Cross-country differences in exchange rate effects on inflation.
In The International Price System (NBER Working Paper No. 21646), Gita Gopinath argues that the relationship between exchange-rate fluctuations and inflation varies considerably from country to country. Analyzing data from 46 developed and developing nations, she finds that which currency is used to set international prices has large, asymmetric effects on whether exchange-rate fluctuations pass through to domestic prices.
Gopinath's principal finding is that when a large fraction of a country's trade is denominated in foreign currencies, its rate of inflation will be more strongly affected by exchange-rate fluctuations. As an example, Turkey invoices just three percent of its imports in Turkish lira. When the lira depreciates by 10 percent relative to the currencies of Turkey's trading partners, Gopinath calculates, import prices measured in lira rise by 9.3 percent after one quarter and 10 percent after two years, meaning that the exchange-rate fluctuation is fully passed through to prices. In contrast, the United States invoices 93 percent of its imports in U.S. dollars. When the dollar depreciates by 10 percent, import prices measured in dollars rise by only 3.4 percent after one quarter and 4.4 percent after two years.
This incomplete pass-through rate has important benefits for the U.S. economy. In particular, it implies that the US. inflation rate is relatively immune to the monetary policy of the rest of the world. If Turkey tightens its monetary policy, this will affect the exchange rate between the U.S. and Turkey, but will not have much effect on U.S. inflation. However, if the US. tightens monetarypolicy, the resulting appreciation of the dollar will tend to inflate prices in Turkey, as 60 percent of Turkish imports are denominated in dollars.
Gopinath shows that, like the overall basket of Turkish imports, the subset of U.S. imports that is priced in foreign currencies also has a high pass-through rate. Of course, this would happen mechanically ifprices did not adjust. But, importantly, it also holds for goods for which prices change after an exchange rate shock.
Gopinath argues that the strong effects of currency denomination arise because it is costly for firms to adjust prices. She shows that if it were costless to adjust prices, currency denomination would be irrelevant. When there are costs to renegotiating prices, however, exporting firms' choice of currency denomination will depend on their own cost composition and on the currency choices of other exporters. If most other exporters price in dollars, then a firm will be better able to control its relative price in the market if it also prices in dollars. The findings suggest that absent coordinated international action, the dollar is likely to remain the dominant currency of international trade for the foreseeable future.
EXCHANGE RATE FLUCTUATIONS AND INFLATION Percent of imports in Rise in import prices after home currency 10% depreciation in home currency Quarter after the shock 1 8 Turkey 3% 9.3% 10.0% United States 93% 3.4% 4.4% Source: Author's calculations
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||The NBER Digest|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2016|
|Previous Article:||Household debt and business cycles worldwide.|
|Next Article:||Hospital prices and health spending among the privately insured.|