Cross-reactivity of outer membrane proteins of Campylobacter species with cholera toxin.
Campylobacter jejuni a foodborne pathogen, is a leading cause of bacterial diarrhoea worldwide (1). It causes mostly inflammatory diarrhoea in individuals in developed countries, but watery diarrhoea in individuals in developing countries (2). A cholera toxin-like toxin (CTLT) produced by C. jejuni was thought to mediate watery diarrhoea (3). However, CTLT production by C. jejuni is controversial. While some investigators reported it, others did not (3). A cholera toxin gene (ctx) homologue has not been found in C. jejuni (3). There are also reports of CTLT production by non-C. jejuni species, especially C. coli, C. lari and C. hyointestinalis (4,5). We recently reexamined the question of CTLT production by C. jejuni and other species and identified the antigen that cross-reacts with CT antibody (6-8). This article summaries many findings on this line of research.
We studied a number reference and clinical isolates. Reference C. jejuni cultures that had been reported to produce CTLT included the following strains: CCUG 8731, CCUG 6951, CCUG 6968 and CCUG 8680 (received from the University of Goteborg culture collection, Goteborg, Sweden); 180 ip and 189 ip (kindly provided by G. Ruiz-Palacios, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition, Mexico Districto Federal, Mexico); and CJ0094400 (kindly provided by A. Lee, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia). A ctx gene negative, fully sequenced C. jejuni strain NCTC 11168 was obtained from B. W. Wren (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom). Clinical C. jejuni strains included 10 strains from the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh (kindly provided by M. Rahman) and 70 strains from patients treated at Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya, Kuwait. Two strains each of C. coli, C.lari, C. foetus, C. hyointestinalis and C. upsaliensis were provided by G. Hogg (University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). An enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strain, H10407, producing heat-labile toxin (LT) served as a positive control for enterotoxin production. It is well known that the NH2-terminal regions of LT and CT exhibit the highest degree of homology (91%), while the COOH-terminal region, containing the sole cystine residue in each toxin is less conserved (~52%).
All strains were screened in Casamino Acids--yeast extract (CAYE) broth supplemented with 1.0 [micro]g/ml ferric chloride (CAYEF medium) for functional CTLT production. In addition, selected C. jejuni strains were screened in (i) Brucella broth supplemented with 0.25 per cent each of L-asparagine, L-serine and L-glutamic acid (BASG broth), (ii) BASG broth supplemented with 0.05 to 0.5 per cent L-cysteine, corn starch, yeast extract and dextrose, and (iii) G-C medium supplemented with 0.1 per cent IsoVitalex (GCIV medium). The effect of polymyxin B on release of CTLT from periplasmic space was studied with cultures grown in GCIV medium. Cultures were grown microaerobically under shaking or stationary conditions at 42[degrees]C for 24-48 h.
Selected C. jejuni strains were passaged multiple times through the intestinal loops of Sprague-Dawley rats and the secreted intestinal fluids were tested for the presence of functional toxin. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell elongation assay was used for the detection of functional CTLT. Serial doubling dilutions of bacteria-free culture supernatant were used with a starting dilution of 1:2. In some cases, filtrates were concentrated to 50X by lyophilisation followed by reconstitution and dialysis before testing. Elongation of >50 per cent of the monolayer at a filtrate dilution of [greater than or equal to]1:4 was considered positive for CTLT production.
Serological testes used for the detection of CT crosss-reactive material in the culture filtrates were (i) ganglioside GM1 ELISA in which ELISA plate coated with GM1 ganglioside was reacted with culture supernatant and rabbit polyclonal CT antibody, (ii) direct ELISA in which ELISA plate was directly coated with bacterial sonicate and reacted with CT antibody, and (iii) immunoblot assay in which bacteria-free culture filtrate, crude outer membrane protein (OMP), or sarcosyl-purified OMP was separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and probed with rabbit anti-CT antibody.
The amino acid sequence of the CT cross-reactive band was analysed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI TOF-TOF). The protein identified was further confirmed by immunoblot analysis in which a recombinant C. jejuni PorA protein (fusion protein, GST-PorA expressed from porA gene of C. jejuni strain C31) was checked for its reactivity with rabbit CT polyclonal antibody and vice-versa in which rabbit antibody to recombinant porA was checked for its activity against CT.
None of the filtrates of bacteria grown in different media was positive for CTLT production by the CHO cell assay. Fifty times concentrated culture filtrates from a Swedish strain and the Australian strain tested in this assay were negative. The control ETEC strain used in this assay was positive. The Australian strain and a Kuwaiti strain gave a fluid to loop-length ratio of 0.3 after four rat ileal loop passages. However, the ileal loop fluids did not cause CHO cell elongation. In the GM1 ELISA, CAYE filtrates from two Swedish strains, the Australian strain and 16 Kuwaiti strains were positive (7).
Numerous strains (both GM1 ELISA positive as well as negative) and the NCTC 11168 strain (a known CT-negative strain) yielded two prominent bands of 78.6 kDa and 53 kDa size on immunoblot with rabbit anti CT antibody. However, when blots were probed with normal rabbit serum, the 78.6 kDa band only was visible. This suggested that the 53 kDa band was specifically recognized by the anti CT-antibody. This 53 kDa specific protein was subsequently identified as the MOMP (porA) of C. jejuni, by MALDI TOF TOF analysis. The identity of the protein was further confirmed when the recombinant PorA protein expressed as GST-porA from the porA gene of C. jejuni strain (C31) reacted with rabbit anti-CT antibody on immunoblot assay. However, a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against the GST-PorA failed to react with-CT in the immunoblot. This suggested that the reaction was a one-way reaction (7).
Direct ELISA was performed to check for CT cross-reactivity with sonicated extracts from all 7 reference strains from Sweden, Mexico and Australia, CT-negative strain, NCTC 11168, 5 Kuwait strains from among 16 GM1 ELISA positive strains and 5 GM1 ELISA negative Kuwaiti strains. All strains were positive in the direct ELISA for CT cross-reactivity. Since the cross-reacting material is PorA, it is present in sufficient quantity in bacterial sonicates used in the direct ELISA for all strains to be positive. However, in the GM1 ELISA where culture filtrates were used, only some strains would have shed the membrane protein to be positive in the assay (7).
Two strains each of C. coli, C. lari, C. foetus, C. hyointestinalis and C. upsaliensis were negative for CTLT production when culture filtrates from CAYE medium were tested in the CHO cell assay. Immunoblot analysis of crude OMPs revealed a common 53 kDa band for all species and several additional bands (six for C. foetus). When reacted with normal rabbit serum, a common non-specific band of 79 kDa for all species with two additional higher molecular weights for C. upsaliensis were visible. Apart from the 79 kDa non-specific band, the other six bands for C. foetus appeared to be specific. When Sarkosyl-purified OMPs were allowed to react with anti-CT antibody in immunoblot assays, all species (except C. foetus) produced the unique single band of 53 kDa. The purified OMP preparation from C. foetus produced several bands in a ladder-like pattern (C. foetus is known to possess an S-layer OMP which separates into a ladder-like pattern on electrophoresis), as did the crude membrane preparation. However, the nonspecific band of 79 kDa that reacted with normal rabbit serum was absent. When Sarkosyl-purified OMPs were allowed to react with normal rabbit serum in immunoblot assays, no band from any species was visible (8).
There are reported similarities in PorA across many Campylobacter species at genetic and amino acid sequence levels. Therefore, the 53 kDa protein from non-C. jejuni species that cross-reacted with anti CT antibody is likely to be PorA.
Evidence for the production by C. jejuni of an enterotoxin that is structurally and biologically related to CT and LT was based on the following observations: (i) C. jejuni causes morphological alteration and raises intracellular level of cAMP in CHO and Y-1 cells (4,9); (ii) the effects on morphology and cAMP levels in CHO and Y-1 cells are neutralised by antiserum to CT (4,9); (iii) C. jejuni induces fluid secretion in rat ileal loop assay (9,10); (iv) children infected with C. jejuni produce serum antibodies that cross-react with CT and LT (11-13); (v) culture filtrates reacted in GM1 ganglioside ELISA with antiserum to CT or LT (14,15); and (vi) galactoside, ganglioside or CT antibody affinity purified material from culture filtrates caused morphological alteration and raised cAMP levels in sensitive cells or reacted in GM1 ganglioside ELISA (15-17).
However, a careful appraisal of the literature suggests that there are problems with the assays which gave rise to these findings. For morphological assay using CHO cells, no standard criterion was set for interpreting positive results. Several studies defined elongation of any number of cells (ranging from a few to <50%) as positive for the presence of an enterotoxin (4,18-20). In other studies, either undiluted culture filtrate or filtrate at a dilution of <1:2 was used (4,21,22). In all these studies, the amount of toxin reported to be produced by the isolates was very small. This is contrary to V. cholerae and enterotoxigenic E. coli infections, where the organisms produce large amounts of enterotoxins that result in profuse watery diarrhoea, which is not seen in C. jejuni infection (2). We believe an accepted criterion for positive test would be a culture filtrate dilution of >1:4 affecting > 50 per cent of the cells. This should rule out nonspecific effects of components in the media, since undiluted or lower dilutions of the media were shown to give false positive results (23). By this criterion, all strains tested by us were negative. Filtrates of cultures produced in different media that were reported to promote enterotoxin production failed to yield positive results.
Another factor to be considered is the confounding effect of cytolethal distending toxin (CLDT) in the CHO cell assay. Both CT and CLDT cause elongation of cells after 24 h of incubation, but the toxins are distinguished on further incubation of cells. Whereas CLDT causes progressive distention and cytotoxicity of cells over the next four days, such effects are not seen with CT (5). Many reports on the production of CTLT by C. jejuni appeared before the existence of CLDT was known (9,20,24). It is quite likely that the effect of CLDT would have been confused with that of CTLT.
The amount of cAMP reported to be produced by the C. jejuni isolates in cells is small in comparison to that produced by CT or LT (4,9). There is only partial abrogation or no abrogation of the effect of the toxin by anti-CT and anti-LT sera on morphological assay using cell cultures (4,18). However, the effect of normal serum on neutralisation of morphological change in these studies is not known. CLDT also induces modest increase in cAMP levels (5). However, CT and CLDT are antigenically distinct (5). As reported by others (9,10), two of our isolates induced fluid accumulation in rat ileal loop assay, but only after repeated passage. However, as observed in another study (25), the secreted fluid did not induce elongation of CHO cells, a finding consistent with the notion that fluid secretion was not due to CTLT production. It could be due to other mechanisms such as via inflammatory mediators of secretion (26).
The evidence put forward to support the production of enterotoxin by C. jejuni was the development of serum antibodies to CT in children in Mexico (13) and Central African Republic (12) who suffered from C. jejuni diarrhoea. However, other studies failed to demonstrate such antibodies (27,28) or demonstrated a weak antibody response only (11). It is possible that children showing antibody responses were concomitantly infected with enterotoxigenic E. coli (28). The reported purification studies of a postulated enterotoxin from C. jejuni have produced confusing results (10,15,16,29). These studies used ammonium sulphate precipitation, followed by purification with affinity chromatography using galactose, gangliosides or CT antibodies. The purified fractions had either a single band of ~70 kDa (15,17) or multiple bands of 68-, 54- and 43-kDa (16,30). In another study, the molecular masses of bands that reacted with anti-CT antibody were > 90 kDa and 50 kDa (29). Some bands had biological activity (15,16) while others did not (16,30). It is thus difficult to reconcile the findings from different studies. In our immunoblot studies with CT antibody, two bands of 78.6 kDa and 53 kDa were visible. However, the high molecular weight band was due to a non-specific reaction with normal rabbit serum.
We have screened numerous, freshly isolated clinical local strains and also control strains of C. jejuni from various laboratories, which reportedly produced an enterotoxin. In spite of using several media that were reported to promote enterotoxin production by C. jejuni, none of the strains produced any enterotoxin in our hands. Thus our findings are similar to those of several other groups (11,23,27,28). Other Campylobacter species also did not produce a functional enterotoxin by CHO cell assay in this study. One of the reasons that contributed to the conclusion that C. jejuni and other species produce an enterotoxin resembling CT was the reactivity of culture filtrates with anti-CT antibody in GM1 ELISA. Our results show unequivocally that Campylobacter species possess an antigen that reacts with anti-CT antibody. That antigen is the major outer membrane protein, PorA.
Received June 14, 2010
The work reviewed in this article was supported by Kuwait University grants (MI04/00 & MI02/01) and an Australian Research Council grant ([CE] 562063). Author thanks all coauthors of the papers in which the original work was reported.
(1.) Levin RE. Campylobacter jejuni: a review of its characteristics, pathogenicity, ecology, distribution, subspecies characterization and molecular methods of detection. Food Biotechnol 2007; 21: 271-347.
(2.) Skirrow MB, Blaser MJ. Campylobacter jejuni. In: Blaser MJ, Smith PD, Ravdin JI, Greenberg HB, Guerrant RL, editors. Infections of the gastrointestinal tract. New York: Raven Press; 1995. p. 825-48.
(3.) Wassenaar TM. Toxin production by Campylobacter spp. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997; 10: 466-76.
(4.) Johnson WM, Lior H. Cytotoxic and cytotonic factors produced by Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter laridis. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 24: 275-81.
(5.) Johnson WM, Lior H. A new heat-labile cytolethal distending toxin (CLDT) produced by Campylobacter spp. Microb Pathog 1988; 4: 115-26.
(6.) Khan I, Adler B, Haridas S, Albert MJ. PorA protein of Campylobacter jejuni is not a cytotoxin mediating inflammatory diarrhoea. Microbes Infect 2005; 7: 853-9.
(7.) Albert MJ, Haridas S, Steer D, Dhaunsi GS, Smith AI, Adler B. Identification of a Campylobacter jejuni protein that cross-reacts with cholera toxin. Infect Immun 2007; 75: 3070-3.
(8.) Albert MJ, Haridas S, Adler B. Major outer membrane proteins from many Campylobacter species cross-react with cholera toxin. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2008; 15: 859-62.
(9.) Ruiz-Palacios GM, Torres J, Torres NI, Escamilla E, Ruiz-Palacios BR, Tamayo J. Cholera-like enterotoxin produced by Campylobacter jejuni: characterisation and clinical significance. Lancet 1983; 30: 250-3.
(10.) Klipstein FA, Engert RF, Short HB. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for virulence properties of Campylobacter jejuni clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 23: 1039-43.
(11.) Honda T, Miwatani T, Mizuno S, Maki S. Serum antibodies reacting with Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin in sera of patients suffering from Campylobacter jejuni infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1986; 36: 53-5.
(12.) Martin PMV, Mathiot J, Ipero J, Georges AJ, Georges-Courbot MC. Antibody response to Campylobacter coli in children during intestinal infection and carriage. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26: 1421-4.
(13.) Ruiz-Palacios GM, Lopez-Vidal Y, Torres J, Torres N. Serum antibodies to heat-labile enterotoxin of Campylobacter jejuni. J Infect Dis 1985; 152: 413-6.
(14.) Klipstein FA, Engert RF. Properties of crude Campylobacter jejuni heat-labile enterotoxin. Infect Immun 1984; 45: 314-9.
(15.) McCardell BA, Madden JM, Lee EC. Production of cholera-like toxin by Campylobacter jejuni/coli. Lancet 1984; i: 448-9.
(16.) Daikoku T, Kawaguchi M, Takama K, Suzuki S. Partial purification and characterization of the enterotoxin produced by Campylobacter jejuni. Infect Immun 1990; 58: 2414-9.
(17.) McCardell BA, Madden JM, Lee EC. Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli production of a cytotonic toxin immunologically similar to cholera toxin. J Food Prot 1984; 47: 943-9.
(18.) Belbouri A, Megraud F. Enterotoxin-like activity produced by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from patients and healthy controls in Algeria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1988; 51: 25-8.
(19.) Everest PH, Goossens H, Butzler JP, Lloyd D, Knutton S, Ketley JM, et al. Differentiated Caco-2 cells as a model for enteric invasion by Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. J Med Microbiol 1992; 37: 319-25.
(20.) Goossens H, Butzler JP, Takeda Y. Demonstration of cholera-like enterotoxin production by Campylobacter jejuni. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1985; 29: 73-6.
(21.) Florin I, Antillon F. Production of enterotoxin and cytotoxin in Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated in Costa Rica. J Med Microbiol 1992; 37: 22-9.
(22.) Lindblom GB, Johny M, Khalil K, Mazhar K, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Kaijser B. Enterotoxigenicity and frequency of Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli and C. laridis in human and animal stool isolates from different countries. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 54: 163-7.
(23.) Konkel ME, Lobet Y, Cieplak W. Examination of multiple isolates of Campylobacter jejuni for evidence of cholera toxin-like activity. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser MJ, Tomkins LS, editors. Campylobacter jejuni: current status and future trends. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; 1992. p. 193-8.
(24.) McCardell BA, Madden JM, Stanfield JT. Effect of iron concentration on toxin production in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Can J Microbiol 1986; 32: 395-401.
(25.) Everest PH, Goossens H, Sibbons P, Lloyd DR, Knutton S, Leece R, et al. Pathological changes in the rabbit ileal loop model caused by Campylobacter jejuni from human colitis. J Med Microbiol 1993; 38: 316-21.
(26.) Everest PH, Cole AT, Hawkey CJ, Knutton S, Goossens H, Butzler JP, et al. Roles of leukotriene B4, prostaglandin E2, and cyclic AMP in Campylobacter jejuni-induced intestinal fluid secretion. Infect Immun 1993; 61: 4885-7.
(27.) Perez-Perez GI, Cohn DL, Guerrant RL, Patton CM, Reller LB, Blaser MJ. Clinical and immunologic significance of cholera-like toxin and cytotoxin production by Campylobacter species in patients with acute inflammatory diarrhea in the USA. J Infect Dis 1989; 160: 460-8.
(28.) Perez-Perez GI, Taylor DN, Echeverria PD, Blaser MJ. Lack of evidence of enterotoxin involvement in pathogenesis of Campylobacter diarrhea. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser MJ, Tomkins LS, editors. Campylobacter jejuni: current status and future trends. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; 1992. p. 184-92.
(29.) Collins S, O'Loughlin E, O'Rourke J, Li Z, Lee A, Howden M. A cytotonic, cholera toxin-like protein produced by Campylobacter jejuni. Comp Biochem Physiol B 1992; 103: 299-303.
(30.) Klipstein FA, Engert RF. Purification of Campylobacter jejuni enterotoxin. Lancet 1984; i: 1123-4.
Reprint requests: Dr M. John Albert, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, PO Box 24923, Safat 13110, Kuwait e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
M. John Albert Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Albert, M. John|
|Publication:||Indian Journal of Medical Research|
|Date:||Feb 1, 2011|
|Previous Article:||The complexity of ToxT-dependent transcription in Vibrio cholerae.|
|Next Article:||Genetic components of stringent response in Vibrio cholerae.|