A. C.; Restle, J. Caracteristicas agronomicas e estruturais de hibridos de sorgo em funcao de diferentes densidades de plantio. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v.42, p.534-541, 2011. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S1806-66902011000200037

Botelho, P. R. F.; Pires, D. A. A.; Sales, E. C. J.; Rocha Junior, V R.; Reis, S. T. Avaliacao de genotipos de sorgo em primeiro corte e rebrota para producao de silagem. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, v.9, p.287-297, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.18512/19806477/rbms.v9n3p287-297

Carvalho, J. F. de; Tsimpho, C. J.; Silva, E. F. de F. e; Medeiros, P R. F. de; Santos, M. H. V. dos; Santos, A. N. dos. Producao e biometria do milho verde irrigado com agua salina sob fracoes de lixiviacao. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.16, p.368-374, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1415-43662012000400006

Carvalho Junior, S. B. de; Furtado, D. A.; Silva, V. R. da; Dantas, R. T.; Lima, I. S. P; Lima, V. L. A. de. Producao e avaliacao bromatologica de especies forrageiras irrigadas com agua salina. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v. 14, p. 1045-1051, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662010001000004

Cavalcanti, F J. de A. Recomendacoes de adubacao para o estado de Pernambuco. 2a Apr. 3.ed., Recife: IPA, 2008. 212p.

Coelho, A. M.; Waquil, J. M.; Karam, D.; Casela, C. R.; Ribas, P M. Seja o doutor do seu sorgo. Informacoes Agronomicas, n.100, p.1-12, 2002.

Coelho, D. S.; Simoes, W. L.; Mendes, A. M. S.; Dantas, B. F.; Rodrigues, J. A. S.; Souza, M. A. Germinacao e crescimento inicial de variedades de sorgo forrageiro submetidas ao estresse salino. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v. 18, p.2530, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662014000100004

Dias, N. da S.; Blanco, F. F. Efeitos dos sais no solo e na planta. In: Gheyi, H. R.; Dias, N. da S.; Lacerda, C. F. de. Manejo da salinidade na agricultura: Estudo basico e aplicados. Fortaleza: INCT Sal, 2010. p.129-140.

EMBRAPA--Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. Sistema brasileiro de classificacao de solos. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro: EMBRAPA, 2006. 412p.

Feijao, A. R.; Silva, J. C. B.; Marques, E. C.; PriscoJ. T.; Gomes Filho, E. Efeito da nutricao de nitrato na tolerancia de plantas de sorgo sudao a salinidade. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v.42, p.675-683, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902011000300014

Ferreira, P. A.; Moura, R. F.; Santos, D. B.; Fontes, P. C. R.; Melo, R. F. Efeitos da lixiviacao e salinidade da agua sobre um solo salinizado cultivado com beterraba. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.10, p.570-578, 2006. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662006000300006

Gomes, S. O.; Pitombeira, J. B.; Neiva, J. N. M.; Candido, M. J. D. Comportamento agronomico e composicao quimicobromatologico de cultivares de sorgo forrageiro no Estado do Ceara. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v.37, p.221-227, 2006.

Gurgel, G. C. S.; Santos, W O.; Bezerra, F. G.; Barreto, H. B. F.; Lima, C. B. Producao de milho verde cultivado irrigado por gotejamento com agua do efluente de aquicultura. Enciclopedia Biosfera, v.8, p.771, 2012

Magalhaes, P C.; Duraes, F.; Schaffert, R. E. Fisiologia da planta de sorgo. Sete Lagoas: EMBRAPA, 2000, 46p. Circular Tecnica, 3.

Malavolta, E.; Vitti, G. C.; Oliveira, S. A. Avaliacao do estado nutricional das plantas: principios e aplicacoes. Piracicaba: Potafos, 1997. 319p.

Moraes, S. D.; Jobim, C. C.; Silva, M. S.; Marquardt, F. I. Producao e composicao quimica de hibridos de sorgo e de milho para silagem. Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal, v.14, p.624-634, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402013000400002

Plett, D. C.; Moller, I. S. Na+ transport in glycophytic plants: What we know and would like to know. Plant, Cell and Environment. v.33, p.612-626, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13653040.2009.02086.x

Reboucas, A. C. Aguas subterraneas. In: Reboucas, A. C.; Braga, B.; Tundisi, J. G. Aguas doces no Brasil: Capital ecologico, uso e conservacao. Sao Paulo: Escrituras, 1999. p. 117-151.

Santos, D. B.; Ferreira, P A.; Oliveira, F. G.; Batista, R. O.; Costa, A. C.; Cano, M. A. O. Producao e parametros fisiologicos do amendoim em funcao do estresse salino. Idesia, v.30, p.69-74. 2012. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292012000200009

Santos, R. D.; Pereira, L. G. R.; Neves, A. L. A.; Rodrigues, J. A. S.; Costa, C. T. F.; Oliveira, G. F. Agronomic characteristics of forage sorghum cultivars for silage production in the lower middle San Francisco Valley. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v.35, p.13-19, 2013.

Simoes, W L.; Yuri, J. E.; Guimaraes, M. J. M..; Santos, J. E.; Araujo, E. F. J. Beet cultivation with saline effluent from fish farming. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.20, p.62-66, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi. v20n1p62-66

Vieira, M. R.; Lacerda, C. F. de; Candido, M. J. D.; Carvalho, P L.; Costa, R. N. T.; Tabosa, J. N. Produtividade e qualidade da forragem de sorgo irrigado com aguas salinas. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.9, suplemento, p.42-46, 2005.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v20n5p461-465

Miguel J. M. Guimaraes (1), Welson L. Simoes (2), Jose N. Tabosa (3), Jose E. dos Santos (4) & Lilia Willadino (5)

(1) Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco/Departamento de Engenharia Agricola. Recife, PE. E-mail: mjmguimaraes@hotmail.com (Corresponding author)

(2) Embrapa Semiarido. Petrolina, PE. E-mail: welson.simoes@embrapa.br

(3) Instituto Agronomico de Pernambuco. Recife, PE. E-mail: tabosa@ipa.br

(4) Universidade de Pernambuco. Petrolina, PE. E-mail: josezequiel95@gmail.com

(5) Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco/Departamento de Biologia. Recife, PE. E-mail: willadino.lilia@gmail.com

Received 076-2015--30 Jun, 2015 * Approved 3 Mar, 2016 * Published 4 Apr, 2016
Table 1. Chemical, physical and granulometric parameters
of the studies soil

                 EC                 0M            P
                 dS                  g            mg
Layer (cm)   [m.sup.-1]   pH    [kg.sup.-1]   [dm.sup.-3]

0-10            1.64      5.5       7.7          15.65
10-20           1.99      5.7       5.7          14.25
20-45           2.91      7.4       6.3           3.6

Layer (cm)   K       Na    Ca    Mg    Al   H + Al   SB    CEC

                              [cmol.sub.c] [dm.sup.-3]

0-10         0.65   0.80   2.8   1.5   0     2.1     5.8   7.8
10-20        0.55   0.65   1.9   1.3   0     2.7     4.4   7.1
20-45        2.05   1.50   1.8   1.4   0     3.7     6.8   10.4

                          Density
                    (kg [dm.sup.-3])

Layer (cm)    V%    Bulk   Particle

0-10         73.4   1.46      2.59
10-20        61.8   1.46      2.51
20-45        64.7   1.37      2.52
                              Granulometry
              Total         (g [kg.sup.-1])
             porosity
Layer (cm)     (%)      Sand    Silt    Clay

0-10          43.86     729.4   182.9   87.7
10-20         41.74     789.8   116.9   93.3
20-45         45.58     613.2   178.1   208.7

                   Moisture
              (dag [kg.sup.-1])

Layer (cm)     FC        PWP

0-10          0.186     0.075
10-20         0.179     0.070
20-45         0.181     0.110

EC--Electrical conductivity of the saturation extract;
OM--Organic matter; P--Available phosphorus extracted with
Mehlich-1; Ca--Exchangeable calcium; Mg--Exchangeable
magnesium; Na -Exchangeable sodium; K--Exchangeable
potassium; Al--Exchangeable acidity; CEC--Cation exchange
capacity at pH 7.0; V--Base saturation; FC--Field capacity;
PWP--Permanent wilting point

Table 2. Chemical characteristics of the irrigation water
from fish farming

[Ca.sup.2+]   [Mg.sup.2+] [Na.sup.+]   [K.sup.+]   [Cl.sup.+]    pH

                          [mmol.sub.c] [L.sup.-1]

12.6          7.7            7.2         0.34         35.2      8.19

                                   Hardness
              EC-25 [degrees]C   CaC[0.sub.3]
[Ca.sup.2+]   dS [m.sup.-1]      mg [L.sup.-1]   S.A.R.

12.6          2.57                   50.75       2.26

EC--Electrical conductivity; Ca--Calcium; Mg--Magnesium;
Na--Sodium; K--Potassium; Cl--Chloride;
SAR--Sodium adsorption ratio

Table 3. Mean electrical conductivity of the saturation
extract (ECe) of the soil cultivated with forage sorghum
varieties subjected to leaching fractions of
0, 5, 10 and 15%

                  Leaching fraction

Layer (cm)      0    0.05    0.10   0.15

0-5          11.60   10.34   5.77   3.03
5-20         5.54    3.90    3,37   2.98
20-40        5.41    4.01    3.50   2.94
40-60        5.28    4.21    3.60   3.17
60-80        4.59    5.97    3.03   3.33
Mean         6.48    5.68    3.85   3.09

Table 4. Comparison between forage sorghum varieties for the
growth variables: plant height, stem diameter, number of
live leaves, length and width of the +3 leaf, total leaf
area (TLA) and yield

                                         +3 Leaf (cm)
Variety       PH       [??]
             (cm)      (mm)     NL     Length   Width

'Volumax'   139.4 b   13.1 a   7.2 b   36.9 b   4.2 a
'F305'      155.8 a   13.8 a   9.2 a   39.4 b   4.5 a
'Sudao'     155.8 a   13.3 a   7.0 b   49.3 a   3.9 b

                                   Yield
Variety         TLA           (t [ha.sup.-1])
            ([cm.sup.2])      FM        DM

'Volumax'     770.5 b      22.71 b    6.99 b
'F305'        1155.8 a     25.45 ab   8.97 a
'Sudao'       950.3 ab     27.79 a    8.01 ab

PH--Plant height; 0--Stem diameter; NL--Number of live leaves;
TLA--Total leaf area; FM--Fresh matter; DM--Dry matter
Same letters in the same column do not differ by Tukey
test at 0.05 probability level

Table 5. Leaf contents of potassium (K) and sodium (Na) in varieties
of forage sorghum subjected to leaching fractions with saline
fish-farming effluent under semiarid conditions

                          Leaching fraction

Variety           0         0.05        0.10       0.15

K (g [kg.sup.-1])

'Volumax'       8.91 b     11.61 b    10.21 a     5.44 b
'F305'          8.19 b     10.86 b     7.03 b     5.52 b
'Sudao'        15.65 a      17.12a     7.36 b     9.88 a

Na (mg [kg.sup.-1])

'Volumax'      220.58 b   262.90 ab   275.24 a   248.79 b
'F305'         177.38 b   245.26 b    244.56 a   199.42 b
'Sudao'        329.90 a   314.92 a    272.29 a   505.36 a

Variety        Regression equation           [R.sup.2]

K (g [kg.sup.-1])

'Volumax'      y = -0.075 ** [x.sup.2] +       0.99
               0.886 ** x + 8.943 **
'F305'         y = -0.236 ** x + 9.673 **      0.46
'Sudao'        y = -0.541 ** x + 16.561 **     0.56

Na (mg [kg.sup.-1])

'Volumax'      y = -0.68 ** [x.sup.2] +        0.99
               12.25 ** x + 22.14 **
'F305'         y = -1.13 ** [x.sup.2] +        0.99
               18.26 ** x + 178.58 **
'Sudao'        y = 2.48 * [x.sup.2]            0.85
               -27.534 ** x + 345.07 **

Same letters in the same column do not differ by Tukey test
at 0.05 probability level. **, * Coefficient of regression
significant at 0.01 and 0.05 probability levels, respectively
COPYRIGHT 2016 ATECEL--Associacao Tecnico Cientifica Ernesto Luiz de Oliveira Junior
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:texto en ingles
Author:Guimaraes, Miguel J.M.; Simoes, Welson L.; Tabosa, Jose N.; Santos, Jose E. dos; Willadino, Lilia
Publication:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental
Date:May 1, 2016
Words:4125
Previous Article:Dual crop coefficient of common bean in Tangara da Serra, Mato Grosso/Coeficiente dual de cultivo do feijoeiro em tangara da Serra, Mato Grosso.
Next Article:Compatibility of vegetable fibers with Portland cement and its relationship with the physical properties/Compatibilidade de fibras vegetais com...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters