Printer Friendly

Cryoablation effective for breast fibroadenomas: breast fibroadenomas up to 4 cm in diameter can be treated using the minimally invasive procedure.

SAN ANTONIO -- Cryoablation is an attractive alternative to surgery as primary definitive therapy for breast fibroadenomas, Sheldon Feldman, M.D., said at a breast cancer symposium sponsored by the Cancer Therapy and Research Center.

Interim results from the multicenter FibroAdenoma Cryoablation Treatment (FACT) Registry demonstrate that cryoablation is a safe, well-tolerated, minimally invasive procedure that conserves breast tissue.

Cosmesis is excellent, with little or no scarring. And unlike conventional open surgical excision of breast fibroadenomas, which typically is performed in an operating room and requires sutures, cryoablation is an office-based procedure performed through a 3-mm incision site using local anesthesia only, added Dr. Feldman, chief of the division of breast surgery at Beth Israel Medical Center, New York.

He reported on 439 FACT procedures in patients who underwent cryoablation at 55 U.S. sites. The mean baseline diameter of their fibroadenomas was 1.8 cm. A total of 79% were palpable at baseline, declining over time to 52% at 6 months after treatment and 33% at 1 year. Nearly all women who reported residual palpability described the treated area as softer and less prominent than pretreatment.

Treated fibroadenomas could be visualized using ultrasound in only 31% of cases at 6 months and 23% at 1 year.

The complication rate was low, with a 0.8% infection rate and a 2.9% incidence of hematoma. Transient ecchymosis was observed in 41% of patients at short-term follow-up.

Physician ratings of cosmesis in the cryoablated area averaged 4.8 at 6 months and 4.9 at 12 months on a 5-point scale. No volume deficits occurred, unlike the case with open surgical excision, where permanent volume deficits are common, the surgeon continued.

At 6 months' follow-up, 85% of patients indicated they would recommend the procedure to a friend, as did 82% at 12 months.

Cryoablation was performed in this series using the Food and Drug Administration-approved Visica treatment system marketed by Sanarus Medical Inc. The procedure, which takes about 30 minutes, entails ultrasound-guided insertion of the cryoablation probe into the fibroadenoma, followed by creation of an ice ball that engulfs the benign tumor, destroying the tumor cells. The body resorbs the dead tissue and ablated debris over the subsequent months.

The Visica cryoablation system is being evaluated for in situ ablation of small breast cancers. In a separate presentation at the San Antonio meeting, Michael S. Sabel, M.D., said that cryoablation offers unique immunologic advantages over both lumpectomy and hyperthermic techniques such as radiofrequency, microwave, laser, and high-intensity ultrasound ablation.

Unlike other methods, cryoablation leaves behind intact tumor proteins and tumor-associated antigens. In an inflammatory microenvironment, these antigens can induce a tumor-specific immune response, said Dr. Sabel, a surgical oncologist at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor.

In a mouse study, he demonstrated the induction of just such an augmented cryoimmunologic response as reflected in increased natural killer cell function, an increase in Th1- but not Th2-type cytokines, and an increase in tumor-specific T-cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes.

This mechanistic investigation follows Dr. Sabel's recent report of a pilot safety study involving cryoablation in the treatment of 29 patients with primary invasive breast cancers not greater than 2 cm. Follow-up standard surgical resection showed the freeze method successfully destroyed all cancers less than 1 cm as well as invasive ductal carcinomas of 1-1.5 cm lacking a significant in situ component (Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2004;11:542-9).

Dr. Feldman disclosed that he receives compensation from Sanarus Medical Inc. for submitted data.

ARTICLES BY BRUCE JANCIN

Denver Bureau
COPYRIGHT 2005 International Medical News Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Women's Health
Author:Jancin, Bruce
Publication:Internal Medicine News
Date:Apr 1, 2005
Words:588
Previous Article:What to do if breast MRI isn't a screening option.
Next Article:Circulating tumor cells predict outcome in metastatic breast Ca.
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters