Printer Friendly

Cranial Autonomic Features in Migraine and Migrainous Features in Cluster Headache.

INTRODUCTION

Migraine, a severe form of headache that affects up to 16% of the adult population, can have a major impact on the quality of life (1). According to limited clinical data, cluster headache (CH) affects 0.1% of adults (2).

The International Headache Society (IHS) definitions make a clear distinction between migraine and CH (3). IHS criteria identify four main features distinguishing CH from migraine: unilaterality of short-duration attacks of pain, periodicity of the syndrome, accompanying ipsilateral autonomic features, and restlessness during pain. Unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms (uAS) are typical features of trigem inal-autonomic cephalgia (4). uAS symptoms have also been reported in some patients with migraine accompanying other features of migraine attacks. On the other hand, migrainous features, such as nausea, vomiting, and photophobia, have been observed during some CH episodes (2,4,5). Some patients may present with characteristics of both headache types. These observations suggest that at least some patients experience clinical features shared by both conditions (4,5,6,7).

This study evaluated the prevalence of uAS in patients suffering from migraines and assessed the expression of these symptoms using a retrospective design. Additionally, the pain characteristics of migraine attacks experienced by pure migraine patients with and without autonomic features were compared.

METHODS

This study was part of an ongoing Turkish Headache Database Study investigating the clinical characteristics and outcomes of headache syndromes in the Turkish population. The Turkish Headache Database includes a total of 19488 patients since May 2013, with patients mostly diagnosed as having primary headaches. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of Mersin University, and informed consent was obtained from all participants (MEU.0.01.00.06/265, 20.10.2008). Of the 12036 patients enrolled in the larger study, 2955 consecutive patients with definite migraine with and without aura and 93 patients with CH were enrolled in the present study. Migraine patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence of at least one associated autonomic symptom: 89 migraine patients having uAS (MwuAS) and 2773 migraine patients who did not have uAS (MwouAS).

Classification of migraine and CH was based on The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition beta version (Headache Classification Committee, 2013). Patients reporting at least one autonomic symptom during an attack were considered to be MwuAS. Personal identifiers were removed during the subject selection, and written informed consent was obtained by a representative of each center involved in this study before any data were included in database. Subjects younger than 18 years of age and those older than 65 years of age received headache diagnosis codes other than ICHD 1.1, 1.2, and 3.1; patients with "headache-plus" diagnoses (e.g., migraine plus tension type) and patients with incomplete headache data were not included.

Data on the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, including age at onset, headache duration, headache frequency, presence of aura, headache characteristics, localization and intensity of pain, triggering factors, associated features, and medical and family history, were gathered from all patients by headache specialists in face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire drawn from a web-based database. The presence of autonomic symptoms (ptosis, lacrimation, rhinorrhea, facial swelling, conjunctival injection, and pupil changes) in migraineurs and the presence of migrainous features (nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia) in CH patients were also noted.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered and analyzed in the Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS, 2007) and PASS 2008 Statistical Software (Utah, USA). For the classification and regression tree (CRT), the program STATISTICA [R]-6.0 was also used. After a descriptive analysis (mean, standard deviation, etc.), the groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, or chi square test according to variable type. The clinical features and demographics of the patients with cranial autonomic symptoms were compared with those of the patients with CH and migraine patients without autonomic symptoms. Risk factors for MwuAS were determined using multivariate analysis. A classification tree model was performed using CRT analysis. The most important variables were determined in the classification model. The prediction values in the terminal nodes of the classification tree were compared with the observed values (with or without autonomic symptoms), and sensitivity and specificity were estimated. Results are given as the 95% confidence interval (CI), and p<0.05 was accepted as significant.

RESULTS

The headache characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1. Group I consisted of 89 patients with MwuAS (70 females; average age, 36.4 [+ or -]11.9 years); Group II consisted of 2773 patients with MwouAS (2397 females; average age, 41.6 [+ or -]13.2 years); and Group III consisted of 93 patients with CH (30 females; average age, 42.2 [+ or -]12.7 years).

The medical histories of the patients revealed that travel sickness, abdominal pain, and periodic vomiting were more common in patients with MwuAS (24.7%, 18%, and 6.7%, respectively) than in patients with MwouAS (8.2%, 2.3%, and 0.9%, respectively) (p<0.001) (Table 2). Co-morbid medical histories of diabetes mellitus (14.8%, p<0.001), coronary heart disease (13.4%, p<0.001), and smoking (27.9% vs. 23.6%, p<0.001) were significantly more common in patients with MwouAS. Family histories of headaches, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiac disease were significantly more common in patients with MwuAS (Table 2).

uAS in migraine patients and migrainous features in CH are summarized in Table 3. Among patients with MwuAS, lacrimation was noted in 63 patients (70.8%), conjunctival injection in 33.7% of patients, facial swelling in 12.4%, ptosis in 6.7%, and rhinorrhea in 4.5%. Of the migrainous features of CH patients, nausea accompanied CH in 38.7% of patients, although vomiting was less common (19.4%). Phonophobia was reported in 41.9% of patients, and photophobia was reported in 34.4%.

Multivariate analysis of the risk factors of MwuAS

Unilaterality increased the risk of MwuAS by a factor of 2.5 (p=0.001); periocular localization increased the risk by a factor of 4 (p=0.001); and starvation increased the risk by a factor of 3.9 (p=0.030). Individuals with a history including attacks of abdominal pain were almost 3.6 times (p=0.001) more likely to suffer from MwuAS.

CRT-a recent statistical method commonly used in algorithm analysis-demonstrated that the most sensitive parameters for MwuAS diagnosis were lacrimation, facial swelling, and conjunctival injection, with high sensitivity (94.38%) and specificity (99.89%), as shown in Figure 1 and Table 4.

CRT showed the list of the most important ways of defining uAS in migraine subjects. If a clinician has limited time for a patient interview, he or she should ask about lacrimation, facial swelling, and conjunctival injection as uAS. As shown in Table 4, this model performed the best at identifying MwouAS subjects.

DISCUSSION

Limited data are available about the frequency and importance of uAS in migraine patients compared with those in CH patients. Our study revealed a moderate frequency of uAS in migraine sufferers. Our model identified a high frequency of some associated features in the subjects with MwuAS compared with those with CH. It should be noted that certain common features of migraines and CH may overlap depending on how certain questions are posed in the clinical setting.

The role of autonomic features accompanying migraines and migrainous features accompanying CH needs to be clarified (8). Migraine may be caused by trigeminovascular system activation leading to neurogenic inflammation (9). Activation of the trigeminovascular system may trigger the efferent parasympathetic arm of the trigeminoautonomic reflex in some patients with migraine (10). This study described uAS. However, migraine headaches are generally unilateral and severe in patients with uAS (7,11).

In the present study, the most sensitive parameters for detecting MwuAS were lacrimation (70.8%), conjunctival injection (33.7%), and facial swelling (12.4%). With regard to migrainous features in CH, nausea occurred in 38.7% of the patients; although vomiting was less common (19.4%), phonophobia occurred in 41.9% of patients, and photophobia was reported by 34.4%. To the best of our knowledge, no report has yet been published about these ratios in clinical settings. However, the retrospective design of this study underscores the importance of continuing education about this topic for headache specialists; indeed, the scarcity of uAS may be related to the lack of physician attention to this condition. Additional studies for further development of the headache classification criteria and for clarification of the role of physician attention in the diagnostic process are thus warranted.

Unilateral and periocular localization, starvation (3.9 times as frequent), and history of abdominal pain (3.6 times as frequent) were found to be independent risk factors in migraine patients with uAS. The pain is unilateral in migraine patients, but it may be bilateral or start unilaterally and become generalized (12). In our migraine and CH groups, the headache was mostly unilateral (62.9% and 81.7%, respectively). The frequency of CH attacks can vary from one attack to up to eight attacks per week (12,13). In our study, the attacks occurred in bouts lasting between 6 and 30 days, during which CH occurred mainly during sleep. Among active migraineurs, the median attack frequency is 1.5 attacks per month, although 10% of migraineurs have weekly attacks (14,15). The mean attack frequencies among migraineurs with and without autonomic features were 4-12 and 3-15 attacks per month, respectively. The pain was mostly stabbing (38.7%) in CH patients and throbbing in patients with MwuAS and MwouAS (89.9% and 75.1%, respectively). A throbbing type of pain was also frequent in CH patients (29.0%). Although blunt and pressing type headaches were more frequent in patients with MwouAS, blunt pain was absent in patients with MwuAS, and the pressing pain rate was similar to that in patients with CH.

Patients with CH are restless during attacks of pain, or pain does not exacerbate during movement, which is the opposite in migraine patients. Previous studies mentioned that the pain of CH was made better by movement in 80% of cases, compared with 15% of migraineurs, whereas the pain was worse with movement in 20% of the patients with CH and 85% of those with migraine headache (16,17). We found a significantly higher frequency of these parameters in the subjects with MwuAS (58.4%) compared with MwouAS (50.5%) and CH (11.8%). However, the multivariate regression analysis did not identify this parameter as defining MwouAS. In this model, the aggravation by emotional stress had clinical importance. We found that 0.31% of 2862 migraineurs had unilateral autonomic features, and 19.4-41.9% of 93 patients in the CH group had migrainous features. Therefore, distinctions between related clinical syndromes are often artificial, and many patients may have clinical features that overlap several such categories. Nausea is a common accompanying symptom in migraine (18). Studies have suggested that nausea and vomiting never accompany CH, but some authors claimed that nausea is present in half of the patients with CH, although vomiting remains less common. Nausea occurred in 38.7% and vomiting in 19.4% of our patients with CH. Photophobia and phonophobia occur in up to 90% of patients (19). The percentage of patients with CH who experience photophobia varies between 5% and 72% across studies. Ekbom (16) reported phonophobia in 39% of 105 patients. Of the 50 patients observed by Kudrow (19) during cluster attacks, 72% experienced photophobia with or without phonophobia. Phonophobia and photophobia were present in 41.9 and 34.4% of our patients with CH, respectively.

Detailed examination of the accompanying symptoms in migraine might help to understand its pathophysiology. Unilaterality suggests activation of the trigeminovascular system, a throbbing nature suggests vascular innervation, and aggravation by movement is a reflection of neurogenic inflammation (8). The presence of uAS suggests activation of the cranial parasympathetic system in migraineurs with uAS (10). Ocular symptoms might also be due to neurogenic inflammation (20). Our data suggested an overlapping pathophysiological process in two distinct diseases (migraine and CH) as reflected in the overlapping clinical features.

Unilaterality, periocular localization, starvation, and history of abdominal pain were independent risk factors for MwuAS patients. The most sensitive parameters for MwuAS diagnosis were lacrimation, facial swelling, and conjunctival injection, with high sensitivity and specificity.

The main limitation of this study is lower (3.1%) prevalence of MwuAS compared with that found in prospective clinical data. However, this is a retrospective study, and we did not expect our sample to be representative of the entire population of migraine patients examined via epidemiological or prospective designs.

The following major contributions of this study should be noted: It is the first large-sample database analysis of overlapping features of CH and migraine. It provides the first data defining the importance of overlapping features in a clinical setting. It is the first study to rank overlapping features (lacrimation, facial swelling, and conjunctival injection).

In conclusion, although migraine and CH are considered two different entities with different, but not-yet-fully-understood, pathophysiology, they may share a common pathophysiological step, probably functional alteration in the hypothalamic or brainstem circuits. The existence of this common mechanism could give a clue toward a specific agent for the treatment of migraine and CH attacks. Hence, assessing common clinical features, particularly autonomic symptoms, in CH and migraine is mandatory, and headache specialists have to consider this in their clinical practice to obtain true figures. Particularly, lacrimation, conjunctival injection, and facial swelling are widely experienced by migraineurs. Further comprehensive studies are needed to unravel the role of these accompanying autonomic symptoms in diagnosis and therapy.

Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of Mersin University.

Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from patients who participated in this study.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed..

Author Contributions: Concept - DU, SA; Design - DU, SA, AO, OOY; Supervision - AO, DU, BT; Resources - GO, DU, SA; Data Collection and/or Processing - DU, SA; Analysis and/or Interpretation - GT, BT, DU, SA, DU, AO, SA, OOY; Literature Search - DU, SA; Writing Manuscript - DU, SA; Critical Review - AO, BT; Other - AO, DU, SA, GT, BT, THDSG.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

REFERENCES

(1.) Edvinsson L. Aspects on the pathophysiology of migraine and cluster headache. Pharmacol Toxicol 2000; 89:65-73. [CrossRef]

(2.) Newman LC, Goadsby P, Lipton RB. Cluster and related headaches. Med Clin North Am 2001; 85:997-1016. [CrossRef]

(3.) Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013; 33:629-808. [CrossRef]

(4.) Solomon S, Karfunkel P, Guglielmo KM. Migraine-cluster headache syndrome. Headache 1985; 25:236-239. [CrossRef]

(5.) Wheeler SD. Significance of migraineous features in cluster headache: Divalproex responsiveness. Headache 1998; 38:547-551. [CrossRef]

(6.) 'Amico D, Centonze V, Grazzi L, Leone M, Ricchetti G. Bussone G. Coexistence of migraine and cluster headache: report of 10 cases and possible pathogenetic implications. Headache 1997; 37:21-25. [CrossRef]

(7.) Barbanti P, Fabbrini G, Pesare M, Vanacore N, Cerbo R. Unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms in migraine. Cephalalgia 2002; 22:256-259. [CrossRef]

(8.) Barbanti P, Fofi L, Dall'Armi V, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Vanacore N, Bonassi S. Rizatriptan in migraineurs with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms. J Headache Pain 2012; 13:407-414. [CrossRef]

(9.) Goadsby PJ, Charbit AR, Andreou AP, Akerman S, Holland PR. Neurobiology of migraine. Neuroscience 2009; 161:327-341. [CrossRef]

(10.) Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L, Ekman R. Vasoactive peptide release in the extracerebral circulation of humans during migraine headache. Ann Neurol 1990; 28:183-187. [CrossRef]

(11.) Obermann M, Yoon MS, Dommes P, Kuznetsova J, Maschke M, Weimar C, Limmroth V, Diener HC, Katsarava Z. Prevalence of trigeminal autonomic symptoms in migraine: a population based study. Cephalalgia 2007; 27:504-509. [CrossRef]

(12.) Manzoni GC, Terzano MG, Bono G, Micieli G, Martucci N, Nappi G. Cluster headache-clinical findings in 180 patients. Cephalalgia 1983; 3:21-30. [CrossRef]

(13.) Lance JW, Anthony M. Migrainous neuralgia or cluster headache? J Neurol Sci 1971; 13:401-414. [CrossRef]

(14.) Symonds C. A particular variety of headache. Brain 1956; 79:217-232. [CrossRef]

(15.) Stewart WF, Schecter A, Lipton RB. Migraine heterogeneity: disability, pain intensity and attack frequency and duration. Neurology 1994; 44: 24-39.

(16.) Ekbom K. Migraine in patients with cluster headache. Headache 1974; 14:69-72. [CrossRef]

(17.) Russell D. Cluster headache: severity and temporal profiles of attacks and patient activity prior to and during attacks. Cephalalgia 1981; 1:209-216. [CrossRef]

(18.) Silberstein SD. Migraine symptoms: results of a survey of self-reported migraineours. Headache 1995; 35:387-396. [CrossRef]

(19.) Kudrow L, Kudrow DB. Inheritance of cluster headache and its possibility link to migraine. Headache 1994; 34:400-407. [CrossRef]

(20.) Wang ZY, Waldeck K, Grundemar L, Hakanson R. Ocular inflammation induced by electroconvulsive treatment: contribution of nitric oxide and neuropeptides mobilized from C-fibres. Br J Pharmacol 1997; 120:1491-1496. [CrossRef]

Derya ULUDUZ (1), Semih AYTA (2), Aynur OZGE (3), Osman Ozgur YALIN (4), Turkish Headache Database Study Group (3), Gulhan OREKICI TEMEL (5), Bahar TASDELEN (5)

(1) Department of Neurology, Istanbul University Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

(2) Department of Pediatrics, Child Neurology Unit, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

(3) Department of Neurology Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

(4) Department of Neurology Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

(5) Department of Biostatistics, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

Correspondence Address: Derya Uluduz, Istanbul universitesi istanbul Tip Fakultesi, NOroloji Anabilim Dali, istanbul, Turkey E-mail: deryaulu@yahoo.com

Received: 12.06.2016, Accepted: 03.07.2016, Available Online Date: 15.07.2016

https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2016.19183
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the study patients

                                                MwuAS
                                               n=89 (%)

Headache duration (month)                     60 (24-120)
Median (25-75% perc)
Headache frequency (day)                       8 (4-12.5)
Median (25-75% perc)
Headache Features          Stabbing            0 (0.0%)
                           Blunt               0 (0.0%)
                           Pressing            7 (7.9%)
                           Shock-like          0 (0.0%)
                           Throbbing          80 (89.9%)
Localization               Unilateral (yes)   56 (62.9%)
                           Unilateral (no)    33 (37.1%)
Trigger factors            Coughing           17 (23.9%)
                           Emotional stress   73(82.0%)
                           Physical activity  52 (58.4%)
                           Alcohol             8 (9.0%)
                           Starving           40 (44.9%)

                               MwouAS            CH
                             n=2773 (%)        n=93 (%)         (+) P

Headache duration (month)    60 (24-120)     48 (12-120)        0.1076
Median (25-75% perc)
Headache frequency (day)     6a (3-15)       20b (6.5-30)       0.0002
Median (25-75% perc)
Headache Features            48 (1.7%)       36 (38.7%) (a,b)
                            167 (6.0%) (a)    5 (5.4%)
                            399 (14.4%)       7 (7.5%)
                             21 (0.8%)        4 (4.3%) (a)     <0.0001
                           2084 (75.1%) (a)  27 (29.0%) (a,b)
Localization               1173 (42.3%) (a)  76 (81.7%) (a,b)  <0.0001
                           1600 (57.7%)      17 (18.3%)
Trigger factors             315 (11.3%) (a)   1 (1.0%) (a,b)
                           2072 (74.7%)      39 (41.9%) (a,b)
                           1402 (50.5%)      11 (11.8%) (a,b)
                              8 (0.3%) (a)   24 (25.8%) (a,b)  <0.0001
                            211 (7.6%) (a)    6 (6.4%) (a)

(+a) Kruskal-Wallis, (b) Chi square test

MwuAS: migraine with autonomic symptoms; CH: cluster headache;
MwouAS: migraine without autonomic symptoms.

Table 2. Comparison of the migraine (with and without unilateral
autonomic symptoms) and CH patients

                              MwuAS        MwouAS           CH
                             n=89 (%)     n=2773 (%)       n=93 (%)

Periodical vomiting          6 (6.7%)    25 (0.9%) (a)    0 (0.0%) (a)
Travel sickness             22 (24.7%)  228 (8.2%) (a)    5 (5.4%) (a)
History of abdominal pain   16 (18%)     64 (2.3%) (a)    0 (0.0%) (a)
Diabetes mellitus            2 (2.2%)   410 (14.8%) (a)  10 (10.8%) (a)
Coronary heart disease       1 (1.1%)   372 (13.4%) (a)  11 (11.8%) (a)
Smoking                     21 (23.6%)  773 (27.9%)      32 (34.5%)
Alcohol                      0 (0.0%)   395 (14.2%) (a)  26 (28%) (a,b)
Family history of headache  42 (47.2%)  835 (30.1%) (a)  22 (23.7%) (a)

MwuAS: migraine with autonomic symptoms; CH: cluster headache; MwouAS:
migraine without autonomic symptoms; DM: diabetes mellitus.
Differences in groups (a) MwuAS; (b) MwouAS.

Table 3. Associated features of the migraine and CH patients

                          MwuAS        MwouAS              CH
                         n=89 (%)     n=2773 (%)          n=93 (%)

Nausea                  78 (87.6%)  2235 (80.6%)      36 (38.7%) (a,b)
Vomiting                48 (53.9%)  1211 (43.7%)      18 (19.4%) (a,b)
Phonophobia             76 (85.4%)  2100 (75.7%) (a)  39 (41.9%) (a,b)
Photophobia             72 (80.9%)  1907 (68.8%) (a)  32 (34.4%) (a,b)
Lacrimation             63 (70.8%)     2 (0.1%) (a)   50 (58.8%) (b)
Ptosis                   6 (6.7%)      0 (0.0%) (a)    8 (15.1%) (b)
Rhinorrhea               4 (4.5%)      1 (0.0%) (a)   29 (41.4%) (a,b)
Facial swelling         11 (12.4%)     0 (0.0%) (a)   21 (32.3%) (a,b)
Conjunctival injection  30 (33.7%)     2 (0.1%) (a)   42 (52.5%) (a,b)
Pupil changes            3 (3.4%)      0 (0.0%) (a)    3 (6.1%) (b)

Differences in groups (a) MwuAS; (b) MwouAS.

Table 4. Classification matrix table of this model

                             Observed Class
                             MwouAS  MwvuAS  Total

Predicted Class    MwouAS    1810     1      1811
                   MwvuAS       2    43        45
Total                        1812    44      1856
COPYRIGHT 2018 AVES
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:RESEARCH ARTICLE
Author:Uluduz, Derya; Ayta, Semih; Ozge, Aynur; Yalin, Osman Ozgur; Temel, Gulhan Orekici; Tasdelen, Bahar
Publication:Archives of Neuropsychiatry
Date:Sep 1, 2018
Words:3516
Previous Article:Investigation of Copy Number Variation by arrayCGH in Turkish Children and Adolescents Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Next Article:Motives and Consequences of Online Game Addiction: A Scale Development Study.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |